Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
k00k of the month greegor's k00kfart Usenet posts being nuked extensively
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Greegor
Apr 12, 2012, 6:10:57 PM4/12/12
to
On Apr 12, 4:45 pm, Mark Morgan <m...@nomail.invalid> wrote:
> bit...@aukhistory.org (!dr. bit rot ) wrote innews:jm7fbs$nn4$1...@dont-email.me:
>
> > got some new fans
>
> Ones you havn't netKoped yet, shitpot? You're slipping and
> getting pissed on again.
That's Timmy M. Skirvin!
Have you seen his anal expulsive web pages?
I loved his Friends page where he lists
dozens of people, starting with his family
and pets and including some people who probably
just barely tolerate him because of his disability.
He even lists dead pets.
Can you spot the signs of Aspergers?
> bit...@aukhistory.org (!dr. bit rot ) wrote innews:jm7fbs$nn4$1...@dont-email.me:
>
> > got some new fans
>
> Ones you havn't netKoped yet, shitpot? You're slipping and
> getting pissed on again.
That's Timmy M. Skirvin!
Have you seen his anal expulsive web pages?
I loved his Friends page where he lists
dozens of people, starting with his family
and pets and including some people who probably
just barely tolerate him because of his disability.
He even lists dead pets.
Can you spot the signs of Aspergers?
Greegor
Apr 19, 2012, 9:40:16 AM4/19/12
to
KBW > What's really interesting is that Greg knew
KBW > what the debt was for. The court web site
KBW > doesn't mention what the debt was in regards
KBW > to, but Greg KNOWS it's heating oil.
The debt owed by the other Greg Hanson is
owed to a company that sells bulk oil.
It doesn't take a genius to figure out what the bill is for.
How else do you think somebody could end
up owing almost 3K to an oil company?
The very OLD garnishment against the guy
with the same first and last name as me
does not specify any middle name or DOB.
My court records before and after that all
have my middle name and DOB don't they, Kent?
The guy doesn't owe a "debt to society".
He owes the money to an oil company.
KBW > what the debt was for. The court web site
KBW > doesn't mention what the debt was in regards
KBW > to, but Greg KNOWS it's heating oil.
The debt owed by the other Greg Hanson is
owed to a company that sells bulk oil.
It doesn't take a genius to figure out what the bill is for.
How else do you think somebody could end
up owing almost 3K to an oil company?
The very OLD garnishment against the guy
with the same first and last name as me
does not specify any middle name or DOB.
My court records before and after that all
have my middle name and DOB don't they, Kent?
The guy doesn't owe a "debt to society".
He owes the money to an oil company.
Fred Hall
Apr 19, 2012, 9:57:21 AM4/19/12
to
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 06:40:16 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
<cb2ebdde-7019-4a97...@x17g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>:
>It doesn't take a genius to figure out
Why you were in the bathroom with a naked 7 year old girl?
--
"These clowns are all Jokers!" - Rasta Khan
"I'm more of a Usenet force than you'll ever imagine in your wildest dreams." - Nellie Hall
KotAGoR XXXXI
COOSN-075-07-81342
Brainwashed Follower of Art Deco #1
Old Gringo's Poopy Lits #1
Nellies invalid AUK Sociopath lits #10
@'s Lits of cyberterrorists and cyber bullies #1
eMutT lits o' hate #4
Lits Slut#10
Usenet Ruiner #3
Top Asshole On The Net #2
Most Hated Usenetizen of all time #2.
Sweetness Seal Of Approval #2
Hammer of Thor - August 2005
Pierre Salinger HL&S - January 2012
Pierre Salinger HL&S - February 2012
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle,Trainer Rasta Khan March 2006
<cb2ebdde-7019-4a97...@x17g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>:
>It doesn't take a genius to figure out
--
"These clowns are all Jokers!" - Rasta Khan
"I'm more of a Usenet force than you'll ever imagine in your wildest dreams." - Nellie Hall
KotAGoR XXXXI
COOSN-075-07-81342
Brainwashed Follower of Art Deco #1
Old Gringo's Poopy Lits #1
Nellies invalid AUK Sociopath lits #10
@'s Lits of cyberterrorists and cyber bullies #1
eMutT lits o' hate #4
Lits Slut#10
Usenet Ruiner #3
Top Asshole On The Net #2
Most Hated Usenetizen of all time #2.
Sweetness Seal Of Approval #2
Hammer of Thor - August 2005
Pierre Salinger HL&S - January 2012
Pierre Salinger HL&S - February 2012
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle,Trainer Rasta Khan March 2006
Checkmate
Apr 19, 2012, 1:22:02 PM4/19/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
Pay your bill, you free-loading chump.
--
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
Hammer of Thor, Feb. 2012
Copyright © 2012
all rights reserved
"its usually the lesser intelligent person , that comments
on the more intelligent person's , lack of intelligents"
-Dave Keating, AKA "Squiggles" the assworm, AKA %, explaining
intelligence
"we all think what we do has major significants"
-Squiggles explains why he spends so much time on Usenet... and why he
can't play Scrabble
Checkmate!
--
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
Hammer of Thor, Feb. 2012
Copyright © 2012
all rights reserved
"its usually the lesser intelligent person , that comments
on the more intelligent person's , lack of intelligents"
-Dave Keating, AKA "Squiggles" the assworm, AKA %, explaining
intelligence
"we all think what we do has major significants"
-Squiggles explains why he spends so much time on Usenet... and why he
can't play Scrabble
Checkmate
Apr 19, 2012, 1:22:32 PM4/19/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
Checkmate!
First, check out what Fred Hall said:
>
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 06:40:16 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
> <cb2ebdde-7019-4a97...@x17g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>:
>
> >It doesn't take a genius to figure out
>
> Why you were in the bathroom with a naked 7 year old girl?
Why, why, WHY?????
>
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 06:40:16 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
> <cb2ebdde-7019-4a97...@x17g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>:
>
> >It doesn't take a genius to figure out
>
> Why you were in the bathroom with a naked 7 year old girl?
Fred Hall
Apr 19, 2012, 1:24:46 PM4/19/12
to
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:22:32 -0700, Checkmate <Lunati...@The.Edge> wrote in
<MPG.29f9e9b3a...@news.alt.net>:
>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>Checkmate!
>
>First, check out what Fred Hall said:
>
>
>>
>> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 06:40:16 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
>> <cb2ebdde-7019-4a97...@x17g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>:
>>
>> >It doesn't take a genius to figure out
>>
>> Why you were in the bathroom with a naked 7 year old girl?
>
>Why, why, WHY?????
The whole world's watching.
<MPG.29f9e9b3a...@news.alt.net>:
>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>Checkmate!
>
>First, check out what Fred Hall said:
>
>
>>
>> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 06:40:16 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
>> <cb2ebdde-7019-4a97...@x17g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>:
>>
>> >It doesn't take a genius to figure out
>>
>> Why you were in the bathroom with a naked 7 year old girl?
>
>Why, why, WHY?????
Checkmate
Apr 19, 2012, 1:48:39 PM4/19/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
First, check out what Fred Hall said:
>
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:22:32 -0700, Checkmate <Lunati...@The.Edge> wrote in
> <MPG.29f9e9b3a...@news.alt.net>:
>
> >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> >Checkmate!
> >
> >First, check out what Fred Hall said:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 06:40:16 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
> >> <cb2ebdde-7019-4a97...@x17g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>:
> >>
> >> >It doesn't take a genius to figure out
> >>
> >> Why you were in the bathroom with a naked 7 year old girl?
> >
> >Why, why, WHY?????
>
> The whole world's watching.
The hills are alive...
Checkmate!
First, check out what Fred Hall said:
>
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:22:32 -0700, Checkmate <Lunati...@The.Edge> wrote in
> <MPG.29f9e9b3a...@news.alt.net>:
>
> >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> >Checkmate!
> >
> >First, check out what Fred Hall said:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 06:40:16 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
> >> <cb2ebdde-7019-4a97...@x17g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>:
> >>
> >> >It doesn't take a genius to figure out
> >>
> >> Why you were in the bathroom with a naked 7 year old girl?
> >
> >Why, why, WHY?????
>
> The whole world's watching.
with the sound of... crickets.
WHY, Greegor?
Fred Hall
Apr 19, 2012, 2:07:31 PM4/19/12
to
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:48:39 -0700, Checkmate <Lunati...@The.Edge> wrote in
<MPG.29f9efd3c...@news.alt.net>:
>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>Checkmate!
>
>First, check out what Fred Hall said:
>
>
>>
>> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:22:32 -0700, Checkmate <Lunati...@The.Edge> wrote in
>> <MPG.29f9e9b3a...@news.alt.net>:
>>
>> >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>> >Checkmate!
>> >
>> >First, check out what Fred Hall said:
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 06:40:16 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
>> >> <cb2ebdde-7019-4a97...@x17g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>:
>> >>
>> >> >It doesn't take a genius to figure out
>> >>
>> >> Why you were in the bathroom with a naked 7 year old girl?
>> >
>> >Why, why, WHY?????
>>
>> The whole world's watching.
>
>The hills are alive...
>with the sound of... crickets.
>
>WHY, Greegor?
WHY, Greegor?
<MPG.29f9efd3c...@news.alt.net>:
>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>Checkmate!
>
>First, check out what Fred Hall said:
>
>
>>
>> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:22:32 -0700, Checkmate <Lunati...@The.Edge> wrote in
>> <MPG.29f9e9b3a...@news.alt.net>:
>>
>> >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>> >Checkmate!
>> >
>> >First, check out what Fred Hall said:
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 06:40:16 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
>> >> <cb2ebdde-7019-4a97...@x17g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>:
>> >>
>> >> >It doesn't take a genius to figure out
>> >>
>> >> Why you were in the bathroom with a naked 7 year old girl?
>> >
>> >Why, why, WHY?????
>>
>> The whole world's watching.
>
>The hills are alive...
>with the sound of... crickets.
>
>WHY, Greegor?
Checkmate
Apr 19, 2012, 2:15:11 PM4/19/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
First, check out what Fred Hall said:
>
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:48:39 -0700, Checkmate <Lunati...@The.Edge> wrote in
> <MPG.29f9efd3c...@news.alt.net>:
>
> >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> >Checkmate!
> >
> >First, check out what Fred Hall said:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:22:32 -0700, Checkmate <Lunati...@The.Edge> wrote in
> >> <MPG.29f9e9b3a...@news.alt.net>:
> >>
> >> >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> >> >Checkmate!
> >> >
> >> >First, check out what Fred Hall said:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 06:40:16 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
> >> >> <cb2ebdde-7019-4a97...@x17g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>:
> >> >>
> >> >> >It doesn't take a genius to figure out
> >> >>
> >> >> Why you were in the bathroom with a naked 7 year old girl?
> >> >
> >> >Why, why, WHY?????
> >>
> >> The whole world's watching.
> >
> >The hills are alive...
> >with the sound of... crickets.
> >
> >WHY, Greegor?
> WHY, Greegor?
She was only seven... WHY?????
Checkmate!
First, check out what Fred Hall said:
>
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:48:39 -0700, Checkmate <Lunati...@The.Edge> wrote in
> <MPG.29f9efd3c...@news.alt.net>:
>
> >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> >Checkmate!
