The Enigma of Tom Sherman
Edward Dolan
Tom Sherman and I are both essentially responders. We know how to answer
others with either information or put downs, whatever the occasion calls
for. We are not originators of posts by and large.
I understood Ed Gin from his very first post to ARBR. He was clearly a
criminal scum bag of the worst sort and that is how I reacted to him.
JimmyMac was a poor lost soul who did not have a clue about how to treat
criminal human trash like Ed Gin. However, I do not hold him nearly as
culpable as I do Tom Sherman. Why? Because Tom Sherman is intelligent and
yet he stood by silently and let the criminal vandal troll destroy ARBR.
Tom Sherman was the mainstay of this newsgroup from the beginning as far as
I could tell. It was up to him to defend this newsgroup, but instead he took
a powder. The posts between Ed Gin and myself quickly resorted to nothing
but the most vile name calling. The only one who could have brought some
order to the insanity was Tom Sherman. I simply do not understand such
cowardice in the face of the enemy.
Courage is the greatest of all the virtues because it makes all the other
virtues possible. It was a total no brainer to know how to respond to the
criminal vandal troll Ed Gin and yet Tom Sherman did not care enough to
respond. That is why he is an enigma - at least to me.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
JimmyMac
Another Charisma malfunction??? For a brief span, Ed Dolan abandoned
his persona and we engaged in a hospitable exchange as I again
sincerely attempted to provide him with some computer assistance and
this is the crap I get in return ... fallacious regurgitated
nonsense??? I see that Dolan is once again back in form. Ed, thanks
for revealing yourself for what and who you are ... a scoundrel. Yep,
the myth monger is at it again ... dishing up another helping of
unsubstantiated opinion without so much as a shred of corroborating
evidence. Those who offer the most resistance when their wisdom or
authority are challenged are often the very same persons who have an
inherent inability to establish valid grounds to discredit others.
That is a virtual portrait of Dolan, but if you read between the
lines, you will note that his main complaint is that no one and
especially Tom and I have bothered to post anything and that kind of
sucks the very meaning of life out of Dolan. In retrospect, perhaps I
should have remained mute as no response would have likely been more
effective. - Jim McNamara
Mike Vandeman
<jimmy...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Sep 24, 12:00�am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> Tom Sherman and I are both essentially responders. We know how to answer
>> others with either information or put downs, whatever the occasion calls
>> for. We are not originators of posts by and large.
>>
>> I understood Ed Gin from his very first post to ARBR. He was clearly a
>> criminal scum bag of the worst sort and that is how I reacted to him.
>> JimmyMac was a poor lost soul who did not have a clue about how to treat
>> criminal human trash like Ed Gin. However, I do not hold him nearly as
>> culpable as I do Tom Sherman. Why? Because Tom Sherman is intelligent and
>> yet he stood by silently and let the criminal vandal troll destroy ARBR.
>>
>> Tom Sherman was the mainstay of this newsgroup from the beginning as far as
>> I could tell. It was up to him to defend this newsgroup, but instead he took
>> a powder. The posts between Ed Gin and myself quickly resorted to nothing
>> but the most vile name calling. The only one who could have brought some
>> order to the insanity was Tom Sherman. I simply do not understand such
>> cowardice in the face of the enemy.
>>
>> Courage is the greatest of all the virtues because it makes all the other
>> virtues possible. It was a total �no brainer to know how to respond to the
>> criminal vandal troll Ed Gin and yet Tom Sherman did not care enough to
>> respond. That is why he is an enigma - at least to me.
Tom Sherman is in a race to the bottom. Alone. Higher life forms will
never understand him. He doesn't even understand himself!
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!
Edward Dolan
"JimmyMac" <jimmy...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:68d44e44-a51d-44f1...@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 24, 12:00 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> Tom Sherman and I are both essentially responders. We know how to answer
> others with either information or put downs, whatever the occasion calls
> for. We are not originators of posts by and large.
>
> I understood Ed Gin from his very first post to ARBR. He was clearly a
> criminal scum bag of the worst sort and that is how I reacted to him.
> JimmyMac was a poor lost soul who did not have a clue about how to treat
> criminal human trash like Ed Gin. However, I do not hold him nearly as
> culpable as I do Tom Sherman. Why? Because Tom Sherman is intelligent and
> yet he stood by silently and let the criminal vandal troll destroy ARBR.
>
> Tom Sherman was the mainstay of this newsgroup from the beginning as far
> as
> I could tell. It was up to him to defend this newsgroup, but instead he
> took
> a powder. The posts between Ed Gin and myself quickly resorted to nothing
> but the most vile name calling. The only one who could have brought some
> order to the insanity was Tom Sherman. I simply do not understand such
> cowardice in the face of the enemy.
>
> Courage is the greatest of all the virtues because it makes all the other
> virtues possible. It was a total no brainer to know how to respond to the
> criminal vandal troll Ed Gin and yet Tom Sherman did not care enough to
> respond. That is why he is an enigma - at least to me.
>> Another Charisma malfunction??? For a brief span, Ed Dolan abandoned
his persona and we engaged in a hospitable exchange as I again
sincerely attempted to provide him with some computer assistance and
this is the crap I get in return ... fallacious regurgitated
nonsense??? I see that Dolan is once again back in form. Ed, thanks
for revealing yourself for what and who you are ... a scoundrel. Yep,
the myth monger is at it again ... dishing up another helping of
unsubstantiated opinion without so much as a shred of corroborating
evidence. Those who offer the most resistance when their wisdom or
authority are challenged are often the very same persons who have an
inherent inability to establish valid grounds to discredit others.
That is a virtual portrait of Dolan, but if you read between the
lines, you will note that his main complaint is that no one and
especially Tom and I have bothered to post anything and that kind of
sucks the very meaning of life out of Dolan. In retrospect, perhaps I
should have remained mute as no response would have likely been more
effective. - Jim McNamara
All anyone has to do is go back into the Google archives of ARBR from a few
years ago and see for oneself what took place. However, this is not for the
weak of stomach. All you will see there is human behavior at its worst.
Frankly, I do not recommend it, but if you want to know what you are talking
about, then that is what you will have to do.
Edward Dolan
"Mike Vandeman" <mjv...@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:j8qkd4p8deo9vb4io...@4ax.com...
The question is ever present on our minds here at ARBR - who killed Cock
Robin? Some will say I did it by my contentious posts. I say it was Ed Gin,
aided and abetted by JimmyMac and Tom Sherman. Mr. Sherman has a genius for
absenting himself when the going gets rough. Silence in the face of the
enemy can kill a newsgroup just as easily as the most rambunctious posts.
The truth of the matter is that ARBR was once a cozy little club for the
cognoscenti. It was enough to make any normal person puke. I took them all
on and gave the place a good cleansing. If all they wanted to do is chat
with one another about the weather, then let them get their own Chat Room.
Usenet is not for that!
Edward Dolan
"Tom Sherman" <sunset...@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:gbegrh$hjc$1...@registered.motzarella.org...
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> Tom Sherman and I are both essentially responders. We know how to answer
>> others with either information or put downs, whatever the occasion calls
>> for. We are not originators of posts by and large.
