Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Memorandum Decision and Order of Judge Patel

0 views
Skip to first unread message

krp

unread,
Oct 16, 2009, 6:59:45 AM10/16/09
to

"Andrew Usher" <k_over...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:5370dbbc-8ced-4eab...@11g2000yqp.googlegroups.com...

>> In Juvenile Court, Judges have VERY wide lattitude,
>> there are often NO TRANSCRIPTS which makes
>> appeals difficult, plus normal appeals are not allowed
>> and interlocutory appeals are VERY rarely granted.
>>
>> The pretense is that these proceedings are
>> secret to protect the privacy of the children.
>>
>> The truth is that they are secret to protect the racket.
>
> Yes, juvenile and family courts basically operate outside the law,
> giving judges tyrannical power (http://groups.google.com/group/soc.men/
> browse_thread/thread/66d58b21a871062d/76ab5d295d1a5999?
> lnk=gst&q=arbitrary+power#76ab5d295d1a5999). Hardly anyone knows what
> goes on there unless they've been there, and that's the way our media
> wants it to be - NO ONE could do an expose on this stuff.
>
>> The Public's view of Judges as EXPERTS
>> is a MYTH that serves to intimidate people
>> but it's basically a crock of excretory residue.
>
> It seems that the way judges are chosen in this country has not much
> to do with merit.


Andy - Judges are selected in a POLITICAL SYSTEM. Radical feminism has
seen to that as have other groups with an axe to grind on legal outcomes. If
a judge renders a decision that the lunatic fringe doesn't like (feminazis)
that judge is likely to be removed from office. It is not beyond radical
feminists to arrange to "set up" the judge. That might include a fake rape
charge, or just catching him cheating on his wife. It HAS included female
divorce litigants making known to the judge that sex is available and
getting video or photos to make sure the outcome for her is most favorable.
Judges banging the women in divorce cases is hardly rare. What is amusing is
that at one time the California Bar Association even said it was not
unethical for a judge or lawyer to sleep with a female litigant in a divorce
case. Did you ever wonder who so many men get screwed in California in
custody cases? The screwing you get is for the screwing the judge got. Do I
sound cynnical? I have been at this for 33 years and counting.


0 new messages