NIGEL BROOKS SERVED BY GOOGLE/LYCOS- REBUTTAL
DGVREIMAN
NIGEL BROOKS SERVED BY GOOGLE/LYCOS -REBUTTAL
For all those that are ethical, believe in the truth, and is NOT a
member of a hate/smear and con gang like the Nigel N. Brooks
hate/smear and con gang, I sincerely wish you and yours a very Merry
Christmas, and further, sincerely wish you and yours a long, healthy
and prosperous life.
However, for the hate and con gang members, who regularly operate in a
tyrannical, cowardly and in a mob hate manner to smear and defame
veterans, I hereby provide the following rebuttal to their recent
fraud, false accusations and general cons - which have now been
provided to several different legal venues:
Please understand I am forced to post my rebuttals to the
hate/smear/con gang that operates under the tutelage and direction of
Mr. Nigel N. Brooks. As long as Nigel Brooks and gang's et al
hate/con and smear web sites and groups operate (which are clearly
designed and updated regularly to smear me with fraud, forgeries,
false accusations and general obloquy) I will be forced to defend
myself with the truth - as this and my past rebuttals clearly and
irrefutably provide.
Nigel Brooks Served
By this time Mr. Nigel N. Brooks and some of his gang members have
been contacted by the legal departments from Google and Lycos asking
them for sworn certification in respect to their rampant and flagrant
copyright violations on their "Get Doug" web sites and Google groups
(Federal court has ruled that "Fair Use" does not apply if a pattern
of spite and defamation is connected to the copyright violations).
Ergo, Mr. Brooks already knows the name of my law firm, the law
enforcement people that are already involved, and he has by now read
my law firm's letter to the US Attorney, and to various Federal law
enforcement entities. I am waiting for Brooks and his gang members
sworn statement replies that must be sent back to the Google and Lycos
agents, and of course I invite the hate/smear gang members to make
and issue statements to my lawyer, the US Attorney, law enforcement,
Google and Lycos about this issue. In fact, I and others *cannot
wait* to see their statements under oath!
Also note that after completing an extensive and comprehensive
investigation of the facts, including reviewing hundreds of posts from
the said hate gang, and my rebuttals, my lawyers have written to the
US Attorney and provided her with their conclusions and
recommendations, along with hundreds of exhibits supporting said
conclusions. Moreover, my law firm has further contacted several
Federal Investigators over some of the issues mentioned herein, and I
have, based upon advice of my counsel, personally contacted the FBI
in Portland, Or, and in Vancouver, Wa. I have been advised by the
FBI to file an official complaint with the FBI, and file a complaint
with the Oregon Police. I have also filed a complaint with the Clark
County Sheriff's office, and I am preparing other complaints for other
states based upon the conclusions of my law firm and their letter to
the US Attorney.
I have (with legal assistance) also rewritten my John Doe lawsuit and
it is ready to go as soon as Nigel N. Brooks (and/or some of his key
gang members) respond under an oath to the official legal complaints
and to the official complaints filed with Google and Lycos.
It appears, one way or another, this issue is going to the courts.
(Probably several courts considering I have been advised to file
several complaints in several different states). (If Mr. Brooks
refuses to provide you with any of the information mentioned above,
then email me directly at legal...@comcast.net with your request,
and once your email and real name have been verified, then I will
provide all information mentioned above. Please understand that
anything you say in statements in regards to these issues can and
will be used against you in a court of law). Note further that you
will retain a copy of your email, so any whines and excuses from Nigel
Brooks or members of his smear gang to NOT ask me directly to reveal
the information I am offering herein are nothing more than a
desperate attempt to keep you in the dark about the truth of this
issue. Of course they do NOT WANT you to contact me and read my law
firm's letters, for doing so would provide evidence they are the liars
and frauds I know them to be.
If you believe my actions are Draconian, then I must ask what would
you do if someone lied and posted that you were a pedophile, dealt in
child porno, broke into your medical records and posted some of them
on USENET, used fraud and forged FBI reports to defame you, lied
profusely about your military service (such as claiming I was never in
combat) and posted thousands of lies stating that I claimed I received
a Purple Heart medal, which of course I never said? Not to mention
the filing of false criminal charges against you and experiencing the
direction, tutelage and incitement from Nigel N. Brooks to his
smear/hate and con gang members to continue with such fraud and abuse
of process with similar acts?
I suspect anyone that was subjected to such fraud and con man false
accusations for as long as I have would be forced to do the same as I
have, and will. And you can bet I have just started to defend myself.
(If Nigel Brooks or any of his gang members deny any of the statements
I have provided herein, then once again, please email me directly,
confirm your identity, and I will refer you to the letter from my law
firm to the US Attorney and to various Federal Investigators).
Smear Merchant Disclaimer
I have better things to do than rebut the fraud and false accusations
made by members of the Nigel Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
However, unlike the gang's other smear victims, I will defend myself
from the gang's obloquy and fraud in each case.
You would think these pathetic souls and cowards would find
something to do other than spread their fraud, hate and smears about
people they have targeted for their obloquy, but alas, it appears to
me their malicious bullying and perpetual hate and frauds have become
their "pathetic life."
I believe Nigel N. Brooks and some of his hate/smear/con gang members
are nothing more than pathetic cowards and hate mongers.
Nigel Brooks Hiding From Independent Legal Analysis
I have repeatedly offered Nigel N. Brooks and his hate/smear/con gang
members the opportunity to take their hate, false accusations and
fraud to (1) the American Association of Arbitrators, loser pays, and
if that independent legal entity frightened them I even offered them
the opportunity to (2) pick any University they choose (that has a
law school) and they can submit their rants and fraud to that
University, and I will provide my rebuttals, and if the University
says I am lying I pay for everything, but if the University says the
con men are lying, THEY pay for the independent analysis.
Once again the cowards that compose the Nigel N. Brooks hate/smear and
con gang pissed their panties and ran for cover in respect to my
offers of an independent legal analysis of their outrageous, unethical
and malicious false accusations.
I also offered Nigel N. Brooks an opportunity to even NAME a single
document he claims exists in those military records he received via
his FOIA request about me that proves ANY of Nigel Brooks or any of
his hate gang's smears or statements they have posted about me . . .
once again we see Nigel N. Brooks and his smear gang hide, cower, and
pee their panties over this simple means to prove to the readers the
volumes of cons and fraud Nigel Brooks and his smear gang have been
posting about me and others on this forum.
You must always remember that hate mongers and con men are true
cowards - and that is one reason why I have been forced to bring this
issue into a public legal arena.
Web Sites for Hate and Profit
Note that Nigel Brooks and some of his hate/smear/con gang members
maintain web sites and a Google Newsgroup designed specifically to
defame me with fraud, serial lying, outright con man fraud, and of
course libel, which forces me to rebut their fraud with these truthful
rebuttals. Also note that Nigel Brooks and/or members of his hate
gang make a profit and/or gain value from selling advertising on
those said hate and fraud sites.
Once again, I have offered Nigel Brooks dozens of times (and/or any
of his con/hate/smear gang members) the opportunity to take their
fraud and false accusations to the American Association of
Arbitrators, or to any legal department of any University they select,
and if either of those entities agrees with Nigel Brooks in respect to
his accusations about me, I will pay for their services. HOWEVER, if
those legal experts agree that my rebuttals are correct and accurate,
then Nigel Brooks and/or his smear/hate/con gang members pay for the
independent legal analysis.
Nigel Brooks and his gang members run, duck, hide, cower, piss their
panties, and snivel pathetic excuse after pathetic excuse to hide from
and refuse my hundreds of offers to take this issue to independent
legal experts . . . and the reason they hide from such independent
analysis is obvious to me - they know they are lying.
Disclaimer Continues
Please be advised further this article (the same as all of my past
articles and exchanges with posters) represents an editorial on
contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in this article
represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical fact, nor is
about, directed toward or against any particular person - other than
those specifically mentioned herein. This article is being posted for
entertainment purposes only. If any person finds this post personally
annoying, abusive, offensive, defaming or otherwise disturbing,
please notify me of your specific reasons for annoyance via email at
legal...@comcast.net.
If we find your detailed objections reasonable (considering the
"reasonable person" doctrine and case law) we will then remove this
post, or the offending passages contained therein, from the Google
archive, publicly apologize and retract.
My intent is to entertain, and to present articles to USENET readers
prior to publication to determine interest, and not to annoy, abuse,
humiliate, or in any way cause anyone emotional harm by posting on
USENET or elsewhere. Please also note that defending myself from
harassment and obloquy with rebuttal posts has been deemed a "lawful
and legitimate" publication by my legal counsel. If I am not attacked,
libeled, defamed or harassed, or my copyrighted articles not
interrupted nor infringed upon, I clearly do not have a reason to
respond with a rebuttal.
Please also note that I intend to notify any and all ISP's and web
hosts of any annoying or calumnious post, web site or other similar
entity about me after I give the offender an opportunity to retract,
apologize and remove said post from the Google archive.
SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER TWO: Considering the typical ridiculous,
absurd and obviously false claims about my military service that
originates from the crackpot smear and con gang that operates on
alt.war.Vietnam, I also hereby certify and attest this article is NOT
a secret coded message that only gang members can decode with their
secret Federal Agent/Sp4 draftee/former Junior Reserve Officer/ midget
decoder and mind reading rings.
