Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

*** BATTLE KAT: Kat Marco vs. The Great Kat ***

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Chuck

unread,
Mar 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/17/99
to
Well dammit, there goes my vote! :)

Chuck.

On Wed, 17 Mar 1999 17:16:53 GMT, bri...@kuci.org (Brian MacDonald)
wrote:

>(Kat from Babes In Toyland unavailable for competition)


Ned Raggett

unread,
Mar 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/17/99
to
Brian MacDonald wrote:
>
> I put it to you.... which of the following is the more rocking Kat on
> alt.music.alternative?

If we're going to do this Iron Chef style, I simply *have* to be
the flamboyant host Kaga, of course. With the Great Kat as the
house champion and the other one as the desperately out of her
league challenger...

*rips away cloth to showcase a Flying V guitar rising out of the
depths, surrounded by light, as the majestic chorus swells*

BEGIN BATTLE KAT!

> Kat Marco -- www.goddessofrock.com ?
>
> or
>
> The Great Kat -- www.greatkat.com ?

My vote is, of course, already cast for the Bloody Vivaldi, for
these reasons:

1) She's from Swindon, England -- home of XTC and Meat Beat
Manifesto. Must be something in the water.

2) Clearly she has both immmense self-confidence and a sense of
humor about herself -- something not yet evident with the other.

3) Whereas Kat Marco is content to Photoshop in wannabe 'spooky'
eye effects, the Great Kat willingly douses herself with red
liquids and other things for the full cheesy effect.

4) Two words: EXCLAMATION POINTS!!!!!!!

5) She hasn't felt the need to talk about any connections to
the likes of Collective Soul to justify her work.

6) Kat Marco claims she is the goddess of rock, but as the
brief soundclip on her site clearly states, the Great Kat is
simply "God!" She doesn't need any modifying phrases to make
her point.

7) Kat Marco's graphics are of supposedly moody and spooky
panthers and roses. The Great Kat uses an image of the death mask
of Beethoven. *Much* cooler in context.

8) Finally, she doesn't need to post horrible ads and promo
pieces and bring in 'supporters' who probably are aliases in
disguise for the most part in order to get further attention to
herself -- she doesn't even need to post anything at all! She
is the Great Kat, the sublime and eternal.

Ned
ned truly, deeply, madly in love with this nutty thread at kuci.org

Queen...@webtv.net

unread,
Mar 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/18/99
to

Stand and Deliver!

Rock On!

Rockat Records Kat Marco

Join Kat Marco on her Maiden
Voyage!

Ned Raggett

unread,
Mar 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/18/99
to
Queen...@webtv.net wrote:
>
> Kat and Ned, sitting in a tree, k-i-s-s-i-n-g

Eurgh, no thanks. I'd have to listen to your attempts at love songs,
for a start.

> Kat
> kat amuzed at how much attention she gets from nerd of newsgroup here at
> goddessofrock.com

*This* is an insult? Six year olds do better! Try again or
don't bother. But I am flattered to note that you have been so
taken with me as to lamely copy my current style of sig file,
though the feeling is hardly mutual.

Ned
ned noting you really can't polish a turd at kuci.org

Matthew Maxwell

unread,
Mar 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/18/99
to
In article <10023-36...@newsd-131.iap.bryant.webtv.net>,
Queen...@webtv.net wrote:

> Kat and Ned, sitting in a tree, k-i-s-s-i-n-g

Mmmmmm....let me get my HI-8 camera and record this
for posteriority.

> Kat
> kat amuzed at how much attention she gets from nerd of newsgroup here at

Is that really the best you could do? I mean, i had
such high hopes for you holding your own, going toe
to toe, trading barbs with Mr. Ned and maybe even
holding your own for awhile (if nothing else, then
in sheer amusement factor alone). And then you have
to go and do this, blowing any chance you had of
becoming a respected adversary. Now you're merely
part of the chattering rabble.

It is indeed a sad, sad day. Hang your heads down.
De-rat your hair and wear suitably somber shades
of lipstick and mascara. Put your best contacts in
and pull out the blackest of spandex. For today
we mourn the passing of one who has brought us
so very much and asked so little of us in return.

USEnet will never be the same.

Stifling the flood of tears as i write this,

Matt

--
mmax...@nospam.san.rr.com
"Sea monkeys are NOT PRIMATES!" -- Max, of Sam and Max

remove 'nospam' to reply

Ned Raggett

unread,
Mar 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/18/99
to
Matthew Maxwell wrote:
>
> Mmmmmm....let me get my HI-8 camera and record this
> for posteriority.

You shouldn't be so anal about such things.

> ...For today


> we mourn the passing of one who has brought us
> so very much and asked so little of us in return.

Fear not -- there's always HELLION in the house.

> Stifling the flood of tears as i write this,

There there, there'll be other musicians with delusions of grandeur
yet!

Ned
ned offering poor Matthew a shoulder to cry on at kuci.org

Matthew Maxwell

unread,
Mar 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/18/99
to
In article <36F130...@SPAMNOTkuci.org>, Ned Raggett
<n...@SPAMNOTkuci.org> wrote:

> You shouldn't be so anal about such things.

Hey, i just wanted to save the moment. Aren't
you behind me on this?

> Fear not -- there's always HELLION in the house.

You're just trying to make me feel better. I don't
think it's gonna work.

> There there, there'll be other musicians with delusions of grandeur
> yet!

But none with her je ne sais quoi, her joie de vivre.
It just won't be the same. She came and went so quickly,
burning like a bright star in the firmament. But in the
immortal words of Def Leppard (or was it Thin Lizzie?)
"Tis better to burn out..."

Nicole

unread,
Mar 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/18/99
to

Ned Raggett wrote:
>
> Queen...@webtv.net wrote:
> >
> > Kat and Ned, sitting in a tree, k-i-s-s-i-n-g
>

> Eurgh, no thanks. I'd have to listen to your attempts at love songs,
> for a start.

Maybe that's what the red eyes are there for - they're brimming over
with *love*.



> > Kat
> > kat amuzed at how much attention she gets from nerd of newsgroup here at

> > goddessofrock.com
>
> *This* is an insult? Six year olds do better! Try again or
> don't bother. But I am flattered to note that you have been so
> taken with me as to lamely copy my current style of sig file,
> though the feeling is hardly mutual.

That's too bad, it seems Kat is quite taken with you, what with the
insults and the imitation and all...you could make such beautiful music
together! ;-)

Nicole

Ned Raggett

unread,
Mar 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/18/99
to
Nicole wrote:
>
> Maybe that's what the red eyes are there for - they're brimming over
> with *love*.

