Get Laid Newsletter, Issue #10
Ross Jeffries
Ross Jeffries'
Get Laid/PersuasionNEWSLETTER!!!!
------------------------------------------------------
6245 Bristol Parkway, Suite 275 April/May
Culver, City CA 90230 1996
(310) 822-5771
World Wide Web Site: http://www.seduction.com
E-mail: sand...@via.net
How To Totally Mind-Fuck Almost ANY Woman Into Screwing Your Brains
Out...And Make It Seem Like You're Just Having A Normal,
Innocent, Conversation!
Dear Friend and Wild-Eyed Fan!
First, please accept my apologies for the lateness of this letter.
We're going to make up for it by giving you some KILLER stuff in this
issue, but just to let you know:
1. We moved. This took up massive amounts of my time, energy and focus,
finding a place, taking care of some legal crap,etc.
2. For you folks reading this on the net, our Web master, Lew DePayne ALSO
moved, way up north, and had to piss his time away on unimportant stuff
like finding a place to live, getting furniture.
But enough chit chat. Let's get on to more important stuff like...
Conversational Structures That Getting Laid As Easy As Getting Wet In A
Thunderstorm!
Listen: recently I was giving yet ANOTHER interview to a "writer" who
is doing a story on yours truly.(In fact, I think actually convinced this
initially skeptical, almost nasty guy to write a POSITIVE story...how's
that for persuasion! I'll tell you how I did it in the P.P.P.S. to this
issue!)
Anyway, this would-be Ernest Hemingway wanted me to sum up Speed
Seduction in a nutshell. I said, "It's basically about two things.
First, knowing how to talk to women in suggestive ways that lead and
excite their imaginations, and, just as important, knowing how to do that
in a conversational framwework that makes it all seem like a normal,
natural conversation."
]
It's the second part that I'd like to discuss with you in this newsletter.
The 3-Deep Principle; Your Key To Massive Get Laid Success
As you know by now, one of the main techniques of Speed Seduction is to
describe the state or states we want a woman in.
Let's stop for a sec for a pop quiz, to see if you understand this
important point. Circle the right answer
Describing states to a woman is important because:
A. It distracts her attention from the fact that we are whacking off under
the table.
B. It shows her how clever and smart we are
C. It gives her an intellectual understanding of the subject matter.
D. There's no difference between a powerful set of directions and a
skillful description; describing puts HER in the state or states.
Ok. We all answered D, right?
Now that we are SURE you've mastered that principle, let me give you
another one; when it comes to suggestions, commands, presuppositions or
whatever else you are using, it's extremely powerful and effective to
"stack" them at least THREE levels deep.
See, what happens is, for reasons I'm not even sure of, once the mind
accepts three examples, descriptions, suggestions, etc, all headed in the
same direction, it just can't resist. It accepts these as being it's own,
and therefore it tends to.....
....Overpoweringly Act On Them!
Is that fair? Is it right to overwhelmingly mind-fuck a woman in that
way? Isn't it enough to gently nudge a woman's mind in the right
direction...the most gentle, caring little push so that she naturally
finds her way to us with a bare bones miminmum of suggestion on our part?
Suuuuuure it is...and, hold on a sec while I take this call from the
Easter Bunny!
Listen; I'm all for gentleness, but ya gotta use these tools
powerfully.......you can be gentle later...when she's gobbling your tube
steak!
So, now that I've got that set up, let me show you some of these
conversational structures.
Variation #1: Quote An Article, Seminar, T.V. Show,etc.
Let's say you wanted to start out with a connection pattern, and move
from there. One way to start would be by quoting something you read, saw
or heard in the media.
This is, after all, a normal way for people to converse...quoting
something they've seen. So, in this case, you'd start out by saying
something like,
"You know...I was reading the most interesting article about how men and
women fall in love differently. And it was saying that men usually feel
an attraction first, but that women, by contrast, usually feel a
connection and then become more attracted. I mean, you know that kind of
special connection you sometimes feel...that mysterious compelling click
that takes place right THERE..."
You then go on to do the connection pattern for a while, and say,
"So...this article was saying, that when it's really special...that's when
you can just STOP..and IMAGINE a time in future...say years from
now...blah blah blah".
Ok...that's stacked it one level. And it seems like a normal
conversation. You then listen for her feedback, if she gives you any, and
then proceed to go to...
... Step Two: Quote What A "Friend" Had To Say To You About It!