This means the Brownie crackpots' inevitable accusations and howls
that this article is really me claiming in a special soothsaying code
(a code only crackpots et al smear gang can only read of course which
involves their typical claim the American Heritage Dictionary's
definition's of simple terms, such as "we" "estimated" "involved"
"retired from" and "not representing any biographical claim" are all
incorrect, and only their "special interpretations of the English
language can apply to all English terms I use, and of course the gang's
standard nonsensical mind reading and soothsaying claims that (1) I
was a CIA cross border assassin that sniper killed Ho Chi Minh,
HOORAH - (2) that I personally killed 1803 enemy soldiers in Vietnam
and then feasted on their bodies (burp) (3) that I was a secret member
of the Mi Lai massacre, (let God sort them out) that I hunted down and
murdered unarmed Priests (take that choir boy) (4) that I was trained
by the Martian Army on Mars, and I have green blood, and retractable
fangs (slurp), (5) that the movie "Rambo" was copied after my deeds in
Vietnam and I still live in caves in the northwest (6) and best of
all, I went to the Carlisle War College to study WWII tactics even
before I was born!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHHA.
Needless to say, the smear gang misrepresentations of my past posts
are of course, not true.
I have posted dozens of times on USENET that I will not post
autobiographical facts about my life on USENET in any detail. Only a
quip now and then. And, if anyone wants to know the true facts, or a
clarification of any quip, or more information and details about an
issue which are clearly missing in my quips they must first contact
me via email, identify themselves, and then I will determine if I want
to exchange such personal information with them.
Although the above is my standing offer, I should mention that NOT ONE
member of the gang has ever contacted me directly over any one of my
posts. It is clear the gang does not want to know about obvious
typos, errors, and occasional ambiguities, nor clarifications, nor
corrections, nor do they even want verification whether I was the
actual author of the post in question. (Note although the above
statement is as clear as it can be - some smear merchants have
deliberately *averted their eyes* from this key disclaimer paragraph
for years - and ridiculously attempted to claim did not include all
past, present and future posts in this disclaimer - which of course
clearly is a lie. But for their fraudulent benefit - I *again*
reiterate this disclaimer applies to all of my posts, exchanges and
USENET writings, past, present and future. I further reserve the
right to use any type of fiction, nonfiction, hyperbole,
autobiographical fiction, embellishments and quips in my writings as I
see fit, whenever I wish, and I will not be censored by smear/hate and
con gangs).
As experts on Investigations and the US Military have noted, the gang
leaders and their members clearly want to avoid the truth whenever it
contradicts their contrived and conspired defaming parsing and
fraudulent misrepresentations and distortions of what I have written
in the past, or contradicts their lies and fraud in respect to what is
and is not truly contained in my military records, and of course,
their fraudulent use of USENET posts they know others have written to
use to smear me, defame me, hold me up to public ridicule, stalk me,
and otherwise further their years' long demonizing and vilification
campaign they have been regularly waging against me.
In short, the gang does not want to know the truth, and they are
desperate to stop me from defending myself as they know my truthful
rebuttals, which they cannot defend as they know what I am posting is
true, reveal them for what they really are.
The gang's lies and fraud border on the pathological, and include the
gang' preposterous and goofy fraud that (7) a Purple Heart VA card is
the same as a Purple Heart Medal (I have posted on USENET dozens of
times I did not receive a Purple Heart Medal) (8) Nor that removing
hundreds of typos, errors, misstatements made by typists and I found
so far in about thirty-five THOUSAND extemporaneous posts under
accounts I used, and then replacing the errors with the true intended
context and meaning by the author is somehow "sinister" and the
original discarded post was the correct intended post and the
corrected version is false! (Giggle).
Such glaring preposterous crackpot et al smear and fraud gang claims
about me are, as usual, blatantly false and equally ridiculous. (Ask
the gang leaders for proof of their claims the next time they make
such ludicrous claims and watch them scurry for their rocks or produce
their own forgeries, or perhaps typos, errors and such that have long
been detected and discarded in my waste basket they have dug out of
that trash).
And regardless of forgeries and discarded posts found in my waste
basket that were thrown there because of an error or typist
misstatement by one of our typist's, I have posted about two dozen
times in the past that my time in South America was spent (other than
an assignment and short visit to Southern Command after I left
Vietnam) exclusively as a Civilian working for Montana Western Oil and
Gas or PCA, which evidence proving such was scanned and posted years
ago.
Also, in response to the smear gang's et al repeated and convenient
outright lie and fraud that I never said that others were using the
same accounts to post on USENET as I did until the smear gang leaders
started their fraud, con and smear campaign against me and thereby
forced me to post on this newsgroup to defend myself, please see the
following proof that of course the gang leaders et al have been caught
lying again:
http://tinyurl.com/6d4aay TYPISTS' GALORE POST proves there were about
71 previous posts prior to the gang's glaring lie that I never
mentioned others posting under the same accounts I used until after
the gang leaders started to use a few typos, errors and post fragments
written by many different people, years apart, never written on any
military forum, deceptively spliced together with forged words added
into or subtracted from the hodgepodge of different context post
fragments so as to fraudulently alter their meaning or context.
http://tinyurl.com/7kfaqz Experts on Smear Gangs reveal what the
Nigel Brooks con/hate and smear gang is all about.
http://tinyurl.com/bu3dwb Those that Label Others KOOKS suffer a
psychosis named EID say psychologists - and that so-called "Kook"
votes never occur outside of the smear gang.
http://tinyurl.com/5o59lr Nigel Brooks' lies about receiving medals
he never received, and lies about serving in war campaigns and in
reactionary forces long after he had already left active duty.
http://tinyurl.com/bxrf2b US Government Web Site and independent
Experts on the US Military confirm Nigel Brooks and many of his
smear/hate and con gang lied about my military service and my military
records. (This read is important as the gang is claiming that my
military records disproved or prove various things they have
fraudulently claimed about me. However, in truth we find those gang
accusations and claims to be nothing more than outright cons and
fraud. Brooks and Rau and other gang members have been lying about
the contents of my records for years. Above represents clear and
irrefutable proof of their fraud and false accusations.
http://tinyurl.com/ddogy4 Proof of just a few of Nigel Brooks
outright forgeries which he has used to fraudulently defame and smear
me - yes *forgeries* - fraud and deception from Nigel Brooks running
rampant.
Purple Heart Defamation from the gang revealed and rebutted.
Irrefutable proof the gang has been using outright fraud, defamation
and forgeries to smear and defame in respect to this issue.
http://tinyurl.com/pomzo7 05/21/09
YET ANOTHER Investigator confirms the smear/hate gang lied about
Purple Heart medal claims. Also, all those times I said I did not
have a PH Medal, which the gang has been maliciously hiding.
Http://tinyurl.com/q6pk56 The smear/hate gang's fraudulent
accusation "I said I was a Hero" proved the fraud and lie it is: In
fact - I said the *exact opposite* as these several past posts clearly
prove. Once again the gang has been exposed lying about something
they have been forging and lying about for years. Hate and smear
gangs always attempt to paint their smear victims in a false and
defaming light - this is clearly the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and con
gang's purpose and mantra.
Here Nigel Brooks admits that he is not claiming I claimed I had a
purple heart medal - which contradicts not only Nigel Brooks
subsequent false accusations numbering in the hundreds, but including
his gang's fraud on this issue, it also contradicts similar fraud and
false accusations numbering in the *thousands!*
I said as the following URL clearly proves:
1http://tinyurl.com/y3yvb9 In this post I make it clear that I
referenced a Purple Heart Card and not a Purple Heart Medal - and the
difference between the two.
Nigel Brooks said:
2http://tinyurl.com/y3yvb9
In the above URL, Mr. Brooks also provided the following very clear
statements about this issue:
"He's doing the same now - by trying to insert the word "medal" into
the argument. Well no-one is accusing him of claiming to have had a
"Purple Heart Medal" - but the record shows he has claimed to have had
a Purple Heart **(VA service connected ID card)** and that he
received it in a real war. " (Emphasis added).
Obviously, Nigel Brooks above agreed and confirmed that I never said I
had a purple heart medal. Strange Nigel and his gang would
conveniently "forget" Nigel's conclusion about this issue after I
started proving they had lied about this issue all along - as the
above posts clearly prove?
Gang Preposterously Claims "Fiction" is "Lying."
When Brooks read my "shoot around little girl" or "shoot little girl"
post (for about the tenth time and counting) he said the following:
http://tinyurl.com/q9r9to May 22, 2009
"I would hazard a guess that the story is complete bullshit and that
Reiman never shot a 4 or 5 year old Vietnamese girl, otherwise
such an admission made in a public forum is astounding.
>>>> Nigel Brooks "
Then *after* I responded to Brooks (see URL above) and told him that
of course it was pure fiction just like my disclaimer states hundreds
of times. Brooks then reversed himself and wrote:
" he was in fact claiming that whilst he was in Vietnam he was >
forced to shoot a 4 or 5 year old Vietnamese child, who he claims was
attempting to kill him or his compatriots with an explosive device
concealed in a package of cigarettes.
>
> Now that is the logical interpretation of his post. In that post he
> says
> nothing about it being a fictional account or a debating method. The
> post
> stands by itself."
Nigel Brooks"
Fiction and Sarcasm - Brooks and gang style.