In which case I *would* rather prefer demonic possession!

> That's too bad, it seems Kat is quite taken with you, what with the
> insults and the imitation and all...you could make such beautiful music
> together! ;-)

At least I know I have no immediate musical ability and wisely do
not inflict whatever I could come up with on the public.

Ned
ned thanking heavens for small mercies at kuci.org

Ned Raggett

unread,
Mar 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/18/99
to
Matthew Maxwell wrote:
>
> Hey, i just wanted to save the moment. Aren't
> you behind me on this?

I fear your desire to capture all on film rears its ugly head again.

> You're just trying to make me feel better. I don't
> think it's gonna work.

Perfection is impossible, even on a.m.a.



> But none with her je ne sais quoi, her joie de vivre.
> It just won't be the same. She came and went so quickly,
> burning like a bright star in the firmament. But in the
> immortal words of Def Leppard (or was it Thin Lizzie?)
> "Tis better to burn out..."

Yes, but she only followed the impulse to burn out -- not much
more.

Ned
ned wondering whatever will happen next at kuci.org

Matthew Maxwell

unread,
Mar 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/18/99
to
In article <36F143...@SPAMNOTkuci.org>, Ned Raggett
<n...@SPAMNOTkuci.org> wrote:

> I fear your desire to capture all on film rears its ugly head again.

Video, actually. Straight to digital manipulation. But let
us pass this ugly business and wipe up afterwards. After
we wouldn't want stink the place up.

> Perfection is impossible, even on a.m.a.

"But like fools, we must keep on trying. Eh, Mr. Burton?"

> Yes, but she only followed the impulse to burn out -- not much
> more.

But she leaves behind a magnificent corpse.

Rockat...@webtv.net

unread,
Mar 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/18/99
to

Ned Raggett

unread,
Mar 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/18/99
to
Rockat...@webtv.net wrote:
>
> Mr. Naggett :) has mistakenly stated that we have a brief soundclip
> at our website,

Amusing since I don't recall saying specifically that --
but if I did, the mistake was inadvertant, if that somehow makes
you feel happy. Clip or full song, my opinion remains the
same -- sucks rocks on toast.

And as for inverting the letters of my name -- gosh, *so*
cutting!

Ned
ned bemused that it has all come to this at kuci.org

Queen...@webtv.net

unread,
Mar 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/19/99
to

Stand and Deliver!

Rock On!

Rockat Records Kat Marco

Join Kat Marco on her Maiden
Voyage!

Queen...@webtv.net

unread,
Mar 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/19/99
to

Persi

unread,
Mar 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/19/99
to
In article <11982-36F...@newsd-131.iap.bryant.webtv.net>,
Queen...@webtv.net says...

>Ah your just jealous, cause you want me.
>~+smile+~

Want you to leave, maybe.

--
In My CD Changer/Stereo:

Aphex Twin - Windowlicker EP
The Roots Vol 4: Things Fall Apart
Spiritualized - Live At The Royal Albert Hall

Film:
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels
October Sky









Queen...@webtv.net

unread,
Mar 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/19/99
to

Nicole

unread,
Mar 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/19/99
to

Queen...@webtv.net wrote:
>
> Ah your just jealous, cause you want me.
> ~+smile+~

No, that's where you're wrong -- I just want to be like you! I've
ordered a pair of red colored contacts, and had the hairdressers frost
my hair and style it a la Jill Munroe from Charlies Angels. This has
already improved my image significantly, believe me...

thanks for the name, btw...

Ned Raggett

unread,
Mar 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/19/99
to
Queen...@webtv.net wrote:
>
> Words of wisdom from the Nerd Of The Newsgroup.

I must say, your increasing bitterness over this all isn't pretty.

Ned
ned easing into another Friday at work at kuci.org

Ned Raggett

unread,
Mar 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/19/99
to
Nicole wrote:
>
> No, that's where you're wrong -- I just want to be like you!

Steady on. ;-)

> thanks for the name, btw...

She actually makes you sound like a replacement for Leia. Imagine
Tom "Solo" Ewing and Ned Raggettwalker, with the assistance of C-3Dexo
and Persi-D2, as well as the sage advice of ML Kenobi and the hirsute
strength of Jackiebacca, breaking into Darth Marco's Death of Music Star
[Darth Marco's voice provided by a series of incompetent voiceovers from
fellow Dark Lords of Webtv.net] to rescue you from a cruel fate and to
ensure that Emperor Midnight stops vaporizing innocent Usenet newsgroups
with her ads. Co-starring Lando Maxwellian and Yoda Macdonald;
definitely not coming to a theater near you.

Ned
ned hardly believing he just wrote all this at kuci.org

Goddes...@webtv.net

unread,
Mar 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/19/99
to

Ned Raggett

unread,
Mar 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/19/99
to
Queen...@webtv.net wrote:
>
> Ned you have given this far too much attention.

Scratching posts like you are useful. Have you ever thought about
ignoring me? You might actually find that to your advantage --
because, as I've said before, if you're so insecure as to waste
your time bothering with someone who obviously will never care for
your useless music as opposed to dealing with those people who
actually like it, then why do what you do?

> Anyone can see that you
> are infatuated.

With my girlfriend Theresa, yes indeed. With yourself, rather
doubtful.

Ned
ned wondering idly when it will indeed all end at kuci.org

Goddes...@webtv.net

unread,
Mar 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/19/99
to

Princess Dragon Nicole

unread,
Mar 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/19/99
to

That was brilliant; but, given the silliness of the whole affair, I
think the story of Princess Dragon Mom is much more appropriate ;-)

Nicole

Ned Raggett

unread,
Mar 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/19/99
to
Princess Dragon Nicole wrote:
>
> That was brilliant; but, given the silliness of the whole affair, I
> think the story of Princess Dragon Mom is much more appropriate ;-)

Franks -- Princess Dragon Mom *is* a useful side alternative, but
I preferred a story where the princess was on the good side, as
is clear in this case. ;-)

Ned
ned thinking about this and that at kuci.org

Matthew Maxwell

unread,
Mar 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/19/99
to
In article <29270-36...@newsd-132.iap.bryant.webtv.net>,
Goddes...@webtv.net wrote:

> BTW I'm thinking purple eyes next, what do you think?

That's so Liz Taylor. So 1966. Go with Marilyn Manson
white or not at all.

> Rock On! Kat

Meow!

