Re: Women as divorce freeloaders and David Moore's LOGIC
krp
"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
news:4ee49a7dee2e7192...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
>>> The really hilarious part is that he claims to be this hotshot legal
>>> consultant... and yet, he couldn't prevent his ex-wife from supposedly
>>> dragging the case out for years, running up fees, etc.
>>
>> Moore in your VAST VAST VAST legal experience how does any party lock
>>the courthouse door to the adverse party? How does one force the other
>>party's lawyer to meet deadlines that are in black letter law, if contempt
>>findings and fines don't do it? What does one do when the Judge is FIRED
>>on
>>the second day of trial?
> A real legal professional would know the answer to these questions. Times
> like these, I'll bet you regret that you purchased your education
> fraudulently?
Because YOU have them on your hatesite? Sure! If they are dumb as a
rock!!!
>>Maybe you missed the newspaper article on it. What
>>does one do when opposing counsel "accidentally" takes and loses evidence?
>>How does being a HOTSHOT deal with any of that, Moore, in your EXPERT
>>LEGAL
>>OPINION?
> So in other words, you couldn't manage a simple divorce case, no children
> involved, a shack in Palm Harbor and a few insignificant
> collections....yet
> you expect people to hire you to consult on cases which involve children,
> false accusations of sexual abuse, potential jail time, etc. etc. That,
> and the fact that you hold no degree, should be a red flag to anyone
> thinking of hiring you.
How do I "MANAGE" in yolur VAST LEGAL EXPERTISE, Moore a situation where
the Judge is FIRED in the second day of trial? How does a "HOTSHOT" haandle
that? HOW would the GREAT DAVID MOORE handle it? Just give us your learned
legal opinion MOORE? Maybe you can cite some case law on how YOU would
HANDLE it? As to my ex's lawyer, having fines imposed onHER, having her HELD
IN CONTEMPT, and the BAR reprimanding her, what do you suggest we could ahve
done when she didn't meet deadlines and fsailed to show at hearings???? How
wpould ATTORNEY DAVID MOORE have handled it?
>> My ex had the best of all worlds. I was paying off her car every
>>month as well as credit card bills, and she was shacking up with her
>>boyfriend. She had no need to live legitimately. She had TWO MEN
>>supporting
>>her (and she had her own career) as an executive of an insurance company.
>>WHY would SHE be in a hurry? She also knew I had moved on and wanted to
>>remarry. Which PISSED her off no end. The typical female.
> As you've admitted that you were cheating on her, why is this surprising?
Moore you remain and IDIOT. By the time our final hearing was held we
had been LEGALLY SEPARATED ( as one who THINKS of himself as a lawyer, you
should KNOW that a LEGAL SEPARATION removes the "cheating" issue. ) You DO
hold yourself out to be a LEGAL EXPERT to others. Now perhaps you can
EXPLAIN "Legal Separation pending divorce?" You DO know ALL the law in that
regard, right DAVEY? It is really amusing Davey I mean HILARIOUS that you
seem to ignore that by the time that hearing came up SHE was "shacking up"
with her then boyfriend and I just wanted to be married to somebody else in
another country I was NOT shacking up with. Your fukkekd up logic is AMAZING
Moore. It is the twisted logic of the psychopath. Actually I could no more
hold HER life against her than an IDIOT like you can hold mine against me.
freedom
>ATTORNEY AT LAW DAVID MOORE (Yeah! RIGHT!)
>"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
>news:4ee49a7dee2e7192...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
>
>>>> The really hilarious part is that he claims to be this hotshot legal
>>>> consultant... and yet, he couldn't prevent his ex-wife from supposedly
>>>> dragging the case out for years, running up fees, etc.
>>>
>>> Moore in your VAST VAST VAST legal experience how does any party lock
>>>the courthouse door to the adverse party? How does one force the other
>>>party's lawyer to meet deadlines that are in black letter law, if contempt
>>>findings and fines don't do it? What does one do when the Judge is FIRED
>>>on
>>>the second day of trial?
>
>> A real legal professional would know the answer to these questions. Times
>> like these, I'll bet you regret that you purchased your education
>> fraudulently?
>
> Because YOU have them on your hatesite? Sure! If they are dumb as a
>rock!!!
I don't have any such questions on http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com.
>
>>>Maybe you missed the newspaper article on it. What
>>>does one do when opposing counsel "accidentally" takes and loses evidence?
>>>How does being a HOTSHOT deal with any of that, Moore, in your EXPERT
>>>LEGAL
>>>OPINION?
