Re: Sarah Palin - Certified Right Wing Nutjon
Steve Carroll
<50e84a29-f506-4973...@s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
ed <ne...@atwistedweb.com> wrote:
> On Sep 4, 9:59 am, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> > "ed" <n...@atwistedweb.com> stated in post
> > 72ab3925-a876-4b57-8f7f-66091cbd5...@s1g2000pra.googlegroups.com on
> > 9/4/08
> > 2:37 AM:
> > > On Sep 4, 2:11 am, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> > >> "ed" <n...@atwistedweb.com> stated in post
> > >> 23b96b88-a7ed-4a4d-bb6e-5276cf08c...@w39g2000prb.googlegroups.com on
> > >> 9/4/08
> > > <snip>
> > >>>> I bet this never hits the media as strongly as things that happened
> > >>>> at
> > >>>> Obama's ex-church.
> >
> > >>> this isn't nearly as interesting a story in any way, shape, or form
> > >>> as
> > >>> all the rhetoric from rev. wright.
> >
> > >> Whacky things the VP candidate says should be *at least* as
> > >> interesting
> > >> as
> > >> whacky things people merely associated with a Prez. candidate has
> > >> said.
> >
> > > oh c'mon, you think a politician preaching to the choir, as it were,
> > > is at least as interesting a news story as a presidential candidates
> > > 'spiritual advisor' saying things like the gov't invented aids for the
> > > genocide of black people? you've got a seriously whacked perspective
> > > on what politicians NORMALLY say (preaching to the choir is par for
> > > the course), and what the media finds interesting.
> >
> > We have two "stories":
> >
> > 1) Someone merely associated with a politician saying things that are
> > whacked. There is *no* indication the politician agrees with a single
> > one
> > of those "whacked" things and plenty of evidence he does not.
> >
> > 2) A politician *saying* whacked things herself.
> >
> > I would say it is clear that #2 is the far bigger story.
>
> it's not. :P go and google some things that obama has said w/ regard
> to god- "The prayer that I tell myself every night is a fairly simple
> one...that I am an instrument of God's will. I'm constantly trying to
> align myself to what I think he calls on me to do. And sometimes you
> hear it strongly and sometimes that voice is more muted." it's very
> much along the same line as what palin was saying, is 'whacked' from
> the perspective of a non-christian, and the media (and the country in
> general) doesn't really care.
>
>
> > >>>> I do like the right wing talking heads on radio saying it is not a
> > >>>> big
> > >>>> deal
> > >>>> for under age teens to get pregnant. Er? Suddenly this is OK to
> > >>>> them?
> >
> > >>> i've heard plenty of talking heads (right and left) say that this is
> > >>> a
> > >>> common mistake / problem / issue that many families face, but i've
> > >>> not
> > >>> heard any say it's "ok" for unmarried teens to be getting knocked
> > >>> up.
> > >>> who have you heard say it was ok?
> >
> > >> Sean Hannity tonight.
> >
> > > so what did he say?
> >
> > He was going on showing acceptance of teen pregnancy. For the Palin
> > family.
> > Suddenly teen pregnancy is OK... as long as you are a part of a
> > prominent
> > Republican family.
>
> i doubt he said that- maybe some support for your statement?
>
> > >> Looking online I do see comments from some others about teen
> > >> pregnancy:
> >
> > >> Rush Limbaugh:
> >
> > >> --Rush Limbaugh reacting to the news in December 2007 that
> > >> teen actress Jamie Lynn Spears was pregnant
> >
> > >> CALLER: Would you tend to think that a family in this
> > >> position, though, wouldn't you think that there would be a
> > >> more watchful eye as a parent to be watching over these kids
> > >> so this doesn't happen to them?
> >
> > >> RUSH: I would certainly hope so, but it's long past time for
> > >> this to happen. The parents here are the culprits!
> >
> > > i don't agree w/ rush much, but in that specific instance, i'm not
> > > sure many folks would disagree! but specific to the palin kid, a
> > > quick googling shows that he's referring to it as a mistake, and does
> > > not say that it's "ok" for unmarried teens to get knocked up.
> >
> > The mistake is ok for the Palin's - nothing to get worked up over. For
> > the
> > Spears' family, though, it shows that the *parents* are wrong. The
> > parents.
> > Hmmm, who is the now-famous parent of the Palin teen who made this
> > mistake.
> >
> > He is being completely hypocritical. Remember Clinton's presidency?
> > Remember how importance character *was* to Rush? Man, it mattered
> > then...
