PATRICK HUMPHREY - THE PROOF HE IS A STALKER (In Other Victims' Words)
Doc Tavish
(Archived locally as: PLHstalker_FatherJite)
From: Fathe...@worldnet.att.net (Father Jite)
Subject: PATRICK HUMPHREY - THE PROOF HE IS A STALKER
Message-ID: <6973a7$p...@bgtnsc01.worldnet.att.net>
References: <3334A7...@cei.net> <kjdfd9 <5ie2bu$j81$1...@nntp1.ba.best.com>
<5iegac$1k...@sol.caps.maine.edu> <kjdb431...@news.tamu.edu>
<szkwwqc...@pentagon.io.com> <335221bd...@netnews2.worldnet.att.net>
<33518cc5...@netnews2.worldnet.att.net>
Organization: Conservatively Incorrect
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.libertarian,
talk.abortion,houston.general
Understand the purpose here. For 14 years this abject loser has been
following me around to every BBS and network I have been on doing
little else than squealing what my name may be and where I may live.
It is a probably the most classic case on the net of invasion of
privacy and cyberspace stalking, which has lead him to physically
stalk me at home.
Mr. Humphrey refuses to stop under any condition. Recently I
unilaterally stated that I would remove his name from my website, and
make no mention of him anywhere at all to see if he would reciprocate,
to stop this battle and prove to everyone he is not the stalker I
claim him to be. The day after I publicly posted that message, he was
replying to my issue oriented messages including what he presumes my
name and where I live, and has proceeded to do so over the entire two
week period. Probably the defining factor of a stalker is their
inability to stop it.
Though Rice University has sent me a letter of apology for the actions
of Mr. Humphrey and Rice Legal Department no longer allows him to use
his employee account as a base for his stalking, he now uses a paid
service to carry on his pyschotic obsession with me. As most anything
goes with ISPs, it leaves me few options to deal with this little
netscab. As literally thousands of liberals have been intimitated out
of the political newsgroups because of this onerous game, I am going
to fight it.
Note that these few quotes below are only about .01% of the totality
of the crap this Squealing little stalker has been so proudly posting
for what he so often brags has been fourteen years.
I know this is irritating to many of you, but it is the only way I
have of fighting back. This issue of privacy is the central issue of
the net, and as such a fair topic of debate anywhere.
All Humphrey has to do is stop the squealing and I will never address,
mention or think about him ever again.
A few direct quotes from Squealer and Loser Patrick Humphrey
confirming his threats and stalking:
--Patrick L. 'a grandfather to be -- and any congratulations from a
sick little asshole named Peter Nyikos will be returned with a grenade
with a pulled pin' Humphrey
--PLH, and people wonder why I occasionally pedal by Dahlman's house
to give him the one-finger salute...
Oh...and you need to trim the mustache...
--Patrick L. ‘El Lago, April 9, about 14:35 remember me?’ Humphrey"
You need to clean up the toys in your driveway...
--Patrick L. "Dave can't stand that I know where he lives" Humphrey
I guess it's just an amazing coincidence, then, that the pictures on
your home page just happen to bear an uncanny resemblance to the
fellow out in front of your listed address when I came down the street
one afternoon three weeks ago...
--Patrick L. 'coming by again in two weeks' Humphrey
"I don't think so, because you don't resemble me at all...and that
much I know from personal experience, after two weekends ago.
--Patrick L. ‘it was a worthwhile 88 miles spent’ Humphrey
Be sure to understand this is about the sixth occasion this squealer
has been to what he presumes to be my home... Rack Jite
---Try *fourth* --Patrick L. 'bout time to put on the Spandex and
pedal over that way :-)’Humphrey"
The tire swing in front of your house...
--Patrick L. "still pedaling" Humphrey
Thanks to a gutless bastard in the Houston suburbs named David F.
Dahlman, you mean. And I never claimed there was a tire swing in your
front yard, liar. Your _neighbor's_ yard, yes -- and that was
something like three years ago, too. Are you going to state that your
yard is in the same state of being cluttered now as it was three years
ago?--Patrick L. "14 days, tick tick tick, heh heh" Humphrey
I've pedaled by his house three or four times, and one time, just by
dumb luck, he and his family happened to be outside.