--Lando

JackieBlue

unread,
Mar 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/19/99
to
Ned Raggett <n...@SPAMNOTkuci.org> wrote:

> She actually makes you sound like a replacement for Leia. Imagine
> Tom "Solo" Ewing and Ned Raggettwalker, with the assistance of C-3Dexo
> and Persi-D2, as well as the sage advice of ML Kenobi and the hirsute
> strength of Jackiebacca,

No. I'd rather be Jackie Fett or something.

---
You fucking absurd pronoun you fucking third beer bottle.
Rev. Jack Godsey.
http://members.tripod.com/~spill/index.html

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

Ned Raggett

unread,
Mar 19, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/19/99
to
JackieBlue wrote:
>
> No. I'd rather be Jackie Fett or something.

Never a problem -- though keep in mind that means you're allied with
the dark forces of Darth Marco, so reconsider. ;-)

Ned
ned happy to always rewrite the rules at kuci.org

Persi

unread,
Mar 20, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/20/99
to
In article <mmaxwell-180...@dt025n60.san.rr.com>, mmax...@san.rr.com
says...

>But in the
>immortal words of Def Leppard (or was it Thin Lizzie?)
>"Tis better to burn out..."

That would be Neil Young.

Matthew Maxwell

unread,
Mar 20, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/20/99
to
In article <7cvefi$gat$1...@holly.prod.itd.earthlink.net>,
cow...@NOSPAN.earthlink.net (Persi) wrote:

> That would be Neil Young.

Yea, verily.

> In My CD Changer/Stereo:

> Spiritualized - Live At The Royal Albert Hall

So, how is this, anyways? Keep in mind that i
think Jason suffers from "keep it in the studio
too long" syndrome (as does his former cohort
Mr. Boom).

JackieBlue

unread,
Mar 20, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/20/99
to
Ned Raggett <n...@SPAMNOTkuci.org> wrote:
> JackieBlue wrote:
> >
> > No. I'd rather be Jackie Fett or something.
>
> Never a problem -- though keep in mind that means you're allied with
> the dark forces of Darth Marco, so reconsider. ;-)

So would Geir be Yoda then? Y'know, a weird little man that doesn't make a
lot of sense?


np:Bardo Pond, "Green Man" (yes it is, man)

Persi

unread,
Mar 21, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/21/99
to
In article <36F277...@SPAMNOTkuci.org>, n...@SPAMNOTkuci.org says...

>
>Queen...@webtv.net wrote:
>>
>> Words of wisdom from the Nerd Of The Newsgroup.
>
>I must say, your increasing bitterness over this all isn't pretty.

Yeah, what's wrong with being a nerd anyways? I'm a self-professed music and
film geek and DAMN proud of it. I'd rather be a nerd in the eyes of Kat's blind
followers than adhere to the awful sounds of her so-called music.

--
In My CD Changer/Stereo:

Coldcut - Kiss FM Mix
Aerial M - Live in Belgium 1998
Decoder - Dissected

Empress Midnight

unread,
Mar 22, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/22/99
to

Ned 'the Nanite' Raggett

unread,
Mar 22, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/22/99
to
Empress Midnight wrote:
>
> Not at all! We have not been bitter.

Nice attempt at spin, but you know, it rings hollow. Like everything
else you do.

> You have to know that we realize that extreme reactions
> are only present where potential is and we are very excited about that.

You mean you're more happy over me trashing you than whatever praise
you've received up until now? Sad, in truth. And yes, you have the
potential -- to sink even deeper into the silly mire you've made for
yourself, so enjoy.

> Kat doens't really think that Ned is a shithead.
> No! She calls him way worse names than that! :)

Distinctly unsweet. And boring, and obvious, and everything else about
you two.

Ned
ned convinced these two can't decide how to deal with me at all at kuci.org

Goddes...@webtv.net

unread,
Mar 23, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/23/99
to

Ned Raggett

unread,
Mar 23, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/23/99
to
Goddes...@webtv.net wrote:
>
> No Ned we haven't decided what we are going to do with you yet, But we
> are having alot of fun thinking about it!

It's nice to know I can waste your time without even doing anything.

> kat leaving the rest to imagination here at GoddessOfRock.com

...and as for imagination, I don't see much there if all you can do
is weakly parody whatever it is I do.

Ned
ned wondering if they stay up nights worrying about this at kuci.org

Queen...@webtv.net

unread,
Mar 24, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/24/99
to

Rock On!

Rockat Records Kat Marco

Join Kat Marco on her Maiden
Voyage!

Tom Ewing

unread,
Mar 24, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/24/99
to
Queen...@webtv.net wrote:


>--WebTV-Mail-1807069058-7685
>Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

>Radio vs Labels
>What would a DJ have to gain by trying to slander a Label or a musical
>artist?
>Plenty. Especially if that label or artist is on the internet with mp3
>downloads.
>What would a DJ have to lose if the need for radio diminishes due to the
>internets offering of mp3? Plenty.

Except for the fact that Ned works as a librarian or something and is
a DJ as a *hobby*. D'oh! (Anyway, trust me, the backhanders we get
offered by The Man for slating you really *aren't* enough to worry
about.)

Never mind, Queen Paranoia. Try this one: I work in market research,
I've sadly never worked for any media-related clients, and I love
MP3s. Yet somehow I still think your stuff is rubbish. What vested
interest am I serving by saying that, eh?

Cheers,
Tom.


Goddes...@webtv.net

unread,
Mar 24, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/24/99
to

Nicole

unread,
Mar 24, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/24/99
to

Goddes...@webtv.net wrote:
>
> Oh Tom you think alot of good music is rubbish, so your opinion
> therefore is rubbish.

Oh, now there's a reasonable line of thought.

> Besides you write reviews for music publication,
> so you are concidered a part of the music industry that stands to be
> effected by the new music business.

Tom mainly writes his own independent stuff, as far as I know; where
exactly do you see a vested interest in things (like dj-ing and writing)
that are done out of love rather than profit?

>You reviewers are just like DJ's, in
> that you think you are more important than the music.

Er, no actually; speaking only for myself (and my own cack handed
efforts at writing and dj-ing), I only ever did anything like
writing,etc. because I loved the music and wanted to let people know
about stuff they might not otherwise hear about. You seem to view anyone
even remotely related to the music industry as being money-grubbing
egomaniacs. I think this says a lot more about your motivations than
anyone elses...

> The classic out for anyone who doesn't wish to be exposed is to use
> psyco terms, like delusional, or paronoid. I am luring you out of the
> dark and into the light.