> > bit now he supports a presidential candidate who he - if he was
> > consistent
> > -
> > would be *blaming* for a teen pregnancy.
>
> your logic is flawed- just because you blame bad parenting for someone
> getting knocked up does not mean you would blame bad parenting for
> someone else getting knocked up. i don't think anyone disagrees that
> bad parenting contributes to teens being more likely to get knocked
> up, but good parenting does not gurantee it won't happen.
>
> <snip>
> > >> Laura Schlessinger:
> > >> I feel sorry for children who are robbed of their childhoods
> > >> of innocence by parents who are negligent or voyeuristic. I
> > >> feel sorry for the unborn baby, whose precious life is bound
> > >> to be a toy in the hands of these young people.
> >
> > > i have no problem with that statement either; there's no way to know
> > > whether that statement does, or does not, apply to the palin family.
> >
> > Of course it does *not*.
>
> "directed to" and "applies to" are two different things, so i don't
> know why you would say "of course it does *not*" apply to the palin
> family. and if you in fact agree that it "of course" does not apply
> to them, your argument is moot. :P
>
> > It is directed to someone other than a prominent
> > Republican family. She would *never* say that about the Palin's.
> > >> Do you think *either* of them will speak the same way about the Palin
> > >> family
> > >> as they did the Spears' family? Surely not...
> >
> > > you seem to be under the assumption that the two situations are
> > > comparable- i have no idea if they are or not, but i surely wouldn't
> > > go in with the assumption that they are. sometimes good families
> > > raise bad apples, and bad families good ones. but bad families do
> > > tend to raise more bad apples. the spears' family... *seems* to fall
> > > on the inbred-hick-side of the orchard. i have no idea if the palin's
> > > are a good family or not, but there's no reason to think they're not
> > > just because they had a horny teenage daughter.
> >
> > The above right wingers were not talking about other aspects of the
> > Spears'
> > family - they were talking about a teen pregnancy.
>
> if the other aspects of the spear's family were not well known, it
> would be unlikely that they would be talking about it.
>
> > And you can bet they
> > will *not* talk about the Palin's teen pregnancy in the same way. No
> > way,
> > no how. Not going to happen.
>
> nor should they- the palin's do not have a national reputation for
> being trailer trash, and until shown otherwise, should not be talked
> about as such.
>
> > >> for the Palin's it is clearly
> > >> OK because, well,
> >
> > > again, you haven't supported the assertion that anyone says it's "ok"
> > > for teenagers to be getting knocked up. good family or bad, it's not
> > > really an ok thing, and i haven't heard anyone suggest otherwise.
> >
> > They clearly are saying the "mistake" is OK... just a part of American
> > life
> > in the 21st century.
>
> for a strong, supportive family (which the palin's may or may not be),
> it very well may be an "ok" thing- if ok means sh!t happens, but we'll
> deal with it and everything will turn out ok. for many others, it's
> much less ok, in that they can't support the kids, they're unfit to be
> parents, they just show bad judgement all around, etc, etc.
>
> > >> they are Republicans. The sexual indiscretions of Palin's
> > >> are fine... but of Clinton's and Spears' they are not.
> >
> > > the spears', the main problem is that it appears they are trailer
> > > trash. and there are plenty of trailer trash republicans, so that
> > > explanation of yours don't cut it.
> >
> > Teen pregnancy is the topic here... or, specifically, how many
> > conservatives
> > speak about it one way when it comes to some people and a very different
> > way
> > when it comes to the family of a prominent Republican.
>
> why would you NOT speak of different circumstances in different ways?
> people are NOT all the same.
Here's a better question:
Why is Snit talking about *other* people being hypocrites?
--
"Apple is pushing how green this is - but it [Macbook Air] is
clearly disposable... when the battery dies you can pretty much
just throw it away". - Snit
Steve Carroll
"John" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
> "Steve Carroll" <troll...@TK.com> wrote in message
> news:trollkiller-DFA5...@newsgroups.comcast.net...
> > In article
> > <72ab3925-a876-4b57...@s1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>,
> > ed <ne...@atwistedweb.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sep 4, 2:11 am, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> >> > "ed" <n...@atwistedweb.com> stated in post
> >> > 23b96b88-a7ed-4a4d-bb6e-5276cf08c...@w39g2000prb.googlegroups.com on
> >> > 9/4/08
> >> <snip>
> >> > >> I bet this never hits the media as strongly as things that
> >> > >> happened
> >> > >> at
> >> > >> Obama's ex-church.