Ok. Now, you can quite agreeably move on to tell her what your friend
had to say about it. You can either hit on the same theme, or add in
something else your friend said,
You: You know, I was telling my friend about this, and she was saying,
when she really starts to FEEL THAT CONNECTION.....and GROW even more
attracted..she begins to pay attention in a special way. First, becomes
aware...of the rhythm of her breathing...the beating of her heart...and
that sense of growing fascination...such that as she continues to be aware
oll this...one particuliar feature of the guys face begins to rivet her
attention...so as she just continue to keep looking.it's like the rest of
the enviroment disappears...and the entire world becomes this face...this
voice that just start to wrap itself around her like a pair of powerful
but gentle arms...pulling her in...deeper....just allowing that
warmth..etc..etc
(Of course, if you're sharp, you'll recognize this as an adaptation of
my "stacking realities" pattern from my original classic book, "How To Get
The Women You Desire Into Bed". If you've got the book, go back and
re-read Chapter 18..if not..call Yates and BUY a copy NOW! 703-791-6421!)
Well...so now you've got her really sizzling, right? What could we do
to stack one more level? Well, Buckwheat..how's about...
Step 3: Giving Her YOUR Opinion On the Subject!!
Now, what could be more natural after all this then throwing in YOUR
opinion on the subject? And..of course...you could take it anywhere
You: Now...what really fascinates me about all this is not just how people
connect so powerfully with someone...but how people connect with their own
needs and wants and desires...like..think about the difference between
compulsions and anticipation....
Here of course, you launch into my famous "Blow Job Pattern" which I
won't go into in full here, since it is contained in it's entirety, word
for friggin' brilliant word, in my Advanced Speed Seduction Home Study
Course....(703)791-6421...NOW!
As an interesting side note to this "three level stacking"...my top
student, Mark Cunningham, as pointed out that this pattern really helps to
"normalize" the responses she has.
In other words...by quoting something you've seen or heard or read in
the media...you're keeping it several steps
removed from her. It's not like SHE is the one having the response.
You then move closer to her with each step...by describing a female
friend's opinion or response, that moves it a step closer to being
her...it's saying another woman has these responses.
To move it even closer, when you give you're opinion, throw in an
"I-You" shift, by saying something like, "I find when I HAVE THOSE
RESPONSES...it's like you just LET YOURSELF GO COMPLETELY...and GO WILD
WITH IT...NOW...That's how I see it so clearly..".
Now...are there OTHER ways to use this structure? Sure...you could for
example, start off by quoting the friend and THEN moving on to quoting
something you saw, read, or heard in the media, and then finish with your
opinion. That will work just as well.
I do NOT however, recommend you start out with your opinion first...as
that might make you seem like a self-focused, arrogant, selfish bastard.
You want to HIDE that fact; not expose it!
The Mail Bag
Ross:
How you doin' bud. I wish I could have stayed longer at your last
seminar. The stuff I heard in the short time I was there was killer, so
I'm sure I missed some other killer stuff.
The one pattern I did hear was the one where you start off quoting a
"public" authority ("I saw something interesting on TV Š"), then quoting
a friend ("My friend Kim says that when that happens to herŠ") then
quoting yourself ("And I think that when that happens Š").
Do you realize how brilliant this pattern is? Even when this pattern
is used without weasle phrases and embedded commands, it still works great
because it takes full advantage of several of Cialdini's "weapons of
automatic influence."
First, it uses the weapon of authority. Three people are saying the
same thing so it must be true. Second, it uses the weapon of social
acceptance. Three people believe this to be true, so I shold believe it
too.
Finally, it uses the magic of the number three. Like you told us that
three presuppositions heading in the same direction will cause a person to
presume that it is true, it is also true with three authorities or three
socially acceptable persons. I've found that any information, be it
evidence in a lawsuit,emotional states for seduction or persuasion,or even
examples of proof, presented three times in three unique ways has
an almost magical effect on people. They tend to accept it automatically
without even thinking about it.
I have been using a personal version of this pattern for a while
without knowing I was doing it. Since the seminar, I have modified it and
used in in business situations, in social situations (including sport
wenching), and with my wife and our daughter, (The kid is 17, and needs
some serious re-programming and de-programming. What can I say, she's a
teenager. She knows everything and she's always right). It is extremely
effective the vast majority of the time.
Also, if you want some cool info on mind control and behavior
modification, check out an article on the web called "Spiritual
Responsibility" by Steven
Hassan and Lama Surya Das. It discusses behavior control, thought
control, and emotional control, plus gives you "The Three Steps of Gaining
Control of the Mind." The article is about religious cults, but we can
modify it for wenching.