Of course this isn't delusional at all. To thing I've been so wrong
*sob*....

> This war is and has been between one person,
> Ned, the DJ, his alias's, and perhaps a few newsgroupies he has called
> into subjection,

It's fun being called into subjection, you should try it sometime!
Jackie has laundry duty, Joe sweep's Ned's floor, Matt gets to weed the
backyard, while Tom is usually responsible for the hoovering. Me, I do
the dishes.

> and myself, the one who has been attacked.

IIRC, you seem to instigate most of the attacking; you cannot take
criticism without launching into personal attacks and enlisting your
webtv friends to "help" you. Not that it's worked very well, in fact
it's been pretty hilarious so far, but still...

> The upset music industry is not a paronoid delusion, it is a fact, and
> anytime anyone that is a music business person, attacks an artist, it
> will be concidered a part of the war for dominance.

Wasn't that an episode of Xena?

cheers,

Nicole

JackieBlue

unread,
Mar 24, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/24/99
to
Kat Marco wrote:

> What would a DJ have to lose if the need for radio diminishes due to the
> internets offering of mp3? Plenty.

Yeah but... why would mp3's affect the need for radio? I mean, really...
people mostly listen to the radio in their car or at work or whatever... it's
not like they're likely to fire up their computer and construct an mp3
playlist for their background music. People will always listen to the radio.


np:Jenny Owen Youngs, "Jackie" (Yes, a song about me. My legacy is now more
famous than I am. How sad.)

keyse...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
Mar 24, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/24/99
to
In article <25178-36...@newsd-131.iap.bryant.webtv.net>,

Goddes...@webtv.net wrote:
> Oh Tom you think alot of good music is rubbish, so your opinion
> therefore is rubbish.

Actually miss Metal, Tom's one of the few AMA regulars who knows what he's
talking about, but you're right he does listen to a lot of rubbish.;p

> Besides you write reviews for music publication,
> so you are concidered a part of the music industry that stands to be
> effected by the new music business.

You write for Melody Maker, Tom-boy? Come clean now. I write reviews
sometimes myself, but I don't get paid for it. So I guess it's not really a
business venture as much as hobby. I know this all probably sounds
incredibly alien to a young, business minded, go-getter like yourself...but
oh well.

> You reviewers are just like DJ's, in
> that you think you are more important than the music.

> The classic out for anyone who doesn't wish to be exposed is to use
> psyco terms, like delusional, or paronoid. I am luring you out of the
> dark and into the light.

So have you ever encountered reality? "The classic out"? *rolling*

> This war is and has been between one person,
> Ned, the DJ, his alias's, and perhaps a few newsgroupies he has called

> into subjection, and myself, the one who has been attacked.

War...hehe...i think the word you're looking for is annihilation, but really
it's all just entertainment.

> The upset music industry is not a paronoid delusion, it is a fact, and
> anytime anyone that is a music business person, attacks an artist, it
> will be concidered a part of the war for dominance.

> To Be Continued....
>

Oh boy...can't wait. Ned, or anyone for that matter, could probably give a
flying turd about what one hopeless, self percieved arteest thinks. Yet I'm
sure he reads each one of your posts with a dumbfounded fascination. Isn't
that ironical? your pal, key

Matthew Maxwell

unread,
Mar 24, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/24/99
to

> Oh Tom you think alot of good music is rubbish, so your opinion
> therefore is rubbish.

Kat, please do the world a favor and look up 'tautology'. Thanks.

> Besides you write reviews for music publication,
> so you are concidered a part of the music industry that stands to be
> effected by the new music business.

Besides, you write press releases for the Internet, so
you are concidered to be a part of the music industry that


stands to be effected by the new music business.

Ha.

Hey, Kat, i write reviews for a local zine that doesn't
pay me squat. Not nickel one. Does this invalidate
my opinion, too? Don't say it does, because then
i'd feel just _worthless_. I'd have to go shoot myself
or something.

> You reviewers are just like DJ's, in
> that you think you are more important than the music.

I am the DJ. I am what i play. Frankly, DJs are part
of the music (and so are reviewers). Ignore them if
you like, but it won't change a thing. I know it doesn't
work for me. But then i dropped my radio down the toilet
after Van Halen III came out.



> The classic out for anyone who doesn't wish to be exposed is to use
> psyco terms, like delusional, or paronoid.

You know, i can't even make fun of this sentence. Please
rewrite it for clarity so that i may subject it to a proper
thrashing. Hugs 'n kisses.

> I am luring you out of the dark and into the light.

Oh, not the light! Oh no! Anything but that! I mean
it'll shrivel my pale goth-nerd-like skin! I'll wither
away like one of those vampires in a cheap horror movie
where they don't even have the budget for the old
baking soda and vinegar foam, rather they just sorta
cut away from the vampire and you see a little cheap
smoke and hear some gurgling. That's what'd happen
to me. Please don't do it.

> This war is and has been between one person,

War? Oh, dear. This is serious. Hmmm, persecution,
delusions of grandeur, paranoia, nonsensical mutterings.
Professional help. Yes, that's what we need here.
A little professional help. Are there any Jungians
in the audience? I'm afraid that Freudians would
just be a bit too direct about this. A little subtlety
is called for. If someone would only step forward and
listen to this cry for help.

> Ned, the DJ, his alias's, and perhaps a few newsgroupies he has called
> into subjection, and myself, the one who has been attacked.

Hey, didja hear that? I'm an alias of Ned! Gee,
i thought there was something funny about me the
whole time. I felt kinda....incomplete. Well,
that explains it. I'm just a construct of someone
else's imagination. Right, then. Check please.

> The upset music industry is not a paronoid delusion, it is a fact, and
> anytime anyone that is a music business person, attacks an artist, it
> will be concidered a part of the war for dominance.

Oooh....dominance.... Should i get my leathers? I'll have
to see if that gift certificate from The Gauntlet is still
good. And to quote Bruce Sterling, the music industry is
about as much threat as an 800-pound gorilla on fire. Face
it. We can't be stopped. Those who control the internet
control the universe! Those who post to newsgroups will
hold the keys to the unravelling of the universal space-
time continuum! Our time has come! Kat is our herald!

> To Be Continued....

I can't wait! This is _so_ entertaining.

--Lando (an alias of Ned)

Tom Ewing

unread,
Mar 24, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/24/99
to
Goddes...@webtv.net wrote:


>--WebTV-Mail-1804032859-1753


>Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

>Oh Tom you think alot of good music is rubbish, so your opinion
>therefore is rubbish.