>>
>> I understood Ed Gin from his very first post to ARBR. He was clearly a
>> criminal scum bag of the worst sort and that is how I reacted to him.
>> JimmyMac was a poor lost soul who did not have a clue about how to treat
>> criminal human trash like Ed Gin. However, I do not hold him nearly as
>> culpable as I do Tom Sherman. Why? Because Tom Sherman is intelligent and
>> yet he stood by silently and let the criminal vandal troll destroy ARBR.
>>
>
> Gin is NOT Johnny NoCom.
I don't believe it and I never will! JimmyMac is the expert on Ed Gin, not
you.
>> Tom Sherman was the mainstay of this newsgroup from the beginning as far
>> as I could tell. It was up to him to defend this newsgroup, but instead
>> he took a powder. The posts between Ed Gin and myself quickly resorted to
>> nothing but the most vile name calling. The only one who could have
>> brought some order to the insanity was Tom Sherman. I simply do not
>> understand such cowardice in the face of the enemy.
>>
> Actually, alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent was around for several years before I
> posted anything.
So what is a few years in the long and dishonorable history of ARBR?
>> Courage is the greatest of all the virtues because it makes all the other
>> virtues possible. It was a total no brainer to know how to respond to
>> the criminal vandal troll Ed Gin and yet Tom Sherman did not care enough
>> to respond. That is why he is an enigma - at least to me.
>>
> <Yawn>
Yawn away old slumberer. When the chips were down, you were found wanting
and you and I both know that. Hells Bells, even JimmyMac knows that. When
you are a mainstay of a newsgroup, you are NOT free to take powders when the
going gets rough.
Regards,
JimmyMac
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
What a dunderhead. I mean why encourage readers to do that as they
will only discover and conclude that you are what you are ... fulll of
shi ... not exactly a revelation however.
JimmyMac
> "Tom Sherman" <sunsetss0...@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:gbegrh$hjc$1...@registered.motzarella.org...
>
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> >> Tom Sherman and I are both essentially responders. We know how to answer
> >> others with either information or put downs, whatever the occasion calls
> >> for. We are not originators of posts by and large.
>
> >> I understood Ed Gin from his very first post to ARBR. He was clearly a
> >> criminal scum bag of the worst sort and that is how I reacted to him.
> >> JimmyMac was a poor lost soul who did not have a clue about how to treat
> >> criminal human trash like Ed Gin. However, I do not hold him nearly as
> >> culpable as I do Tom Sherman. Why? Because Tom Sherman is intelligent and
> >> yet he stood by silently and let the criminal vandal troll destroy ARBR.
>
> > For the 494,984,187,198,498,978,971,749,654,498,198,065,408,796th time, Ed
> > Gin is NOT Johnny NoCom.
>
> I don't believe it and I never will! JimmyMac is the expert on Ed Gin, not
> you.
The same JimmyMac thatyou have fallaciously accused of aiding and
abbeting Ed Gin? The conundrum continues. If you mean what you say
thaen here this. Toe Sherman is right. Ed Gin was not Johnny Nocom.
Several contributors (maybe enve Ed Gin himself) comprised that
persona, the primary one of whom no longer resides in the Chicago
area, but was an instrumental Monkey Ilalnder and Highracers Suck blog
asshole and that is all the clues that you will ever get from me but I
know who he is as well. Most posts were through a single conduit and
if he is reading this, he knows that I know who he is, but as much as
I am opposed to his role, I will not reveal who he is, but he is not
Ed Gin and not matter how many times you repeat your unsubstantiated
nonsense, it is no more tru or valid than it was with its first
utterance.
> >> Tom Sherman was the mainstay of this newsgroup from the beginning as far
> >> as I could tell. It was up to him to defend this newsgroup, but instead
> >> he took a powder. The posts between Ed Gin and myself quickly resorted to
> >> nothing but the most vile name calling. The only one who could have
> >> brought some order to the insanity was Tom Sherman. I simply do not
> >> understand such cowardice in the face of the enemy.
>
> > Actually, alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent was around for several years before I
> > posted anything.
>
> So what is a few years in the long and dishonorable history of ARBR?
>
> >> Courage is the greatest of all the virtues because it makes all the other
> >> virtues possible. It was a total no brainer to know how to respond to
> >> the criminal vandal troll Ed Gin and yet Tom Sherman did not care enough
> >> to respond. That is why he is an enigma - at least to me.
>
> > <Yawn>
>
> Yawn away old slumberer. When the chips were down, you were found wanting
> and you and I both know that. Hells Bells, even JimmyMac knows that. When
> you are a mainstay of a newsgroup, you are NOT free to take powders when the
> going gets rough.
This is a public service announcement. Ed Dolan has neither been
employed for the purpose nor does he speak on my behalf. What
JimmyMac knows is that Ed Dolan is an equal opportunity offender whose
sole purpose is to aggravate not to enlighten. The bottom line is
that Ed Dolan is full of shit. Everyone knows he's full of shit Ed
Dolan is aware that everyone knows he's full of shit. As
imperceptive as he is, even Ed Dolan knows he's full of shit.
Edward Dolan
All that anyone will ever conclude is that JimmyMac was in over his head,
that Ed Gin was a criminal vandal troll and that Tom Sherman was a
consummate coward. Of course they will also conclude that Ed Dolan the Great
was a paragon of virtue and a model for all mankind.
Edward Dolan
> I don't believe it and I never will! JimmyMac is the expert on Ed Gin, not
> you.
>> The same JimmyMac that you have fallaciously accused of aiding and
abbeting Ed Gin? The conundrum continues. If you mean what you say
thaen here this. Tom Sherman is right. Ed Gin was not Johnny Nocom.
Several contributors (maybe enve Ed Gin himself) comprised that
persona, the primary one of whom no longer resides in the Chicago
area, but was an instrumental Monkey Ilalnder and Highracers Suck blog
asshole and that is all the clues that you will ever get from me but I
know who he is as well. Most posts were through a single conduit and
if he is reading this, he knows that I know who he is, but as much as
I am opposed to his role, I will not reveal who he is, but he is not
Ed Gin and not matter how many times you repeat your unsubstantiated
nonsense, it is no more tru or valid than it was with its first
utterance.
Well, if Ed Gin was not the criminal vandal troll who destroyed ARBR, then I
would like to know who it was. I was led to believe by you and several
others at the time that it was in fact Ed Gin.
[...]
> Yawn away old slumberer. When the chips were down, you were found wanting
> and you and I both know that. Hells Bells, even JimmyMac knows that. When
> you are a mainstay of a newsgroup, you are NOT free to take powders when
> the
> going gets rough.
>> This is a public service announcement. Ed Dolan has neither been
employed for the purpose nor does he speak on my behalf. What
JimmyMac knows is that Ed Dolan is an equal opportunity offender whose
sole purpose is to aggravate not to enlighten. The bottom line is
that Ed Dolan is full of shit. Everyone knows he's full of shit Ed
Dolan is aware that everyone knows he's full of shit. As
imperceptive as he is, even Ed Dolan knows he's full of shit.
The only one on this newsgroup that is full of shit is JimmyMac. He proves
it by his stalking behavior. I have too much pride to ever stalk anyone like
he does, but I guess when you are born of low parentage like him that pride
does not enter into it. Chicago is full of trash people. It is a toilet for
the entire Midwest. Hence all the references to shit by JimmyMac.