--Patrick L. Humphrey
Actually, I live on the other side of the Houston area from Dave...and
the shortest possible pedal between where I live and where he lives
would be something like 40 miles. That's one reason I've done it only
a couple of times. (Yes, Dave, the other times I've been by, I drove.
:) Hey, it's good exercise, and it gives Dave the chance to jerk his
knee.
--Patrick L. better hide, 'Shawn' -- less than two months to my visit
to Austin :-) Humphrey
Hey, S. Shawn...now that you're in the DFW area, you'll have to hide
under your bed again, because we're going to be up there next weekend
--PLH, six days and rolling
---Sad, but true, but at least it'll be a bit easier than I thought to
encounter "Shawn" when I'm in Austin next month--Patrick L. Humphrey
---No, it's more like you're in your own little world out there in the
Houston suburbs. --Patrick L. "17 days and pedaling" Humphrey
--Patrick L. "I think I just guaranteed myself a smooth pedal down to
the Island" Humphrey
It figures a foreigner like you couldn't.... Personally, I'd just as
soon you go back to whatever underprivileged neighborhood in the U.S.
you got booted out of -- the farther away from Texas, the better.
That is _my_ opinion.
--Patrick L. and it can be yours, but it'll cost ya big time Humphrey
You lie like a rug, "Shawn". Pointing out that Dahlman lives across
town from me -- so what? ...I have NEVER posted the name on his
mailbox (another interesting claim, since you think his mailbox is on
the street, and it isn't -- no one's is, in that area, and in a LOT of
areas all over Houston), and I pointed out the appearance of his yard
*two years ago*, Get back to me when you can write something
original, "Shawn". Meanwhile, go cower under your bed, since I'm only
37 days away from being in the same city as you.
--Patrick L. "just thought I'd say that" Humphrey
Besides, I'm going to be pedaling by, less than five miles away, on
the morning of March 30
--Patrick L. "pull!" Humphrey
--PLH, I'll deal with Shawn on the 30th, heh heh heh
Better run and hide, S. Shawn. I may be in -your- neighborhood.
--PLH, I've got a Bat Attitude.
It's funny, though, that at one time, Jimbo had FOUR phone lines
listed under his name at one address -- and then, all of a
sudden, he's down to ONE line at a different address that is actually
an apartment complex. Yeah, I know a LOT of people who move an entire
family from a house to a cracker-box apartment...--PLH
---
Picture and more info on this abject loser at:
http://www.dragon <dead link>
-
"Son, never lose sight of the connection between supermarket tabloids,
professional wrestling, evangelism and supply side economics." Father Jite
Conservatively Incorrect ----> http://www.dragonf <dead link>
<END>
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/talk.abortion/msg/5807622c7c529dd6
(Archived locally as:n PLHstalksSZKH)
From: pat...@xanadu.io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey)
Subject: Re: PATRICK L. HUMPHREY - SQUEALER, STALKER, LOSER
Message-ID: <szkhgkg...@xanadu.io.com>
references: <32def493...@netnews2.worldnet.att.net>
In article <32def493.54388...@netnews2.worldnet.att.net>
rackj...@worldnet.att.net (Rack Jite) writes:
>I have in my presently nicotine stained fingers a letter of apology from
>The Office of the General Counsel at Rice University concerning an
>employee of theirs, Patrick L. Humphrey, for not acting with "integrity"
>and lacking a "respect for the rights of others."
Really? You've been clutching it for EIGHTEEN MONTHS? I'm almost impressed.
Just out of curiosity, though: whose signature is on it? After all, you
-have- been known to make things up and try and pass them off as fact.
>They monitored him for approximately 2 months and found he had been
>using the University computer system on company time to reveal personal
>information, cyber-stalk, and repeatedly brag about physically stalking
>another user, his home and family. The day I received the letter, July
>28th, 1995, Humphrey moved to a pay service where he has been doing his
>stalking and squealing from ever since.
So what's YOUR problem, Dave? You were on your little crusade to force those
who dared to disagree with you from company or employer accounts to pay for
their access -- that's what you said, and would Dave Dahlman LIE?
[...]