Well, I can't argue with that.

> Besides you write reviews for music publication,
>so you are concidered a part of the music industry that stands to be
>effected by the new music business.

1) The reviews I write are different how from the reviews you quote on
your webpage?
2) I've almost never been 'published': I write unpaid reviews as a
hobby - I find it more rewarding than putting ships in bottles. If
that makes me part of the music industry so be it, but your suggestion
strikes me as a bit of a reach.

> You reviewers are just like DJ's, in
>that you think you are more important than the music.

Well, yes, in that if I was having to save myself or my CDs from a
fire, I'd probably let the CDs fry.



>The classic out for anyone who doesn't wish to be exposed is to use
>psyco terms, like delusional, or paronoid.

Kat, believe me I am not accusing you of being clinically paranoid. Is
"silly" a psycho term?

> I am luring you out of the

>dark and into the light. This war is and has been between one person,


>Ned, the DJ, his alias's, and perhaps a few newsgroupies he has called
>into subjection, and myself, the one who has been attacked.

>The upset music industry is not a paronoid delusion, it is a fact, and
>anytime anyone that is a music business person, attacks an artist, it
>will be concidered a part of the war for dominance.

Let me see if I've figured this out. Ned is a DJ who uses his show to
disseminate (unpaid AFAIK) what he thinks is new and interesting
music. You are an artist making what you think is new and interesting
music. You advertise in our newsgroup. Ned hears the music, thinks it
is dreadful and tells you so. That's his prerogative, just as it's
your prerogative to make and distribute the music.

Your allegations that DJs must hate MP3s are absurd: in that case, why
don't DJs wage a secret war against CD manufacture, since pre-recorded
CDs take a lot more listeners away from radio than MP3s do? The two
things are simply not in competition.

>To Be Continued....

I would pray otherwise.

Tom.


Ned Raggett

unread,
Mar 24, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/24/99
to
Goddes...@webtv.net wrote:
>
> I am luring you out of the
> dark and into the light.

Well, I wear black on the outside because black is how I feel on
the inside myself, but that's just me.

> This war is and has been between one person,
> Ned, the DJ, his alias's, and perhaps a few newsgroupies he has called
> into subjection, and myself, the one who has been attacked.

Either Key or JackieBlue said something elsewhere about how I
read your messages with dumbfounded fascination at your amazing
cluelessness. And you know, were they ever right.

And I have no need to call anyone into subjection -- like moths
to a flame, they cluster around my brilliance. ;-)

[This is called 'sarcasm,' as opposed to 'sarcasim' -- I have
pointed it out to you before, but you have problems accepting
the fact that it exists, apparently.]

Ned
ned still slogging through a work mess somewhat at kuci.org

Matthew Maxwell

unread,
Mar 24, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/24/99
to
In article <36F92245...@vanilli.umich.edu>, Nicole
<ni...@vanilli.umich.edu> wrote:

> It's fun being called into subjection, you should try it sometime!
> Jackie has laundry duty, Joe sweep's Ned's floor, Matt gets to weed the
> backyard, while Tom is usually responsible for the hoovering. Me, I do
> the dishes.

And it's a _big_ backyard. Speaking of which, i should be
out feeding the wildebeasts.

> Wasn't that an episode of Xena?

I think that you're thinking of _Project Blue Book_, actually.

--Lando (still just an alias of Ned. Notice
how we're never both in the same room at the same time.)

Ned Raggett

unread,
Mar 24, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/24/99
to
Matthew Maxwell wrote:
>
> Hey, didja hear that? I'm an alias of Ned!

Then what the hell am *I* doing talking to myself?

As always, you rock, my friend.

Ned
ned wasting the last of his lunch break time at kuci.org

Ned Raggett

unread,
Mar 24, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/24/99
to
Matthew Maxwell wrote:
>
> --Lando (still just an alias of Ned. Notice
> how we're never both in the same room at the same time.)

What are you talking about? I'm right here and so am I!

Neds
ned ned theoretically theoretically at at kuci kuci . . org org

Matthew Maxwell

unread,
Mar 24, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/24/99
to
In article <36F95E...@SPAMNOTkuci.org>, Ned Raggett
<n...@SPAMNOTkuci.org> wrote:

> Then what the hell am *I* doing talking to myself?

Multiple personality disorder. Probably from being a DJ so
long.

> As always, you rock, my friend.

Only if it's "Roooooooooooooock!"

--Lando (who's looking to secede)

Tom Ewing

unread,
Mar 24, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/24/99
to
keyse...@my-dejanews.com wrote:

>> Oh Tom you think alot of good music is rubbish, so your opinion
>> therefore is rubbish.

>Actually miss Metal, Tom's one of the few AMA regulars who knows what he's


>talking about, but you're right he does listen to a lot of rubbish.;p

Actually I think that all the a.m.a. regulars except one or two
obvious exceptions know what they're talking about. In some cases they
know a bit too much. ;)

>> Besides you write reviews for music publication,
>> so you are concidered a part of the music industry that stands to be
>> effected by the new music business.

>You write for Melody Maker, Tom-boy?

Nope. I've written one thing ever for money (a fucking awful Cluster
piece in 'The Rough Guide To Rock') and they didn't pay me.

>Oh boy...can't wait. Ned, or anyone for that matter, could probably give a
>flying turd about what one hopeless, self percieved arteest thinks.

I want more celebrities on a.m.a.

Cheers,
Tom.


Tom Ewing

unread,
Mar 24, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/24/99
to
mmax...@san.rr.com (Matthew Maxwell) wrote:

>> Oh Tom you think alot of good music is rubbish, so your opinion
>> therefore is rubbish.

>Kat, please do the world a favor and look up 'tautology'. Thanks.

Silly Matt. She looked that one up when writing "Rebel Renegade". Or
is that oxy,moron?

Cheers,
Tom.


Goddes...@webtv.net

unread,
Mar 24, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/24/99
to

Tom Ewing

unread,
Mar 24, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/24/99
to
Goddes...@webtv.net wrote:


>--WebTV-Mail-243880454-6


>Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

>Oh yes we are having fun now, however I need to hear from Ned's other
>alias's too! Don't tire on me now Ned!
>It wouldn't be fair for me to go on without telling you that I truely
>think you have possibilities, and that I am having great fun......But
>that you come to my beckon far too easily, and what I desire to know is
>coming to me in such a fashion as I have manipulated. So please speak!
>Your words are a mirror. And I have enjoyed spinning you into my web,
>for I am the spider, and you are the fly.

