JD
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
> What are people referring to when the say these two words?
[Snart] [Hack]
Aheb...!
I dink but dey been by da derm "serious riber" is dat dey hab a goal, be it:
a) Bosing, derbye luging cool (Dot!)
b) Racig, dey feel nobody is baying addention do dem so de say dey are "serious
ribers", lige wed somebudy doden't beleeb you about someding, and you say "Do!
I'b serious!" Maybe racers who feel idadekwet feel bedder if dey use da terb
"serious riber"
c) Dey don't lige do hab fud...so dey are a "serious riber"
> I do believe that there are several
> interpretations involved here, all of which, I care not to
> know.
Oh shur! dow you dell be dat it wudz a rhedorical quesdjun...<snib>
> It's not how you play the game,
> it's whether you ride or not.
Aben doo dat brudder! [hack]
--
Rog,
Agodizingly drying to becub a bedder boundain biker,
ad baking shareholders ub Kleedex stogs ridch beyod dare wildest dreabs
Bay obbage do be ad da fawdowig...
Kleedex URL: http://www.kimberly-clark.com/what/family/
Here! here! JD!!!
I'm NOT a serious rider. I enjoy it too much to be serious.
Bubba
Our Father, Who Art On Singletrack, Hollowed Ti Thy Components...
Bill S., Always Nice to Start Day Spiritually in SUNNY San Diego :)
Roger Buchanan <rbuc...@wpcusrgrp.org> wrote
> I dink but dey been by da derm "serious riber" is dat dey hab a goal, be
it:
>
> a) Bosing, derbye luging cool (Dot!)
> b) Racig, dey feel nobody is baying addention do dem so de say dey are
"serious
> ribers", lige wed somebudy doden't beleeb you about someding, and you say
"Do!
> I'b serious!" Maybe racers who feel idadekwet feel bedder if dey use da
terb
> "serious riber"
> c) Dey don't lige do hab fud...so dey are a "serious riber" {sned}
> 4) Write on bike newsgroups.
This has absolutely nothing to do with being any kind of "rider."
--
Pete Fagerlin
Cycling pictures, videos, and unopinionated diatribes can
usually be found at: http://www.petefagerlin.com
Pete Fagerlin <pe...@petefagerlin.com> wrote in message
news:3OsE3.628$Rn.6...@typhoon-sf.snfc21.pbi.net...
Blaine
> I think it's the people who
> 1) Don't just ride every-once-in-a-while.
> 2) Ride more than 3 times per week off-road.
So someone who rides 150 miles/week onroad, and offroad only on saturday
morning is not a "serious rider"?
Pete
:Those that need to wear a helmet should look in
: their trousers and see whats missing.
Thanks for the tip!
I just checked my trousers and lo and behold, 4 of my piercings had fallen
out.
--
Pete "studly" Fagerlin
Or a serious rider is one man enough to ride without one. Last time I looked, I
had two testicles. That makes me a man. Men are not afraid of pain or injury or
even death. We thrive on it. Those that need to wear a helmet should look in
> ...death. We thrive on it.
Hmmm.
Chico, where's my helmet?
J'm
To reply direct, remove clothes.
...-.-
jim
>a serious rider is one man enough to ride without one. Last time I looked,
I
>had two testicles. That makes me a man. Men are not afraid of pain or
injury or
>even death. We thrive on it. Those that need to wear a helmet should look
in
>their trousers and see whats missing.
Oh what's the point . . . ride without a helmet, dumbass. I'll look for you
in the
obituaries . . . on second thought, why bother? I don't give a ratzass
whether
you live to pollute the gene pool or not.
Bubba
"Brontosaurus, tired of waging battles of wit with unarmed opponents"
>********** wrote:
>
>> ...death. We thrive on it.
>
>
>Hmmm.
>
>Chico, where's my helmet?
<picking myself off the floor again>
Uh, sorry. It's dented now. I hope you don't mind?
Chico
I think the definition should mean a person who considers mtn-biking
to be one of the higher priorities of his weekly schedule.
Another poster mentioned, "Someone who rides more than 3 times per
week." Well, if I ride more than 3 times per week, I will tire myself
out, and won't be able to ride for a week. That's not my goal. I
want to ride as often as I physically can. My weekly schedule
generally is defined with mtn-biking in mind. Big ride one day. Day
off. Small ride next day. Big ride next day. Day off. Big ride
Sunday morning, therefore don't get hammered Sat night. Night ride
Thursday night, therefore use thursday as a day to stay at work later
and catch up. etc etc. Even my meals are planned around biking. Big
ride on Sunday, so eat like a horse on Sat night. Night ride, eat
early.
Everything I do during my week usually has a biking consequence. I
consider myself a serious rider. I may not have the best bike, I may
not do well in races, I don't care how I look, and I don't try to look
'serious' on the trail. I want to enjoy my riding. I want to know
how to take care of my bike. I was to know how to manage my biking so
that I don't tire myself out.
I think I am a serious rider, but not according to most of the
definitions I've seen here so far.
Chico
On Fri, 17 Sep 1999 01:57:55 -0700, JD <dijcctN...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>What are people referring to when the say these two words?
>I have seen these words placed together on this NG many
>times and have wondered. What do they mean by "serious"?
>Is this a reference to racers? Is this someone who does
>not smile when riding? I do believe that there are several
>interpretations involved here, all of which, I care not to
>know. The only consistency I see in use of this term is
>when someone is (pathetically) attempting to convey
>superiority. Get a clue. It's not how you play the game,
>it's whether you ride or not.
>
>JD
>Uh, sorry. It's dented now. I hope you don't mind?
Ugh. I fell off of the chair *onto* the helmet! Now *that* hurt!
I'm still laughing, though! ;-)
I am most decidedly NOT a "serious" rider. My life is too full of
work, family, and a thousand other things to dedicate my life to
riding. OTOH, I love to ride, and do it every chance I get. Some
weeks that's 6 or 7 times, others only once or twice. Most weeks
I try and ride trails as much as possible, other weeks I'm on the
slicks flying along the asphalt and mild trails.
No point here . . . just putting my two cents in.
Bubba
Nat
JPoulos451 wrote:
> >According to one poster, a serious rider is one who is too dumb to wear a
> >helmet.
> >
>
> Or a serious rider is one man enough to ride without one. Last time I looked, I
On a more serious note, who gives a shit who's a serious rider and who's not.
Unless you're permanently manacled to someone, their riding philosophy and
abilities should mean little to you. If someone's a poser, they're not likely
to be riding the trails you are unless you're a poser too! And the the more
people who buy bikes and don't ride them on "serious" trails the LESS your bike
costs you and the more room you have on the trail. In closing I have two things
to say..."Can't we all just get along?" and "Shut up and ride your damned
bike!"
By the way, God told me to keep right on wearing a helmet again the other
day. At the minimum, His advice allowed me to continue my ride without a
mind clouded by pain.
But then again maybe you really do think
JPoulos451 wrote in message
<19990917135821...@ng-da1.aol.com>...
For some people it's not worth the price of the helmet.;)
Your brain: you opened your flies and your brain fell out!
Aren't you man enough to admit that you might not be completely
invulnerable? Or did you never get past the 'I'm 14, 10' tall and
bombproof' stage?
--
Thomas Letherby
The views expressed above are mine and not anyone else's. That includes my
employers Cyclesurgery (www.cyclesurgery.com) and my college, friends, family
etc.
Mike