> >
> >First, check out what Fred Hall said:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:22:32 -0700, Checkmate <Lunati...@The.Edge> wrote in
> >> <MPG.29f9e9b3a...@news.alt.net>:
> >>
> >> >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> >> >Checkmate!
> >> >
> >> >First, check out what Fred Hall said:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 06:40:16 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
> >> >> <cb2ebdde-7019-4a97...@x17g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>:
> >> >>
> >> >> >It doesn't take a genius to figure out
> >> >>
> >> >> Why you were in the bathroom with a naked 7 year old girl?
> >> >
> >> >Why, why, WHY?????
> >>
> >> The whole world's watching.
> >
> >The hills are alive...
> >with the sound of... crickets.
> >
> >WHY, Greegor?
> WHY, Greegor?
Fred Hall
Apr 19, 2012, 2:49:43 PM4/19/12
to
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 11:15:11 -0700, Checkmate <Lunati...@The.Edge> wrote in
<MPG.29f9f60ff...@news.alt.net>:
>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>Checkmate!
>
>First, check out what Fred Hall said:
>
>
>>
>> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:48:39 -0700, Checkmate <Lunati...@The.Edge> wrote in
>> <MPG.29f9efd3c...@news.alt.net>:
>>
>> >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>> >Checkmate!
>> >
>> >First, check out what Fred Hall said:
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:22:32 -0700, Checkmate <Lunati...@The.Edge> wrote in
>> >> <MPG.29f9e9b3a...@news.alt.net>:
>> >>
>> >> >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>> >> >Checkmate!
>> >> >
>> >> >First, check out what Fred Hall said:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 06:40:16 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
>> >> >> <cb2ebdde-7019-4a97...@x17g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >It doesn't take a genius to figure out
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Why you were in the bathroom with a naked 7 year old girl?
>> >> >
>> >> >Why, why, WHY?????
>> >>
>> >> The whole world's watching.
>> >
>> >The hills are alive...
>> >with the sound of... crickets.
>> >
>> >WHY, Greegor?
>> WHY, Greegor?
>She was only seven... WHY?????
She was naked, vulnerable.WHY???
<MPG.29f9f60ff...@news.alt.net>:
>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>Checkmate!
>
>First, check out what Fred Hall said:
>
>
>>
>> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:48:39 -0700, Checkmate <Lunati...@The.Edge> wrote in
>> <MPG.29f9efd3c...@news.alt.net>:
>>
>> >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>> >Checkmate!
>> >
>> >First, check out what Fred Hall said:
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:22:32 -0700, Checkmate <Lunati...@The.Edge> wrote in
>> >> <MPG.29f9e9b3a...@news.alt.net>:
>> >>
>> >> >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>> >> >Checkmate!
>> >> >
>> >> >First, check out what Fred Hall said:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 06:40:16 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
>> >> >> <cb2ebdde-7019-4a97...@x17g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >It doesn't take a genius to figure out
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Why you were in the bathroom with a naked 7 year old girl?
>> >> >
>> >> >Why, why, WHY?????
>> >>
>> >> The whole world's watching.
>> >
>> >The hills are alive...
>> >with the sound of... crickets.
>> >
>> >WHY, Greegor?
>> WHY, Greegor?
>She was only seven... WHY?????
Message has been deleted
Greegor
Apr 21, 2012, 6:12:11 AM4/21/12
to
KBW > What's really interesting is that Greg knew
KBW > what the debt was for. The court web site
KBW > doesn't mention what the debt was in regards
KBW > to, but Greg KNOWS it's heating oil.
G > The debt owed by the other Greg Hanson is
KBW > what the debt was for. The court web site
KBW > doesn't mention what the debt was in regards
KBW > to, but Greg KNOWS it's heating oil.
G > owed to a company that sells bulk oil.
G >
G > It doesn't take a genius to figure out what the bill is for.
G >
G > How else do you think somebody could end
G > up owing almost 3K to an oil company?
G >
G > The very OLD garnishment against the guy
G > with the same first and last name as me
G > does not specify any middle name or DOB.
G >
G > My court records before and after that all
G > have my middle name and DOB don't they, Kent?
G >
G > The guy doesn't owe a "debt to society".
G > He owes the money to an oil company.
Checkmate > Pay your bill, you free-loading chump.
Wrong Greg Hanson.
Kent knows he's talking about the wrong person's records.
He's hoping to distract from his own records.
Kent has rotated through various types of denials,
some of which are not compatible with the others.
Kent used a few stooges and socks to help him
try to sell his false denials. The funniest part is
that Kent's APPEAL reflects the same kind of
idiocy that Kent tries on usenet.
http://5magazine.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/img_0271.jpg
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
Screen Captures further proving the ID on Kent is correct.
http://immaculatecongestion.blogspot.com/
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.alien.visitors/msg/7bb21a6718c8504c
Sun, 15 Jun 2003 03:46:12 [...]
KBW 2003 > I was born in Krakow, Poland on
KBW 2003 > Jan. 8, 1969. I grew up there, and
KBW 2003 > in the mid 80's I came to the US.
http://www.lexisone.com/lx1/caselaw/freecaselaw?action=OCLGetCaseDetail&format=FULL&sourceID=beeheh&searchTerm=eHdU.Zbaa.aadj.eabQ&searchFlag=y&l1loc=FCLOW
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ia-supreme-court/1360099.html
Photo of Kent's shack at 1110 South F Street, Rogers, Arkansas
72756-5520
http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&biw=1020&bih=602&q=1110+South+F+Street,+Rogers,+Arkansas+72756-5520
In the PHOTO (left side) look for the RED CHAIR on the front
"stoop"! LOL
http://cbk2.google.com/cbk?output=thumbnail&cb_client=maps_sv&thumb=2&thumbfov=30&ll=36.322943,-94.107730&cbll=36.322971,-94.107481
http://cbk2.google.com/cbk?output=thumbnail&cb_client=maps_sv&thumb=2&thumbfov=100&ll=36.322943,-94.107730&cbll=36.322971,-94.107481
http://cbk2.google.com/cbk?output=thumbnail&thumb=1&ll=36.322943,-94.107730&cbll=36.322971,-94.107481
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/
Iowa Courts
Online Search
< Start A Case Search Here! > click
Iowa Courts Online Search
Search Selection
Under Trial Court < click on Case Search >
Wills Kent B
02401 ESPR015146 INA J WILLS ESTATE
05771 FECR145250 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
05771 FECR176876 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
05771 SCSC310505 SWEENEY RENTALS VS KENT ******
05771 SCSC335210 CITI FINANCIAL VS KENT
05771 SCSC374163 SFI F SCHERLE PRES VS KENT
05771 SCSC374164 SFI F SCHERLE III PRES VS KENT
05771 STAN201670 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969
05771 STAN210929 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969
05771 SWCR177169 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
A list of case numbers will be presented.
Click on the SECOND Felony ending with 876.
Under the "Charges" tab:
Charges, Dispositions, Sentences
Title: STATE VS KENT BRADLEY WILLS
Case: 05771 FECR176876 (POLK)
Citation Number:
[ These notes are still ONLINE and verifiable under CHARGES ]
[ Text compressed for presentation on usenet ]
Charges, Dispositions, Sentences
Title: STATE VS KENT BRADLEY WILLS
Case: 05771 FECR176876 (POLK)
Citation Number:
Count 01
08/12/2003 Offense Date BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
12/17/2003 Adj.Date: GUILTY
01/16/2004 Sentence 10 Year(s) SUSPENDED PRISON
01/16/2004 Sentence: PROBATION 2 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: RESIDENTIAL FACILITY FT DSM FACILITY-MAX
BENEFITS
01/16/2004 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE 150 Hour(s)
12/17/2003 Sentence: JO-PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09
01/25/2006 Sentence: IMPOSED PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 01/16/09
Count 02
08/12/2003 Offense BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR VEHICLE
(AGMS)
12/17/2003 GUILTY
01/16/2004 Sentence: PRISON Duration: 2 Year(s) SUSPENDED PRISON
01/16/2004 Sentence: PROBATION Duration: 2 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: RESIDENTIAL FACILITY FT DSM FACILITY-MAX
BENEFITS
01/16/2004 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE Duration: 150 Hour(s)
12/17/2003 Sentence: JO-PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09
01/25/2006 Sentence: IMPOSED PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 01/06/09
Count 03
08/12/2003 USING JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE OFFENSE(FELC)709A.
6(2)
12/17/2003 GUILTY
01/16/2004 Sentence: PRISON Duration: 10 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: SUSPENDED PRISON 10 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: PROBATION 2 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: RESIDENTIAL FACILITY FT DSM FACILITY-MAX
BENEFITS
01/16/2004 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE 150 Hour(s)
12/17/2003 Sentence: JO-PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09
01/25/2006 Sentence: IMPOSED PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 01/16/09
http://fifthdcs.com/addresses.cfm?location=fort
Fifth Judicial District Department of Correctional Services
Fort Des Moines Community Corrections Complex
Main Phone Number: (515) 242-6900
http://www.lexisone.com/lx1/caselaw/freecaselaw?action=OCLGetCaseDetail&format=FULL&sourceID=beeheh&searchTerm=eHdU.Zbaa.aadj.eabQ&searchFlag=y&l1loc=FCLOW
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ia-supreme-court/1360099.html
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 31 / 04-0202
Filed May 6, 2005
STATE OF IOWA,
Appellee,
vs.
KENT BRADLEY WILLS,
Appellant.
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk
County, Michael D. Huppert, Judge.
Defendant appeals claiming ineffective
assistance of counsel. AFFIRMED.
Linda Del Gallo, State Appellate Defender,
and Tricia Johnston, Assistant State
Appellate Defender, for appellant.
Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Kevin
Cmelik, Assistant Attorney General, John P.
Sarcone, County Attorney, and John Judisch,
Assistant County Attorney, for appellee.
WIGGINS, Justice.
Kent Wills appeals his conviction for
second-degree burglary contending that
an attached garage is a separate occupied
structure from that of the living quarters
of the residence. In this appeal, we must
determine whether trial counsel was
ineffective for (1) failing to move for
judgment of acquittal on the basis there
was insufficient evidence to convict Wills
of second-degree burglary when he entered
an attached garage of a residence when no
persons were present in the garage, but
when persons were present in the living
quarters; and (2) failing to object to a
jury instruction based on this same
argument. Because we find there was no
legal basis for the motion for judgment
of acquittal or the objection to the jury
instruction, Wills' trial counsel was not
ineffective. Accordingly, we affirm the
judgment of the district court.
I. Background Facts and Proceedings.
Around 1 a.m., an Ankeny resident called
the local police to report that a car
alarm sounded in the resident's
neighborhood. The city dispatched a police
officer to the location. Observing nothing
unusual, the officer left the area, only
to be stopped a couple of blocks later
by a person who informed the officer he
had witnessed someone running from the
area of the car alarm. As the officer
started driving back to the area of the
car alarm, he noticed a person walking
on the sidewalk. The officer asked the
person, a minor, if he had noticed anybody
running from the area. The minor answered
that he had not. While the officer and
another officer were speaking to the minor,
another resident of the neighborhood
arrived in her car and informed the
officers that she had observed two people,
one of whom was heavy set with a blinking
light on his back pocket, walking in the
area of her neighbor's residence. She
observed the heavier-set individual, later
identified as Wills, enter her neighbor's
attached garage through an unlocked service
door. She further observed a smaller
individual standing by a van parked in
the neighbor's driveway.