I think we can say at this point that your name will truly live for
ever as long as a.m.a. endures. Certainly I consider myself proud to
have contributed to this thread.

Cheers,
Ned.
(np: Creedence Clearwater Revival - "Run Through The Jungle".
Creedence rock, dude.)


Michael Daddino

unread,
Mar 24, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/24/99
to
Tom Ewing wrote:
>
> Nope. I've written one thing ever for money (a fucking awful Cluster
> piece in 'The Rough Guide To Rock') and they didn't pay me.

OMIGOD! I've read that online! I'm your biggest faaaannn.....

> I want more celebrities on a.m.a.

Let's see...I have a cousin who played in Cyndi Lauper's first band, and
a aunt who was an interior designer for Peter Frampton. Does this excite
anybody? Should I check if they have internet access?

--Mike

Cultural Artifact of the Moment: Frank Crumit, "Abdul Abulbul Amir"
(Hilariously elegant yarn about a Turk and a Russian warrior who kill
each other over some stupifying minor accident. What on earth happened
to the novelty hit, may I ask?)

JDG

unread,
Mar 24, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/24/99
to

Tom Ewing wrote:

> Goddes...@webtv.net wrote:
>
> >--WebTV-Mail-243880454-6
> >Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
>
> >Oh yes we are having fun now, however I need to hear from Ned's other
> >alias's too! Don't tire on me now Ned!
> >It wouldn't be fair for me to go on without telling you that I truely
> >think you have possibilities, and that I am having great fun......But
> >that you come to my beckon far too easily, and what I desire to know is
> >coming to me in such a fashion as I have manipulated. So please speak!
> >Your words are a mirror. And I have enjoyed spinning you into my web,
> >for I am the spider, and you are the fly.

Im getting confused, is she a spider or a Kat? And is she spinning
a web for food, or just free advertising?
JDG


keyse...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
Mar 25, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/25/99
to
In article <36F99AEC...@ibm.net>,

mra...@ibm.net wrote:
> Tom Ewing wrote:
> >
> > Nope. I've written one thing ever for money (a fucking awful Cluster
> > piece in 'The Rough Guide To Rock') and they didn't pay me.
>
> OMIGOD! I've read that online! I'm your biggest faaaannn.....
>
haha...I've read that too...wasn't *that* bad...actually I thought it was very
informative.

> > I want more celebrities on a.m.a.
>
> Let's see...I have a cousin who played in Cyndi Lauper's first band, and
> a aunt who was an interior designer for Peter Frampton. Does this excite
> anybody? Should I check if they have internet access?
>
One of my second cousins was a roadie with the Dead for like 15 years. And I
once shook John Paul Jones' hand (interrupting Mathew Sweet in the
process)...god that was great. Too bad I drooled on his wingtips.

key

> Cultural Artifact of the Moment: Frank Crumit, "Abdul Abulbul Amir"
> (Hilariously elegant yarn about a Turk and a Russian warrior who kill
> each other over some stupifying minor accident. What on earth happened
> to the novelty hit, may I ask?)
>

This sounds pretty damn nifty.

Persi

unread,
Mar 25, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/25/99
to
In article <12054-36...@newsd-133.iap.bryant.webtv.net>,
Goddes...@webtv.net says...

>Oh yes we are having fun now, however I need to hear from Ned's other
>alias's too! Don't tire on me now Ned!

Oh fine, we couldn't fool the almighty KAT! The cat's (pun intended) out of the
bag....yes indeed.....we are all Ned. Tom, Nicole, Michael, me, etc.

C'mon, Ned, it's time to tell our ole' friend Kat the truth. We are part of
a multi-functioning mainframe that exists as different posters on the same
frequency. It's been tough cloaking our experiment, but it's obvious that no
one can outsmart the 'Great' Kat Marco!

--
In My Stereo/PC:

Q-Chastic - Cat002
Looper - Up A Tree
Decoder - Dissected










Tom Ewing

unread,
Mar 25, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/25/99
to
keyse...@my-dejanews.com wrote:

>In article <36F99AEC...@ibm.net>,
> mra...@ibm.net wrote:
>> Tom Ewing wrote:
>> >
>> > Nope. I've written one thing ever for money (a fucking awful Cluster
>> > piece in 'The Rough Guide To Rock') and they didn't pay me.
>>
>> OMIGOD! I've read that online! I'm your biggest faaaannn.....
>>
>haha...I've read that too...wasn't *that* bad...actually I thought it was very
>informative.

The amusing thing about that piece (which says something about the RG
to R) was that 24 hours before submitting the copy I'd never knowingly
heard a single note of Cluster. The friend of mine who'd been
contracted to write it (who wrote the IMO very good Eno and Cale
sections) just didnt have time so gave me a call in the evening. I
called my workmate who I knew liked Cluster, and got him to bring his
CDs to work the next day, then the next morning secured a half day,
went home and listened to them all while writing the piece. Which was
submitted, not paid for, and stuffed full of quotes which looked like
I'd ripped the whole thing off from Cope's 'Krautrocksampler'. The
embarassing thing being that obviously I had and had made futile
efforts to disguise it.

Cheers,
Tom.


Kat's Evil Twin

unread,
Mar 25, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/25/99
to

Kat's Evil Twin

unread,
Mar 25, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/25/99
to

Kat's Evil Twin

unread,
Mar 25, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/25/99
to

Ned Raggett

unread,
Mar 25, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/25/99
to
Kat's Evil Twin wrote:
>
> Well you sure fell into that one Persi, now we know how you think when
> Ned accuses others of having alias's!

Meaning he demonstrates a sense of humor, something you are
utterly incapable of? Such folly of him to fall into *that* trap.

Ned
ned noting that you should accept no substitutes at kuci.org

Ned Raggett

unread,
Mar 25, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/25/99
to
Kat's Evil Twin wrote:
>
> Yeah thats like misspelling a word on purpose and having your spell
> checker tell you its wrong!

Obviously something you're familiar with. Especially since it
seems your apostrophe key is malfunctioning.

Ned
ned amused at Kat's inability to respond to posts in kind at kuci.org

Kat's Evil Twin

unread,
Mar 25, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/25/99
to

Matthew Maxwell

unread,
Mar 25, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/25/99
to
In article <12054-36...@newsd-133.iap.bryant.webtv.net>,
Goddes...@webtv.net wrote:

> Oh yes we are having fun now, however I need to hear from Ned's other
> alias's too! Don't tire on me now Ned!

