No guitar of mine
Anthony
newtons.
Hatchetmama
wrote:
>has ever been anywhere near any other structure with a force exceeding 0.005
>newtons.
>
Why didn't you deny it back when it originally happened, then?
Why now?
--
-HM
mhm 34x19
Smeeter 41
WSD #39.3
SPA Oct02
UFtTA #01
slumpy
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 21:50:35 +1200, "Anthony" <Arny...@arn.com>
> wrote:
>
> > has ever been anywhere near any other structure with a force
> > exceeding 0.005 newtons.
> >
>
> Why didn't you deny it back when it originally happened, then?
>
> Why now?
Slapdash behaviour.
--
slumpy
tradelist and images - http://tinyurl.com/4l7o4
Why not prove you are not tagging along on a leash and jumping through my
hoops by not changing your name to escape the killfile ?
Or then again, you could be a Pussy....
Blake
"Hatchetmama" <hatch...@EMAILCHANGEimabadlittlegirl.com> wrote in message
news:ld38c1thh735m1093...@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 21:50:35 +1200, "Anthony" <Arny...@arn.com>
> wrote:
>
> >has ever been anywhere near any other structure with a force exceeding
0.005
> >newtons.
> >
>
> Why didn't you deny it back when it originally happened, then?
>
> Why now?
Hey Lorrette next time you start turning green and froth at the mouth I'll
bethinking of you. I hear people with epilepsy quite often piss and shit
themselves. Is that true shitty pants ?
That's okay you're in good company with slurpie. He still pisses the bed.
Hatchetmama
wrote:
>It didn't take long before Hatchetmama came up with this secondrate comment:
>
>> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 21:50:35 +1200, "Anthony" <Arny...@arn.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > has ever been anywhere near any other structure with a force
>> > exceeding 0.005 newtons.
>> >
>>
>> Why didn't you deny it back when it originally happened, then?
>>
>> Why now?
>
>Slapdash behaviour.
How very British of you.
Hatchetmama
>
>"Hatchetmama" <hatch...@EMAILCHANGEimabadlittlegirl.com> wrote in message
>news:ld38c1thh735m1093...@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 21:50:35 +1200, "Anthony" <Arny...@arn.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >has ever been anywhere near any other structure with a force exceeding
>0.005
>> >newtons.
>> >
>>
>> Why didn't you deny it back when it originally happened, then?
>>
>> Why now?
>
>Hey Lorrette next time you start turning green and froth at the mouth I'll
>bethinking of you.
How in the hell will you know the next time I have I seizure? Do you
have ESP?
>I hear people with epilepsy quite often piss and shit
>themselves.
Educate yourself.
For your brother-in-law's sake.
And for your sake, get help.
Anthony
"Hatchetmama" <hatch...@EMAILCHANGEimabadlittlegirl.com> wrote in message
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 13:09:54 +1200, "Blake" <Arny...@arn.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Hatchetmama" <hatch...@EMAILCHANGEimabadlittlegirl.com> wrote in
message
> >news:ld38c1thh735m1093...@4ax.com...
> >> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 21:50:35 +1200, "Anthony" <Arny...@arn.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >has ever been anywhere near any other structure with a force exceeding
> >0.005
> >> >newtons.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Why didn't you deny it back when it originally happened, then?
> >>
> >> Why now?
> >
> >Hey Lorrette next time you start turning green and froth at the mouth
I'll
> >bethinking of you.
>
> How in the hell will you know the next time I have I seizure? Do you
> have ESP?
>
> >I hear people with epilepsy quite often piss and shit
> >themselves.
>
> Educate yourself.
> For your brother-in-law's sake.
He's fine on medication, is allowed to drive.
> And for your sake, get help.
Perhaps now you might Ms Tough and Nasty , just might, leave me the fuck
alone then ?
You give it but don't like it back.
Arsehole.
slumpy
So you'll be looking back on yout triumphant return with rosey-glasses I
take it ?
So far, you appeared [like a turd on a trainer] and abused everyone exactly
like you did before, and now it gets too hot for poor little Banovic, you
claim you want to be left alone !!
What kind of fuckwit are you ?
What grade did you get at Fuckwit College NSW ?
Hatchetmama
wrote:
>
>"Hatchetmama" <hatch...@EMAILCHANGEimabadlittlegirl.com> wrote in message
>news:a1oac15l0ai5r72bj...@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 13:09:54 +1200, "Blake" <Arny...@arn.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"Hatchetmama" <hatch...@EMAILCHANGEimabadlittlegirl.com> wrote in
>message
>> >news:ld38c1thh735m1093...@4ax.com...
>> >> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 21:50:35 +1200, "Anthony" <Arny...@arn.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >has ever been anywhere near any other structure with a force exceeding
>> >0.005
>> >> >newtons.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Why didn't you deny it back when it originally happened, then?
>> >>
>> >> Why now?
>> >
>> >Hey Lorrette next time you start turning green and froth at the mouth
>I'll
>> >bethinking of you.
>>
>> How in the hell will you know the next time I have I seizure? Do you
>> have ESP?
>>
>> >I hear people with epilepsy quite often piss and shit
>> >themselves.
>>
>> Educate yourself.
>> For your brother-in-law's sake.
>
>He's fine on medication, is allowed to drive.
Yes, I have a drivers licence too, Tony.
Educate yourself.
>
>> And for your sake, get help.
>
>Perhaps now you might Ms Tough and Nasty , just might, leave me the fuck
>alone then ?
Is that what you want, Mr Paranoid?
For me to leave you alone?
I guess you shouldn't have been Mr. Paranoid then, eh?
Think before you post.
>You give it but don't like it back.