> >> >
> >> > > this isn't nearly as interesting a story in any way, shape, or form
> >> > > as
> >> > > all the rhetoric from rev. wright.
> >> >
> >> > Whacky things the VP candidate says should be *at least* as
> >> > interesting
> >> > as
> >> > whacky things people merely associated with a Prez. candidate has
> >> > said.
> >>
> >> oh c'mon, you think a politician preaching to the choir, as it were,
> >> is at least as interesting a news story as a presidential candidates
> >> 'spiritual advisor' saying things like the gov't invented aids for the
> >> genocide of black people? you've got a seriously whacked perspective
> >> on what politicians NORMALLY say (preaching to the choir is par for
> >> the course), and what the media finds interesting.
> >>
> >> > >> I do like the right wing talking heads on radio saying it is not a
> >> > >> big
> >> > >> deal
> >> > >> for under age teens to get pregnant. Er? Suddenly this is OK to
> >> > >> them?
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >> > > i've heard plenty of talking heads (right and left) say that this
> >> > > is
> >> > > a
> >> > > common mistake / problem / issue that many families face, but i've
> >> > > not
> >> > > heard any say it's "ok" for unmarried teens to be getting knocked
> >> > > up.
> >> > > who have you heard say it was ok?
> >> >
> >> > Sean Hannity tonight.
> >>
> >> so what did he say?
> >>
> >> > Looking online I do see comments from some others about teen
> >> > pregnancy:
> >> >
> >> > Rush Limbaugh:
> >> >
> >> > --Rush Limbaugh reacting to the news in December 2007 that
> >> > teen actress Jamie Lynn Spears was pregnant
> >> >
> >> > CALLER: Would you tend to think that a family in this
> >> > position, though, wouldn't you think that there would be a
> >> > more watchful eye as a parent to be watching over these kids
> >> > so this doesn't happen to them?
> >> >
> >> > RUSH: I would certainly hope so, but it's long past time for
> >> > this to happen. The parents here are the culprits!
> >>
> >> i don't agree w/ rush much, but in that specific instance, i'm not
> >> sure many folks would disagree! but specific to the palin kid, a
> >> quick googling shows that he's referring to it as a mistake, and does
> >> not say that it's "ok" for unmarried teens to get knocked up.
> >
> >
> > Oh c'mon... you didn't actually expect Snit to comprehend what he read,
> > did you?
> >
> >> > Laura Schlessinger:
> >> > I feel sorry for children who are robbed of their childhoods
> >> > of innocence by parents who are negligent or voyeuristic. I
> >> > feel sorry for the unborn baby, whose precious life is bound
> >> > to be a toy in the hands of these young people.
> >>
> >> i have no problem with that statement either; there's no way to know
> >> whether that statement does, or does not, apply to the palin family.
> >>
> >> > Do you think *either* of them will speak the same way about the Palin
> >> > family
> >> > as they did the Spears' family? Surely not...
> >>
> >> you seem to be under the assumption that the two situations are
> >> comparable- i have no idea if they are or not, but i surely wouldn't
> >> go in with the assumption that they are. sometimes good families
> >> raise bad apples, and bad families good ones. but bad families do
> >> tend to raise more bad apples. the spears' family... *seems* to fall
> >> on the inbred-hick-side of the orchard. i have no idea if the palin's
> >> are a good family or not, but there's no reason to think they're not
> >> just because they had a horny teenage daughter.
> >>
> >> > for the Palin's it is clearly
> >> > OK because, well,
> >>
> >> again, you haven't supported the assertion that anyone says it's "ok"
> >> for teenagers to be getting knocked up. good family or bad, it's not
> >> really an ok thing, and i haven't heard anyone suggest otherwise.
> >
> > Correct, you've only heard Snit disingenuously suggest it as he
> > pretended
> > it
> > came from the mouth of a "Certified Right Wing Nutjon".
> >
> >> > they are Republicans. The sexual indiscretions of Palin's
> >> > are fine... but of Clinton's and Spears' they are not.
> >>
> >> the spears', the main problem is that it appears they are trailer
> >> trash. and there are plenty of trailer trash republicans, so that
> >> explanation of yours don't cut it.
> >>
> >> > I have heard Liberals talking about the hypocrisy on the right on
> >> > this
> >> > "issue" but I have not heard any actually making an issue of the
> >> > pregnancy
> >> > itself nor the situation surrounding it.
> >>
> >> it's political of course- how would liberals make an issue out of it
> >> without knocking their own candidate's mom (something you probably
> >> don't want to do if you're a political strategist), given obama's own
> >> mom was unwed when she got knocked up w/ obama?