I must conclude (based upon the above statements from Nigel Brooks
that all posts "stand by themselves") that Nigel Brooks is
proclaiming and confirming that all the times he claimed he was using
fiction or sarcasm in his posts he was lying because he did not
specifically state he was using fiction or sarcasm in such posts. If
*all* posts stand as written like Nigel Brooks claims, and can never
be explained nor the true intent and context provided by the author
when asked, then I must assume the same rules apply to all posts
published by Nigel Brooks and his gang.
See how completely idiotic Nigel Brooks claims about my posts really
are?
We all know, the WORLD knows, that when Fiction is used in any article
or prose it is NEVER identified as Fiction! Mark Twain even said
that Fiction has to be more believable than nonfiction or it loses its
effectiveness! According to the fantastic howls of Nigel Brooks,
each time an author uses Fiction or Sarcasm to embellish or add
interest to a story, he must immediately inform the reader in that
same article he is using Fiction or Sarcasm! This fantastic claim by
Nigel Brooks is about the most ridiculous, idiotic statement I have
ever heard in respect to an author's use of Fiction and Sarcasm, and
it directly contradicts ALL authors, prose instruction, and journalism
101 in every University in the World!
So once again we have another Nigel Brooks arrogant first, now he is
claiming he knows more about writing Fiction than Mark Twain and all
Universities in the world!
I cannot decide if Nigel Brooks is arrogantly stupid, or just
arrogant? Or perhaps both? I will leave that decision up to the
readers.
http://tinyurl.com/madq65 In this post I point out that I have told
Nigel Brooks and his hate/con smear gang members *more than a thousand
times* (evidenced by Google archives) that I *DO NOT* post
autobiographical statements of fact on USENET - and if someone wants
to know whether what I post is Fiction, Non-Fiction, or whatever, they
*must contact me* and ask for more details.
I also posted that I DO NOT post autobiographical statements of facts
about myself on USENET as far back as 2001, and repeated that general
disclaimer statement in early 2003. Nigel Brooks and his smear/hate
con gang did not start their smear campaign against me until 2005,
*and Nigel Brooks and his gang even referenced and mentioned the post
in 2003 when I said I do not post autobiographical facts about me on
USENET - so they *knew* all along they were lying about the context
and meaning of quips they removed from my posts.
When an Author tells you MORE THAN A THOUSAND TIMES he is NOT posting
exclusively nonfiction on USENET, you would think that statement by
the author would resonate into even the pea brains of con men, smear
merchants and hate group leaders. Which of course it did as they
acknowledged this statement (Tom Rau whined and confirmed he read my
disclaimer more than 270 times) - but this fact had to be hidden by
such people so they could further their obviously fraudulent smear and
con defamation campaigns.
SELF ADMITTED AND SELF ACCLAIMED "TROLLS" OPERATE NIGEL BROOKS SMEAR
GANG'S MOST UNETHICAL FRAUD, SERIAL LYING AND CON MAN FALSE
ACCUSATIONS!
Many of the most vociferous and deceptive Nigel Brooks' key smear
gang members self-describe themselves as "Trolls."
These self-acclaimed and self-described *Trolls* have posted
hundreds of defaming statements and libel about me under those very
revealing Troll self-descriptions. (See alt.war.vietnam troll
section - you will find ALL of the self-described Trolls are connected
to Nigel Brooks and his gang's defamation and smear campaigns).
As just one example, here is the latest FBI forgery direct from a
Nigel Brooks smear/hate gang member that self-describes himself as a
"Troll." Note the gang member is again fraudulently using the name
of the FBI to smear and defame - which as we all know is a criminal
act.
It is obvious these Nigel Brooks smear/hate gang members will resort
to and use criminal acts to further the gang's smear and vilification
campaigns:
"Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.alt.net
From: Troll #351 <Leon...@sistine.va>
Newsgroups:
alt.war.vietnam,alt.politics,alt.news-media,alt.military,alt.military.retired,alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: That Second FBI Phone Transcript betwixt Mr.Doug Grant-tm
and the FBI
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:55:46 -0700"
Considering the self-description of these gang members as "Trolls" and
their propensity to use criminal acts (using the name of the FBI for
nefarious purposes is a criminal act - Federal and Brooks knows it)
to defame Nigel Brook's targeted hate/smear victim, can anyone out
there actually believe anything Nigel Brooks or any of his gang
members say about anyone?
If you do then you are admitting that you are de facto stating that
you believe people that are *telling you up front they are liars and
con men!* BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Question:
If you actually believe someone that is telling you up front that he
is lying to you, what would best describe you: (1) a moron (2) a
drooling moron (3) a member of the Nigel Brooks smear and con gang -
or perhaps all three?
Lawyers Speak "again"
All should know and be hereby informed that hate messages of any kind,
serial lying, fraud, libel, (which of course includes intentional and
malicious defamation and libel by omitting key facts) and other
publications of any kind will be recorded and used against the
perpetrator in a legal action. This is especially true for those
owners and participants in smear/hate web sites and hate newsgroups
which are used to further and facilitate hate and smear campaigns
against individuals.
End Disclaimer - Rebuttal Begins below:
******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************
GOOGLE PROVES NIGEL BROOKS IS LYING
Issue Background:
In a desperate attempt to CHA due to his and his gang's outrageous
fraud they posted about me which my public military records proved
completely false and fraudulent, Nigel Brooks and some of his gang
members dug through my electronic waste basket and found a discarded
post they then resurrected on the Google Archives (one member of the
Nigel Brooks gang claims he is a "computer consultant" and apparently
wrote malicious searches to find anything he could to use to defame
and smear me, including rummaging through my electronic waste
basket!).
Although the post in question ( a reply to Chip dated Feb 2003) was
clearly NOT about Purple Heart medals (as the last sentence clearly
proves) after a SDS member associate gang member connected to the
Nigel Brooks gang member, the SteveL anonymous cyberstalker (who
denies he is Steve Leyland) tried to insinuate otherwise, yet was
*immediately* told his insinuation was a "complete distortion" of the
true context of the post, I decided to remove the post from the
Google archive to immediately remedy any question about the true
context of the post.
(Note that I had already posted several times that I DID NOT have a
purple heart medal - and further confirmed that fact several times
subsequently, but I still thought that removing the post would
immediately remedy any question from those that were never in the
military and therefore did not understand the last sentence of the
reply - which of course is the key to the intended context).
After Nigel Brooks launched his hate/smear and con smear campaign
against me in March 2005 (ongoing to this day with new fraud additions
to his web sites) Nigel Brooks and some of his hate/smear/con gang
members then resurrected this *long removed and long remedied* post
from my electronic waste basket, and then fraudulently claimed (1)
that Google had replaced it back on their archives due to its
contents, and also fraudulently claimed (2) I did not remove the post
until 2006.
The false 2006 removal fraudulent claim by Nigel Brooks and some of
his con group was directly connected to their additional outright
fraud and con that the post was about medals, and they were trying to
con and lie and sell their outright fraud and con that I removed the
post due to the Stolen Valor Act which of course was promulgated in
2006.
The hate mongers, crackpots and con men that compose the Nigel Brooks
hate/con/smear gang knew they could never convince rational readers
that I intended to say something if I had in fact removed it from the
Google archives. No one is stupid enough to believe that someone
intended to say or convey something if they removed it from the
archives for the purpose of disambiguation or correction! Even hate
mongers know no one rational is stupid enough to believe such tripe -
so they had to dream up some con as a reason for me to remove the
ost - which they howled and fraudulently claimed was due to the
Stolen Valor Act - which was not even thought of until long after I
had removed this post, as Google as confirmed.
Of course, as Google has confirmed, this post was *removed months
before the Stolen Valor Act was even proposed - not to mention
enacted!* Obviously, if I had intended to convey what the con men are
claiming *I would not have removed the post from the Google archives
in the first place!*
Yet Another Third Independent Party Proves Nigel Brooks is Lying
Nigel Brooks and some of his gang member's outright fraud and cons
have been exposed by an independent third party ONCE AGAIN! How many
times has Nigel Brooks been caught in mid con and fraud? We are
compiling a list of his cons and fraud for an imminent legal action,
and you will not believe the amount of times this con man has been
caught posting outright fraud. His fraud and outrageously deliberate
and malicious false accusations are amazing! I suspect, but cannot
prove, that perhaps Nigel N. Brooks is one of the most egregious
hate/smear and con gang leaders that uses the Internet to spread his
false accusations and fraud against those he has targeted for such
attacks.
Nigel N. Brooks maliciously "frames" much of what I have said in the
past in the most false and defaming context he can dream up - and that
fact has been noted by every legal mind I have asked to review his
wild and outrageous false accusations about me.
What a Tangled Web of Deceit the Hate Gang Members have Spun for
Themselves
Nigel Brooks and his con men had to claim I did not remove the Chip
reply post until 2006 to add credibility to their first con that the
post was about medals and not about its obvious true context, which
was VA issued purple heart ID cards, which were issued at the time of
the post. (Note the true context of this post was verified during a
conversation with Chip within about 90 days of the post that Nigel
Brooks and his hate/smear/con gang are trying to distort and con the
readers into fraudulently believing their con the post was about
medals).