Mark C.,
Santa Ana, Ca
Dear Mark,
Eeenie, meanie, Cialdini, Ross has got a giant weenie!
Hey...if there's one thing I can't stand, it's a pandering letter,
agreeing with me, supply yet more evidence that everything I have to say
is true, and making me look like even more of a genius.
Seriously, thank you for your very kind and intelligent letter. While I
realize the brilliance of the pattern I did NOT, I confess, see the
Cialdini angle. I think the social acceptance angle is of greater import
on that score; I don't know that people would necessarily accept a T.V.
show or an anonymous friend of someone they just met as any kind of
"authority" on any subject. If they do, then they are
malleable little sheep who deserve the ass-ramming life gives them!
Speaking of which...how many times have I told you guys to STOP
applying these tools in other areas of your life, besides sex. Mark...I
must insist that you use these skills ONLY for seduction and not to
improve every other area of your make your entire existence a fun-filled
party! So knock it off...ok.
And...how about a picture of your 17 year old? I've got a Catholic
school girl outfit I can loan her.
(received via internet e-mail)
From: GOLD...@UTSW.SWMED.EDU
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 12:04:40 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Ok, here it is.
To: sand...@via.net
MIME-version: 1.0
Status:
I have heard over and over again from women how their ideal date
involves the man cooking them dinner. You have pointed out that the best
places to
pick up women are those where they go to eat. Women are truly slaves to
the sensuality of food. If you make a dinner, you are providing them with
sensual
pleasure that they will associate with you.
Moreover, there is an air of competence and self-assurance that this
automatically gives a man in their eyes. Women LOVE feeling taken care of
and provided for (for obvious evolutionary reasons), and you making them
dinner brings all of that. Last, but very much not least, this turns your
date, instead of an encounter in a public place, into a private
rendez-vous in a place where you can go right to bed when you decide to
make your move.
It is very disappointing to have the occasional problem where during
the date the woman is quite ready to go and in the right frame of mind,
but during the drive back, in spite of all thought-binding strategies, she
slips out of the mood, either due to
internal considerations, or due to something that happens (believe me,
anything close to an accident, or getting pulled over, or even passing by
something bad like a bust or an accident can pull a woman out of that warm
glow that she is in when she is ready and willing)
On a final note, food gives a GREAT lead in for sexual metaphor. For
all these reasons, whatever strategy or pattern you were going to run on
her, doing it in the context of a date at her apartment when you've just
finished a dinne that you prepared is
going to make it ten times more likely to succeed.
As I've already said, this is good for just getting laid, but if you
want to do the serious relationship thing, this will sure start it off
with a
bang (so to speak). If you want to just get laid, then keep lightly in
touch with her afterwards anyway. When she describes the evening to her
friends, believe me all the ones who are single (and some who aren't) are
going to wish they got that treatment, and then you can scam on them as well.
Well, Ross, what do you think?
Greg
Dear Greg,
What's that...SCAM on the friends of someone you are already banging?
How dare you sir...have you no decency?
Actually...I like your style, in terms of having them in a place where
you can "close the deal" right away. I do think that if you can create the
requisite rapport to get a strange woman to come over to your place, then
you probably could move right on to a sexual arousal strategy. If she's at
all adventurous, she'll jump you then and there, no matter where you are.
I know this is true from my own experience and those students who have
told me time and again that they've banged women on the hoods of cars,
underneath swing sets in parks, parking lots, etc. If they are hot and
bothered enough, they'll come at you no matter where you are!
But...congratulations on finding a variation that works for you, and I
am VERY proud to see my students dovetailing what I teach with
sociological and other factors that all move to get the same
results...getting their weenies wet!
(received via internet e-mail)
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 20:51:11 -0500
From: <Mi...@world.std.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: Ross Jeffries <sand...@via.net>
Subject: Is there a happy customer in Boston?
Status:
Hey Ross,
I bought your first book "How To Get The Women You Want Into Bed."
I never tried out your practices, which probably explains why I go through
more Vaseline than rubbers. I'm thinking about buying a book or two more
(not sure yet which ones) and making a serious effort towards
trying your methods.
I'd like to communicate with someone who has made it work. Is there a
satisified customer in the Boston area who would be willing to talk to me
either by phone or by e-mail about how it's worked for him?
Thanks,
Mike
P.S. Have you stopped putting Get Laid Newsletters on the Web?
