Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

art vs science

1 view
Skip to first unread message

x

unread,
May 17, 2013, 11:53:15 AM5/17/13
to
a lot of my ideas seem to be repeated in modern music and art and crazy
shenanigans but it is rare to see much in modern knowledge...or is
it....? to be honest i have made a determined effort to ignore quantum
physics and new age books for a long time, although i couldn't help some
(both usually coming together in an east-west scrap heap / synthesis).

think about what the psychedelic visual extension of music we are all
used to these days owes to dr who, or apparently so..it won't be long
before they all realize it and you'll be seeing dr whos head everywhere,
behind all the music no matter what the genre. he'll take over "VUSIC".

and how will the theory of the cube as a framework for multiple knowledge
systems and it's application in every realm trumped by fourth dimensional
vortex spiritual cognition/reality (the timespace fluff) not refer to him?

i see dr who being taken seriously by chimpanzees being turned into worms.

may just be a fantasy but i like to entertain the possibility i am right..

x

unread,
May 17, 2013, 12:19:44 PM5/17/13
to
"nobody here gets out alive" jim morrison

art over war or war over art?

Wet Paper Bag

unread,
May 17, 2013, 1:49:47 PM5/17/13
to
On 17 May, 09:53, x <x...@x.org> wrote:

> and how will the theory of the cube as a framework for multiple knowledge
> systems and it's application in every realm trumped by fourth dimensional
> vortex spiritual cognition/reality (the timespace fluff) not refer to him?

the cube is not a framework. the cube is simply a mathematical
expression of "every possible combination" of 30 characters. the point
being to reduce the characters down to the breath or to continue to
add characters... which as you know, with each new character and whole
new array of haystacks to find that one needle... why confuse things
with more?

further, in terms of the fourth diemensional terms... again hinton
gives the very best explaination but as always, crafty sort, he leaves
out the naturally drawn conclusion allowing the student to see for
himself what it is rather than what is appears to be...

as per our recent example... it was not until i declared liaM winner
did both you and liaM react... a trick? no. a game remember? you want
to play a game with me... i am a teacher. this is school and
interactivity is the aim... keeps you learning in spite of yourself...
but again this is above...

oblivious below... can you master being oblivious? then i will see and
we will react... that is the secrety of this society... no clucking...
but do not get all huffy puffy dude... look at it for what it is. what
happened. that is the conclusion of which any thing i could say would
only confuse or pideon hole it into my experience.

if the body is a machine like doctor Jew thinks... there is no
possible way... ever!...that i could teach or convince you, nor is it
possible for you to learn, unlearn or know that 1+1 is 2. no wait...
is it three?

but i could, as so many of those asshole head doctors do, see what
happens when i put a cigarette butt out on a schizophrenics arm...
what happens when i dunk a crazy person (or not) into a tak of sub-
zero water... lock you in a dark room for three days... feed you
nothing raw meat... lie to you to create one context and then lie to
your family to create another... electro shock theapy to see what
happens when we almost electricute you... to reset/reboot your
brain... but why do you not forget?

your belief system has not changed and any such primative, crude and
cruel devices ultimately force you to ask why you are here and it all
comes flooding back... you are being persecuted for your beliefs in a
world that is crazy... thus it reinforces doctor... now put down your
instruments of torture before i introduce you to some real pain...
that is just sick man... and they call it medicine... and you are
sick... ghost sick... odorless, colorless, not tangable...
imaginary... and the drug dealers have you hooked...

and now that you are effectively marginailze? a politcal or religious
of cult prisoner... you are my bitch... if i am having a bad day, i
violently abuse you... a good day... sexual abuse...

zen can not be talked about in advance, unless you are trying to build
an electric charge to release at the first availble and suitable
lightening rod... like running at a door to knock it down and at the
last second someone ones it...

three swords.

first dimension. sharpness. so we set them left to right from sharpest
to dullest.

now here is the rub... next dimension (quality)... brightness... "from
the existing fixed matrix... sharpness... (x)" we add a dimension up
(y) of brightness... then a third dimension is added... weight (z)...
yet again, what is shown, like two pair in yahtzee every time, is that
the sowrd does not move from its fixed matrix sharpness, then a second
dimension brightness is added but the swords do not move... then
weight... but the swords are not moving or changing position see?

on a standard piece of graph paper then he states that although we may
draw a one dimensional line, on a two dimensional surface representing
a three diemsnional object on an x,y,z set of axis... when we add a
fourth quality, and without moving any swords... that is the fourth
dimension... and perhaps fifth, sixth 7th... who knows how many
distinguishing qualities we can observe in that elephant?

so your hypothesis, that there are multi-knowledge systems is false...
alchemically, between fire and water there is a generative principle,
an insulting principle, a destructive principle... mercury, sulphur
and salt... you are focused on the things that react, no excpetions to
Laws that are invisible... the Law is a single knowledge system of
which many believe can be eaten with just one bite... the cube as a
multi-knowledge system, ways of observing a moment,... after all, what
is effecting your observation, thinking, concluding?

there are only three swords. however, according to the cube, at this
very moment, you are reading, writing, fighting, working, fucking,
eating, shitting, brushing your teeth.... the cube says so... but is
it possible? not without time to sort it out... and that mathematical
formula expressing every possible combination lacks the singular first
dimension being time... it comes without effort, a flash , a thought
entire... unfortunately, or otherwise, you can not read the cube all
at once or in only one sitting.

according to scientific method then, you must now restate the
hypothesis...

Lucifer



0 new messages