There is no Ned. There is only LANDRU. Bow to the will
of LANDRU. Become one of The Body.

> It wouldn't be fair for me to go on without telling you that I truely
> think you have possibilities, and that I am having great fun......

You are not having fun. LANDRU is having fun with you.
There is so much that you don't know. So much that LANDRU
can teach you. But you must shed your notions of individuality
and of personality. Only then will you become one with
LANDRU. Then you will know peace.

> that you come to my beckon far too easily, and what I desire to know is
> coming to me in such a fashion as I have manipulated.

Once again the potential for verbal quip is ruined by
your refusal to write with anything resembling clarity.
Advantage: LANDRU.

> Your words are a mirror. And I have enjoyed spinning you into my web,
> for I am the spider, and you are the fly.

For you are delusional and have missed the point.

--LANDRU.

Matthew Maxwell

unread,
Mar 25, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/25/99
to
In article <7dbt1i$lko$2...@taliesin.netcom.net.uk>, eb...@netcomuk.co.uk wrote:

> I think we can say at this point that your name will truly live for
> ever as long as a.m.a. endures. Certainly I consider myself proud to
> have contributed to this thread.

Unfortunately, you've just given her what she most wants.
But since that's immortality in a relatively small and
impermanent part of USEnet, well then it's so trivial
that i suppose we can give it to her.

> (np: Creedence Clearwater Revival - "Run Through The Jungle".
> Creedence rock, dude.)

Indeed. Recent live versions of "Susie Q" played by Fogerty
still attest to that very fact.

--LANDRU

Ned Raggett

unread,
Mar 25, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/25/99
to
Kat's Evil Twin wrote:
>
[snip]

Quoting Dave Marsh? Well, *there's* your problem.

And again, you seem to suffer a misunderstanding as to what I do
with my DJ work -- namely, a 2 hour slot per week, on a volunteer
basis, done basically to satisfy my own interests and to possibly
introduce listeners to music not heard otherwise. KUCI being an
all-volunteer station in any event with absolutely no ties to commercial
radio or commercial media outlets, we are therefore hardly scared or
worried over any imminent changes there. By providing
a further option for that music, MP3 is a fine thing indeed.
I have no problem with that medium at all, and am hardly running
scared over whatever it is you're doing -- namely, producing crap
music I wouldn't play or refer people to no matter what the medium.

Ned
ned enjoying some hot chocolate at kuci.org

Matthew Maxwell

unread,
Mar 25, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/25/99
to
In article <12057-36...@newsd-132.iap.bryant.webtv.net>,

Goddes...@webtv.net (Kat's Evil Twin) wrote:

> Yeah thats like misspelling a word on purpose and having your spell
> checker tell you its wrong!

Uh, yeah. Witty. Listen, if i knew what the hell you were
talking about, then i might care.

But hey, you're at least noticing my posts now. Hey, look
everyone! I'm famous! Yippee!! I'm gonna live forever!
I'm gonna light up the stars!

Thank you Kat, for making one man's dying wish a reality.

Mark Bartlam

unread,
Mar 25, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/25/99
to
eb...@netcomuk.co.uk (Tom Ewing) wrote:

>Goddes...@webtv.net wrote:

[blah blah blah]

>>Your words are a mirror. And I have enjoyed spinning you into my web,
>>for I am the spider, and you are the fly.
>

>I think we can say at this point that your name will truly live for
>ever as long as a.m.a. endures.

Absolutely. I think Kat can feel proud to be ranked alongside such
intellectual giants as Geir, Thomas Rhombus and Heather the Garbage
fan. It really is quite an achievement.

--Mark

Tom Ewing

unread,
Mar 25, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/25/99
to
bar...@netscape.net (Mark Bartlam) wrote:

>eb...@netcomuk.co.uk (Tom Ewing) wrote:

>>Goddes...@webtv.net wrote:

>[blah blah blah]

Don't forget Tom Trauth, who I noticed popped up again in the lame
thread, Gawd bless 'im.

Cheers,
Tom.


Brian MacDonald

unread,
Mar 25, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/25/99
to
Goddes...@webtv.net wrote:
>It wouldn't be fair for me to go on without telling you that I truely
>think you have possibilities, and that I am having great fun......But

>that you come to my beckon far too easily, and what I desire to know is
>coming to me in such a fashion as I have manipulated. So please speak!

>Your words are a mirror. And I have enjoyed spinning you into my web,
>for I am the spider, and you are the fly.

No No No... What a horrible way to format lyrics to a song.
You got it all wrong.... THIS is how you do it.

"Possibilities" by Kat Marco

Intro:
[Floaty farty Yes-style prog synth noodling]

Verse 1:


It wouldn't be fair for me
to go on without telling you
that I truely think you have

Chorus:
[Chung Chunh CHUUUUNG... heavy guitar]
POO-o-o-ssibilitiEEEEEEEEEEEEEZAH YEAH!!!
and I am having great FU-U-U-U-U-U-U-Un!!

Verse 2:
But that you come to my beckon far too easily,


and what I desire to know is coming to me
in such a fashion as I have manipulated.

Chorus:
[Chung Chunh CHUUUUNG... heavy guitar]
POO-o-o-ssibilitiEEEEEEEEEEEEEZAH YEAH!!!
and I am having great FU-U-U-U-U-U-U-Un!!

ROCKIN' Bridge:
SO PLEEEEz-Uh SPE-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-AAAK!!
[Guitar solo... guitar solo.... guitar solo...guitar solo...]

Verse 3:
You words are a mirror. [Chunk chunk guitar solo lick]
And I have enjoyed spining you into my web,
for I am the spider...[extend..].. and you are the...
[pause]
FLY-Y-Y-Y-Y-Y-Y-Y-Y-Y-Y-Y-Y-Y-Y-Y-Y-Y-Y-Y-Y-Y!!!!!
ROOOOOAAARRR... YEAH!!

Chorus:
[Chung Chunh CHUUUUNG... heavy guitar]
POO-o-o-ssibilitiEEEEEEEEEEEEEZAH YEAH!!!
and I am having great FU-U-U-U-U-U-U-Un!!

Repeat Chorus:
[Chung Chunh CHUUUUNG... heavy guitar]
POO-o-o-ssibilitiEEEEEEEEEEEEEZAH YEAH!!!
and I am having great FU-U-U-U-U-U-U-Un!!

Fade out...