>
>> So in other words, you couldn't manage a simple divorce case, no children
>> involved, a shack in Palm Harbor and a few insignificant
>> collections....yet
>> you expect people to hire you to consult on cases which involve children,
>> false accusations of sexual abuse, potential jail time, etc. etc. That,
>> and the fact that you hold no degree, should be a red flag to anyone
>> thinking of hiring you.
>
> How do I "MANAGE" in yolur VAST LEGAL EXPERTISE, Moore a situation where
>the Judge is FIRED in the second day of trial? How does a "HOTSHOT" haandle
>that?
You ought to know.
So, to recap: some attorney walked all over you, by missing a few
deadlines, in a simple divorce case which involved no children, no spousal
support, a rundown shack in Palm Harbor and a collection of faggoty dolls.
And yet, you expect people to hire you in cases involving child custody,
allegations of sexual abuse, psychological testing and criminal
accusations?
HOW would the GREAT DAVID MOORE handle it? Just give us your learned
>legal opinion MOORE? Maybe you can cite some case law on how YOU would
>HANDLE it? As to my ex's lawyer, having fines imposed onHER, having her HELD
>IN CONTEMPT, and the BAR reprimanding her, what do you suggest we could ahve
>done when she didn't meet deadlines and fsailed to show at hearings???? How
>wpould ATTORNEY DAVID MOORE have handled it?
I don't know how he would have handled it. I've never heard of an attorney
by that name.
>
>>> My ex had the best of all worlds. I was paying off her car every
>>>month as well as credit card bills, and she was shacking up with her
>>>boyfriend. She had no need to live legitimately. She had TWO MEN
>>>supporting
>>>her (and she had her own career) as an executive of an insurance company.
>>>WHY would SHE be in a hurry? She also knew I had moved on and wanted to
>>>remarry. Which PISSED her off no end. The typical female.
>
>> As you've admitted that you were cheating on her, why is this surprising?
>
> Moore you remain and IDIOT. By the time our final hearing was held we
>had been LEGALLY SEPARATED ( as one who THINKS of himself as a lawyer, you
>should KNOW that a LEGAL SEPARATION removes the "cheating" issue. ) You DO
>hold yourself out to be a LEGAL EXPERT to others.
No, I don't. Although I am closer to being an attorney than you are, I've
never claimed to be one.
> Now perhaps you can
>EXPLAIN "Legal Separation pending divorce?" You DO know ALL the law in that
>regard, right DAVEY?
The law has nothing to do with it. It's morally wrong to be with someone
else while you're still married. "Till death do us part" and all
that....but then, you never were one for keeping your word.
> It is really amusing Davey I mean HILARIOUS that you
>seem to ignore that by the time that hearing came up SHE was "shacking up"
>with her then boyfriend
I have no knowledge that she was doing so. Forgive me if I don't simply
take your word for it.
>and I just wanted to be married to somebody else in
>another country I was NOT shacking up with.
Right, because you needed someone docile whom you could control.
>Your fukkekd up logic is AMAZING
>Moore. It is the twisted logic of the psychopath. Actually I could no more
>hold HER life against her than an IDIOT like you can hold mine against me.
Odd that earlier today, Greg referred to you as a psychopath.
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
The truth about Kenneth Pangborn of KRP Consulting, 3648 Cockatoo Drive,
New Port Richey, Florida
"Carol Ann you don't KNOW shit! Youy are LYING! ...... Jesus Christ you are
one DESPICABLE CUNT!!!! ....Bitch you are GUTTER SLIME!"
--Kenneth Pangborn, from a usenet argument with a female debator,
highlighting his typical views on women
"Rumors about ken are true, he is a bad man. That is why both my mother and
I ran out of there as fast as we could back in the late summer of 2002. He
ruined my life and my moms life....His business is a scam, as he is in the
rest of his life. He enjoys child pornography and was investigated for that
as well....he'll call my mom 20 times a day until she answers...[Ken's
sister-in-law Rebecca Reilly] wouldnt come over to our house anymore
because of how he would talk to her and come on to her....and he had over
180 pictures of her on his computer"
--Ken Pangborn's daughter Megan
"Blood, breath or urine?"
--question to Ken Pangborn from a Florida police officer in November 2008,
during a traffic stop from which Pangborn was subsequently charged with
DUI**
"...beating [some kids] into a bloody pulp is the ONLY thing
that would get through to them."
--Ken Pangborn on child rearing
"If you call the police, I'll knock out all of your teeth, I'll cripple
you. I may go to prison for it, but when I get out, I'll be able to walk,
but you will still be a cripple."