The officers eventually let the minor leave
even though they found a large amount of
coins, a flashlight, and an electronic
pocket organizer in his pockets. After
releasing the minor, the police officers
drove to the residence where the neighbor
observed the two suspicious people and
woke the owner. The owner, his wife,
and two daughters were in the residence
sleeping at the time. After a search
of his vehicles, the owner discovered
change and an electronic pocket organizer
were missing from the vehicles. The
owner's daughter reported a diamond ring
and some change were missing from her
vehicle. The officers then contacted
the minor's parents, who informed the
officers the minor was with Wills. After
the officers questioned the minor again,
he admitted his involvement in the theft
and implicated Wills in the burglary.
Although Wills denied involvement in the
burglary, the officers arrested him.
The State filed a trial information
charging Wills with second-degree
burglary. The State later amended the
information to include two additional
charges of burglary in the third degree
and using a juvenile to commit an
indictable offense.
The jury returned a verdict finding Wills
guilty of the crimes of burglary in the
second degree, burglary in the third
degree, and using a juvenile to commit
an indictable offense. Wills appeals his
conviction for second-degree burglary
claiming ineffective assistance of
counsel.
II. Scope of Review.
Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel
are derived from the Sixth Amendment of the
United States Constitution. Strickland v.
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 684-86, 104 S.
Ct. 2052, 2063-64, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674, 691-93
(1984). Our review for a claim involving
violations of the Constitution is de novo.
State v. Fintel, 689 N.W.2d 95, 100
(Iowa 2004). We normally preserve
ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims
for postconviction relief actions. State
v. Carter, 602 N.W. 2d 818, 820 (Iowa 1999).
However, we will address such claims on
direct appeal when the record is sufficient
to permit a ruling. State v. Artzer,
609 N.W.2d 526, 531 (Iowa 2000). The
appellate record in the present case is
sufficient to allow us to address Wills'
ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims
on direct appeal.
In order for a defendant to succeed on a
claim of ineffective assistance of counsel,
the defendant must prove: (1) counsel
failed to perform an essential duty and
(2) prejudice resulted. Id. Prejudice
results when "there is a reasonable
probability that, but for the counsel's
unprofessional errors, the result of the
proceeding would have been different."
State v. Hopkins, 576 N.W.2d 374, 378
(Iowa 1998) (quoting Strickland, 466
U.S. at 694, 104 S. Ct. at 2068,
80 L. Ed. 2d at 698). Wills' arguments
also raise issues of statutory
interpretation, which we review for
correction of errors at law. State v.
Wolford Corp., 689 N.W.2d 471, 473 (Iowa 2004).
III. Analysis.
To find Wills guilty of burglary in the
second degree, the State had to prove
Wills perpetrated a burglary "in or
upon an occupied structure in which one
or more persons are present . . . ." Iowa
Code § 713.5(2) (2003) (emphasis added).
In this appeal, Wills first contends his
trial counsel was ineffective for failing
to move for a judgment of acquittal on
the basis there was insufficient evidence
to support a finding that at the time Wills
entered the garage, there were persons
present in or upon the occupied structure.
Wills concedes the garage was an occupied
structure, but argues the living quarters
and the attached garage are separate and
independent occupied structures; therefore,
the jury could not have found there were
people present in the attached garage
at the time of the burglary.
The Code defines an "occupied structure" as:
[A]ny building, structure, appurtenances
to buildings and structures, land, water
or air vehicle, or similar place adapted
for overnight accommodation of persons,
or occupied by persons for the purpose of
carrying on business or other activity
therein, or for the storage or safekeeping
of anything of value. Such a structure
is an "occupied structure" whether or not
a person is actually present.
Id. § 702.12.
Wills relies on State v. Smothers, 590
N.W.2d 721 (Iowa 1999), to argue the
garage and the living quarters are separate
and independent occupied structures. In
Smothers, two separate and distinct
businesses connected by interior fire doors
were operated in the same structure.
590 N.W.2d at 723. We held the defendant
committed two burglaries by entering each
business because "[t]he facility's
construction history and physical make-up
demonstrate that the portions are
independent working units which constitute
'[a] combination of materials to form a
construction for occupancy [or] use.'" Id.
Smothers is not at odds with the present
case because the living quarters and the
garage are not separate or independent
units of the residence.
Our review of the record reveals the garage
in question was a three-car attached garage
separated from the living quarters by a
door. The same roof covered the garage as
the rest of the residence. The living
quarters surrounded the garage on two sides.
It was structurally no different from any
other room in the residence.
The garage was a functional part of the
residence. On the night of the incident,
the door was unlocked. The owner of the
residence used two stalls in the garage to
park the family vehicles. The owner used
the third stall for his motorcycle. As
such, the garage and the living quarters
are a single "structure" or "building"
functioning as an integral part of the
family residence. Thus, the residence
including the garage is a single
"occupied structure" under section 702.12.
See, e.g., People v. Ingram, 48 Cal. Rptr.
2d 256 (Ct. App.1995) (holding defendant's
entry into an attached garage constituted
first-degree burglary because the garage
was attached to the house; therefore,
burglary of the garage was burglary of
an inhabited dwelling house); People v.
Cunningham, 637 N.E.2d 1247, 1252 (Ill.
App. Ct. 1994) (holding "ordinarily an
attached garage is a 'dwelling' because
it is part of the structure in which
the owner or occupant lives");
State v. Lara, 587 P.2d 52, 53
(N.M. Ct. App. 1978) (holding "burglary
of the [attached] garage was burglary of
the dwelling house because the garage was
a part of the structure used as living
quarters"); People v. Green, 141 A.D.2d
760, 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988) (holding
"[s]ince the garage in the present case
was structurally part of a building
which was used for overnight lodging of
various persons, it must be considered
as part of a dwelling"); White v. State,
630 S.W. 2d 340, 342 (Tex. Ct. App. 1982)
(holding an attached garage under the
same roof as the home would be considered
a habitation within the purview of the
penal code because the garage is a
structure appurtenant to and connected
to the house); State v. Murbach, 843 P.
2d 551, 553 (Wash. Ct. App 1993)
(holding the definition of a dwelling
under Washington's burglary statute
included an attached garage).
Had Wills' trial counsel moved for a
judgment of acquittal on the basis there
was insufficient evidence to support
a finding that at the time Wills
entered the garage there were no persons
present in or upon the occupied
structure, it would have been overruled
by the court because the owner and his
family were present in the residence at
the time of the burglary.
Wills also claims his counsel was
ineffective for failing to object to
the jury instruction used by the district
court on the same ground; that the
living quarters were a separate and
independent occupied structure from the
attached garage. The instruction as
given stated:
The State must prove all of the following
elements of Burglary in the Second
Degree as to Count I:
1. On or about the 12th day of August,
2003, the defendant or someone he aided
and abetted broke into or entered the
residence at . . . .
2. The residence at . . . was an occupied
structure as defined in Instruction No. 29.
3. The defendant or the person he aided
and abetted did not have permission or
authority to break into the residence at ...
4. The defendant or the person he aided
and abetted did so with the specific
intent to commit a theft therein.
5. During the incident persons were present
in or upon the occupied structure.
If the State has proved all of the elements,
the defendant is guilty of Burglary in the
Second Degree. If the State has failed to prove
any of the elements, the defendant is not
guilty of Burglary in the Second Degree and
you will then consider the charge of
Attempted Burglary in the Second Degree
explained in Instruction No. 21.
(Emphasis added.)
Wills' claim is without merit. As we have
discussed, the residence is the one and
only "occupied structure" under the facts
of this case. Had Wills' trial counsel
made this objection to the instruction,
it would have been overruled.
Therefore, Wills' trial counsel is not
ineffective for failing to move
for a judgment of acquittal or objecting
to the instruction because there was no
legal basis for the motion or objection.
See State v. Hochmuth, 585 N.W.2d 234,
238 (Iowa 1998) (holding trial counsel was
not ineffective for failing to raise an
issue that has no merit).
IV. Disposition.
We affirm the judgment of the district
court because Wills' trial counsel was
not ineffective for failing to raise
meritless issues.
AFFIRMED.
Message has been deleted
Greegor
Apr 21, 2012, 12:38:37 PM4/21/12
to
> >KBW > What's really interesting is that Greg knew
> >KBW > what the debt was for. The court web site
> >KBW > doesn't mention what the debt was in regards
> >KBW > to, but Greg KNOWS it's heating oil.
>
> >G > The debt owed by the other Greg Hanson is
> >G > owed to a company that sells bulk oil.
> >G >
> >G > It doesn't take a genius to figure out what the bill is for.
> >G >
> >G > How else do you think somebody could end
> >G > up owing almost 3K to an oil company?
> >G >
> >G > The very OLD garnishment against the guy
> >G > with the same first and last name as me
> >G > does not specify any middle name or DOB.
> >G >
> >G > My court records before and after that all
> >G > have my middle name and DOB don't they, Kent?
> >G >
> >G > The guy doesn't owe a "debt to society".
> >G > He owes the money to an oil company.
>
> >Checkmate > Pay your bill, you free-loading chump.
G > Wrong Greg Hanson.
> >KBW > what the debt was for. The court web site
> >KBW > doesn't mention what the debt was in regards
> >KBW > to, but Greg KNOWS it's heating oil.
>
> >G > The debt owed by the other Greg Hanson is
> >G > owed to a company that sells bulk oil.
> >G >
> >G > It doesn't take a genius to figure out what the bill is for.
> >G >
> >G > How else do you think somebody could end
> >G > up owing almost 3K to an oil company?
> >G >
> >G > The very OLD garnishment against the guy
> >G > with the same first and last name as me
> >G > does not specify any middle name or DOB.
> >G >
> >G > My court records before and after that all
> >G > have my middle name and DOB don't they, Kent?
> >G >
> >G > The guy doesn't owe a "debt to society".
> >G > He owes the money to an oil company.
>
> >Checkmate > Pay your bill, you free-loading chump.
G > Kent knows he's talking about the wrong person's records.
KBW > You outted yourself when you offered
KBW > details not available to those who
KBW > were not a party to the case.
Such details as..?
Message has been deleted
Greegor
Apr 21, 2012, 3:12:48 PM4/21/12
to
> >> >KBW > What's really interesting is that Greg knew
> >> >KBW > what the debt was for. The court web site
> >> >KBW > doesn't mention what the debt was in regards
> >> >KBW > to, but Greg KNOWS it's heating oil.
>
> >> >G > The debt owed by the other Greg Hanson is
> >> >G > owed to a company that sells bulk oil.
> >> >G >
> >> >G > It doesn't take a genius to figure out what the bill is for.
> >> >G >
> >> >G > How else do you think somebody could end
> >> >G > up owing almost 3K to an oil company?
> >> >G >
> >> >G > The very OLD garnishment against the guy
> >> >G > with the same first and last name as me
> >> >G > does not specify any middle name or DOB.
> >> >G >
> >> >G > My court records before and after that all
> >> >G > have my middle name and DOB don't they, Kent?
> >> >G >
> >> >G > The guy doesn't owe a "debt to society".
> >> >G > He owes the money to an oil company.
>
> >> >Checkmate > Pay your bill, you free-loading chump.
>
G > Wrong Greg Hanson.
G > Kent knows he's talking about the wrong person's records.
