Re: reiman posting cake farts?

[DGVREIMAN]

GOOGLE PROVES BROOKS LYING! - REBUTTAL

For all those that are ethical, believe in the truth, and is NOT a
member of a hate/smear and con gang like the Nigel N. Brooks
hate/smear and con gang, I sincerely wish you and yours a very Merry
Christmas, and further, sincerely wish you and yours a long, healthy
and prosperous life.

However, for the hate and con gang members, who regularly operate in a
tyrannical, cowardly and in a mob hate manner to smear and defame
veterans, I hereby provide the following rebuttal to their recent
fraud, false accusations and general cons - which have now been
provided to several different legal venues:

Please understand I am forced to post my rebuttals to the
hate/smear/con gang that operates under the tutelage and direction of
Mr. Nigel N. Brooks. As long as Nigel Brooks and gang's et al
hate/con and smear web sites and groups operate (which are clearly
designed and updated regularly to smear me with fraud, forgeries,
false accusations and general obloquy) I will be forced to defend
myself with the truth - as this and my past rebuttals clearly and
irrefutably provide.

Nigel Brooks Served

By this time Mr. Nigel N. Brooks and some of his gang members have
been contacted by the legal departments from Google and Lycos asking
them for sworn certification in respect to their rampant and flagrant
copyright violations on their "Get Doug" web sites and Google groups
(Federal court has ruled that "Fair Use" does not apply if a pattern
of spite and defamation is connected to the copyright violations).

Ergo, Mr. Brooks already knows the name of my law firm, the law
enforcement people that are already involved, and he has by now read
my law firm's letter to the US Attorney, and to various Federal law
enforcement entities. I am waiting for Brooks and his gang members
sworn statement replies that must be sent back to the Google and Lycos
agents, and of course I invite the hate/smear gang members to make
and issue statements to my lawyer, the US Attorney, law enforcement,
Google and Lycos about this issue. In fact, I and others *cannot
wait* to see their statements under oath!

Also note that after completing an extensive and comprehensive
investigation of the facts, including reviewing hundreds of posts from
the said hate gang, and my rebuttals, my lawyers have written to the
US Attorney and provided her with their conclusions and
recommendations, along with hundreds of exhibits supporting said
conclusions. Moreover, my law firm has further contacted several
Federal Investigators over some of the issues mentioned herein, and I
have, based upon advice of my counsel, personally contacted the FBI
in Portland, Or, and in Vancouver, Wa. I have been advised by the
FBI to file an official complaint with the FBI, and file a complaint
with the Oregon Police. I have also filed a complaint with the Clark
County Sheriff's office, and I am preparing other complaints for other
states based upon the conclusions of my law firm and their letter to
the US Attorney.

I have (with legal assistance) also rewritten my John Doe lawsuit and
it is ready to go as soon as Nigel N. Brooks (and/or some of his key
gang members) respond under an oath to the official legal complaints
and to the official complaints filed with Google and Lycos.

It appears, one way or another, this issue is going to the courts.

(Probably several courts considering I have been advised to file
several complaints in several different states). (If Mr. Brooks
refuses to provide you with any of the information mentioned above,
then email me directly at legal...@comcast.net with your request,
and once your email and real name have been verified, then I will
provide all information mentioned above. Please understand that
anything you say in statements in regards to these issues can and
will be used against you in a court of law). Note further that you
will retain a copy of your email, so any whines and excuses from Nigel
Brooks or members of his smear gang to NOT ask me directly to reveal
the information I am offering herein are nothing more than a
desperate attempt to keep you in the dark about the truth of this
issue. Of course they do NOT WANT you to contact me and read my law
firm's letters, for doing so would provide evidence they are the liars
and frauds I know them to be.

If you believe my actions are Draconian, then I must ask what would
you do if someone lied and posted that you were a pedophile, dealt in
child porno, broke into your medical records and posted some of them
on USENET, used fraud and forged FBI reports to defame you, lied
profusely about your military service (such as claiming I was never in
combat) and posted thousands of lies stating that I claimed I received
a Purple Heart medal, which of course I never said? Not to mention
the filing of false criminal charges against you and experiencing the
direction, tutelage and incitement from Nigel N. Brooks to his
smear/hate and con gang members to continue with such fraud and abuse
of process with similar acts?

I suspect anyone that was subjected to such fraud and con man false
accusations for as long as I have would be forced to do the same as I
have, and will. And you can bet I have just started to defend myself.
(If Nigel Brooks or any of his gang members deny any of the statements
I have provided herein, then once again, please email me directly,
confirm your identity, and I will refer you to the letter from my law
firm to the US Attorney and to various Federal Investigators).

Smear Merchant Disclaimer

I have better things to do than rebut the fraud and false accusations
made by members of the Nigel Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
However, unlike the gang's other smear victims, I will defend myself
from the gang's obloquy and fraud in each case.

You would think these pathetic souls and cowards would find
something to do other than spread their fraud, hate and smears about
people they have targeted for their obloquy, but alas, it appears to
me their malicious bullying and perpetual hate and frauds have become
their "pathetic life."

I believe Nigel N. Brooks and some of his hate/smear/con gang members
are nothing more than pathetic cowards and hate mongers.

Nigel Brooks Hiding From Independent Legal Analysis

I have repeatedly offered Nigel N. Brooks and his hate/smear/con gang
members the opportunity to take their hate, false accusations and
fraud to (1) the American Association of Arbitrators, loser pays, and
if that independent legal entity frightened them I even offered them
the opportunity to (2) pick any University they choose (that has a
law school) and they can submit their rants and fraud to that
University, and I will provide my rebuttals, and if the University
says I am lying I pay for everything, but if the University says the
con men are lying, THEY pay for the independent analysis.

Once again the cowards that compose the Nigel N. Brooks hate/smear and
con gang pissed their panties and ran for cover in respect to my
offers of an independent legal analysis of their outrageous, unethical
and malicious false accusations.

I also offered Nigel N. Brooks an opportunity to even NAME a single
document he claims exists in those military records he received via
his FOIA request about me that proves ANY of Nigel Brooks or any of
his hate gang's smears or statements they have posted about me . . .
once again we see Nigel N. Brooks and his smear gang hide, cower, and
pee their panties over this simple means to prove to the readers the
volumes of cons and fraud Nigel Brooks and his smear gang have been
posting about me and others on this forum.

You must always remember that hate mongers and con men are true
cowards - and that is one reason why I have been forced to bring this
issue into a public legal arena.

Web Sites for Hate and Profit

Note that Nigel Brooks and some of his hate/smear/con gang members
maintain web sites and a Google Newsgroup designed specifically to
defame me with fraud, serial lying, outright con man fraud, and of
course libel, which forces me to rebut their fraud with these truthful
rebuttals. Also note that Nigel Brooks and/or members of his hate
gang make a profit and/or gain value from selling advertising on
those said hate and fraud sites.

Once again, I have offered Nigel Brooks dozens of times (and/or any
of his con/hate/smear gang members) the opportunity to take their
fraud and false accusations to the American Association of
Arbitrators, or to any legal department of any University they select,
and if either of those entities agrees with Nigel Brooks in respect to
his accusations about me, I will pay for their services. HOWEVER, if
those legal experts agree that my rebuttals are correct and accurate,
then Nigel Brooks and/or his smear/hate/con gang members pay for the
independent legal analysis.

Nigel Brooks and his gang members run, duck, hide, cower, piss their
panties, and snivel pathetic excuse after pathetic excuse to hide from
and refuse my hundreds of offers to take this issue to independent
legal experts . . . and the reason they hide from such independent
analysis is obvious to me - they know they are lying.

Disclaimer Continues

Please be advised further this article (the same as all of my past
articles and exchanges with posters) represents an editorial on
contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in this article
represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical fact, nor is
about, directed toward or against any particular person - other than
those specifically mentioned herein. This article is being posted for
entertainment purposes only. If any person finds this post personally
annoying, abusive, offensive, defaming or otherwise disturbing,
please notify me of your specific reasons for annoyance via email at
legal...@comcast.net.

If we find your detailed objections reasonable (considering the
"reasonable person" doctrine and case law) we will then remove this
post, or the offending passages contained therein, from the Google
archive, publicly apologize and retract.

My intent is to entertain, and to present articles to USENET readers
prior to publication to determine interest, and not to annoy, abuse,
humiliate, or in any way cause anyone emotional harm by posting on
USENET or elsewhere. Please also note that defending myself from
harassment and obloquy with rebuttal posts has been deemed a "lawful
and legitimate" publication by my legal counsel. If I am not attacked,
libeled, defamed or harassed, or my copyrighted articles not
interrupted nor infringed upon, I clearly do not have a reason to
respond with a rebuttal.

Please also note that I intend to notify any and all ISP's and web
hosts of any annoying or calumnious post, web site or other similar
entity about me after I give the offender an opportunity to retract,
apologize and remove said post from the Google archive.

SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER TWO: Considering the typical ridiculous,
absurd and obviously false claims about my military service that
originates from the crackpot smear and con gang that operates on
alt.war.Vietnam, I also hereby certify and attest this article is NOT
a secret coded message that only gang members can decode with their
secret Federal Agent/Sp4 draftee/former Junior Reserve Officer/ midget
decoder and mind reading rings.
This means the Brownie crackpots' inevitable accusations and howls
that this article is really me claiming in a special soothsaying code
(a code only crackpots et al smear gang can only read of course which
involves their typical claim the American Heritage Dictionary's
definition's of simple terms, such as "we" "estimated" "involved"
"retired from" and "not representing any biographical claim" are all
incorrect, and only their "special interpretations of the English
language can apply to all English terms I use, and of course the
gang's
standard nonsensical mind reading and soothsaying claims that (1) I
was a CIA cross border assassin that sniper killed Ho Chi Minh,
HOORAH - (2) that I personally killed 1803 enemy soldiers in Vietnam
and then feasted on their bodies (burp) (3) that I was a secret member
of the Mi Lai massacre, (let God sort them out) that I hunted down and
murdered unarmed Priests (take that choir boy) (4) that I was trained
by the Martian Army on Mars, and I have green blood, and retractable
fangs (slurp), (5) that the movie "Rambo" was copied after my deeds in
Vietnam and I still live in caves in the northwest (6) and best of
all, I went to the Carlisle War College to study WWII tactics even
before I was born!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHHA.

Needless to say, the smear gang misrepresentations of my past posts
are of course, not true.

I have posted dozens of times on USENET that I will not post
autobiographical facts about my life on USENET in any detail. Only a
quip now and then. And, if anyone wants to know the true facts, or a
clarification of any quip, or more information and details about an
issue which are clearly missing in my quips they must first contact
me via email, identify themselves, and then I will determine if I want
to exchange such personal information with them.

Although the above is my standing offer, I should mention that NOT ONE
member of the gang has ever contacted me directly over any one of my
posts. It is clear the gang does not want to know about obvious
typos, errors, and occasional ambiguities, nor clarifications, nor
corrections, nor do they even want verification whether I was the
actual author of the post in question. (Note although the above
statement is as clear as it can be - some smear merchants have
deliberately *averted their eyes* from this key disclaimer paragraph
for years - and ridiculously attempted to claim did not include all
past, present and future posts in this disclaimer - which of course
clearly is a lie. But for their fraudulent benefit - I *again*
reiterate this disclaimer applies to all of my posts, exchanges and
USENET writings, past, present and future. I further reserve the
right to use any type of fiction, nonfiction, hyperbole,
autobiographical fiction, embellishments and quips in my writings as I
see fit, whenever I wish, and I will not be censored by smear/hate and
con gangs).

As experts on Investigations and the US Military have noted, the gang
leaders and their members clearly want to avoid the truth whenever it
contradicts their contrived and conspired defaming parsing and
fraudulent misrepresentations and distortions of what I have written
in the past, or contradicts their lies and fraud in respect to what is
and is not truly contained in my military records, and of course,
their fraudulent use of USENET posts they know others have written to
use to smear me, defame me, hold me up to public ridicule, stalk me,
and otherwise further their years' long demonizing and vilification
campaign they have been regularly waging against me.

In short, the gang does not want to know the truth, and they are
desperate to stop me from defending myself as they know my truthful
rebuttals, which they cannot defend as they know what I am posting is
true, reveal them for what they really are.

The gang's lies and fraud border on the pathological, and include the
gang' preposterous and goofy fraud that (7) a Purple Heart VA card is
the same as a Purple Heart Medal (I have posted on USENET dozens of
times I did not receive a Purple Heart Medal) (8) Nor that removing
hundreds of typos, errors, misstatements made by typists and I found
so far in about thirty-five THOUSAND extemporaneous posts under
accounts I used, and then replacing the errors with the true intended
context and meaning by the author is somehow "sinister" and the
original discarded post was the correct intended post and the
corrected version is false! (Giggle).
Such glaring preposterous crackpot et al smear and fraud gang claims
about me are, as usual, blatantly false and equally ridiculous. (Ask
the gang leaders for proof of their claims the next time they make
such ludicrous claims and watch them scurry for their rocks or produce
their own forgeries, or perhaps typos, errors and such that have long
been detected and discarded in my waste basket they have dug out of
that trash).

And regardless of forgeries and discarded posts found in my waste
basket that were thrown there because of an error or typist
misstatement by one of our typist's, I have posted about two dozen
times in the past that my time in South America was spent (other than
an assignment and short visit to Southern Command after I left
Vietnam) exclusively as a Civilian working for Montana Western Oil and
Gas or PCA, which evidence proving such was scanned and posted years
ago.
Also, in response to the smear gang's et al repeated and convenient
outright lie and fraud that I never said that others were using the
same accounts to post on USENET as I did until the smear gang leaders
started their fraud, con and smear campaign against me and thereby
forced me to post on this newsgroup to defend myself, please see the
following proof that of course the gang leaders et al have been caught
lying again:

http://tinyurl.com/6d4aay TYPISTS' GALORE POST proves there were about
71 previous posts prior to the gang's glaring lie that I never
mentioned others posting under the same accounts I used until after
the gang leaders started to use a few typos, errors and post fragments
written by many different people, years apart, never written on any
military forum, deceptively spliced together with forged words added
into or subtracted from the hodgepodge of different context post
fragments so as to fraudulently alter their meaning or context.

http://tinyurl.com/7kfaqz Experts on Smear Gangs reveal what the
Nigel Brooks con/hate and smear gang is all about.

http://tinyurl.com/bu3dwb Those that Label Others KOOKS suffer a
psychosis named EID say psychologists - and that so-called "Kook"
votes never occur outside of the smear gang.

http://tinyurl.com/5o59lr Nigel Brooks' lies about receiving medals
he never received, and lies about serving in war campaigns and in
reactionary forces long after he had already left active duty.

http://tinyurl.com/bxrf2b US Government Web Site and independent
Experts on the US Military confirm Nigel Brooks and many of his
smear/hate and con gang lied about my military service and my military
records. (This read is important as the gang is claiming that my
military records disproved or prove various things they have
fraudulently claimed about me. However, in truth we find those gang
accusations and claims to be nothing more than outright cons and
fraud. Brooks and Rau and other gang members have been lying about
the contents of my records for years. Above represents clear and
irrefutable proof of their fraud and false accusations.

http://tinyurl.com/ddogy4 Proof of just a few of Nigel Brooks
outright forgeries which he has used to fraudulently defame and smear
me - yes *forgeries* - fraud and deception from Nigel Brooks running
rampant.

http://tinyurl.com/otvaph

Purple Heart Defamation from the gang revealed and rebutted.
Irrefutable proof the gang has been using outright fraud, defamation
and forgeries to smear and defame in respect to this issue.

http://tinyurl.com/pomzo7 05/21/09
YET ANOTHER Investigator confirms the smear/hate gang lied about
Purple Heart medal claims. Also, all those times I said I did not
have a PH Medal, which the gang has been maliciously hiding.

Http://tinyurl.com/q6pk56 The smear/hate gang's fraudulent
accusation "I said I was a Hero" proved the fraud and lie it is: In
fact - I said the *exact opposite* as these several past posts clearly
prove. Once again the gang has been exposed lying about something
they have been forging and lying about for years. Hate and smear
gangs always attempt to paint their smear victims in a false and
defaming light - this is clearly the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and con
gang's purpose and mantra.

Here Nigel Brooks admits that he is not claiming I claimed I had a
purple heart medal - which contradicts not only Nigel Brooks
subsequent false accusations numbering in the hundreds, but including
his gang's fraud on this issue, it also contradicts similar fraud and
false accusations numbering in the *thousands!*

I said as the following URL clearly proves:

1http://tinyurl.com/y3yvb9 In this post I make it clear that I
referenced a Purple Heart Card and not a Purple Heart Medal - and the
difference between the two.

Nigel Brooks said:
2http://tinyurl.com/y3yvb9
In the above URL, Mr. Brooks also provided the following very clear
statements about this issue:

"He's doing the same now - by trying to insert the word "medal" into
the argument. Well no-one is accusing him of claiming to have had a
"Purple Heart Medal" - but the record shows he has claimed to have had
a Purple Heart **(VA service connected ID card)** and that he
received it in a real war. " (Emphasis added).

Obviously, Nigel Brooks above agreed and confirmed that I never said I
had a purple heart medal. Strange Nigel and his gang would
conveniently "forget" Nigel's conclusion about this issue after I
started proving they had lied about this issue all along - as the
above posts clearly prove?

Gang Preposterously Claims "Fiction" is "Lying."

When Brooks read my "shoot around little girl" or "shoot little girl"
post (for about the tenth time and counting) he said the following:

http://tinyurl.com/q9r9to May 22, 2009

"I would hazard a guess that the story is complete bullshit and that
Reiman never shot a 4 or 5 year old Vietnamese girl, otherwise
such an admission made in a public forum is astounding.

>>>> Nigel Brooks "

Then *after* I responded to Brooks (see URL above) and told him that
of course it was pure fiction just like my disclaimer states hundreds
of times. Brooks then reversed himself and wrote:
" he was in fact claiming that whilst he was in Vietnam he was >
forced to shoot a 4 or 5 year old Vietnamese child, who he claims was
attempting to kill him or his compatriots with an explosive device
concealed in a package of cigarettes.
>
> Now that is the logical interpretation of his post. In that post he
> says
> nothing about it being a fictional account or a debating method. The
> post
> stands by itself."

Nigel Brooks"

Fiction and Sarcasm - Brooks and gang style.

I must conclude (based upon the above statements from Nigel Brooks
that all posts "stand by themselves") that Nigel Brooks is
proclaiming and confirming that all the times he claimed he was using
fiction or sarcasm in his posts he was lying because he did not
specifically state he was using fiction or sarcasm in such posts. If
*all* posts stand as written like Nigel Brooks claims, and can never
be explained nor the true intent and context provided by the author
when asked, then I must assume the same rules apply to all posts
published by Nigel Brooks and his gang.

See how completely idiotic Nigel Brooks claims about my posts really
are?

We all know, the WORLD knows, that when Fiction is used in any article
or prose it is NEVER identified as Fiction! Mark Twain even said
that Fiction has to be more believable than nonfiction or it loses its
effectiveness! According to the fantastic howls of Nigel Brooks,
each time an author uses Fiction or Sarcasm to embellish or add
interest to a story, he must immediately inform the reader in that
same article he is using Fiction or Sarcasm! This fantastic claim by
Nigel Brooks is about the most ridiculous, idiotic statement I have
ever heard in respect to an author's use of Fiction and Sarcasm, and
it directly contradicts ALL authors, prose instruction, and journalism
101 in every University in the World!

So once again we have another Nigel Brooks arrogant first, now he is
claiming he knows more about writing Fiction than Mark Twain and all
Universities in the world!

I cannot decide if Nigel Brooks is arrogantly stupid, or just
arrogant? Or perhaps both? I will leave that decision up to the
readers.

http://tinyurl.com/madq65 In this post I point out that I have told
Nigel Brooks and his hate/con smear gang members *more than a thousand
times* (evidenced by Google archives) that I *DO NOT* post
autobiographical statements of fact on USENET - and if someone wants
to know whether what I post is Fiction, Non-Fiction, or whatever, they
*must contact me* and ask for more details.

I also posted that I DO NOT post autobiographical statements of facts
about myself on USENET as far back as 2001, and repeated that general
disclaimer statement in early 2003. Nigel Brooks and his smear/hate
con gang did not start their smear campaign against me until 2005,
*and Nigel Brooks and his gang even referenced and mentioned the post
in 2003 when I said I do not post autobiographical facts about me on
USENET - so they *knew* all along they were lying about the context
and meaning of quips they removed from my posts.

When an Author tells you MORE THAN A THOUSAND TIMES he is NOT posting
exclusively nonfiction on USENET, you would think that statement by
the author would resonate into even the pea brains of con men, smear
merchants and hate group leaders. Which of course it did as they
acknowledged this statement (Tom Rau whined and confirmed he read my
disclaimer more than 270 times) - but this fact had to be hidden by
such people so they could further their obviously fraudulent smear and
con defamation campaigns.

SELF ADMITTED AND SELF ACCLAIMED "TROLLS" OPERATE NIGEL BROOKS SMEAR
GANG'S MOST UNETHICAL FRAUD, SERIAL LYING AND CON MAN FALSE
ACCUSATIONS!

Many of the most vociferous and deceptive Nigel Brooks' key smear
gang members self-describe themselves as "Trolls."

These self-acclaimed and self-described *Trolls* have posted
hundreds of defaming statements and libel about me under those very
revealing Troll self-descriptions. (See alt.war.vietnam troll
section - you will find ALL of the self-described Trolls are connected
to Nigel Brooks and his gang's defamation and smear campaigns).

As just one example, here is the latest FBI forgery direct from a
Nigel Brooks smear/hate gang member that self-describes himself as a
"Troll." Note the gang member is again fraudulently using the name
of the FBI to smear and defame - which as we all know is a criminal
act.

It is obvious these Nigel Brooks smear/hate gang members will resort
to and use criminal acts to further the gang's smear and vilification
campaigns:

"Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.alt.net
From: Troll #351 <Leon...@sistine.va>
Newsgroups:
alt.war.vietnam,alt.politics,alt.news-media,alt.military,alt.military.retired,alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: That Second FBI Phone Transcript betwixt Mr.Doug Grant-tm
and the FBI
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:55:46 -0700"

Considering the self-description of these gang members as "Trolls" and
their propensity to use criminal acts (using the name of the FBI for
nefarious purposes is a criminal act - Federal and Brooks knows it)
to defame Nigel Brook's targeted hate/smear victim, can anyone out
there actually believe anything Nigel Brooks or any of his gang
members say about anyone?

If you do then you are admitting that you are de facto stating that
you believe people that are *telling you up front they are liars and
con men!* BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Question:

If you actually believe someone that is telling you up front that he
is lying to you, what would best describe you: (1) a moron (2) a
drooling moron (3) a member of the Nigel Brooks smear and con gang -
or perhaps all three?

Lawyers Speak "again"

All should know and be hereby informed that hate messages of any kind,
serial lying, fraud, libel, (which of course includes intentional and
malicious defamation and libel by omitting key facts) and other
publications of any kind will be recorded and used against the
perpetrator in a legal action. This is especially true for those
owners and participants in smear/hate web sites and hate newsgroups
which are used to further and facilitate hate and smear campaigns
against individuals.

End Disclaimer - Rebuttal Begins below:

******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************

GOOGLE PROVES NIGEL BROOKS IS LYING

Issue Background:

In a desperate attempt to CHA due to his and his gang's outrageous
fraud they posted about me which my public military records proved
completely false and fraudulent, Nigel Brooks and some of his gang
members dug through my electronic waste basket and found a discarded
post they then resurrected on the Google Archives (one member of the
Nigel Brooks gang claims he is a "computer consultant" and apparently
wrote malicious searches to find anything he could to use to defame
and smear me, including rummaging through my electronic waste
basket!).

Although the post in question ( a reply to Chip dated Feb 2003) was
clearly NOT about Purple Heart medals (as the last sentence clearly
proves) after a SDS member associate gang member connected to the
Nigel Brooks gang member, the SteveL anonymous cyberstalker (who
denies he is Steve Leyland) tried to insinuate otherwise, yet was
*immediately* told his insinuation was a "complete distortion" of the
true context of the post, I decided to remove the post from the
Google archive to immediately remedy any question about the true
context of the post.

(Note that I had already posted several times that I DID NOT have a
purple heart medal - and further confirmed that fact several times
subsequently, but I still thought that removing the post would
immediately remedy any question from those that were never in the
military and therefore did not understand the last sentence of the
reply - which of course is the key to the intended context).

After Nigel Brooks launched his hate/smear and con smear campaign
against me in March 2005 (ongoing to this day with new fraud additions
to his web sites) Nigel Brooks and some of his hate/smear/con gang
members then resurrected this *long removed and long remedied* post
from my electronic waste basket, and then fraudulently claimed (1)
that Google had replaced it back on their archives due to its
contents, and also fraudulently claimed (2) I did not remove the post
until 2006.

The false 2006 removal fraudulent claim by Nigel Brooks and some of
his con group was directly connected to their additional outright
fraud and con that the post was about medals, and they were trying to
con and lie and sell their outright fraud and con that I removed the
post due to the Stolen Valor Act which of course was promulgated in
2006.