JimmyMac
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:29f78e29-ae4e-4433...@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> On Sep 24, 7:16 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> [...]
>
> > I don't believe it and I never will! JimmyMac is the expert on Ed Gin, not
> > you.
> >> The same JimmyMac that you have fallaciously accused of aiding and
>
> abbeting Ed Gin? The conundrum continues. If you mean what you say
> thaen here this. Tom Sherman is right. Ed Gin was not Johnny Nocom.
> Several contributors (maybe enve Ed Gin himself) comprised that
> persona, the primary one of whom no longer resides in the Chicago
> asshole and that is all the clues that you will ever get from me but I
> know who he is as well. Most posts were through a single conduit and
> if he is reading this, he knows that I know who he is, but as much as
> I am opposed to his role, I will not reveal who he is, but he is not
> Ed Gin and not matter how many times you repeat your unsubstantiated
> nonsense, it is no more tru or valid than it was with its first
> utterance.
>
> Well, if Ed Gin was not the criminal vandal troll who destroyed ARBR, then I
> would like to know who it was. I was led to believe by you and several
> others at the time that it was in fact Ed Gin.
> [...]
If ARBR were destroyed you would not be posting a question to which I
already basically said I would not answer. At the time I believed it
was Ed Gin too and he may have been involved, but was hot the primary
party nor the main poster. either from wha I now understand.
Regardless this is ancient history, so just drop it. already.
> > Yawn away old slumberer. When the chips were down, you were found wanting
> > and you and I both know that. Hells Bells, even JimmyMac knows that. When
> > you are a mainstay of a newsgroup, you are NOT free to take powders when
> > the
> > going gets rough.
> >> This is a public service announcement. Ed Dolan has neither been
>
> employed for the purpose nor does he speak on my behalf. What
> JimmyMac knows is that Ed Dolan is an equal opportunity offender whose
> sole purpose is to aggravate not to enlighten. The bottom line is
> that Ed Dolan is full of shit. Everyone knows he's full of shit Ed
> Dolan is aware that everyone knows he's full of shit. As
> imperceptive as he is, even Ed Dolan knows he's full of shit.
>
> The only one on this newsgroup that is full of shit is JimmyMac. He proves
> it by his stalking behavior. I have too much pride to ever stalk anyone like
> he does,
You do .... Tom Sherman. So much for your pride.
> but I guess when you are born of low parentage like him that pride
> does not enter into it. Chicago is full of trash people. It is a toilet for
> the entire Midwest. Hence all the references to shit by JimmyMac.
Characteristically. Dolan continues to babble on about that which he
knows noting of.
JimmyMac
They would conclude, as Dolan has often indicated, I am the expert on
Ed Gin and siad expert has repeatedly implied Doaln is not and
consequently should refrain from future proclamations about the man.
Mike Vandeman
wrote:
Pearls before swine.... Your talents are being wasted on these
dunderheads.
>Regards,
>
>Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
>aka
>Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
Edward Dolan
> but I guess when you are born of low parentage like him [JimmyMac] that
> does not enter into it. Chicago is full of trash people. It is a toilet
> for
> the entire Midwest. Hence all the references to shit by JimmyMac.
>> Characteristically[,] . Dolan continues to babble on about that [of]
>> which he
knows nothing[.] of.
I was once stupid enough to go THROUGH Chicago instead of AROUND it like
most sensible folks. The place is a mess, but that is what you get when you
allow in all the trash people of the world.
I don't know which is worse, Chicago or Detroit? Even Tom Sherman had sense
enough to move to Milwaukee. Milwaukee is slightly better than Chicago, but
none of the dumps so far mentioned can compare with our lovely Twin Cities
of Minnesota.
Tom Sherman
>> All that anyone will ever conclude is that JimmyMac was in over his head,
>> that Ed Gin was a criminal vandal troll and that Tom Sherman was a
>> consummate coward. Of course they will also conclude that Ed Dolan the Great
>> was a paragon of virtue and a model for all mankind.
>
> They would conclude, as Dolan has often indicated, I am the expert on
> Ed Gin and siad expert has repeatedly implied Doaln is not and
> consequently should refrain from future proclamations about the man.
>
that would not be available to others.
--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
“the bacteria people tuned in-as to bioengineering at the correct wave
Point” - gene daniels
JimmyMac
You two slobbering over one another like two teenager in heat is
sickening and telling. Haven't you got something better to do like a
build wild life habitat for you an Ed?
Tom Sherman
>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 23:47:15 -0500, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net>
>> wrote:
>>> All that anyone will ever conclude is that JimmyMac was in over his head,
>>> that Ed Gin was a criminal vandal troll and that Tom Sherman was a
>>> consummate coward. Of course they will also conclude that Ed Dolan the Great
>>> was a paragon of virtue and a model for all mankind.
>> Pearls before swine.... Your talents are being wasted on these
>> dunderheads.
>
> You two slobbering over one another like two teenager in heat is
> sickening and telling. Haven't you got something better to do like a
> build wild life habitat for you an Ed?
>
cut down some trees to build a fort.
Edward Dolan
On Sep 25, 12:57 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 23:47:15 -0500, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net>
> wrote:
> >All that anyone will ever conclude is that JimmyMac was in over his head,
> >that Ed Gin was a criminal vandal troll and that Tom Sherman was a
> >consummate coward. Of course they will also conclude that Ed Dolan the
> >Great
> >was a paragon of virtue and a model for all mankind.
>
> Pearls before swine.... Your talents are being wasted on these
> dunderheads.
>>> You two slobbering over one another like two teenager in heat is
sickening and telling. Haven't you got something better to do like a
build wild life habitat for you an Ed?
Imagine what it must be like to be an inferior like JimmyMac, a poor wretch
who is eaten up with jealousy of his superiors. I forgive him his trespasses
since that is what we superior types must do in the interest of preserving
the species. However, I would still like to drop a hydrogen bomb on Tom
Sherman's head.
JimmyMac
wrote:
> JimmyMac aka Jim McNamara wrote:> On Sep 25, 12:57 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 23:47:15 -0500, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net>
> >> wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>> All that anyone will ever conclude is that JimmyMac was in over his head,
> >>> that Ed Gin was a criminal vandal troll and that Tom Sherman was a
> >>> consummate coward. Of course they will also conclude that Ed Dolan the Great
> >>> was a paragon of virtue and a model for all mankind.
> >> Pearls before swine.... Your talents are being wasted on these
> >> dunderheads.
>
> > You two slobbering over one another like two teenager in heat is
> > sickening and telling. Haven't you got something better to do like a
>
> Mike and Ed could ride mountain bikes into the forest together, and then
> cut down some trees to build a fort.
AND, do what behind closed doors ;^)
JimmyMac
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:78102298-3b73-4e14...@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Sep 25, 12:57 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 23:47:15 -0500, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net>
> > wrote:
> [...]
> > >All that anyone will ever conclude is that JimmyMac was in over his head,
> > >that Ed Gin was a criminal vandal troll and that Tom Sherman was a
> > >consummate coward. Of course they will also conclude that Ed Dolan the
> > >Great
> > >was a paragon of virtue and a model for all mankind.