> >
> >
> > LOL! And let's not forget about the 'Certified Left Wing Nutjon's' that
> > are
> > whining because they don't feel Palin will have time for the job... you
> > know,
> > being that she has 5 kids an' all (but it's OK for men with kids?). Gee,
> > something in their previous stances about equality for women seems to
> > have
> > fallen off a bit. Here's a telling lie from a male hypocrite on the
> > topic:
> >
> > "You, not I, are the one who was embarrassed about doing "women's work".
> >
> > Notably, I didn't used the term "women's work" until this hypocrite used
> > it...
> > nor did I ever say anything about being "embarrassed" about doing any
> > kind
> > of
> > work to anyone at any time. You might have an idea who this person is;)
> >
> > --
> > "Apple is pushing how green this is - but it [Macbook Air] is
> > clearly disposable... when the battery dies you can pretty much
> > just throw it away". - Snit
>
>
> LOL Steve. You are just another NUTJOB!!!
So... you believe that Palin's 80+% approval rating was created by a state
full
of 'NUTJOBS'? Why do I feel like you *must* be faking this kind of idiocy?
Steve Carroll
Steve Carroll
"Steve Carroll" <troll...@TK.com> wrote:
Snit, please stop forging my posting ID just because I point out what a lying,
disingenuous, sh*t sack of a hypocrite you are.
Thanks.
Steve Carroll
Steve Carroll
news:1KWdnTVqePQC913V...@giganews.com
> "Steve Carroll" <troll...@TK.com> wrote in message
>> In article <qZadnanQzdwnhF3V...@giganews.com>,
>> "John" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "Steve Carroll" <troll...@TK.com> wrote in message
>>> news:trollkiller-DFA5...@newsgroups.comcast.net...
>>>> In article
>>>>>>>> not a
>>>>>>>> big
>>>>>>>> deal
>>>>>>>> for under age teens to get pregnant. Er? Suddenly this is OK to
>>>>>>>> them?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> i've heard plenty of talking heads (right and left) say that
>>>>>>> this is
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> common mistake / problem / issue that many families face, but
>>>>>>> i've not
>>>>>>> heard any say it's "ok" for unmarried teens to be getting
>>>>>>> knocked up.
>>>>>>> who have you heard say it was ok?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sean Hannity tonight.
>>>>>
>>>>> so what did he say?
>>>>>
>>>>>> pregnancy:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rush Limbaugh:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Rush Limbaugh reacting to the news in December 2007 that
>>>>>> teen actress Jamie Lynn Spears was pregnant
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CALLER: Would you tend to think that a family in this
>>>>>> position, though, wouldn't you think that there would be a
>>>>>> more watchful eye as a parent to be watching over these kids
>>>>>> so this doesn't happen to them?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> RUSH: I would certainly hope so, but it's long past time for
>>>>>> this to happen. The parents here are the culprits!
>>>>>
>>>>> i don't agree w/ rush much, but in that specific instance, i'm not
>>>>> sure many folks would disagree! but specific to the palin kid, a
>>>>> quick googling shows that he's referring to it as a mistake, and
>>>>> does not say that it's "ok" for unmarried teens to get knocked up.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> read, did you?
>>>>
>>>>>> I feel sorry for children who are robbed of their childhoods
>>>>>> of innocence by parents who are negligent or voyeuristic. I
>>>>>> feel sorry for the unborn baby, whose precious life is bound
>>>>>> to be a toy in the hands of these young people.
>>>>>
>>>>> i have no problem with that statement either; there's no way to
>>>>> know whether that statement does, or does not, apply to the palin
>>>>> family.
>>>>>> Palin
>>>>>> family
>>>>>> as they did the Spears' family? Surely not...
>>>>>
>>>>> you seem to be under the assumption that the two situations are
>>>>> comparable- i have no idea if they are or not, but i surely
>>>>> wouldn't go in with the assumption that they are. sometimes good
>>>>> families raise bad apples, and bad families good ones. but bad
>>>>> families do tend to raise more bad apples. the spears' family...
>>>>> *seems* to fall on the inbred-hick-side of the orchard. i have
>>>>> no idea if the palin's are a good family or not, but there's no
>>>>> reason to think they're not just because they had a horny teenage
>>>>> daughter.
>>>>>> OK because, well,
>>>>>
>>>>> again, you haven't supported the assertion that anyone says it's
>>>>> "ok" for teenagers to be getting knocked up. good family or bad,
>>>>> it's not really an ok thing, and i haven't heard anyone suggest
>>>>> otherwise.