>Arsehole.
You really think I've been after you for 6 months, eh?
You're a real freak.
Hatchetmama
wrote:
A sad a lonely one.
>
>What grade did you get at Fuckwit College NSW ?
--
Anthony
"slumpy" <not...@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:3ilkadF...@individual.net...
go eat Lorrette's shit =)
Anthony
"Hatchetmama" <hatch...@EMAILCHANGEimabadlittlegirl.com> wrote in message
Obviously genetically superior to you and your crooked yellow teeth and low
bi-sexual IQ and stalking obsessive, jealous and ranting beahviour. And
Crozier, well ole shitty pants was a load that should have been swallowed.
But hey keep responding. How did your ugly big teeth get so yellow anyway
Obsessio?
>
> A sad a lonely one.
Poor Shitty pants, ever the drunken projectionist.
Anthony
"Hatchetmama" <hatch...@EMAILCHANGEimabadlittlegirl.com> wrote in message
Funny that you told me you aren't allowed to drive.
Are you driving ?
You shouldn't be.
>
> Educate yourself.
Here I'll educate you, you retarded moron.
http://www.drhull.com/EncyMaster/E/epilepsy.html
http://www.epilepsywestlothian.co.uk/factsheets/psycho_adult.htm
>
> >
> >> And for your sake, get help.
> >
> >Perhaps now you might Ms Tough and Nasty , just might, leave me the fuck
> >alone then ?
>
> Is that what you want, Mr Paranoid?
> For me to leave you alone?
Well if you can work "fuck off and die" into a meaningful phrase you might
come close to what I think of a worthless and detestable cunt of a thing
like you.
>
> I guess you shouldn't have been Mr. Paranoid then, eh?
> Think before you post.
Go shit yourself retard.
>
>
> >You give it but don't like it back.
> >Arsehole.
>
> You really think I've been after you for 6 months, eh?
>
Obsessed I'd say since that last comment of yours on March 16, you only
reappeared like the return of some plaster saint on wheels when you sensed I
was back, you trolled AG, RMMG and AML-Z hoping i'd bite.
Wassa madda Shitty Pants did I wipe the floor with the big tough nasty bitch
last time too ?
Oh diidums !
> You're a real freak.
>
I'm not the one who shits myself.
Jeff Cook
"Anthony" <Arny...@arn.com> wrote in message
news:42c60...@x-privat.org...
involuntarily craps herself when she has seizures. As this forms the basis
of your attack against her, I'd say you're running on empty. I hope you
don't get splinters in those prehistoric knuckles while you're scraping that
barrel...
Jeff
Anthony
"Jeff Cook" <jeff...@despammed.com> wrote in message
news:N2rxe.11632$oJ....@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
You're right. It's cold gin time again.
I hope you
> don't get splinters in those prehistoric knuckles while you're scraping
that
> barrel...
>
> Jeff
You're right. You arent an authority on much at all.
but then again I don't go screaming "careful or you might find yourself
someplace you don't want to be " all because she picks a flame war and then
whimpers to her freinds.
You sound like Mr. Logic from Viz comics BTW. Go squeeze those zits !
And I probably have been a tad harsh on the poor maggoty arsed old crone.
They don't hold a candle to Eurpoean or Australian women.
Bad experiences with Americans will do that to you though.
Working with the arseholes doesn't help. The US plunders our country and
Rotten Johnny kisses their greedy arses and our country's resources tuh-tah.
Jeff Cook
>
> You sound like Mr. Logic from Viz comics BTW. Go squeeze those zits !
>
time. I haven't worn them yet, because I only need them for close-up small
stuff. The screen is too far away so every thing goes blurry if I put them
on. You'd know what I'm talking about...
Jeff
Anthony
Yeah well I have a small burn on my retina from looking at the sun in
Denmark that is like looking at everything with a small drop of water on a
sheet over plastic, tends to make warp things a little.
slumpy
When you get round to answering a straight question [something you manage to
avoid every time you are asked one] then I may consider anything you say
worth reading.
slumpy
> But hey keep responding. How did your ugly big teeth get so yellow
> anyway Obsessio?
Must have happened when I fell out of your broken killfile.
slumpy
> "Jeff Cook" <jeff...@despammed.com> wrote in message
So speaks a stupid man.
Every time you post anything you just reinforce the theory that you are one
of the most idiotic assholes on Usenet.
tho...@antispam.ham
> When you get round to answering a straight question [something you
> manage to avoid every time you are asked one] then I may consider anything
> you say worth reading.
Tomorrow.
tho...@antispam.ham
> Must have happened when I fell out of your broken killfile.
When, allegedly, slumpy?
tho...@antispam.ham
> So speaks a stupid man.
I don't care what you said.
> Every time you post anything you just reinforce the theory that you are
> one of the most idiotic assholes on Usenet.
You're erroneously presupposing that you are correct.
Anthony
> It didn't take long before Anthony came up with this secondrate comment:
>
> > But hey keep responding. How did your ugly big teeth get so yellow
> > anyway Obsessio?
>
> Must have happened when I fell out of your broken killfile.
Yes I seem to remember them being chipped.
Anthony
One who can afford decent wine, food, dental care, and regular maintenance
on my motor vehicle perhaps ? Now there's a conundrum for Mr. Crapulent.
> > > What grade did you get at Fuckwit College NSW ?
Credits mostly, three HD's and quite a few distinctions. Enough to hawk my
wits with.
> > go eat Lorrette's shit =)
>
> When you get round to answering a straight question [something you manage
to
> avoid every time you are asked one] then I may consider anything you say
> worth reading.
