>On Oct 23, 1:54�pm, John Blutarsky <bl...@faber.com> wrote:
>> DC <darthchaosofr...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:d6ed3649-d153-4f3c-8726-
>> f7171d9ab...@j19g2000vbp.googlegroups.com:
>>
>> > Currently running Windows Tiny7 Rev 01. Downloaded and installed a
>> > bunch of extra themes. Currently using the France theme...the Mont
>> > Saint-Michel wallpaper is currently on right now...the wallpapers
>> > change every 30 minutes. My WinTV PVR-250 card works perfectly on here
>> > as well as the WinTV2000 TV viewing application. Ran the registry fix
>> > for the Sidebar/Gadgets which work great as well and installed some
>> > extra gadgets.
>>
>> > I dare say Windows 7 is the best OS I have ever used...and I'm a
>> > hardcore Linux user. I installed Xubuntu 9.10 last week and was
>> > severely let down at how fucking slow it was. As of right now, my
>> > favorite OSes are Windows 7 and XXCE (self-customized Xubuntu Hardy).
>>
>> I pre-ordered Win7 back in July when they offered it for $50. �Just spent
>> the last two hours on the phone with Habib trying to understand why my
>> order still has not been processed. �The best I could get is, "You're a
>> valued customer and it will ship as soon as possible."
>>
>> It better be worth the wait.
>
>I ALWAYS wait 18 months after the release of the OS before I consider
>buying it. Too much history with complaints over Win-bugs right
>immediately after the OS; esp. after the debacle with Vista.
Vista is such trash though I'm willing to either buy this upgrade or just
go back down to windows xp...fuck this freezing up a relatively new
computer shit...
Macs are okay but too much software is written towards the Windows
platform; Linux's "Ubuntu" frontend is just merely adaquate unless you're
willing to put time in learning the system...yes it does work well as a Windows
like atmosphere, but you still needed to learn DOS to deal with Windows's more
arcane issues for a long time, and Ubuntu is proving no different so far.
--
Rob Cypher
http://robcypher.livejournal.com
http://www.myspace.com/robcyphercollective
http://www.facebook.com/robcypher
http://www.youtube.com/robcypher
http://www.twitter.com/robcypher
Music Reviews:
http://apps.facebook.com/visualcdrack/people/1713595594
Book Reviews:
http://apps.facebook.com/facebookshelf/people/1713595594
Movie Reviews:
http://apps.facebook.com/dvdshelf/people/1713595594
TV Reviews:
http://apps.facebook.com/livingsocial-tv/people/1713595594
Video Game Reviews:
http://apps.facebook.com/videogamerack/people/1713595594
That's why I waited that long. I upgraded from Win XP with not so
much as a couple of hiccups last year. Upgrading to 64-bit was...not
smooth but nothing I couldn't fix....and it runs great.
regards,
sk3tch
The key word here is "troll", and it answers your question.
Miles
Thank you for reading my little posting.
I run into silly people everyday, as I free the enslaved M$ users, to
run Linux Mint 7.
The Micro$oft dweebs are brainwashed by the proprietary vendors, that,
though they are susceptible to serious problems because the source code
is closed and restricted to only the anointed ones who are willing to
sign their life away, that even as the monster eats their homework, they
suffer the Stockholm Syndrome!
Then, there are the million Micro$oft virus, to bedevil them.
But, the real deal is this:
1. All Microsoft products are consecutive processing systems. They will
forever be slow due to the baby step method of processing whatever has
loaded from the Registry!
All the BSD (Mac OS X), Linux, Solaris, Irix, and other POSIX compliant
OSes are concurrent, parallel processing systems that are totally IMMUNE
to all the million Micro$oft virus/malbots/exploits!
2. Micro$oft abuses the filesystem, and the hard drive, in the way it's
loaded from the spindle outward. Very in-efficient for reading,
writing, and a contributer to excessive wear, and early failure!
The POSIX compliant OSes write to either side of the center of the drive
platter, cutting access time dramatically.
3. In the consecutive processing (baby steps) Micro$oft plan, every
application / window is halted except the one actually in use.
In the POSIX compliant OSes, all applications simply process
continuously no matter the one in use at the moment!
These are only 3 of the 1001 valid reasons demonstrated daily
that you need to be assimilated, for the good of the human revolution
towards true freedom of ownership of your data.
Intelligent lifeforms question why Mac and Windows users insist on
paying for their Operating Systems, when hundreds of better OSes are FREE!
--snippety-snip--
> Intelligent lifeforms question why Mac and Windows users insist on
> paying for their Operating Systems, when hundreds of better OSes are FREE!
Hundreds??
OK, I'll bite: name your top ten.
Isaac
And while you're at it, please name the larget known corporate user of the
particluar OS being listed, where said coportate user relies on no other OS
in the day to day running of their business..
I would be interested in reading more about this, I do know that I
bought my wife an IMAC and it is a kick ass machine. IMACS are Unix
based. The reason Unix doesn't crash is the hard kernal operating
system that uses parallel processing with Mutex and Semaphores. I took
a unix internal class a long time ago but I had a hard time
understanding the internals because I wasn't interested in the
subject. My wife's machine never crashes. Never. The next machine I
buy in going to be an Apple. In fact Christmas is around the
corner .......