Of course, Nigel Brooks and his hate/smear/con gang have been caught
lying and falsely accusing red handed on ALL issues about this long
removed post:
Although it is clear to all military experts and legal experts that I
have submitted all facts about this issue that the true intent and
context of the post were NOT about medals, the Nigel Brooks
smear/hate/and con gang, even after being told the correct context
several times, and even after having the non-medal context confirmed
by independent military experts with 30 years of military service,
has continued with their false and fraudulent accusations about this
issue on a regular basis, including on their hate for profit smear and
con gang web sites and gang operated forums -which also make money
from selling advertising based upon their outright fraud, false
accusations, libel, and various other forms of false light defamation
and outright cons and deceptions.
Apparently, based on the fraudulent and false content of the gang's
web sites, and the advertising that are being sold on those sites,
Nigel Brooks has discovered a new con game - "internet defamation and
fraud for profit."
Moreover, regardless of the dozens of times I posted *I DID NOT* have
a purple heart medal, and the dozens of times that Nigel Brooks, Tom
Rau and his gang acknowledged that fact, once the SteveL smear
merchant and anonymous cyberstalker (who denies his real name is Steve
Leyland) managed to dig the old discarded post out of my electronic
waste basket (Google did not replace it and they have confirmed that
fact in writing) the con men started to present this "long discarded,
corrected and remedied" post out of context while ignoring the dozens
of other posts, both prior and subsequent, that stated I did not have
nor was interested in any Purple Heart Medal, and further this gang
maliciously ignored I and the typist that wrote the post stated
succinctly dozens of times the post in question was about Purple
Heart VA ID Cards.
Con Men Deliberately and Maliciously Snooping in my Waste Basket to
Produce More Fraud and False Smears
The mere fact these hate/smear merchants dug around in my electronic
waste basket to try and find discarded and long corrected items they
could then fraudulently misrepresent to lie and con about me alone
should give the readers some insight as to the unethical and
fraudulent tactics the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and con gang use
against their targeted smear victims.
1. Google has replied to me as evidenced below that contrary to Nigel
Brooks fraudulent claims (see below); (1) Google DID NOT replace the
reply to Chip post in question, and Google's legal department has
further confirmed that it NEVER reads posts and decides which posts
should remain or be placed on their archives or not.
This statement by the Google legal department of course directly
contradicts what Nigel Brooks (and some of his gang members) have
repeatedly posted about this issue (see below for evidence of their
posts and what they said), and of course also proves irrefutably
that Nigel Brooks and some of his hate/smear/con gang members have
been conning and lying to the readers about this issue for years!
2. Google has also confirmed in writing the post in question (the
reply to Chip in Feb 2003) was NOT removed in 2006, and was in fact
removed several months before, (long before any Stolen Valor law was
even thought of) and was removed due to the reason I provided Google,
which was "the post context was about purple heart VA ID cards." The
date of removal of this post (certified in writing by Google) was
also LONG BEFORE Nigel Brooks or any of his gang members ever said a
word about it. Once again, Nigel Brooks and his hate gang have been
caught in a mid con.
3. Google's statement about the date of removal for this post proves
irrefutably that Nigel Brooks and some of his hate/con/smear gang
members fraudulently, maliciously and conspiratorially, worked
together to falsely accuse me of a crime, and to imply and
fraudulently misrepresent this entire issue for the malicious purpose
of false light and fraudulent criminal accusations - all designed to
cast me and my military service in a false and defaming light - for
the obvious purpose to harm my reputation and profession, and to harm
me emotionally.
4. So far, (and counting) Nigel Brooks and some of his hate/smear and
con gang members have perpetrated the following similar nefarious and
overt acts against me:
a. After posting hundreds of false light, fraudulent and defaming
posts about me on USENET, and after someone else outed this key gang
member's real name, and after he said he was "visiting Muslim Mosques
about me" this gang member crossed state lines and filed a completely
fraudulent, bogus false cyberstalking charge against me with my local
DA.
After the Clark County Sheriff's deputy investigated the bogus
charges, and my lawyer also investigated same, and after we reviewed
the false evidence this hate gang member planted with that said
department to facilitate his fraudulent charges, and after the Sheriff's
Deputy reported back to the DA, the DA completely threw out,
dismissed and refused to prosecute this gang member's obviously false
and malicious charges. It was and is apparent to me that this gang
member had previously conspired with several other Nigel Brooks hate
gang members to file bogus criminal charges against me because
several of them joined him when he boasted about filing his false
charges on USENET - for the obvious purpose of malicious harassment,
defamation, false light fraud, and to cause me emotional harm.
B. After the gang's fraudulent and false charges were thrown out by
the DA (after a thorough investigation by the Clark country Sheriff's
department), then after Mr. Nigel Brooks in his desperation to stop my
rebuttals to his cons and fraud about me, called for and directed his
hate gang to file fraudulent charges against me with the Veteran's
Administration, this same gang member then mysteriously "volunteered"
to work for the VA in the same VA office that maintained and
controlled my medical records.
What this Nigel Brooks key gang member did not know was because of a
previous complaint to the VA about Mr. Thomas Rau posting some of my
private medical information on USENET, a "trap" had been placed on my
records by a Federal Investigator hoping to catch the perpetrator that
had been accessing my private VA Medical Files.
After the Nigel Brooks hate gang member posted some of my private
medical information on USENET, and provided same to third parties,
which they then trafficked to various other third parties, and this
process was made known to me, I then contacted the VA and asked them
if the person I knew as this gang member had, WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION
accessed my private VA Medical files. I was informed by the Federal
VA Investigator (in writing - a copy furnished the US Attorney and is
available for review if you email me) that in fact this person had,
without authorization nor approval by the VA, accessed my VA medical
records NOT LESS THAN THREE TIMES!
After a thorough investigation by the Federal Investigator, the Nigel
Brooks hate gang member was fired from the Veterans Administration,
and I was informed (in writing) by the VA Headquarters that he will
not be allowed to work for, on in any way access any VA Medical files
ever again. (If you want to know the name of the gang member ask
Nigel Brooks or email me as his name is stated in my lawyer's letter
to the US Attorney).
I asked the VA investigator if this gang members' propensity to
steal, traffic in and sabotage medical records should be provided to
the entire medical community in this gang member's area, and the VA
investigator informed me that would be something I would need to do
through other legal channels -although he recommended I do take
further action if the gang member continued with this harassment and
invasions, which of course, he and other gang members have done.
When Mr. Nigel Brooks provides you with the information he should have
received from Google or Lycos by now, you also will review several
statements to law enforcement (which Nigel Brooks and gang claim were
never contacted) from my lawyers.
Moreover, I urge all that wish to do so to contact these officials and
be sure to "tell them your side of the story" as I cannot wait to see
what some of these gang members say to Federal Investigators
(considering it is a crime to lie to them). In fact I and my lawyers
cannot wait to read statements from this hate gang - and it is time to
bring such statements under oath.
Real Vets Beware of Hate/Smear/Con Gangs
I find it absolutely amazing that any real Veteran would ever be
associated with Nigel Brooks or any of his gang members if they
actually believe in our troops and wish to support them. No wonder
the key member of the Nigel Brooks gang that has attacked our troops
fighting in Iraq by calling them "murderers" - is NOT a Veteran, yet
sleazes into Veteran's groups for the obvious purpose to smear and
defame *real* veterans. It is clear to me this hate gang's hidden
objective is to defame and discredit real veterans with lies, false
accusations and general fraud. (One gang member even recently
defamed the entire US Marine Corps, and he also said all NCO's were
"incompetent and ineffective" or words to that effect - not to mention
denied any POW's were ever held back by the Vietnamese, and further
claimed all that suffered from Agent Orange diabetes were "obese
slugs." Obviously, the true agenda of this hate gang is to attack
Veterans.
This post is a rebuttal to the Gang's recent (November 2009) USENET
fraud about this issue, both stated and implied:
http://tinyurl.com/cyj896 The Purple Heart Rebuttal post that
irrefutably proves Nigel Brooks and his gang have been lying about
this issue for years.
When I revealed that a Nigel Brooks gang member had dug the old
discarded post out of my waste basket and was using a known discarded
post as a means to con the readers and defame me, Brooks had to find a
con and fraud to counter the image of him and his con men digging
around in waste baskets for known discarded errors as a means to
maliciously and fraudulently defame and smear me. Soooooo - what did
con man Nigel Brooks do? He conned and lied about the source of this
discarded post of course.
Nigel Brooks posted that GOOGLE *decided* to replace my discarded post
back on its archives after it read the post and wanted to preserve it
for historical purposes - among other outright cons, frauds and false
statements about Google's involvement in the Nigel Brooks con game and
smear fraud tactics. (See below for evidence of Nigel N. Brooks
fraudulent statements in this regard).
So I wrote Google, and told them what Nigel Brooks had said, provided
Google with the evidence below in respect to what Nigel Brooks said
about Google's participation. Google has finally replied in part, and
here is what Google said about Nigel Brooks statements:
----- Original Message -----
From: <he...@google.com>
To: <dgvr...@comcast.net>
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: [#542092740] Your mailed complaint
> Hi Doug,
>
> Firstly, in regards to your requests based on defamation, please
> note that while we're sympathetic to your request... Google is a
> provider of information, not a mediator. We make no claims about
> the content of the many posts in our archive. We suggest addressing
> your concern directly to the author of the post in question.
>
> We are not equipped to assess the truth or falsity of statements
> posted to our site by third parties.