The hate mongers, crackpots and con men that compose the Nigel Brooks
hate/con/smear gang knew they could never convince rational readers
that I intended to say something if I had in fact removed it from the
Google archives. No one is stupid enough to believe that someone
intended to say or convey something if they removed it from the
archives for the purpose of disambiguation or correction! Even hate
mongers know no one rational is stupid enough to believe such tripe -
so they had to dream up some con as a reason for me to remove the
ost - which they howled and fraudulently claimed was due to the
Stolen Valor Act - which was not even thought of until long after I
had removed this post, as Google as confirmed.

Of course, as Google has confirmed, this post was *removed months
before the Stolen Valor Act was even proposed - not to mention
enacted!* Obviously, if I had intended to convey what the con men are
claiming *I would not have removed the post from the Google archives
in the first place!*

Yet Another Third Independent Party Proves Nigel Brooks is Lying

Nigel Brooks and some of his gang member's outright fraud and cons
have been exposed by an independent third party ONCE AGAIN! How many
times has Nigel Brooks been caught in mid con and fraud? We are
compiling a list of his cons and fraud for an imminent legal action,
and you will not believe the amount of times this con man has been
caught posting outright fraud. His fraud and outrageously deliberate
and malicious false accusations are amazing! I suspect, but cannot
prove, that perhaps Nigel N. Brooks is one of the most egregious
hate/smear and con gang leaders that uses the Internet to spread his
false accusations and fraud against those he has targeted for such
attacks.

Nigel N. Brooks maliciously "frames" much of what I have said in the
past in the most false and defaming context he can dream up - and that
fact has been noted by every legal mind I have asked to review his
wild and outrageous false accusations about me.

What a Tangled Web of Deceit the Hate Gang Members have Spun for
Themselves

Nigel Brooks and his con men had to claim I did not remove the Chip
reply post until 2006 to add credibility to their first con that the
post was about medals and not about its obvious true context, which
was VA issued purple heart ID cards, which were issued at the time of
the post. (Note the true context of this post was verified during a
conversation with Chip within about 90 days of the post that Nigel
Brooks and his hate/smear/con gang are trying to distort and con the
readers into fraudulently believing their con the post was about
medals).

Of course, Nigel Brooks and his hate/smear/con gang have been caught
lying and falsely accusing red handed on ALL issues about this long
removed post:

Although it is clear to all military experts and legal experts that I
have submitted all facts about this issue that the true intent and
context of the post were NOT about medals, the Nigel Brooks
smear/hate/and con gang, even after being told the correct context
several times, and even after having the non-medal context confirmed
by independent military experts with 30 years of military service,
has continued with their false and fraudulent accusations about this
issue on a regular basis, including on their hate for profit smear and
con gang web sites and gang operated forums -which also make money
from selling advertising based upon their outright fraud, false
accusations, libel, and various other forms of false light defamation
and outright cons and deceptions.

Apparently, based on the fraudulent and false content of the gang's
web sites, and the advertising that are being sold on those sites,
Nigel Brooks has discovered a new con game - "internet defamation and
fraud for profit."

Moreover, regardless of the dozens of times I posted *I DID NOT* have
a purple heart medal, and the dozens of times that Nigel Brooks, Tom
Rau and his gang acknowledged that fact, once the SteveL smear
merchant and anonymous cyberstalker (who denies his real name is Steve
Leyland) managed to dig the old discarded post out of my electronic
waste basket (Google did not replace it and they have confirmed that
fact in writing) the con men started to present this "long discarded,
corrected and remedied" post out of context while ignoring the dozens
of other posts, both prior and subsequent, that stated I did not have
nor was interested in any Purple Heart Medal, and further this gang
maliciously ignored I and the typist that wrote the post stated
succinctly dozens of times the post in question was about Purple
Heart VA ID Cards.

Con Men Deliberately and Maliciously Snooping in my Waste Basket to
Produce More Fraud and False Smears

The mere fact these hate/smear merchants dug around in my electronic
waste basket to try and find discarded and long corrected items they
could then fraudulently misrepresent to lie and con about me alone
should give the readers some insight as to the unethical and
fraudulent tactics the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and con gang use
against their targeted smear victims.

1. Google has replied to me as evidenced below that contrary to Nigel
Brooks fraudulent claims (see below); (1) Google DID NOT replace the
reply to Chip post in question, and Google's legal department has
further confirmed that it NEVER reads posts and decides which posts
should remain or be placed on their archives or not.

This statement by the Google legal department of course directly
contradicts what Nigel Brooks (and some of his gang members) have
repeatedly posted about this issue (see below for evidence of their
posts and what they said), and of course also proves irrefutably
that Nigel Brooks and some of his hate/smear/con gang members have
been conning and lying to the readers about this issue for years!

2. Google has also confirmed in writing the post in question (the
reply to Chip in Feb 2003) was NOT removed in 2006, and was in fact
removed several months before, (long before any Stolen Valor law was
even thought of) and was removed due to the reason I provided Google,
which was "the post context was about purple heart VA ID cards." The
date of removal of this post (certified in writing by Google) was
also LONG BEFORE Nigel Brooks or any of his gang members ever said a
word about it. Once again, Nigel Brooks and his hate gang have been
caught in a mid con.

3. Google's statement about the date of removal for this post proves
irrefutably that Nigel Brooks and some of his hate/con/smear gang
members fraudulently, maliciously and conspiratorially, worked
together to falsely accuse me of a crime, and to imply and
fraudulently misrepresent this entire issue for the malicious purpose
of false light and fraudulent criminal accusations - all designed to
cast me and my military service in a false and defaming light - for
the obvious purpose to harm my reputation and profession, and to harm
me emotionally.

4. So far, (and counting) Nigel Brooks and some of his hate/smear and
con gang members have perpetrated the following similar nefarious and
overt acts against me:

a. After posting hundreds of false light, fraudulent and defaming
posts about me on USENET, and after someone else outed this key gang
member's real name, and after he said he was "visiting Muslim Mosques
about me" this gang member crossed state lines and filed a completely
fraudulent, bogus false cyberstalking charge against me with my local
DA.

After the Clark County Sheriff's deputy investigated the bogus
charges, and my lawyer also investigated same, and after we reviewed
the false evidence this hate gang member planted with that said
department to facilitate his fraudulent charges, and after the
Sheriff's
Deputy reported back to the DA, the DA completely threw out,
dismissed and refused to prosecute this gang member's obviously false
and malicious charges. It was and is apparent to me that this gang
member had previously conspired with several other Nigel Brooks hate
gang members to file bogus criminal charges against me because
several of them joined him when he boasted about filing his false
charges on USENET - for the obvious purpose of malicious harassment,
defamation, false light fraud, and to cause me emotional harm.

B. After the gang's fraudulent and false charges were thrown out by
the DA (after a thorough investigation by the Clark country Sheriff's
department), then after Mr. Nigel Brooks in his desperation to stop my
rebuttals to his cons and fraud about me, called for and directed his
hate gang to file fraudulent charges against me with the Veteran's
Administration, this same gang member then mysteriously "volunteered"
to work for the VA in the same VA office that maintained and
controlled my medical records.

What this Nigel Brooks key gang member did not know was because of a
previous complaint to the VA about Mr. Thomas Rau posting some of my
private medical information on USENET, a "trap" had been placed on my
records by a Federal Investigator hoping to catch the perpetrator that
had been accessing my private VA Medical Files.

After the Nigel Brooks hate gang member posted some of my private
medical information on USENET, and provided same to third parties,
which they then trafficked to various other third parties, and this
process was made known to me, I then contacted the VA and asked them
if the person I knew as this gang member had, WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION
accessed my private VA Medical files. I was informed by the Federal
VA Investigator (in writing - a copy furnished the US Attorney and is
available for review if you email me) that in fact this person had,
without authorization nor approval by the VA, accessed my VA medical
records NOT LESS THAN THREE TIMES!

After a thorough investigation by the Federal Investigator, the Nigel
Brooks hate gang member was fired from the Veterans Administration,
and I was informed (in writing) by the VA Headquarters that he will
not be allowed to work for, on in any way access any VA Medical files
ever again. (If you want to know the name of the gang member ask
Nigel Brooks or email me as his name is stated in my lawyer's letter
to the US Attorney).

I asked the VA investigator if this gang members' propensity to
steal, traffic in and sabotage medical records should be provided to
the entire medical community in this gang member's area, and the VA
investigator informed me that would be something I would need to do
through other legal channels -although he recommended I do take
further action if the gang member continued with this harassment and
invasions, which of course, he and other gang members have done.

When Mr. Nigel Brooks provides you with the information he should have
received from Google or Lycos by now, you also will review several
statements to law enforcement (which Nigel Brooks and gang claim were
never contacted) from my lawyers.

Moreover, I urge all that wish to do so to contact these officials and
be sure to "tell them your side of the story" as I cannot wait to see
what some of these gang members say to Federal Investigators
(considering it is a crime to lie to them). In fact I and my lawyers
cannot wait to read statements from this hate gang - and it is time to
bring such statements under oath.

Real Vets Beware of Hate/Smear/Con Gangs

I find it absolutely amazing that any real Veteran would ever be
associated with Nigel Brooks or any of his gang members if they
actually believe in our troops and wish to support them. No wonder
the key member of the Nigel Brooks gang that has attacked our troops
fighting in Iraq by calling them "murderers" - is NOT a Veteran, yet
sleazes into Veteran's groups for the obvious purpose to smear and
defame *real* veterans. It is clear to me this hate gang's hidden
objective is to defame and discredit real veterans with lies, false
accusations and general fraud. (One gang member even recently
defamed the entire US Marine Corps, and he also said all NCO's were
"incompetent and ineffective" or words to that effect - not to mention
denied any POW's were ever held back by the Vietnamese, and further
claimed all that suffered from Agent Orange diabetes were "obese
slugs." Obviously, the true agenda of this hate gang is to attack
Veterans.

This post is a rebuttal to the Gang's recent (November 2009) USENET
fraud about this issue, both stated and implied:

http://tinyurl.com/cyj896 The Purple Heart Rebuttal post that
irrefutably proves Nigel Brooks and his gang have been lying about
this issue for years.

When I revealed that a Nigel Brooks gang member had dug the old
discarded post out of my waste basket and was using a known discarded
post as a means to con the readers and defame me, Brooks had to find a
con and fraud to counter the image of him and his con men digging
around in waste baskets for known discarded errors as a means to
maliciously and fraudulently defame and smear me. Soooooo - what did
con man Nigel Brooks do? He conned and lied about the source of this
discarded post of course.

Nigel Brooks posted that GOOGLE *decided* to replace my discarded post
back on its archives after it read the post and wanted to preserve it
for historical purposes - among other outright cons, frauds and false
statements about Google's involvement in the Nigel Brooks con game and
smear fraud tactics. (See below for evidence of Nigel N. Brooks
fraudulent statements in this regard).

So I wrote Google, and told them what Nigel Brooks had said, provided
Google with the evidence below in respect to what Nigel Brooks said
about Google's participation. Google has finally replied in part, and
here is what Google said about Nigel Brooks statements:

----- Original Message -----
From: <he...@google.com>
To: <dgvr...@comcast.net>
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: [#542092740] Your mailed complaint

> Hi Doug,
>
> Firstly, in regards to your requests based on defamation, please
> note that while we're sympathetic to your request... Google is a
> provider of information, not a mediator. We make no claims about
> the content of the many posts in our archive. We suggest addressing
> your concern directly to the author of the post in question.
>
> We are not equipped to assess the truth or falsity of statements
> posted to our site by third parties.

>If you choose to pursue legal action against this
>author, we are prepared to abide by any orders involving the
postings in
>question.
>
> In regards to your claims of copyright infringement, we ask that you
> visit the following page for instructions on how to file an
> appropriate
> DMCA complaint for Groups:
> http://www.google.com/groups_dmca.html
>
> If you have questions in obtaining such information, please feel
> free to contact legal-...@google.com.
>
>
> Regards,
> The Google Team
>
>

Note that I have contacted the Google legal department since several
times. They have recently verified that the post in question (the
Chip reply Feb 2003) was removed by me months before the year 2006.
(I have Google's written certification of removal). I am still
waiting for their reply to me once Nigel N. Brooks provides them with
his sworn certifications. Which of course will produce immediate
further legal action.

Copyright Violations

Note that I have already filed a complaint with the Google and Lycos
copyright agent in respect to the Google and Lycos Serb Bog group's
flagrant copyright violations. They will then notify Nigel Brooks
(should have done so by now) and ask him to certify under oath that he
is not violating my copyrights. If he completes such certifications,
then according to my lawyers he will be sued within two weeks of the
date we received such sworn certification. Or, if Brooks claims he is
violating my copyrights but has a right to do so under any provision
of the Copyright Act (such as "fair use"), my lawyers have found
several case law rulings from Federal Judges that state "fair use"
does not apply if the copyright violation is being used for spite,
harassment or defamation. (Not to mention to profit from shared
advertising fees) which is clearly the case in respect to the posting
history of Nigel Brooks and some of his gang members in my respect.
So if Brooks responds, he and others that have violated my copyrights
will be sued within two weeks from the date we receive such
certifications.

Further, note my copyrights are *registered copyrights!* What that
means is that I do not need to prove any damages for copyright
violations to obtain a monetary judgement against the infringers. For
*registered copyrights* damages are presumed and statutory, need not
be proved, and are awarded by the Judge along with restraining orders.
So at least I know I will receive my legal fees back when the suit is
filed. (I expect Brooks and his gang to actually lie under oath, and
then of course other complaints will be then filed when they do).

Also note that when Google provides Nigel Brooks with my copyright
complaint and asks Brooks for his certification, (which should have
already occurred or will occur soon) he will also be provided a copy
of my lawyer's letter to the US Attorney General, and to other law
enforcement and to other Federal Investigators.

I hereby urge Brooks and his gang to be sure and contact those law
enforcement officials and repeat what they have been posting on
USENET - replete with their out of context fraud and false
accusations. Then at least the investigators will be sure to have
both sides of the issue - and then we can move to determine who is
lying to Federal Investigators and who is not.

I know my lawyers and I have complied volumes of evidence in this
regard, and I for one cannot wait to see what the gang says under
oath.

Like I said, I have been forced by the Nigel Brooks hate and smear
gang to move my defense to Nigel Brooks and his hate/smear and con
gang smear campaign to a new and higher legal level. Again, I cannot
wait to read what the gang says under oath! Sometimes the cover-up
(especially when you are dealing with a conspiracy) becomes more
important than the initial overt act.

Also please note that I have been forced and taunted by the Nigel
Brooks smear and con gang to take legal action against them before
they will stop their fraud, false accusations, serial lying, cons,
harassment, and general obloquy. I tried every way possible to avoid
legal action, but it became clear that Brooks and his fraud and hate
gang were not going to give me any other choice.

Here is what Brooks was caught lying about in respect to Google:

EXHIBIT "H" - A sampling of how the Nigel Brooks smear/hate and con
gang is claiming Google is supporting their malicious smears, fraud,
libel, defamation and unlawful harassment:

1. Nigel Brooks using Google to defame and claiming Google is working
with Nigel Brooks smear and defamation gang to smear and defame
Douglas Reiman, a.k.a. Doug Grant (Tm)

http://tinyurl.com/llqt7n Nigel Brooks defames dgvr...@comcast.net
due to Google's defamation that his profile has been removed due to a
violation of terms of service.

http://tinyurl.com/o7txcw March 23, 2009 another hate post from Nigel
Brooks claiming Google is working with him to defame me:

"On or about March 23, 2009, those wonderful folks at the Google
Archive (the
very same ones who reinstated Doug Reimans posts) made a very wise
decision.
The banned a poster from their archives effective on that date.
1. What this means is that if you use googlegroups as your usenet
newsreader -
you'll never be bothered by this insufferable fool again (unless of
course he morphs into another account - which can be easily remedied).

Nigel Brooks"

Doug Says: Note above that Google denies reinstating any posts, and
stated clearly:

"Google is a provider of information, not a mediator. We
> make no claims about the content of the many posts in our archive.
> We
> suggest addressing your concern directly to the author of the post
> in
> question.
>
> We are not equipped to assess the truth or falsity of statements
> posted to our site by third parties.

>If you choose to pursue legal action against this
>author, we are prepared to abide by any orders involving the
postings in
>question."

> Regards,
> The Google Team"
>

Note that Nigel Brooks' false statement above that " Google (the very
same ones who reinstated Doug Reimans posts)" has been exposed by the
Google legal team as yet another outright con and false defamation
about me posted by Nigel N. Brooks.

2. My statement about the cyberstalker web names google site:
http://tinyurl.com/nnq64d
Jan 8, 2009.
"Meanwhile, the above Google group is open for people that wish to
join it and post rebuttals or whatever. I should also mention that
everything posted on the above web site has also been posted on
USENET - so that Google group is just another forum of many that
carries the same information. The only reason that site exists is
because one of the gang members has boasted about being a "computer
consultant" and he has also boasted about removing my posts from
several USENET forums. This same gang member also boasted about
forcing my erred and discarded posts to reappear for the purpose of
cyberstalking with the use of fraud and forgeries he is fraudulently
attributing to me which he dug out of Google's wastebasket. (Or that a
Google employee provided).

Doug Grant (Tm)"

http://tinyurl.com/mec2ve

3. The above Google archived post was repeated dozens of times by
this Nigel Brooks hate/smear gang member that goes by the anonymous
name of "stev...@ntlworld.com His pattern and repeated defamation
and fraud about me on USENET and into the Google archives represents
an obvious malicious intent to harass me, and to cause me emotional
and professional harm, which is an alleged violation of a criminal
law in the State of Washington. (Unlawful Harassment). This key
Nigel Brooks hate gang member has also violated my copyrights on
several occasions. (See Title 17 for the descriptions of both civil
and criminal copyright violations). The gang members have no reason
whatsoever to repeatedly post and publish such fraud, defamation and
hate other than a clear and obvious malicious intent.

http://tinyurl.com/nqx2eu

4. May 3, 2009, Yet another post by the Stev...@ntlworld.com (Who
denies he is really Steve Leyland) that clearly states and proves the
erred posts' Google has certified to me in writing were removed from
my account and from the Google archives have been reinstated by
Google on its archives, and are being used as malicious libel,
defamation and as a means to unlawfully harass me.

(At last count there were more than 41 of such posts above posted by
the Nigel Brooks smear and hate gang all designed to use Google to
unlawfully harass me, and malicious defame and smear me, and to paint
me and my life in a defaming false light.

Note above that Google has denied the SteveL (who denies being Steve
Leyland) and Nigel Brooks outright cons and fraud about Google being
involved in reading my posts and deciding to reinstate them on the
Google archive. Nothing could be further from the truth, as the
Google legal team has clearly stated.

5. Nigel Brooks wrote the following, which claims that Google reads
my posts and GOOGLE decided to replace my long removed posts on the
Google archive "for the sake of the historical record." Mr. Brooks is
clearly, unmistakably and fraudulently claiming that Google is
working with him to smear, defame and unlawfully harass me.

Mr. Brooks also is lying when he said that Google "advised me in no
uncertain terms that they will not remove Mr. Brooks current site
(clearly dedicated to unlawful harassment, hate, smears, fraud, false
accusations and general obloquy) without a court order." I received
no such notice, nor any other notice in response to my numerous
complaints about the serberianbog Google site.

http://tinyurl.com/5uaukl June 10, 2008 Nigel Brooks wrote:

"Instead, I opted to transfer the site to one hosted by the good
people at Google (those same good folks who apparently revisited your
past efforts to removed the embarrassing posts - and decided for the
sake of the historical record, they should be reinstated). I note that
you have attempted to bully the Google folks to remove the site, using
the same tactics you used on the free webhosts. I have also noted that
Google has advised you in no uncertain terms that they will not remove
my current site without a court order.

Doug's Rebuttal: Nigel Brooks outrageous con and fraud stating above
as "Google (those same good folks who apparently revisited your past
efforts to removed the embarrassing posts - and decided for the sake
of the historical record, they should be reinstated)." HAS BEEN
COMPLETELY REFUTED AND PROVED A COMPLETE CON AND FRAUD BY THE GOOGLE
LEGAL TEAM! (See above).

http://tinyurl.com/mv6asu March 13, 2009:

6. The gang member that broke into my medical records is using and
referencing Google.

The following Nigel Brooks hate/smear gang member was the gang member
that was caught by federal investigators from the Veterans
Administration breaking into my private US Veterans Administration
records, sabotaging them by removing key documents and fraudulently
indicating on them that I had Cancer, and then trafficking and
publishing some of my and my wife's private information on USENET and
on the Google theserbonianbog web site owned and operated by Mr. Nigel
Brooks.

This issue applies to the Google group known as
http://groups.google.com/group/theserbonianbog

It is clear the Google newsgroup " theserbonianbog" was involved in
not only receiving but also housing and trafficking in stolen
information removed illegally from my Government medical files.

Also note this same hate gang member is claiming below that Google
reinstated my erred posts on the Google archive that Google had
previously certified to me in writing were permanently remove from the
Google archive for reasons attributed to Google management.

"AND, REGARDING YOUR CLAIM that SteveL, or Nigel, or myself hacked
into GOOGLE to retrieve the above from your "wastebasket", as you
show time and time again, you are fantastic on your accusations but
consistently lack any proof.... go ahead and complain to GOOGLE that
they were hacked.
Frankly, it is my opinion that GOOGLE reinstated your codswallop upon
learning of your propensity for threatening and harassing those who
challenged you, and especially your ongoing threats of lawsuit after
lawsuit.
--Mac, the Medic " (A.k.a. Dennis M. McDonnell).

Doug's Rebuttal: Dennis M. McDonnell's outrageous con and fraud
stating above as:
"Frankly, it is my opinion that GOOGLE reinstated your codswallop upon
learning of your propensity for threatening and harassing those who
challenged you, and especially your ongoing threats of lawsuit after
lawsuit." HAS BEEN COMPLETELY REFUTED AND PROVED A COMPLETE CON AND
FRAUD BY THE GOOGLE LEGAL TEAM! (See above).

7. Here is a post from Nigel Brooks fraudulently claiming that I
received a less than Honorable discharge from the US Army which was
posted via Google.

Message from discussion 1. Doug Grant receives less than honorable
discharge from military for sexual deviance charges...VIDEO PROOF
View parsed - Show only message text
Path:
g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!o41g2000yqb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Nigel Brooks <bettymar...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics
Subject: Doug Grant receives less than honorable discharge from
military for
sexual deviance charges...VIDEO PROOF
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 18:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 1
Message-ID:
<a8460f7d-8979-4895...@o41g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 98.77.154.240
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1252372871 7049 127.0.0.1 (8 Sep 2009
01:21:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 01:21:11 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
Injection-Info: o41g2000yqb.googlegroups.com;
posting-host=98.77.154.240;
posting-account=v3lC7QkAAABObSV_VspxF18_P_pGjZfY
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0;
Comcast
Install 1.0; GTB6; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0;
.NET CLR
3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30618),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)

http://tinyurl.com/6gk7p8

The above defamation is an absolute fraud and is typical of the fraud
that Nigel Brooks and his gang members post and have posted about me.

End sampling of the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and con gang using Google
and referencing Google's participation with the gang to smear, defame
and use unlawful harassment against the gang's targeted victims.
There are virtually *hundreds* of similar posts I could provide when I
am required to do so that involve and connect Google with this Nigel
Brooks smear gang.

Further, please again review my law firm's extensive letter with
hundreds of exhibits they have provided the US Attorney and other
Federal Investigators in respect to the actions of the Nigel Brooks
hate/smear and con gang - especially the acts of breaking into and
trafficking in my Veterans Administration records and then posting
some of those extremely private records on the Internet.

If you are involved in trafficking in my personal information I
suspect some will believe they can hide such events by removing
emails - boy are they in for a surprise!

Douglas Reiman

P.S. Note that clear morning report evidence of my admission to a
Hospital in Vietnam after a medevac from Can Tho, and my related stay
in that Hospital for several weeks, has been found and verified due
to the outstanding diligence of a clerk at the US National Personnel
Center at St. Louis. These records have been lost for more than forty
years - and we now know why they were lost. Up to now I never cared
one way or another to verify this event - but now I am prepared to
prove it in a court of law or to any investigator.

Now is the time for Nigel N. Brooks and his gang member to state their
accusations and defamation in writing - under oath. I strongly urge
them to do so. Then we can proceed accordingly. I am waiting for
their reply.

Douglas Reiman, a *real* Vietnam Veteran. (Formally a SFC E-7 in the
US Army).

"Mac McKinzie" <awrli...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hh0qr8$n90$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>
>
> try to tell me this isn't the url you posted or tell me what it
> actually is supposed to be. either way there ain't no conspiracy
> involved.
>
> off the meds again eh?

Trying to hide the above facts with child like nonsense and defamation
can only indicate to rational readers you nor your gang leaders
cannot refute the facts presented above. No doubt you will get your
chance later to repeat some of your fraud in a more exacting arena. I
look forward to your sworn statements.