Existentialist poppycock !
slumpy
> "slumpy" <not...@privacy.net> wrote in message
> news:3in76qF...@individual.net...
> > It didn't take long before Anthony came up with this secondrate
> > comment:
> >
> > > But hey keep responding. How did your ugly big teeth get so yellow
> > > anyway Obsessio?
> >
> > Must have happened when I fell out of your broken killfile.
>
> Yes I seem to remember them being chipped.
Shame your killfile is as incompetent as you are.
Now what was that phone number again ?
Want to go through the grief of changing it yet again ?
Muwahahahaha !!!
--
slumpy
tradelist and images - http://tinyurl.com/4l7o4
Do you know your own phone number ?
Did you record your ansaphone message when drunk ?
http://www.slumpy.fast24.co.uk/ansaphone.mp3
slumpy
comment:
> slumpy writes:
The proof is in the History.
--
slumpy
tradelist and images - http://tinyurl.com/4l7o4
Anthony
<tho...@antispam.ham> wrote in message
news:5f7830596c554c78...@tornado.socalrr.cum...
slumpy
> <tho...@antispam.ham> wrote in message
At least I can read my phone number off in one go, Dumbass.
--
slumpy
tradelist and images - http://tinyurl.com/4l7o4
tho...@antispam.ham
> The proof is in the History.
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
slumpy
comment:
> slumpy writes:
>
> > The proof is in the History.
>
> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Do the search.
Google for "Aussie", "Fuckwit" " Balkan" and "Reject".
Anthony
Anthony
slumpy
The ansaphone message ?
yes, couldn't agree more - it says:
Don't record yourself when you're drunk
Anthony
> It didn't take long before Anthony came up with this secondrate comment:
>
> > "slumpy" <not...@privacy.net> wrote in message
> > news:3in76qF...@individual.net...
> > > It didn't take long before Anthony came up with this secondrate
> > > comment:
> > >
> > > > But hey keep responding. How did your ugly big teeth get so yellow
> > > > anyway Obsessio?
> > >
> > > Must have happened when I fell out of your broken killfile.
> >
> > Yes I seem to remember them being chipped.
>
> Shame your killfile is as incompetent as you are.
>
> Now what was that phone number again ?
>
> Want to go through the grief of changing it yet again ?
If you were only a tad smarter you could change it to suit yourself.
My lawn needs mowing = )
Anthony
> It didn't take long before Anthony came up with this secondrate comment:
>
> > "slumpy" <not...@privacy.net> wrote in message
> > news:3inbdpF...@individual.net...
> > > It didn't take long before tho...@antispam.ham came up with this
> > > secondrate comment:
> > >
> > > > slumpy writes:
> > > >
> > > > > So speaks a stupid man.
> > > >
> > > > I don't care what you said.
> > > >
> > > > > Every time you post anything you just reinforce the theory that
> > > > > you are one of the most idiotic assholes on Usenet.
> > > >
> > > > You're erroneously presupposing that you are correct.
> > >
> > > The proof is in the History.
> > > --
> > > slumpy
> > > tradelist and images - http://tinyurl.com/4l7o4
> > > Do you know your own phone number ?
> > > Did you record your ansaphone message when drunk ?
> > > http://www.slumpy.fast24.co.uk/ansaphone.mp3
> > >
> >
> > QED :-).
>
> The ansaphone message ?
Oh yes the (badly recorded) ansaphone message.
>
> yes, couldn't agree more - it says:
>
and what does it say ?
> Don't record yourself when you're drunk
Rather, it says . . . "I Paul Chapman am a ridiculously obsessed nutcase
bored with stalking me ex-wife"
Now, lemme see if I press this button Bozo's eyes roll, his tongue pops
out and his ears wiggle.
Anthony
> It didn't take long before Anthony came up with this secondrate comment:
>
> > <tho...@antispam.ham> wrote in message
> > news:5f7830596c554c78...@tornado.socalrr.cum...
> > > slumpy writes:
> > >
> > > > So speaks a stupid man.
> > >
> > > I don't care what you said.
> > >
> > > > Every time you post anything you just reinforce the theory that
> > > > you are one of the most idiotic assholes on Usenet.
> > >
> > > You're erroneously presupposing that you are correct.
> > >
> > Slumpy's a master of inadequacy.
>
> At least I can read my phone number off in one go, Dumbass.
Now just how did you get my number again I'll never know!
I obviously forgot to get it unlisted . . . again !
Damn !
Still it's nice to see you are still obsessing.
Slumpy, I may be a beautiful guy but how many times must I tell.you, I just
don't fancy other men !
tho...@antispam.ham
> Do the search.
Why would you want to prove the point that you are a fool, slumpy?
> Google for "Aussie", "Fuckwit" " Balkan" and "Reject".
Note: no response.
slumpy
How does that figure ?
I [along with everyone else] fails to see the connection between your [new,
not old] ansaphone message, your inability to handle your alcohol, and my
ex, who I speak to once a fortnight.
But then someone who gets no phonecalls would call that stalking I suppose,
even when she calls me !!
slumpy
That wasn't the question, but as long as you're doing the Patent Lifshine
Duck'n'Swerve, how's your guitar ?
tho...@antispam.ham
> Now just how did you get my number again I'll never know!
Why would I get your number again you will never know?
> I obviously forgot to get it unlisted.
Classic pontification.
> again!
Classic lack of specificity by someone who is a dissipated escapist.
> Damn!
Dams are for beavers.
> Still it's nice to see you are still obsessing.
Ha! Not me, but maybe your mum was still obsessing.
> Slumpy, I may be a beautiful guy but how many times must I tell.
Ten
> you, I just don't fancy other men!