> >> You outted yourself when you offered details not available to those
> >> >KBW > what the debt was for. The court web site
> >> >KBW > doesn't mention what the debt was in regards
> >> >KBW > to, but Greg KNOWS it's heating oil.
>
> >> >G > The debt owed by the other Greg Hanson is
> >> >G > owed to a company that sells bulk oil.
> >> >G >
> >> >G > It doesn't take a genius to figure out what the bill is for.
> >> >G >
> >> >G > How else do you think somebody could end
> >> >G > up owing almost 3K to an oil company?
> >> >G >
> >> >G > The very OLD garnishment against the guy
> >> >G > with the same first and last name as me
> >> >G > does not specify any middle name or DOB.
> >> >G >
> >> >G > My court records before and after that all
> >> >G > have my middle name and DOB don't they, Kent?
> >> >G >
> >> >G > The guy doesn't owe a "debt to society".
> >> >G > He owes the money to an oil company.
>
> >> >Checkmate > Pay your bill, you free-loading chump.
>
G > Wrong Greg Hanson.
G > Kent knows he's talking about the wrong person's records.
> >> who were not a party to the case.
> >> I still acknowledge that when you showed you KNOW it was heating
> >>oil that caused the garnishment, you may have been lying.
G > Such details as..?
KBW > One of them is listed above.
Kent you lived in Iowa once.
Did you ever hear of Hawkeye oil?
http://start.cortera.com/company/research/k3s9pso9q/hawkeye-oil-co-inc/
I think it got sold, but I'm not dead certain.
What ELSE would somebody owe $ 3K to "Hawkeye Oil" for, Kent?
Fred Hall
Apr 21, 2012, 7:21:05 PM4/21/12
to
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 12:12:48 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
<fa5e6773-d837-4d3d...@n19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>:
>Such details as..
Being in the bathroom with a naked 7 year old girl
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
<fa5e6773-d837-4d3d...@n19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>:
>Such details as..
Being in the bathroom with a naked 7 year old girl
Message has been deleted
Fred Hall
Apr 21, 2012, 11:16:30 PM4/21/12
to
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 19:53:08 -0700, "In a very dark China Blue, China
Blue condition." <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote in
<chine.bleu-57698...@news.x-privat.org>:
>In article <jmvem2$19i$2...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>,
>Easter dress (http://www.artic.edu/aic/collections/artwork/154287).
>
>It is normal for a caregiver to be around their naked young children; it would
>be hard to change diapers and bathe them otherwise. When children begin to find
>it uncomfortable varies, but if a girl is still comfortable with it at seven, it
>would be more traumatising to make her ashamed.
>
>In some cultures people are naked or nearly naked their entire lives. I haven't
>heard them having more a problem with sexual assault than any other culture.
I will not swallow your hook. I am busy trying to decide if I want
fried chicken or ramen noodles. Perhaps after I eat.
Blue condition." <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote in
<chine.bleu-57698...@news.x-privat.org>:
>In article <jmvem2$19i$2...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>,
> Fred Hall <fkh...@databasix.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 12:12:48 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
>> <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
>> <fa5e6773-d837-4d3d...@n19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>:
>>
>> >Such details as..
>>
>> Being in the bathroom with a naked 7 year old girl
>
>Have you ever seen Sally Mann's photos of her children? My favourite is the
>
>> On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 12:12:48 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
>> <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
>> <fa5e6773-d837-4d3d...@n19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>:
>>
>> >Such details as..
>>
>> Being in the bathroom with a naked 7 year old girl
>
>Easter dress (http://www.artic.edu/aic/collections/artwork/154287).
>
>It is normal for a caregiver to be around their naked young children; it would
>be hard to change diapers and bathe them otherwise. When children begin to find
>it uncomfortable varies, but if a girl is still comfortable with it at seven, it
>would be more traumatising to make her ashamed.
>
>In some cultures people are naked or nearly naked their entire lives. I haven't
>heard them having more a problem with sexual assault than any other culture.
I will not swallow your hook. I am busy trying to decide if I want
fried chicken or ramen noodles. Perhaps after I eat.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Apr 22, 2012, 8:57:54 PM4/22/12
to
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 03:51:29 +0000 (UTC), This account has been banned
because it violated the Google Groups Terms Of Use <laug...@u.kook>
wrote in <56407de7529e53cc...@not-for-mail.invalid>:
>Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>>Such details as..?
>
>Hanson is considered to be a kook because he does that sort of thing.
>
>His kookery doesn't justify yours.
IAWTP
>
>--
>Greegor 'Rock Hard Stupid' Hanson shows how he cannot count to five:
>Subject: Kalderashi Kent the Krakow Kowboy
>"That's 4 K's, Kent!"
--
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/p/award-winners-1994-2012.html
http://fnvw.databasix.com (awards descriptions and more)
because it violated the Google Groups Terms Of Use <laug...@u.kook>
wrote in <56407de7529e53cc...@not-for-mail.invalid>:
>Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>>Such details as..?
>>
>> One of them is listed above.
>
>Like where you put Rock Hard Stupid Hanson's address in the subject header?
>> One of them is listed above.
>
>
>Hanson is considered to be a kook because he does that sort of thing.
>
>His kookery doesn't justify yours.
IAWTP
>
>--
>Greegor 'Rock Hard Stupid' Hanson shows how he cannot count to five:
>Subject: Kalderashi Kent the Krakow Kowboy
>"That's 4 K's, Kent!"
--
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/p/award-winners-1994-2012.html
http://fnvw.databasix.com (awards descriptions and more)
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Apr 22, 2012, 9:00:04 PM4/22/12
to
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 04:01:33 -0500, Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com>
wrote in <t4i7p7d315n6bqvbb...@4ax.com>:
>On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 03:51:29 +0000 (UTC), This account has been banned
>because it violated the Google Groups Terms Of Use <laug...@u.kook>
>wrote:
> Soon he will claim his own standard regarding this is an act of
>deception, since it's being used against him.
So, what you're saying is that you are comfortable knowing you and
Greegor have the same standards?
wrote in <t4i7p7d315n6bqvbb...@4ax.com>:
>On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 03:51:29 +0000 (UTC), This account has been banned
>because it violated the Google Groups Terms Of Use <laug...@u.kook>
>
>>Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>Such details as..?
>>>
>>> One of them is listed above.
>>
>>Like where you put Rock Hard Stupid Hanson's address in the subject header?
>>
>
> I've simply adopted his standards.
>>Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>Such details as..?
>>>
>>> One of them is listed above.
>>
>>Like where you put Rock Hard Stupid Hanson's address in the subject header?
>>
>
> Soon he will claim his own standard regarding this is an act of
>deception, since it's being used against him.
So, what you're saying is that you are comfortable knowing you and
Greegor have the same standards?
Fred Hall
Apr 22, 2012, 10:38:50 PM4/22/12
to
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 21:05:17 -0700, "In a very dark China Blue, China
>In article <jmvsfl$j84$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>,
>I know that calling people child molestors is the current variant in calling
>them witches or commies.
Ok, in case you're interested, I decided on the ramen noodles last
night. The chicken is frying as I type this evening.
Yes, calling people child molestors has replaced calling people
commies or witches. I agree with you. However, I don't believe I've
ever called Greegor a child molestor. I called him a child abuser. So
did the state of Iowa. The facts:
1) Greegor was in the bathroom with a naked 6 or 7 year old
2) The child was removed from his home by CPS due to abuse
3) The child's mother never regained custody of the child
*Something* happened in that bathroom. The state asserted that the
little girl's head was immersed in water. Greegor claims he was only
rinsing the girl's hair.
Do people lose custody of their children just because they rinsed soap
from a child's hair?
Blue condition." <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote in
<chine.bleu-7086A...@news.x-privat.org>:
>In article <jmvsfl$j84$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>,
>them witches or commies.
Ok, in case you're interested, I decided on the ramen noodles last
night. The chicken is frying as I type this evening.
Yes, calling people child molestors has replaced calling people
commies or witches. I agree with you. However, I don't believe I've
ever called Greegor a child molestor. I called him a child abuser. So
did the state of Iowa. The facts:
1) Greegor was in the bathroom with a naked 6 or 7 year old
2) The child was removed from his home by CPS due to abuse
3) The child's mother never regained custody of the child
*Something* happened in that bathroom. The state asserted that the
little girl's head was immersed in water. Greegor claims he was only
rinsing the girl's hair.
Do people lose custody of their children just because they rinsed soap
from a child's hair?
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Apr 23, 2012, 5:14:09 AM4/23/12
to
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 03:36:11 -0500, Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com>
wrote in <o35ap750sia5qk1hd...@4ax.com>:
>On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 20:00:04 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>Wrangler <fn...@databasix.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 04:01:33 -0500, Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com>
>>wrote in <t4i7p7d315n6bqvbb...@4ax.com>:
>>
>>>On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 03:51:29 +0000 (UTC), This account has been banned
>>>because it violated the Google Groups Terms Of Use <laug...@u.kook>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>Such details as..?
>>>>>
>>>>> One of them is listed above.
>>>>
>>>>Like where you put Rock Hard Stupid Hanson's address in the subject header?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I've simply adopted his standards.
>>> Soon he will claim his own standard regarding this is an act of
>>>deception, since it's being used against him.
>>
>>So, what you're saying is that you are comfortable knowing you and
>>Greegor have the same standards?
>
> That's not the claim I made.
> I do find it of interest that Greg's posting what he claims to be
>the real life information of others seems to be acceptable to you, but
>should anyone else dare to do to him the same, they've crossed the
>line.
I do not find RHS's posting R/L information acceptable. Greegor is a
fullblown kook and net.scum.
wrote in <o35ap750sia5qk1hd...@4ax.com>:
>On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 20:00:04 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>Wrangler <fn...@databasix.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 04:01:33 -0500, Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com>
>>wrote in <t4i7p7d315n6bqvbb...@4ax.com>:
>>
>>>On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 03:51:29 +0000 (UTC), This account has been banned
>>>because it violated the Google Groups Terms Of Use <laug...@u.kook>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>Such details as..?
>>>>>
>>>>> One of them is listed above.
>>>>
>>>>Like where you put Rock Hard Stupid Hanson's address in the subject header?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I've simply adopted his standards.
>>> Soon he will claim his own standard regarding this is an act of
>>>deception, since it's being used against him.
>>
>>So, what you're saying is that you are comfortable knowing you and
>>Greegor have the same standards?
>
> I do find it of interest that Greg's posting what he claims to be
>the real life information of others seems to be acceptable to you, but
>should anyone else dare to do to him the same, they've crossed the
>line.
I do not find RHS's posting R/L information acceptable. Greegor is a
fullblown kook and net.scum.
Greegor
Apr 23, 2012, 3:43:26 PM4/23/12
to
KentMoe's pretense that I outed them first is a lie.
Kent LONG AGO and repeatedly posted what he thought
was my home address. ( Look at Kent's repeated sig. )
One of their allies had been doing it and they
"joined in" at posting what they THOUGHT was
my home address and phone number.
I don't ascribe to your AUK'er ""rule"" against
outing people, but Kent's pretense that I outed
him first is just another of Kent's lies.
Kent had actually outed himself if you consider
that he posted his own DOB, bragged about the
apartment building, bragged about the boat and
announced his sisters wedding BY NAME on usenet.
