MED: Typo: RE: (Part 4 of 4) Results from 10 ME/CFS surveys from the past and a request for further information

[Tom Kindlon]

Typo:

<snip>
>CBT had a lower rate of adverse reactions compared to the
>rates seen in other surveys. This may be because CBT in the
>US

is not

> currently simply based on GET - there are different forms
>offered some which might encourage the pacing of activities.
>However this might change if information from the form of CBT
>that tends to be used in the UK and the Netherlands is
>highlighted by the CDC.
>
>CBT
>160 respondents
>Helped a lot: 48 (30.0%)
>Helped a little: 60 (37.5%)
>No effect: 38 (23.8%)
>Harmful: 16 (10.0%).
>
>The treatment with the best results was Pacing of activities.
>It had the lowest rate of adverse reactions (1/601 or 0.2%)
>and the highest helpful percentage (i.e. the sum of the
>percentages for helped a little and helped a lot)
>
>Pacing
>601 respondents
>Helped a lot: 423 (70.4%)
>Helped a little: 167 (27.8%)
>No effect: 20 (3.3%)
>Harmful: 1 (0.2%).
>
>==================