You're a schmuck, Dave. You make it fun to come by where you live, because
all I have to do is mention it later and you react in a manner that would make
Pavlov's dog look like the soul of randomness by comparison. You might as
well get used to your paranoia, because I'm going to keep mocking you.
--Patrick L. "business is good, and here comes April 19" Humphrey
<end>
The same person being stalked by Patrick L. Humphrey asked these questions a
while back and I include the questions asked to what Patrick Humphrey is still
doing to me!
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/talk.politics.libertarian/msg/fb6505eb9c45fbdd
From: rack...@worldnet.att.net (Rack Jite)
Subject: ARE YOU A STALKER?
Message-ID: <5vfbed$d...@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net>
Whether one be from Houston or one's views on abortion portend little,
but being a Looneytarian sure does! :)
What is a stalker? Are you a stalker?
Here are a few questions that will help answer that:
Have you singled out one person on the net who you reply to with
an attack message no matter what the subject or issue?
Have you followed a user from BBS, to nets to the internet for
more than a decade pushing whatever information you can find on
that person?
Have you been called a stalker by more than half a dozen people?
Do you know the age, birth date and address of users you do
not like?
Have you gone to websites to gather information on a user and
then post it publicly?
Have you contacted another user's local police..
Have you physically been to a user's home you do not like?
Have you been to a user's home you do not like four or more times?
Have you publicly posted information describing a users home,
yard and physical appearance?
Have you befriended the scum of the net to help you on your jihad
against another user?
Has your employer disciplined you for stalking someone on the net?
Have you had more than one person contact police agencies
about your stalking?
Have you found that the only people on the net to befriend
you are either hopelessly stupid or abject losers?
Have you left in excess of 10,000 messages spreading what you
suspect may by a user's name?
Patrick L. Humphrey must answer YES! to each of those questions.
Though when confronted with the truth like this, he mostly regresses
into playing semantic word games and lies to deny it all.
It's all very strange, sometimes he is so proud of his squealing and
stalking he brags of it [just the other day so gleefully bragging
about contacting my local police and saying my children constantly
dial 911). But over the years his most prevalent response has been his
juvenile -- NAnanaNAna!/you CANT stop ME!/Bwahahaha! -- rants.
He is not very bright. Which perhaps is the bottom line.
<end>
=======================================================================
Another person commenting on Patrick's stalkings:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/dc0a0f877ae1d691
(Archived locally as: PLHstalker_ZORRO)
From: "ZORRO" <ku...@dotplanet.com>
Newsgroups: alt.current-events.net-abuse,alt.religion.scientology,
alt.society.liberalism,alt.usenet.kooks,houston.eats,news.admin.censorship,soc.singles
Subject: PATRICK L. HUMPHREY
Message-ID: <a4QB4.850$4a.3...@pm01news.wcom.com>
Patrick, you never contribute to the debate. All you present is braggadocio,
insults, and accusations.
Please tell us why you feel so threatened when others exercise their right
to free speech?
During the Revolution, in which the United States won it's independence from
Brittain, Anonymity was crucial to promoting the exchange of ideas. The
principles of government, on which this nation was founded, were presented
in a brilliant discourse entitled "The Federalist Papers". Newspapers of the
time printed editorials without disclosing the identity of the author. This
was necessary to protect them from police action by the Tories.
Anonymous writings, publication with pen names, is still legal in the United
States. It is crucial to preserving our right to free speech which is the
first protection of all our other rights and freedoms.
We allow you the freedom to disagree. You are free to write why you believe
free speech should be abolish. However; You are not free to use the tactics
you have been using.
There is a tort called "Public disclosure of private facts". You and Logan
Villa have utilized this in your attempts to stifle my exercise of my free
speech. You persist in disclosing my name and my employment without my
permission to do so. My posts have always associated me with INFORMED
CITIZENS. Which is a distinct and seperate entity from my employer. I have
never disclosed my employment in any of my posts.
Please tell us why you feel so threatened when others exercise their right
to free speech. It is obvious this is the reason you harrass and
continually post nothing but insulting names in response to anyone posts
outside your small little circle of approved friends. Friends who used the
same tactics as you.
It is sad but true that you and logan villa have been very effective in
utilizing these tactics to kill participation in this newsgroup by all but a
few. It is obvious to me this is your objective.