As I'm sure that several of you AUK'ers know
you do not have to BEAT a woman to get nailed
for Domestic Abuse. What AUK'er would admit
that they know this?
As I'm sure that some of you AUK'ers know,
a CPS or child removal action does NOT require
any child abuse at all. In fact, the caseworkers
were technically guilty of kidnapping because for
the first THREE WEEKS of controlling the child
they did so WITHOUT LEGAL AUTHORITY which is
required. ie: They got caught with lots
of bureaucratic egg on their faces.
(Then they just HAD to come up with SOMETHING!)
Most kids they remove are not for abuse or
neglect at all, but for RISK OF future
abuse or neglect, based on some idiotic voodoo.
The vast majority of kids that CPS removes
from their parents should never have been.
Their OWN statistics ( Yes, they make their own! )
show that a fraction of 1% of child removals
were for blood, broken bones or sexual abuse.
20+% of child removals are because parents
are drug addicted.
Interestingly, because of the insane government
program funding, METH HEADS are more likely
than others to actually get their kids back.
The state is highly motivated to get those
kids back with their parents because they
get massive funding for drug rehab programs
so there is a huge FINANCIAL INCENTIVE for
them to reunify those families.
The other cases are a gravy train for the
state workers and a huge number of CONTRACTORS
each with their hand out in some way.
Reunification would cut off that gravy train.
I was once marked on their social services
registry, but those registries have been
legally struck down as BS by high courts
over and over again, because they are shoddy
and without any due process.
A few states even threw theirs away and stopped
having any such registry at all.
A few others wiped the trashy thing clean to
avoid getting forced to abolish theirs also,
through law suits. Again, because of the
complete lack of any due process whatsoever.
If Kent really were still in Iowa he might
know better than to claim that I AM currently
on the Iowa social services (BS) registry.
Half of all people in general have only ever
heard of the criminal sex offender registry
from the news, and because the never heard of
the stupid social services registry, confuse
the two things which are VERY different from
each other.
When Kent first started harassing me and trying
this haranguing about my misd's it was in
a SUPPORT group.
Isn't there an AUK rule against that?
Somebody said once that Kent was basically
kicked out of AUK for trolling SUPPORT groups.
Is that true?
Kent LONG AGO and repeatedly posted what he thought
was my home address. ( Look at Kent's repeated sig. )
One of their allies had been doing it and they
"joined in" at posting what they THOUGHT was
my home address and phone number.
I don't ascribe to your AUK'er ""rule"" against
outing people, but Kent's pretense that I outed
him first is just another of Kent's lies.
Kent had actually outed himself if you consider
that he posted his own DOB, bragged about the
apartment building, bragged about the boat and
announced his sisters wedding BY NAME on usenet.
As I'm sure that several of you AUK'ers know
you do not have to BEAT a woman to get nailed
for Domestic Abuse. What AUK'er would admit
that they know this?
As I'm sure that some of you AUK'ers know,
a CPS or child removal action does NOT require
any child abuse at all. In fact, the caseworkers
were technically guilty of kidnapping because for
the first THREE WEEKS of controlling the child
they did so WITHOUT LEGAL AUTHORITY which is
required. ie: They got caught with lots
of bureaucratic egg on their faces.
(Then they just HAD to come up with SOMETHING!)
Most kids they remove are not for abuse or
neglect at all, but for RISK OF future
abuse or neglect, based on some idiotic voodoo.
The vast majority of kids that CPS removes
from their parents should never have been.
Their OWN statistics ( Yes, they make their own! )
show that a fraction of 1% of child removals
were for blood, broken bones or sexual abuse.
20+% of child removals are because parents
are drug addicted.
Interestingly, because of the insane government
program funding, METH HEADS are more likely
than others to actually get their kids back.
The state is highly motivated to get those
kids back with their parents because they
get massive funding for drug rehab programs
so there is a huge FINANCIAL INCENTIVE for
them to reunify those families.
The other cases are a gravy train for the
state workers and a huge number of CONTRACTORS
each with their hand out in some way.
Reunification would cut off that gravy train.
I was once marked on their social services
registry, but those registries have been
legally struck down as BS by high courts
over and over again, because they are shoddy
and without any due process.
A few states even threw theirs away and stopped
having any such registry at all.
A few others wiped the trashy thing clean to
avoid getting forced to abolish theirs also,
through law suits. Again, because of the
complete lack of any due process whatsoever.
If Kent really were still in Iowa he might
know better than to claim that I AM currently
on the Iowa social services (BS) registry.
Half of all people in general have only ever
heard of the criminal sex offender registry
from the news, and because the never heard of
the stupid social services registry, confuse
the two things which are VERY different from
each other.
When Kent first started harassing me and trying
this haranguing about my misd's it was in
a SUPPORT group.
Isn't there an AUK rule against that?
Somebody said once that Kent was basically
kicked out of AUK for trolling SUPPORT groups.
Is that true?
Greegor
Apr 23, 2012, 5:17:37 PM4/23/12
to
When's the last time Kent claimed some
opponent CLAIMED this or ADMITTED to that
without actually stating any such thing?
I finally cracked Kent's insane ""logic""
that he used to rationalize some of his
outright LIES.
Kent thinks HE gets to DECIDE that somebody
CLAIMED what they didn't or ADMITTED to
something they never did based on Kent's
own special brand of pretzel logic.
All Kent has to do is CONCLUDE that
his opponent ADMITTED whatever or
INTERPRET something else they said
to have the meaning that KENT decides!
Kent thinks his opponent doesn't have to
actually ADMIT something, Kent can merely
decide that they ADMITTED whatever he wants.
His opponet doesn't have to actually CLAIM
some thing, Kent can merely INTERPRET
something ELSE that they said to be
exactly what Kent WISHES they actually said.
In fact, Kent can now, by EXTENDING some
unrelated logical argument can arrive at the
CONCLUSION that you said whatever Kent wishes
that you said.
Then Kent asks WHY I never caught him in a lie.
ROFL
After I pointed out that Kent's photo caption
saying "Meet and Greet", Kent actually posted
that I therefore CLAIMED Moe was in Iowa with kids.
ie Kent thinks he can ARRIVE at a conclusion that
his opponent CLAIMED something they never did!
Now I'm starting to wonder if Kent arrived
at some conclusion similar to this to
rationalize his GARAGE BURGARY felony back in 2003.
opponent CLAIMED this or ADMITTED to that
without actually stating any such thing?
I finally cracked Kent's insane ""logic""
that he used to rationalize some of his
outright LIES.
Kent thinks HE gets to DECIDE that somebody
CLAIMED what they didn't or ADMITTED to
something they never did based on Kent's
own special brand of pretzel logic.
All Kent has to do is CONCLUDE that
his opponent ADMITTED whatever or
INTERPRET something else they said
to have the meaning that KENT decides!
Kent thinks his opponent doesn't have to
actually ADMIT something, Kent can merely
decide that they ADMITTED whatever he wants.
His opponet doesn't have to actually CLAIM
some thing, Kent can merely INTERPRET
something ELSE that they said to be
exactly what Kent WISHES they actually said.
In fact, Kent can now, by EXTENDING some
unrelated logical argument can arrive at the
CONCLUSION that you said whatever Kent wishes
that you said.
Then Kent asks WHY I never caught him in a lie.
ROFL
After I pointed out that Kent's photo caption
saying "Meet and Greet", Kent actually posted
that I therefore CLAIMED Moe was in Iowa with kids.
ie Kent thinks he can ARRIVE at a conclusion that
his opponent CLAIMED something they never did!
Now I'm starting to wonder if Kent arrived
at some conclusion similar to this to
rationalize his GARAGE BURGARY felony back in 2003.
Jazzy Belle
Apr 23, 2012, 7:28:46 PM4/23/12
to
On Apr 21, 11:05 pm, "In a very dark China Blue, China Blue
condition." <chine.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> In article <jmvsfl$j8...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>,
> > <chine.bleu-57698D.19530721042...@news.x-privat.org>:
>
> > >In article <jmvem2$19...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>,
> > >> <fa5e6773-d837-4d3d-a867-a30dcdb85...@n19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>:
Greegor. He himself in his stupidity tried to explain away certain
instances regarding the seven year old girl and even on usenet slipped
and referred to her in ways that were not of a normal adult's vie of a
child.
Moe
>
> --
> My name Indigo Montoya. | R'lyeh 38o57'6.5''S 102o51'16''E.
> You flamed my father. | I'm whoever you want me to be.
> Prepare to be spanked. | Annoying Usenet one post at a time.
> Stop posting that! | At least I can stay in character.
condition." <chine.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> In article <jmvsfl$j8...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>,
> Fred Hall <fkh...@databasix.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 19:53:08 -0700, "In a very dark China Blue, China
> > Blue condition." <chine.b...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>
>
>
> > On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 19:53:08 -0700, "In a very dark China Blue, China
> > <chine.bleu-57698D.19530721042...@news.x-privat.org>:
>
> > >In article <jmvem2$19...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>,
> > > Fred Hall <fkh...@databasix.com> wrote:
>
> > >> On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 12:12:48 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
> > >> <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in
>
> > >> On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 12:12:48 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
> > >> <fa5e6773-d837-4d3d-a867-a30dcdb85...@n19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>:
>
> > >> >Such details as..
>
> > >> Being in the bathroom with a naked 7 year old girl
>
> > >Have you ever seen Sally Mann's photos of her children? My favourite is the
> > >Easter dress (http://www.artic.edu/aic/collections/artwork/154287).
>
> > >It is normal for a caregiver to be around their naked young children; it
> > >would
> > >be hard to change diapers and bathe them otherwise. When children begin to
> > >find
> > >it uncomfortable varies, but if a girl is still comfortable with it at
> > >seven, it
> > >would be more traumatising to make her ashamed.
>
> > >In some cultures people are naked or nearly naked their entire lives. I
> > >haven't
> > >heard them having more a problem with sexual assault than any other culture.
>
> > I will not swallow your hook. I am busy trying to decide if I want
> > fried chicken or ramen noodles. Perhaps after I eat.
>
> > >> >Such details as..
>
> > >> Being in the bathroom with a naked 7 year old girl
>
> > >Have you ever seen Sally Mann's photos of her children? My favourite is the
> > >Easter dress (http://www.artic.edu/aic/collections/artwork/154287).
>
> > >It is normal for a caregiver to be around their naked young children; it
> > >would
> > >be hard to change diapers and bathe them otherwise. When children begin to
> > >find
> > >it uncomfortable varies, but if a girl is still comfortable with it at
> > >seven, it
> > >would be more traumatising to make her ashamed.
>
> > >In some cultures people are naked or nearly naked their entire lives. I
> > >haven't
> > >heard them having more a problem with sexual assault than any other culture.
>
> > I will not swallow your hook. I am busy trying to decide if I want
> > fried chicken or ramen noodles. Perhaps after I eat.
>
> I know that calling people child molestors is the current variant in calling
> them witches or commies.
In this case there is some evidence to the accusation against
> them witches or commies.
Greegor. He himself in his stupidity tried to explain away certain
instances regarding the seven year old girl and even on usenet slipped
and referred to her in ways that were not of a normal adult's vie of a
child.
Moe
>
> --
> My name Indigo Montoya. | R'lyeh 38o57'6.5''S 102o51'16''E.
> You flamed my father. | I'm whoever you want me to be.
> Prepare to be spanked. | Annoying Usenet one post at a time.