--Pangborn puppet Greg Hanson of alt.support.child-protective-services **,
in a verbal threat to his girlfriend
** - this conclusion was reached via applying Ken and Greg's logic
Keywords: false allegations,sexual abuse,marital rape, date rape, sexual
harassment,child abuse,domestic violence,rape allegations,false allegations
of child abuse,false rape allegations,false abuse accusations,false
accusations,recovered memories,child sexual abuse,abuse child,sexual
assault,child molestation,reactive attachment disorder,penile
plethysmograph,polygraph,attorneys,divorce,visitation,pedophiles, thinking
about hiring ken pangborn,florida trial consulting,florida false
allegations,child abuse,brianna bragg
More-keywords: KRP CONSULTING. False allegations of child abuse, false
abuse accusations, false domestic violence allegations help, false rape
allegations, abuse child, sexual abuse, child sexual abuse, false
allegations, false accusations, recovered memories, sexual assault, child
molestation, child sexual abuse, reactive attachment disorder, penile
plethysmograph, polygraph, trial consulting, jury consulting, jury
selection, jury voire dire, wrongful allegations, false child sexual abuse
allegations. Wrongful child sexual abuse allegations. Domestic Violence.
Rape. Marital rape. Date Rape. Confidence Rape.
Yet-more-keywords: ken pangborn,kenneth pangborn,barbara pangborn,barbara
sanciprian,palm harbor,tampa,attorneys,florida lawyers,florida
attorneys,tampa lawyers,tampa attorneys,trial consultant,trial
consulting,dui,domestic violence,vawa,abuse,3648 cockatoo,new port
richey,ernesto sanciprian,ernesto miguel blanco sanciprian,blanco
sanciprian,bryce carter,holguin,julio aguilar,yudith bacallao,raimundo
cabrera,ana hernandez chi,lixandro cordero,leandis diaz,al faisbuker,wendy
gil,armando capo ramos,george riveron,reinaldo rodriguez,lexis ross,liana
yisell alvarez silveira,madelyn tamayo,manuel toledo,thais valdes
Extra-keywords: Julito Sainz,craig clawson,lia yisell
krp
"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
>>>>> The really hilarious part is that he claims to be this hotshot legal
>>>>> consultant... and yet, he couldn't prevent his ex-wife from supposedly
>>>>> dragging the case out for years, running up fees, etc.
>>>> Moore in your VAST VAST VAST legal experience how does any party
>>>> lock
>>>>the courthouse door to the adverse party? How does one force the other
>>>>party's lawyer to meet deadlines that are in black letter law, if
>>>>contempt
>>>>findings and fines don't do it? What does one do when the Judge is FIRED
>>>>on
>>>>the second day of trial?
>>> A real legal professional would know the answer to these questions.
>>> Times
>>> like these, I'll bet you regret that you purchased your education
>>> fraudulently?
>> Because YOU have them on your hatesite? Sure! If they are dumb as a
>>rock!!!
> I don't have any such questions on http://www.aboutken
You have CLAIMS on your hatesite Moore. But thanks for agreeing it IS a
hatesite.
Moore you are so FREE with your legal claims about my case. Tell me, IN
YOUR EXPERT LEGAL OPINION, what could *I* have done as whjat YOU CALL a
"hotshot legal consultant" have done about a judge being fired in the middle
of a trial? What would the GREAT David Moore have done? Do a little history
digging Davey, you're good at it. Judge Charles Cope was the subject of
several newpaper articles including several on him being removed during our
trial. So again, Moore what should I have DONE as a "HOTSHOT" as you say
about that?
>>>>Maybe you missed the newspaper article on it. What
>>>>does one do when opposing counsel "accidentally" takes and loses
>>>>evidence?
>>>>How does being a HOTSHOT deal with any of that, Moore, in your EXPERT
>>>>LEGAL
>>>>OPINION?
>>
>>> So in other words, you couldn't manage a simple divorce case, no
>>> children
>>> involved, a shack in Palm Harbor and a few insignificant
>>> collections....yet
>>> you expect people to hire you to consult on cases which involve
>>> children,
>>> false accusations of sexual abuse, potential jail time, etc. etc. That,
>>> and the fact that you hold no degree, should be a red flag to anyone
>>> thinking of hiring you.
>>
>> How do I "MANAGE" in your VAST LEGAL EXPERTISE, Moore a situation
>> where
>>the Judge is FIRED in the second day of trial? How does a "HOTSHOT"
>>haandle
>>that?