Doug Grant (Tm)
>
>

[DGVREIMAN]

Nigel Brooks Served

Smear Merchant Disclaimer

Disclaimer Continues

http://tinyurl.com/otvaph

>>>> Nigel Brooks "

Nigel Brooks"

Question:

Lawyers Speak "again"

******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************

Issue Background:

Copyright Violations

Nigel Brooks"

> Regards,
> The Google Team"
>

Doug Grant (Tm)"

http://tinyurl.com/mec2ve

http://tinyurl.com/nqx2eu

http://tinyurl.com/6gk7p8

Douglas Reiman

"tankfixer" <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.259e09b...@news.bytemine.net...
> In article <hh0qr8$n90$1...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> awrli...@hotmail.com says...
>> Desperate attempt to hide the fact Google has proved Nigel Brooks a
>> liar and a fraud snipped. See above for what they are desperate
>> to hide.

Doug Grant (Tm)

[Mac McKinzie]

"DGVREIMAN" <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:CKSdnTwz7uGZ86nW...@giganews.com...

>
>
> GOOGLE PROVES BROOKS LYING! - REBUTTAL
>

> For all those that are ethical, believe in the truth, that is certainly
> NOT a
> Douglas Reiman attribute
>
well two can play at this cut and snip shit, dipshit

> P.S. Note that clear morning report evidence of my admission to a
> Hospital in Vietnam after a medevac from Can Tho, and my related stay
> in that Hospital for several weeks, has been found and verified due
> to the outstanding diligence of a clerk at the US National Personnel
> Center at St. Louis. These records have been lost for more than forty
> years - and we now know why they were lost. Up to now I never cared
> one way or another to verify this event - but now I am prepared to
> prove it in a court of law or to any investigator.
>

actually I still come up with Cake Farts when I click on that link

> Now is the time for Nigel N. Brooks and his gang member to state their
> accusations and defamation in writing - under oath. I strongly urge
> them to do so. Then we can proceed accordingly. I am waiting for
> their reply.
>
> Douglas Reiman, a *real* Vietnam Veteran. (Formally a SFC E-7 in the
> US Army).
>
>
>
> "tankfixer" <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.259e09b...@news.bytemine.net...
>> In article <hh0qr8$n90$1...@news.eternal-september.org>,
>> awrli...@hotmail.com says...
>>> Desperate attempt to hide the fact Google has proved Nigel Brooks a liar
>>> and a fraud snipped. See above for what they are desperate to hide.
>
>
> Doug Grant (Tm)

just above your sig line I see tankfixer being 'quoted' as saying nothing
and I am being quoted as saying something from someone elses (apparently
your shit) while it may be confusing to some it flat makes me want to
go nappy nap.

[tankfixer]

In article <CKSdnTwz7uGZ86nW...@giganews.com>,
dgvr...@comcast.net says...

>
> Now is the time for Nigel N. Brooks and his gang member to state their
> accusations and defamation in writing - under oath. I strongly urge
> them to do so. Then we can proceed accordingly. I am waiting for
> their reply.

Might I suggest, in the Christmas spirit of course, that you

Fuck off and die ?

> Douglas Reiman, a *real* Vietnam Veteran. (Formally a SFC E-7 in the
> US Army).
>
>
>
> "tankfixer" <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.259e09b...@news.bytemine.net...

> > [quoted text muted]

> > awrli...@hotmail.com says...
> >> Desperate attempt to hide the fact Google has proved Nigel Brooks a
> >> liar and a fraud snipped. See above for what they are desperate
> >> to hide.
>
>
> Doug Grant (Tm)

If you are wish to reply to me Mr Reiman then please do not snip out
what I post and please refrain from reporting your 1000+ line screed.

If you continue to commit fraud I shall be forced to take the proper
steps to ensure you are unable to do so in the future.

[tankfixer]

In article <hh2n6s$7qa$1...@news.eternal-september.org>,
awrli...@hotmail.com says...

Once more Rieman shows what a liar and fraud he truly is.
He replied to me but snipped away all of what I posted.
I look forward to handing that evidence of his lies and fraud to
whatever legitimate investigator who cares to contact me..

[Daryl Hunt]

tankfixer wrote:
> In article <CKSdnTwz7uGZ86nW...@giganews.com>,
> dgvr...@comcast.net says...
>> Now is the time for Nigel N. Brooks and his gang member to state their
>> accusations and defamation in writing - under oath. I strongly urge
>> them to do so. Then we can proceed accordingly. I am waiting for
>> their reply.
>
> Might I suggest, in the Christmas spirit of course, that you
>
> Fuck off and die ?

I suggest you take your own advice. Dougie won't.

[Daryl Hunt]

an...@anon.dontreply.com wrote:

>> Daryl the Twatwaffle said:
>
> ">I suggest you take your own advice. Dougie won't."
>

> Hunt, this is a place for military retirees. You don't fit in here for
> a reason. Now kiss off boy. I have seen those documents and they sure
> the hell look fake to me and a few others who have seen them.
>
> Mark
>
>

And this is a place for human beings. So, troll (and I am probably
insulting trolls) it's not a place for you.

[tankfixer]

In article <Ks9Zm.117947$Wf2....@newsfe23.iad>,
dh...@i70westnospam.com says...

>
> tankfixer wrote:
> > In article <CKSdnTwz7uGZ86nW...@giganews.com>,
> > dgvr...@comcast.net says...
> >> Now is the time for Nigel N. Brooks and his gang member to state their
> >> accusations and defamation in writing - under oath. I strongly urge
> >> them to do so. Then we can proceed accordingly. I am waiting for
> >> their reply.
> >
> > Might I suggest, in the Christmas spirit of course, that you
> >
> > Fuck off and die ?
>
>
> I suggest you take your own advice. Dougie won't.

Are you still alive ?
I figured you had frozen to death when that ISP you ran out of your
trailer failed.....

[Daryl Hunt]

You are partly correct. It's damned cold here right now. As for the
rest, you are just a troll, nothing more; adding exactly nothing
positive to any discussion.

Now I will have to apologize to the trolls. Thanks.

[Daryl Hunt]

an...@anon.dontreply.com wrote:
>> And this is a place for human beings. So, troll (and I am probably
>> insulting trolls) it's not a place for you.
>

> Like I said Hunt, I and others have reviewed those documents. They are
> fake. You will never be able to compete on these newsgroup because you
> are nothing but a wannabe. That is why the cops paid you no heed. Get
> over it loser.
>
> Mark

LOL, it seems it's my week for your stupidity. Last week it was you
ragging on that piece of trash Greene.

As for competing, there is nothing to compete for. Unless I wish to
compete with a loser like you on just how big of a loser I can be. But
that isn't going to happen. You just keep losing and trolling, stupid.

[Sharky]

Daryl Hunt wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHlopjHepEw

[Mac]

On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:47:13 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

>"AND, REGARDING YOUR CLAIM that SteveL, or Nigel, or myself hacked
>into GOOGLE to retrieve the above from your "wastebasket", as you
>show time and time again, you are fantastic on your accusations but
>consistently lack any proof.... go ahead and complain to GOOGLE that
>they were hacked.
>Frankly, it is my opinion that GOOGLE reinstated your codswallop upon
>learning of your propensity for threatening and harassing those who
>challenged you, and especially your ongoing threats of lawsuit after
>lawsuit.
>--Mac, the Medic " (A.k.a. Dennis M. McDonnell).

**********************************

>Doug's Rebuttal: Dennis M. McDonnell's outrageous con and fraud
>stating above as:
>"Frankly, it is my opinion that GOOGLE reinstated your codswallop upon
>learning of your propensity for threatening and harassing those who
>challenged you, and especially your ongoing threats of lawsuit after
>lawsuit." HAS BEEN COMPLETELY REFUTED AND PROVED A COMPLETE CON AND
>FRAUD BY THE GOOGLE LEGAL TEAM! (See above).

****************************
Kindly provide the very specific URL for your alleged source.
Would like to ascertain that such is actually from the GOOGLE LEGAL
TEAM and not yourself simply stating such.
-Mac, the Medic

[Daryl Hunt]

That's a good one :)

[Daryl Hunt]

an...@anon.dontreply.com wrote:
>> LOL, it seems it's my week for your stupidity. Last week it was you
>> ragging on that piece of trash Greene.
>>
>> As for competing, there is nothing to compete for. Unless I wish to
>> compete with a loser like you on just how big of a loser I can be. But
>> that isn't going to happen. You just keep losing and trolling, stupid.
>

> Hunt, You do not fit in here for valid reasons. You are not a military
> retiree. The paperwork you provided as proof was confirmed to be fake.
> That says it all. A 5 year old could have done a better job
> fabricating proof of service. The cops were on to your game and that
> is why they refused to press charges against Greene.
>
> Quite a history you have on the net as the King Kook.
>
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=daryl+hunt+rides+again&btnG=Search&sitesearch=
>
> Mark

Mark? Nopers. Sounds more like Greene and his socks are at it again.

[Daryl Hunt]

an...@anon.dontreply.com wrote:

> On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 21:11:15 -0700, Daryl "Kook" Hunt
> <dh...@i70westnospam.com> wrote:
>
>> Now I will have to apologize to the trolls. Thanks.
>

> It is funny when you, who is widely known as the king kook troll call
> others names.
>
>
> Mark

And exactly how do you contribute to anything? Now if you died at least
your carcass would give back to the earth.

[DGVREIMAN]

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
news:20gbj5h6q5niq5gpb...@4ax.com...

Mr. McDonnell, I provided the information I received from the Google
legal team below. Your fraudulent statements above about Google and
me have been proved completely false by the Google Legal Team. Note
the email I received below from Google. If you wish additional
information, please email me directly and verify your identity.

NIGEL BROOKS SERVED BY GOOGLE/LYCOS -REBUTTAL

Nigel Brooks Served

Smear Merchant Disclaimer

Disclaimer Continues

http://tinyurl.com/otvaph

>>>> Nigel Brooks "

Nigel Brooks"

Question:

Lawyers Speak "again"

******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************

Issue Background:

Copyright Violations

Nigel Brooks"

> Regards,
> The Google Team"
>

Doug Grant (Tm)"

http://tinyurl.com/mec2ve

http://tinyurl.com/nqx2eu

Doug's Rebuttal: Nigel Brooks outrageous con and fraud stating above
as "Google (those same good folks who apparently revisited your past

efforts to removed the embarrassing posts - and decided for the sake

of the historical record, they should be reinstated)." HAS BEEN

COMPLETELY REFUTED AND PROVED A COMPLETE CON AND FRAUD BY THE GOOGLE
LEGAL TEAM! (See above).

http://tinyurl.com/mv6asu March 13, 2009:

6. The gang member that broke into my medical records is using and
referencing Google.

The following Nigel Brooks hate/smear gang member was the gang member
that was caught by federal investigators from the Veterans
Administration breaking into my private US Veterans Administration
records, sabotaging them by removing key documents and fraudulently
indicating on them that I had Cancer, and then trafficking and
publishing some of my and my wife's private information on USENET and
on the Google theserbonianbog web site owned and operated by Mr. Nigel
Brooks.

This issue applies to the Google group known as
http://groups.google.com/group/theserbonianbog

It is clear the Google newsgroup " theserbonianbog" was involved in
not only receiving but also housing and trafficking in stolen
information removed illegally from my Government medical files.

Also note this same hate gang member is claiming below that Google
reinstated my erred posts on the Google archive that Google had
previously certified to me in writing were permanently remove from the
Google archive for reasons attributed to Google management.

"AND, REGARDING YOUR CLAIM that SteveL, or Nigel, or myself hacked

into GOOGLE to retrieve the above from your "wastebasket", as you
show time and time again, you are fantastic on your accusations but
consistently lack any proof.... go ahead and complain to GOOGLE that
they were hacked.
Frankly, it is my opinion that GOOGLE reinstated your codswallop upon
learning of your propensity for threatening and harassing those who
challenged you, and especially your ongoing threats of lawsuit after
lawsuit.
--Mac, the Medic " (A.k.a. Dennis M. McDonnell).

Doug's Rebuttal: Dennis M. McDonnell's outrageous con and fraud

stating above as:
"Frankly, it is my opinion that GOOGLE reinstated your codswallop upon
learning of your propensity for threatening and harassing those who
challenged you, and especially your ongoing threats of lawsuit after
lawsuit." HAS BEEN COMPLETELY REFUTED AND PROVED A COMPLETE CON AND
FRAUD BY THE GOOGLE LEGAL TEAM! (See above).

7. Here is a post from Nigel Brooks fraudulently claiming that I

http://tinyurl.com/6gk7p8

Douglas Reiman

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
news:ugfbj5t10bnl8fs55...@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:19:21 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>US ATTORNEY CONTACTED BY LAWYERS
> snip over 1,250 lines of codswallop
>
> ********************************
> In the screed with which you polluted several newsgroups, did
> you name the specific us attorney ??
>
> Did you provide that specific person's specific location ---that
> others might also contact that person and appraise him of your
> posting
> antics, your posting history, and your many claims?
>
> Did you provide the specific name and location of the "Lawyers"
> who,
> you claim, contacted the specific attorney??
>
> You have engaged in your threats for years ---- yet, your words seem
> to out-perform you lack of deeds...
> -Mac, the Medic

Path:
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-01.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mac <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net>
Newsgroups:
alt.war.vietnam,alt.military,alt.military.retired,alt.politics,alt.news-media
Subject: Re: US ATTORNEY CONTACTED BY LAWYERS
Message-ID: <ugfbj5t10bnl8fs55...@4ax.com>
References: <nvydnTtryqN0da7W...@giganews.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.2/32.830
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 20
X-Complaints-To: ab...@easynews.com
Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy!
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 23:44:39 -0800
Bytes: 1759
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.news-media:290224
alt.politics:5246427 alt.military.retired:462395 alt.military:462303
alt.war.vietnam:765749

Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell, (if this post came from anyone other than
Mr. McDonnell please advise) of course I provided all you requested to
Nigel Brooks and others that might be or allegedly could be involved
in stealing my (and my wife's) private medical information and
operating the gang's hate web sites. I filed official complaints
with both Google and Lycos, and they both have copies of my lawyer's
letter to the US Attorney. Nigel Brooks will be required to reply to
those complaints under oath, and when he does he will be sued in
Federal court within two weeks of his reply. Meanwhile, I will
continue with the complaints I have been advised to file.

Mr. Brooks has a copy of my lawyer's letter to the US Attorney, and
to whom else it was addressed, along with hundreds of exhibits.
Obviously, Nigel Brooks has the documents I mentioned above. All you
need to do is contact Mr. Brooks in the typical fashion you normally
do on a regular basis. (Please do not try to hide the past emails -
it would be a terrible mistake on your part as you must know they
cannot be ever really hidden).

Moreover, if you wish to *directly* receive the information you
requested, as I stated above, all you need to do is email me and ask.
As long as we can verify who you are, I will gladly provide you with
the information you have requested.

Moreover, your lies and fraud about me are well known, and if you wish
to provide them to investigators then I and my lawyers urge you to do
so - but not anonymously as you often attempt to do.

It is time to back up your hundreds of posts about me Mr. McDonnell
with your real name, we have reviewed them all and have noted several
deceptions and false statements. PLEASE repeat them while using your
real name - I urge you to do so at your first opportunity. At that
point we can determine if you are lying, and of course your real name
will be associated with your statements. If you are not lying I
would think you would WANT to back up your statements about me. If
you believe you are telling the truth, now is the time to back up your
statements with your real name.

Moreover, your acknowledgement that I provided you and others with
repeated notice to cease and desist your harassment and attacks
against me for *years* is hereby noted. Of course I attempted to
avoid litigation in every way I could, but obviously the gang's
smears, hate, fraud , *invasions of privacy* - unauthorized access to
my and my Wife's medical records, the trafficking in my private
medical information, and the posting of some of the stolen information
on USENET, and general false accusations continued regardless of my
and my lawyer's repeated notices to cease and desist such attacks.

I sincerely urge you to "go on the record" with your statements above
with specificity to the authorities and my lawyers - so be sure to
email me with your request for the information you stated you wished
to receive above.

I also have been informed that a Federal Investigator attempted to
contact you several times, yet you refused to speak with him nor
return his telephone calls. Is that information true or not? If it
is true then why are you withholding information from this
investigator?

Meanwhile, once again, I urge you to immediately cease and desist
your harassment, taunting and defamation as you have posted above and
elsewhere on this forum.

Douglas Reiman a.k.a. Doug Grant (Tm)

[DGVREIMAN]

US ATTORNEY CONTACTED BY LAWYERS

Nigel Brooks Served

Smear Merchant Disclaimer

Disclaimer Continues

http://tinyurl.com/otvaph

>>>> Nigel Brooks "

Nigel Brooks"

Question:

Lawyers Speak "again"

******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************

Issue Background:

Copyright Violations

Nigel Brooks"

> Regards,
> The Google Team"
>

Doug Grant (Tm)"

http://tinyurl.com/mec2ve

http://tinyurl.com/nqx2eu

http://tinyurl.com/6gk7p8

Douglas Reiman

Now is the time for Nigel N. Brooks and his gang member to state their

accusations and defamation in writing - under oath. I strongly urge
them to do so. Then we can proceed accordingly. I am waiting for
their reply.

Douglas Reiman, a *real* Vietnam Veteran. (Formally a SFC E-7 in the
US Army).

"Daryl Hunt" <dh...@i70westnospam.com> wrote in message
news:vW6_m.96067$We2....@newsfe09.iad...

It is time for the smear gang to back up their malicious and false
statements about me with their real names - failure to do so of course
indicates they know they have been lying all along. See above.

Doug Grant (Tm)
>

[DGVREIMAN]

US ATTORNEY CONTACTED BY LAWYERS

Nigel Brooks Served

Smear Merchant Disclaimer

Disclaimer Continues

http://tinyurl.com/otvaph

>>>> Nigel Brooks "

Nigel Brooks"

Question:

Lawyers Speak "again"

******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************

Issue Background:

Copyright Violations

Nigel Brooks"

> Regards,
> The Google Team"
>

Doug Grant (Tm)"

http://tinyurl.com/mec2ve

http://tinyurl.com/nqx2eu

http://tinyurl.com/6gk7p8

Douglas Reiman

Now is the time for Nigel N. Brooks and his gang member to state their

accusations and defamation in writing - under oath. I strongly urge
them to do so. Then we can proceed accordingly. I am waiting for
their reply.

Douglas Reiman, a *real* Vietnam Veteran. (Formally a SFC E-7 in the
US Army).

"Daryl Hunt" <dh...@i70westnospam.com> wrote in message

news:tX6_m.14118$ft1....@newsfe10.iad...

Doug Says: I would like to know more about charges that were filed in
the past and for what reasons and by whom. Please email me with the
details or post them here.

Thanks

Doug Grant (Tm)
>

[DGVREIMAN]

US ATTORNEY CONTACTED BY LAWYERS

Nigel Brooks Served

Smear Merchant Disclaimer

Disclaimer Continues

http://tinyurl.com/otvaph

>>>> Nigel Brooks "

Nigel Brooks"

Question:

Lawyers Speak "again"

******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************

Issue Background:

Copyright Violations

Nigel Brooks"

> Regards,
> The Google Team"
>

Doug Grant (Tm)"

http://tinyurl.com/mec2ve

http://tinyurl.com/nqx2eu

http://tinyurl.com/6gk7p8

Douglas Reiman

Now is the time for Nigel N. Brooks and his gang member to state their

accusations and defamation in writing - under oath. I strongly urge
them to do so. Then we can proceed accordingly. I am waiting for
their reply.

Douglas Reiman, a *real* Vietnam Veteran. (Formally a SFC E-7 in the
US Army).

"Daryl Hunt" <dh...@i70westnospam.com> wrote in message
news:tX6_m.14118$ft1....@newsfe10.iad...

[DGVREIMAN]

US ATTORNEY CONTACTED BY LAWYERS

Nigel Brooks Served

Smear Merchant Disclaimer

Disclaimer Continues

http://tinyurl.com/otvaph

>>>> Nigel Brooks "

Nigel Brooks"

Question:

Lawyers Speak "again"

******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************

Issue Background:

Copyright Violations

Nigel Brooks"

> Regards,
> The Google Team"
>

Doug Grant (Tm)"

http://tinyurl.com/mec2ve

http://tinyurl.com/nqx2eu

http://tinyurl.com/6gk7p8

Douglas Reiman

Now is the time for Nigel N. Brooks and his gang member to state their

accusations and defamation in writing - under oath. I strongly urge
them to do so. Then we can proceed accordingly. I am waiting for
their reply.

Douglas Reiman, a *real* Vietnam Veteran. (Formally a SFC E-7 in the
US Army).

"Daryl Hunt" <dh...@i70westnospam.com> wrote in message

news:3Y6_m.14119$ft1....@newsfe10.iad...

[Mac]

[Mac]

On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:36:36 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

>US ATTORNEY CONTACTED BY LAWYERS

****************************

[Mac]

On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:41:30 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

>US ATTORNEY CONTACTED BY LAWYERS

****************************

[Mac]

On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:29:03 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

******************************************************

Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell, (if this post came from anyone other than
Mr. McDonnell please advise) of course I provided all you requested to
Nigel Brooks and others that might be or allegedly could be involved
in stealing my (and my wife's) private medical information and
operating the gang's hate web sites. I filed official complaints
with both Google and Lycos, and they both have copies of my lawyer's
letter to the US Attorney.

REPLY:
Fine. Kindly provide the specific location of GOOGLE and also LYCOS
which you claim you contacted.
Kindly furnish the specific name of the specific person/office to
which "...copies of my lawyer's letter to the US Attorney" was sent.

FINALLY, how about posting the copy of that alleged letter to the
US Attorney --- including the month and date it was typed and also
sent.
-Mac, the Medic

[Mac]

On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:38:17 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

>US ATTORNEY CONTACTED BY LAWYERS

On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:29:03 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

>>>"AND, REGARDING YOUR CLAIM that SteveL, or Nigel, or myself hacked
>>>into GOOGLE to retrieve the above from your "wastebasket", as you
>>>show time and time again, you are fantastic on your accusations but
>>>consistently lack any proof.... go ahead and complain to GOOGLE that
>>>they were hacked.
>>>Frankly, it is my opinion that GOOGLE reinstated your codswallop
>>>upon
>>>learning of your propensity for threatening and harassing those who
>>>challenged you, and especially your ongoing threats of lawsuit after
>>>lawsuit.
>>>--Mac, the Medic " (A.k.a. Dennis M. McDonnell).

>> **********************************

>>>Doug's Rebuttal: Dennis M. McDonnell's outrageous con and fraud
>>>stating above as:
>>>"Frankly, it is my opinion that GOOGLE reinstated your codswallop
>>>upon
>>>learning of your propensity for threatening and harassing those who
>>>challenged you, and especially your ongoing threats of lawsuit after
>>>lawsuit." HAS BEEN COMPLETELY REFUTED AND PROVED A COMPLETE CON AND
>>>FRAUD BY THE GOOGLE LEGAL TEAM! (See above).

[Mac]

On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:41:30 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

>US ATTORNEY CONTACTED BY LAWYERS

On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:29:03 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

>>>"AND, REGARDING YOUR CLAIM that SteveL, or Nigel, or myself hacked
>>>into GOOGLE to retrieve the above from your "wastebasket", as you
>>>show time and time again, you are fantastic on your accusations but
>>>consistently lack any proof.... go ahead and complain to GOOGLE that
>>>they were hacked.
>>>Frankly, it is my opinion that GOOGLE reinstated your codswallop
>>>upon
>>>learning of your propensity for threatening and harassing those who
>>>challenged you, and especially your ongoing threats of lawsuit after
>>>lawsuit.
>>>--Mac, the Medic " (A.k.a. Dennis M. McDonnell).

>> **********************************

>>>Doug's Rebuttal: Dennis M. McDonnell's outrageous con and fraud
>>>stating above as:
>>>"Frankly, it is my opinion that GOOGLE reinstated your codswallop
>>>upon
>>>learning of your propensity for threatening and harassing those who
>>>challenged you, and especially your ongoing threats of lawsuit after
>>>lawsuit." HAS BEEN COMPLETELY REFUTED AND PROVED A COMPLETE CON AND
>>>FRAUD BY THE GOOGLE LEGAL TEAM! (See above).

[Mac]

On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:41:41 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

>
>US ATTORNEY CONTACTED BY LAWYERS

On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:29:03 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

>>>"AND, REGARDING YOUR CLAIM that SteveL, or Nigel, or myself hacked
>>>into GOOGLE to retrieve the above from your "wastebasket", as you
>>>show time and time again, you are fantastic on your accusations but
>>>consistently lack any proof.... go ahead and complain to GOOGLE that
>>>they were hacked.
>>>Frankly, it is my opinion that GOOGLE reinstated your codswallop
>>>upon
>>>learning of your propensity for threatening and harassing those who
>>>challenged you, and especially your ongoing threats of lawsuit after
>>>lawsuit.
>>>--Mac, the Medic " (A.k.a. Dennis M. McDonnell).

>> **********************************

>>>Doug's Rebuttal: Dennis M. McDonnell's outrageous con and fraud
>>>stating above as:
>>>"Frankly, it is my opinion that GOOGLE reinstated your codswallop
>>>upon
>>>learning of your propensity for threatening and harassing those who
>>>challenged you, and especially your ongoing threats of lawsuit after
>>>lawsuit." HAS BEEN COMPLETELY REFUTED AND PROVED A COMPLETE CON AND
>>>FRAUD BY THE GOOGLE LEGAL TEAM! (See above).