>If you choose to pursue legal action against this
>author, we are prepared to abide by any orders involving the
postings in
>question.
>
> In regards to your claims of copyright infringement, we ask that you
> visit the following page for instructions on how to file an
> appropriate
> DMCA complaint for Groups:
> http://www.google.com/groups_dmca.html
>
> If you have questions in obtaining such information, please feel
> free to contact legal-...@google.com.
>
>
> Regards,
> The Google Team
>
>
Note that I have contacted the Google legal department since several
times. They have recently verified that the post in question (the
Chip reply Feb 2003) was removed by me months before the year 2006.
(I have Google's written certification of removal). I am still
waiting for their reply to me once Nigel N. Brooks provides them with
his sworn certifications. Which of course will produce immediate
further legal action.
Copyright Violations
Note that I have already filed a complaint with the Google and Lycos
copyright agent in respect to the Google and Lycos Serb Bog group's
flagrant copyright violations. They will then notify Nigel Brooks
(should have done so by now) and ask him to certify under oath that he
is not violating my copyrights. If he completes such certifications,
then according to my lawyers he will be sued within two weeks of the
date we received such sworn certification. Or, if Brooks claims he is
violating my copyrights but has a right to do so under any provision
of the Copyright Act (such as "fair use"), my lawyers have found
several case law rulings from Federal Judges that state "fair use"
does not apply if the copyright violation is being used for spite,
harassment or defamation. (Not to mention to profit from shared
advertising fees) which is clearly the case in respect to the posting
history of Nigel Brooks and some of his gang members in my respect.
So if Brooks responds, he and others that have violated my copyrights
will be sued within two weeks from the date we receive such
certifications.
Further, note my copyrights are *registered copyrights!* What that
means is that I do not need to prove any damages for copyright
violations to obtain a monetary judgement against the infringers. For
*registered copyrights* damages are presumed and statutory, need not
be proved, and are awarded by the Judge along with restraining orders.
So at least I know I will receive my legal fees back when the suit is
filed. (I expect Brooks and his gang to actually lie under oath, and
then of course other complaints will be then filed when they do).
Also note that when Google provides Nigel Brooks with my copyright
complaint and asks Brooks for his certification, (which should have
already occurred or will occur soon) he will also be provided a copy
of my lawyer's letter to the US Attorney General, and to other law
enforcement and to other Federal Investigators.
I hereby urge Brooks and his gang to be sure and contact those law
enforcement officials and repeat what they have been posting on
USENET - replete with their out of context fraud and false
accusations. Then at least the investigators will be sure to have
both sides of the issue - and then we can move to determine who is
lying to Federal Investigators and who is not.
I know my lawyers and I have complied volumes of evidence in this
regard, and I for one cannot wait to see what the gang says under
oath.
Like I said, I have been forced by the Nigel Brooks hate and smear
gang to move my defense to Nigel Brooks and his hate/smear and con
gang smear campaign to a new and higher legal level. Again, I cannot
wait to read what the gang says under oath! Sometimes the cover-up
(especially when you are dealing with a conspiracy) becomes more
important than the initial overt act.
Also please note that I have been forced and taunted by the Nigel
Brooks smear and con gang to take legal action against them before
they will stop their fraud, false accusations, serial lying, cons,
harassment, and general obloquy. I tried every way possible to avoid
legal action, but it became clear that Brooks and his fraud and hate
gang were not going to give me any other choice.
Here is what Brooks was caught lying about in respect to Google:
EXHIBIT "H" - A sampling of how the Nigel Brooks smear/hate and con
gang is claiming Google is supporting their malicious smears, fraud,
libel, defamation and unlawful harassment:
1. Nigel Brooks using Google to defame and claiming Google is working
with Nigel Brooks smear and defamation gang to smear and defame
Douglas Reiman, a.k.a. Doug Grant (Tm)
http://tinyurl.com/llqt7n Nigel Brooks defames dgvr...@comcast.net
due to Google's defamation that his profile has been removed due to a
violation of terms of service.
http://tinyurl.com/o7txcw March 23, 2009 another hate post from Nigel
Brooks claiming Google is working with him to defame me:
"On or about March 23, 2009, those wonderful folks at the Google
Archive (the
very same ones who reinstated Doug Reimans posts) made a very wise
decision.
The banned a poster from their archives effective on that date.
1. What this means is that if you use googlegroups as your usenet
newsreader -
you'll never be bothered by this insufferable fool again (unless of
course he morphs into another account - which can be easily remedied).
Nigel Brooks"
Doug Says: Note above that Google denies reinstating any posts, and
stated clearly:
"Google is a provider of information, not a mediator. We
> make no claims about the content of the many posts in our archive.
> We
> suggest addressing your concern directly to the author of the post
> in
> question.
>
> We are not equipped to assess the truth or falsity of statements
> posted to our site by third parties.
>If you choose to pursue legal action against this
>author, we are prepared to abide by any orders involving the
postings in
>question."
> Regards,
> The Google Team"
>
Note that Nigel Brooks' false statement above that " Google (the very
same ones who reinstated Doug Reimans posts)" has been exposed by the
Google legal team as yet another outright con and false defamation
about me posted by Nigel N. Brooks.
2. My statement about the cyberstalker web names google site:
http://tinyurl.com/nnq64d
Jan 8, 2009.
"Meanwhile, the above Google group is open for people that wish to
join it and post rebuttals or whatever. I should also mention that
everything posted on the above web site has also been posted on
USENET - so that Google group is just another forum of many that
carries the same information. The only reason that site exists is
because one of the gang members has boasted about being a "computer
consultant" and he has also boasted about removing my posts from
several USENET forums. This same gang member also boasted about
forcing my erred and discarded posts to reappear for the purpose of
cyberstalking with the use of fraud and forgeries he is fraudulently
attributing to me which he dug out of Google's wastebasket. (Or that a
Google employee provided).
Doug Grant (Tm)"
3. The above Google archived post was repeated dozens of times by
this Nigel Brooks hate/smear gang member that goes by the anonymous
name of "stev...@ntlworld.com His pattern and repeated defamation
and fraud about me on USENET and into the Google archives represents
an obvious malicious intent to harass me, and to cause me emotional
and professional harm, which is an alleged violation of a criminal
law in the State of Washington. (Unlawful Harassment). This key
Nigel Brooks hate gang member has also violated my copyrights on
several occasions. (See Title 17 for the descriptions of both civil
and criminal copyright violations). The gang members have no reason
whatsoever to repeatedly post and publish such fraud, defamation and
hate other than a clear and obvious malicious intent.
4. May 3, 2009, Yet another post by the Stev...@ntlworld.com (Who
denies he is really Steve Leyland) that clearly states and proves the
erred posts' Google has certified to me in writing were removed from
my account and from the Google archives have been reinstated by
Google on its archives, and are being used as malicious libel,
defamation and as a means to unlawfully harass me.
(At last count there were more than 41 of such posts above posted by
the Nigel Brooks smear and hate gang all designed to use Google to
unlawfully harass me, and malicious defame and smear me, and to paint
me and my life in a defaming false light.
Note above that Google has denied the SteveL (who denies being Steve
Leyland) and Nigel Brooks outright cons and fraud about Google being
involved in reading my posts and deciding to reinstate them on the
Google archive. Nothing could be further from the truth, as the
Google legal team has clearly stated.
5. Nigel Brooks wrote the following, which claims that Google reads
my posts and GOOGLE decided to replace my long removed posts on the
Google archive "for the sake of the historical record." Mr. Brooks is
clearly, unmistakably and fraudulently claiming that Google is
working with him to smear, defame and unlawfully harass me.
Mr. Brooks also is lying when he said that Google "advised me in no
uncertain terms that they will not remove Mr. Brooks current site
(clearly dedicated to unlawful harassment, hate, smears, fraud, false
accusations and general obloquy) without a court order." I received
no such notice, nor any other notice in response to my numerous
complaints about the serberianbog Google site.
http://tinyurl.com/5uaukl June 10, 2008 Nigel Brooks wrote:
"Instead, I opted to transfer the site to one hosted by the good
people at Google (those same good folks who apparently revisited your
past efforts to removed the embarrassing posts - and decided for the
sake of the historical record, they should be reinstated). I note that
you have attempted to bully the Google folks to remove the site, using
the same tactics you used on the free webhosts. I have also noted that
Google has advised you in no uncertain terms that they will not remove
my current site without a court order.
Doug's Rebuttal: Nigel Brooks outrageous con and fraud stating above
as "Google (those same good folks who apparently revisited your past
efforts to removed the embarrassing posts - and decided for the sake
of the historical record, they should be reinstated)." HAS BEEN
COMPLETELY REFUTED AND PROVED A COMPLETE CON AND FRAUD BY THE GOOGLE
LEGAL TEAM! (See above).
http://tinyurl.com/mv6asu March 13, 2009:
6. The gang member that broke into my medical records is using and
referencing Google.
The following Nigel Brooks hate/smear gang member was the gang member
that was caught by federal investigators from the Veterans
Administration breaking into my private US Veterans Administration
records, sabotaging them by removing key documents and fraudulently
indicating on them that I had Cancer, and then trafficking and
publishing some of my and my wife's private information on USENET and
on the Google theserbonianbog web site owned and operated by Mr. Nigel
Brooks.