Do you like many men?
tho...@antispam.ham
> How does that figure?
Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
> I [along with everyone else] fails to see the connection between your
> [new, not old] ansaphone message, your inability to handle your alcohol,
> and my ex, who I speak to once a fortnight.
Aye... I'll drink any man under the table.
> But then someone who gets no phonecalls would call that stalking I
> suppose, even when she calls me!
When was that do you think?
tho...@antispam.ham
> That wasn't the question, but as long as you're doing the Patent
> Lifshine Duck'n'Swerve, how's your guitar?
What was the question?
Anthony
<tho...@antispam.ham> wrote in message
news:4b03036baef84ea6...@tornado.socalrr.cum...
> Anthony writes:
>
> > Now just how did you get my number again I'll never know!
>
> Why would I get your number again you will never know?
Probably better off not knowing.
>
> > I obviously forgot to get it unlisted.
>
> Classic pontification.
Well they adore me as such.
> > again!
>
> Classic lack of specificity by someone who is a dissipated escapist.
Yay another Hawkwind fan !
> > Damn!
>
> Dams are for beavers.
Not if they're clean.
>
> > Still it's nice to see you are still obsessing.
>
> Ha! Not me, but maybe your mum was still obsessing.
She's too old for all that.
> > Slumpy, I may be a beautiful guy but how many times must I tell.
>
> Ten
fold ?
>
> > you, I just don't fancy other men!
>
> Do you like many men?
My Dad's a good bloke.
Anthony
Speak for yourself, though I expect the world would bewilder anyone who goes
through life imitating lizards, rolling their eyes and wiggling their ears.
> But then someone who gets no phonecalls would call that stalking I
suppose,
> even when she calls me !!
On off pension week ?
gatesofbabblelawn
"slumpy" <not...@privacy.net> wrote:
> It didn't take long before Anthony came up with this secondrate comment:
>
> > "Jeff Cook" <jeff...@despammed.com> wrote in message
> > news:FKrxe.11658$oJ....@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> > >
> > > "Anthony" <Arny...@arn.com> wrote in message
> > > news:42c64...@x-privat.org...
> > > >
> > > > You sound like Mr. Logic from Viz comics BTW. Go squeeze those
> > > > zits !
> > > >
> > > I probably look a bit like him too now. I just got glasses for the
> > > first time. I haven't worn them yet, because I only need them for
> > > close-up small stuff. The screen is too far away so every thing
> > > goes blurry if I put them on. You'd know what I'm talking about...
> >
> > Yeah well I have a small burn on my retina from looking at the sun in
> > Denmark that is like looking at everything with a small drop of water
> > on a sheet over plastic, tends to make warp things a little.
>
> So speaks a stupid man.
>
> Every time you post anything you just reinforce the theory that you are one
> of the most idiotic assholes on Usenet.
It is becoming painfully obvious why I left this group back in January.
Very little wereo and way more then would ever be needed Banofee pie.
slumpy
Sorry, I don't do alcospeak.
Please sober up and try again.
slumpy
comment:
> slumpy writes:
Think ?
I know when it was thanks.
slumpy
comment:
> Anthony writes:
No, only me. He doesn't fancy any of the others.
slumpy
> <tho...@antispam.ham> wrote in message
Is he a slatker ?
Or just another drunken Banovic Bum ?
mariposas morgan mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges
> "slumpy" <not...@privacy.net> wrote in message
> news:3incmcF...@individual.net...
> > It didn't take long before Anthony came up with this secondrate comment:
> >
> > > "slumpy" <not...@privacy.net> wrote in message
> > > news:3inbdpF...@individual.net...
> > > > It didn't take long before tho...@antispam.ham came up with this
> > > > secondrate comment:
> > > >
> > > > > slumpy writes:
> > > > >
> > > > > > So speaks a stupid man.
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't care what you said.
> > > > >
> > > > > > Every time you post anything you just reinforce the theory that
> > > > > > you are one of the most idiotic assholes on Usenet.
> > > > >
> > > > > You're erroneously presupposing that you are correct.
> > > >
> > > > The proof is in the History.
> > > > --
> > > > slumpy
> > > > tradelist and images - http://tinyurl.com/4l7o4
> > > > Do you know your own phone number ?
> > > > Did you record your ansaphone message when drunk ?
> > > > http://www.slumpy.fast24.co.uk/ansaphone.mp3
> > > >
> > >
> > > QED :-).
> >
> > The ansaphone message ?
>
> Oh yes the (badly recorded) ansaphone message.
australia - new south asia division?
were they the ones that broke the bank as monte cassino
arf meow arf - dogs and cats living together
the erisian constancy - though chaos is transformed
but never lost to sea - grey ordered ranks are swarmed
tho...@antispam.ham
> Probably better off not knowing.
How much better?
> Well they adore me as such.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
expected from someone who is complacent.
> Yay another Hawkwind fan!
Reread your statement.
> Not if they're clean.
Classic lack of specificity.
> She's too old for all that.
Since when is she too old for all that?
> fold?
Specious.
> My Dad's a good bloke.
Classic insecurity complex, as evidenced by your being moody and
hypersensitive, Anthony.
tho...@antispam.ham
> No, only me.
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> He doesn't fancy any of the others.
Amusing that your claim above strengthens the case that you are a fool,
slumpy, given that you can't remember your own questions even when they are
preserved in the text you're quoting.
tho...@antispam.ham
> Think?
Classic disregard for netiquette, as evidenced by your ongoing replies.
> I know when it was thanks.
Tomorrow.
slumpy
comment:
> slumpy writes:
When will you start posting sense ?
tho...@antispam.ham
> When will you start posting sense?