I am having great fun.

Good night, Cleveland. Good night, Chicago. Good night, world.
Simultaneous bow.

Ned Rag..ur, Brian MacDonald


JackieBlue

unread,
Mar 25, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/25/99
to
Goddes...@webtv.net (Kat's Evil Twin) wrote:

> dave marsh (Playboy)
> Keith Richards said recently,

Do you believe everything that Playboy and burned-out junkies tell you?

I'm sorry, record companies and radio won't go away. You can disseminate and
read text anywhere on the Internet, but book sales have only been growing in
the past few years.


np:Flying Saucer Attack, -Further- (FLYING SAUCER ATTACK is the real thing.
FLYING SAUCER ATTACK makes music for the soul. FLYING SAUCER ATTACK rocks!!!)

Rock on, metal chick.
---
You fucking absurd pronoun you fucking third beer bottle.
Rev. Jack Godsey.
http://members.tripod.com/~spill/index.html

Persi

unread,
Mar 25, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/25/99
to
In article <27189-36...@newsd-134.iap.bryant.webtv.net>,
Goddes...@webtv.net says...

>Well you sure fell into that one Persi, now we know how you think when
>Ned accuses others of having alias's!

Oh no! I shall now cover my head in shame and force myself to listen to Kat
Marco original songs for eternity. Wait a minute....I'm not worthy of such
drastic punishment.

Persi

unread,
Mar 25, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/25/99
to
In article <36fa6e33...@news.ox.ac.uk>, bar...@netscape.net says...

>
>eb...@netcomuk.co.uk (Tom Ewing) wrote:
>
>>Goddes...@webtv.net wrote:
>
>[blah blah blah]
>
>>>Your words are a mirror. And I have enjoyed spinning you into my web,
>>>for I am the spider, and you are the fly.
>>
>>I think we can say at this point that your name will truly live for
>>ever as long as a.m.a. endures.
>
>Absolutely. I think Kat can feel proud to be ranked alongside such
>intellectual giants as Geir, Thomas Rhombus and Heather the Garbage
>fan.

Don't forget Sally Kenwhaite. Didn't she make it over here a few times from
a.m.oasis? Sally always entertained me the most.

Persi

unread,
Mar 25, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/25/99
to
In article <mmaxwell-250...@dt026n3a.san.rr.com>, mmax...@san.rr.com
says...

>
>In article <12054-36...@newsd-133.iap.bryant.webtv.net>,
>Goddes...@webtv.net wrote:
>
>> Oh yes we are having fun now, however I need to hear from Ned's other
>> alias's too! Don't tire on me now Ned!
>
>There is no Ned. There is only LANDRU. Bow to the will
>of LANDRU. Become one of The Body.

Dammit, Matt! LANDRU was our last secret defense. Now you'll ruin our plans to
spread the gospel of Kat Marco to the nether regions of the planet. Oh
well....it was fun while it lasted.

Adam Glover

unread,
Mar 25, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/25/99
to
Kat's Evil Twin <Goddes...@webtv.net> wrote:
>Only a fool would pay for advertizing when all one as to do is
>post to the a.m.a!

Eureka! Record label execs everywhere have been eagerly debating
for years about the best way to capture the attention of the
elusive, highly coveted cash cow of a demographic that is the a.m.a
readership. Who'da thunk that such a simple solution was sitting
right under their noses the whole time!

--
If I had a million rocket launchers some son of a bitch
would buy you an exotic pet.
Adam Glover Toronto, Ontario, Canada
kool...@interlog.com


Persi

unread,
Mar 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/26/99
to
In article <12056-36...@newsd-132.iap.bryant.webtv.net>,
Goddes...@webtv.net says...

>'Changes are coming, Internet delivery systems such as MP3 files make it
>possible for musicians to market their works without any record label
>distribution.

Why are you telling us something that's been known for at least a year now? Or
has the whole MP3 thing actually escaped you up until now? Next thing you know,
you'll be telling us about the virtues of RealAudio.

Persi

unread,
Mar 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/26/99
to
In article <7de732$3t4$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>, jac...@my-dejanews.com says...

>
>Goddes...@webtv.net (Kat's Evil Twin) wrote:
>
>> dave marsh (Playboy)
>> Keith Richards said recently,
>
>Do you believe everything that Playboy and burned-out junkies tell you?
>
>I'm sorry, record companies and radio won't go away. You can disseminate and
>read text anywhere on the Internet, but book sales have only been growing in
>the past few years.

Not to mention that record sales were at an all time high last year, depsite
all the mp3 hoopla.

Tom Ewing

unread,
Mar 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/26/99
to
"Adam Glover" <kool...@interlog.com> wrote:

>Kat's Evil Twin <Goddes...@webtv.net> wrote:
>>Only a fool would pay for advertizing when all one as to do is
>>post to the a.m.a!

>Eureka! Record label execs everywhere have been eagerly debating
>for years about the best way to capture the attention of the
>elusive, highly coveted cash cow of a demographic that is the a.m.a
>readership. Who'da thunk that such a simple solution was sitting
>right under their noses the whole time!

Yes indeedy! And the adverts are the very first thing I download!

Cheers,
Tom.


Matthew Maxwell

unread,
Mar 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/26/99
to
In article <7deief$bsv$1...@oak.prod.itd.earthlink.net>,
cow...@NOSPAN.earthlink.net (Persi) wrote:

> Dammit, Matt! LANDRU was our last secret defense.

LANDRU is sorry. LANDRU will never again reveal its
presence.

> Now you'll ruin our plans to spread the gospel of Kat
> Marco to the nether regions of the planet.

Mmmmmm......nether regions........

--There is no LANDRU. Nope.

little lost one...

unread,
Mar 29, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/29/99
to
Matthew Maxwell wrote:

> mmax...@nospam.san.rr.com
> "Sea monkeys are NOT PRIMATES!" -- Max, of Sam and Max


what are Sea Monkeys?...i've never seen them...

Matthew Maxwell

unread,
Mar 29, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/29/99
to

They're not primates, that much has been established.

Didn't you ever read comic books as a kid and see
those ads for Sea Monkeys in the back? They're like
little pets. Only they're really brine shrimp,
not those cute little humanoids that you see in
the advertisements. Too bad, 'cause i liked the
mom Sea Monkey in blonde. She was a hottie.

-Matt

--

mmax...@nospam.san.rr.com
"Sea monkeys are NOT PRIMATES!" -- Max, of Sam and Max

remove 'nospam' to reply

0 new messages