Yes, I'm aware that Win2k is NT5! Perhaps I should have specified NT4 or
"other versions of NT" instead of just NT but that's what I get for posting
at 4 in the morning. But that wasn't the point of my message....I was
actually trying to figure out what string manipulating capabilities were
introduced with NT. I figured that most people would be intelligent enough
to figure out what my point was instead of nitpicking.
"Outsider" <nonvalid_em...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:3ABDC712.41687C02@yahoo.com...
> D'oh wrote:
> > It is my understanding that Windows 2000 (possibly NT?)...
> Windows 2000 *is* NT (version 5).
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.