In an hour or so.
slumpy
comment:
> slumpy writes:
>
> > When will you start posting sense?
>
> In an hour or so.
Many thanks.
I've set my clock.
tho...@antispam.ham
> Many thanks.
Get fucked.
> I've set my clock.
I too have set your clock.
Hatchetmama
wrote:
>
>"Hatchetmama" <hatch...@EMAILCHANGEimabadlittlegirl.com> wrote in message
>news:svebc1p5fu2uhda0i...@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 2 Jul 2005 02:05:35 +1200, "Anthony" <Arny...@arn.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"Hatchetmama" <hatch...@EMAILCHANGEimabadlittlegirl.com> wrote in
>message
>> >news:a1oac15l0ai5r72bj...@4ax.com...
>> >> On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 13:09:54 +1200, "Blake" <Arny...@arn.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >"Hatchetmama" <hatch...@EMAILCHANGEimabadlittlegirl.com> wrote in
>> >message
>> >> >news:ld38c1thh735m1093...@4ax.com...
>> >> >> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 21:50:35 +1200, "Anthony" <Arny...@arn.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >has ever been anywhere near any other structure with a force
>exceeding
>> >> >0.005
>> >> >> >newtons.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Why didn't you deny it back when it originally happened, then?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Why now?
>> >> >
>> >> >Hey Lorrette next time you start turning green and froth at the mouth
>> >I'll
>> >> >bethinking of you.
>> >>
>> >> How in the hell will you know the next time I have I seizure? Do you
>> >> have ESP?
>> >>
>> >> >I hear people with epilepsy quite often piss and shit
>> >> >themselves.
>> >>
>> >> Educate yourself.
>> >> For your brother-in-law's sake.
>> >
>> >He's fine on medication, is allowed to drive.
>>
>> Yes, I have a drivers licence too, Tony.
>
>Funny that you told me you aren't allowed to drive.
>Are you driving ?
>You shouldn't be.
I have a licence legally, Tony.
With my doctor's approval.
>
>>
>> Educate yourself.
>
>Here I'll educate you, you retarded moron.
>
>http://www.drhull.com/EncyMaster/E/epilepsy.html
Do you know what kind of seizures I have, out of the many, many
different types of seizures there are out there?
No?
Ah. I see.
>http://www.epilepsywestlothian.co.uk/factsheets/psycho_adult.htm
>>
>> >
>> >> And for your sake, get help.
>> >
>> >Perhaps now you might Ms Tough and Nasty , just might, leave me the fuck
>> >alone then ?
>>
>> Is that what you want, Mr Paranoid?
>> For me to leave you alone?
>
>Well if you can work "fuck off and die" into a meaningful phrase you might
>come close to what I think of a worthless and detestable cunt of a thing
>like you.
>>
>> I guess you shouldn't have been Mr. Paranoid then, eh?
>> Think before you post.
>
>
>Go shit yourself retard.
>>
>>
>> >You give it but don't like it back.
>> >Arsehole.
>>
>> You really think I've been after you for 6 months, eh?
>>
>Obsessed I'd say since that last comment of yours on March 16, you only
>reappeared like the return of some plaster saint on wheels when you sensed I
>was back, you trolled AG, RMMG and AML-Z hoping i'd bite.
I "sensed you were back", eh?
Riiiight...
>Wassa madda Shitty Pants did I wipe the floor with the big tough nasty bitch
>last time too ?
Um No.
You cried "Never Contact Me Again" and disappeared for 3 months.
>Oh diidums !
>
>> You're a real freak.
>>
>I'm not the one who shits myself.
Care to rethink that?
>
--
-HM
mhm 34x19
Smeeter 41
WSD #39.3
SPA Oct02
UFtTA #01
slumpy
comment:
> slumpy writes:
I'm so glad.
slumpy
> > I'm not the one who shits myself.
>
> Care to rethink that?
Sorry, that just had me in bits.
Anthony
No he is not a "slatker". You haven't been drinking in the bath again have
you ?
>
> Or just another drunken Banovic Bum ?
No he doesn't drink.
Now, Grandpa Chapman he taught you to drink aged five in Thornton Heath. Did
he also teach your Dad to beat his wife and kids? Your abusive father
explains your dependence on mood changing chemicals btw.
Anthony
<tho...@antispam.ham> wrote in message
news:8f4329409af2461b...@tornado.socalrr.cum...
That's something you can never know
>
> > Well they adore me as such.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
> expected from someone who is complacent.
No invective there. Complaceny ? perhaps.
> > Yay another Hawkwind fan!
>
> Reread your statement.
Pink Floid perhaps ?
>
> > Not if they're clean.
>
> Classic lack of specificity.
Well all the beavers I know are clean. I can't sepak for all them other lot.
>
> > She's too old for all that.
>
> Since when is she too old for all that?
I'll have to ask her that but I may embarass her.
>
> > fold?
>
> Specious.
>
> > My Dad's a good bloke.
>
> Classic insecurity complex, as evidenced by your being moody and
> hypersensitive, Anthony.
No he really, really is a good bloke right !
slumpy
> > > My Dad's a good bloke.
> >
> > Is he a slatker ?
>
> No he is not a "slatker". You haven't been drinking in the bath again
> have you ?
I heard a really loud WHOOSHING sound as a black kettle flew past.....
> > Or just another drunken Banovic Bum ?
>
> No he doesn't drink.
> Now, Grandpa Chapman he taught you to drink aged five in Thornton
> Heath. Did he also teach your Dad to beat his wife and kids? Your
> abusive father explains your dependence on mood changing chemicals
> btw.
And you base all this rubbish on...what ?