Please tell us, what is something you picked up in your Russian Studies
classes? Free Speech was never allowed there until recently. We have seen
the results of this. A nation with by far the greatest wealth in the most
abundant resources of any nation. A nation that has many brilliant minds as
evident by the literature of their writers, writings the people there could
not read. A nation where all people have had access to an excellent
education but at the same time have been taught to not think for themselves.
Is a nation in ruins with people starving because of a long history of
stiffling free speech.
Why do you want to bring this to the United States of America? Is is because
you hate America?
You have proudly disclosed in your posts that you work for Rice University.
Is this what Rice is promoting in their classes? Is this their policy on
free speech? We see from the return address on your posts and the times of
the posts that you monitor these newsgroups and post to them during your
free time. Yet you call the employers of others to ask them if they are
aware their employees are posting during their work hours. Tell us; Are
these postings on behalf of the University?
A review of the speakers Rice has brought to town, noticing Rice University
was the only place in town where people could see "Waco - The Rules of
Engagement", indicates this is not the type of attitude and behavior this
University would want to be associated with.
So tell us; Why do you feel so threatened when others exercise their right
to free speech?
Patrick L Humphrey <patr...@is.rice.edu> wrote in message
news:layog8b...@is.rice.edu...
> "ZORRO" <i...@informed.org> writes:
>
> Looks like Ed's meds are wearing off again...
> >I have been to Austin many times to lobby against some proposed changes
> >made to this code.I have done so on my own time and at my own expense.
>
> Riiiiight, Ed. Like MCI will let you do that. I don't think too many
> corporations would allow their employees all that free time to go
> politicking...and if you've been doing it outside of work time, then you
> obviously don't have much else of a life.
>
> --PLH, how many of Ed's candidates won in the primaries? None. Connect
>the dots.
<end>
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/ac3892053e0a95cd
Subject: Patrick L. Humphrey-- A Dangerous Stalker? - How To Identify Stalkers
Info UPDATED LINKS S_0202
Message-ID: <4n4u10thkq0jntg82...@4ax.com>
Date: 3 Feb 2004 03:56:50 GMT
How Patrick L.Humphrey Avoids the Facts Contained in the Archive Above:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/18e38072659756be
Message-ID: <2b1020hnohd6v183t...@4ax.com>
References: <4n4u10thkq0jntg82...@4ax.com>
<szkhdy8...@fnord.io.com>
Date: 3 Feb 2004 20:45:36 GMT
Patrick Lee Humphrey: Facts about His TERMINATION From Rice University:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/58bf60a708d42cc3
Message-ID: <jjrv10h69n06h1h60...@4ax.com>
Date: 3 Feb 2004 20:29:17 GMT
_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
Android Cat
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/houston.general/msg/187d85cd9d746b01
> (Archived locally as: PLHstalker_FatherJite)
> From: Fathe...@worldnet.att.net (Father Jite)
> Subject: PATRICK HUMPHREY - THE PROOF HE IS A STALKER
> Message-ID: <6973a7$p...@bgtnsc01.worldnet.att.net>
> References: <3334A7...@cei.net> <kjdfd9
> <5ie2bu$j81$1...@nntp1.ba.best.com> <5iegac$1k...@sol.caps.maine.edu>
> <kjdb431...@news.tamu.edu> <szkwwqc...@pentagon.io.com>
> <335221bd...@netnews2.worldnet.att.net>
> <33518cc5...@netnews2.worldnet.att.net>
> Organization: Conservatively Incorrect
> Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.libertarian,
> talk.abortion,houston.general
>
> Understand the purpose here. For 14 years this abject loser has been
> following me around to every BBS and network I have been on doing
> little else than squealing what my name may be and where I may live.
> It is a probably the most classic case on the net of invasion of
> privacy and cyberspace stalking, which has lead him to physically
> stalk me at home.
Fine, but could you leave alt.religion.scientology out of it?
--
Ron of that ilk.
Doc Tavish
Instigator <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>Bradbury's newsgroup stalking removed.