This issue applies to the Google group known as
http://groups.google.com/group/theserbonianbog
It is clear the Google newsgroup " theserbonianbog" was involved in
not only receiving but also housing and trafficking in stolen
information removed illegally from my Government medical files.
Also note this same hate gang member is claiming below that Google
reinstated my erred posts on the Google archive that Google had
previously certified to me in writing were permanently remove from the
Google archive for reasons attributed to Google management.
"AND, REGARDING YOUR CLAIM that SteveL, or Nigel, or myself hacked
into GOOGLE to retrieve the above from your "wastebasket", as you
show time and time again, you are fantastic on your accusations but
consistently lack any proof.... go ahead and complain to GOOGLE that
they were hacked.
Frankly, it is my opinion that GOOGLE reinstated your codswallop upon
learning of your propensity for threatening and harassing those who
challenged you, and especially your ongoing threats of lawsuit after
lawsuit.
--Mac, the Medic " (A.k.a. Dennis M. McDonnell).
Doug's Rebuttal: Dennis M. McDonnell's outrageous con and fraud
stating above as:
"Frankly, it is my opinion that GOOGLE reinstated your codswallop upon
learning of your propensity for threatening and harassing those who
challenged you, and especially your ongoing threats of lawsuit after
lawsuit." HAS BEEN COMPLETELY REFUTED AND PROVED A COMPLETE CON AND
FRAUD BY THE GOOGLE LEGAL TEAM! (See above).
7. Here is a post from Nigel Brooks fraudulently claiming that I
received a less than Honorable discharge from the US Army which was
posted via Google.
Message from discussion 1. Doug Grant receives less than honorable
discharge from military for sexual deviance charges...VIDEO PROOF
View parsed - Show only message text
Path:
g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!o41g2000yqb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Nigel Brooks <bettymar...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics
Subject: Doug Grant receives less than honorable discharge from
military for
sexual deviance charges...VIDEO PROOF
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 18:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 1
Message-ID:
<a8460f7d-8979-4895...@o41g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 98.77.154.240
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1252372871 7049 127.0.0.1 (8 Sep 2009
01:21:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 01:21:11 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
Injection-Info: o41g2000yqb.googlegroups.com;
posting-host=98.77.154.240;
posting-account=v3lC7QkAAABObSV_VspxF18_P_pGjZfY
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0;
Comcast
Install 1.0; GTB6; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0;
.NET CLR
3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30618),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
The above defamation is an absolute fraud and is typical of the fraud
that Nigel Brooks and his gang members post and have posted about me.
End sampling of the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and con gang using Google
and referencing Google's participation with the gang to smear, defame
and use unlawful harassment against the gang's targeted victims.
There are virtually *hundreds* of similar posts I could provide when I
am required to do so that involve and connect Google with this Nigel
Brooks smear gang.
Further, please again review my law firm's extensive letter with
hundreds of exhibits they have provided the US Attorney and other
Federal Investigators in respect to the actions of the Nigel Brooks
hate/smear and con gang - especially the acts of breaking into and
trafficking in my Veterans Administration records and then posting
some of those extremely private records on the Internet.
If you are involved in trafficking in my personal information I
suspect some will believe they can hide such events by removing
emails - boy are they in for a surprise!
Douglas Reiman
P.S. Note that clear morning report evidence of my admission to a
Hospital in Vietnam after a medevac from Can Tho, and my related stay
in that Hospital for several weeks, has been found and verified due
to the outstanding diligence of a clerk at the US National Personnel
Center at St. Louis. These records have been lost for more than forty
years - and we now know why they were lost. Up to now I never cared
one way or another to verify this event - but now I am prepared to
prove it in a court of law or to any investigator.
Now is the time for Nigel N. Brooks and his gang member to state their
accusations and defamation in writing - under oath. I strongly urge
them to do so. Then we can proceed accordingly. I am waiting for
their reply.
Douglas Reiman, a *real* Vietnam Veteran. (Formally a SFC E-7 in the
US Army).
Mac
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>I believe Nigel N. Brooks and some of his hate/smear/con gang members
>are nothing more than pathetic cowards and hate mongers.
***************************************
Well, I happen to believe that you are bombastic, obese, supercilious.
I also believe that you have, for whatever pitiful reasons, decided
to puff up your military resume with tales, with claiming deeds that
you did not perform and actions in which you did not engage.
I believe that you are so pitiful that, when challenged, you have
indulged in years of blather to maintain your stories, even when the
descrepancy between your military records and your stories were
pointed out.
I believe that you have deliberately chosen to engage in STOLEN VALOR.
I also believe that, rather that simply answer a specific request for
a specific URL you will indulge in your hundreds of lines of response
that do NOT answer the question directly ---- much as your years of
antics and abuse have already done.
-Mac, the Medic
DGVREIMAN
"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
news:66ukj5dp98175dtdl...@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:22:28 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>I believe Nigel N. Brooks and some of his hate/smear/con gang
>>members
>>are nothing more than pathetic cowards and hate mongers.
>
> ***************************************
> Well, I happen to believe that you are bombastic, obese,
> supercilious.
>
> I also believe that you have, for whatever pitiful reasons, decided
> to puff up your military resume with tales, with claiming deeds that
> you did not perform and actions in which you did not engage.
Rebuttal: A lie typical of Dennis M. McDonnel. Proof.
>
> I believe that you are so pitiful that, when challenged, you have
> indulged in years of blather to maintain your stories, even when the
> descrepancy between your military records and your stories were
> pointed out.
Mr. McDonnell, please name a single document in my military records
that disproves any statement of fact I have made about my military
service. Your claim that "descrepancies" exist is nothing more than
false accusations, fraud and defamation. Retract and apologize or
face additional legal action.
>
> I believe that you have deliberately chosen to engage in STOLEN
> VALOR.
Mr. McDonnell, your accusation above is nothing more than outright
fraud. You know it and I know it. Retract immediately or face
additional legal action for defamation and libel.
>
> I also believe that, rather that simply answer a specific request
> for
> a specific URL you will indulge in your hundreds of lines of
> response
> that do NOT answer the question directly ---- much as your years
> of
> antics and abuse have already done.
> -Mac, the Medic
Mr. McDonnell, you need to back up your statements with your real
name, email me, and you can obtain everything you wish. Or, you could
simply ask Mr. Brooks to provide it to you as he is in possession of
all you have requested.
I am also waiting for your answer if you refused to call back a
Federal Investigator that attempted to contact you several times?
Is that true?
SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER - 2010
Nigel Brooks Served
Smear Merchant Disclaimer
I believe Nigel N. Brooks and some of his hate/smear/con gang members
are nothing more than pathetic cowards and hate mongers.
Nigel Brooks Hiding From Independent Legal Analysis
Note that Nigel Brooks and some of his hate/smear/con gang members
Disclaimer Continues
>>>> Nigel Brooks "
Nigel Brooks"
Question:
Lawyers Speak "again"
******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net>
Newsgroups:
alt.war.vietnam,alt.military,alt.military.retired,alt.politics,alt.news-media
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 1:34 PM
Subject: Re: SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER - 2010
> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 16:12:45 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER - 2010
>
> ****************************
> Kindly provide the very specific URL for your alleged source.
> Would like to ascertain that such is actually from the GOOGLE LEGAL
> TEAM and not yourself simply stating such.
> -Mac, the Medic
Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell:
Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
news:ugfbj5t10bnl8fs55...@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:19:21 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>US ATTORNEY CONTACTED BY LAWYERS
> snip over 1,250 lines of codswallop
>
> ********************************
> In the screed with which you polluted several newsgroups, did
> you name the specific us attorney ??
>
> Path:
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-01.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mac <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net>
Newsgroups:
alt.war.vietnam,alt.military,alt.military.retired,alt.politics,alt.news-media
Subject: Re: US ATTORNEY CONTACTED BY LAWYERS
Message-ID: <ugfbj5t10bnl8fs55...@4ax.com>
References: <nvydnTtryqN0da7W...@giganews.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.2/32.830
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 20
X-Complaints-To: ab...@easynews.com
Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy!
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 23:44:39 -0800
Bytes: 1759
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.news-media:290224
alt.politics:5246427 alt.military.retired:462395 alt.military:462303
alt.war.vietnam:765749
Mr. McDonnell, are you claiming my email post from Google is a
forgery? If you are, please provide your evidence indicating such,
and if you wish additional information you need to read (again) the
following information. Simply email me, prove your identity, and I
will gladly provide you with the information you request. Moreover,
you did not answer the question about returning calls to federal
investigators?
Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell, (if this post came from anyone other than
Mr. McDonnell please advise) of course I provided all you requested to
Nigel Brooks and others that might be or allegedly could be involved
in stealing my (and my wife's) private medical information and
operating the gang's hate web sites. I filed official complaints
with both Google and Lycos, and they both have copies of my lawyer's
letter to the US Attorney. Nigel Brooks will be required to reply to
those complaints under oath, and when he does he will be sued in
Federal court within two weeks of his reply. Meanwhile, I will
continue with the complaints I have been advised to file.
Mr. Brooks has a copy of my lawyer's letter to the US Attorney, and
to whom else it was addressed, along with hundreds of exhibits.
Obviously, Nigel Brooks has the documents I mentioned above. All you
need to do is contact Mr. Brooks in the typical fashion you normally
do on a regular basis. (Please do not try to hide the past emails -
it would be a terrible mistake on your part as you must know they
cannot be ever really hidden).