[DGVREIMAN]

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message

news:fbtkj5ljgi9n8mgtb...@4ax.com...

Mr. McDonnell, please see the instructions below in respect to how you
may obtain the information you are requesting. You need to email me
and verify your identity.

See below for the Google post:

[DGVREIMAN]

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message

news:tbtkj5ho4ah5svn92...@4ax.com...

Mr. McDonnell, you have repeated this request several times while
ignoring the information below that allows you to obtain what you are
requesting. Please learn to read.

Mr. McDonnell, please see the instructions below in respect to how you
may obtain the information you are requesting. You need to email me
and verify your identity.

See below for the Google post:

NIGEL BROOKS SERVED BY GOOGLE/LYCOS -REBUTTAL

Nigel Brooks Served

Smear Merchant Disclaimer

Disclaimer Continues

http://tinyurl.com/otvaph

>>>> Nigel Brooks "

Nigel Brooks"

Question:

Lawyers Speak "again"

******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************

Issue Background:

Copyright Violations

Nigel Brooks"

> Regards,
> The Google Team"
>

Doug Grant (Tm)"

http://tinyurl.com/mec2ve

http://tinyurl.com/nqx2eu

http://tinyurl.com/6gk7p8

Douglas Reiman

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
news:ugfbj5t10bnl8fs55...@4ax.com...

> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:19:21 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"

> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>US ATTORNEY CONTACTED BY LAWYERS

[DGVREIMAN]

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message

news:cdtkj5lb117gg4pld...@4ax.com...

Mr. McDonnell, you have repeated this request several times while
ignoring the information below that allows you to obtain what you are
requesting. Please learn to read.

Mr. McDonnell, please see the instructions below in respect to how you
may obtain the information you are requesting. You need to email me
and verify your identity.

See below for the Google post:

NIGEL BROOKS SERVED BY GOOGLE/LYCOS -REBUTTAL

Nigel Brooks Served

Smear Merchant Disclaimer

Disclaimer Continues

http://tinyurl.com/otvaph

>>>> Nigel Brooks "

Nigel Brooks"

Question:

Lawyers Speak "again"

******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************

Issue Background:

Copyright Violations

Nigel Brooks"

> Regards,
> The Google Team"
>

Doug Grant (Tm)"

http://tinyurl.com/mec2ve

http://tinyurl.com/nqx2eu

http://tinyurl.com/6gk7p8

Douglas Reiman

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
news:ugfbj5t10bnl8fs55...@4ax.com...

> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:19:21 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"

> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>US ATTORNEY CONTACTED BY LAWYERS

[DGVREIMAN]

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message

news:dqtkj51fq5nqunchs...@4ax.com...

Mr. McDonnell, you have been provided, several times, the means to
obtain the information you have repeatedly spammed this group about.
Simply email me as instructed below. Are you afraid to back up your
statements about me with your real name?

Mr. McDonnell, you have repeated this request several times while
ignoring the information below that allows you to obtain what you are
requesting. Please learn to read.

Mr. McDonnell, please see the instructions below in respect to how you
may obtain the information you are requesting. You need to email me
and verify your identity.

See below for the Google post:

Nigel Brooks Served

states based upon the conclusions of my law firm and their letter to
the US Attorney.

I have (with legal assistance) also rewritten my John Doe lawsuit and

Smear Merchant Disclaimer

Disclaimer Continues

http://tinyurl.com/otvaph

>>>> Nigel Brooks "

Nigel Brooks"

Question:

Lawyers Speak "again"

******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************

Issue Background:

Copyright Violations

Nigel Brooks"

> Regards,
> The Google Team"
>

Doug Grant (Tm)"

http://tinyurl.com/mec2ve

http://tinyurl.com/nqx2eu

Doug's Rebuttal: Nigel Brooks outrageous con and fraud stating above
as "Google (those same good folks who apparently revisited your past

efforts to removed the embarrassing posts - and decided for the sake

of the historical record, they should be reinstated)." HAS BEEN

COMPLETELY REFUTED AND PROVED A COMPLETE CON AND FRAUD BY THE GOOGLE
LEGAL TEAM! (See above).

http://tinyurl.com/mv6asu March 13, 2009:

6. The gang member that broke into my medical records is using and
referencing Google.

The following Nigel Brooks hate/smear gang member was the gang member
that was caught by federal investigators from the Veterans
Administration breaking into my private US Veterans Administration
records, sabotaging them by removing key documents and fraudulently
indicating on them that I had Cancer, and then trafficking and
publishing some of my and my wife's private information on USENET and
on the Google theserbonianbog web site owned and operated by Mr. Nigel
Brooks.

This issue applies to the Google group known as
http://groups.google.com/group/theserbonianbog

It is clear the Google newsgroup " theserbonianbog" was involved in
not only receiving but also housing and trafficking in stolen
information removed illegally from my Government medical files.

Also note this same hate gang member is claiming below that Google
reinstated my erred posts on the Google archive that Google had
previously certified to me in writing were permanently remove from the
Google archive for reasons attributed to Google management.

"AND, REGARDING YOUR CLAIM that SteveL, or Nigel, or myself hacked

into GOOGLE to retrieve the above from your "wastebasket", as you
show time and time again, you are fantastic on your accusations but
consistently lack any proof.... go ahead and complain to GOOGLE that
they were hacked.
Frankly, it is my opinion that GOOGLE reinstated your codswallop upon
learning of your propensity for threatening and harassing those who
challenged you, and especially your ongoing threats of lawsuit after
lawsuit.
--Mac, the Medic " (A.k.a. Dennis M. McDonnell).

Doug's Rebuttal: Dennis M. McDonnell's outrageous con and fraud

stating above as:
"Frankly, it is my opinion that GOOGLE reinstated your codswallop upon
learning of your propensity for threatening and harassing those who
challenged you, and especially your ongoing threats of lawsuit after
lawsuit." HAS BEEN COMPLETELY REFUTED AND PROVED A COMPLETE CON AND
FRAUD BY THE GOOGLE LEGAL TEAM! (See above).

7. Here is a post from Nigel Brooks fraudulently claiming that I

http://tinyurl.com/6gk7p8

Douglas Reiman

Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell, (if this post came from anyone other than

Mr. McDonnell please advise) of course I provided all you requested to
Nigel Brooks and others that might be or allegedly could be involved
in stealing my (and my wife's) private medical information and
operating the gang's hate web sites. I filed official complaints
with both Google and Lycos, and they both have copies of my lawyer's

[DGVREIMAN]

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message

news:lvtkj55bp6ct9aphj...@4ax.com...

Mr. McDonnell, you have been provided, several times, the means to
obtain the information you have repeatedly spammed this group about.
Simply email me as instructed below. Are you afraid to back up your
statements about me with your real name?

Mr. McDonnell, you have repeated this request several times while
ignoring the information below that allows you to obtain what you are
requesting. Please learn to read.

Mr. McDonnell, please see the instructions below in respect to how you
may obtain the information you are requesting. You need to email me
and verify your identity.

See below for the Google post:

NIGEL BROOKS SERVED BY GOOGLE/LYCOS -REBUTTAL

Nigel Brooks Served

states based upon the conclusions of my law firm and their letter to
the US Attorney.

I have (with legal assistance) also rewritten my John Doe lawsuit and

Smear Merchant Disclaimer

Disclaimer Continues

http://tinyurl.com/otvaph

>>>> Nigel Brooks "

Nigel Brooks"

Question:

Lawyers Speak "again"

******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************

Issue Background:

Copyright Violations

Nigel Brooks"

> Regards,
> The Google Team"
>

Doug Grant (Tm)"

http://tinyurl.com/mec2ve

http://tinyurl.com/nqx2eu

Doug's Rebuttal: Nigel Brooks outrageous con and fraud stating above
as "Google (those same good folks who apparently revisited your past

efforts to removed the embarrassing posts - and decided for the sake

of the historical record, they should be reinstated)." HAS BEEN

COMPLETELY REFUTED AND PROVED A COMPLETE CON AND FRAUD BY THE GOOGLE
LEGAL TEAM! (See above).

http://tinyurl.com/mv6asu March 13, 2009:

6. The gang member that broke into my medical records is using and
referencing Google.

The following Nigel Brooks hate/smear gang member was the gang member
that was caught by federal investigators from the Veterans
Administration breaking into my private US Veterans Administration
records, sabotaging them by removing key documents and fraudulently
indicating on them that I had Cancer, and then trafficking and
publishing some of my and my wife's private information on USENET and
on the Google theserbonianbog web site owned and operated by Mr. Nigel
Brooks.

This issue applies to the Google group known as
http://groups.google.com/group/theserbonianbog

It is clear the Google newsgroup " theserbonianbog" was involved in
not only receiving but also housing and trafficking in stolen
information removed illegally from my Government medical files.

Also note this same hate gang member is claiming below that Google
reinstated my erred posts on the Google archive that Google had
previously certified to me in writing were permanently remove from the
Google archive for reasons attributed to Google management.

"AND, REGARDING YOUR CLAIM that SteveL, or Nigel, or myself hacked

into GOOGLE to retrieve the above from your "wastebasket", as you
show time and time again, you are fantastic on your accusations but
consistently lack any proof.... go ahead and complain to GOOGLE that
they were hacked.
Frankly, it is my opinion that GOOGLE reinstated your codswallop upon
learning of your propensity for threatening and harassing those who
challenged you, and especially your ongoing threats of lawsuit after
lawsuit.
--Mac, the Medic " (A.k.a. Dennis M. McDonnell).

Doug's Rebuttal: Dennis M. McDonnell's outrageous con and fraud

stating above as:
"Frankly, it is my opinion that GOOGLE reinstated your codswallop upon
learning of your propensity for threatening and harassing those who
challenged you, and especially your ongoing threats of lawsuit after
lawsuit." HAS BEEN COMPLETELY REFUTED AND PROVED A COMPLETE CON AND
FRAUD BY THE GOOGLE LEGAL TEAM! (See above).

7. Here is a post from Nigel Brooks fraudulently claiming that I

http://tinyurl.com/6gk7p8

Douglas Reiman

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
news:ugfbj5t10bnl8fs55...@4ax.com...

> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:19:21 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"

> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>US ATTORNEY CONTACTED BY LAWYERS

Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell, (if this post came from anyone other than

Mr. McDonnell please advise) of course I provided all you requested to
Nigel Brooks and others that might be or allegedly could be involved
in stealing my (and my wife's) private medical information and
operating the gang's hate web sites. I filed official complaints
with both Google and Lycos, and they both have copies of my lawyer's

[DGVREIMAN]

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message

news:90ukj5ttn8nl9q0e2...@4ax.com...

Mr. McDonnell, I have provided you with the means and instructions to
obtain your requested information several times. Are you have some
kind of reading comprehension problems? Also, we are waiting for
your answer if you refused to answer calls from a Federal
Investigator?

Why are you hiding from backing up your posts about me with your real
name?

Mr. McDonnell, you have been provided, several times, the means to
obtain the information you have repeatedly spammed this group about.
Simply email me as instructed below. Are you afraid to back up your
statements about me with your real name?

Mr. McDonnell, you have repeated this request several times while
ignoring the information below that allows you to obtain what you are
requesting. Please learn to read.

Mr. McDonnell, please see the instructions below in respect to how you
may obtain the information you are requesting. You need to email me
and verify your identity.

See below for the Google post:

NIGEL BROOKS SERVED BY GOOGLE/LYCOS -REBUTTAL

Nigel Brooks Served

states based upon the conclusions of my law firm and their letter to
the US Attorney.

I have (with legal assistance) also rewritten my John Doe lawsuit and

Smear Merchant Disclaimer

Disclaimer Continues

http://tinyurl.com/otvaph

>>>> Nigel Brooks "

Nigel Brooks"

Question:

Lawyers Speak "again"

******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************

Issue Background:

Copyright Violations

Nigel Brooks"

> Regards,
> The Google Team"
>

Doug Grant (Tm)"

http://tinyurl.com/mec2ve

http://tinyurl.com/nqx2eu

Doug's Rebuttal: Nigel Brooks outrageous con and fraud stating above
as "Google (those same good folks who apparently revisited your past

efforts to removed the embarrassing posts - and decided for the sake

of the historical record, they should be reinstated)." HAS BEEN

COMPLETELY REFUTED AND PROVED A COMPLETE CON AND FRAUD BY THE GOOGLE
LEGAL TEAM! (See above).

http://tinyurl.com/mv6asu March 13, 2009:

6. The gang member that broke into my medical records is using and
referencing Google.

The following Nigel Brooks hate/smear gang member was the gang member
that was caught by federal investigators from the Veterans
Administration breaking into my private US Veterans Administration
records, sabotaging them by removing key documents and fraudulently
indicating on them that I had Cancer, and then trafficking and
publishing some of my and my wife's private information on USENET and
on the Google theserbonianbog web site owned and operated by Mr. Nigel
Brooks.

This issue applies to the Google group known as
http://groups.google.com/group/theserbonianbog

It is clear the Google newsgroup " theserbonianbog" was involved in
not only receiving but also housing and trafficking in stolen
information removed illegally from my Government medical files.

Also note this same hate gang member is claiming below that Google
reinstated my erred posts on the Google archive that Google had
previously certified to me in writing were permanently remove from the
Google archive for reasons attributed to Google management.

"AND, REGARDING YOUR CLAIM that SteveL, or Nigel, or myself hacked

into GOOGLE to retrieve the above from your "wastebasket", as you
show time and time again, you are fantastic on your accusations but
consistently lack any proof.... go ahead and complain to GOOGLE that
they were hacked.
Frankly, it is my opinion that GOOGLE reinstated your codswallop upon
learning of your propensity for threatening and harassing those who
challenged you, and especially your ongoing threats of lawsuit after
lawsuit.
--Mac, the Medic " (A.k.a. Dennis M. McDonnell).

Doug's Rebuttal: Dennis M. McDonnell's outrageous con and fraud

stating above as:
"Frankly, it is my opinion that GOOGLE reinstated your codswallop upon
learning of your propensity for threatening and harassing those who
challenged you, and especially your ongoing threats of lawsuit after
lawsuit." HAS BEEN COMPLETELY REFUTED AND PROVED A COMPLETE CON AND
FRAUD BY THE GOOGLE LEGAL TEAM! (See above).

7. Here is a post from Nigel Brooks fraudulently claiming that I

http://tinyurl.com/6gk7p8

Douglas Reiman

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
news:ugfbj5t10bnl8fs55...@4ax.com...

> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:19:21 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"

> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>US ATTORNEY CONTACTED BY LAWYERS

Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell, (if this post came from anyone other than

Mr. McDonnell please advise) of course I provided all you requested to
Nigel Brooks and others that might be or allegedly could be involved
in stealing my (and my wife's) private medical information and
operating the gang's hate web sites. I filed official complaints
with both Google and Lycos, and they both have copies of my lawyer's

[DGVREIMAN]

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message

news:l0ukj5hqi0u3hme8f...@4ax.com...

Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell: I have provided you with the means to obtain
all information below. Also, why are you afraid to answer the
question in respect to if you refused to call back or talk to a
Federal Investigator when he contacted you?

If you truly want the information you are requesting simply email me
with the request as specified below. Are you having trouble
understanding the instructions below?

Mr. McDonnell, you have been provided, several times, the means to
obtain the information you have repeatedly spammed this group about.
Simply email me as instructed below. Are you afraid to back up your
statements about me with your real name?

Mr. McDonnell, you have repeated this request several times while
ignoring the information below that allows you to obtain what you are
requesting. Please learn to read.

Mr. McDonnell, please see the instructions below in respect to how you
may obtain the information you are requesting. You need to email me
and verify your identity.

See below for the Google post:

NIGEL BROOKS SERVED BY GOOGLE/LYCOS -REBUTTAL

Nigel Brooks Served

states based upon the conclusions of my law firm and their letter to
the US Attorney.

I have (with legal assistance) also rewritten my John Doe lawsuit and

Smear Merchant Disclaimer

Disclaimer Continues

http://tinyurl.com/otvaph

>>>> Nigel Brooks "

Nigel Brooks"

Question:

Lawyers Speak "again"

******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************

Issue Background:

Copyright Violations

Nigel Brooks"

> Regards,
> The Google Team"
>

Doug Grant (Tm)"

http://tinyurl.com/mec2ve

http://tinyurl.com/nqx2eu

Doug's Rebuttal: Nigel Brooks outrageous con and fraud stating above
as "Google (those same good folks who apparently revisited your past

efforts to removed the embarrassing posts - and decided for the sake

of the historical record, they should be reinstated)." HAS BEEN

COMPLETELY REFUTED AND PROVED A COMPLETE CON AND FRAUD BY THE GOOGLE
LEGAL TEAM! (See above).

http://tinyurl.com/mv6asu March 13, 2009:

6. The gang member that broke into my medical records is using and
referencing Google.

The following Nigel Brooks hate/smear gang member was the gang member
that was caught by federal investigators from the Veterans
Administration breaking into my private US Veterans Administration
records, sabotaging them by removing key documents and fraudulently
indicating on them that I had Cancer, and then trafficking and
publishing some of my and my wife's private information on USENET and
on the Google theserbonianbog web site owned and operated by Mr. Nigel
Brooks.

This issue applies to the Google group known as
http://groups.google.com/group/theserbonianbog

It is clear the Google newsgroup " theserbonianbog" was involved in
not only receiving but also housing and trafficking in stolen
information removed illegally from my Government medical files.

Also note this same hate gang member is claiming below that Google
reinstated my erred posts on the Google archive that Google had
previously certified to me in writing were permanently remove from the
Google archive for reasons attributed to Google management.

"AND, REGARDING YOUR CLAIM that SteveL, or Nigel, or myself hacked

into GOOGLE to retrieve the above from your "wastebasket", as you
show time and time again, you are fantastic on your accusations but
consistently lack any proof.... go ahead and complain to GOOGLE that
they were hacked.
Frankly, it is my opinion that GOOGLE reinstated your codswallop upon
learning of your propensity for threatening and harassing those who
challenged you, and especially your ongoing threats of lawsuit after
lawsuit.
--Mac, the Medic " (A.k.a. Dennis M. McDonnell).

Doug's Rebuttal: Dennis M. McDonnell's outrageous con and fraud

stating above as:
"Frankly, it is my opinion that GOOGLE reinstated your codswallop upon
learning of your propensity for threatening and harassing those who
challenged you, and especially your ongoing threats of lawsuit after
lawsuit." HAS BEEN COMPLETELY REFUTED AND PROVED A COMPLETE CON AND
FRAUD BY THE GOOGLE LEGAL TEAM! (See above).

7. Here is a post from Nigel Brooks fraudulently claiming that I

http://tinyurl.com/6gk7p8

Douglas Reiman

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
news:ugfbj5t10bnl8fs55...@4ax.com...

> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:19:21 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"

> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>US ATTORNEY CONTACTED BY LAWYERS

Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell, (if this post came from anyone other than

Mr. McDonnell please advise) of course I provided all you requested to
Nigel Brooks and others that might be or allegedly could be involved
in stealing my (and my wife's) private medical information and
operating the gang's hate web sites. I filed official complaints
with both Google and Lycos, and they both have copies of my lawyer's

[Mac]

On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:55:11 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

>I also have been informed that a Federal Investigator attempted to
>contact you several times, yet you refused to speak with him nor
>return his telephone calls. Is that information true or not? If it
>is true then why are you withholding information from this
>investigator?

*********************
Not, you little loon.
HOWEVER, go ahead and provide the specific name and the specific
office wherein this alleged "Federal Investigator" is.

Of course, given the history of your postings, and the history of your
antics, whenever you are asked to confirm your blathering by providing
specific information I believe that it is yourself who appears to then
spew forth something else... in a very desperate attempt not to
provide documentation of your blathering.

AGAIN: as you still have NOT provided the specific URL of your
assertion of complaints to GOOGLE and LYCOS that does not refer to
your own little WebPages.... well, then, "go ahead and provide the
specific name and the specific office wherein this alleged "Federal
Investigator" is."
-Mac, the Medic

[Mac]

On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:57:51 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

>I also have been informed that a Federal Investigator attempted to
>contact you several times, yet you refused to speak with him nor
>return his telephone calls. Is that information true or not? If it
>is true then why are you withholding information from this
>investigator?
>
>Meanwhile, once again, I urge you to immediately cease and desist
>your harassment, taunting and defamation as you have posted above and
>elsewhere on this forum.
>
>Douglas Reiman a.k.a. Doug Grant (Tm

********************************************
See previous message regarding your blathering regarding the alleged
"Federal Investigator"....

Here is where you claimed that you had a PURPLE HEART.
Headers and the Date, and the Subject provided to make it easier for
anyone interested to check your posturing....

===============================================
Here is a copy of your ORIGINAL POST in that thread.
I've included the DATE, the SUBJECT, the groups... so others can
find this and verify what you originally posted in your attempt to
belittle Chip.

I believe that he and you for this conversation were #16 AND #17 in
this thread...

=========== ===========
Newsgroups: alt.news-media, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa,
alt.politics.usa.congress, alt.security.terrorism
From: "DGVREIMAN" <dggr...@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 22:22:46 GMT
Local: Sun, Feb 16 2003 2:22�pm
Subject: Re: Al Qaeda Says Saddam an Infidel

> On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 19:56:03 GMT, �DGVREIMAN allegedly wrote...
Doug Says: �We declared war on terrorism. �Saddam is
supporting, financing, arming, training, aiding and harboring
terrorists.
Duh. �I suspect that you do not have clue about what you are
talking about, and I further suspect you have never seen a
shot fired in anger in your life.
CHIP STATED:
> I have a Purple Heart and a CAR that proves you wrong, Dougie.
> There are other countries, some that are our allies, who are
much more active in supporting and arming terrorists...yet you want
to go after Iraq because you don't have the will to go after them.
That, to me is cowardice.

Doug Says: �
I have a Purple Heart also, and I received �mine in a
real war, I can't imagine where you got yours since you have
never fought in a war. �About the only place you could have
received a purple heart was in Lebanon, and that was not a
shooting war, just a bombing due to the ineptitude of a gang of
Marine officers. �In respect to deposing Saddam, I am the one
advocating removing Saddam, you are the one advocating cowering,
hiding, and doing nothing. �It is pretty clear who the coward is
around here. �BTW, bragging about a Purple Heart not received in
combat is about as cowardly as it gets.
=====================

[Mac]

On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:57:51 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

You stated that you shot the little girl.
You did NOT claim you were shooting AROUND that little girl.
You stated --- (( HEADERS provided... ))
Note the Date, the HEADERS, and the Subject and the Groups.
ALSO note that nowhere does he hint that this is what he is now
desperately claiming it to be: "fiction".

Draw your own conclusions as to the mental make-up of the person who
would spew forth the following in a debate/conversation with another
person.
=============

From: "DGVREIMAN" <dggr...@worldnet.att.net
Newsgroups:

alt.news-media,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.politics.usa.congress,alt.security.terrorism
References:
<Dflp8.13307$se.13...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net
<uabpeks...@corp.supernews.com
<4hmp8.13400$se.13...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net
<3CA62E0D...@exploratoire.ch
<IYtp8.14415$Eb5.1...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net
<3CA82636...@exploratoire.ch
Subject: Re: Arafat Refuses Land Back
Lines: 300

Message-ID:
<g80q8.17599$se.16...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 16:45:00 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.82.130.222
X-Complaints-To: ab...@worldnet.att.net
X-Trace: bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1017679500 12.82.130.222
(Mon, 01 Apr 2002 16:45:00 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 16:45:00 GMT
Organization: AT&T Worldnet

Doug Says:
Colin, you have not seen such films unless they were produced for
propaganda purposes.
When I was in Vietnam little children were given toe poppers (small
mines) hidden in cigarette packages, then they were told by the
Communists to give this nice gift to the American GI's as they passed
by their village.
I will never forget the day when a little smiling girl no more than 4
or 5 years old started walking towards me trying to give me a pack of
cigarettes.
I was forced to shoot her.

**********************************
It is nice to know that you have never forgotten the day when you shot
that little girl !!

NOTE the differences.
In APRIL, 2002 you clearly state:
"I was forced to shoot her."

Once you have been challenged on the above bullshit, on June 6th,
2009, you now desperately try claiming:
"... about shooting around a little girl in
Vietnam to make a point about how the
Commie Vietnamese used little children
to murder..."

SEVEN years later you try to insert that little preposition of
"around" --- instead of your former declarative statement that you
had been "...forced to shoot her."

So, when are you proceeding with that lawsuit?
You know, the one you have been threatening everyone with for YEARS
and YEARS....
-Mac, the Medic

[Mac]

On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:57:51 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

NEWSGROUP, Date, SUBJECT provided to help verify the claims of Doug
Grant...

� � �Mar 18, 2002
Question - Did you kill anyone?
DOUG'S ANSWER:
As many VC and NVA as I could. (1803 estimated BC in 2.5 tours
with only 3 wounded in my team). It is too bad however that we did not
kill more.