> Stop posting that! | At least I can stay in character.
Checkmate
Apr 23, 2012, 11:17:11 PM4/23/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
Who the fuck cares, Obsesso? Get a fucking life!
--
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012
co-winner, Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker award, May 2001
Copyright © 2012
all rights reserved
"its usually the lesser intelligent person , that comments
on the more intelligent person's , lack of intelligents"
-Dave Keating, AKA "Squiggles" the assworm, AKA %, explaining
intelligence
"we all think what we do has major significants"
-Squiggles explains why he spends so much time on Usenet... and why he
can't play Scrabble
Checkmate!
--
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012
co-winner, Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker award, May 2001
Copyright © 2012
all rights reserved
"its usually the lesser intelligent person , that comments
on the more intelligent person's , lack of intelligents"
-Dave Keating, AKA "Squiggles" the assworm, AKA %, explaining
intelligence
"we all think what we do has major significants"
-Squiggles explains why he spends so much time on Usenet... and why he
can't play Scrabble
Greegor
Apr 23, 2012, 11:27:39 PM4/23/12
to
G > Somebody said once that Kent was basically
G > kicked out of AUK for trolling SUPPORT groups.
G >
G > Is that true?
Checky > Who the fuck cares, Obsesso? Get a fucking life!
You're the tried and true AUK'er, Checky!
Telling somebody else they are
obsessed and to get a life is high comedy.
Or do you have somebody's hand up your backside?
Whose sock are you?
Don't be a stranger now ya hear?
Greegor
Apr 23, 2012, 11:20:57 PM4/23/12
to
> I know that calling people child molestors
> is the current variant in calling
> them witches or commies.
Moe > In this case there is some evidence to
> is the current variant in calling
> them witches or commies.
Moe > the accusation against Greegor. He
Moe > himself in his stupidity tried to
Moe > explain away certain instances regarding
Moe > the seven year old girl and even on
Moe > usenet slipped and referred to her in
Moe > ways that were not of a normal
Moe > adult's [view] of a child.
Do you mean like when I explained that the kid
ran out of the bathroom wrapped in a towel but
with hair that was white with lathered shampoo
and looked like a "Dairy Queen" treat?
You INTERPRETED that to be something fertive
and sexual when it merely described the white
mass of thick shampoo lather with a loop on the top.
Ya got any OTHER great examples of your
fabulous deductive logic, Moe?
Who was that who used to call you Kent's
personal shiteater, Moe?
I never really though of you as a detritivore.
I always thought you made more than you consumed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Detritivore
Fred Hall
Apr 24, 2012, 12:20:41 AM4/24/12
to
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:20:57 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
<e3e9faca-bfeb-4393...@q13g2000vbd.googlegroups.com>:
>Do you mean like when I explained that the kid
>ran out of the bathroom wrapped in a towel but
>with hair that was white with lathered shampoo
>and looked like a "Dairy Queen" treat?
Why was she running from you, child abusing waterboarder?
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
<e3e9faca-bfeb-4393...@q13g2000vbd.googlegroups.com>:
>Do you mean like when I explained that the kid
>ran out of the bathroom wrapped in a towel but
>with hair that was white with lathered shampoo
>and looked like a "Dairy Queen" treat?
%
Apr 24, 2012, 12:47:55 AM4/24/12
to
Fred Hall wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:20:57 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
> <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
> <e3e9faca-bfeb-4393...@q13g2000vbd.googlegroups.com>:
>
>> Do you mean like when I explained that the kid
>> ran out of the bathroom wrapped in a towel but
>> with hair that was white with lathered shampoo
>> and looked like a "Dairy Queen" treat?
>
> Why was she running from you, child abusing waterboarder?
look at fred stealing one of my words again
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:20:57 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
> <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
> <e3e9faca-bfeb-4393...@q13g2000vbd.googlegroups.com>:
>
>> Do you mean like when I explained that the kid
>> ran out of the bathroom wrapped in a towel but
>> with hair that was white with lathered shampoo
>> and looked like a "Dairy Queen" treat?
>
> Why was she running from you, child abusing waterboarder?
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Apr 24, 2012, 7:23:08 AM4/24/12
to
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 05:52:07 -0500, Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com>
wrote in <nd1dp7ho14l6h6ukn...@4ax.com>:
>On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 04:14:09 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>Wrangler <fn...@databasix.com> wrote:
>
>[...]
>"shame" you into it.
You didn't shame me into anything. I generally don't comment much
about real-lifing scum, but if you had been paying attention the last
few months you would have noticed me condemning Alien (award-winner),
Tavek (award-winner), Janithor (award-winner), % (award winner), and
the MMFC (award-winner). Three of the 5 I listed above now reside in
the Galactic Killfile, ineligible for further awards. See the
pattern? You're a grown man, Wills, and have been on Usenet since at
least the mid-90s, so I shouldn't have to explain to you the
difference between acceptable and unacceptable behavior.
The "He did it first and you didn't say anything" excuse is bullshit.
Greegor is a kook, and engages in typical kook behavior. Here's a
link for you:
http://fnvw.databasix.com/twotk.html
"Publishing people's real names, addresses, and phone numbers when
there's no other way for you to come out of a flamewar with any
dignity is cool, and proves that you are a master of secret internet
information stores, and absolutely not to be fucked with."
[snip]
wrote in <nd1dp7ho14l6h6ukn...@4ax.com>:
>On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 04:14:09 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>Wrangler <fn...@databasix.com> wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>>>So, what you're saying is that you are comfortable knowing you and
>>>>Greegor have the same standards?
>>>
>>> That's not the claim I made.
>>> I do find it of interest that Greg's posting what he claims to be
>>>the real life information of others seems to be acceptable to you, but
>>>should anyone else dare to do to him the same, they've crossed the
>>>line.
>>
>>I do not find RHS's posting R/L information acceptable.
>
> Yet you've made no comment about it until now. And I had to
>>>>So, what you're saying is that you are comfortable knowing you and
>>>>Greegor have the same standards?
>>>
>>> That's not the claim I made.
>>> I do find it of interest that Greg's posting what he claims to be
>>>the real life information of others seems to be acceptable to you, but
>>>should anyone else dare to do to him the same, they've crossed the
>>>line.
>>
>>I do not find RHS's posting R/L information acceptable.
>
>"shame" you into it.
You didn't shame me into anything. I generally don't comment much
about real-lifing scum, but if you had been paying attention the last
few months you would have noticed me condemning Alien (award-winner),
Tavek (award-winner), Janithor (award-winner), % (award winner), and
the MMFC (award-winner). Three of the 5 I listed above now reside in
the Galactic Killfile, ineligible for further awards. See the
pattern? You're a grown man, Wills, and have been on Usenet since at
least the mid-90s, so I shouldn't have to explain to you the
difference between acceptable and unacceptable behavior.
The "He did it first and you didn't say anything" excuse is bullshit.
Greegor is a kook, and engages in typical kook behavior. Here's a
link for you:
http://fnvw.databasix.com/twotk.html
"Publishing people's real names, addresses, and phone numbers when
there's no other way for you to come out of a flamewar with any
dignity is cool, and proves that you are a master of secret internet
information stores, and absolutely not to be fucked with."
[snip]
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Greegor
Apr 24, 2012, 10:46:55 AM4/24/12
to
On Apr 24, 6:33 am, "In a very dark China Blue, China Blue condition."
<chine.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> In article <9hrbp71q963a587h241ch25561556qi...@4ax.com>,
> Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > You got locked up, Greg. One is not arrested, tried, convicted
> > and then locked up for pushing away their attacker, as you've tried,
> > and failed, to claim.
>
> You can get arrested and tried for pushing away an attacker. Conviction, on the
> other hand, is an acceptable indicator of guilt.
I volunteered the fact of my DA convictions from 15 years ago.
Kent has been denying the blatant facts of his felony convictions.
Have you ever acknowledged Kent's two thieving felonies
and a misd for using a teen as an accomplice to the
GARAGE BURGLARY?
If you would like me to openly discuss
the practical realities of DA prosecutions,
I expect to see various AUK'ers acknowledge
the blatant facts of their own criminal records.
And I mean more than just Gary Lee, Clayton and Kent.
I have been the most honest and forthright
person about my misdemeanors, actually
volunteering information in a SUPPORT group
whereas quite a few AUK'ers have felony
histories they just don't want to talk about.
The oddest thing is Kent going after me
for my OLD misd's even while his probation
for his more recent and more serious
convictions were ongoing!
Kent actually thought that flood posting,
stacking, double talk, circular reasoning
and even psychopathic reasoning were going
to conceal his blatant and PUBLIC records.
Lies, false claims, pathology about how he
reasoned that somebody "CLAIMED" something
they never actually claimed, etc. None of
this circus has made Kent's records go away.
Kent once tried to claim that the records
were faked by a friend of his as a gag.
On multiple official state court computers?
Tampering with such official records is a
VERY serious offence.
Kent once tried to wipe away his birthday
from his own "Birthday page" when it was
pointed out that it matched his criminal records.
But Kent can't get rid of every proof he
ever posted (himself!) of his actual birthday.
Kent's coprophage stooge Maureen and him tried
to claim that the computer records differ from
the computer records in a way that exhonorates
Kent.
Then Kent and Maureen tried to claim that our
Kent is not the one on the records at all!
These "rotating denials" have brought me some
amusement I must confess.
His failed denials have been vastly more amusing
than it would have been if he had admitted
to his criminal record up front.
I think Kent was afraid of the razzing he
would get, but frankly his denial only made
it worse.
But come on AUK'ers, let Kent know that most
of you actually have such records too!
He'd fit right in with Gary Lee, Clayton Wade
and the many others!
Make Kent feel less ashamed about trying so
hard to conceal his criminal record and failing.
<chine.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> In article <9hrbp71q963a587h241ch25561556qi...@4ax.com>,
> Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > You got locked up, Greg. One is not arrested, tried, convicted
> > and then locked up for pushing away their attacker, as you've tried,
> > and failed, to claim.
>
> You can get arrested and tried for pushing away an attacker. Conviction, on the
> other hand, is an acceptable indicator of guilt.
I volunteered the fact of my DA convictions from 15 years ago.
Kent has been denying the blatant facts of his felony convictions.
Have you ever acknowledged Kent's two thieving felonies
and a misd for using a teen as an accomplice to the
GARAGE BURGLARY?
If you would like me to openly discuss
the practical realities of DA prosecutions,
I expect to see various AUK'ers acknowledge
the blatant facts of their own criminal records.
And I mean more than just Gary Lee, Clayton and Kent.
I have been the most honest and forthright
person about my misdemeanors, actually
volunteering information in a SUPPORT group
whereas quite a few AUK'ers have felony
histories they just don't want to talk about.
The oddest thing is Kent going after me
for my OLD misd's even while his probation
for his more recent and more serious
convictions were ongoing!
Kent actually thought that flood posting,
stacking, double talk, circular reasoning
and even psychopathic reasoning were going
to conceal his blatant and PUBLIC records.
Lies, false claims, pathology about how he
reasoned that somebody "CLAIMED" something
they never actually claimed, etc. None of
this circus has made Kent's records go away.
Kent once tried to claim that the records
were faked by a friend of his as a gag.
On multiple official state court computers?
Tampering with such official records is a
VERY serious offence.