>
>R. Scott Bradbury <rhc-tavish@tavish-central> writes:
>
>:http://groups-beta.google.com/group/houston.general/msg/187d85cd9d746b01
>:(Archived locally as: PLHstalker_FatherJite)
>:From: Fathe...@worldnet.att.net (Father Jite)
>:Subject: PATRICK HUMPHREY - THE PROOF HE IS A STALKER
>:Message-ID: <6973a7$p...@bgtnsc01.worldnet.att.net>
>:References: <3334A7...@cei.net> <kjdfd9 <5ie2bu$j81$1...@nntp1.ba.best.com>
>:<5iegac$1k...@sol.caps.maine.edu> <kjdb431...@news.tamu.edu>
>:<szkwwqc...@pentagon.io.com> <335221bd...@netnews2.worldnet.att.net>
>:<33518cc5...@netnews2.worldnet.att.net>
>:Organization: Conservatively Incorrect
>:Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.libertarian,
>:talk.abortion,houston.general
>:
>:Understand the purpose here. For 14 years this abject loser has been
>
>Free clue, Bozo of Xxxxxxx:
Seeing how you like posting where people live:
"Where we're at, and all that
Dale and I can be reached at the following snail mail location: Patrick & Dale
Ann Humphrey 7500 Bellerive #1807 Houston, Texas 77036-3040.
http://www.io.com/~patrick/address.html "
The above listed in a GOOGLE Web Search:
http://www.google.com/search?as_q=&num=10&hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&c2coff=1&btnG=Google+Search&as_epq=7500+Bellerive+%231807&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=&safe=off
(Link active June 25, 2005. Archived locally as: PLHaddressGOOGLE)
>Dave Dahlman's still around, and has gotten a life.
Which translated means: You're no longer stalking him!
>Maybe you should ask him about his little fantasy that a local police
>officer in his town told him he should shoot at me, if I came down his street.
I doubt if he said that. He was probably told the same as what my police said
concerning you in their advice to me-- Get a concealed carry permit and become
proficient in "GUN CONTROL" meaning being able to hit your target.
>Feel free to infest the newsgroup he participates in. You'll get the same
>reception there as in all the other newsgroups you use for a toilet.
The other posts Patrick doesn't want to deal with:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/talk.abortion/msg/5807622c7c529dd6
(Archived locally as:n PLHstalksSZKH)
From: pat...@xanadu.io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey)
Subject: Re: PATRICK L. HUMPHREY - SQUEALER, STALKER, LOSER
Message-ID: <szkhgkg...@xanadu.io.com>
references: <32def493...@netnews2.worldnet.att.net>
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/talk.politics.libertarian/msg/fb6505eb9c45fbdd
From: rack...@worldnet.att.net (Rack Jite)
Subject: ARE YOU A STALKER?
Message-ID: <5vfbed$d...@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net>
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/dc0a0f877ae1d691
(Archived locally as: PLHstalker_ZORRO)
From: "ZORRO" <ku...@dotplanet.com>
Newsgroups: alt.current-events.net-abuse,alt.religion.scientology,
alt.society.liberalism,alt.usenet.kooks,houston.eats,news.admin.censorship,soc.singles
Subject: PATRICK L. HUMPHREY
Message-ID: <a4QB4.850$4a.3...@pm01news.wcom.com>
Many people have called you a stalker Patrick and they are correct and I will
keep exposing you as being one so everyone else may be on the look out!
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/ac3892053e0a95cd
Subject: Patrick L. Humphrey-- A Dangerous Stalker? - How To Identify Stalkers
Info UPDATED LINKS S_0202
Message-ID: <4n4u10thkq0jntg82...@4ax.com>
(EXCERPTED)
WHAT IS STALKING?
STALKING - pattern of words or conduct that is intended to cause and does cause
the targeted person to fear death, assault, bodily injury, or CSC upon the
person or member of the person's family.
HARASSMENT - pattern of intentional substantial and unreasonable intrusion
which causes the targeted person to suffer mental distress. A suspect must be
provided notice that contact is unwanted.
PSYCHOLOGICAL AND BEHAVIORAL PROFILE OF STALKERS
Simple Obsession Stalkers:
Simple obsession stalkers represent 70 to 80% of all stalking cases.
Characteristics include:
1 personality disorders.
2 emotional immaturity, jealousy and extreme insecurity.