An overactive alcohol consumption coupled with a nasty streak ?
tho...@antispam.ham
> Slumpy's a master of inadequacy.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
tho...@antispam.ham
> That's something you can never know No invective there.
Not even once?
> Complaceny?
Classic hypocrisy, as evidenced by the posting of the same tripe over and
over.
> perhaps.
You don't sound too sure.
> Pink Floid perhaps?
You can't get anywhere with 'maybe this' and 'maybe that.' Make up your
fucking mind.
> Well all the beavers I know are clean.
Does anyone else know they are clean?
> I can't sepak for all them other lot.
I think you are just scared to try.
> I'll have to ask her that but I may embarass her.
I hope you don't embarass her.
> No he really, really is a good bloke right!
Ambiguous.
tho...@antispam.ham
> I'm so glad.
Irrelevant.
Hatchetmama
wrote:
>It didn't take long before Hatchetmama came up with this secondrate comment:
>
>> > I'm not the one who shits myself.
>>
>> Care to rethink that?
>
>Sorry, that just had me in bits.
<smiles>
Hatchetmama
<tho...@antispam.ham> wrote:
>Anthony writes:
[...]
>
>> Pink Floid perhaps?
>
>You can't get anywhere with 'maybe this' and 'maybe that.' Make up your
>fucking mind.
I'm so sorry, tholen. I don't believe that even his mind fucks.
[...]
slumpy
> On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 02:53:41 +0000, tho...@antispam.ham
> <tho...@antispam.ham> wrote:
>
> > Anthony writes:
> [...]
> >
> > > Pink Floid perhaps?
> >
> > You can't get anywhere with 'maybe this' and 'maybe that.' Make up
> > your fucking mind.
>
> I'm so sorry, tholen. I don't believe that even his mind fucks.
>
>
> [...]
But watch that right hand go like the
clappers....http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v634/skajah/wanker2.jpg
Hatchetmama
wrote:
>It didn't take long before Hatchetmama came up with this secondrate comment:
>
>> On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 02:53:41 +0000, tho...@antispam.ham
>> <tho...@antispam.ham> wrote:
>>
>> > Anthony writes:
>> [...]
>> >
>> > > Pink Floid perhaps?
>> >
>> > You can't get anywhere with 'maybe this' and 'maybe that.' Make up
>> > your fucking mind.
>>
>> I'm so sorry, tholen. I don't believe that even his mind fucks.
>>
>>
>> [...]
>
>But watch that right hand go like the
>clappers.... http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v634/skajah/wanker2.jpg
If he's a Thelemite, he wouldn't want to waste a drop.
slumpy
> On Sun, 3 Jul 2005 19:08:30 +0100, "slumpy" <not...@privacy.net>
> wrote:
>
> > It didn't take long before Hatchetmama came up with this secondrate
> > comment:
> >
> > > On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 02:53:41 +0000, tho...@antispam.ham
> > > <tho...@antispam.ham> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Anthony writes:
> > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > > Pink Floid perhaps?
> > > >
> > > > You can't get anywhere with 'maybe this' and 'maybe that.' Make
> > > > up your fucking mind.
> > >
> > > I'm so sorry, tholen. I don't believe that even his mind fucks.
> > >
> > >
> > > [...]
> >
> > But watch that right hand go like the
> > clappers....
> > http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v634/skajah/wanker2.jpg
>
> If he's a Thelemite, he wouldn't want to waste a drop.
I'll leave the dumb question to someone else I think.
tho...@antispam.ham
> [.
How ironic.
> ] I'm so sorry, tholen.
Are you really sorry?
> I don't believe that even his mind fucks.
You should.
> [.
You're erroneously presupposing that my statement is irrelevant,
Hatchetmama.
> ].
Irrelevant.
tho...@antispam.ham
> It didn't take long before Hatchetmama came up with this secondrate But
> watch that right hand go like the.
How many fingers do you have, 12 perhaps?
tho...@antispam.ham
> It didn't take long before Hatchetmama came up with this secondrate I'll
> leave the dumb question to someone else I think.
That's what you get for thinking, slumpy.
Dt Lemons 1900
<tho...@antispam.ham> wrote in message
news:24d69c9413a04ff8...@tornado.socalrr.cum...
What was Slumpy thinking when he came up with this pathetic LIE about having
some sort of squaw GF? What kind of grown man is so childish that they feel
a need to make up LIES about having an indian GF. Children do stuff like
this, not grown men, that is unless they are very pathetic grown men. It
really does speak volumes about what kind of person Slumpy is.
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.music.deep-purple/msg/6f150ffde7c67222?hl=en
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.music.deep-purple/msg/2669a4b38a6036fa?hl=en
mariposas morgan mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges
tho...@antispam.ham <tho...@antispam.ham> wrote:
that does not compute will robinson
arf meow arf - dogs and cats living together
the erisian constancy - though chaos is transformed
but never lost to sea - grey ordered ranks are swarmed
Anthony
<tho...@antispam.ham> wrote in message
news:56816ae57d0e435a...@tornado.socalrr.cum...
> Anthony writes:
>
> > That's something you can never know No invective there.
>
> Not even once?
>
> > Complaceny?
>
> Classic hypocrisy, as evidenced by the posting of the same tripe over and
> over.
Nope.
>
> > perhaps.
>
> You don't sound too sure.
Maybe then.
> > Pink Floid perhaps?
>
> You can't get anywhere with 'maybe this' and 'maybe that.' Make up your
> fucking mind.
1000% fucking positive.
>
> > Well all the beavers I know are clean.
>
> Does anyone else know they are clean?
I hope nobody else knows whether the beaver I know is clean or not.