From: "DOUGLAS G.V. REIMAN" <dggr...@worldnet.att.net
Newsgroups: alt.news-media
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 14:39:33 -0800
Subject: Re: Surely that should read 'Americans are
dangerous'? - was:
Re: Alerts Are Dangerous
As many VC and NVA as I could. (1803 estimated BC in 2.5 tours
with only 3 wounded in my team).

[Mac]

On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:57:51 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

DOUG GRANT and O.C.S. ---�ButterBars�...

Newsgroups: alt.news-media, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa,
alt.politics.usa.congress, alt.security.terrorism

From: "DOUGLAS G.V. REIMAN" <dggr...@worldnet.att.net>

Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 07:34:31 -0800
Local: Sun, Dec 23 2001 10:34�am
Subject: Re: Military Experts on FOX & CNN?
Reply to author | Forward | Print | View thread | Show original |
Report this message | Find messages by this author

Joe, the sad truth is the Brits are right. �I went through three
Butter Bars during my first tour in Vietnam (as a SFC) then I
went to OCS and returned as a Butter Bar myself. �Half of my
graduating class in OCS Ft. Benning ended up dead or wounded.
Doug Grant (Tm)

[Mac]

On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:57:51 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

Newsgroups: alt.security.terrorism, alt.terrorism.world-trade-center

From: "DOUGLAS G.V. REIMAN" <dggr...@worldnet.att.net>

Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 22:14:01 GMT
Local: Sat, Oct 6 2001 3:14�pm
Subject: TERROR FIGHTS BACK

When I was in Vietnam, stationed in Can Tho, I witnessed two
ambulances drive through our main gate, calmly drive to our
airport, drive on the tarmac and while driving down the tarmac
Viet Cong contained in the ambulances shot each plane on the
tarmac with a M-79 grenade launcher. �Then when they were
through, they simply drove out the back gate and down the road.
This was a "drive-by" on an airport!
�These six or seven Viet Cong, equipped with simple weapons (that
look like big shotguns) destroyed an entire American Army air
base in about five minutes!
..... SNIP ....
The Viet Cong were also experts with mortars. �They would steal
trucks, and while driving down a road fire several mortar rounds
from those moving trucks all at different altitudes. �By firing
in this manner the mortar rounds would all fall in the same
general area within about ten seconds of each other. �
...SNIP .........
Doug Grant (Tm)
--
De Oppresso Liber
Happy Birthday
--
De Oppresso Liber
Happy Birthday
****************************** ***************
The above described event took place in December of 1967.
Doug Grant was NOT in Vietnam in any part of 1967 ---although he
claims to have �witnessed� the above event.
The ambulances were employed in that December, 1967 attack.

HOWEVER, in January of 1969 the air field was again attacked --- but
NOT with ambulances and certainly NOT in the manner which Doug Grant
claimed above.

[Mac]

On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:57:51 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

CLAIMS that Doug Grant was �wounded�...

War is a terrible thing to behold.� I know, I fought in one for a very
long time, and I was wounded and almost lost my life

ITEM ONE: *******************************
The date is �May 21,1998 �and the UseNet Group is
<rec.gambling.blackjack>
HERE IS WHAT YOU WROTE ---I'll put into CAPITAL LETTERS the sentence
that you posted....

QUOTE:
From: DOUGLAS REIMAN
Date: Thurs, May 21 1998 12:00 am

Now Ed, where DID you get that medical degree! �
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Give it back you forgot your change.
I think I was wrong a few times.
�I certainly was wrong when I volunteered for my second tour in
Vietnam. �
AND I WAS WRONG TO THINK THE VC �THAT FIRED AT ME WOULD NOT HIT ME. �
---CLOSE QUOTES---
If the VC fired at him and �hit him�, he claimed he was �wounded�.

ITEM TWO: *****************************
AS FOR HIS STATEMENT �...almost lost my life� Such was in his
response to:
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.blackjack
From: "John Salerno" <johnj...@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 14:59:25 -0500
Local: Wed, Sep 12 2001 12:59�pm
Subject: Re: An Act of War

"DOUGLAS G.V. REIMAN" <dggr...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:rgNn7.21838$KV3.1...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...

> War is a terrible thing to behold. I know, I fought in one for a
> very long time, and I was wounded and almost lost my life. Yet I
> would fight again today, and send my sons to fight.

ITEM THREE: *****************************

From: "DOUGLAS G.V. REIMAN" <dggr...@worldnet.att.net>

Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa
Subject: An Act of War
Lines: 100
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Message-ID:
<yHKn7.16963$Uf1.1...@bgtnsc06-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 14:55:26 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.82.138.81
X-Complaints-To: ab...@worldnet.att.net
X-Trace: bgtnsc06-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1000306526 12.82.138.81
(Wed, 12 Sep 2001 14:55:26 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 14:55:26 GMT
Organization: AT&T Worldnet
SNIP-
War is a terrible thing to behold. I know, I fought in one for a
very long time, and I was wounded and almost lost my life. Yet I
would fight again today, and send my sons to fight.
ITEM FOUR: ****************************
Path:
archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed2.news.rcn.net!rcn!wn1feed!worldnet.att.net!bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "DGVREIMAN" <dggr...@worldnet.att.net>
Newsgroups:
alt.news-media,alt.politics.usa,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa.congress,alt.security.terrorism
References: <1e7I8.5688$LC3.4...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
<Te8I8.7517$h54.20...@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>
<IKbI8.6023$LC3.4...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
<a0s3fusqcaeg95sdf...@4ax.com>
Subject: Re: Re: A RACE AGAINST TIME
Lines: 530
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Message-ID: <sasI8.7174$LC3.5...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 15:22:00 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.82.136.159
X-Complaints-To: ab...@worldnet.att.net
X-Trace: bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1022512920 12.82.136.159
(Mon, 27 May 2002 15:22:00 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 15:22:00 GMT
Organization: AT&T Worldnet
SNIP
And yes, I fought for my country, and I killed the enemy and I
was wounded in the process. I would do it again in a New York
minute.
********************* *********

[Mac]

On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:50:13 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

>
>"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
>news:fbtkj5ljgi9n8mgtb...@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:29:03 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
>> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Mr. McDonnell, I provided the information I received from the Google
>>>legal team below. Your fraudulent statements above about Google
>>>and
>>>me have been proved completely false by the Google Legal Team.
>>>Note
>>>the email I received below from Google. If you wish additional
>>>information, please email me directly and verify your identity.
>> ****************************
>> Kindly provide the very specific URL for your alleged source.
>> Would like to ascertain that such is actually from the GOOGLE LEGAL
>> TEAM and not yourself simply stating such.
>> -Mac, the Medic
>
>Mr. McDonnell, please see the instructions below in respect to how you
>may obtain the information you are requesting. You need to email me
>and verify your identity.

************************
Poppycock, you little loon.
One, you already have information as to who I am.
You also, as with Nigel, have the address.
You claimed there was the URL for the GOOGLE matter.
I simply asked you for that URL ---with the cavet that it not be to
one of your WebPages wherein you simply post your opinion.
IN OTHER WORDS, the URL should specifically reference the GOOGLE
LEGAL TEAM.
Failure for you to do so will, I believe, dinstinctly indicate that,
once again, you are blathering and posting your bilge.
-Mac, the Medic

[Mac]

On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:51:20 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

>
>"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
>news:tbtkj5ho4ah5svn92...@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:36:36 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
>> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>>US ATTORNEY CONTACTED BY LAWYERS
>>
>> ****************************
>> Kindly provide the very specific URL for your alleged source.
>> Would like to ascertain that such is actually from the GOOGLE LEGAL
>> TEAM and not yourself simply stating such.
>> -Mac, the Medic
>
>Mr. McDonnell, you have repeated this request several times while
>ignoring the information below that allows you to obtain what you are
>requesting. Please learn to read.

=======================
Oh??
That "LegalCouch" site of yours ?????
Sorry, under advice I am NOT contacting for, given what appears to be
your history of abuse, your history of antics, I believe that you
would promptly began whinning that you are being harassed.

IN THE MEANTIME, what is so difficult for you to provide either the
URL or the names of the people at GOOGLE, including their office, and
of course, the name of the "alleged Federal Investigator"...
-Mac, the Medic

[Mac]

On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:52:01 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

>It is time to back up your hundreds of posts about me Mr. McDonnell
>with your real name, we have reviewed them all and have noted several
>deceptions and false statements. PLEASE repeat them while using your
>real name - I urge you to do so at your first opportunity. At that
>point we can determine if you are lying, and of course your real name
>will be associated with your statements. If you are not lying I
>would think you would WANT to back up your statements about me. If
>you believe you are telling the truth, now is the time to back up your
>statements with your real name.

*********************************
You know my name.
You had it from that CyberStalker.
You also have it from the complaint I filed regarding you in Clark
County.
I see that I shall print out your latest.
Then telephone over to Clark County, especially the office of the
District Attorney, and make arrangements to go in their and file
another complaint this coming week.
-Mac, the Medic

[DGVREIMAN]

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message

news:kb7mj5h7fc0s4rk61...@4ax.com...

> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:52:01 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>It is time to back up your hundreds of posts about me Mr. McDonnell
>>with your real name, we have reviewed them all and have noted
>>several
>>deceptions and false statements. PLEASE repeat them while using
>>your
>>real name - I urge you to do so at your first opportunity. At that
>>point we can determine if you are lying, and of course your real
>>name
>>will be associated with your statements. If you are not lying I
>>would think you would WANT to back up your statements about me. If
>>you believe you are telling the truth, now is the time to back up
>>your
>>statements with your real name.
>
> *********************************

Path:
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mac <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net>
Newsgroups: alt.war.vietnam,alt.military,alt.military.retired
Subject: Re: Repeated Posts while Ignoring facts (was Re: reiman
posting cake farts?
Message-ID: <kb7mj5h7fc0s4rk61...@4ax.com>
References: <Lq6dnboSW67Qm6fW...@giganews.com>
<nctkj514g0hql327h...@4ax.com>
<tcWdnY99b9z5U6fW...@giganews.com>

X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.2/32.830
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Lines: 23

X-Complaints-To: ab...@easynews.com
Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy!
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.

Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:29:39 -0800
Bytes: 2168
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.military.retired:462547
alt.military:462594 alt.war.vietnam:765859

> You know my name.
> You had it from that CyberStalker.
> You also have it from the complaint I filed regarding you in Clark
> County.
> I see that I shall print out your latest.
> Then telephone over to Clark County, especially the office of the
> District Attorney, and make arrangements to go in their and file
> another complaint this coming week.
> -Mac, the Medic

Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell: We all know that you filed a bogus
complaint with the Clark county DA replete with evidence posted by Tom
Rau and not by me. We also know the DA threw out your bogus complaint
due to false and/or zero evidence. Now you are attempting to extort
me from rebutting your fraud and false accusations by publically
threatening me again with more bogus and false criminal charges?
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

You post your fraud and smears against me, and when I respond with a
rebuttal you threaten me with more false and bogus criminal charges to
stop me from posting the truth about your fraud? Do you *really*
believe you can extort me from rebutting your fraud about me with such
extortion?

Do you really believe you can extort me from posting my rebuttals to
your lies and false accusations by threatening me with more bogus
criminal charges?

Threatening me with filing another bogus criminal complaint to stop me
from rebutting your fraud and false accusations is not something you
should not do. You really need to speak with a lawyer. But then no
one said you were very smart. You have been harassing me for years
as your posting history clearly proves - and when I respond you
attempt to extort me to stop responding to your fraud and false
accusations with filing more bogus false charges - do you really
expect to get away with such extortion?

However, as I told you several times in response to your repeated
howls for more information, when you email me and verify your real
name then you will receive the information you have requested. If you
are afraid to email me and back up your fraud and false statements
with your real name then of course I understand your hesitency as we
both know you have lied about me repeatedly. Also, you seem to be
afraid to answer the question whether you were contacted by a Federal
Investigator and you refused to talk with him or call him back? Why
are you hiding from that simple question? Either it is true or it is
not.

Also, why did you post the same question repeatedly while ignoring my
reply for you to simply email me to obtain the information you were
demanding? Are you having a reading comprehension problem again?

Also, this extortion threat is a keeper.

Doug Grant (Tm)

[DGVREIMAN]

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message

news:al6mj55or57u0dpag...@4ax.com...

.
Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell, as you have been told several times, if you
wish to obtain the additional information you have requested in
respect to the following post, then simply email me and request it,
and once we verify the email came from Dennis M. McDonnell, you will
be furnished all that you have asked for.

http://tinyurl.com/ykw4b8u Nigel Brooks served by Google and Lycos.

If you have a problem emailing me and verifying your real name and
backing up your fraud you have posted about me, that is understandable
as we both know you are lying.

Your failure to simply email me with a request for this information
you seem to desperately need will of course prove that you are afraid
to back up your statements about me, and of course that you are lying.

Doug Grant (Tm)

[DGVREIMAN]

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message

news:t65mj55tbv6einh1r...@4ax.com...

Doug Says: Just to be sure you are responding the way it appears, let
me get this straight Mr. McDonnell. You are claiming you were never
contacted by a Federal Investigator, and he DID NOT leave several
messages for you, and you refused to call him back?

Just to be clear about all this; if you say you were never contacted,
then why are you asking for the name of the investigator? Obviously,
you are stating the investigator lied when he said he contacted you
and you refused to speak with him or call him back? Is that your
claim?

Or, are you stating there never was any investigation of you by any
federal investigator that you know of that pertained to me?

Be clear Mr. McDonnell.

Doug Grant (Tm)

[DGVREIMAN]

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message

news:nl5mj5ptprcl39qt7...@4ax.com...

> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:57:51 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
> You stated that you shot the little girl.

Fiction.

Doug Grant (Tm)
>

[DGVREIMAN]

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message

news:0v5mj5l29stvkd2je...@4ax.com...

> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:57:51 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> NEWSGROUP, Date, SUBJECT provided to help verify the claims of Doug
> Grant...
>
>
> Mar 18, 2002
> Question - Did you kill anyone?
> DOUG'S ANSWER:
> As many VC and NVA as I could. (1803 estimated BC in 2.5 tours
> with only 3 wounded in my team). It is too bad however that we did
> not
> kill more.

Doug's Rebuttal:

Key words: "Estimated" - and "We." Mr. McDonnell's title is
obviously fraudulent and meant to harass with outright fraud and false
accusations:

Doug Grant (Tm)

[DGVREIMAN]

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message

news:b46mj51838tmvomr9...@4ax.com...

Mr. McDonnell know the typo above was a typo as I had said previously
and subsequently several times that I was promoted to SFC E-7 AFTER I
left OCS. The (as a SFC) was in the wrong position in the paragraph
above, here is what I really said: (Note that I had already told Joe
several times prior that I was a NCO in Vietnam - the discussion about
being forced to perform the duties of a platoon leader (butter bar)
although I was a platoon sergeant due to a shortage of butter bars -
which the last sentence confirms.

Joe, the sad truth is the Brits are right. I went through three

> Butter Bars during my first tour in Vietnam then I
> went to OCS and returned as a Butter Bar myself. (As an SFC).

Half of my
> graduating class in OCS Ft. Benning ended up dead or wounded.
> Doug Grant (Tm)

Why would Mr. McDonnell post a post with a known typo and then try to
claim it said something it clearly did not? Malicious defamation and
harassment of course.

Responding to Mr. McDonnell in respect to his fraud is akin to
responding to a mentally retarded child - he is either incredibly
stupid and he cannot read, or he is determined to continue to use his
fraud and false accusations to maliciously defame and harass me
regardless of the facts and the truth of the matter.

Doug Grant (Tm)
>

>

[DGVREIMAN]

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message

news:o66mj5dt8gq3qlbft...@4ax.com...

> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:57:51 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Newsgroups: alt.security.terrorism, alt.terrorism.world-trade-center
> From: "DOUGLAS G.V. REIMAN" <dggr...@worldnet.att.net>
> Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 22:14:01 GMT
> Local: Sat, Oct 6 2001 3:14 pm
> Subject: TERROR FIGHTS BACK
>
>
>
> When I was in Vietnam, stationed in Can Tho, I witnessed two
> ambulances drive through our main gate, calmly drive to our
> airport, drive on the tarmac and while driving down the tarmac
> Viet Cong contained in the ambulances shot each plane on the
> tarmac with a M-79 grenade launcher. Then when they were
> through, they simply drove out the back gate and down the road.
> This was a "drive-by" on an airport!
> These six or seven Viet Cong, equipped with simple weapons (that
> look like big shotguns) destroyed an entire American Army air
> base in about five minutes!

> ..... SNIP ....
> The Viet Cong were also experts with mortars. They would steal
> trucks, and while driving down a road fire several mortar rounds
> from those moving trucks all at different altitudes. By firing
> in this manner the mortar rounds would all fall in the same
> general area within about ten seconds of each other.

Doug's rebuttal:: The mortar comment had nothing to do with the
attack I witnessed in Can Tho - I never said it did. Mr. McDonnell
is misassocating that quip so he can further his fraud and defamation
about this issue, implied or otherwise. I was in Can Tho during the
January 1969 attack. I described it as I remembered it, and I posted
where several other eye witnessess agreed with what I said I saw. Mr.
Dennis M. McDonnell was a ward attendant at a hospital unit. He was
not in Can Tho. He is attempting to state that he knows what I saw,
and I do not. He is maliciously making these fraudulent accusations
for the obvious purpose of malcious defamation and harassment.

Doug Grant (Tm)

[tankfixer]

In article <M9GdneRkV6bv2aHW...@giganews.com>,
dgvr...@comcast.net says...

Oddly enough that isn'ta link to any actual service..
It is just another of your fraudulent claims

>
>
> If you have a problem emailing me and verifying your real name and
> backing up your fraud you have posted about me, that is understandable
> as we both know you are lying.
>
> Your failure to simply email me with a request for this information
> you seem to desperately need will of course prove that you are afraid
> to back up your statements about me, and of course that you are lying.

Smell the desperation....

[DGVREIMAN]

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message

news:tb6mj594iclvjvje8...@4ax.com...

So? Are you claiming I was not wounded?

Doug Grant (Tm)

[DGVREIMAN]

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message

news:7r6mj5p5165dpbrjj...@4ax.com...

Doug's Rebuttal: I have not abused anything or anyone, and I
certainly do not have a history of doing so. I demand you retract
that defamation and apologize at once. I also do not have a history
of "antics." Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell, I have *invited* you to
email me. You will retain a copy of your email. That can hardly be
construed as harassment by anyone. You posting your fraud and
defamation out of context and "framed" misleading, mischaracterized
and deceptive statements about me on USENET is certainly clear
evidence of harassment.

You know that your email will be verified as coming from you that is
why you are afraid to email me and back up your statements with
verification of your real name. You are frightened to email me
because you know that you can be then held responsible for the lies
and fraud you have posted about me. Of course if you were not lying
you would not be afraid to email me with your request for additional
information.

Also, whom has provided you with your "advice?" Is that the same bogus
lawyer that you claim sent me a cease and desist notice before or
after you started visiting Muslim Mosques about me?

If you want to know the name(s) of the Federal Investigators (there
are more than one) and the name of the one that said he called you and
you refused to call him back, and obtain a copy of my lawyer's letter
to the Attorney General, and all the other information you have
requested you can (1) ask Nigel Brooks as he is in possession of it
all, or (2) email me and request the information directly, in which
case you will be contacted and your real name verified, and then you
will be provided the information you have requested.

Your fear to email me due to your knowledge you could be held
responsible for your false accusations and harassment is
understandable.

BTW, have you ever been fired from a medical job due to unauthorized
accessing of medical records, and told that you can never again
access medical information in connection with that job or entity? Is
that true or not? And if it is true, who notified you of the firing
and restrictions?

Doug Grant (Tm)

[Mac]

========================
Take yet another look at your own words.
Your posturing says one thing.
Completely at odds with your later statement issued after you were
challenged regarding the first statement --- especially when your
military records showed that you did NOT arrive until after the even
wherein that ambulance drove onto the airport, as you claimed.
-Mac, the Medic

[Mac]

============================

>Doug Says: Just to be sure you are responding the way it appears, let
>me get this straight Mr. McDonnell. You are claiming you were never
>contacted by a Federal Investigator, and he DID NOT leave several
>messages for you, and you refused to call him back?
>
>Just to be clear about all this; if you say you were never contacted,
>then why are you asking for the name of the investigator? Obviously,
>you are stating the investigator lied when he said he contacted you
>and you refused to speak with him or call him back? Is that your
>claim?
>
>Or, are you stating there never was any investigation of you by any
>federal investigator that you know of that pertained to me?
>
>Be clear Mr. McDonnell.
>
>Doug Grant (Tm)

============================
As nicely as I could I was bluntly calling you a liar.
Given your statements regarding Nigel and GOOGLE; given your
statements about an Officer of the Law seeking SteveL, and then given
your statement that you claim I was contacted by a Federal
Investigator....
well, given your posting history and your antics, I thought I would
call your bluff.
If such did happen you would have the name and the office of that
person.
I would promptly call him up and share with him some of what you have
been claiming.
HOWEVER, given your history, I doubt that you will have the courage
of your accusations and I doubt very much that you will provide that
simple information.

Just as you can not provide the URL and the information regarding that
GOOGLE information ----beyond referring to your own page wherein you
have deposited one of your screeds that is notable for the amazing
lack of proof, of evidence supporting your contention.
-Mac, the Medic

[Mac]

On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:52:40 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

>
>"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message

>news:cdtkj5lb117gg4pld...@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:41:30 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"

>> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>>US ATTORNEY CONTACTED BY LAWYERS
>>
>> ****************************
>> Kindly provide the very specific URL for your alleged source.
>> Would like to ascertain that such is actually from the GOOGLE LEGAL
>> TEAM and not yourself simply stating such.
>> -Mac, the Medic

**********************************

>Mr. McDonnell, you have repeated this request several times while
>ignoring the information below that allows you to obtain what you are
>requesting. Please learn to read.

***************************
All you have done is provide a URL which goes to a WebPage created by
yourself which contains yet another of your screeds but lacks any
proof, any evidence.... still waiting for you to rpovide that
specific information.
-Mac, the Medic

[Mac]

On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:22:18 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

>
>"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
>news:kb7mj5h7fc0s4rk61...@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:52:01 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
>> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>>It is time to back up your hundreds of posts about me Mr. McDonnell
>>>with your real name, we have reviewed them all and have noted
>>>several
>>>deceptions and false statements. PLEASE repeat them while using
>>>your
>>>real name - I urge you to do so at your first opportunity. At that
>>>point we can determine if you are lying, and of course your real
>>>name
>>>will be associated with your statements. If you are not lying I
>>>would think you would WANT to back up your statements about me. If
>>>you believe you are telling the truth, now is the time to back up
>>>your
>>>statements with your real name.
>>
>> *********************************

>From: Mac <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net>

>Newsgroups: alt.war.vietnam,alt.military,alt.military.retired
>Subject: Re: Repeated Posts while Ignoring facts (was Re: reiman
>posting cake farts?
>Message-ID: <kb7mj5h7fc0s4rk61...@4ax.com>
>References: <Lq6dnboSW67Qm6fW...@giganews.com>
><nctkj514g0hql327h...@4ax.com>
><tcWdnY99b9z5U6fW...@giganews.com>
>X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.2/32.830

>X-Complaints-To: ab...@easynews.com

>Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:29:39 -0800

>> You know my name.

>> You had it from that CyberStalker.
>> You also have it from the complaint I filed regarding you in Clark
>> County.
>> I see that I shall print out your latest.
>> Then telephone over to Clark County, especially the office of the
>> District Attorney, and make arrangements to go in their and file
>> another complaint this coming week.
>> -Mac, the Medic

************************

>Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell: We all know that you filed a bogus
>complaint with the Clark county DA replete with evidence posted by Tom
>Rau and not by me. We also know the DA threw out your bogus complaint
>due to false and/or zero evidence. Now you are attempting to extort
>me from rebutting your fraud and false accusations by publically
>threatening me again with more bogus and false criminal charges?
>BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
>
>You post your fraud and smears against me, and when I respond with a
>rebuttal you threaten me with more false and bogus criminal charges to
>stop me from posting the truth about your fraud? Do you *really*
>believe you can extort me from rebutting your fraud about me with such
>extortion?

**************************
Once again you make a claim for the Clark County DA that is not what
he said.
However, if you wish to believe what you state that is your option.
I'll be in Clark County this coming week to share with the local TV
station you claims of being shot by the VC, being wounded, almost
losing your life, and your claim of having a PURPLE HEART.

I will also share that with the local VA there in Vancouver,
Washington.
And, I shall share with Clark County some of your recent postings and
continued threats and cyberstalking....

I'll also let them know that you claim to have contacted the FBI in
Portland and another agency and perhaps they can do a little checking
seeing as you seem so hesitant to provide information.