3 inability to succeed in relationships by socially-accepted means.
4 dominating and intimidating victims in order to bolster own self-esteem.
5 biggest fear is losing the victim.
6 believing their lives have no worth without the victim.
7 turning to violence in order to control every aspect of the victim's life
STALKING BEHAVIOR PATTERNS AND CYCLES
1 Attempts at intimidation often begin in the form of an unjustified, jealous
and inappropriate intrusion into the victim's life.
2 Contacts become more numerous and intrusive over time, until such conduct
becomes a persistent pattern of harassment.
TYPES OF STALKING BEHAVIOR
1 visiting or following the victim
2 harassing telephone calls, which includes obscene calls and hang-ups
3 sending threatening mail, which is a federal felony
4 trespassing
5 vandalism
WHAT IS STALKING BEHAVIOR?
Stalking has been referred to as a "building block crime" because it usually
starts with small incidents that can get more and more serious. These incidents
can include such behaviors as:
1) following
2) watching
3) spying
4) tracking someone
==END==================================================================
Patrick Lee Humphrey: Facts about His TERMINATION From Rice University:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/58bf60a708d42cc3
Message-ID: <jjrv10h69n06h1h60...@4ax.com>
Texas State Law on Stalking and CyberStalking:
State of Texas Penal Code Sec. 42.072 - 1997. STALKING.
(a) A person commits an offense if the person, on more than one occasion and
pursuant to the same scheme or course of conduct that is directed specifically
at another person, knowingly engages in conduct, including following the other
person, that:
(1) the actor knows or reasonably believes the other person will regard as
threatening:
(A) bodily injury or death for the other person;
(B) bodily injury or death for a member of the other person's family or
household; or
(C) that an offense will be committed against the other person's property;
(2) causes the other person or a member of the other person's family or
household to be placed in fear of bodily injury or death or fear that an offense
will be committed against the other person's property; and
(3) would cause a to fear:
(A) bodily injury or death for himself or herself;
(B) bodily injury or death for a member of the person's family or household; or
(C) that an offense will be committed against the person's property.
(b) An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor, except that the
offense is a felony of the third degree if the actor has previously been
convicted under this section.
(c) In this section, "family," "household," and "member of a household" have the
meanings assigned by Chapter 71, Family Code.
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch 1, & 1, eff. Jan. 28, 1997. Amended by Acts
1999, 76th Leg., ch. 62, & 15.02(e), eff. Sept. 1, 1999.
SB 139, which went into effect on September 1, 2001, increases the penalties for
stalking crimes.
Pursuant to the new law, violations for stalking now carry felony penalties.
The statute also amends the definition of the crime of harassment to include
electronic communications.
2001 UPDATED: SECTION 1. Section 42.07, Penal Code, is amended to read as
follows: Sec. 42.07. HARASSMENT.
A person commits an offense if, with intent to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse,
torment, or embarrass another, he:
initiates communication by telephone, in writing, or by electronic
communication... to alarm the person receiving to fear bodily injury on the
person or to commit a felony against the person, or his property...
sends repeated electronic communications in a manner reasonably likely to
harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment...
>--
> Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
> chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
> LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
> NEXT GAME: Date/opponent/site TBA in August 2005
Jack Zwick
Doc Tavish
<jackzwick-55EFB...@newssvr11-ext.news.prodigy.com> Jack Zwick
<jack...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Reposting your rants daily doesn't make them more correct.
You're just in denial!! Are you one of the people Patrick attends the Gay Pride
Parades with?
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/1a20fad3639c0528
Subject: Houstonian Patrick L. Humphrey Defends His Homosexualist Ally and
Attends Gay Pride Parades (His Gay Cruising Fully Documented)
Message-ID: <mmqfev0mn3u3r8gtr...@4ax.com>
Date: 12 Jun 2003 03:16:05 GMT
Jack Zwick
Doc Tavish <rhc-tavish@tavish-central> wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 09:59:35 GMT,
> <jackzwick-55EFB...@newssvr11-ext.news.prodigy.com> Jack Zwick
> <jack...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >Reposting your rants daily doesn't make them more correct.
>
> You're just in denial!!
No, but you just described yourself perfectly.