>
> > Pearls before swine.... Your talents are being wasted on these
> > dunderheads.
> >>> You two slobbering over one another like two teenager in heat is
>
> sickening and telling. Haven't you got something better to do like a
> build wild life habitat for you an Ed?
>
> Imagine what it must be like to be an inferior like JimmyMac, a poor wretch
> who is eaten up with jealousy of his superiors. I forgive him his trespasses
> since that is what we superior types must do in the interest of preserving
> the species.
To preserve the species would require you to be ...1.to be ineterested
in the species and 2. to be interested in the opposite sex.
Those who offer the most resistance when their wisdom, authority or
intentions are called int question are often the very same persons who
have an inherent inability to establish valid grounds to discredit
others. Jealous? Inferior? Go ahead. Flatter yourself as no one
else will except Mike V., of course. If I felt jealous of or inferior
to HEAD Dolan the GRATE, I think it would be time to seek professional
help or just end it all.
Mike Vandeman
Thanks for proving my point! LOL
Mike Vandeman
wrote:
>
>"JimmyMac" <jimmy...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:78102298-3b73-4e14...@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>On Sep 25, 12:57 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 23:47:15 -0500, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net>
>> wrote:
>[...]
>> >All that anyone will ever conclude is that JimmyMac was in over his head,
>> >that Ed Gin was a criminal vandal troll and that Tom Sherman was a
>> >consummate coward. Of course they will also conclude that Ed Dolan the
>> >Great
>> >was a paragon of virtue and a model for all mankind.
>>
>> Pearls before swine.... Your talents are being wasted on these
>> dunderheads.
>
>>>> You two slobbering over one another like two teenager in heat is
>sickening and telling. Haven't you got something better to do like a
>build wild life habitat for you an Ed?
>
>Imagine what it must be like to be an inferior like JimmyMac, a poor wretch
>who is eaten up with jealousy of his superiors. I forgive him his trespasses
>since that is what we superior types must do in the interest of preserving
>the species. However, I would still like to drop a hydrogen bomb on Tom
>Sherman's head.
I rather think that guys like that are their own worst enemies, and
that evolution will take care of them in good course. VERY good
course!
>> >Regards,
>>
>> >Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
>> >aka
>> >Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
Mike Vandeman
That's the first good idea you've had! Don't let US get in your
way.... Thanks for proving my point.
>> However, I would still like to drop a hydrogen bomb on Tom
>> Sherman's head.
>>
>> > >Regards,
>>
>> > >Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
>> > >aka
>> > >Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
Edward Dolan
On Sep 25, 8:27 pm, Tom Sherman <sunsetss0...@REMOVETHISyahoo.com>
wrote:
> JimmyMac aka Jim McNamara wrote:> On Sep 25, 12:57 pm, Mike Vandeman
> <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 23:47:15 -0500, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net>
> >> wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>> All that anyone will ever conclude is that JimmyMac was in over his
> >>> head,
> >>> that Ed Gin was a criminal vandal troll and that Tom Sherman was a
> >>> consummate coward. Of course they will also conclude that Ed Dolan the
> >>> Great
> >>> was a paragon of virtue and a model for all mankind.
> >> Pearls before swine.... Your talents are being wasted on these
> >> dunderheads.
>
> > You two slobbering over one another like two teenager in heat is
> > sickening and telling. Haven't you got something better to do like a
> > build a wild life habitat for you and Ed?
>
> Mike and Ed could ride mountain bikes into the forest together, and then
> cut down some trees to build a fort.
>>>>> AND, do what behind closed doors ;^)
We sip our Livingston Cellars Red Rose and discuss who is the bigger jerk,
Jim McNamara or Tom Sherman? One is a pitiful stalker and the other is a
consummate coward. Hard to choose between the two.
Edward Dolan
> Imagine what it must be like to be an inferior like JimmyMac, a poor
> wretch
> who is eaten up with jealousy of his superiors. I forgive him his
> trespasses
> since that is what we superior types must do in the interest of preserving
> the species.
>> To preserve the species would require you to be ...1.to be ineterested
in the species and 2. to be interested in the opposite sex.
You are the sex besotted creature of the lower instincts. Did you not marry
and impose your loathsome self on a poor long suffering wife? How many
disgusting offspring did the two of you spew upon the world. Yea, that is
the question! At least Tom Sherman and I had the good sense to remain
single.
>> Those who offer the most resistance when their wisdom, authority or
intentions are called int question are often the very same persons who
have an inherent inability to establish valid grounds to discredit
others. Jealous? Inferior? Go ahead. Flatter yourself as no one
else will except Mike V., of course. If I felt jealous of or inferior
to HEAD Dolan the GRATE, I think it would be time to seek professional
help or just end it all.
All stalkers do what they do because they are envious of a superior being. I
guess I must appear as a God to you!
Edward Dolan
>>You two slobbering over one another like two teenager in heat is
>>sickening and telling. Haven't you got something better to do like a
>>build wild life habitat for you an Ed?
>
> Thanks for proving my point! LOL
JimmyMac is typical of the type. When push comes to shove he resorts to
sexual innuendo. This is always the hallmark of a bankrupt mind. I knew
hundreds of guys like him when I was in the Navy. They come from working
class backgrounds where references to piss, shit and fuck is what they grew
up with. They have all the culture of an illiterate slob.
They fancy themselves intelligent because they know all the dirty little
words that their fathers taught them. In JimmyMac's case, I definitely see
some input from his mother too. He is more to be pitied than anything else.
What he yearns for above all else in life is to be a superior being like Ed
Dolan the Great, but alas, such a state of grace will ever elude him. He was
doomed from the moment of his lowly birth. You have to be to the manor born.
JimmyMac
What point would that be? If you part your hare on the other side of
your head maybe you can cover it up.
JimmyMac
What point would that be? If you part your hare on the other side of
your head maybe you can cover it up.
> >> >Regards,
JimmyMac
> On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 20:36:30 -0500, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >news:78102298-3b73-4e14...@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> >On Sep 25, 12:57 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 23:47:15 -0500, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net>
> >> wrote:
> >[...]
> >> >All that anyone will ever conclude is that JimmyMac was in over his head,
> >> >that Ed Gin was a criminal vandal troll and that Tom Sherman was a
> >> >consummate coward. Of course they will also conclude that Ed Dolan the
> >> >Great
> >> >was a paragon of virtue and a model for all mankind.
>
> >> Pearls before swine.... Your talents are being wasted on these
> >> dunderheads.
>
> >>>> You two slobbering over one another like two teenager in heat is
> >sickening and telling. Haven't you got something better to do like a
> >build wild life habitat for you an Ed?
>
> >Imagine what it must be like to be an inferior like JimmyMac, a poor wretch
> >who is eaten up with jealousy of his superiors. I forgive him his trespasses
> >since that is what we superior types must do in the interest of preserving
> >the species. However, I would still like to drop a hydrogen bomb on Tom
> >Sherman's head.
>
> I rather think that guys like that are their own worst enemies, and
> that evolution will take care of them in good course. VERY good
> course!
Somehow natural selection failed to get the joe done where the dynamic
duo Eddy and Mikey are concerned.
JimmyMac
What point would that be? If you part you hare on the other side of
you head, you just might cover it up.