Kent once tried to wipe away his birthday
from his own "Birthday page" when it was
pointed out that it matched his criminal records.
But Kent can't get rid of every proof he
ever posted (himself!) of his actual birthday.
Kent's coprophage stooge Maureen and him tried
to claim that the computer records differ from
the computer records in a way that exhonorates
Kent.
Then Kent and Maureen tried to claim that our
Kent is not the one on the records at all!
These "rotating denials" have brought me some
amusement I must confess.
His failed denials have been vastly more amusing
than it would have been if he had admitted
to his criminal record up front.
I think Kent was afraid of the razzing he
would get, but frankly his denial only made
it worse.
But come on AUK'ers, let Kent know that most
of you actually have such records too!
He'd fit right in with Gary Lee, Clayton Wade
and the many others!
Make Kent feel less ashamed about trying so
hard to conceal his criminal record and failing.
Message has been deleted
Fred Hall
Apr 24, 2012, 10:55:44 AM4/24/12
to
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:46:55 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
<566a576a-2c96-48b5...@2g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>:
Ok, you talked me into it, Greegor. I'm starting to feel sorry for
you now, so let me reveal my dark secret: I post from the Coffield
Unit, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division,
Tennesse Colony, Texas.
http://offender.tdcj.state.tx.us/POSdb2/index.jsp
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
<566a576a-2c96-48b5...@2g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>:
you now, so let me reveal my dark secret: I post from the Coffield
Unit, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division,
Tennesse Colony, Texas.
http://offender.tdcj.state.tx.us/POSdb2/index.jsp
Greegor
Apr 24, 2012, 11:29:06 AM4/24/12
to
G > I volunteered the fact of my DA
G > convictions from 15 years ago.
G > Kent has been denying the blatant
G > facts of his felony convictions.
> And you're an asshole. So?
One can get sentenced to TEN YEARS in prison
and because of their Aspergers pathology the
Judge can suspend that sentence and give them
half way house time and parole even though
the person just got done violating parole again.
Charges, Dispositions, Sentences
Title: STATE VS KENT BRADLEY WILLS
Case: 05771 FECR176876 (POLK)
Citation Number:
Count 01
08/12/2003 Offense Date BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
12/17/2003 Adj.Date: GUILTY
01/16/2004 Sentence 10 Year(s) SUSPENDED PRISON
01/16/2004 Sentence: PROBATION 2 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: RESIDENTIAL FACILITY FT DSM FACILITY-MAX
BENEFITS
01/16/2004 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE 150 Hour(s)
12/17/2003 Sentence: JO-PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09
01/25/2006 Sentence: IMPOSED PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 01/16/09
Count 02
08/12/2003 Offense BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR VEHICLE
(AGMS)
12/17/2003 GUILTY
01/16/2004 Sentence: PRISON Duration: 2 Year(s) SUSPENDED PRISON
01/16/2004 Sentence: PROBATION Duration: 2 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: RESIDENTIAL FACILITY FT DSM FACILITY-MAX
BENEFITS
01/16/2004 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE Duration: 150 Hour(s)
12/17/2003 Sentence: JO-PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09
01/25/2006 Sentence: IMPOSED PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 01/06/09
Count 03
08/12/2003 USING JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE OFFENSE(FELC)709A.
6(2)
12/17/2003 GUILTY
01/16/2004 Sentence: PRISON Duration: 10 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: SUSPENDED PRISON 10 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: PROBATION 2 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: RESIDENTIAL FACILITY FT DSM FACILITY-MAX
BENEFITS
01/16/2004 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE 150 Hour(s)
12/17/2003 Sentence: JO-PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09
01/25/2006 Sentence: IMPOSED PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 01/16/09
Greegor
Apr 24, 2012, 11:34:28 AM4/24/12
to
On Apr 24, 9:55 am, Fred Hall <fkh...@databasix.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:46:55 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
> <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:46:55 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
> <566a576a-2c96-48b5-85b9-a3b778f0b...@2g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>:
I doubt he'll believe it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-XEjSlcrKA
pandora
Apr 24, 2012, 1:54:53 PM4/24/12
to
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 06:23:08 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
wrote:
T'is a lovely document.
> "Publishing people's real names, addresses, and phone numbers when
> there's no other way for you to come out of a flamewar with any dignity
> is cool, and proves that you are a master of secret internet information
> stores, and absolutely not to be fucked with."
>
> [snip]
--
http://www.gramsattic.org
wrote:
> "Publishing people's real names, addresses, and phone numbers when
> there's no other way for you to come out of a flamewar with any dignity
> is cool, and proves that you are a master of secret internet information
> stores, and absolutely not to be fucked with."
>
> [snip]
--
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Greegor
Apr 27, 2012, 10:24:48 AM4/27/12
to
Hi Kent!
Greegor
Apr 29, 2012, 10:49:43 PM4/29/12
to
Message has been deleted
Greegor
May 8, 2012, 4:18:44 PM5/8/12
to
> How sad that you have such a powerful NEED to lie, you are
> COMPELLED to remove the context of your own posts.
> Let your shrink, no matter his/her actual title, know about this at your next session, Greg.
G > Hi Kent!
G > Hi Kent!
> Outside of your drug induced delusions, you and I are not the
> same person, Greg.
> I understand you really do wish you had my life.
Nope.
> However, the
> reality is that you will forever live the life of a sad, lonely,
> pathetic, compulsive liar who fails at everything he ever tries. No amount of your replying to your own posts, claiming you are me, will get you the fulfilling life I have.
> Seriously.
You call being a mythomaniac on usenet a fulfilling life, Kent?
Photo of Kent's shack at 1110 South F Street, Rogers, Arkansas
72756-5520
http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&biw=1020&bih=602&q=1110+South+F+Street,+Rogers,+Arkansas+72756-5520
In the PHOTO (left side) look for the RED CHAIR on the front
"stoop"! LOL
http://cbk2.google.com/cbk?output=thumbnail&thumb=1&ll=36.322943,-94.107730&cbll=36.322971,-94.107481
> COMPELLED to remove the context of your own posts.
> Let your shrink, no matter his/her actual title, know about this at your next session, Greg.
G > Hi Kent!
G > Hi Kent!
> Outside of your drug induced delusions, you and I are not the
> same person, Greg.
> I understand you really do wish you had my life.
Nope.
> However, the
> reality is that you will forever live the life of a sad, lonely,
> pathetic, compulsive liar who fails at everything he ever tries. No amount of your replying to your own posts, claiming you are me, will get you the fulfilling life I have.
> Seriously.
You call being a mythomaniac on usenet a fulfilling life, Kent?
Photo of Kent's shack at 1110 South F Street, Rogers, Arkansas
72756-5520
http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&biw=1020&bih=602&q=1110+South+F+Street,+Rogers,+Arkansas+72756-5520
In the PHOTO (left side) look for the RED CHAIR on the front
"stoop"! LOL
http://cbk2.google.com/cbk?output=thumbnail&thumb=1&ll=36.322943,-94.107730&cbll=36.322971,-94.107481
Checkmate
May 8, 2012, 4:22:54 PM5/8/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
God, will you two EVER get over it?
--
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012
co-winner, Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker award, May 2001
Copyright © 2012
all rights reserved
"its usually the lesser intelligent person , that comments
on the more intelligent person's , lack of intelligents"
-Dave Keating, AKA "Squiggles" the assworm, AKA %, explaining
intelligence
"we all think what we do has major significants"
-Squiggles explains why he spends so much time on Usenet... and why he
can't play Scrabble
Checkmate!
--
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012
co-winner, Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker award, May 2001
Copyright © 2012
all rights reserved
"its usually the lesser intelligent person , that comments
on the more intelligent person's , lack of intelligents"
-Dave Keating, AKA "Squiggles" the assworm, AKA %, explaining
intelligence
"we all think what we do has major significants"
-Squiggles explains why he spends so much time on Usenet... and why he
can't play Scrabble
Greegor
May 8, 2012, 4:37:03 PM5/8/12
to
Checky > God, will you two EVER get over it?
http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/174409_1590888229_2586567_n.jpg
http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/174409_1590888229_2586567_n.jpg
Message has been deleted
Checkmate
May 8, 2012, 8:14:52 PM5/8/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
First, check out what This account has been banned because it violated
Checkmate!
the Google Groups Terms Of Use said:
>
> Checkmate <Lunati...@The.Edge> wrote:
>
> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate!
> >
> > First, check out what Greegor said:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> > How sad that you have such a powerful NEED to lie, you are
> >> > COMPELLED to remove the context of your own posts.
> >> > Let your shrink, no matter his/her actual title, know about
> >> > this at your next session, Greg.
> >>
> >> G > Hi Kent!
> >>
> >> G > Hi Kent!
> >>
> >> > Outside of your drug induced delusions, you and I are not the
> >> > same person, Greg.
> >> > I understand you really do wish you had my life.
> >>
> >> Nope.
> >>
> >> > However, the
> >> > reality is that you will forever live the life of a sad, lonely,
> >> > pathetic, compulsive liar who fails at everything he ever tries. No
> >> > amount of your replying to your own posts, claiming you are me, will
> >> > get you the fulfilling life I have. Seriously.
> >>
> >> You call being a mythomaniac on usenet a fulfilling life, Kent?
> >>
> >> http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&<rl info snipped>
> >> In the PHOTO (left side) look for the RED
> >> CHAIR on the front "stoop"! LOL
> >>
> >> http://cbk2.google.com/cbk?output=thumbnail&thumb=<rl info snipped>
> >> CHAIR on the front "stoop"! LOL
> >>
> >
> > God, will you two EVER get over it?
>
> How about we arrange a boxing match between them at the Front Street gym?
> > God, will you two EVER get over it?
>
Reminds me of those Rock 'Em Sock 'Em Robot things.
%
May 8, 2012, 8:21:22 PM5/8/12
to
Jazzy Belle
May 9, 2012, 4:38:13 PM5/9/12
to
On May 8, 3:22 pm, Checkmate <LunaticFri...@The.Edge> wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!
>
> First, check out what Greegor said:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > > How sad that you have such a powerful NEED to lie, you are
> > > COMPELLED to remove the context of your own posts.
> > > Let your shrink, no matter his/her actual title, know about this at your next session, Greg.
>
> > G > Hi Kent!
>
> > G > Hi Kent!
>
> > > Outside of your drug induced delusions, you and I are not the
> > > same person, Greg.
> > > I understand you really do wish you had my life.
>
> > Nope.
>
> > > However, the
> > > reality is that you will forever live the life of a sad, lonely,
> > > pathetic, compulsive liar who fails at everything he ever tries. No amount of your replying to your own posts, claiming you are me, will get you the fulfilling life I have.
> > > Seriously.
>
> > You call being a mythomaniac on usenet a fulfilling life, Kent?
>
> > Photo of Kent's shack at 1110 South F Street, Rogers, Arkansas
> > 72756-5520
> >http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&biw=1020&bih=602&q=1110+South+F+Str...
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!
>
> First, check out what Greegor said:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > > How sad that you have such a powerful NEED to lie, you are
> > > COMPELLED to remove the context of your own posts.
> > > Let your shrink, no matter his/her actual title, know about this at your next session, Greg.
>
> > G > Hi Kent!
>
> > G > Hi Kent!
>
> > > Outside of your drug induced delusions, you and I are not the
> > > same person, Greg.
> > > I understand you really do wish you had my life.