Dear Mike,
I am printing your letter here in the newsletter and direct any takers
to please contact you via your e-mail address cited above.
I don't know why you haven't tried out my stuff; it certainly does NO
good to just read it and then not DO IT...now, don't you think so as well?
And, no. We haven't stopped putting the newsletters on the web. I've
just been too buried in bullshit to be bringing on brilliance. I'm back in
the swing of things now!
Ross's Plug Corner
Hey..this time I'm gonna plug an absolutely brilliant book that I'm not
even selling and don't even make so much as a penny off of!
It's an incredible book by my favorite marekting guru, Dan Kennedy,
called "How To Make Millions With Your Ideas". Dan's ideas have been
responsible for me making about 5 times as much money with a third of the
effort and expense.
He is a master marketer, not just on the small chunk levelslike how to
write brilliant sales copy, but also on the bigger chunk levels, like
which marketing models you should use; single step ads that sell right
away, multiple step models that get your prospect to jump through hoops to
pre-qualify themselves, etc.
To give you an idea of how good I think Dan is, I currently subscribe
to about 6 marketing newsletters, and his is the ONLY subscription I'm
gonna renew! You can reach Dan's office at 800-223-7180. Tell 'em you read
about him in the Get Laid Newsletter and that Ross Jeffries says "hi"!
Piece and Peace,
Ross
P.S. We are doing another killer Advanced Speed Seduction Seminar in Los
Angeles, May 17th, 18th and 19th. As a newsletter subscriber, you get
$100 off the admission price, plus, if you call 703-791-6421 by April 15,
we'll give you an additional $100 early sign-up discount...a total of $200
off! This one's gonna be the best we've done in a while because BOTH of
my top students, Mark Cunninghman AND Glen Hughes, have committed to be
there, and teach together with me. Three different styles...three
different masters to learn from! Getcha ass out here to L.A!
P.P.S. The newsletter discount is ONLY good for those who receive the
newsletter, hard-copy. Sorry web-readers....you gotta be a SUBSCIRBER. You
web-heads can STILL however, get the early sign-up discount...and we WILL
extend the $100 subscriber discount to you as well if you purchase
something from us of any value(no mimimum purchase..you just gotta buy
SOMETHING) by April 15th. That's like our PAYING for the first $100 of
stuff you buy from us by then! So whattya waiting for? Call Yates
now...703-791-6421.
P.P.P.S. How did I handle that snotty writer? Simple..first...I knew he
was a mismatcher or polarity responder. So I got rapport by saying,
"Look...I know the way you learn is to find counter-examples. And that's
very useful..a powerful way to guard yourself against error and untruths.
But what if what you are learning about is SO new..so revoluntionary..that
you've got nothing to compare it to? Then you just have to shut up....open
your mind...and listen!" Which he actually proceeded to exactly do!
Ha..that's handling the media!
--
Get Laid now!
Ask me how!
http://www.seduction.com for Free
Get Laid Newsletters!
Ross Jeffries
(Chris Belway) wrote:
> >
> > I can only say again, to all of these folks and anyone else I have
> >offended, I am truly, deeply sorry. People do weird things out of their
> >own pain, rather than face it and recognize it. If I make it through this
> >personal dark knight, I'll return a better person.
>
For those of you who are STILL being fooled by Bellway's immoral re-post
of my April Fool's, 1995 joke(wherein he conveniently FAILS to include the
APRIL FOOLS...SUCKERS!!! at the end) note my DELIBERATE mispelling of dark
night as dark knight..a joking reference to Batman, which the reader's of
my first book will understand.
Bellsy...you're a slimey, gut-punching, immoral cock-sucker...and ya
gotta admire that!
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Because, my dear brother,my observations lead me to suppose that
> free thinking women are monstrosities".-Bazarov, in Ivan
> Turgenev's "Fathers and Sons"
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Phil Jaquiery
>Ross Jeffries (sand...@via.net) writes:
[snip]
>Ross Jeffries <sand...@earthlink.net> on NLP wrote:
[and snip]
Hey dick head (bad choice of language, probably doesn't have a dick),
Ever heard the term "irony" before. Next time you are sittin in a corner
havin a wank on yer own dig out the dictionary and look it up. Then go read a
bit of stuff on the newsgroups and quoted in newspapers etc and see if you can
spot someone using it.
0 out of 10 - see me after class.
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>"Because, my dear brother,my observations lead me to suppose that
>free thinking women are monstrosities".-Bazarov, in Ivan
>Turgenev's "Fathers and Sons"
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least she/he/it quotes someone who has got some brains.
OPEN HEART MUSIC === Please excuse my questions. === OPEN HEART MUSIC
====== I am researching ways to make the world a better place. ======
---...@openhart.demon.co.uk----The Old George BBS +44 1264 781172---
----(Mr Musical)-------------Phil z'vil-------------(Mr Mystical)----
Phil Jaquiery
>
> Ross Jeffries'
> Get Laid/PersuasionNEWSLETTER!!!!
>------------------------------------------------------
[snip, sob, wipes tear away.]
>Get Laid now!
>Ask me how!
>http://www.seduction.com for Free
>Get Laid Newsletters!
Ross, nice ta see ya back with a vengence. If ya wanna convince me all ya
have ta do is practise what ya preach. Nice to see ya doin it.
Oh, and I *love* this trick of exagerating the opposite. You didn't point it
out at the time (maybe you are saving that one for some other time). I won't
point out where it cropped up in your newsletter (ya might ripp me ears off)
but I will explain the theory for those who missed it:
If you want to convince some one that statement 'A' is true and the opposite
view to 'A' can be represented by statement 'B' then DON'T say you believe 'A'
- that allows them the opportunity to point out that they don't believe 'A'.
What ya gotta do is tell them how much you believe statement 'B' and exagerate
'B' to such an extent that it will seem ridiculous. The effect of the is that
you will elicit the response "How could you *possibly* believe 'B'!!!" which
generates an automatic and undetected (by poor subject) agreement that it is
only possible to believe 'A'. Ergo. Better make sure you exagerate 'B' enuff
otherwise you might manage to convince them to believe it. Bit of work on
this and used in conjunction with the rest of Ross's techniques you should
have em climbin up the walls waitin to fuck ya.
I appreciated yer post Ross. Thanks.
Craig Rypstat
>>Ross Jeffries <sand...@earthlink.net> on NLP wrote:
>[and snip]
>
>Hey dick head (bad choice of language, probably doesn't have a dick),
>
>Ever heard the term "irony" before. Next time you are sittin in a >corner havin a wank on yer own dig out the dictionary and look =
it up. >Then go read a bit of stuff on the newsgroups and quoted in newspapers >etc and see if you can spot someone using it.
>
>0 out of 10 - see me after class.
>
>At least she/he/it quotes someone who has got some brains.
>
>OPEN HEART MUSIC === Please excuse my questions. === OPEN HEART MUSIC
>====== I am researching ways to make the world a better place. ======
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Let me suggest not insulting people who have an opinion or way of
living that is different than yours.
Peace,
Craig
Shawn Pickrell
[speed seduction stuff clipped]
I have no doubt it might work, but would I really want a woman whose mind is
so malleable?
In addition, I'm confused enough when I talk to people. Having to remember
this stuff might just overload my memory and cause a fatal system error or
a general protection fault.
********************************************************************
Sir Shawn, Knight of the Internet. * (In real life: Shawn Pickrell)
E-mail: spic...@endeavour.rmc.edu * (Romans 10:9-13)
http://bacardi.rmc.edu/~spickrel * http://bacardi.rmc.edu
"I kick ass for the Lord!"
Nick Deller
<rys...@aural.psych.wisc.fr> writes
>ph...@openhart.demon.co.uk (Phil Jaquiery) wrote:
>
<<Phil surprised us all by letting rip at someone...>>
>>OPEN HEART MUSIC === Please excuse my questions. === OPEN HEART MUSIC
>>====== I am researching ways to make the world a better place. ======
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Let me suggest not insulting people who have an opinion or way of
>living that is different than yours.
>
Jeez, that was a model of politeness for Phil! Let me tell you what Phil
hates, Craig. He hates people who write off an opinion or a person
because of the tone they adopt. He hates people who can't be arsed to
actually think about what someone's saying because they think they
already 'know'. I think he also hates having his opinions second-
guessed, which means I'M in trouble (again) ;-)
> Peace,
He'll like that sign-off though, I fancy... Don't overdo it though;
peace is all very well, but a nice bit of controlled conflict can be
quite productive too (and rather fun). Besides, _I_ thought the other
chap might be a little understaffed in the repro department - as it were
- as well... <G>
Sev!
Nick
--
"Planet of Blue, I love you, I love you..."
Leon
Phil Jaquiery
>Ross Jeffries (sand...@via.net) wrote:
>
>[speed seduction stuff clipped]
>
>I have no doubt it might work, but would I really want a woman whose mind is
>so malleable?
All women have mind that are so malleable. So do you d00d. How to you think
you got that idea in the first place?
>In addition, I'm confused enough when I talk to people. Having to remember
>this stuff might just overload my memory and cause a fatal system error or
>a general protection fault.
Tryin too hard Sir Shawn. Take some of yer shinin armour off and try it for a
while. Just a little at the time untill you've got the hang of it.
>********************************************************************
>Sir Shawn, Knight of the Internet. * (In real life: Shawn Pickrell)
>E-mail: spic...@endeavour.rmc.edu * (Romans 10:9-13)
>http://bacardi.rmc.edu/~spickrel * http://bacardi.rmc.edu
> "I kick ass for the Lord!"
DON'T DO THAT!!!!! Kick arse for the Ladies. They will think higher of you
for it than any Lord will do.
OPEN HEART MUSIC === Please excuse my questions. === OPEN HEART MUSIC
====== I am researching ways to make the world a better place. ======
Chris Belway
> bf...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Chris Belway) said something like:
> >Ross Jeffries (sand...@via.net) writes:
> [snip]
> >Ross Jeffries <sand...@earthlink.net> on NLP wrote:
> [and snip]
> Hey dick head (bad choice of language, probably doesn't have a dick),
> Ever heard the term "irony" before. Next time you are sittin in a corner
> havin a wank on yer own dig out the dictionary and look it up.
Oh, my. I do believe your hubris has gotten the best of you here. And, no
effort on my part.
Then go read a
> bit of stuff on the newsgroups and quoted in newspapers etc and see if you can
> spot someone using it.
> 0 out of 10 - see me after class.
No, I believe 10 out of 10 is the appropriate grade. Ask Jeem.
Ask Ross Jeffries himself, you sad sack.
C.
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >"Because, my dear brother,my observations lead me to suppose that
> >free thinking women are monstrosities".-Bazarov, in Ivan
> >Turgenev's "Fathers and Sons"
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------
"I had far rather walk, as I do, in daily terror of eternity, than feel
that this was a children's game in which all the contestants would get
equally worthless prizes in the end."
-T.S.Eliot
Nick Deller
<spic...@bacardi.rmc.edu> writes
>Ross Jeffries (sand...@via.net) wrote:
>
>[speed seduction stuff clipped]
>
>I have no doubt it might work, but would I really want a woman whose mind is
>so malleable?
'I have NO DOUBT it MIGHT work'??? Confidence, man, confidence! If it
didn't work, Ross couldn't use it to sell it to people who wanted it so
they could sell something else to people who didn't realise they wanted
it until they'd already been sold it. Comprendez?
>
>In addition, I'm confused enough when I talk to people.
HTH
>Having to remember
>this stuff might just overload my memory and cause a fatal system error or
>a general protection fault.
In my experience, generals don't NEED protecting. Nobody's fault. But
you might be surprised when you notice you don't need to remember to
remember to remember anyway, or notice doing it to do it. Am I overdoing
it? Take no notice!
> "I kick ass for the Lord!"
Well, whatever turns you on I suppose.
Deux bieres, s'il vous plait (never really got turned on by french
lessons, so this one's strictly from the phrasebook)
Phil Jaquiery
Nick Deller <ni...@kidney.demon.co.uk> said something like:
>In article <4i7fab$m...@news.doit.wisc.edu>, Craig Rypstat
><rys...@aural.psych.wisc.fr> writes
>>ph...@openhart.demon.co.uk (Phil Jaquiery) wrote:
>>
><<Phil surprised us all by letting rip at someone...>>
>
>>>OPEN HEART MUSIC === Please excuse my questions. === OPEN HEART MUSIC
>>>====== I am researching ways to make the world a better place. ======
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>> Let me suggest not insulting people who have an opinion or way of
>>living that is different than yours.
>>
>
>Jeez, that was a model of politeness for Phil! Let me tell you what Phil
>hates, Craig. He hates people who write off an opinion or a person
>because of the tone they adopt. He hates people who can't be arsed to
>actually think about what someone's saying because they think they
>already 'know'. I think he also hates having his opinions second-
>guessed, which means I'M in trouble (again) ;-)
>
>> Peace,
>
>He'll like that sign-off though, I fancy... Don't overdo it though;
>peace is all very well, but a nice bit of controlled conflict can be
>quite productive too (and rather fun). Besides, _I_ thought the other
>chap might be a little understaffed in the repro department - as it were
>- as well... <G>
>
>Sev!
>
>Nick
>--
>"Planet of Blue, I love you, I love you..."
> Leon
OPEN HEART MUSIC === Please excuse my questions. === OPEN HEART MUSIC
Kathy Diemer
> For those of you who are STILL being fooled by Bellway's immoral re-post
>of my April Fool's, 1995 joke(wherein he conveniently FAILS to include the
>APRIL FOOLS...SUCKERS!!! at the end) note my DELIBERATE mispelling of dark
>night as dark knight..a joking reference to Batman, which the reader's of
>my first book will understand.
> Bellsy...you're a slimey, gut-punching, immoral cock-sucker...and ya
>gotta admire that!
Is this one of your pick-up lines? WOW...I'm wet already!
Barry Moore
>Ross Jeffries (sand...@via.net) wrote:
>[speed seduction stuff clipped]
>I have no doubt it might work, but would I really want a woman whose mind is
>so malleable?
Not that I am plugging his work, because I think that one should be
"respectfull" in one's dealings with other people, but this stuff will
work on ANYONE, and in contexts other than just the one he is applying
it to.
>In addition, I'm confused enough when I talk to people. Having to remember
>this stuff might just overload my memory and cause a fatal system error or
>a general protection fault.
That is a comment on your perceived level of flexibility.
Regards.... BM
Michael Watson
> Now if you want to Bitch, or to BE ABUSIVE, or HUMILIATE
>YOURSELF!! NOW, GO somewhere were people CARE.. We are hear to learn
>SPEED SEDUCTION, that’s all.. that is why this News Group is called:
>alt.seduction.fast.. not for people with limited beliefs, or FRIGID
>SCHOOL GIRLS
Think again. This newsgroup is called
alt.psychology.nlp,soc.singles,alt.self-improvement,alt.hypnosis,alt.feminism,alt..seduction..fast,alt..mindcontrol
as your post is cross-posted all over creation.
oss... Ross is a man who seems DRIVEN to PUSH
>the very LIMITS of our characters, and asking us to ASK questions about
>our selves that nobody asks.. He is willing to judge, and to discard any
>value or trait that does not allow you to ATTAIN your GOAL. and this
>FORCES YOU to deal with what works...not believe what someone said in
>some book.. or what has been stat. proven.
> Ross is a man like any man.. and apparently a very smart one..
>Easy question for you TIMID FRIGID SCHOOL GIRLS... if he is full of
>Shit.. and you think you might have something that might come close to
>even touching his thoughts, patterns, material.. I would like to hear
>them.. Yes!! you tell me how to do it your way.. and that whatever it is
>YOU are doing.. WORKS.. and gets everyone the results they ALL can count
>on, EVERYTIME.. No matter what it IS in dealing with an other human
>being!!
> Some day I will meet Ross and I will tell him what a Fucking
>unstoppable MONSTER he has unleashed, and How I have NOW.. not only able
>to sleep with any un/married women alive.. but total mastery over any
>situation that may be in my path.. And shake his hand.. and say
> "You are the MAN"..
>
> to other Narrow minded people.. he just sells dirty books.
>Ross I am in your debt.. Thanks MAN..
>A PROUD Graduate of the "SPEED SEDUCTION HOME STUDY COURSE"
>=- Ripper -=
> I AM I
>Ps.. I would be HONORED if you would put this letter in you newsletter
>Ross..
John Fereira
>Jeannie Dee (jea...@via.net) wrote:
>:
>: Any remarks or flames will be appreciated.
>
>Sometimes flames can turn into raging fires, that just want
>to devour everything in their path, burning a hot trail as
^^^^^^
>they consume the hardwood that feeds deep into the belly of
^^^^^^^ ^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>the fire. If someone were to flame you, I'm wondering if
>you'd have to put on your mittens to handle them, or if you
^^^^^^
>could stand up to the heat, your body glistening with sweat.
^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Guess what, Jeannie. You've just been speed seduced....
Cigarette?
--
John Fereira
fer...@isis.com
Isis Distributed Systems - Ithaca, NY
Cheezits
In article <4ie10q$j...@dfw-ixnews4.ix.netcom.com>, vin...@ix.netcom.com
(Vince LaPietra) writes:
[infomercial deleted]
> Some day I will meet Ross and I will tell him what a Fucking
>unstoppable MONSTER he has unleashed, and How I have NOW.. not only able
>to sleep with any un/married women alive..
BWAHAHAHAHA! If you believe that, you've hypnotized yourself.
>Ross I am in your debt.. Thanks MAN..
>
>A PROUD Graduate of the "SPEED SEDUCTION HOME STUDY COURSE"
UNaltered REPRODUCTION and DISSEMINATION of this IMPORTANT information is
ENCOURAGED.
Sue (or was it, Robert MacElwaine?)
Ross Jeffries
>
> Not that I am plugging his work, because I think that one should be
> "respectfull" in one's dealings with other people, but this stuff will
> work on ANYONE, and in contexts other than just the one he is applying
> it to.
Well, I don't consider what I am doing(or my students) to be
"disrespectful". I consider it bridge building-finding ways to cross over
a woman's temporary lack of interest, stalls, etc and enter her world...to
then bring her back into my world to experience something good for both of
us.
DAVID STUART
>spic...@bacardi.rmc.edu (Shawn Pickrell) wrote:
>>Ross Jeffries (sand...@via.net) wrote:
>>[speed seduction stuff clipped]
>>I have no doubt it might work, but would I really want a woman whose mind is
>>so malleable?
>Not that I am plugging his work, because I think that one should be
>"respectfull" in one's dealings with other people, but this stuff will
>work on ANYONE, and in contexts other than just the one he is applying
>it to.
>>In addition, I'm confused enough when I talk to people. Having to remember
>>this stuff might just overload my memory and cause a fatal system error or
>>a general protection fault.
>That is a comment on your perceived level of flexibility.
>Regards.... BM
Please repost....Newsletter #10
or E-mail me a copy.
David
Bill Kolstad
Dagfinn Reiersol
love him.
I was flamed by Phil even before I learned to recognize his name. And
for no good reason for doing as far as I could tell. Still, I learned
some wonderful things from the experience. I discovered how I could be
more generous and invented a new language pattern for the occasion.
There's no rhyme or reason to that, it was just magical and
miraculous. Thank you, Phil.
bigdog
>In article <4id7o5$c...@news1.io.org>, bmo...@io.org (Barry Moore) wrote:
>
>>
>> Not that I am plugging his work, because I think that one should be
>> "respectfull" in one's dealings with other people, but this stuff will
>> work on ANYONE, and in contexts other than just the one he is applying
>> it to.
>
> Well, I don't consider what I am doing(or my students) to be
>"disrespectful". I consider it bridge building-finding ways to cross over
>a woman's temporary lack of interest, stalls, etc and enter her world...to
>then bring her back into my world to experience something good for both of
>us.
>>
>>
>
>--
>Get Laid now!
>Ask me how!
>http://www.seduction.com for Free
>Get Laid Newsletters!
Hey, hey kids.....settle down. It's a tool, not an ethical issue.
Someone might be a dehumanizing low-life, but so what?
....does it work? What techniques work better? Have you postulated any
theoretical structure to this cluster of methods?
...and another thing....why in the hell does everyone insist on
cross-posting.
"You, go to your room....and you, go to your room.
"AND, you, there; march yourself across the street. Your mother will send
you to your room"
"I will go back to chair, and continue reading the newslett...uh,
er...paper."
big...@netins.net
http://www.netins.net/showcase/bigdog
The Dark Ages weren't really dark.
Dr. Jim Stevenson
and nonprofessional groups under a false name.
In article <3153bd6a...@news.netins.net>,
bigdog <big...@netins.net> wrote:
>On 19 Mar 1996 03:41:47 GMT, sand...@via.net (Ross Jeffries) wrote:
>
>>In article <4id7o5$c...@news1.io.org>, bmo...@io.org (Barry Moore) wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Not that I am plugging his work, because I think that one should be
>>> "respectfull" in one's dealings with other people, but this stuff will
>>> work on ANYONE, and in contexts other than just the one he is applying
>>> it to.
>>
>> Well, I don't consider what I am doing(or my students) to be
>>"disrespectful". I consider it bridge building-finding ways to cross over
>>a woman's temporary lack of interest, stalls, etc and enter her world...to
>>then bring her back into my world to experience something good for both of
>>us.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>--
>>Get Laid now!
>>Ask me how!
>>http://www.seduction.com for Free
>>Get Laid Newsletters!
>
>
Craig Hamilton
>It takes a "big dog" who must have a little dick, to crosspost to professional
>and nonprofessional groups under a false name.
I'm scatching my head trying to figure out which one of these is the
professional newsgroup. Hmm..... I'll put my money on soc.singles and maybe
alt.mindcontrol.