JimmyMac
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
What a picture ... two star crossed admirers ... a candle light
dinner ... sipping Livingston Cellars swill ... embracing a
hypothetical notion and who knows what else.
JimmyMac
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:dbdebf2c-94c5-4d71...@r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> On Sep 25, 8:36 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> [...]
>
> > Imagine what it must be like to be an inferior like JimmyMac, a poor
> > wretch
> > who is eaten up with jealousy of his superiors. I forgive him his
> > trespasses
> > since that is what we superior types must do in the interest of preserving
> > the species.
> >> To preserve the species would require you to be ...1.to be ineterested
>
> in the species and 2. to be interested in the opposite sex.
>
> You are the sex besotted creature of the lower instincts. Did you not marry
> and impose your loathsome self on a poor long suffering wife? How many
> disgusting offspring did the two of you spew upon the world. Yea, that is
> the question! At least Tom Sherman and I had the good sense to remain
> single.
I think I struck a nerve. Not that it is any of you business ...
but, no children and by mutual choice.
> >> Those who offer the most resistance when their wisdom, authority or
>
> intentions are called into question are often the very same persons who
> have an inherent inability to establish valid grounds to discredit
> others. Jealous? Inferior? Go ahead. Flatter yourself as no one
> else will except Mike V., of course. If I felt jealous of or inferior
> to HEAD Dolan the GRATE, I think it would be time to seek professional
> help or just end it all.
>
> All stalkers do what they do because they are envious of a superior being. I
> guess I must appear as a God to you!
And by your own reasoning,, Tom Sherman thne must be your supreme
being.
JimmyMac
> "Mike Vandeman" <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote in message
>
> news:5fbqd4dme78rshn34...@4ax.com...
>
> > On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 18:21:33 -0700 (PDT), JimmyMac
> > <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> [...]
> >>You two slobbering over one another like two teenager in heat is
> >>sickening and telling. Haven't you got something better to do like a
> >>build wild life habitat for you an Ed?
>
> > Thanks for proving my point! LOL
>
> JimmyMac is typical of the type. When push comes to shove he resorts to
> sexual innuendo. This is always the hallmark of a bankrupt mind. I knew
> hundreds of guys like him when I was in the Navy. They come from working
> class backgrounds where references to piss, shit and fuck is what they grew
> up with. They have all the culture of an illiterate slob.
>
> They fancy themselves intelligent because they know all the dirty little
> words that their fathers taught them. In JimmyMac's case, I definitely see
> some input from his mother too. He is more to be pitied than anything else.
>
> What he yearns for above all else in life is to be a superior being like Ed
> Dolan the Great, but alas, such a state of grace will ever elude him. He was
> doomed from the moment of his lowly birth. You have to be to the manor born.
Dolan's father took a shit in the woods and exclaimed ... arise and
walk and Ed came into being.
Edward Dolan
> We sip our Livingston Cellars Red Rose and discuss who is the bigger jerk,
> Jim McNamara or Tom Sherman? One is a pitiful stalker and the other is a
> consummate coward. Hard to choose between the two.
>> What a picture ... two star crossed admirers ... a candle light
dinner ... sipping Livingston Cellars swill ... embracing a
hypothetical notion and who knows what else.
In the meantime Jim McNamara continues to fuck his poor old longsuffering
wife even at his advanced age. Why? There is no longer any possibility of
any issue. He should take his two poor old longsuffering hound dogs for a
walk instead.
Edward Dolan
> All stalkers do what they do because they are envious of a superior being.
> I
> guess I must appear as a God to you!
>> And by your own reasoning,, Tom Sherman thne must be your supreme
being.
Tom Sherman is here so my foot will always have a good ass to kick. Make
sure you do not fall into that category yourself!
Edward Dolan
You need to stop fucking your wife since you are not into producing babies.
Your poor old longsuffering wife is fed up with. She is going to divorce you
once she finds out that all you have on your mind is piss, shit and fuck. By
the way, I wonder whatever happened to Wayne Leggett, the poet of piss, shit
and fuck?
Jeez, take your two poor old longsuffering dogs for a walk why don't you?
Better yet, go see Ed Gin and find out if he still hates your guts. That
ought to give you something to do.
JimmyMac
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:2b83953d-c93c-49b2...@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> On Sep 26, 3:06 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> [...]
>
> > We sip our Livingston Cellars Red Rose and discuss who is the bigger jerk,
> > Jim McNamara or Tom Sherman? One is a pitiful stalker and the other is a
> > consummate coward. Hard to choose between the two.
> >> What a picture ... two star crossed admirers ... a candle light
>
> dinner ... sipping Livingston Cellars swill ... embracing a
> hypothetical notion and who knows what else.
>
> In the meantime Jim McNamara continues to fuck his poor old longsuffering
> wife even at his advanced age. Why? There is no longer any possibility of
> any issue. He should take his two poor old longsuffering hound dogs for a
> walk instead.
What does a Christmas tree and a Dolan have in common? Their balls
are just for decoration.
Edward Dolan
On Sep 26, 10:25 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:2b83953d-c93c-49b2...@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> On Sep 26, 3:06 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> [...]
>
> > We sip our Livingston Cellars Red Rose and discuss who is the bigger
> > jerk,
> > Jim McNamara or Tom Sherman? One is a pitiful stalker and the other is a
> > consummate coward. Hard to choose between the two.
> >> What a picture ... two star crossed admirers ... a candle light
>
> dinner ... sipping Livingston Cellars swill ... embracing a
> hypothetical notion and who knows what else.
>
> In the meantime Jim McNamara continues to fuck his poor old longsuffering
> wife even at his advanced age. Why? There is no longer any possibility of
> any issue. He should take his two poor old longsuffering hound dogs for a
> walk instead.
>>>> What does a Christmas tree and a Dolan have in common? Their balls
are just for decoration.
What does a fucker and a fuckee have in common? They are both fucked!
Now go take your poor old longsuffering hound dogs for a walk and quit
bothering these newsgroups with your asininities. If you don't behave
yourself, I am going to have Tom Sherman sic Ed Gin on you!
JimmyMac
Gie me time to work up a tremble. I sincerely doubt that Tom Sherman
would ever do your bidding. I just knew you could refrain from
mentioning Ed Gin. The man though long gone still has you firmly in
his grasp and exerts an amazing degree of control over you. You
really need to let go. Have you discussed this oppressive fixation of
yours with your therapist? It just must really suck to be you.
JimmyMac
> would ever do your bidding. I just knew that you could not refrain from
> mentioning Ed Gin. The man though long gone still has you firmly in
> his grasp and exerts an amazing degree of control over you. You
> really need to let go. Have you discussed this oppressive fixation of
> yours with your therapist? It just must really suck to be you.
Typos corrected ... JIm
Edward Dolan
[...]
> Give me time to work up a tremble. I sincerely doubt that Tom Sherman
> would ever do your bidding. I just knew that you could not refrain from
> mentioning Ed Gin. The man though long gone still has you firmly in
> his grasp and exerts an amazing degree of control over you. You
> really need to let go. Have you discussed this oppressive fixation of
> yours with your therapist?
