http://community.livejournal.com/silent_films/286486.html
These things always drive me crazy. I should know who that is, but my
synapses aren't routing correctly or something.
Stacia
Is there any chance that a scan of the complete picture might be made
available? It looks like Clara Bow . . . but, maybe not. It is
definitely NOT Renee Adoree, nor is it Bessie Love, nor Claudette
Colbert. It does not look particularly like Bessie Love, either. Is
there a code number of any kind on the still?
> Is there any chance that a scan of the complete picture might be made
> available? It looks like Clara Bow . . . but, maybe not. It is
> definitely NOT Renee Adoree, nor is it Bessie Love, nor Claudette
> Colbert. It does not look particularly like Bessie Love, either. Is
> there a code number of any kind on the still?
Well, I thought it looked like Bessie Love (I'm "smashingstars" on
LJ, so the person you're referring to is me ;). The code on the still
is P723-78, although the P is written kind of funny and might be D.
The silent film codes list didn't help.
I'll ask about a scan, but I suspect the person who posted the photo
got it from another website. I'll try to get the original URL from
her.
Stacia
> Is there any chance that a scan of the complete picture might be made
> available?
Someone else just pointed out that you're probably seeing the little
tiny picture on the upper left, the one that says "It" on it, right?
That's not the picture with the mystery lady. I completely forgot
that LiveJournal's images can be really wonky for people who aren't
members. Sorry about that. Totally my fault, I should remember these
things by now.
I have a link to the picture here, it's in my Photobucket account.
It should be much easier for people to get to.
http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s120/praghead/mysterylady.jpg
Stacia
Yes, that's better. But it's still NOT Renee Adoree, nor is it Bessie
Love, nor Claudette Colbert, and it's not Clara Bow or Betty
Compson . . . but it is a Paramount publicity still ca. 1925-26. I'll
have to check the number codes and get back to you. Paramount is
tricky in this era, there are both west coast and east coast numbers.
>Yes, that's better. But it's still NOT Renee Adoree, nor is it Bessie
>Love, nor Claudette Colbert, and it's not Clara Bow or Betty
>Compson . . . but it is a Paramount publicity still ca. 1925-26. I'll
>have to check the number codes and get back to you. Paramount is
>tricky in this era, there are both west coast and east coast numbers.
Yeah, I never have any luck with Paramount still codes. If you do get a
chance to check into it, let us know. I'm positive you're a busy man,
though, and want to let you know I appreciate you taking the time out to
look at this picture!
Stacia
--
Visit my blog at http://www.shebloggedbynight.com
Well, the Paramount "P" series is a publicity or portrait series,
and the number in this case refers to a person rather than a film.
"517," for example, is Pola Negri's "P" number, all non-film-specific
Paramount Negri portraits will have "P-517-" as a prefix. I'll need
to do some checking to be sure, but I'm going to hazard a guess that
the actress in question is Jacqueline Logan.