i think it's a bad idea, but that's just me.
>http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000HVRNKM/downandoutint-20
>
>i think it's a bad idea, but that's just me.
Yeah, I kind of agree. I don't have a problem with tats for adults
and even the temp ones for kids, but this is definitely something I
wouldn't buy.
Nan
nanner wrote:
> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000HVRNKM/downandoutint-20
>
> i think it's a bad idea, but that's just me.
>
/raises hand!
Yep... bad idea.
Anni
>
I'm wonder how much it costs - there's no price, because the item is
"currently not available". I have no problem with it, but my kids are too
old for it and it's probably something they would tire of quickly anyway.
I see nothing wrong with it! It's a job, like any other thing. Toy Doctor's
kits don't encourage kids to cut each other open, right? There's nothing
dangerous or bad about giving fake tattoos.
Marie
I wasnt thinking the idea of them giving the tatoo was bad.. I was thinking
the cost of a vibrating pen was a bad idea.. lol.. and isnt writing on
yourself with pen suposed to be bad?
Tori
This makes it even easier to identify the white trash in our midst.
If you tried to get the government to brand this scum there would be
outcries - better to let the trailer trash brand themselves.
The tattooed adults are whores, criminals and the retarded - their
illustrated appendages warning the unsuspecting.
Instead of the expensive toy, we should encourage the yutes to use permanent
Sharpies (C) on their faces (feces).
"nanner" <nos...@nospam.nospam> wrote in message
news:Y9n8h.46$Dg...@newsfe12.lga...
If , instead of a couple of grungy boys applying flame tattoos, the ad
showed a couple of girls painting on girly glittery sparklies, everyone
would be like "aww, cute!"
> Are ya nuts!!!!!!!
> Man this would give them BAD Ideas....maybe put a age limit
> on it, like from 15 up ...lol
on the contrary, most kids who get tattoos are rebelling
against thier parents by doing something the parent is likely
to disapprove of (note i said kids, not adults).
buy the kid a toy tattoo kit when they are young & well,
there goes *that* means of rebellion ;)
that said, i doubt i'd bother with it as it's very limited.
if there are only 3 colors of markers & no refills available,
it's not worth the expense (unless it's under $10, which i
highly doubt). i have no issues with kids drawing on
themselves or each other though, so YMMV.
lee
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if
there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of
blindfolded
fear. - Thomas Jefferson
Probably.. but I still wouldnt buy it...
Tori
> If , instead of a couple of grungy boys applying flame
> tattoos, the ad showed a couple of girls painting on girly
> glittery sparklies, everyone would be like "aww, cute!"
pretty much...
which makes me wonder how exponentially popular tattoos would
become if someone invented a glitter ink...
personally, if i were to get a tattoo, i want that invisible
ink that glows under blacklight. that stuff is so cool! :)
lee <or glow-in-the-dark ink...>
I have never seen one of those tattoos actually glow in a blacklight.
Marie
My mom has a tattoo of a unicorn on her chest low enough for most shirts to
cover it but not on her breast really and one day bonnie came up to me and
said "Mommy I want a unicorn picture on my booby just like Grammie."
I actualy have thought about getting a little tattoo but I cant see spending
$30+ on one.. now if they had free single color tattoo day I would concider
it :P
Tori
If I had a fit everytime my kids drew on themselves I would be hospitalized
from heart falure by now.
My inlaws dont understand my attitude of "it is just ink it will wash off."
Tori
>If I had a fit everytime my kids drew on themselves I would be hospitalized
>from heart falure by now.
>My inlaws dont understand my attitude of "it is just ink it will wash off."
>Tori
Neither does my dh. He hates when E draws on herself but I figure,
"Hey, at least she's not drawing on the wall!" ;-)
Nan
>If , instead of a couple of grungy boys applying flame tattoos, the ad
>showed a couple of girls painting on girly glittery sparklies, everyone
>would be like "aww, cute!"
True, and I wondered why they used boys that look like miniature
versions of Blue Collar TV for the ad. Although my dd would prefer
the flame tattoo over girly sparkly things any day.
Nan
> On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:06:00 -0600, "Tori M"
> <angel...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>If I had a fit everytime my kids drew on themselves I would
>>be hospitalized from heart falure by now.
>>My inlaws dont understand my attitude of "it is just ink it
>>will wash off."
>
> Neither does my dh. He hates when E draws on herself but I
> figure, "Hey, at least she's not drawing on the wall!" ;-)
in my house, the kid *is* more washable than the walls :)
tattoos are no big deal (except to some religious groups, but
that's not my problem, is it? <g>)
>Nan <dontbo...@home.com> wrote in
>news:ske6m25dhtsnref5a...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:06:00 -0600, "Tori M"
>> <angel...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>If I had a fit everytime my kids drew on themselves I would
>>>be hospitalized from heart falure by now.
>>>My inlaws dont understand my attitude of "it is just ink it
>>>will wash off."
>>
>> Neither does my dh. He hates when E draws on herself but I
>> figure, "Hey, at least she's not drawing on the wall!" ;-)
>
> in my house, the kid *is* more washable than the walls :)
> tattoos are no big deal (except to some religious groups, but
>that's not my problem, is it? <g>)
>lee
Yep, E being washable is why I don't worry about it. To me, drawing
on herself just isn't that big of a deal. Dh thought we were weird
when we drew smile faces on our toe nails with permanent marker a week
ago.... it's just now starting to wear off ;-)
Nan
Ugh. I personally think tattoos are a form of mutilation
and generally hideous, so the idea of the toy really turns
me off.
We had a freshman (age 14?) at our high school here whose legs were
tattooed from the top of her foot up to God knows where, in an overall
pattern of paisley, in purples and oranges. Unless she was planning a
career as an exotic dancer, I can't imagine what the benefit would be.
I'm assuming her father or other family member did it, as I can't
imagine the cost being borne by a kid.
gloria p
Amanda
--
*smile it'll get better!*
"enigma" <eni...@empire.net> wrote in message
news:Xns988267B4D3E4...@199.125.85.9...
Really?
Kids are all about the disposable income. Save up allowance and birthday
money year by year or month by month and pay to have a little more done.
Hey, hey, hey. . . . . yer dissin' my tatts! LOL!
I met a woman whose legs were terribly disfigured by the scars from a
fire. She has leaves and vines tattooed on then to cover the scarring.
Looked kind of cool, but if it were I, I'd be wearing long pants at the
job interview and on the job,
--
-Barb
http://jamlady.eboard.com
http://web.mac.com/barbschaller; blahblahblog, Apple Pie, 10-29-2006