> You ought to know.
YOU are thr one playing LEGAL EXPERT here Moore. What should I have
done about a Judge who had gotten himself into his own legal problems? As a
"HOTSHOT" I mean? As a "HOTSHOT" what would YOU have done in your VAST LEGAL
EXPERTISE? Judges on cases here are assigned on rotation. You don't get to
pick your own judge. So, Davey, what do you claim I should have done about
it?
> So, to recap: some attorney walked all over you, by missing a few
> deadlines, in a simple divorce case which involved no children, no spousal
> support, a rundown shack in Palm Harbor and a collection of faggoty dolls.
> And yet, you expect people to hire you in cases involving child custody,
> allegations of sexual abuse, psychological testing and criminal
> accusations?
Moore your recitation of facts reflects your deeply seated mental
illness. The lawyer didn't miss "a few" deadlines, she didn't meet ANY
deadlines. She was held in contempt repeatedly and fined for her contempt.
After the case her unprofessional behavior resulted in a rebuke by the Bar,
making her take remedial courses on professional conduct, and being told she
was not welcome to practice law in that county again. The home was not a
"rundown shack" Moore. Your claims are bullshit. "Faggotry Dolls?" What the
hell does that mean? Are you so STUPID that you forget I was married to a
WOMAN? The division was that she got her stuff including a large collection
of BREYER model horses, and I got mine. Some art works that have
considerable value. OH - and, DIPSHIT, you seem to forget that *I* got the
house. You keep leaving that part out of your bullshit.
>>> As you've admitted that you were cheating on her, why is this
>>> surprising?
>> Moore you remain and IDIOT. By the time our final hearing was held we
>>had been LEGALLY SEPARATED ( as one who THINKS of himself as a lawyer, you
>>should KNOW that a LEGAL SEPARATION removes the "cheating" issue. ) You DO
>>hold yourself out to be a LEGAL EXPERT to others.
> No, I don't. Although I am closer to being an attorney than you are, I've
> never claimed to be one.
Good then quit making LEGAL CLAIMS that are such BULLSHIT, Moore. There
was NO issue of "cheating" at all. We were "legally separated" and both of
us were free to have any relationships we wanted. Being the IDIOT that you
are Moore (thinking of yourself as a legal expert) adultery laws have pretty
much been abolished by the 21st century. I did not cheat on my ex-wife. She
had been gone for almost a year before I met my present wife. AND - Moore -
we didn't even meet in person for almost a year after we were introduced, I
still think you LACK the intellectual capacity to understand the formalities
of Spanish tradition. In YOUR world you meet a woman, blackmail her and
start forcing her have sex with you. In my case, however, we were chaperoned
right up to the time of the marriage. Moore you will always be a CLUELESS
FUKKKK! Socially GUTTER TRASH!
>> Now perhaps you can EXPLAIN "Legal Separation pending divorce?" You DO
>> know ALL the law in that
>>regard, right DAVEY?
> The law has nothing to do with it. It's morally wrong to be with someone
> else while you're still married. "Till death do us part" and all
> that....but then, you never were one for keeping your word.
Morally wrong? Well, Davey, giving you a VERY WIDE berth here, your
problem is that how one defines the word "WITH" in such a circumstance. In
know YOUR frame of reference. Pretty primal grunting. However the definition
of "intimate relations" was never met until we were legally married. I am
NOT the gutter trash that you ARE, Moore. Nor is my wife, no matter your
vile claims.
>> It is really amusing Davey I mean HILARIOUS that you
>>seem to ignore that by the time that hearing came up SHE was "shacking up"
>>with her then boyfriend
> I have no knowledge that she was doing so. Forgive me if I don't simply
> take your word for it.
If you read ALL the pleadings you'd have known that and who "MICHAEL"
was.
>>and I just wanted to be married to somebody else in
>>another country I was NOT shacking up with.
> Right, because you needed someone docile whom you could control.
Moore you are VASTLY too stupid to know how wrong you are. A Latina
"docile?" REALLY jerkoff? DOCILE? CONTROLLED? Does the name Lorena Bobbitt
mean anything to you? Any assclown looking for a "DOCILE" or "SUBMISSIVE"
woman who picks a Latina (particularly a Cubana) is in for one hell of a
rude shock. You never cease to display how utterly ignorant you are Moore
you often amaze me at the level of your ignorance.
There are many things that can be said about Latin women. The first is
their sheer beauty. But beyond that they are hardly the "dependent" type. If
you tried your shit on a Latin woman, Moore, it would just be a matter of
time before you would up with some of your portruding body parts either
missing or in your own mouth. You think you are such a badass with women.