All Jim McNamara ever had to do was to tell Ed Gin to go fuck himself, but
instead he took the bastard seriously and remonstrated with him. That is
what comes of playing the role of a fool. Unfortunately, what they were
doing to one another took down the newsgroup ARBR.
> It just must really suck to be you.
It would certainly suck to be me if I took any of this the least bit serious
like you do. But I don't. I am laughing constantly as I post my messages to
all the nuts and screwballs like you who infest unmoderated Usenet
newsgroups.
Positively nothing can ever be accomplished on an unmoderated newsgroup.
Maybe in the the early days it made some sense, but it doesn't anymore. I
would like to see Usenet down away with. It is a remnant from the early days
of the Internet and has now become only a vehicle for fools like you and me.
Note how even Tom Sherman has given up on it. Anyone with any brains has
long since left Usenet.
[...]
JimmyMac
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:a1e72fc5-5601-4c0a...@y71g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
> [...]
>
> > Give me time to work up a tremble. I sincerely doubt that Tom Sherman
> > would ever do your bidding. I just knew that you could not refrain from
> > mentioning Ed Gin. The man though long gone still has you firmly in
> > his grasp and exerts an amazing degree of control over you. You
> > really need to let go. Have you discussed this oppressive fixation of
> > yours with your therapist?
>
> All Jim McNamara ever had to do was to tell Ed Gin to go fuck himself, but
> instead he took the bastard seriously and remonstrated with him. That is
> what comes of playing the role of a fool. Unfortunately, what they were
> doing to one another took down the newsgroup ARBR.
You mean the newsgroup that you continue to post to ... that
newsgroup? Again you have proved that you are not a man of your
word. You just can't l refrain from mentioning Ed Gin, particularly
in this context. Ed Gin, though long gone continues to have you
firmly in his grasp. IN his absence he still exerts an amazing degree
of control over you. You really need to let go. Have you discussed
this oppressive fixation of yours with your therapist?
> > It just must really suck to be you.
>
> It would certainly suck to be me if I took any of this the least bit serious
> like you do. But I don't. I am laughing constantly as I post my messages to
> all the nuts and screwballs like you who infest unmoderated Usenet
> newsgroups.
>
> Positively nothing can ever be accomplished on an unmoderated newsgroup.
> Maybe in the the early days it made some sense, but it doesn't anymore. I
> would like to see Usenet down away with. It is a remnant from the early days
> of the Internet and has now become only a vehicle for fools like you and me.
> Note how even Tom Sherman has given up on it. Anyone with any brains has
> long since left Usenet.
> [...]
Yew we've all heard this repetitious nonsense from you ad nauseum.
Yeah ... we've all heard this repetitious nonsense from you ad
nauseum. Usenet is the showcase for your harnessed ego ... your
cyberspace playpen. Without the lifeblood of the Usenet newsgroup to
sustain you, you have nothing and be nothing. If the Usenet newsgroup
were to disappear, you would disapper with it, so there would indeed
be bright side to its demise.
Edward Dolan
On Oct 5, 10:33 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:a1e72fc5-5601-4c0a...@y71g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
> [...]
>
> > Give me time to work up a tremble. I sincerely doubt that Tom Sherman
> > would ever do your bidding. I just knew that you could not refrain from
> > mentioning Ed Gin. The man though long gone still has you firmly in
> > his grasp and exerts an amazing degree of control over you. You
> > really need to let go. Have you discussed this oppressive fixation of
> > yours with your therapist?
>
> All Jim McNamara ever had to do was to tell Ed Gin to go fuck himself, but
> instead he took the bastard seriously and remonstrated with him. That is
> what comes of playing the role of a fool. Unfortunately, what they were
> doing to one another took down the newsgroup ARBR.
>>> You mean the newsgroup that you continue to post to ... that
newsgroup? Again you have proved that you are not a man of your
word. You just can't l refrain from mentioning Ed Gin, particularly
in this context. Ed Gin, though long gone continues to have you
firmly in his grasp. IN his absence he still exerts an amazing degree
of control over you. You really need to let go. Have you discussed
this oppressive fixation of yours with your therapist?
You mentioned him first so of course I had to also.
> > It just must really suck to be you.
>
> It would certainly suck to be me if I took any of this the least bit
> serious
> like you do. But I don't. I am laughing constantly as I post my messages
> to
> all the nuts and screwballs like you who infest unmoderated Usenet
> newsgroups.
>
> Positively nothing can ever be accomplished on an unmoderated newsgroup.
> Maybe in the the early days it made some sense, but it doesn't anymore. I
> would like to see Usenet down away with. It is a remnant from the early
> days
> of the Internet and has now become only a vehicle for fools like you and
> me.
> Note how even Tom Sherman has given up on it. Anyone with any brains has
> long since left Usenet.
> [...]
>>> Yew we've all heard this repetitious nonsense from you ad nauseum.
>>> Yeah ... we've all heard this repetitious nonsense from you ad
nauseum. Usenet is the showcase for your harnessed ego ... your
cyberspace playpen. Without the lifeblood of the Usenet newsgroup to
sustain you, you have nothing and be nothing. If the Usenet newsgroup
were to disappear, you would disapper with it, so there would indeed
be bright side to its demise.
ARBR is dead and gone and only you are unaware of it. I am here to preside
over the funeral - and to give Tom Sherman one last kick in his sorry ass.
JimmyMac
NOT SO ... you mentioned Ed Ginfirst in message #50!!!
> > > It just must really suck to be you.
>
> > It would certainly suck to be me if I took any of this the least bit
> > serious
> > like you do. But I don't. I am laughing constantly as I post my messages
> > to
> > all the nuts and screwballs like you who infest unmoderated Usenet
> > newsgroups.
>
> > Positively nothing can ever be accomplished on an unmoderated newsgroup.
> > Maybe in the the early days it made some sense, but it doesn't anymore. I
> > would like to see Usenet down away with. It is a remnant from the early
> > days
> > of the Internet and has now become only a vehicle for fools like you and
> > me.
> > Note how even Tom Sherman has given up on it. Anyone with any brains has
> > long since left Usenet.
> > [...]
> >>> Yew we've all heard this repetitious nonsense from you ad nauseum.
> >>> Yeah ... we've all heard this repetitious nonsense from you ad
>
> nauseum. Usenet is the showcase for your harnessed ego ... your
> cyberspace playpen. Without the lifeblood of the Usenet newsgroup to
> sustain you, you have nothing and be nothing. If the Usenet newsgroup
> were to disappear, you would disappear with it, so there would indeed
Edward Dolan
Nope, look to the top of this post where you mention his name! In any event,
my messages appear not to be numbered and I am not ever going to bother with
the Google Groups website for anything. Only neophytes use Google Groups to
post messages.
[...]
JimmyMac
B U L L S H I T !!!!! I was specifically referring to your mention
in the obvious context that you usually use the man's name, but just
the same you started this thread and in the very first post wrote ...
I understood Ed Gin from his very first post to ARBR. He was clearly a
criminal scum bag of the worst sort and that is how I reacted to him.
There you have it PROOF that you were first in mentioning Ed Gin. My
mention of him is always in the form of an objection to you mentioning
Ed Gin or haven't you taken notice. You sure are dense.