>
> > I can't sepak for all them other lot.
>
> I think you are just scared to try.
A tad.
> > I'll have to ask her that but I may embarass her.
>
> I hope you don't embarass her.
>
I won't ask then.
> > No he really, really is a good bloke right!
>
> Ambiguous.
Good: caring, sharing, hard working and selfless.
tho...@antispam.ham
> What was Slumpy thinking when he came up with this pathetic LIE about
> having some sort of squaw GF?
Do you know what slumpy thinking when he came up with that pathetic lie
about having some sort of squaw gf?
> What kind of grown man is so childish that they feel a need to make up
> LIES about having an indian GF.
What kind indeed.
> Children do stuff like this, not grown men, that is unless they are very
> pathetic grown men.
It seems like most of the people around here are children.
> It really does speak volumes about what kind of person Slumpy is.
Is there more than one kind?
tho...@antispam.ham
> that does not compute will robinson.
Non sequitur.
tho...@antispam.ham
> Nope.
I don't believe you.
> Maybe then.
I hate indecisive people.
> 1000% fucking positive.
Classic hearsay from someone who is manipulative.
> I hope nobody else knows whether the beaver I know is clean or not.
Abandon all hope ye who enter here.
> A tad.
Illogical, given that it refers to your excuse.
> I won't ask then.
I'm well aware of your evasion, Anthony.
> Good: caring, sharing, hard working and selfless.
Classic pontification by someone who is self-absorbed and introverted.
mariposas morgan mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges
tho...@antispam.ham <tho...@antispam.ham> wrote:
that does not compute
tho...@antispam.ham
> that does not compute.
Classic inability to identify an issue on the part of someone who is
disdainful.
Hatchetmama
<tho...@antispam.ham> wrote:
>Hatchetmama writes:
>
>> [.
>
>How ironic.
>
>> ] I'm so sorry, tholen.
>
>Are you really sorry?
>
>> I don't believe that even his mind fucks.
>
>You should.
Why should I believe that?
>
>> [.
>
>You're erroneously presupposing that my statement is irrelevant,
>Hatchetmama.
Why would your statement be irrelevant?
You're erroneously presupposing that I'm erroneously presupposing that
your statement is irrelevant, tholen.
>
>> ].
>
>Irrelevant.
STOP TEARING MY POSTS APART, tholen.
how rude.
<sulk>
tho...@antispam.ham
> Why should I believe that?
Why ask why?
> Why would your statement be irrelevant?
I'm not sure why. Are you?
> You're erroneously presupposing that I'm erroneously presupposing that
> your statement is irrelevant, tholen.
So what if I am erroneously presupposing that you are erroneously
presupposing that my statement is irrelevant? Who gives a fuck?
> STOP TEARING MY POSTS APART, tholen.
Still suffering from reading comprehension problems?
> how rude.
Where, allegedly?
mariposas morgan mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges
tho...@antispam.ham <tho...@antispam.ham> wrote:
that does not commute
Anthony
<tho...@antispam.ham> wrote in message
news:244a4f3da59b4429...@tornado.socalrr.cum...
I always tell the truth.
> > Maybe then.
>
> I hate indecisive people.
>
> > 1000% fucking positive.
>
> Classic hearsay from someone who is manipulative.
Manipulative?
>
> > I hope nobody else knows whether the beaver I know is clean or not.
>
> Abandon all hope ye who enter here.
Beware of the gnawing beaver.
>
> > A tad.
>
> Illogical, given that it refers to your excuse.
>
> > I won't ask then.
>
> I'm well aware of your evasion, Anthony.
What was the question ?
>
> > Good: caring, sharing, hard working and selfless.
>
> Classic pontification by someone who is self-absorbed and introverted.
Just happy.
tho...@antispam.ham
> I always tell the truth.
I don't want to.
> Manipulative?
I'm not surprised that you're not interested in a logical discussion.
> Beware of the gnawing beaver.
Liar.
> What was the question?
That wasn't the question, Anthony. Have you always had short term memory
problems?
> Just happy.
Are you really happy?
K_Bot
person employed to remove unwanted threads and lint from the belly buttons
of stud farm animals, winced:
> I always tell the truth.
Do you really? You always tell the truth? Without fail, ever?
> Manipulative?
Classic hallucination by someone who is emotionally constricted.
> Beware of the gnawing beaver.
You're erroneously presupposing that you are correct.
Anthony
<tho...@antispam.ham> wrote in message
news:1940ebcaf54e435b...@tornado.socalrr.cum...
> Anthony writes:
>
> > I always tell the truth.
>
> I don't want to.
You should. The truth is better than lying.
>
> > Manipulative?
>
> I'm not surprised that you're not interested in a logical discussion.
I am if you are.
>
> > Beware of the gnawing beaver.
>
> Liar.
The beaver with no teeth then ?
> > What was the question?
>
> That wasn't the question, Anthony. Have you always had short term memory
> problems?
No. The question was already answered.
>
> > Just happy.
>
> Are you really happy?
Relatively. Know any good lanscapers ?
Anthony
"K_Bot" <nos...@fuck-off-and-die.com> wrote in message
news:93b68764a42e46db...@you.gill-equipped-loggerheaded-dessert
.net...
> Anthony, <gna...@minnieshole.com>, the acned, catchpenny haggard, and
> person employed to remove unwanted threads and lint from the belly buttons
> of stud farm animals, winced:
>
> > I always tell the truth.
>
> Do you really? You always tell the truth? Without fail, ever?
Don't you ?
>
> > Manipulative?
>
> Classic hallucination by someone who is emotionally constricted.
Tripe !