>
> > Nope.
>
> > > However, the
> > > reality is that you will forever live the life of a sad, lonely,
> > > pathetic, compulsive liar who fails at everything he ever tries. No amount of your replying to your own posts, claiming you are me, will get you the fulfilling life I have.
> > > Seriously.
>
> > You call being a mythomaniac on usenet a fulfilling life, Kent?
>
> > Photo of Kent's shack at 1110 South F Street, Rogers, Arkansas
> > 72756-5520
> > In the PHOTO (left side) look for the RED CHAIR on the front
> > "stoop"! LOL
>
> >http://cbk2.google.com/cbk?output=thumbnail&thumb=1&ll=36.322943,-94....
> > "stoop"! LOL
>
>
> God, will you two EVER get over it?
Greegor is obsessive and has Aspergers. He will never, ever end this
> God, will you two EVER get over it?
crap until he is forced away from any and all access to the internet
or he is physically no longer capable of passing his vomitus online.
Moe
Greegor
May 9, 2012, 7:13:48 PM5/9/12
to
Checky > God, will you two EVER get over it?
http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/174409_1590888229_2586567_n.jpg
Moe > Greegor is obsessive and has Aspergers.
Moe > He will never, ever end this crap until
Moe > he is forced away from any and all
Moe > access to the internet or he is physically
Moe > no longer capable of passing his
Moe > vomitus online.
Maureen stalked and harassed one eBay seller
for TEN YEARS even AFTER she got her refund!
Moe is Kent's excrement eater.
http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/174409_1590888229_2586567_n.jpg
Moe > Greegor is obsessive and has Aspergers.
Moe > He will never, ever end this crap until
Moe > he is forced away from any and all
Moe > access to the internet or he is physically
Moe > no longer capable of passing his
Moe > vomitus online.
Maureen stalked and harassed one eBay seller
for TEN YEARS even AFTER she got her refund!
Moe is Kent's excrement eater.
Greegor
May 10, 2012, 3:17:30 PM5/10/12
to
Hi Moe!
Anon
May 10, 2012, 8:02:44 PM5/10/12
to
him in the killfile.
That's really pethetic and telling.
--
WHO IS 'Sir GREGORY (aka SMEG) HALL' from Alt.Usenet.Kooks (AUK)?
Me! <snicker>
Alien and Anon are the anonymous sock puppets that "Greg" uses daily
GREG HALL is an hairy, abusive, ape-ugly, yellow-toothed, pin-headed,
stalking, coward and spanked retard who likes to surf geriatric porn sites
as 'Anon' while wearing only assless chaps, a ball gag, a colostomy bag
with one hand up his crapper:
A photo of GREG HALL as a teenage evengelist here:
http://sextoys4gaymen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Deluxe-Ball-Gag-with-Dong.jpg
A photo of Greg Hall after waxing his arse
http://bayimg.com/aAogbAadF
--------
GREG Hall has been systematically banned from at least a dozen news service
providers for net abuse and moronic behavior making him the laughing
stock spanktoy among the admins in alt.free.newsservers. He has a paranoid
fear of his IP number being recorded (it has been by at least 4 free news
admins) hoping to avoid his impending lawsuits for libel, stalking and
online harassment. Gregory Hall is terrified to try and log back in to
servers he's banned from using under his many sock puppet identities
fearing the sharing of those identities by admins.
GREG HALL is single, unmarried and without children because he has been
impotent and sterile all his life. Unable to socialize with women, he has
made it public on hundreds of occasions that he prefers to physically beat
women that threaten or ridicule him on Usenet. He resides penniless in a
Florida rooming house - the apple falls close to the tree.
A recent quote from GREG HALL regarding women:
"I find the smell of vagina gut-wrenching"
-----
GREG HALL claims to live on a 28' yellow fiberglass sailboat moored in
Tavernier Florida
greg...@gmail.com
Neal D. Warren/Gregory Hall
PO Box 1015
Tavernier, FL 33070
305 304-7546
-----
Some of the lonely moronic gay lames forgeries from the allbasani tor
node until his IP got caught and banned:
"I'm into scat, donkey blowing, kiddie diddling, Emmett Gulley's fecal
droppings, and Greg Hanson's penis"
"Big thick dripping donkeyspooge pancakes, swimming in store-bought maple
'surple', with a nice thin film of glazed, sugared donkeyspooge on top."
"Mmmmmm-mmmmm! Ol' Greg Hall surely does love his donkeyspooge pancakes!
Yessir, I surely do. Partly because I loves me some donkeyspooge, and partly
because I can slurp them up without my teeth in! I'm into scat, donkey
blowing, kiddie diddling, Emmett Gulley's fecal
droppings, and Greg Hanson's penis
<SLLEOOORRRRPRPEEEEPPOOUURRRRPPP!!!!> "
"When I'm done eating those big thick dripping donkeyspooge pancakes, I have
to wipe my entire face clean. I'm a messy eater, ol' Gregory is."
"But that's not all you can do with donkeyspooge, nosir! Why, donkeyspooge
oatmeal is the creamiest oatmeal you've ever tasted, and donkeyspooge
scrambled eggs are so fluffy I can eat a dozen eggs' worth! Donkeyspooge
orange juice... protein and vitamin C! Donkeyspooge hashbrowns, they brown
beautifully without getting crunchy."
"Why, there's not a thing that ol' Gregory Hall will eat if it's not got
donkeyspooge in it, and that includes Emmett's back door!
I know i know you all think I'm a sick pervert "
-----
"Unfortunately again, this exertion caused me to sweat,
and when I finally reached my room, my cheeks were
sliding back and forth against each other like a pair
of horny cane-toads. I quickly dropped my pants, and
attempted to dry my ass off by sticking it in front of
a fan and spreading my cheeks. As I pulled the two
mounds of flesh apart, a horrible stench burst free
and filled the room. Every dog within a 4 block radius
started to howl. I had it worst of all, as the ripe
aroma of festering shit/sweat went into the fan and
spread and dripping, with the concentrated aroma of my
body odor mixed with the tangy smell of my own shit
blowing right into my face wiping my ass at every opportunity
two pink twins can get vacuum sealed together, and the
result was a frustrating fart that slid up and down
between my cheeks like a lost gerbil."
hey! --Sir Gregory Hall
Greegor
May 12, 2012, 1:09:30 AM5/12/12
to
Hi Moe!
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Greegor
May 15, 2012, 9:49:05 AM5/15/12
to
KBW > the last few days while he was on a
KBW > 72 hour psychiatric hold, he quickly
KBW > ceases to be a topic of discussion.
KBW > This upsets Greg since he craves attention.
Which 72 hours are you claiming I didn't post, Kent?
I see the post you are responding to was 6 days old.
Below you responded to a post that was 3 days old.
Are you trying in your own way to
explain something about yourself, Kent?
Message has been deleted
Jazzy Belle
May 16, 2012, 7:29:30 PM5/16/12
to
Moe
Greegor
May 17, 2012, 2:37:31 PM5/17/12
to
Kent thinks I am his one and only detractor.
Fred Hall
May 17, 2012, 2:43:34 PM5/17/12
to
On Thu, 17 May 2012 11:37:31 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
wrote in
<8653b2c5-f3b2-4a0c...@ec4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>:
> I am
You are a founded child abuser.
--
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/2012/05/may-2012-nominations.html
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/p/award-winners-1994-2012.html
http://fnvw.databasix.com (awards descriptions and more)
wrote in
<8653b2c5-f3b2-4a0c...@ec4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>:
> I am
You are a founded child abuser.
--
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/2012/05/may-2012-nominations.html
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/p/award-winners-1994-2012.html
http://fnvw.databasix.com (awards descriptions and more)
Greegor
May 17, 2012, 4:22:12 PM5/17/12
to
Please deny your stated reasons for stalking
and harassing that one eBay seller for 10 years, Moe!
Kent seems to be a bit confused about that.
and harassing that one eBay seller for 10 years, Moe!
Kent seems to be a bit confused about that.
Greegor
May 17, 2012, 4:24:48 PM5/17/12
to
> You are a founded child abuser.
Post my Social Services registry listing, Gary!
I am not a sex offender and have never been
ordered to register as a sex offender, Gary Lee.
Jazzy Belle
May 17, 2012, 9:17:59 PM5/17/12
to
This subject has been dealt with in detail years ago, and you damn
well know it. You Aspergers is such that you have to repeat the same
old claims again and again, even though you know you are distorting
and outright lying every time.
As for stalking and harassing, pot, kettle, hypocrite. The good thing
is you are so lousy at your cyber stalking that you get it wrong most
of the time but you as usual for you don't want to admit it to your
targets of obsession.
You are boringly predictable, gaggie.
Moe
Greegor
May 17, 2012, 10:46:46 PM5/17/12
to
You didn't resolve the issue for Kent, Maureen.
Are you going to keep Mum while he lies FOR YOU?
You got an eBay refund didn't you Maureen?
And you stalked and harassed Glen for TEN YEARS after that.
Please don't let Kent take the fall for your dishonesty about this.
Remember, Moe, you can't delete replies
that quoted you, from the archive.
Are you going to keep Mum while he lies FOR YOU?
You got an eBay refund didn't you Maureen?
And you stalked and harassed Glen for TEN YEARS after that.
Please don't let Kent take the fall for your dishonesty about this.
Remember, Moe, you can't delete replies
that quoted you, from the archive.
Greegor
May 18, 2012, 1:53:23 AM5/18/12
to
On May 17, 10:56 pm, This account has been banned because it violated
the Google Groups
> [...] 'bit some rot' isn't Rock Hard Stupid's sock.
> If you examine the headers, you'll know why.
Moe will be offended to learn that I am not
her one ond only detractor.
Got some Fregoli there, Maureen?
the Google Groups
> [...] 'bit some rot' isn't Rock Hard Stupid's sock.
> If you examine the headers, you'll know why.
Moe will be offended to learn that I am not
her one ond only detractor.
Got some Fregoli there, Maureen?
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Greegor
May 18, 2012, 1:44:07 PM5/18/12
to
Hi Kent!
%
May 18, 2012, 1:44:48 PM5/18/12
to
Greegor wrote:
> Hi Kent!
yay , kent
> Hi Kent!
yay , kent
Greegor
May 18, 2012, 2:42:54 PM5/18/12
to
Kent responds to "Hi Kent!" posts with pages of screed. LOL
Fred Hall
May 18, 2012, 2:58:52 PM5/18/12
to
On Fri, 18 May 2012 11:42:54 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
<0269deeb-dc18-457c...@pa10g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>:
>pages of screed
What's your excuse, waterboarder?
<0269deeb-dc18-457c...@pa10g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>:
>pages of screed
What's your excuse, waterboarder?
%
May 18, 2012, 3:06:55 PM5/18/12
to
Fred Hall wrote:
> On Fri, 18 May 2012 11:42:54 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
> <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
> <0269deeb-dc18-457c...@pa10g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>:
>
>> pages of screed
>
> What's your excuse, waterboarder?
look at fred hall stealing my word
> On Fri, 18 May 2012 11:42:54 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
> <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
> <0269deeb-dc18-457c...@pa10g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>:
>
>> pages of screed
>
> What's your excuse, waterboarder?
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Greegor
May 19, 2012, 9:47:10 AM5/19/12
to
Kent is so very Pavlovian.
Message has been deleted
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages