Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Newt, the anti-White candidate
0 views
Skip to first unread message
walt tonne
Feb 8, 2012, 8:14:44 AM2/8/12
to
On Feb 8, 6:12 am, walt tonne <tonnewalt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Posted on December 9, 2011 Newt Gingrich: The White Party’s
> Candidate?
> Henry Wolff, American Renaissance, December 9, 2011
>
> The former House Speaker has a long history of being anti-white. Newt
> Gingrich is the most anti-white candidate in the GOP presidential
> field. In fact, he may be one of the most anti-white Republicans ever.
> It is true that 81 percent of the jobs Rick Perry says he brought to
> Texas went to newly arrived immigrants (93 percent of whom were
> illegals), and he says that denying in-state tuition to illegals is
> heartless, but Newt Gingrich makes the him look like Tom Tancredo by
> comparison.
>
> In the 2010 midterm elections, nearly 90 percent of votes for
> Republicans were cast by whites. John McCain’s presidential support
> was of an identical complexion. Writing for The New York Times, Thomas
> Edsall, like Steve Sailer and Pat Buchanan before him, has dubbed the
> GOP “The White Party.” But rather than consolidating his proven white
> base and welcoming white working class voters who are increasingly
> defecting to the GOP, Newt Gingrich seems determined to dispossess
> that base while mollycoddling groups that will never vote for his
> party in significant numbers.
>
> Immigration
>
> On immigration, the former House Speaker is liberal. In a recent
> primary debate, Mr. Gingrich set up a restrictionist straw man so he
> could attack it with pure sentiment:
>
> If you’ve been here 25 years and you got three kids and two grandkids,
> you’ve been paying taxes and obeying the law, you belong to a local
> church, I don’t think we’re going to separate you from your family,
> uproot you forcefully and kick you out. I don’t see how the party that
> says it’s the party of the family is going to adopt an immigration
> policy which destroys families that have been here a quarter century.
>
> Of course, most mainstream restrictionists do not call for mass
> deportation, but for attrition through enforcement. Those who do favor
> deportation would happily send the kids and grandkids home with their
> family so as to keep it together. Mr. Gingrich went on to say he’s
> “prepared to take the heat for saying let’s be humane” toward illegal
> immigrants. Sadly, Mr. Gingrich did not take the “Perry Plunge“–a
> precipitous polling drop following maudlin immigration remarks. This
> is probably because other candidates in the field seem to be self-
> destructing and Herman Cain has finally “suspended” his campaign
>
> *article continue athttp://www.amren.org/American Renaissance
> Posted on December 9, 2011 Newt Gingrich: The White Party’s
> Candidate?
> Henry Wolff, American Renaissance, December 9, 2011
>
> The former House Speaker has a long history of being anti-white. Newt
> Gingrich is the most anti-white candidate in the GOP presidential
> field. In fact, he may be one of the most anti-white Republicans ever.
> It is true that 81 percent of the jobs Rick Perry says he brought to
> Texas went to newly arrived immigrants (93 percent of whom were
> illegals), and he says that denying in-state tuition to illegals is
> heartless, but Newt Gingrich makes the him look like Tom Tancredo by
> comparison.
>
> In the 2010 midterm elections, nearly 90 percent of votes for
> Republicans were cast by whites. John McCain’s presidential support
> was of an identical complexion. Writing for The New York Times, Thomas
> Edsall, like Steve Sailer and Pat Buchanan before him, has dubbed the
> GOP “The White Party.” But rather than consolidating his proven white
> base and welcoming white working class voters who are increasingly
> defecting to the GOP, Newt Gingrich seems determined to dispossess
> that base while mollycoddling groups that will never vote for his
> party in significant numbers.
>
> Immigration
>
> On immigration, the former House Speaker is liberal. In a recent
> primary debate, Mr. Gingrich set up a restrictionist straw man so he
> could attack it with pure sentiment:
>
> If you’ve been here 25 years and you got three kids and two grandkids,
> you’ve been paying taxes and obeying the law, you belong to a local
> church, I don’t think we’re going to separate you from your family,
> uproot you forcefully and kick you out. I don’t see how the party that
> says it’s the party of the family is going to adopt an immigration
> policy which destroys families that have been here a quarter century.
>
> Of course, most mainstream restrictionists do not call for mass
> deportation, but for attrition through enforcement. Those who do favor
> deportation would happily send the kids and grandkids home with their
> family so as to keep it together. Mr. Gingrich went on to say he’s
> “prepared to take the heat for saying let’s be humane” toward illegal
> immigrants. Sadly, Mr. Gingrich did not take the “Perry Plunge“–a
> precipitous polling drop following maudlin immigration remarks. This
> is probably because other candidates in the field seem to be self-
> destructing and Herman Cain has finally “suspended” his campaign
>
> *article continue athttp://www.amren.org/American Renaissance
0 new messages