> I would be interested in reading more about this, I do know that I
> bought my wife an IMAC and it is a kick ass machine. IMACS are Unix
> based. The reason Unix doesn't crash is the hard kernal operating
> system that uses parallel processing with Mutex and Semaphores. I took
> a unix internal class a long time ago but I had a hard time
> understanding the internals because I wasn't interested in the
> subject. My wife's machine never crashes. Never. The next machine I
> buy in going to be an Apple. In fact Christmas is around the
> corner .......
They are not totally immune to freezes, don't forget to back up
regularly to a separate HD if possible.
--
dorayme
yes I have my wife's system on autobackup. Pretty sweet. I will put it
this way I bought my wife the imac and it hasn't froze up since I got
it six months ago. She loves it.
Does your wife know about your habit of coming on adh Eddy? Or do you
keep it all a dark secret?
Jeff_D
But Microsoft is still a piece of shit....<g>
What planet are you living on. The last place I worked that had only a
single OS was a bank back in 1969. Within perhaps 5 years we probably
had 5 or 6 different OS's on various machines.
Jerry
> The same ones who are doing it now, see as they are writing them
> for v.7 they are also doing it for 'nix-based games as well. Besides
> computers are tools not toys, monetary gains aside games are not
> important in real world applications, sorry.
1. that's just bullshit
2. you're a snotty little dork
[snipped that stupid wrestling ng -- what the fuck?]
--
Suddenly he realized that he was alone
with a giant halfwit on a dark deserted street.
-- Chester Himes
Anyway....
What i'm wanting to find out is whether the release version [7100] is
vastly different from the final Beta realease [7000] that i've been
running the past few months?
I haven't noticed any glitches woth mentioning, ... I started off a
bit wary, cos most things my little Bro' sends me on an HDDand says
'just use it' tend to be screwed in some way!!...
So i have had it on a double boot since July, but i very swiftly found
mysdelf booting in Win 7 Beta every day, .. for a start it halves the
KB weight of Firefox! ... which is great cos i was >this< close to
moving over to Chrome, which aint a bad browser, it's just a lot of
lightweight open source stuff that needs some serious feedback before
V.2 is released, ..then maybe i'll go there...
Also what i've liked abouyt win 7 (oyther than it's Leopard OSX feel!,
which helps me move between Photoshhop at work and PS at home a lot
more easily) is that the 'console' as they call it these days, ..or
the 086 dos environment is far easier to use to your advantage without
having to con the OS (Vista) before gaining access to stuff like
direct telnet operations etc....
So Bottom line..... Do i need the Full Final Realease or if i'm happy
with my final Beta, can i relax and know i'm not missing out hugely...
(btw GFX are no matter to me, it's RAM and Rendering speeds im
interested in as a modeller rather than a gamer , ...oh i DO game!! ,
but no priority on the benchmark)
Cheers.
Tao.........
> Macs are okay but too much software is written towards the Windows
> platform; Linux's "Ubuntu" frontend is just merely adaquate unless you're
> willing to put time in learning the system...yes it does work well as a Windows
> like atmosphere, but you still needed to learn DOS to deal with Windows's more
> arcane issues for a long time, and Ubuntu is proving no different so far.
> --
> Rob Cypherhttp://robcypher.livejournal.comhttp://www.myspace.com/robcyphercollectivehttp://www.facebook.com/robcypherhttp://www.youtube.com/robcypherhttp://www.twitter.com/robcypher
--
Wes Groleau
It's the Law!
http://Ideas.Lang-Learn.us/WWW?itemid=93
>rec.sport.pro-wrestling,alt.drugs.hard,alt.linux,comp.sys.mac.apps,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.win32
Attempts at redirection corrected. Your resistance is futile. Prepare to be
assimilated.
--
Rob Cypher
http://robcypher.livejournal.com
http://www.myspace.com/robcyphercollective
http://www.facebook.com/robcypher
http://www.youtube.com/robcypher
> Please add me to your kill files. Thanks!
Done. Bye now.
--
Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me.
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM
filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google
Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts.
JR
>In article <1huse5ttvbmd35k80...@4ax.com>,
> Rob Cypher <bal...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>>Are you a butteating moron?
>
>Yes sir. Feel free to fucks my mums, yo
Right there, chav!
I suspect there's a lot about Eds his wife doesn't know .....
...hmmmmmmmm....
1. Ubuntu
2. Slax
3. Knoppix
4. Phlak
5. Slackware
6. Suse
7. FreeBSD
8. Darkstar
9. Lindows
10. Fedora
���j{� ��� ���,
--
--------------------------------- --- -- -
Posted with NewsLeecher v4.0 Beta 11
Web @ http://www.newsleecher.com/?usenet
------------------- ----- ---- -- -
--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ne...@netfront.net ---
> well I don't know about all of you out there but mine are:
>
> 1. Ubuntu
> 2. Slax
> 3. Knoppix
> 4. Phlak
> 5. Slackware
> 6. Suse
> 7. FreeBSD
> 8. Darkstar
> 9. Lindows
> 10. Fedora
> ���j{� ��� ���,
Like it or not, if it was not for Windows, it is possible we would not
have as many choices. There was a time when companies did not build
clone computers that could run multiple softwares from different
sources. Just some food for thought.
bosco
There was quite a lot of different Unixes, today we have less, some single
platform others multiplatform.
There are those who say that microsoft has stopped the evolution of software,
for those who wants to read what Keith Curtis thinks, take a look at this pdf
book (or buy the printed version):
http://www.lulu.com/product/download/after-the-software-wars/6276446
--
//Aho