AND, OF COURSE, I'll let them know of your claim that an officer of
the law was looking for SteveL......
-Mac, the Medic
-Mac, the Medic

[Mac]

=====================
No: you are claiming that the VC fired at you.
That they wounded you.
That you almost lost your life.
And that you have a PURPLE HEART.
Fortunately, your posting lists the date, the subject, and exactly
what you stated in trying to impress the people in that newsgroup
and there is the eMail address for you.
That should help them.
It only takes a moment or two to find those previous postings.
But the date, the newsgroup, and the subject really help.
-Mac, the Medic

[Mac]

On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:21:34 -0800, tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com>
wrote:

TANKFIXER:

>Oddly enough that isn'ta link to any actual service..
>It is just another of your fraudulent claims

==========================

>> If you have a problem emailing me and verifying your real name and
>> backing up your fraud you have posted about me, that is understandable
>> as we both know you are lying.
>>
>> Your failure to simply email me with a request for this information
>> you seem to desperately need will of course prove that you are afraid
>> to back up your statements about me, and of course that you are lying.

TANKFIXER:
>Smell the desperation....
*********************************
Notice he wants people to respond to his "legalcouch" addy ----
didn't he once claim that some attorney would be there and
responding ?????
Given his antics, I would not put it past him to claim harassment.
Oh, well, I doubt he has the courage of his accusations and that he
will simply waffle and refuse to provide specific names and locations.
Hope you're having a pleasant time TANKFIXER, and I figure I can
head over to Clark County next week.
I'll call the local VA and some of the Veterans Groups so I can
present them with some of what that person claims, in his OWN WORDS.
I'll include the HEADERS so they can verify for themselves and track
how he was challenged and how he changed his story.
-Mac, the Medic

[Dr. Vincent Quin, Ph.D.]

DGVREIMAN wrote:
>
> Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell, I have *invited* you to email me.
>

> You know that your email will be verified as coming from you that is why
> you are afraid to email me and back up your statements with verification
> of your real name. You are frightened to email me because you know that
> you can be then held responsible for the lies and fraud you have posted
> about me. Of course if you were not lying you would not be afraid to
> email me with your request for additional information.

There it is...in a nutshell...

(they are also afraid to phone you)
;-)

--
Each person has an individual responsibility to determine if his actions are moral, and
no government or army may ever take that responsibility away.

definition:
murder - the unjustifiable and intentional killing of people, NO EXCEPTIONS.

[tankfixer]

In article <n7noj59ot9n2d5752...@4ax.com>,
NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net says...

The fool can't get an attorney to even answer his calls anymore I bet..
Shoot, Doug will have ahard time finding a criminal defense attorney
when the time comes...

> Given his antics, I would not put it past him to claim harassment.
> Oh, well, I doubt he has the courage of his accusations and that he
> will simply waffle and refuse to provide specific names and locations.
> Hope you're having a pleasant time TANKFIXER, and I figure I can
> head over to Clark County next week.
> I'll call the local VA and some of the Veterans Groups so I can
> present them with some of what that person claims, in his OWN WORDS.
> I'll include the HEADERS so they can verify for themselves and track
> how he was challenged and how he changed his story.
> -Mac, the Medic

You wouldn't recognise the post, they started the new AFRC so old post
HQ and the museum are gone.
The museum moved into the armory and will remain there.. A good deal for
them, they have way too much to display in that old building..

[Nigel Brooks]

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message

news:bnloj5lb0tiqtl3gh...@4ax.com...

As most are aware, I consigned the loonytune to my killfile many moons ago.
I therefore never see anything he posts in this forum unless he is replied
to. I refuse to communicate with him directly as I am convinced it only
would serve to acerbate his obviously deteriorating mental condition. This
ridiculous argument has been going on now for three months shy of five
years.

I have reviewed the documentary and historical evidence, compared it to his
past usenet braggadocio and have made my conclusions. I am firm in my
conviction that my original opinion of him was correct. The proof is all
there and can easily be confirmed by anyone who cares to take the time to
research the braggadocio claims of the past, and compare those claims to the
actual records.

I'm somewhat perplexed and puzzled at his latest claim however:
**********************
"Nigel Brooks Served

By this time Mr. Nigel N. Brooks and some of his gang members have
been contacted by the legal departments from Google and Lycos asking
them for sworn certification in respect to their rampant and flagrant
copyright violations on their "Get Doug" web sites and Google groups
(Federal court has ruled that "Fair Use" does not apply if a pattern
of spite and defamation is connected to the copyright violations).

Ergo, Mr. Brooks already knows the name of my law firm, the law
enforcement people that are already involved, and he has by now read
my law firm's letter to the US Attorney, and to various Federal law
enforcement entities. I am waiting for Brooks and his gang members
sworn statement replies that must be sent back to the Google and Lycos
agents, and of course I invite the hate/smear gang members to make
and issue statements to my lawyer, the US Attorney, law enforcement,
Google and Lycos about this issue. In fact, I and others *cannot
wait* to see their statements under oath!"
*******************************************
For the record - as of this date, December 31, 2009 I have not been
contacted by lawyers, legal departments, or any one else purporting to
represent Lycos or Google. I have no knowledge of the identity of any law
firm currently representing Reiman .

I have no knowledge of the identity or any law enforcement agency or
individual purported to be involved, and I have never read any letter
purporting to be from Reiman's attorney to the United States Attorney.

I'd be interested to hear specifically what legal theory would allow either
Google or Lycos to require any individual not party to a lawsuit, to furnish
a statement under oath, or even respond.

That being said, considering the fact that Reiman is claiming I have
knowledge of such communications, I invite him to post proof of that claim
in this forum. I invite him to specifically identify the law enforcement
agency involved in this bizarre proceeding, and I invite him to publish any
communication he has received from Lycos, Google, law enforcement etc in
this regard. As I am apparently a party to this phantom action - I give my
permission to Reiman to publish the communications.

In the highly unlikely event that I am contacted by anyone purporting to
represent Reiman my standard answer applies - Arkell v. Pressdram.

Interested readers of this forum may rest assured that if I receive any
communication whatsoever from law enforcement, Lycos, Google, or any
claiming to represent Reiman - I will immediately publish it for all the
word to see.

Nigel Brooks

[DGVREIMAN]

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message

news:9nmoj5l27r46b5fh0...@4ax.com...

Path:
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-05.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail

From: Mac <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net>
Newsgroups: alt.war.vietnam,alt.military,alt.military.retired
Subject: Re: Repeated Posts while Ignoring facts (was Re: reiman
posting cake farts?

Message-ID: <9nmoj5l27r46b5fh0...@4ax.com>
References: <Lq6dnboSW67Qm6fW...@giganews.com>
<nctkj514g0hql327h...@4ax.com>
<tcWdnY99b9z5U6fW...@giganews.com>
<kb7mj5h7fc0s4rk61...@4ax.com>
<CYKdnSo28NqA3qHW...@giganews.com>

X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.2/32.830
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Lines: 81

X-Complaints-To: ab...@easynews.com
Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy!
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.

Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:09:03 -0800
Bytes: 4757
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.military.retired:462579
alt.military:462712 alt.war.vietnam:765894

> Once again you make a claim for the Clark County DA that is not what
> he said.
> However, if you wish to believe what you state that is your option.
> I'll be in Clark County this coming week to share with the local TV
> station you claims of being shot by the VC, being wounded, almost

> losing your life, and your claim of having a PURPLE HEART.+

Doug Says: BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Suddenly you are not going to the DA's
office but to some TV station? Which TV Station? Moreover, if you
wish to continue to spread your fraud and lies to third parties you
are doing nothing but creating witnessess to your designed harassment
and smear campaign. But I am sure you would want the TV station you
contact to hear both sides like all of the Investigators have don't
you? You really would not want to hide information from them would
you? Lies by omisssion and false contexts and similar deceptions?

>
> I will also share that with the local VA there in Vancouver,
> Washington.

Doug Says: Are you allowed to enter the VA? Have you have been fired
from the VA for accessing and publishing private medical information?

> And, I shall share with Clark County some of your recent postings
> and
> continued threats and cyberstalking....

Mr. McDonnell, your threat to return to the DA of Clark county and
again use them to bolster your smear campaign against me is hereby
noted. My responses to you are rebuttals to your fraud. If you
believe such extortion threats will stop me from posting the truth
about your fraud you are mistaken.

>
> I'll also let them know that you claim to have contacted the FBI in
> Portland and another agency and perhaps they can do a little
> checking
> seeing as you seem so hesitant to provide information.

Mr. McDonnell, I offered you this information if you simply emailed me
and verified your identity - which means you would need to back up
your fraud with your real name - and that is why you are whining
excuse after excuse to not email me with that request.

>
> AND, OF COURSE, I'll let them know of your claim that an officer of
> the law was looking for SteveL......

Doug Says: Mr. McDonnell, in this post alone you have threatened me
with extortion, false light defamation and harassment to third
parties, and several other seemingly desperate false acts and
accusations. You will not stop me from posting my truthful rebuttals
to your fraud, false accusations and obloquy with your threats. I
have a right to defend myself from your fraud, and I will continue to
do so.

Please advise us when you complete all of the threats you have posted
herein so I can follow up on them.
.
Doug Grant (Tm)

[DGVREIMAN]

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message

news:8gmoj5lofd2b775oo...@4ax.com...

Doug Says: You obviously have not read the following post.

http://tinyurl.com/ygy52yg Smear Merchant Disclaimer which applies to
this post:

After I posted the following proof that Nigel Brooks had been caught
lying by Google, and Google's legal team had verified that fact, Mr.
McDonnell started posting his typical defamation and false accusation
smear routine. Here is what I posted in respect to Google, which
contains nothing but the truth and the facts: (Note a copy of an
email I received from Google's legal team is included)

http://tinyurl.com/ykw4b8u Nigel Brooks served by Google and Lycos.

And If you wish additional information from me, you need to simply
email me with your request, verify your identity, and you will be
provided all of which you request. You have no reason to not email me
and verify your real name not unless you know you are lying. The
email will be retained by you, and its contents represent a simple
request for information. Your claim that I could claim such an
invited email was harassment is a pathetic excuse to not associate
your real name with the fraud you are posting about me. (Which of
course is understandable).

I should also inform you that once a post has been discarded and
removed from the Google archives due to a typo and an error, and that
act is recorded by Google - once someone retrieves that discarded
erred or typo post from my electronic waste basket and then reproduces
that long discarded post on USENET - the words contained in that post
are NOT MY WORDS - they are the words of the unethical fraud merchant
that dug through my waste basket so as to use known errors and typos
as a means to smear and defame me.

Also, you have not answered my question whether you were fired from
any entity for accessing medical records without authorization?

Is that true or not? And if true, which agency were you fired from?

Doug Grant (Tm)

[DGVREIMAN]

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message

news:bnloj5lb0tiqtl3gh...@4ax.com...

Puffing Up Military Resume Fraud - Rebutted

http://tinyurl.com/ygy52yg Smear Merchant Disclaimer which applies to
this post:

Mr. McDonnell, I asked you a question, I did not state anything, so it
is impossible for me to be lying. I was simply attempting to verify
something I was told. Your response was to a question - please do
not fraudulently state the facts so as to defame.

> Given your statements regarding Nigel and GOOGLE; given your
> statements about an Officer of the Law seeking SteveL, and then
> given
> your statement that you claim I was contacted by a Federal
> Investigator....
> well, given your posting history and your antics, I thought I would
> call your bluff.
> If such did happen you would have the name and the office of that
> person.
> I would promptly call him up and share with him some of what you
> have
> been claiming.
> HOWEVER, given your history, I doubt that you will have the courage
> of your accusations and I doubt very much that you will provide that
> simple information.

Mr. McDonnell, when you retrieve waste basket errors and then claim
those were the intended words of the person that discarded the post
due to error, ambiguity or typo, that is outright and obviously
malcious fraud. Also, when you take issues out of context and lie
about their true context, and then claim your fraud was intended by
the person you are attempting to smear, that also is fraud and libel.

From what I have read thus far coming from you, you are sprewing and
spreading YOUR WORDS which are defaming, disgusting and fraudulently
and then attempting to paint your own words and contexts as mine. We
both know nothing could be further from the truth.

Also I accused you of nothing, I simply asked you if you were
contacted, and you said you were not. I find your answer strange
considering what I have been told, but I will investigate further.

However, please answer this question: Have you ever been fired from a
position due to the unauthorized access of someones medical records?
(Note as was the other, this is a simple question not an accusation,
please do not lie about its intent).

>
> Just as you can not provide the URL and the information regarding
> that
> GOOGLE information ----beyond referring to your own page wherein
> you
> have deposited one of your screeds that is notable for the amazing
> lack of proof, of evidence supporting your contention.
> -Mac, the Medic

Mr. McDonnell, all you need to do is email me and ask for the
information you have requested. If you are afraid to do so because
your real name will be then connected to your fraud you post about me
that is understandable - so I suggest you have your lawyer contact me
instead. You have no reason to refuse to email me if you believe I
have forged the Google legal team document, which any moron can easily
see that I did not. Read the following post carefully Mr. McDonnell,
and you can easily see the Google email did not come from me, nor
could it have - it came from the Google legal team.

http://tinyurl.com/ykw4b8u Nigel Brooks served by Google and Lycos.

Doug Grant (Tm)

[DGVREIMAN]

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message

news:o66mj5dt8gq3qlbft...@4ax.com...

> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:57:51 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>

> Newsgroups: alt.security.terrorism, alt.terrorism.world-trade-center

> From: "DOUGLAS G.V. REIMAN" <dggr...@worldnet.att.net>

> Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 22:14:01 GMT
> Local: Sat, Oct 6 2001 3:14 pm
> Subject: TERROR FIGHTS BACK
>
>
>
> When I was in Vietnam, stationed in Can Tho, I witnessed two
> ambulances drive through our main gate, calmly drive to our
> airport, drive on the tarmac and while driving down the tarmac
> Viet Cong contained in the ambulances shot each plane on the
> tarmac with a M-79 grenade launcher. Then when they were
> through, they simply drove out the back gate and down the road.
> This was a "drive-by" on an airport!
> These six or seven Viet Cong, equipped with simple weapons (that
> look like big shotguns) destroyed an entire American Army air
> base in about five minutes!
> ..... SNIP ....
> The Viet Cong were also experts with mortars. They would steal
> trucks, and while driving down a road fire several mortar rounds
> from those moving trucks all at different altitudes. By firing
> in this manner the mortar rounds would all fall in the same
> general area within about ten seconds of each other.

> ...SNIP .........
> Doug Grant (Tm)
> --
> De Oppresso Liber
> Happy Birthday
> --
> De Oppresso Liber
> Happy Birthday
> ****************************** ***************
> The above described event took place in December of 1967.
> Doug Grant was NOT in Vietnam in any part of 1967 ---although he
> claims to have "witnessed" the above event.
> The ambulances were employed in that December, 1967 attack.
>
> HOWEVER, in January of 1969 the air field was again attacked ---
> but
> NOT with ambulances and certainly NOT in the manner which Doug
> Grant
> claimed above.

Doug's Rebuttal: As usual, Mr. McDonnell is lying about my military
service, as the following post demonstrates. Mr. McDonnell cannot
possibly determine what I saw, he was not in Can Tho, and he was a
Ward Attendant working for some Hospital unit. Here are the facts and
the confirmation by OTHER WITNESSESS that what I described was
accurate - contrary to the misrepresentations and fraud from Mr.
McDonnell about this issue:

NIGEL BROOKS CAN THO FRAUD - REBUTTAL

Smear Merchant Disclaimer

I have better things to do than rebut the fraud and false accusations
made by members of the Nigel Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
However, unlike the gang's other smear victims, I will defend myself
from the gang's obloquy and fraud in each case. You would think these
pathetic souls would find something to do other than spread their
fraud, hate and smears about people that disagree with them, but alas,
this has become their "pathetic life."

Note that Nigel Brooks and some of his hate/smear/con gang members
maintain web sites and a Google Newsgroup designed specifically to
defame me with fraud, serial lying, outright con man fraud, and of
course libel, which forces me to rebut their fraud with these truthful
rebuttals.

I have offered Nigel Brooks (and/or any of his con/hate/smear gang
members) the opportunity to take their fraud and false accusations to
the American Association of Arbitrators, or to any legal department of
any University they select, and if either of those entities agree with
Nigel Brooks in respect to his accusations about me, I will pay for
their services. HOWEVER, if those legal experts agree that my
rebuttals are correct and accurate, then Nigel Brooks and/or his
smear/hate/con gang members pay for the independent legal analysis.

Nigel Brooks and his gang members run, duck, hide, cower, piss their
pants, and snivel pathetic excuse after pathetic excuse to hide from
and refuse my hundreds of offers to take this issue to independent
legal experts. . . and the reason is obvious - they know they are
lying.

Please be advised further this article (the same as all of my past
articles and exchanges with posters) represents an editorial on
contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in this article
represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical fact, nor is
about, directed toward or against any particular person - other than
those specifically mentioned herein. This article is being posted for
entertainment purposes only. If any person finds this post personally
annoying, abusive, offensive, defaming or otherwise disturbing,
please notify me of your specific reasons for annoyance via email at
legal...@comcast.net.

If we find your detailed objections reasonable (considering the
"reasonable person" doctrine and case law) we will then remove this
post, or the offending passages contained therein, from the Google
archive, publicly apologize and retract.

My intent is to entertain, and to present articles to USENET readers
prior to publication to determine interest, and not to annoy, abuse,
humiliate, or in any way cause anyone emotional harm by posting on
USENET or elsewhere. Please also note that defending myself from
harassment and obloquy with rebuttal posts has been deemed a "lawful
and legitimate" publication by my legal counsel. If I am not attacked,
libeled, defamed or harassed, or my copyrighted articles not
interrupted nor infringed upon, I clearly do not have a reason to
respond with a rebuttal.

Please also note that I intend to notify any and all ISP's and web
hosts of any annoying or calumnious post, web site or other similar
entity about me after I give the offender an opportunity to retract,
apologize and remove said post from the Google archive.

SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER TWO: Considering the typical ridiculous,
absurd and obviously false claims about my military service that
originates from the crackpot smear and con gang that operates on
alt.war.Vietnam, I also hereby certify and attest this article is NOT
a secret coded message that only gang members can decode with their
secret Federal Agent/Sp4 draftee/former Junior Reserve Officer/ midget
decoder and mind reading rings.
This means the Brownie crackpots' inevitable accusations and howls
that this article is really me claiming in a special soothsaying code
(a code only crackpots et al smear gang can only read of course which
involves their typical claim the American Heritage Dictionary's
definition's of simple terms, such as "we" "estimated" "involved"
"retired from" and "not representing any biographical claim" are all
incorrect, and only their "special interpretations of the English
language can apply to all English terms I use, and of course the gang's
standard nonsensical mind reading and soothsaying claims that (1) I
was a CIA cross border assassin that sniper killed Ho Chi Minh,
HOORAH - (2) that I personally killed 1803 enemy soldiers in Vietnam
and then feasted on their bodies (burp) (3) that I was a secret member
of the Mi Lai massacre, (let God sort them out) that I hunted down and
murdered unarmed Priests (take that choir boy) (4) that I was trained
by the Martian Army on Mars, and I have green blood, and retractable
fangs (slurp), (5) that the movie "Rambo" was copied after my deeds in
Vietnam and I still live in caves in the northwest (6) and best of
all, I went to the Carlisle War College to study WWII tactics even
before I was born!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHHA.

Needless to say, the smear gang misrepresentations of my past posts
are of course, not true.

I have posted dozens of times on USENET that I will not post
autobiographical facts about my life on USENET in any detail. Only a
quip now and then. And, if anyone wants to know the true facts, or a
clarification of any quip, or more information and details about an
issue which are clearly missing in my quips they must first contact
me via email, identify themselves, and then I will determine if I want
to exchange such personal information with them.

Although the above is my standing offer, I should mention that NOT ONE
member of the gang has ever contacted me directly over any one of my
posts. It is clear the gang does not want to know about obvious
typos, errors, and occasional ambiguities, nor clarifications, nor
corrections, nor do they even want verification whether I was the
actual author of the post in question. (Note although the above
statement is as clear as it can be - some smear merchants have
deliberately *averted their eyes* from this key disclaimer paragraph
for years - and ridiculously attempted to claim did not include all
past, present and future posts in this disclaimer - which of course
clearly is a lie. But for their fraudulent benefit - I *again*
reiterate this disclaimer applies to all of my posts, exchanges and
USENET writings, past, present and future. I further reserve the
right to use any type of fiction, non-fiction, hyperbole,
autobiographical fiction, embellishments and quips in my writings as I
see fit, whenever I wish, and I will not be censored by smear/hate and
con gangs).

As experts on Investigations and the US Military have noted, the gang
leaders and their members clearly want to avoid the truth whenever it
contradicts their contrived and conspired defaming parsing and
fraudulent misrepresentations and distortions of what I have written
in the past, or contradicts their lies and fraud in respect to what is
and is not truly contained in my military records, and of course,
their fraudulent use of USENET posts they know others have written to
use to smear me, defame me, hold me up to public ridicule, stalk me,
and otherwise further their years' long demonizing and vilification
campaign they have been regularly waging against me.

In short, the gang does not want to know the truth, and they are
desperate to stop me from defending myself as they know my truthful
rebuttals, which they cannot defend as they know what I am posting is
true, reveal them for what they really are.

The gang's lies and fraud border on the pathological, and include the
gang' preposterous and goofy fraud that (7) a Purple Heart VA card is
the same as a Purple Heart Medal (I have posted on USENET dozens of
times I did not receive a Purple Heart Medal) (8) Nor that removing
hundreds of typos, errors, misstatements made by typists and I found
so far in about thirty-five THOUSAND extemporaneous posts under
accounts I used, and then replacing the errors with the true intended
context and meaning by the author is somehow "sinister" and the
original discarded post was the correct intended post and the
corrected version is false! (Giggle).
Such glaring preposterous crackpot et al smear and fraud gang claims
about me are, as usual, blatantly false and equally ridiculous. (Ask
the gang leaders for proof of their claims the next time they make
such ludicrous claims and watch them scurry for their rocks or produce
their own forgeries, or perhaps typos, errors and such that have long
been detected and discarded in my waste basket they have dug out of
that trash).

And regardless of forgeries and discarded posts found in my waste
basket that were thrown there because of an error or typist
misstatement by one of our typist's, I have posted about two dozen
times in the past that my time in South America was spent (other than
an assignment and short visit to Southern Command after I left
Vietnam) exclusively as a Civilian working for Montana Western Oil and
Gas or PCA, which evidence proving such was scanned and posted years
ago.
Also, in response to the smear gang's et al repeated and convenient
outright lie and fraud that I never said that others were using the
same accounts to post on USENET as I did until the smear gang leaders
started their fraud, con and smear campaign against me and thereby
forced me to post on this newsgroup to defend myself, please see the
following proof that of course the gang leaders et al have been caught
lying again:

http://tinyurl.com/6d4aay TYPISTS' GALORE POST proves there were about
71 previous posts prior to the gang's glaring lie that I never
mentioned others posting under the same accounts I used until after
the gang leaders started to use a few typos, errors and post fragments
written by many different people, years apart, never written on any
military forum, deceptively spliced together with forged words added
into or subtracted from the hodgepodge of different context post
fragments so as to fraudulently alter their meaning or context.

http://tinyurl.com/7kfaqz Experts on Smear Gangs reveal what the
Nigel Brooks con/hate and smear gang is all about.

http://tinyurl.com/bu3dwb Those that Label Others KOOKS suffer a
psychosis named EID say psychologists - and that so-called "Kook"
votes never occur outside of the smear gang.

http://tinyurl.com/5o59lr Nigel Brooks' lies about receiving medals
he never received, and lies about serving in war campaigns and in
reactionary forces long after he had already left active duty.

http://tinyurl.com/bxrf2b US Government Web Site and independent
Experts on the US Military confirm Nigel Brooks and many of his
smear/hate and con gang lied about my military service and my military
records. (This read is important as the gang is claiming that my
military records disproved or prove various things they have
fraudulently claimed about me. However, in truth we find those gang
accusations and claims to be nothing more than outright cons and
fraud. Brooks and Rau and other gang members have been lying about
the contents of my records for years. Above represents clear and
irrefutable proof of their fraud and false accusations.

http://tinyurl.com/ddogy4 Proof of just a few of Nigel Brooks
outright forgeries which he has used to fraudulently defame and smear
me - yes *forgeries* - fraud and deception from Nigel Brooks running
rampant.

http://tinyurl.com/otvaph

Purple Heart Defamation from the gang revealed and rebutted.
Irrefutable proof the gang has been using outright fraud, defamation
and forgeries to smear and defame in respect to this issue.

http://tinyurl.com/pomzo7 05/21/09
YET ANOTHER Investigator confirms the smear/hate gang lied about
Purple Heart medal claims. Also, all those times I said I did not
have a PH Medal, which the gang has been maliciously hiding.

Http://tinyurl.com/q6pk56 The smear/hate gang's fraudulent
accusation "I said I was a Hero" proved the fraud and lie it is: In
fact - I said the *exact opposite* as these several past posts clearly
prove. Once again the gang has been exposed lying about something
they have been forging and lying about for years. Hate and smear
gangs always attempt to paint their smear victims in a false and
defaming light - this is clearly the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and con
gang's purpose and mantra.

