Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Sequel of the day : "Ghostbusters 3"
2 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted
le...@my-deja.com
Sep 27, 2007, 11:19:18 AM9/27/07
to
On Sep 26, 10:49 pm, "Mr.Sequel" <mr_seq...@holly.wood> wrote:
> X-No-Archive: yes
>
> "Ghostbusters" was a major blockbuster in 1984, spawning
> of an animated series, video games and a lackluster sequel
> in 1989.
>
> The franchise is still worth a lot of $$$ and it's time to make
> "Ghostbusters III". Since the actors of the original movie are
> all grandpas by now, I'd suggest to let a dangerous evil monster
> eat them up in the movie and make room for "Ghostbusters,
> the next generation".
>
> They should also have more tits and ass in "Ghostbusters 3",
> since that's what people want to see these days.
>
> Story-wise, I'd say Cthulhu would make a nice villain and
> a good monster to eat the original Ghostbusters.
>
> Hollywood, make "Ghostbusters vs. Cthulhu", please!
> X-No-Archive: yes
>
> "Ghostbusters" was a major blockbuster in 1984, spawning
> of an animated series, video games and a lackluster sequel
> in 1989.
>
> The franchise is still worth a lot of $$$ and it's time to make
> "Ghostbusters III". Since the actors of the original movie are
> all grandpas by now, I'd suggest to let a dangerous evil monster
> eat them up in the movie and make room for "Ghostbusters,
> the next generation".
>
> They should also have more tits and ass in "Ghostbusters 3",
> since that's what people want to see these days.
>
> Story-wise, I'd say Cthulhu would make a nice villain and
> a good monster to eat the original Ghostbusters.
>
> Hollywood, make "Ghostbusters vs. Cthulhu", please!
Sorry if I was a little slow to catch the joke. All those sequels that
no one asked for? You're asking for them. Got it.
0 new messages