Accept some firendly advice, don't try your shit with a Latin woman. But
maybe I should encourage to pull the same shit on a Latina you did on Linda.
You'd no longer be a pain in anyone's ass.
>>Your fukkekd up logic is AMAZING
>>Moore. It is the twisted logic of the psychopath. Actually I could no more
>>hold HER life against her than an IDIOT like you can hold mine against me.
> Odd that earlier today, Greg referred to you as a psychopath.
No he didn't.
freedom
>DAVID MOORE THE PANTYWAIST
>"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
>news:b012438d312f11af...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
>
>>>>>> The really hilarious part is that he claims to be this hotshot legal
>>>>>> consultant... and yet, he couldn't prevent his ex-wife from supposedly
>>>>>> dragging the case out for years, running up fees, etc.
>
>>>>> Moore in your VAST VAST VAST legal experience how does any party
>>>>> lock
>>>>>the courthouse door to the adverse party? How does one force the other
>>>>>party's lawyer to meet deadlines that are in black letter law, if
>>>>>contempt
>>>>>findings and fines don't do it? What does one do when the Judge is FIRED
>>>>>on
>>>>>the second day of trial?
>
>>>> A real legal professional would know the answer to these questions.
>>>> Times
>>>> like these, I'll bet you regret that you purchased your education
>>>> fraudulently?
>
>>> Because YOU have them on your hatesite? Sure! If they are dumb as a
>>>rock!!!
>
>
> You have CLAIMS on your hatesite Moore. But thanks for agreeing it IS a
>hatesite.
You can call it whatever you like :) The fact is, it's there, and you have
to deal with the ramifications. How many clients have you lost because of
it?
Nothing. If a judge leaves, a new one gets assigned that judge's cases.
You go in and appear before the new judge. It's not exactly rocket
science.
But then, for someone like you who probably didn't even complete high
school....
>
>> So, to recap: some attorney walked all over you, by missing a few
>> deadlines, in a simple divorce case which involved no children, no spousal
>> support, a rundown shack in Palm Harbor and a collection of faggoty dolls.
>> And yet, you expect people to hire you in cases involving child custody,
>> allegations of sexual abuse, psychological testing and criminal
>> accusations?
>
> Moore your recitation of facts reflects your deeply seated mental
>illness. The lawyer didn't miss "a few" deadlines, she didn't meet ANY
>deadlines. She was held in contempt repeatedly and fined for her contempt.
>After the case her unprofessional behavior resulted in a rebuke by the Bar,
>making her take remedial courses on professional conduct, and being told she
>was not welcome to practice law in that county again. The home was not a
>"rundown shack" Moore. Your claims are bullshit. "Faggotry Dolls?" What the
>hell does that mean? Are you so STUPID that you forget I was married to a
>WOMAN?
As I recall, YOU petitioned to get the dolls....ROFL
The division was that she got her stuff including a large collection
>of BREYER model horses, and I got mine. Some art works that have
>considerable value. OH - and, DIPSHIT, you seem to forget that *I* got the
>house. You keep leaving that part out of your bullshit.
>
>>>> As you've admitted that you were cheating on her, why is this
>>>> surprising?
>
>>> Moore you remain and IDIOT. By the time our final hearing was held we
>>>had been LEGALLY SEPARATED ( as one who THINKS of himself as a lawyer, you
>>>should KNOW that a LEGAL SEPARATION removes the "cheating" issue. ) You DO
>>>hold yourself out to be a LEGAL EXPERT to others.
>
>> No, I don't. Although I am closer to being an attorney than you are, I've
>> never claimed to be one.
>
> Good then quit making LEGAL CLAIMS that are such BULLSHIT, Moore. There
>was NO issue of "cheating" at all. We were "legally separated" and both of
>us were free to have any relationships we wanted. Being the IDIOT that you
>are Moore (thinking of yourself as a legal expert) adultery laws have pretty
>much been abolished by the 21st century. I did not cheat on my ex-wife. She
>had been gone for almost a year before I met my present wife.
You previously claimed that you began "courting" her in 2001. According to
Megan, she and Peggy "got out of there as fast as they could" in the late
summer of 2002. That's a years worth of adultery.
I don't really care.
>
>>>and I just wanted to be married to somebody else in
>>>another country I was NOT shacking up with.
>
>> Right, because you needed someone docile whom you could control.