Here Nigel Brooks admits that he is not claiming I claimed I had a
purple heart medal - which contradicts not only Nigel Brooks
subsequent false accusations numbering in the hundreds, but including
his gang's fraud on this issue, it also contradicts similar fraud and
false accusations numbering in the *thousands!*

I said as the following URL clearly proves:

1http://tinyurl.com/y3yvb9 In this post I make it clear that I
referenced a Purple Heart Card and not a Purple Heart Medal - and the
difference between the two.

Nigel Brooks said:
2http://tinyurl.com/y3yvb9
In the above URL, Mr. Brooks also provided the following very clear
statement about this issue:

"He's doing the same now - by trying to insert the word "medal" into
the argument. Well no-one is accusing him of claiming to have had a
"Purple Heart Medal" - but the record shows he has claimed to have had
a Purple Heart **(VA service connected ID card)** and that he
received it in a real war. " (Emphasis added).

Obviously, Nigel Brooks above agreed and confirmed that I never said I
had a purple heart medal. Strange Nigel and his gang would
conveniently "forget" Nigel's conclusion about this issue after I
started proving they had lied about this issue all along - as the
above posts clearly prove?

Gang Preposterously Claims "Fiction" is "Lying."

When Brooks read my "shoot around little girl" or "shoot little girl"
post (for about the tenth time and counting) he said the following:

http://tinyurl.com/q9r9to May 22, 2009

"I would hazard a guess that the story is complete bullshit and that
Reiman never shot a 4 or 5 year old Vietnamese girl, otherwise
such an admission made in a public forum is astounding.

>>>> Nigel Brooks "

Then *after* I responded to Brooks (see URL above) and told him that
of course it was pure fiction just like my disclaimer states hundreds
of times. Brooks then reversed himself and wrote:
" he was in fact claiming that whilst he was in Vietnam he was >
forced to shoot a 4 or 5 year old Vietnamese child, who he claims was
attempting to kill him or his compatriots with an explosive device
concealed in a package of cigarettes.
>
> Now that is the logical interpretation of his post. In that post he
> says
> nothing about it being a fictional account or a debating method. The
> post
> stands by itself."

Nigel Brooks"

We all know, the WORLD knows, that when Fiction is used in any article
or prose it is NEVER identified as Fiction! Mark Twain even said
that Fiction has to be more believable than non-fiction or it loses
its effectiveness! According to Brainless Brooks, each time an author
uses Fiction to embellish or add interest to a story, he must tell
the reader in that same article he is using Fiction! This claim by BB
is about the most ridiculous, idiotic statement I have ever heard
about the use of Fiction, and it directly contradicts ALL authors,
prose instruction, and journalism 101 in every University in the
World!

So once again we have another Nigel Brooks arrogant first, now he is
claiming he knows more about writing Fiction than Mark Twain and all
Universities in the world!

I cannot decide if Nigel Brooks is arrogantly stupid, or just
arrogant? Or perhaps both? I will leave that decision up to the
readers.

http://tinyurl.com/madq65 In this post I point out that I have told
Nigel Brooks and his hate/con smear gang members *more than a thousand
times* (evidenced by Google archives) that I *DO NOT* post
autobiographical statements of fact on USENET - and if someone wants
to know whether what I post is Fiction, Non-Fiction, or whatever, they
*must contact me* and ask for more details.

I also posted that I DO NOT post autobiographical statements of facts
about myself on USENET as far back as 2001, and repeated that general
disclaimer statement in early 2003. Nigel Brooks and his smear/hate
con gang did not start their smear campaign against me until 2005,
*and Nigel Brooks and his gang even referenced and mentioned the post
in 2003 when I said I do not post autobiographical facts about me on
USENET - so they *knew* all along they were lying about the context
and meaning of quips they removed from my posts.

When an Author tells you MORE THAN A THOUSAND TIMES he is NOT posting
exclusively non-fiction on USENET, you would think that statement by
the author would resonate into even the pea brains of con men, smear
merchants and hate group leaders. Which of course it did as they
acknowledged this statement (Tom Rau whined and confirmed he read my
disclaimer more than 270 times) - but this fact had to be hidden by
such people so they could further their obviously fraudulent smear and
con defamation campaigns.

SELF ADMITTED AND SELF ACCLAIMED "TROLLS" OPERATE NIGEL BROOKS SMEAR
GANG'S MOST UNETHICAL FRAUD, SERIAL LYING AND CON MAN FALSE
ACCUSATIONS!

Many of the most vociferous and deceptive Nigel Brooks' key smear
gang members self-describe themselves as "Trolls."

These self-acclaimed and self-described *Trolls* have posted
hundreds of defaming statements and libel about me under those very
revealing Troll self-descriptions. (See alt.war.vietnam troll
section - you will find ALL of the self-described Trolls are connected
to Nigel Brooks and his gang's defamation and smear campaigns).

As just one example, here is the latest FBI forgery direct from a
Nigel Brooks smear/hate gang member that self-describes himself as a
"Troll." Note the gang member is again fraudulently using the name
of the FBI to smear and defame - which as we all know is a criminal
act.

It is obvious these Nigel Brooks smear/hate gang members will resort
to and use criminal acts to further the gang's smear and vilification
campaigns:

"Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.alt.net
From: Troll #351 <Leon...@sistine.va>
Newsgroups:
alt.war.vietnam,alt.politics,alt.news-media,alt.military,alt.military.retired,alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: That Second FBI Phone Transcript betwixt Mr.Doug Grant-tm
and the FBI
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:55:46 -0700"

Considering the self-description of these gang members as "Trolls" and
their propensity to use criminal acts (using the name of the FBI for
nefarious purposes is a criminal act - Federal and Brooks knows it)
to defame Nigel Brook's targeted hate/smear victim, can anyone out
there actually believe anything Nigel Brooks or any of his gang
members say about anyone?

If you do then you are admitting that you are de facto stating that
you believe people that are *telling you up front they are liars and
con men!* BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Question:

If you actually believe someone that is telling you up front that he
is lying to you, what would best describe you: (1) a moron (2) a
drooling moron (3) a member of the Nigel Brooks smear and con gang -
or perhaps all three?

Lawyers Speak "again"

All should know and be hereby informed that hate messages of any kind,
serial lying, fraud, libel, (which of course includes intentional and
malicious defamation and libel by omitting key facts) and other
publications of any kind will be recorded and used against the
perpetrator in a legal action. This is especially true for those
owners and participants in smear/hate web sites and hate newsgroups
which are used to further and facilitate hate and smear campaigns
against individuals.

Nigel Brooks -con man, hate gang leader and fraud merchant:

Starting in 2005 Nigel Brooks began waging a smear, libel and
defamation campaign against me. He said that he was "appointing
himself a judge over me" and proceeded to use fraud, false
accusations, outright serial lying, con man jargon and tactics, and
most of all, false light fraud by forging and distorting what he
claims I have said in the past. Nigel Brooks also claimed that he
wrote the US Army and received, via a FOIA request, copies of my
military records. After that con man attempt to add credibility to
his fraud and cons, he then claimed that my military records proved I
had lied about various duties I performed or experienced during my
military career.

It turns out that Nigel Brooks, a former two year-draftee that was
*forced* into the military and achieved the highest rank of Sp4, and
elected to take a Village Rat release from active duty in Vietnam, is
nothing more than a con man smear merchant that hates real Vietnam
Veterans, and has lied so often and so profusely about his military
service that he tries to divert attention to his cons and fraud by
falsely accusing real veterans of lying about their military service.
The only way Nigel Brooks, con man, can bolster his pathetic ego, and
divert attention from his pathetic and "forced" service in the US
Army, is by fraudulently denigrating and defaming real Veterans that
actually served in the regular army and volunteered for duties that
Nigel Brooks apparently hid and cowered from while he was serving in
Vietnam - like I said, he took a Village Rat discharge in Vietnam, and
all Vietnam Vets know what that means.

I have often asked Mr. Brooks to provide, or even name *a single
document* he claims exists in my military records that proves any of
his fraudulent and con man accusations he has posted about me in
respect to my military service. Nigel Brooks hides, runs, cowers and
ducks this challenge - he knows he is lying and conning, and he knows
he has been caught in mid con.

I have also often challenged Nigel Brooks to provide his claims about
me to any independent legal source, such as the American Association
of Arbitrators, or any University Law Department he chooses, and I
will provide same with my rebuttals to his fraud. If any of these
independent sources agree with Brooks that I lied about anything, I
will pay for the legal review, but if they agree that Brooks is using
false accusations, then Brooks pays for the legal review.

Nigel Brooks has cowered, hid, run, ducked, danced around, avoided and
lied about the above STANDING challenge for years. Nigel Brooks knows
that he will be exposed as perhaps the most prolific serial liar and
con man on the Internet if he accepts any of my challenges to get to
the truth.

The con man Nigel Brooks cannot be believed about anything. He uses
selective analysis, and then in true con man style tries to use his
past employment in the US Custom Service to provide credibility to his
cons, as he did the US Army. But in truth the US Custom Service does
not condone nor want anything to do with Nigel Brook's cons and fraud,
and neither does the US Army, and both have stated this fact to me in
no uncertain terms.

Whatever Nigel Brooks posts or says about someone typically cannot be
believed, and his demonizing and smearing those that point out his
perpetual use of fraud, forgeries and fraud is glaring and easily
proved.

End Disclaimer - Rebuttal Begins below:

******************************************************************************

Can Tho Gang Idioms - Rebuttal

http://tinyurl.com/d325zu This post is yet another example the smear
gang is not really interested in the truth about Vietnam Veterans.
They ignore the fact that officers that were in charge of after action
reports and news articles about battles testified in front of Congress
they were "ordered to lie in those reports!" That means all of the
newspaper accounts of battles are "bogus" as well as the after action
reports.

Nigel Brooks was not even in the US Army when I was assigned to Can
Tho, and he certainly was not present during the January 1969 attack
that I witnessed. Yet this smear merchant, who has been caught lying
about his and my military service, claims that I did not see what I
saw! Moreover, Brooks cites some "News account" as evidence of his
preposterous "mind reading claim" which we all know were mostly
fraudulent as the authors of those news accounts have testified and
confirmed in front of Congress. (See above).

First, consider the complete idiocy of Nigel Brooks' false accusation
that although he admits I was present for the 1969 attack on Can Tho,
Brooks fraudulently claims I actually was describing a lesser attack
that occurred about a year earlier - long before I arrived in Can Tho!

So why in the hell would I want to do that??? Brooks incredibly wants
us all to believe that although I did witness a very major attack, I
refused to describe what I actually witnessed, and instead, described
something that happened a year earlier that I *did not*
witness??????BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Nigel Brooks'
incredible, convoluted bullshit is so goofy, idiotic, strange, and
drooling mad, I am surprised he had the balls to post this obviously
preposterous false accusation in the first place!

There is no logical reason whatsoever that would compel me (or anyone
else for that matter) after witnessing a very major attack on the very
base which I was assigned, to refuse to describe that attack, and
instead, describe a lesser attack that occurred when I was not even
there! BWHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Note Brooks had to claim I was describing a different attack so he
could save face in respect to his and his gang's initial claim that I
never witnessed any attack in Can Tho. When my records proved I was
in Can Tho during the 1969 attack, Brooks and gang started their
dancing and conning about this issue -headed with the preposterous and
bizarre claim that I described a battle I never saw, while refusing to
describe a much more deadly and lengthy battle they admit I did see!
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Who in the hell would do that? And why in
the hell would anyone want to do that? Brooks' claims about me are
about the most idiotic claims I have ever heard in my entire life.

I am sorry for laughing, but you gotta admit, this Brooks and his hate
gang are about the dumbest, moronic drooling idiots I have ever had
the misfortune to encounter - NO ONE in their right mind would believe
the outrageous fraud Brooks is trying to sell in respect to this
issue - NO ONE! BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Sorry, but each time I think of
what Brooks is trying to pan off as truth, I just need to laugh.

Here are *volumes* of evidence Nigel Brooks has been caught in mid
smear and con once again over an issue dealing with me:

Out of the Gate Brooks Lies

Question: How could Nigel Brooks know what I saw? How could he know
what I was thinking at the time? Answer: He could not, he cannot read
minds regardless of how many times this fool references that Crystal
ball he seems to have shoved up his ass.

In short, Nigel Brooks is a con man, fraud and smear merchant. He
operates with a hate/ smear gang and they jump and do his fraud and
smear bidding at his beck and call. But in this case, they are making
as big a fool out of themselves as Brooks seems to do on a regular
basis.

Nigel Brooks' Can Tho Con and BS Examined:

1. Nigel Brooks claims the version of the 1967 and 1969 attacks on
Can Tho, that he found in some newspaper, (which the authors of those
newspaper articles told Congress they were mostly lies) is the *only*
correct version of the attack on Can Tho in 1967, and is the only
correct version of the 1969 attack when I was there. Can you imagine
anyone foolish enough to make such a idiotic and preposterous claim?

We all know that multiple eye witnesses to such an event will see
different things during a time of confusion and battle, depending upon
their vantage point and their personal involvement.

Someone standing guard on the Air Field, as an example, might see the
battle unfold completely different than someone watching the battle
from a distance as I did. We all know this is true by all the
publications *real* investigators have published stating that even in
traffic accidents or other violent events the *real* investigators can
rarely find two witnesses that agree on the details of the accident or
traumatic event, especially when it involves a battle in a war zone!

2. Nigel Brooks repeatedly claims to have been a US Custom Worker for
thirty years - and he often attempts to use his past employment as
some basis for his fraud and false accusations. Yet even with 30
years of Custom Work he apparently does not know that witnesses to a
battle or traumatic event *will see that battle or event from
different perspectives, and there is NOT nor never is a single
correct version that would be all encompassing? Some "Custom
Worker" no wonder our borders are porous - imagine - working for the
Custom Service for 30 years and still *not knowing* that witnesses see
events differently - especially when they witness something from
different vantage points. Apparently, Mr. Brooks investigated how to
shuffle paper from one side of his desk to the other. NO ONE is that
stupid!

Either Nigel Books was a piss poor Custom Worker, or he is attempting
to con the readers of this forum into believing the ONLY version of
what happened during those two attacks is the "Nigel Brooks" version!
Mr. Brooks deliberate fraud and con in this respect is obvious to any
rational person. There is NO single version that will encompass what
all eye witnesses saw and experienced, especially one coming from
newspaper accounts that we already know are false! (The authors of
the newspaper articles and after action reports testified in front of
Congress they were ordered to lie in those accounts - and the accounts
were more analogous to propaganda than they were to the truth. If you
were in Vietnam, and you were ever out on a combat patrol, and then
you read an account of that combat, you would already know they were
lying in those accounts). (See the URL below for more information in
this regard).

3. In Nigel Brook's "version" of the 1967 and the 1969 attacks, Nigel
Brooks *did not even know about* the attack on the Can Tho POW camp!
He does not even mention it! Why? Because those newspaper accounts
he dug up could not mention that attack because the POW camp's
location was classified, and NOTHING was printed in any newspaper
about that element of the January 1969 attack. You had to be there to
see it. I was there, Brooks admits I was there, and Brooks, of course,
was NOT there!

4. In Nigel Brook's version of the attack in 1969 (1) there were no
vehicles involved in any manner in the battle, and (2) the only and
exclusive weapons the VC used were Satchel Charges. Yet as we see
from other eyewitnesses to that battle presented below, there *were*
vehicles involved in the 1969 attack that I witnessed, and the VC were
using all kinds of weapons and not just satchel charges. I said it
looked like they were firing M-79's at the Choppers from my vantage
point, but I found out later they were using M-79's and B40 rockets,
and AK's and satchel charges, and probably other weapons as well. All
those facts from eye witnesses directly dispute and prove false Nigel
Brook's version of events that night, and no wonder, because as usual,
Nigel Brooks was not there, and I was.

5. Also note the accounts by the other eye witnesses below are very
different from each other's accounts. Each different eye witness
apparently saw the battle unfold differently than the other - which of
course is common as we all know eye witnesses to a battle, accident,
murder, or other traumatic events ALWAYS see events differently
depending upon their personal vantage points to the event, and of
course their personal involvement.

So which version is *absolutely true?* The only thing we can be
positive about in that regard is the Nigel Brooks' version of the 1969
or the 1967 attack on Can Tho is absolutely not true!

The eye witnesses to the 1969 battle confirm there *were* vehicles
involved which directly contradict Nigel Brooks, and the enemy also
used many different weapons, and not just satchel charges like Brooks
claimed. Further eye witnesses also saw the attack on the POW camp
which involved at least *two* enemy vehicles (probably ARVN
ambulances). But Nigel Brooks *did not even know about that POW camp
element of the 1969 attack!* It just was not in his newspaper - so
Brooks did not know about it. Which of course, immediately makes
Brooks version - bullshit.

So is Nigel Brooks' claim that his ridiculous version of the 1967 and
1969 attacks, which does not even mention the attack on the POW camp,
is the only correct version of what happened during those battles?
Duh, if you believe that I am sure the Brooks gang has some Bridges to
sell you in New York city.

Here are what other eye witnesses to those Can Tho battles have to
say about them, and below them, I have again presented what I said
about the attack I did witness. Any claim that I did not see what I
know I did is nothing more than just more con man fraud and defamation
from Nigel Brooks - typical of him and his gang. (Here is a bulletin
for the gang - BROOKS CANNOT READ MINDS! I have tested Brooks several
times in this respect and he has failed every test).

6. Nigel Brooks said the 1967 attack involved ambulances - but this
eye witness said the VC were attacking the airfield exclusively on
foot. So how can my sight of vehicles involved in the 1969 attack be
incorrect because according to Brooks the only vehicles ever involved
in any attack on Can Tho was in 1967 and not during the time I
witnessed the attack in 1969? Of course, Brooks is full of it as
usual.

Can Tho attack 1967 no vehicles, VC on foot:

http://tinyurl.com/ydddq2

2. This eye witness remembers vehicles involved in the 1969 attack -
which Brooks claims did not exist. Are *all* eye witnesses to the
1969 attack lying and only Nigel Brooks, con man, is the truth
teller? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

http://tinyurl.com/ygwnvt This witness remembers ambulances in the
1969 attack.

3.
http://tinyurl.com/ydpsna This eye witness remembers the Can Tho
attack completely different than what Nigel Brooks has attempted to
claim happened during that attack. Brooks was not there, this trooper
was. Only a complete moron would believe Nigel Brooks' "version" of
the 1967 attack, and further, also believe his version of the 1969
attack which I witnessed and know Brooks version is wrong and
incomplete.

Nigel Brooks is delivering only a single version of the 1969 attack,
and we all know there are many other versions that are also accurate,
especially when you add the fact ol Brooks did not even know about the
attack on the POW camp that was located at the end of the runway, and
of course us eye witlessness did watch that POW attack unfold.

Brooks Lies are to CYA

Consider also, after Brooks said I was lying about the Can Tho attack
then my records proved I was at Can Tho during the January 1969
attack. Desperate to CYA, Nigel Brooks and some of his pathetic gang
members then tried to claim my description of an attack *I had* to
experience and witness because I was assigned to Can Tho at the time,
was false, and in fact I was describing an attack that occurred long
before I arrived in Vietnam! Obviously, Nigel Brooks knows he was
caught in mid con by first claiming I was never in Can Tho during any
attack, and his latter fraud is just Brooks compounding his initial
fraud with illogical and ridiculous claims that *although I was
located in Can Tho when a major attack occurred, I actually described
a lesser attack that occurred a year earlier when I was not even
there!* NOW WHY ON EARTH WOULD I DO THAT!

There is absolutely no reason, no logic nor compelling reason why I
would describe a lesser attack a year earlier, while not describing an
attack that I clearly witnessed that was much worse than the previous
attack! Brooks is, in my opinion, at best, nuts to expect rational
people to believe such illogical and goofy Bullshit.

Note also the above Can Tho witness to the 1967 attack describes it
completely different from Nigel Brook's version, and the witness even
mentions the POW camp which was also one of the main targets during
the January 1969 attack which I witnessed. The VC used vehicles to
attack the airfield, then they moved those vehicles to the POW camp,
and when they could not overcome the POW camp at least one of those
vehicles went back out of the gate.

Meanwhile, there were several other sappers that were attacking the
airfield. Brooks initially claimed the VC during the 1969 attack only
carried satchel charges, then when I pointed out he was lying, he
changed his story to satchel charges AND B40'S! Brooks lies, and lies
and lies, and his utterly ridiculous claim that I would describe an
attack that occurred before I arrived in Can Tho, while Brooks admits
that I had to witness a much worse attack in 1969 when I was assigned
to Can Tho, is about the most idiotic, illogical and goofy claim I
have ever heard, even from someone as unethical and stupid as Nigel
Brooks and his smear gang.

http://tinyurl.com/y5qeh5 This eyewitness and PH medal (medal not the
VA card) recipient received due to the Can Tho battle *clearly*
proves there were vehicles involved in the attack. Nigel Brooks said
the 1969 attack did not involve *any* vehicles. Brooks clearly lied.
Moreover this Vet is suffering from Agent Orange inflictions, which
Tom Rau (a Nigel Brooks gang leader) said were all fakes and obese
slugs.

5.
http://tinyurl.com/da9xup This eye witness to the battle said he saw
fire coming from various places and it took hours to run down all of
the VC. This first hand account hardly fits the description of the
battle Brooks is trying to con the readers into believing. I was
there, Brooks was not. To rational people that should be the end of
it. But to con men, they just seem to not realize when their con has
been exposed and they are desperate to try and save face. Does Brooks
have any face left to save?
6.
http://tinyurl.com/yagbwu This eye witness to the Can Tho attack
describes a truck that was hit on the airfield, and B40 rockets being
used by the enemy. But, But Nigel Brooks said there were *no*
vehicles involved in the attack, and the VC only used satchel
charges! This guy was there, Brooks was not, I was there Brooks was
not, I saw vehicles, the other witnesses also saw vehicles, Brooks is
lying and conning the readers again with his standard BS and
fraudulent claim there can be only *one* correct version of a major
attack like the one I witnessed in 1969 in Can Tho.
7.
http://tinyurl.com/t4m85 This Can Tho attack eye witness is
describing what happened during the 1967 attack long before I arrived.
He says the VC used hand grenades tied with rubber bands. Brooks said
they *only* used satchel charges. Brooks also lied about the
vehicles involved in respect to the 1969 attack that I witnessed. My
description of the VC driving down the runway and firing M-79's (or
B40's) certainly is completely different from what happened during
the 1967 attack, which Brooks is fraudulently claiming I was
describing. (Note the eye witness to the 1967 attack version is
completely different from my description of the 1969 attack). My
memory is of VC vehicles driving down the runway firing either M-79's
or B40's at the Choppers, and then heading for an assault on the POW
camp, where the VC vehicles stopped and entered into a major fire
fight with the ARVN's and MP's at the POW camp. I was told by an MP
the next day that one of more of those enemy vehicles later escaped
out of the gate. I was too far away to see any Red Crosses on the
side of the VC Vehicles, but I was told by an MP the next day the VC
had probably used ambulances again, but in truth those vehicles could
have been any type of vehicles - I was too far away to know exactly
what type of vehicles they were, only that they were, in fact,
vehicles.

Again, Brooks does not even *mention* the POW camp assault, nor how it
occurred, nor what vehicles or weapons were used in the attack on the
POW camp! This pathetic fool did not even know anything about that
attack! Moreover, it is *impossible* to attack the POW camp with only
sappers. It can only be attacked from the Can Tho runaway by vehicles
as the POW camp was located at the very end of the airfield, and was
completely defended with claymores, towers, wire, and trenches. The
only way the VC could have attacked the POW camp from the airfield is
with vehicles and heavy weapons.
8.
http://tinyurl.com/ye3bof This eye witness is confirming the January
1969 attack occurred when I was assigned to Can Tho. Since I clearly
was there, that was the only attack I could have possibly been
describing and remembering. Nigel Brooks idiotic claims that I
described an attack that occurred before I arrived in Can Tho is
beyond illogical and stupid. Brooks also hides, ducks, ignores, runs
from, the mere fact that I was present during a much worse attack in
1969 than the earlier one in 1967, and the attack that I witnessed was
the one I clearly was describing. Nigel Brooks had to make up his
preposterous con because long before my records confirmed I was
assigned to Can Tho during the 1969 attack, Brooks and his smear gang
lied to the readers and said I was never in Can Tho during *any*
attack!

Brooks was caught in mid con when I proved I was in fact in Can Tho
during the 1969 attack. So that is why I believe he conjured up the
illogical BS that I was describing a lesser attack a year earlier than
the one I actually had to experience. However, my description of
the 1969 attack DOES NOT CONFORM to any of the eye witness accounts
of that earlier 1967 attack - so either Nigel Brooks has been caught
in mid con yet again, or all of these eye witness Vets to these
attacks are lying. Pick one.

Also, the logic behind someone describing a lesser attack that
occurred when he was not in the area, and NOT describing the more
involved and more major attack that he actually did witness, is beyond
belief by anyone with an IQ above "6." There is no possible reason
why anyone would do what Nigel Brooks and his gang are claiming I did.

9.
http://tinyurl.com/y45m4w This eye witness to the January 1969 attack
which I described mentions there was a tremendous amount of confusion
during the attack. No shit! Ergo, Nigel Brooks' goofy claim that
his version of that attack is complete, correct and the only version
that is accurate is about as ridiculous as it comes.