>>>>
>>>> pretended
>>>> it
>>>> came from the mouth of a "Certified Right Wing Nutjon".
>>>>
>>>>>> are fine... but of Clinton's and Spears' they are not.
>>>>>
>>>>> the spears', the main problem is that it appears they are trailer
>>>>> trash. and there are plenty of trailer trash republicans, so that
>>>>> explanation of yours don't cut it.
>>>>>
>>>> "Apple is pushing how green this is - but it [Macbook Air] is
>>>> clearly disposable... when the battery dies you can pretty much
>>>> just throw it away". - Snit
>>>
>>>
>>
>> So... you believe that Palin's 80+% approval rating was created by a
>> state full
>> of 'NUTJOBS'? Why do I feel like you *must* be faking this kind of
>> "Apple is pushing how green this is - but it [Macbook Air] is
>> clearly disposable... when the battery dies you can pretty much
>> just throw it away". - Snit
>>
>
>
> mess he made.
You are responding to Snit you asshole. He is again forging me as he has
admitted to doing in the past.
Steve Carroll
"John" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
So the people comprising that 80% were nutjobs? Were you among them, John?
Moshe Goldfarb.
>
>> it's political of course- how would liberals make an issue out of it
>> without knocking their own candidate's mom (something you probably
>> don't want to do if you're a political strategist), given obama's own
>> mom was unwed when she got knocked up w/ obama?
>
>
> LOL! And let's not forget about the 'Certified Left Wing Nutjon's' that are
> whining because they don't feel Palin will have time for the job... you
> know,
> being that she has 5 kids an' all (but it's OK for men with kids?). Gee,
> something in their previous stances about equality for women seems to have
> fallen off a bit. Here's a telling lie from a male hypocrite on the topic:
>
> "You, not I, are the one who was embarrassed about doing "women's work".
>
> Notably, I didn't used the term "women's work" until this hypocrite used
> it...
> nor did I ever say anything about being "embarrassed" about doing any kind
> of
> work to anyone at any time. You might have an idea who this person is;)
Keeping who said what out of this because I don't really care, but looking
at the subject line..........
It's becoming apparent how low the left wingers will stoop.
They want a women in a high office position.
But.....Sarah has kids.
She is anti-abortion. IOW she is not a baby killer.
She has a husband (ever take a good look at the feminist movement leaders).
She has family problems, like all of us.
She had the courage to give birth to a challenged baby rather than kill it.
...and so forth...
If this episode in American media vs politics doesn't wake up the average
American to the fact that the press is highly left wing and highly biased
then nothing will.
Listen to MSNBC for example...
They might as well change their name to "Obama Central".
And Foxnews is no winner either although I will give O'Reilly credit for
bringing up issues such as her being investigated.
I can't stomach Hannity though.
He is a Rush wannabee with no brains.
I don't particularly like McCain because I see him as dead wood who has
been in politics far too long and who has lost touch with reality however I
feel that his pick of Sarah Palin was brilliant.
I like her!
--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
Steve Carroll
news:tsc73tjfxn2x.105gd841etay5$.d...@40tude.net
Your self-admitted druggie friend Snit has said he does not like Palin. Are
you two now going to fight about or ignore the fact you disagree? I bet
Snit never takes you to task while he proves in his discussion with ed that
he cannot understand a thing other than his own bias against Republicans.
Moshe Goldfarb.
I said:
" Keeping who said what out of this because I don't really care, but
looking at the subject line.........."
I follow very little of his disagreements and I never take sides unless it
is my opinion and you know how that one goes....
IOW I don't care what he says, I am addressing the subject line.
John
"Steve Carroll" <troll...@TK.com> wrote in message
Steve = Nutjob
Steve Carroll
You responded to a forger. Snit has been forging my name to try to get my
attention and because he is too stoned to know who he is.
Steve Carroll
So you do not care that you responded to Snit who was forging me?
Moshe Goldfarb.
Ok.
Whatever.
My post stands alone without regard to who I am replying to.
Steve Carroll
But if you respond to Snit as if he is me then you make me look bad. Look
at the headers and figure out who the hell you are talking to. I do not use
anonymous usenet providers as Snit does when he forges me.
Moshe Goldfarb.
Look, I don't care who is who.
I comment on topics, I generally don't care who writes the subject matter.
Exceptions are Schestowitz who is a paid SPAMMER...