Edward Dolan
I am only going by what I see in this post. You mention him first and then I
mention him. As you should well know by now, I never look up anything on
these fucking newsgroups.
>>>>>> There you have it PROOF that you were first in mentioning Ed Gin. My
mention of him is always in the form of an objection to you mentioning
Ed Gin or haven't you taken notice. You sure are dense.
You needed to repost the original message in this post so I could see what
you are blathering about. However, My Greatness prevents me from reviewing
any previous posts. I leave that chore to lesser beings such as yourself.
JimmyMac
Thanks for making my point regarding just how DENSE you are. I
referred to the very first post in this thread that you initiated and
quoted what you wrote. Is that not sufficient blockhead? Must the
GRATE one be spoon fed to keep up to speed??? OK ... here it is since
you are too lazy to refer back to what you wrote. I await your
retraction that I first mention Ed GIn since the evidence contradicts
your errant, unsubstantiated assertion....
Your post that initiate theis thread...
Tom Sherman and I are both essentially responders. We know how to
answer
others with either information or put downs, whatever the occasion
calls
for. We are not originators of posts by and large.
---------- AND HERE IT IS !!!!! ----------
===> I understood Ed Gin from his very first post to ARBR. He was
clearly a
criminal scum bag of the worst sort and that is how I reacted to him.
<===
----------------------------------
S E E I T N O W ????
----------------------------------
JimmyMac was a poor lost soul who did not have a clue about how to
treat
criminal human trash like Ed Gin. However, I do not hold him nearly as
culpable as I do Tom Sherman. Why? Because Tom Sherman is intelligent
and
yet he stood by silently and let the criminal vandal troll destroy
ARBR.
Tom Sherman was the mainstay of this newsgroup from the beginning as
far as
I could tell. It was up to him to defend this newsgroup, but instead
he took
a powder. The posts between Ed Gin and myself quickly resorted to
nothing
but the most vile name calling. The only one who could have brought
some
order to the insanity was Tom Sherman. I simply do not understand such
cowardice in the face of the enemy.
Courage is the greatest of all the virtues because it makes all the
other
virtues possible. It was a total no brainer to know how to respond to
the
criminal vandal troll Ed Gin and yet Tom Sherman did not care enough
to
respond. That is why he is an enigma - at least to me.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
Edward Dolan
Ed,
>This is an old thread (Sept. 24) that only a numskull like you would
>continue to post to. Either get up-to-date or get lost!
JimmyMac
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:0d00c99d-b6ab-4ca7...@v39g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
> Ed,
>
> Thanks for making my point regarding just how DENSE you are. I
> referred to the very first post in this thread that you initiated and
> quoted what you wrote. Is that not sufficient blockhead? Must the
> GRATE one be spoon fed to keep up to speed??? OK ... here it is since
> you are too lazy to refer back to what you wrote. I await your
> retraction that I first mention Ed GIn since the evidence contradicts
> your errant, unsubstantiated assertion....
>
> Your post that initiate theis thread...
>
> Tom Sherman and I are both essentially responders. We know how to
> answer
> others with either information or put downs, whatever the occasion
> calls
> for. We are not originators of posts by and large.
>
> ---------- AND HERE IT IS !!!!! ----------
>
> ===> I understood Ed Gin from his very first post to ARBR. He was
> clearly a
> criminal scum bag of the worst sort and that is how I reacted to him.
> <===
>
> ----------------------------------
> S E E I T N O W ????
> ----------------------------------
>
I am still waiting for you to admit that you mnhtioed Ed GIn first
after accusing me of having done so. Your retraction is past due. I
see that again you have mentioned Ed Gin immediately below. Wll you
never be free of your obsessive vexation?
> JimmyMac was a poor lost soul who did not have a clue about how to
> treat
> criminal human trash like Ed Gin. However, I do not hold him nearly as
> culpable as I do Tom Sherman. Why? Because Tom Sherman is intelligent
> and
> yet he stood by silently and let the criminal vandal troll destroy
> ARBR.
I think everyone got your twisted take on all this with the first one
thousand utterances.
> Tom Sherman was the mainstay of this newsgroup from the beginning as
> far as
> I could tell. It was up to him to defend this newsgroup, but instead
> he took
> a powder. The posts between Ed Gin and myself quickly resorted to
> nothing
> but the most vile name calling. The only one who could have brought
> some
> order to the insanity was Tom Sherman. I simply do not understand such
> cowardice in the face of the enemy.
>
> Courage is the greatest of all the virtues because it makes all the
> other
> virtues possible. It was a total no brainer to know how to respond to
> the
> criminal vandal troll Ed Gin and yet Tom Sherman did not care enough
> to
> respond. That is why he is an enigma - at least to me.
This is all sounding familiar. Are you sure that you've not said any
of this before?
> >This is an old thread (Sept. 24) that only a numskull like you would
> >continue to post to. Either get up-to-date or get lost!
> >Regards,
Either admit that I was falsely accused of being the first to mention
Ed Gin in this thread or just shut the fuck up ... LIAR!!!
Edward Dolan
On Oct 14, 12:41 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
Blah, blah, blah ...
This thread died long ago. The only one beating a dead horse is you!
Regards,
JimmyMac
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:8ac45047-a50e-4e2c...@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 14, 12:41 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> [...]
>
> Blah, blah, blah ...
>
> This thread died long ago. The only one beating a dead horse is you!
Oh you'd like it dead, so you can sweep another of your lies under the
carpet.
I am still waiting for you to admit that you mentioned Ed Gin first
after accusing me of having done so. Your retraction is past due.
Either admit that I was falsely accused of being the first to mention
Ed Gin in this thread or just shut the fuck up ... LIAR!!!
> Regards,
Edward Dolan
On Oct 19, 10:07 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:8ac45047-a50e-4e2c...@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 14, 12:41 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:> "JimmyMac"
> <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> [...]
>
> Blah, blah, blah ...
>
> This thread died long ago. The only one beating a dead horse is you!
>> Oh you'd like it dead, so you can sweep another of your lies under the
carpet.
>> I am still waiting for you to admit that you mentioned Ed Gin first
after accusing me of having done so. Your retraction is past due.
>> Either admit that I was falsely accused of being the first to mention
Ed Gin in this thread or just shut the fuck up ... LIAR!!!
"Blah, blah, blah ...
This thread died long ago. The only one beating a dead horse is you!" - Ed
Dolan
JimmyMac
You'd like for this thread to be dead, so you can sweep another
of your lies under the carpet.
I am still waiting for you to admit that you mentioned Ed Gin first
after accusing me of having done so. Your retraction is past due.
Either admit that I was falsely accused of being the first to mention
Ed Gin in this thread or just shut the fuck up ... LIAR!!!
Edward Dolan
ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
> Be a man ... own up and suck it up.
> You'd like for this thread to be dead, so you can sweep another
of your lies under the carpet.
> I am still waiting for you to admit that you mentioned Ed Gin first
after accusing me of having done so. Your retraction is past due.
> Either admit that I was falsely accused of being the first to mention
Ed Gin in this thread or just shut the fuck up ... LIAR!!!
Why not run this entire thread past your wife and see what she thinks of it?
She was dumb for marrying you of course, but I doubt she is as crazy as you
are.