I doubt if you organized five different eye witlessness to that attack
together they would all remember the same details of the attack. So
Nigel Brooks con that *everyone* must remember that attack precisely
how the newspaper article described it, (even considering the authors
of those newspaper accounts testified before Congress they were
ordered to lie in those accounts - and the fact the Newspaper account
does not even mention the attack on the POW camp) is beyond con man
BS, it is outright fraud.

Not to mention the false newspaper account Brooks likes to reference
*could not even mention* the attack on the POW camp due to all POW
camps in Vietnam being classified. The way I remember the 1969
attacks was the VC used their vehicles to drive down the runway,
firing at the Choppers, and then arrived at the end of the run way to
attack the POW camp. Pathetic Brooks did not even *know* about the
attack on the POW camp until I told him about it, and we also note an
eye witness presented above to the 1969 attack *ALSO* mentions the POW
camp.

Nigel Brooks obviously does not have a clue about what he is posting
about this attack, and his gang echoing Brooks fraud and lies are
worse -Ward Attendants were not in Can Tho either when the 1969 attack
occurred so how in the hell would they know what I saw??? Mind
reading? Crystal ball up ass? Obviously, we are dealing with con men
and smear merchants when it comes to Nigel Brooks and some members of
his smear gang.
10.

http://tinyurl.com/cvhuq3 This is another eye witness that remembers
an attack on the POW camp at Can Tho -which Brooks clearly knew
nothing about. He also is suffering Agent Orange related maladies,
you know, those people that Tom Rau called "obese slugs and another
Nigel Brooks gang member claimed such vets were manipulating the VA."
I guess this guy's family might disagree with the Nigel Brooks gang
about the effects of Agent Orange. I know I do.

Summary:

So if Nigel Brooks did not even know about the attack on the POW camp,
how could he claim I was not describing it correctly? And considering
all of the confusion and chaos during the attack I witnessed, can
Brooks' "newspaper" version be the only correct version of that
attack? Of course not.

Nigel Brooks' absence of knowledge about the use of the VC vehicles
during the 1969 attack on the airfield, and on the POW camp, and his
lack of knowledge about the weapons and tactics the enemy used,
clearly proves that Nigel Brooks is lying in respect to Brooks' claim
that his newspaper versions of the attacks are the only true and
correct versions of the 1969 and 1967 attacks on Can Tho. Moreover,
Clown Brooks s claiming he knows more about what I saw than I do, and
he was not even there and I was!

Not to mention Sp4 Nigel Brooks and his Sp4 clown gang are
contradicting several other eye witnesses to both the 1967 and the
1969 attacks on Can Tho.

So do you believe Nigel Brooks and gang have been caught in mid con
YET AGAIN!!!??? Of course they have.

Below is an URL presenting my post on what I saw that night. I stand
behind it completely, and it is *my* memory that is at work here, and
Nigel Brooks, nor any of his gang members, as usual, were not even
there.

http://tinyurl.com/delrhr Expose Nigel Brooks "heresay" about the Can
Tho attack - which of course is completely contradicted by the actual
eye witnesses to the attacks. I also provide evidence of the authors
of the newspaper accounts Brooks uses to support his "version"
stating in front of Congress "they were ordered to lie in those
accounts." I also point out in this post that Nigel Brooks lied
about my assignment to the 51st Maintenance Company while I was
assigned to Can Tho. I never, NOT ONCE, ever worked in or for a
"maintenance company" in my entire military career.

Also note the nearest personnel office to my Can Tho duty station was
more than 300 miles away. Obviously, I could not have been operating
as a "personnel sergeant" exclusively while I was assigned to Can Tho
as Nigel Brooks has also been fraudulently claiming for years.

http://tinyurl.com/d4zx6e Here is precisely what I saw and when I saw
it, in much more detail. I posted this on May 5, 2008, about a year
ago, and still Nigel Brooks is lying about this issue. He and his
gang also claim that whenever I "add details or clarify" anything I
have ever said I am "altering or changing" what I said. Yet I see ol
Nigel and gang members adding details and clarifying all kinds of
things in their previous posts - oh well, we all know this gang is
completely dishonest and I should not need to point out the gang's
hypocrisy as well as their fraud - I am sure those that have been
reading my truthful rebuttals already know all about the ethics of
Nigel Brooks and his gang.

I have better things to do than to rebut Nigel Brooks fraud and cons
about me, but as long as he and his gang keep posting their false
accusations and fraud about me, expect me to defend myself with the
truth until the cows come home.

Doug Grant (Tm)

>
>
>

[DGVREIMAN]

"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message

news:c9loj5hosh49vvhen...@4ax.com...

Mr. McDonnell, you are a lying. The mortar excerpt above was not
posted in respect to any Can Tho attack. You have been caught lying
yet again. If you disagree post the URL so we can all read the entire
post. You have "forged" this Mortar excerpt into what you claimed I
said about Can Tho, and we both know that is a complete fraud and
forgery. Here is precisely what I said about Can Tho, and what I
witnessed there. You were not there. You were a Ward Attendant in
some Hospital unit, and what the hell do you know about what I and
several other witnesses below confirms I saw? I am sure that is an
easy question for you to answer, and please retract your fraud about
this issue and apologize at once:

[Mac]

On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 20:00:09 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

>Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell: I have provided you with the means to obtain
>all information below. Also, why are you afraid to answer the
>question in respect to if you refused to call back or talk to a
>Federal Investigator when he contacted you?
__________________________
You claim that a "Federal Investigator" contacted me.
I have already answered you.
I stated that you were lying.
Either that, or the person telling you that, is lying.
Given your posting history, and given some of your other claims
regarding other veterans, it is fairly easy to decide....

As for that alleged URL: it simply points to one of your WebPages
wherein you provide no proof, no evidence, no documentation.

All that is there is a copy of the screed you spam to multiple
newsgroups, multiple times.
-Mac, the Medic

[Mac]

On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:03:33 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

CanTho airfield attack with ambulances....

Back in OCTOBER, 2001 this Doug Grant claimed he observed the
following attack on CanTho... with "ambulances";

A slight problem.

The attack with ambulances took place MONTHS before he arrived in
Vietnam.
The airfield was again attacked in January, 1969 but without the
ambulances.
By that time he was in Vietnam.

Here is what he posted: you can figure his intent, given his posting
history and antics....

============

Newsgroups: alt.security.terrorism, alt.terrorism.world-trade-center
From: "DOUGLAS G.V. REIMAN" <dggr...@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 22:14:01 GMT
Local: Sat, Oct 6 2001 3:14�pm
Subject: TERROR FIGHTS BACK

When I was in Vietnam, stationed in Can Tho, I witnessed two
ambulances drive through our main gate, calmly drive to our
airport, drive on the tarmac and while driving down the tarmac
Viet Cong contained in the ambulances shot each plane on the
tarmac with a M-79 grenade launcher. �Then when they were
through, they simply drove out the back gate and down the road.
This was a "drive-by" on an airport!
�These six or seven Viet Cong, equipped with simple weapons (that
look like big shotguns) destroyed an entire American Army air
base in about five minutes!
..... SNIP ....
The Viet Cong were also experts with mortars. �They would steal
trucks, and while driving down a road fire several mortar rounds
from those moving trucks all at different altitudes. �By firing
in this manner the mortar rounds would all fall in the same

general area within about ten seconds of each other. �

[Mac]

On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:03:33 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

>Mr. McDonnell, you are a lying. The mortar excerpt above was not
>posted in respect to any Can Tho attack. You have been caught lying
>yet again. If you disagree post the URL so we can all read the entire
>post. You have "forged" this Mortar excerpt into what you claimed I

>said about Can Tho...

Really ??
All right, seeing as you seem to have some inordinate difficulties, I
will post that again.
Please note that I am including the HEADERS.
The date, the Subject, the title of the subject, and the newsgroups
are listed --- that should help you and any others track your posting
down and ascertain what you stated.

And then, comparing that to CanTho and which attack featured the
ambulances....

HERE YOU GO - - - - -

CanTho airfield attack with ambulances....

Back in OCTOBER, 2001 this Doug Grant claimed he observed the
following attack on CanTho... with "ambulances";

A slight problem.

The attack with ambulances took place MONTHS before he arrived in
Vietnam.
The airfield was again attacked in January, 1969 but without the
ambulances.
By that time he was in Vietnam.

Newsgroups: alt.security.terrorism, alt.terrorism.world-trade-center
From: "DOUGLAS G.V. REIMAN" <dggr...@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 22:14:01 GMT
Local: Sat, Oct 6 2001 3:14�pm
Subject: TERROR FIGHTS BACK

When I was in Vietnam, stationed in Can Tho, I witnessed two
ambulances drive through our main gate, calmly drive to our
airport, drive on the tarmac and while driving down the tarmac
Viet Cong contained in the ambulances shot each plane on the
tarmac with a M-79 grenade launcher. �Then when they were
through, they simply drove out the back gate and down the road.
This was a "drive-by" on an airport!
�These six or seven Viet Cong, equipped with simple weapons (that
look like big shotguns) destroyed an entire American Army air
base in about five minutes!
..... SNIP ....
The Viet Cong were also experts with mortars. �They would steal
trucks, and while driving down a road fire several mortar rounds
from those moving trucks all at different altitudes. �By firing
in this manner the mortar rounds would all fall in the same

[Mac]

On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 11:56:56 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

CanTho airfield attack with ambulances....

Back in OCTOBER, 2001 this Doug Grant claimed he observed the
following attack on CanTho... with "ambulances";

A slight problem.

The attack with ambulances took place MONTHS before he arrived in
Vietnam.
The airfield was again attacked in January, 1969 but without the
ambulances.
By that time he was in Vietnam.

[tankfixer]

In article <6carj55jhj7lq62cv...@4ax.com>,
NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net says...

>
> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 20:00:09 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell: I have provided you with the means to obtain
> >all information below. Also, why are you afraid to answer the
> >question in respect to if you refused to call back or talk to a
> >Federal Investigator when he contacted you?
> __________________________
> You claim that a "Federal Investigator" contacted me.

Shoot Mac, he won't even state what federal agency is doing any
investigation..

> I have already answered you.
> I stated that you were lying.

It suprises you that Doug lies ?

> Either that, or the person telling you that, is lying.
> Given your posting history, and given some of your other claims
> regarding other veterans, it is fairly easy to decide....
>
> As for that alleged URL: it simply points to one of your WebPages
> wherein you provide no proof, no evidence, no documentation.
>
> All that is there is a copy of the screed you spam to multiple
> newsgroups, multiple times.

He must be pushing his ISP's TOS again with the spam and huge 1000+ line
posts to text newsgroups...

[!DGVREIMAN]

"tankfixer" <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.25a7566...@news.bytemine.net...

> In article <6carj55jhj7lq62cv...@4ax.com>,
> NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net says...
>>
>> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 20:00:09 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
>> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>> >Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell: I have provided you with the means to obtain
>> >all information below. Also, why are you afraid to answer the
>> >question in respect to if you refused to call back or talk to a
>> >Federal Investigator when he contacted you?
>> __________________________
>> You claim that a "Federal Investigator" contacted me.
>
> Shoot Mac, he won't even state what federal agency is doing any
> investigation..
>

does the Salvation Army count?

>
>> I have already answered you.
>> I stated that you were lying.
>
> It suprises you that Doug lies ?
>

it surprises me he can stand straight up

>> Either that, or the person telling you that, is lying.
>> Given your posting history, and given some of your other claims
>> regarding other veterans, it is fairly easy to decide....
>>
>> As for that alleged URL: it simply points to one of your WebPages
>> wherein you provide no proof, no evidence, no documentation.
>>
>> All that is there is a copy of the screed you spam to multiple
>> newsgroups, multiple times.
>
> He must be pushing his ISP's TOS again with the spam and huge 1000+ line
> posts to text newsgroups...

you notice how he has to catch his breath between these explosions of
yammering. to quote the great Yekim, "it is to larf"

[Mac]

On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:22:36 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

Draw your own conclusions as to the mental make-up of the person who
would spew forth the following in a debate/conversation with another
person.
=============

From: "DGVREIMAN" <dggr...@worldnet.att.net
Newsgroups:

alt.news-media,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.politics.usa.congress,alt.security.terrorism
References:
<Dflp8.13307$se.13...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net
<uabpeks...@corp.supernews.com
<4hmp8.13400$se.13...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net
<3CA62E0D...@exploratoire.ch
<IYtp8.14415$Eb5.1...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net
<3CA82636...@exploratoire.ch
Subject: Re: Arafat Refuses Land Back
Lines: 300

Message-ID:
<g80q8.17599$se.16...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 16:45:00 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.82.130.222
X-Complaints-To: ab...@worldnet.att.net
X-Trace: bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1017679500 12.82.130.222
(Mon, 01 Apr 2002 16:45:00 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 16:45:00 GMT
Organization: AT&T Worldnet

Doug Says:
Colin, you have not seen such films unless they were produced for
propaganda purposes.
When I was in Vietnam little children were given toe poppers (small
mines) hidden in cigarette packages, then they were told by the
Communists to give this nice gift to the American GI's as they passed
by their village.
I will never forget the day when a little smiling girl no more than 4
or 5 years old started walking towards me trying to give me a pack of
cigarettes.
I was forced to shoot her.

**********************************
It is nice to know that you have never forgotten the day when you shot
that little girl !!

NOTE the differences.
In APRIL, 2002 you clearly state:
"I was forced to shoot her."

Once you have been challenged on the above bullshit, on June 6th,
2009, you now desperately try claiming:
"... about shooting around a little girl in
Vietnam to make a point about how the
Commie Vietnamese used little children
to murder..."

SEVEN years later you try to insert that little preposition of
"around" --- instead of your former declarative statement that you
had been "...forced to shoot her."

So, when are you proceeding with that lawsuit?
You know, the one you have been threatening everyone with for YEARS
and YEARS....
-Mac, the Medic

[DGVREIMAN]

"Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:7q455j...@mid.individual.net...

Path:
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.karotte.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.war.vietnam,alt.military,alt.military.retired,alt.news-media
Subject: Re: Lycos URL and Attorney General Request ( was Re: reiman
posting cake farts?
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 11:26:08 -0600
Lines: 144
Message-ID: <7q455j...@mid.individual.net>
References: <hh0qr8$n90$1...@news.eternal-september.org>
<MPG.259e09b...@news.bytemine.net>
<CKSdnTwz7uGZ86nW...@giganews.com>
<20gbj5h6q5niq5gpb...@4ax.com>
<RZKdnQFuP6K-mafW...@giganews.com>
<dqtkj51fq5nqunchs...@4ax.com>
<r86dnYoWSe2_UqfW...@giganews.com>
<t65mj55tbv6einh1r...@4ax.com>
<QZednYZSKrL-2qHW...@giganews.com>
<bnloj5lb0tiqtl3gh...@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net
WbznlDOs4VoW4MMTv8mURgsrRDZH/+SBsmCmzm0JsHTY4Uzro=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:z5HTQWdYcDn3SPE6WFx8cARG9DM=
In-Reply-To: <bnloj5lb0tiqtl3gh...@4ax.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8089.726
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8089.726
Bytes: 8561
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.news-media:290334
alt.military.retired:462588 alt.military:462743 alt.war.vietnam:765911

>
> As most are aware, I consigned the loonytune to my killfile many
> moons ago. I therefore never see anything he posts in this forum
> unless he is replied to. I refuse to communicate with him directly
> as I am convinced it only would serve to acerbate his obviously
> deteriorating mental condition. This ridiculous argument has been
> going on now for three months shy of five years.

Doug's Rebuttal: Obviously, you do not know how a killfile functions,
or you are hiding from my rebuttals because you know you cannot refute
them, which is more likely the case.

>
> I have reviewed the documentary and historical evidence, compared it
> to his past usenet braggadocio and have made my conclusions. I am
> firm in my conviction that my original opinion of him was correct.
> The proof is all there and can easily be confirmed by anyone who
> cares to take the time to research the braggadocio claims of the
> past, and compare those claims to the actual records.

Doug's Rebuttal: Is that why each time I ask you to produce any
document you claim exists in my records, or even name one, that
disproves any statement of fact I have ever made, you run hide, duck,
use a killfile, piss your panties and cower in corner? We both know
you cannot produce any contradicting documents that proves your
fraud, and we both know when I demanded you produce or even name one
that is when you suddenly decided not to respond to my rebuttals of
your fraud - you knew you were caught in mid con.

http://tinyurl.com/ygy52yg Smear Merchant Disclaimer which applies to
this post:

I have better things to do than being forced to defend myself from the
malicious and fraudulent Nigel Brooks hate/smear/con gang attacks that
have surfaced recently due to me posting that Google had said the key
gang members were lying when they said that Google reinstated my long
erred, typo or ambiguous posts I had removed and the gang resurrected
from my waste basket.

There is something about third parties proving these gang members
liars that motivates them to trot out their typical threats, fraud and
false accusations.

Doug's Rebuttal: Mr. Brooks, the only reason is that Google has not
served you yet - but it will I assure you.

>
> I have no knowledge of the identity or any law enforcement agency or
> individual purported to be involved, and I have never read any
> letter purporting to be from Reiman's attorney to the United States
> Attorney.

Doug's Rebuttal: The letter from my law firm (which you claimed did
not exist) to the US Attorney, is attached to the complaint to Google
and Lycos as an exhibit. No doubt you will read it. Are you
claiming that you never received any of my private medical information
or posted any which you received from one of your "associates?"
Please stop lying Brooks.

>
> I'd be interested to hear specifically what legal theory would allow
> either Google or Lycos to require any individual not party to a
> lawsuit, to furnish a statement under oath, or even respond.

Doug's Rebuttal: Mr. Brooks, your past statements indicate you know
very little about the law. This is yet another example.
You WILL be required to respond under oath, when you do you will be
sued in a court of law within two weeks.

> That being said, considering the fact that Reiman is claiming I have
> knowledge of such communications, I invite him to post proof of
> that claim in this forum. I invite him to specifically identify the
> law enforcement agency involved in this bizarre proceeding, and I
> invite him to publish any communication he has received from Lycos,
> Google, law enforcement etc in this regard. As I am apparently a
> party to this phantom action - I give my permission to Reiman to
> publish the communications.

Doug's Rebuttal: Mr. Brooks I have already published the recent email
I received from the Google Legal Team that clearly proves you lied
through your teeth about Google being responsible for dredging up
discarded posts from my waste basket and then claiming I posted them.
After they were removed, the person responsible for dredging them up
and re-posting them on USENET was not Google as you claim, but was
clearly a member of your hate/smear and con gang. No wonder you
attempted to hide that fact with your now obvious fraud and false
statements - how else could you hide the fact you knew you were
dealing with posts that were long discarded due to a typo, error, and
clearly these typos and errors were being exploited by you and your
gang for the pupose of obolquy, fraud, false accusations, libel,
harassment and libel.

Here is the post in which I have reproduced the Google legal team
email:

After I posted the following proof that Nigel Brooks had been caught
lying by Google, and Google's legal team had verified that fact, Mr.

Mac the Medic started posting his typical defamation and false
accusation "mind reading based" smear routines.

Here is what I posted in respect to Google, which contains nothing
but the truth and the facts: (Note a copy of an email I received from

Google's legal team is included - if you want more details about this
post all you need to do is email me, verify your identity and request
it.)

http://tinyurl.com/ykw4b8u Nigel Brooks served by Google and Lycos.

>

> In the highly unlikely event that I am contacted by anyone
> purporting to represent Reiman my standard answer applies - Arkell
> v. Pressdram.
>
> Interested readers of this forum may rest assured that if I receive
> any communication whatsoever from law enforcement, Lycos, Google, or
> any claiming to represent Reiman - I will immediately publish it for
> all the word to see.

Doug's Rebuttal: Somehow I doubt it, but we shall see. Everyone that
is using fake names and their handles will surface anyway in
Discovery, along with the connections in respect to how certain people
obtained copies of my private information, including my and my wife's
medical records. (Don't forget to try and hide those emails Mr.
Brooks). I look forward to discovery, and when you reply *everything*
will be then out in the open and revealed, especially all those real
names behind all those fake email names.

I for one look forward to your reply to Google.

Doug Grant (Tm)
>
> Nigel Brooks

[Mac]

On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 19:29:09 -0800, "DGVREIMAN" <dgvr...@comcast.net>
wrote:

>Doug's Rebuttal: The letter from my law firm (which you claimed did

>not exist) to the US Attorney, is attached to the complaint to Google
>and Lycos as an exhibit. No doubt you will read it. Are you
>claiming that you never received any of my private medical information
>or posted any which you received from one of your "associates?"
>Please stop lying Brooks.

*********************************
So what don't you send Nigel or post to the NewsGroup the alleged
complaint to GOOGLE and LYCOS ???

You claim that the letter to the U.S. Attorney from your alleged law
firm was also sent to those companies.
Why don't you simply mail a copy of it to Nigel or, better yet, post
it?
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.......
-Mac, the Medic

[Dr. Vincent Quin, Ph.D.]

tankfixer wrote:

> In article <XNydnZjXRfLbtNPW...@supernews.com>,
> dr...@coldine.edu says...
>
>>tankfixer wrote:
>>
>>>In article <o9ydnWzZnIB_dtHW...@giganews.com>,
>>>dgvr...@comcast.net says...

>>>
>>>
>>>>"tankfixer" <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote in message

>>>>news:MPG.25a9b8c...@news.bytemine.net...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>In article <Hr6dnTx0Nd6LiN3W...@giganews.com>,
>>>>>dgvr...@comcast.net says...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>This major law firm has been representing me for
>>>>>>quite some time, and has already completed their extensive
>>>>>>investigation of the facts, and has further written an extensive
>>>>>>letter to the US Attorney.
>>>>>
>>>>>I'd be glad to contact them directly.
>>>>>Who are they ?
>>>>
>>>>Email me directly, verify your real name, and I will be glad to
>>>>provide you with their name and their letter to the US Attorney.
>>>
>>>
>>>I will not
>>
>>Coward.
>>
>>;-)
>
>
> we know you are.

Son, if I had an issue with Mr. Reiman I would have called him at
the phone number he posted.

You little cowards can't even do that (much less email him).

[tankfixer]

In article <SsedncqoLLZB5tPW...@supernews.com>,

Sure you would..
But then you are not terribly bright.
But then I had not seen Mr Reiman post his phone number, just a phony
email address that he thinks people will trust to be some attorney..

>
> You little cowards can't even do that (much less email him).
> ;-)

Actually I've extended an open invitation to readers of this group to
visit the facility I work at when they have the open house to meet and
have a cup of coffee..

A number of readers of this group have taken me up on the offer..
However a number, like yourself and Mr Reiman will not..
Could it be you are concerned about being caught on federal property ?

[Nigel Brooks]

"tankfixer" <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:MPG.25b82b2...@news.bytemine.net...

Our resident troll doesn't have the balls to meet anyone or even to use his
real name. He had an orchiectomy years ago

[Jack G.]

On Jan 13, 7:11 pm, tankfixer <paul.carr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In article <SsedncqoLLZB5tPWnZ2dnUVZ_t9i4...@supernews.com>,
> d...@coldine.edu says...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > tankfixer wrote:
>
> > > In article <XNydnZjXRfLbtNPWnZ2dnUVZ_sMAA...@supernews.com>,
> > > d...@coldine.edu says...
>
> > >>tankfixer wrote:
>
> > >>>In article <o9ydnWzZnIB_dtHWnZ2dnUVZ_i2dn...@giganews.com>,
> > >>>dgvrei...@comcast.net says...
>
> > >>>>"tankfixer" <paul.carr...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > >>>>news:MPG.25a9b8c...@news.bytemine.net...
>
> > >>>>>In article <Hr6dnTx0Nd6LiN3WnZ2dnUVZ_rmdn...@giganews.com>,
> > >>>>>dgvrei...@comcast.net says...

> Could it be you are concerned about being caught on federal property ?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

How about posting your invitation again with your building number.

Jack G.

[tankfixer]

In article <cef30b76-9c6f-44b4-910a-d5e8c07abf72
@m26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, jfgr...@live.com says...

I to when the museum has their reopening..

But if you wanted to stop by other times just tell the guard at the gate
my name and he can direct you to the right one..

[Mac]

On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:52:40 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

>
>"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message

>news:cdtkj5lb117gg4pld...@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:41:30 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
>> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>>US ATTORNEY CONTACTED BY LAWYERS
>>
>> ****************************
>> Kindly provide the very specific URL for your alleged source.
>> Would like to ascertain that such is actually from the GOOGLE LEGAL
>> TEAM and not yourself simply stating such.
>> -Mac, the Medic

==========================================

>Mr. McDonnell, you have repeated this request several times while
>ignoring the information below that allows you to obtain what you are
>requesting. Please learn to read.
>

>Mr. McDonnell, please see the instructions below in respect to how you

>may obtain the information you are requesting. You need to email me
>and verify your identity.
SNIP
================================
And, yet once again, the infamous Doug Grant lacks the ability to
follow through on his threats.
-Mac, the Medic

[Daryl Hunt]

Back in the bit bucket for you until this stupid BS ceases.