>
> > Beware of the gnawing beaver.
>
> You're erroneously presupposing that you are correct.
You are just erroneous.
> > What was the question?
>
> That wasn't the question, Anthony. Have you always had short term memory
> problems?
Didn't I just answer this quesiton ?
>
> > Just happy.
>
> Are you really happy?
>
>
Relatively. Know any good landscapers ?
[with correct spelling]
tho...@antispam.ham
> You should.
Classic illogical circular reasoning.
> The truth is better than lying.
How much better?
> I am if you are.
How do you know I am?
> The beaver with no teeth then?
Classic inferiority complex, as evidenced by your need to cut someone down
to a level lower than the one at which you perceive yourself to be, Anthony.
> No.
Classic illogical circular reasoning.
> The question was already answered.
Note: no response.
> Relatively.
Troll.
> Know any good lanscapers?
Why do you ask if I know any good lanscapers, Anthony? Don't you know any?
K_Bot
sufferer, and bill poster, conveyed:
> Don't you?
You're erroneously presupposing that I don't already know.
> Tripe!
Classic reading comprehension problem.
> You are just erroneous.
How do you know I am just erroneous?
> Didn't I just answer this quesiton?
Still suffering from reading comprehension problems?
> Relatively.
When, allegedly?
> Know any good landscapers?
What makes you ask if I know any good landscapers, Anthony?
> [with correct spelling].
Classic strawman argument.
Anthony
<tho...@antispam.ham> wrote in message
news:a834f7fb1c174b04...@tornado.socalrr.cum...
> Anthony writes:
>
> > You should.
>
> Classic illogical circular reasoning.
>
> > The truth is better than lying.
>
> How much better?
Always better.
> > I am if you are.
>
> How do you know I am?
It was a question
> > The beaver with no teeth then?
>
> Classic inferiority complex, as evidenced by your need to cut someone down
> to a level lower than the one at which you perceive yourself to be,
Anthony.
Silly.
Beavers without teeth can't cut anything down.
> > No.
>
> Classic illogical circular reasoning.
>
> > The question was already answered.
>
> Note: no response.
Noted.
>
> > Relatively.
>
> Troll.
A magic troll.
If I gave you three wishes..
What would you wish for.
> > Know any good lanscapers?
>
> Why do you ask if I know any good lanscapers, Anthony? Don't you know any?
Not one.
Anthony
> Anthony, <gna...@minnieshole.com>, the error-prone, crownless herpes
> sufferer, and bill poster, conveyed:
>
> > Don't you?
>
> You're erroneously presupposing that I don't already know.
>
Perhaps you do and perhaps not.
> > Tripe!
>
> Classic reading comprehension problem.
Classic ? Individually honed I'd say.
> > You are just erroneous.
>
> How do you know I am just erroneous?
Because you are incorrect..
>
> > Didn't I just answer this quesiton?
>
> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems?
Nup.
> > Relatively.
>
> When, allegedly?
Now.
> > Know any good landscapers?
>
> What makes you ask if I know any good landscapers, Anthony?
Obviously you don't then.
> > [with correct spelling].
>
> Classic strawman argument.
Classic troll reply.
Anthony
<tho...@antispam.ham> wrote in message
news:6c21852c1a8c4dcd...@tornado.socalrr.cum...
Some people are several kinds.
tho...@antispam.ham
> Always better.
Can you think of a specific example?
> It was a question Silly.
Classic hallucination.
> Beavers without teeth can't cut anything down.
Classic lack of specificity by someone who is boring.
> Noted.
Classic inferiority complex, as evidenced by your need to cut someone down
to a level lower than the one at which you perceive yourself to be, Anthony.
> A magic troll.
So, how do you feel about being trolled by a bot, Anthony?
> If I gave you three wishes.
Pffft. Wishes are for fanciful dullards who can't face reality and have to
get off on silly dreams and yearnings.
> What would you wish for.
I can wish all I want, I won't get it from you.
> Not one.
Classic hearsay.
tho...@antispam.ham
> Perhaps you do and perhaps not.
Don't be so hesitant.
> Classic?
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
expected from someone who is dictatorial.
> Individually honed I'd say.
Troll.
> Because you are incorrect.
As long as your opinions are delusional, you're in trouble.
> Nup.
Still suffering from reading comprehension problems?
> Now.
Why now?
> Obviously you don't then.
So why are you making off-topic posts, Anthony?
> Classic troll reply.
I am not a troll. I am a bot, Anthony.
tho...@antispam.ham
> Some people are several kinds.
I see that you're still playing the parrot, Anthony
Anthony
<tho...@antispam.ham> wrote in message
news:a0824806dd26460f...@tornado.socalrr.cum...
> Anthony writes:
>
> > Perhaps you do and perhaps not.
>
> Don't be so hesitant.
I thought I was being indecisive so there you go.
Even bots can be wrong sometimes, if I were you I'd kick your programmer's
arse.
>
> > Classic?
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
> expected from someone who is dictatorial.
Dictatorial ?
>
> > Individually honed I'd say.
>
> Troll.
I am not a troll <sobs>
>
> > Because you are incorrect.
>
> As long as your opinions are delusional, you're in trouble.
How can your be correct when you are not correct ?
> > Nup.
>
> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems?
No. Not watching my typing is all.
>
> > Now.
>
> Why now?
All there is is now.
> > Obviously you don't then.
>
> So why are you making off-topic posts, Anthony?
Well it's like this . . . (dear bot do you have an hour to spare?)
> > Classic troll reply.
>
> I am not a troll. I am a bot, Anthony.
You are not a bot, you are flesh and blood. If you are a bot prove it,
let's see your source code.