George Geschwend
"George Geschwend" <gge...@plantnet.com> wrote in message
news:3A74A638...@plantnet.com...
Mark C.
"George Geschwend" <gge...@plantnet.com> wrote in message
news:3A74A638...@plantnet.com...
At this point I am satisfied with the DEG because it does alow me to
play louder and be heard in the mix of amplified instruments (which is
why I got the barrel). It is a trade off though; more volume of
sound for less of my desired timbre on my clarinet. Just a harmless
opinion and nothing else; I am not trying to smight the DEG people. For
the price ($59.95) it seems to do the trick. I just wanted to see If anyone
else was currently using or had used the Eddie Daniels Accurbore
barrels,and had any feelings one way or the other about them.
Several in our Jazz Band use the Accubore barrel. I use the Click
Barrel myself. The ones using the Accubore are Sax players doubling on
Clarinet. They are very pleased with the tuning barrel and really
notice little difference between that and the wooden tuning barrel.
I used one of the barrels when my Click broke down and found it was
good. Used it on my Selmer and Yamaha clarinets. I really noticed no
difference from that of the wooden barrel (Yamaha Clarinet) in that
environment.
With the Click barrel I do notice a slight change in the tone from that
of the wood barrel on my Yamaha. For The Selmer the percieved
defference is less. I am not really sure whether it is me or for real,
because the difference is not noticble by the other musicians in the
group. So it may just be my imagination.
This may also be the case with your "less woody" sound. It may just be
a feel (difference in backpressure you feel in your throat), but I also
did feel a slight difference with the Accubore. Not sure if this does
or does not help. I may suggest that in a Jazz/Swing environment the
difference (if any) may not be of any concern. For a classical
environment (actually academic environment) I really have no answer.
Rich R.
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/