>
> Moore you are VASTLY too stupid to know how wrong you are. A Latina
>"docile?" REALLY jerkoff? DOCILE? CONTROLLED? Does the name Lorena Bobbitt
>mean anything to you? Any assclown looking for a "DOCILE" or "SUBMISSIVE"
>woman who picks a Latina (particularly a Cubana) is in for one hell of a
>rude shock. You never cease to display how utterly ignorant you are Moore
>you often amaze me at the level of your ignorance.
>
> There are many things that can be said about Latin women. The first is
>their sheer beauty. But beyond that they are hardly the "dependent" type. If
>you tried your shit on a Latin woman, Moore, it would just be a matter of
>time before you would up with some of your portruding body parts either
>missing or in your own mouth. You think you are such a badass with women.
>Accept some firendly advice, don't try your shit with a Latin woman. But
>maybe I should encourage to pull the same shit on a Latina you did on Linda.
>You'd no longer be a pain in anyone's ass.
I've never "pulled" anything on anyone named "Linda," as I've never known
anyone by that name.
>
>
>
>>>Your fukkekd up logic is AMAZING
>>>Moore. It is the twisted logic of the psychopath. Actually I could no more
>>>hold HER life against her than an IDIOT like you can hold mine against me.
>
>> Odd that earlier today, Greg referred to you as a psychopath.
>
> No he didn't.
Yes, he did. He stated that using a random, unrelated photograph to
"prove" a claim is the act of a "psychopath." As you originated this
tactic, he must have been referring to you.
krp
"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
I am sure I have lost a couple, Davey, but they wre not clients I would
have wanted anyway. Anybody who would believe your BULLSHIT without checking
further deserves what they will get when they seek help elsewhere and get
screwed. I have even gotten a couple phone calls from people telling me they
wish they had NOT paid attention to you.
Moore in your EXPERT LEGAL OPINION do you think they just SEND IN a new
Judge to take over? Do you think it is like basball where they have judges
sitting on the bench waiting to be called up to substitute? Smith you are in
for Cope. REALOLY Davey, in your LAW PRACTICE do you see lots of that? How
long, IN YOUR EEXPERT LEGAL OPINION do you think it took at assign the case
to another judge? Here's a HINT - MORON. We had to wait 4 months for the
governor to appoint a temporary replacement. And then another 6 months
before the trial. But YOU would have handled it HOW?
> But then, for someone like you who probably didn't even complete high
> school....
Keep on trying Davey. So tell us HOW - you would have handled it. You
think you are much more of a "HOTSHOT consultant than I am. How wouold
ATTORNEY DAVID MOORE have handled it? Should we have gone on without a
Judge? OR mayybe in your drug deluded mind maybe you think I should have
gotten up and proclaimed myself to be a "HOTSHOT" and presided over my own
divorce? That's the way you think they work, right Davey?
>>> So, to recap: some attorney walked all over you, by missing a few
>>> deadlines, in a simple divorce case which involved no children, no
>>> spousal
>>> support, a rundown shack in Palm Harbor and a collection of faggoty
>>> dolls.
>>> And yet, you expect people to hire you in cases involving child custody,
>>> allegations of sexual abuse, psychological testing and criminal
>>> accusations?
>> Moore your recitation of facts reflects your deeply seated mental
>>illness. The lawyer didn't miss "a few" deadlines, she didn't meet ANY
>>deadlines. She was held in contempt repeatedly and fined for her contempt.
>>After the case her unprofessional behavior resulted in a rebuke by the
>>Bar,
>>making her take remedial courses on professional conduct, and being told
>>she
>>was not welcome to practice law in that county again. The home was not a
>>"rundown shack" Moore. Your claims are bullshit. "Faggotry Dolls?" What
>>the
>>hell does that mean? Are you so STUPID that you forget I was married to a
>>WOMAN?
> As I recall, YOU petitioned to get the dolls....ROFL
BAD MEMORY DAVEY.
NOT at all what I said Davey. You make shit up.
You NEVER care about the truth or FACTS, Moore just your scurrilous
claims.
>>>>and I just wanted to be married to somebody else in
>>>>another country I was NOT shacking up with.
>>
>>> Right, because you needed someone docile whom you could control.
>>
>> Moore you are VASTLY too stupid to know how wrong you are. A Latina
>>"docile?" REALLY jerkoff? DOCILE? CONTROLLED? Does the name Lorena Bobbitt
>>mean anything to you? Any assclown looking for a "DOCILE" or "SUBMISSIVE"
>>woman who picks a Latina (particularly a Cubana) is in for one hell of a
>>rude shock. You never cease to display how utterly ignorant you are Moore
>>you often amaze me at the level of your ignorance.