Moreover, if you wish to *directly* receive the information you
requested, as I stated above, all you need to do is email me and ask.
As long as we can verify who you are, I will gladly provide you with
the information you have requested.
Moreover, your lies and fraud about me are well known, and if you wish
to provide them to investigators then I and my lawyers urge you to do
so - but not anonymously as you often attempt to do.
It is time to back up your hundreds of posts about me Mr. McDonnell
with your real name, we have reviewed them all and have noted several
deceptions and false statements. PLEASE repeat them while using your
real name - I urge you to do so at your first opportunity. At that
point we can determine if you are lying, and of course your real name
will be associated with your statements. If you are not lying I
would think you would WANT to back up your statements about me. If
you believe you are telling the truth, now is the time to back up your
statements with your real name.
Moreover, your acknowledgement that I provided you and others with
repeated notice to cease and desist your harassment and attacks
against me for *years* is hereby noted. Of course I attempted to
avoid litigation in every way I could, but obviously the gang's
smears, hate, fraud , *invasions of privacy* - unauthorized access to
my and my Wife's medical records, the trafficking in my private
medical information, and the posting of some of the stolen information
on USENET, and general false accusations continued regardless of my
and my lawyer's repeated notices to cease and desist such attacks.
I sincerely urge you to "go on the record" with your statements above
with specificity to the authorities and my lawyers - so be sure to
email me with your request for the information you stated you wished
to receive above.
I also have been informed that a Federal Investigator attempted to
contact you several times, yet you refused to speak with him nor
return his telephone calls. Is that information true or not? If it
is true then why are you withholding information from this
investigator?
Meanwhile, once again, I urge you to immediately cease and desist
your harassment, taunting and defamation as you have posted above and
elsewhere on this forum.
Douglas Reiman a.k.a. Doug Grant (Tm)
spammer
boy.
DGVREIMAN
Rebuttal: Your statements above have been proved a lie by Google. I
have posted their email below. If you wish additional information you
need to email me directly and request it. I will gladly provide it
when you do. If you are afraid to back up your statements about me
with your real name that is understandable. Lying to investigators is
not a wise thing to do. Moreover, you have failed to answer the
question if you refused to call back or talk with a federal
investigator when he attempted to contact you several times? Why are
you hiding from that question?
See below:
NIGEL BROOKS REP CON - REBUTTAL
SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER - 2010
For all those that are ethical, believe in the truth, and is NOT a
Nigel Brooks Served
Smear Merchant Disclaimer
I believe Nigel N. Brooks and some of his hate/smear/con gang members
are nothing more than pathetic cowards and hate mongers.
Nigel Brooks Hiding From Independent Legal Analysis
Note that Nigel Brooks and some of his hate/smear/con gang members
Disclaimer Continues
>>>> Nigel Brooks "
Nigel Brooks"
Question:
Lawyers Speak "again"
******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************
NIGEL BROOKS REP CON - REBUTTAL
When Nigel Brooks wrote that some of my causes of action were false in
respect to my John Doe lawsuit that is still pending to be re-filed, I
asked him which specific causes of actions were the ones he claimed
were false?
Another poster then added the following:
"He's asking for a list of falsehoods in his lawsuit?"
Nigel Brooks then replied on October 14, 2009:
"Bloody hell - I don't have the time to detail each and every
falsehood and
mischaracterization - but here's just one of them.
a. At page 20 of the 64 page Complaint he claimed that:
"Until the publication and continuing re-publication of the obloquy
and
defamatory material by Defendants, Plaintiff enjoyed a good reputation
for
honesty, uprightness of character, competence and truthfulness"
Nigel Brooks"
Doug's Rebuttal:
Nigel Brooks has found the time to post or incite more than eight
thousand (8000) defaming, serial lying and false accusing posts on
USENET about me, contact or incite others to file false criminal
accusations against me, contact or incite others to file false light
defamation about me with various third parties, and to generally
operate, run, control and direct one of the most malicious, hateful,
egregious, unethical and fraudulent smear campaigns on the Internet -
yet now he claims he "does not have the time to provide any evidence
to back up his false claim that any of my causes of action!"
What preposterous bullshit from this serial liar and fraud merchant.
Fact1: Brooks knows that he cannot claim any of my causes of action in
my John Doe lawsuit are false because he knows I can and will prove
every one of them - and more have been added since.
Fact2: Nigel Brooks fraudulent statements about my reputation above
also warrants some very interesting background information:
I have seen several repeated quotations from Nigel Brooks involving a
person that once was associated with my schools. Brooks and his
gang members quotes him often to defame me - but here is what Brooks
and gang are hiding about the person they like to quote:
Normally you would need to wait for my book to learn the following -
but without the detail I can produce, here is a general outline of
the people Brooks has been quoting and has obviously consulted about
me:
Note that by written agreement my students and my team members agreed
to allow clandestine surveillance of their actions in a casino, and in
respect to my teams, also agreed to undertake polygraphs, searches,
and clandestine videos of their actions by our security teams.
The person Brooks and some of his gang members have quoted often about
me was removed from my Blackjack team due to stealing money from that
team. After he was removed he clandestinely contacted some of my
former students without my knowledge nor permission, (he had stolen
one of our student lists) and against my specific written directions
to not do so, and against his written agreement with my school not to
do so without my permission and involvement, he and his partner in
crime secretly formed his own team with my former student's money.
When this traitor's team's money started to disappear, one of my
former students called me and told me what was going on. It appears
that each time this person Brooks seems to like to quote and his chum
would play with their team money they would lose...yet the rest of the
team were of course winning.
(Note that during my entire career with poker and blackjack I *never*
*not once* ever fielded or constructed a playing team that lost
money - and I have hundreds of testimonials to prove that fact and
will produce them in discovery or in court). (Also note the recent
movie "21" about a team of Blackjack players is a "joke" compared to
the amounts my teams won and the sizes of some of my teams - but that
is another issue that soon will be brought to the fore).
Once I was notified by one of the rogue team members about a possible
theft of my former students money, I called our security (who operated
in secret and was not known by anyone associated with our team or
schools) and asked them to watch and secretly video this person and
his partner the next time they played with the rogue team's money.
The evidence we received from our security team proved irrefutably
this person and his partner were stealing money from their own team!
And if this was not enough, once I started talking to the other
members of the team this person had illegally constructed I also found
out that this person's partner had been selling *the same defective
illegal computer* to several members of the rogue team, all for about
$5000 each! He designed the illegal computer it so that it would
break down, and when it was returned to him for repair, he would
simply make a tiny adjustment, tell the person that returned it he was
"waiting for parts to repair it" and then sell the same defective
computer (designed to break down again) to yet another unsuspecting
sucker. At last count he sold the same defective computer to at least
twenty different suckers - ripped off a hundred thousand dollars and
then skipped the State - never to be heard from again.
Apparently the two of them were into all kinds of money making illegal
scams. When I confronted one of them with our evidence, he of course
denied everything but he and his partner immediately "left the state"
to parts unknown.
The next time I ever heard about either one of these crooks was when
one of them started posting on USENET, and of course this is the same
person that Nigel Brooks has been quoting to defame me! Amazing that
Brooks would quote such a person while hiding his past activities!
Birds of a feather I must assume.
Perhaps Nigel Brooks would like to clear this matter up before we get
to court?
Another person that Brooks seems to be associated with that has
contacted me from my past was involved with a group of people that
joined our team but were secretly working for the casinos. My spies
inside casino security tipped us off about these infiltrators, and we
set our secret security on them, and watched them play with team money
for about two weeks. The films produced by our security team (also
former cops) clearly showed two of the infiltrators passing team
money off to a confederate (at that time the confederate was not known
to us but he showed up later at our school after we had outed his
chums - I guess he thought we did not know about him).
We also called for a polygraph for one of these thieves, which was a
part of our team agreement, and when their chief thief and spy failed
the polygraph, and when they found out we had video from our security
showing them stealing money from the team, and even knew about their
secret deal with the casinos to sabotage our team, they too hurriedly
left the State of New Jersey.
Since Brooks started his smear and hate campaign against me, I have
received some very strange emails from someone directly associated
with this spy group - he was making some very strange and preposterous
claims about my service in Vietnam in respect to my rank. He is
clearly allied with Nigel Brooks - but again I seriously doubt if Mr.
Brooks knows all of the evidence I still have in respect to his
"confederates. I *know* the truth about these people, and I still
have those video's and the accounts of what transpired, and I can call
a dozen witnesses to confirm everything I have said. (Since they left
the state the statutes tolled - so I and dozens of other former team
members would just *love* to see these people in a court of law).
So when Brooks says something negative about my past reputation, note
the caliber and character of the person's he is quoting or relying on
to corroborate his false accusations. The *only* people Brooks can
find that will say anything bad about me in my past are the con men,
frauds, thieves and system hucksters I have exposed or caught.
I cannot wait for Brooks to parade this lot in front of a Judge, I
will have a field day exposing their past nefarious activities - not
to mention demonstrate an ulterior motive for their lies.
However, you can believe the chances of either one of these two people
Brooks has contacted about me showing up in a court of law and
confronting the evidence they know I have about them is about the
same as Nigel Brooks confessing on this forum that he has been lying
and conning the readers about me for years.