Steve Carroll
Snit is the biggest liar in Usenet history. He sexually harasses women and
is a rapist. He accuses me of cheating on my wife when I talk about just
visiting them. He trolled anxiety newsgroups under the name Brock
McNuggets. It is to the point where you are either with those of us who are
reasonable or you are against us and there is no middle ground. Take a
stand and side against Snit and show you are not as much of an asshole as he
is.
Snit
JrSdnc7Dut0y4l3V...@giganews.com on 9/4/08 5:38 PM:
>>> Here's a better question:
>>>
>>> Why is Snit talking about *other* people being hypocrites?
>>
>> Snit, please stop forging my posting ID just because I point out what a
>> lying,
>> disingenuous, sh*t sack of a hypocrite you are.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> --
>> "Apple is pushing how green this is - but it [Macbook Air] is
>> clearly disposable... when the battery dies you can pretty much
>> just throw it away". - Snit
>>
>
>
> Steve = Nutjob
And, sadly, he is getting worse. The longer I go without directly
responding to him the crazier he will get. 100% predictable. Soon he will
blame me for the weather.
--
I think the Apple guys have a very good point when they say we should let
designers lead the definition of the user experience.
- Mark Shuttleworth (founded Canonical Ltd. / Ubuntu Linux)
Steve Carroll
"Moshe Goldfarb." <brick_...@gmail.com> wrote:
You're following it right now... you are responding to Snit forging my posting
ID... again... so that he can play the victim... again.
Steve Carroll
"Steve Carroll" <troll...@TK.com> wrote:
Snit, please stop forging my posting ID... again... so that you can play the
victim... again. I keep telling you... people aren't as stupid as you need them
to be.
Steve Carroll
"Steve Carroll" <troll...@TK.com> wrote:
Snit, please stop forging my posting ID... again... so that you can play the
victim... again.
Thanks.
Steve Carroll
Steve Carroll
Steve Carroll
Steve Carroll
Steve Carroll
Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> "John" <nos...@nospam.com> stated in post
> JrSdnc7Dut0y4l3V...@giganews.com on 9/4/08 5:38 PM:
>
> >>> Here's a better question:
> >>>
> >>> Why is Snit talking about *other* people being hypocrites?
> >>
> >> Snit, please stop forging my posting ID just because I point out what a
> >> lying,
> >> disingenuous, sh*t sack of a hypocrite you are.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> --
> >> "Apple is pushing how green this is - but it [Macbook Air] is
> >> clearly disposable... when the battery dies you can pretty much
> >> just throw it away". - Snit
> >>
> >
> >
> > Steve = Nutjob
>
> And, sadly, he is getting worse.
Sorry, Snit... no one believes your forgeries of me were "actually" posted by
me. I keep telling you... people just aren't as stupid as you need them to be.
Steve Carroll
Psyc Geek (TAB)
> "John" <nos...@nospam.com> stated in post
>
>
>
> >>> Here's a better question:
>
> >>> Why is Snit talking about *other* people being hypocrites?
>
> >> Snit, please stop forging my posting ID just because I point out what a
> >> lying,
> >> disingenuous, sh*t sack of a hypocrite you are.
>
> >> Thanks.
>
> >> --
> >> "Apple is pushing how green this is - but it [Macbook Air] is
> >> clearly disposable... when the battery dies you can pretty much
> >> just throw it away". - Snit
>
> > Steve = Nutjob
>
> And, sadly, he is getting worse. The longer I go without directly
> responding to him the crazier he will get. 100% predictable. Soon he will
> blame me for the weather.
You don't make the weather?
I thought you did cloud seeding to make rain and snow.
I thought the plane you used to fly to seed the clouds,
was run by linux.
Wait, if your plane was run by linux, it would never
get off the ground cause the flight crew would need
to learn to terminal, to solve the in-flight bugs.
My bad.
Moshe Goldfarb.
> You're following it right now... you are responding to Snit forging my posting
> ID... again... so that he can play the victim... again.
One needs a score card around here to keep track of who's who in the zoo.
Steve Carroll
"Moshe Goldfarb." <brick_...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 22:17:35 -0600, Steve Carroll wrote:
>
>
> > You're following it right now... you are responding to Snit forging my
> > posting
> > ID... again... so that he can play the victim... again.
>
> One needs a score card around here to keep track of who's who in the zoo.
Headers are easy enough to read. If there are forgeries cropping up that use my
name they were most likely created by Michael Glasser (aka Snit), a ng troll who
has forged my name (and others) in the past... and has even admitted to having
done so (after having been busted at it, of course).