>>
>> There are many things that can be said about Latin women. The first is
>>their sheer beauty. But beyond that they are hardly the "dependent" type.
>>If
>>you tried your shit on a Latin woman, Moore, it would just be a matter of
>>time before you would up with some of your portruding body parts either
>>missing or in your own mouth. You think you are such a badass with women.
>>Accept some firendly advice, don't try your shit with a Latin woman. But
>>maybe I should encourage to pull the same shit on a Latina you did on
>>Linda.
>>You'd no longer be a pain in anyone's ass.
> I've never "pulled" anything on anyone named "Linda," as I've never known
> anyone by that name.
Your second wife. The woman you were boiking that got your first wife to
divorce you. Actually the cause of you being cashiered from the Marine
Corps. OH WAIT, that was the "OTHER" David Moore, YOU were never a Marine
and never stationed at 29 Palms, right Davey? <chuckle>
>>>>Your fukkekd up logic is AMAZING
>>>>Moore. It is the twisted logic of the psychopath. Actually I could no
>>>>more
>>>>hold HER life against her than an IDIOT like you can hold mine against
>>>>me.
>>
>>> Odd that earlier today, Greg referred to you as a psychopath.
>> No he didn't.
> Yes, he did.
No, Davey. YOU did.
Kent Wills
wrote:
[Snips for brevity]
>>> You have CLAIMS on your hatesite Moore. But thanks for agreeing it IS
>>> a
>>>hatesite.
>
>> You can call it whatever you like :) The fact is, it's there, and you
>> have
>> to deal with the ramifications. How many clients have you lost because
>> of
>> it?
>
> I am sure I have lost a couple,
It's almost a certainty.
I still think your proving, almost daily, that you're incompetent
has done more damage. Sadly, I know of no way to find out which has
caused your business the most damage.
>Davey, but they wre not clients I would
>have wanted anyway. Anybody who would believe your BULLSHIT without checking
>further deserves what they will get when they seek help elsewhere and get
>screwed. I have even gotten a couple phone calls from people telling me they
>wish they had NOT paid attention to you.
>
Riiiiight.
David offers links to your posts archived on Google. People can
check the accuracy and context with great ease.
[...]
>>>
>>> YOU are thr one playing LEGAL EXPERT here Moore. What should I have
>>>done about a Judge who had gotten himself into his own legal problems? As
>>>a
>>>"HOTSHOT" I mean? As a "HOTSHOT" what would YOU have done in your VAST
>>>LEGAL
>>>EXPERTISE? Judges on cases here are assigned on rotation. You don't get to
>>>pick your own judge. So, Davey, what do you claim I should have done about
>>>it?
>
>> Nothing. If a judge leaves, a new one gets assigned that judge's cases.
>> You go in and appear before the new judge. It's not exactly rocket
>> science.
>
> Moore in your EXPERT LEGAL OPINION do you think they just SEND IN a new
>Judge to take over? Do you think it is like basball where they have judges
>sitting on the bench waiting to be called up to substitute? Smith you are in
>for Cope. REALOLY Davey, in your LAW PRACTICE do you see lots of that? How
>long, IN YOUR EEXPERT LEGAL OPINION do you think it took at assign the case
>to another judge? Here's a HINT - MORON. We had to wait 4 months for the
>governor to appoint a temporary replacement. And then another 6 months
>before the trial. But YOU would have handled it HOW?
OMG! Are you so drunk you think anyone will buy that you are so
important the Governor stepped in to appoint a new judge?
No one is going to accept that you're so important the Governor
of the state of Florida had to step in to appoint a temp.
>
>> But then, for someone like you who probably didn't even complete high
>> school....
>
> Keep on trying Davey. So tell us HOW - you would have handled it. You
>think you are much more of a "HOTSHOT consultant than I am.
Given the NUMEROUS alcohol induced errors you make, most anyone
would be.
>How wouold
>ATTORNEY DAVID MOORE have handled it? Should we have gone on without a
>Judge? OR mayybe in your drug deluded mind maybe you think I should have
>gotten up and proclaimed myself to be a "HOTSHOT" and presided over my own
>divorce? That's the way you think they work, right Davey?
He could always claim the Governor got involved, as you claim for
your case.
>
>>>> So, to recap: some attorney walked all over you, by missing a few
>>>> deadlines, in a simple divorce case which involved no children, no
>>>> spousal
>>>> support, a rundown shack in Palm Harbor and a collection of faggoty
>>>> dolls.