JimmyMac
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
>
> ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
>
> > Be a man ... own up and suck it up.
> > You'd like for this thread to be dead, so you can sweep another
>
> of your lies under the carpet.
>
> > I am still waiting for you to admit that you mentioned Ed Gin first
>
> after accusing me of having done so. Your retraction is past due.
>
> > Either admit that I was falsely accused of being the first to mention
>
> Ed Gin in this thread or just shut the fuck up ... LIAR!!!
>
> Why not run this entire thread past your wife and see what she thinks of it?
> She was dumb for marrying you of course, but I doubt she is as crazy as you
> are.
Diversion duly noted. Ed Dolan simply cannot admit to being wrong ...
NOT EVER as it is apparently a sign of weakness or imperfection. Well
he's wrong here, but just won't admit it and suck it up. Instead he
resorts to an irrelevant, tangential issue. This issue has nothing to
do with my sanity,, my wife's sanity, my wife's intelligence or my
wife's opinion about this thread. This is about a false accusation
made by Ed Dolan that he refuses to acknowledge and/or retract and
that's that on that. The bottom line is that Ed Doalan got cuahgt in
a lie and he wants me to stop talking about it. I will ... just as
soon as Ed comes clean.
Edward Dolan
> Why not run this entire thread past your wife and see what she thinks of
> it?
> She was dumb for marrying you of course, but I doubt she is as crazy as
> you
> are.
>> Diversion duly noted. Ed Dolan simply cannot admit to being wrong ...
NOT EVER as it is apparently a sign of weakness or imperfection. Well
he's wrong here, but just won't admit it and suck it up. Instead he
resorts to an irrelevant, tangential issue. This issue has nothing to
do with my sanity,, my wife's sanity, my wife's intelligence or my
wife's opinion about this thread. This is about a false accusation
made by Ed Dolan that he refuses to acknowledge and/or retract and
that's that on that. The bottom line is that Ed Doalan got cuahgt in
a lie and he wants me to stop talking about it. I will ... just as
soon as Ed comes clean.'
The bottom line is that JimmyMac is afraid to run any of this past his wife.
He is dumb, but just smart enough to know that his wife would despise him
for playing the fool on Usenet. If she knew what he was up to, she would
lose what little respect for him she may still have. JimmyMac is afraid his
wife will leave him and then he will be left with just his two poor old
longsuffering hound dogs. Imagine a marriage where a husband is ashamed to
show his wife what he is doing on Usenet!
JimmyMac
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
>
> ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
>
> > Be a man ... own up and suck it up.
> > You'd like for this thread to be dead, so you can sweep another
>
> of your lies under the carpet.
>
> > I am still waiting for you to admit that you mentioned Ed Gin first
>
> after accusing me of having done so. Your retraction is past due.
>
> > Either admit that I was falsely accused of being the first to mention
>
> Ed Gin in this thread or just shut the fuck up ... LIAR!!!
>
> Why not run this entire thread past your wife and see what she thinks of it?
> She was dumb for marrying you of course, but I doubt she is as crazy as you
> are.
Here's a WHY NOT for you. Why not admit that you were wrong and
retract what you wrote? Being wrong about something is not an
imperfection or sign of weakness, so why are you incapable of ever
admitting that you are wrong, even when it is so obvious that you
are? Your thinly veiled diversion aside, it would be pointless to run
this thread by my wife. She has more that a sufficient caseload at
the moment. You will just have to find yourself another therapist to
unscramble your deranged psyche. This is not about intelligence or
craziness (mine or my wife's). This is about you getting caught u pin
a fallacious statement an your unwillingness to own up and suck it
up. Sure you want for this thread to go away and it will ... just as
soon as you come clean.
JimmyMac
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:944f06bb-2c44-4498...@l77g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 24, 2:16 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> [...]
>
> > Why not run this entire thread past your wife and see what she thinks of
> > it?
> > She was dumb for marrying you of course, but I doubt she is as crazy as
> > you
> > are.
> >> Diversion duly noted. Ed Dolan simply cannot admit to being wrong ...
>
> NOT EVER as it is apparently a sign of weakness or imperfection. Well
> he's wrong here, but just won't admit it and suck it up. Instead he
> resorts to an irrelevant, tangential issue. This issue has nothing to
> do with my sanity,, my wife's sanity, my wife's intelligence or my
> wife's opinion about this thread. This is about a false accusation
> made by Ed Dolan that he refuses to acknowledge and/or retract and
> that's that on that. The bottom line is that Ed Doalan got cuahgt in
> a lie and he wants me to stop talking about it. I will ... just as
> soon as Ed comes clean.'
>
> The bottom line is that JimmyMac is afraid to run any of this past his wife.
The bottom line is that ...this has nothing to do with my wife, 2. I
am not afraid to run any of this past her, 3. As I informed you
countless times in the past, my wife has indicated that she is not the
least bit interested in you or your nonsense and has no intention
becoming involved in any of this and is puzzled that I waste so much
time to a jerk like you. 4. You continue to ignore number 3.
> He is dumb, but just smart enough to know that his wife would despise him
> for playing the fool on Usenet. If she knew what he was up to, she would
> lose what little respect for him she may still have. JimmyMac is afraid his
> wife will leave him and then he will be left with just his two poor old
> longsuffering hound dogs. Imagine a marriage where a husband is ashamed to
> show his wife what he is doing on Usenet!
See Number 2 above. Imagine a misogynistic closet queen who has never
has and never will experiencing the joys of sharing anything
MEANINGFUL with a wife. His long suffering cats are a poor
substitute.
Edward Dolan
So run this thread past her and report back to me. It is important that she
read every word in the thread. I don't trust you to tell her the truth about
anything.
> He is dumb, but just smart enough to know that his wife would despise him
> for playing the fool on Usenet. If she knew what he was up to, she would
> lose what little respect for him she may still have. JimmyMac is afraid
> his
> wife will leave him and then he will be left with just his two poor old
> longsuffering hound dogs. Imagine a marriage where a husband is ashamed to
> show his wife what he is doing on Usenet!
>>> See Number 2 above. Imagine a misogynistic closet queen who has never
has and never will experiencing the joys of sharing anything
MEANINGFUL with a wife. His long suffering cats are a poor
substitute.
"So run this thread past her and report back to me. It is important that she
read every word in the thread. I don't trust you to tell her the truth about
anything." - Ed Dolan
JimmyMac
I don't dance to your music. Go back and read numbers 3 and 4.
> > He is dumb, but just smart enough to know that his wife would despise him
> > for playing the fool on Usenet. If she knew what he was up to, she would
> > lose what little respect for him she may still have. JimmyMac is afraid
> > his
> > wife will leave him and then he will be left with just his two poor old
> > longsuffering hound dogs. Imagine a marriage where a husband is ashamed to
> > show his wife what he is doing on Usenet!
> >>> See Number 2 above. Imagine a misogynistic closet queen who has never
>
> has and never will experiencing the joys of sharing anything
> MEANINGFUL with a wife. His long suffering cats are a poor
> substitute.
>
> "So run this thread past her and report back to me. It is important that she
> read every word in the thread. I don't trust you to tell her the truth about
> anything." - Ed Dolan
I don't dance to your music. Go back and read numbers 3 and 4.