In fact, I know about 60 people that would *love* to see these people
in a court of law! They cannot wait to confront those that ripped
them off and then took off before they could be prosecuted - perhaps
Nigel Brooks will help bring these criminals to justice - who knows?
I know the statutes of limitations were tolled when they ran from the
state - perhaps we shall see some justice once and for all in respect
to this gaggle of thieves and embezzlers Brooks seems to have
associated himself with just to find a way to stop me from posting my
rebuttals to Brooks serial cons and fraud? But even then I guess
Nigel Brooks will also need to explain to the court why he has been
quoting outright thieves and con men to the degree he has? I
certainly would love to hear Nigel Brooks explanation why he hid their
past crimes when he tried to use them to defame and smear me.
Doug Grant (Tm)
"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
news:66ukj5dp98175dtdl...@4ax.com...
Mac
<markrealmil...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>It is not like any
>one here believes he made SGM or was awarded a silver star or purple
>heart. If he uses his real email address it might make his claim more
>credible, especially his continuous claim to have made SGM.
=========================
You still have NOT provided proof of your statement.
Repeatedly, you have been asked to provide the messages where you
claim I posted such balderdash, including the date, the subject, and,
especially, the full headers.
Weeks later you still have not done so.
Although you continue spewing your lie.
What a putz.
-Mac, the Medic
SteveL
<markrealmil...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>I agree with you Doug. I also notice this McDonnell character is
>responding to you and others with email that is not legally register
>in his name.
This is a newsgroup, not email. Email addresses in the headers are an
optional courtesy and whether they are accurate or not is irrrelevant.
In fact most AREN'T, and for good reason. The ubiquitous spammers out
there.
>I think he has a lot of explaining to do for engaging in
>this criminal behavior.
I wonder if legal beagle Doogie will agree with you that one is under
a legal obligation to legally register the email address one uses in a
newsgroup post.
>
>I also believe this character who is using other people's email
>address is the one claiming to have been a SGM in Nam when the FOIA
>records prove he was merely a little spec4. I don't why he doesn't use
>his own email when he makes such outrageous claims. It is not like any
>one here believes he made SGM or was awarded a silver star or purple
>heart. If he uses his real email address it might make his claim more
>credible, especially his continuous claim to have made SGM.
>
>If these things are true he should post them under his real email
>address instead of stealing email addresses from law abiding citizens
>in my opinion. Personally, I think he just posts on here to disrupt
>and harass those who made it above SPEC 4. What other reason would
>some, who claimed to be a SGM in service use other people emaila
>addresses instead of his own? That is what I would like to know. It is
>un American to steal email addressed and it is identity theft. I have
>never seen him post on topic discussion like the rest of us are known
>to do, other than a few copy and past copyrighted postings.
>
>Mark
You're as crazy as Doug.
Mac
That person has its own little agenda.
It is determined to spew forth its accusations and provide no proof.
You are trying to discuss REALITY with a critter indulging in FANTASY.
Considering its behavior, it will lack any comprehension about the
"eMail" being an optional courtesy.
Given that critter and the other, in such an instance, such a courtesy
needs to be optional...
-Mac, the Medic
****************************
tankfixer
markrealmil...@hotmail.com says...
> By using an email
> on that day, an email that is my legally registered property, is a
> criminal act which is being investigated at this time.
>
Was he served with a notice on or prior to that date to cease and
desist?
Or have you engaged in a very lame attempt at fraud ?
Mac
<markrealmil...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Was he served with a notice on or prior to that date to cease and
>>desist?
>>Or have you engaged in a very lame attempt at fraud ?
===========================
>No need. The law is clear, if you use someone else' email address you
>are a criminal and guilty. It is prima facie evidence. He knows it to
>that is why is so nervous. The good new is that my Attorney says I
>don't have to prove anything as it is a slam dunk case.
>Mark
===========================
Still waiting for your attorney.
Still waiting.
Still waiting.
-Mac, the Medic
tankfixer
markrealmil...@hotmail.com says...
>
> >Was he served with a notice on or prior to that date to cease and
> >desist?
> >Or have you engaged in a very lame attempt at fraud ?
>
> are a criminal and guilty. It is prima facie evidence. He knows it to
> that is why is so nervous. The good new is that my Attorney says I
> don't have to prove anything as it is a slam dunk case.
>
Since his use of the domain predates your purchase you have no case..
In fact a case could be made you are attempting to blackmale him.
tankfixer
NoSpa...@NoSpamzANYday.xyz says...
He probably thinks that his public defender will handle his civil
complaints..
Jack G.
> You just proved my case as he posted 21 message AFTER my legal
> purchase. He is in deep shit.
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> >Since his use of the domain predates your purchase you have no case..
>
> - Show quoted text -
Mark. All us real vets have been in deep shit many times and we still
are kicking.
When you file your charges in Federal Court you name and address
become public record.
Then the real fun will begin.
Jack G.
Mac
Waiting...
Waiting...
Waiting for your attorney.
Waiting for your attorney.
Waiting for your attorney.
-Mac, the Medic
********************
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:08:28 -0500, Mark
<markrealmil...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>You just proved my case as he posted 21 message AFTER my legal
>purchase. He is in deep shit.
>Mark
*****************
TankFixer:
Jones' ex sock puppet
<stev...@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote:
>You're as crazy as Doug.
Actually, I think that Doug really *is* a loon... this guy is just
annoying.
Jones
dino
>
>Numerous studies have concluded that those who steal other people's
>email addresses are the same ones who Steal Valor.
Break out the tea bags folks. This is the interlude between Otis Willie's
latest... Heh.
tankfixer
markrealmil...@hotmail.com says...
>
> You just proved my case as he posted 21 message AFTER my legal
> purchase. He is in deep shit.
Was he aware that you made said purchase ?
Did you provide him with adequate notice that the domain name belonged
to you ?
Or are you attempting an entrapment ?
>
> Mark
tankfixer
markrealmil...@hotmail.com says...
>
> I have no problems with that as the truth and admissible evidence is
> on my side. A Ward Attendant just can't go around using email
> addresses that do not belong to him as the evidence proves he did.
> Such conduct is criminal and will not be tolerated here or elsewhere.
> Numerous studies have concluded that those who steal other people's
> exception. Now sit down and behave yourself. If all you are going to
> do is troll and disrupt do it elsewhere, that type of behavior is not
> welcome on this group.
So why are you continuing to whine ?
Go do your civic duty and file your claim.
>
> Mark
tankfixer
markrealmil...@hotmail.com says...
>
> Legally none of that matters.
>
> All that has to be proved is that he used my email address while it
> was legally registered to me. However there is evidence that he was
> ordered to stop using an email that was not registered to him and he
> chose to continue to break the law instead.
>
> Yes, I have a legal certificate being sent to me with date/time stamp.
> The guilty party in question posted 21 harassing messages using my
> email address. If the entity that owned the email domain prior to my
> registration wishes to press charges for the illegal use of their
> email address prior to date of my registration that is their concern.
> They have been contacted about this matter.
>
> At no point did the guilty party ever have the email address
> registered in his name. He steals other people's email addresses to
> post hate and vile and lies about his service in Vietnam on these
> newsgroups. The good news is that because of this cause of action he
> will no longer be permitted to do so.
>
> The guilty party did knowing lie when using the email address of
> others by claiming he was a medic, a SGM, and that he earned various
> awards like the Silver Star and a Purple Heart. Note that these claims
> were made by him when he was illegally using other people's email
> address which put the legal owner of said address at risk of criminal
> prosecution under the Stolen Valor ACT.
>
> In others words the guilty party was willfully and with malice
> engaging in what is known as " Identity Theft". There is never a
> justifiable defense of using someone else's email to engage in the
> filthy and hateful behavior the guilty party is known to have engaged
> in. I always use my real email addresses and real name as do most
> other real honorable Veterans. It is a shame and Un American that we
> have people pretending to be veterans engaging in such unethical
> conduct at the expense of innocent victims.
>
> I will not tolerate it.
Then stop whining about it here and go to court...
The accused has the right to face his accuser...
Are you man enough ?
>
>
> Mark
Mac
<markrealmil...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>The guilty party did knowing lie when using the email address of
>others by claiming he was a medic, a SGM...
********************
Still waiting for you to provide proof of that accusation that I
posted a claim to be a SGM...
Nigel Brooks
"Mark" <markrealmil...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:q6kbq5pjt5md91is4...@4ax.com...
> None of that concerns me.
>
> The rule of law and admissible evidence is the ONLY thing that
> matters. That it will be a public record is a good thing as it will
> deter other criminals and thieves from stealing the identity of
> honorable war veterans such as myself.
>
> As for you being a " real" veteran I have yet to see any proof to
> substantiate that claim. If I go solely by your posting history and
> and trolling behavior I would opine you are not a veteran.
>
> It seems your only goal on our group here has been to disrupt. I have
> yet to see you post anything that could remotely be considered on
> topic here. As others have noted and mentioned here you clearly show a
> lack of knowledge in the very basic elements of military life which
> brings your claim to be a veteran in suspect.
>
> If I had to guess I would side with the majority here and say you not
> a veteran but in reality I don't give a rats ass one way or the other.
> My main concern is that you continue to disrupt a newsgroup many of us
> real veterans enjoy and that not acceptable. I challenge you to read
> our charter here and start following our rules. That is why we put
> them in place in the first place.
>
> Mark