>>>> And yet, you expect people to hire you in cases involving child custody,
>>>> allegations of sexual abuse, psychological testing and criminal
>>>> accusations?
>
>>> Moore your recitation of facts reflects your deeply seated mental
>>>illness. The lawyer didn't miss "a few" deadlines, she didn't meet ANY
>>>deadlines. She was held in contempt repeatedly and fined for her contempt.
>>>After the case her unprofessional behavior resulted in a rebuke by the
>>>Bar,
>>>making her take remedial courses on professional conduct, and being told
>>>she
>>>was not welcome to practice law in that county again. The home was not a
>>>"rundown shack" Moore. Your claims are bullshit. "Faggotry Dolls?" What
>>>the
>>>hell does that mean? Are you so STUPID that you forget I was married to a
>>>WOMAN?
>
>> As I recall, YOU petitioned to get the dolls....ROFL
>
> BAD MEMORY DAVEY.
Not really.
Don't feel too bad. I have a large collection of Xuxa material,
including several of the Xuxa dolls made to promote her English
language show. While they aren't worth a great deal, I would want to
keep them.
Fortunately, there is no reason for me to worry.
[...]
>>>>>hold yourself out to be a LEGAL EXPERT to others.
>>>
>>>> No, I don't. Although I am closer to being an attorney than you are,
>>>> I've
>>>> never claimed to be one.
>
>>> Good then quit making LEGAL CLAIMS that are such BULLSHIT, Moore.
>>> There
>>>was NO issue of "cheating" at all. We were "legally separated" and both of
>>>us were free to have any relationships we wanted. Being the IDIOT that you
>>>are Moore (thinking of yourself as a legal expert) adultery laws have
>>>pretty
>>>much been abolished by the 21st century. I did not cheat on my ex-wife.
>>>She
>>>had been gone for almost a year before I met my present wife.
>
>> You previously claimed that you began "courting" her in 2001. According
>> to
>> Megan, she and Peggy "got out of there as fast as they could" in the late
>> summer of 2002. That's a years worth of adultery.
>
> NOT at all what I said Davey. You make shit up.
That's EXACTLY what you posted, Pangborn.
You may have been lying, of course.
[...]
>>>
>>>>> It is really amusing Davey I mean HILARIOUS that you
>>>>>seem to ignore that by the time that hearing came up SHE was "shacking
>>>>>up"
>>>>>with her then boyfriend
>>>
>>>> I have no knowledge that she was doing so. Forgive me if I don't simply
>>>> take your word for it.
>>>
>>> If you read ALL the pleadings you'd have known that and who "MICHAEL"
>>>was.
>
>> I don't really care.
>
> You NEVER care about the truth or FACTS, Moore just your scurrilous
>claims.
Project much? [Hint: you do.]
[...]
>
>> I've never "pulled" anything on anyone named "Linda," as I've never known
>> anyone by that name.
>
> Your second wife.
His current (and second) wife is not named Linda, or any variation
of such. Yes, I do KNOW. No I won't give you her name, unless you
give me $50,000,000.00 in guarantied funds. Do that and I'll give you
EVERYTHING I know about the guy. His address, phone number, etc.
Yes, the information will be out of date very quickly, but it
will be valid at the time I give it.
He'd better do the same regarding me and mine if someone gives
him that much money.
>The woman you were boiking that got your first wife to
>divorce you. Actually the cause of you being cashiered from the Marine
>Corps.
So you LIED when you made the FACT CLAIM that it was because he
ran away from the enemy? You either lied then or you're lying now.
There's no way both of your claims can be true.
>OH WAIT, that was the "OTHER" David Moore, YOU were never a Marine
>and never stationed at 29 Palms, right Davey? <chuckle>
He wasn't at 29 Palms.
I posted evidence that the David Moore from 29 Palms was still
there in 2004. Nearly a decade after he moved, according to you.
>
>>>>>Your fukkekd up logic is AMAZING
>>>>>Moore. It is the twisted logic of the psychopath. Actually I could no
>>>>>more
>>>>>hold HER life against her than an IDIOT like you can hold mine against
>>>>>me.
>>>
>>>> Odd that earlier today, Greg referred to you as a psychopath.
>
>>> No he didn't.
>
>> Yes, he did.
>
> No, Davey. YOU did.
Greg did, dullard. You may be so drunk you think David and Greg
are the same person, but they are not.
"CPS cases are legal matters. Offering advice IS practicing law
without a license."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn admitting he practices law without a
license in misc.legal