Contact the Distric Attorney's office where you were convicted,
ask them if State Statute allows for expungement or sealing of
convictions (doubtful), and if it does, would they be opposed to
your application.
Your only other alternative is a Pardon, either Governor's or Presidential.
You'll need even more $$ payola for one of those.
Complete BULLSHIT!
Why do you post such absurd lies ?
The president has no authority to pardon people convicted of state
crimes. Presidents can only pardon federal convicts.
Complete BULLSHIT!
Wow. Such an eloquent and well-supported rebuttal. Lemme guess: head of
the debate team in school?
Care to provide any legal citation whatsoever for your claim? Failing
that, just one instance of a president pardoning a state convict at some
point in the 200+ year history of the nation will do.
Betcha can't.
U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 2:
The President shall... have power to grant reprieves
and pardons for offenses against the United States,
except in cases of impeachment.
You'll note that it says nothing about offenses against the various
individual states.
And then there's Wikipedia, which I'm sure you'll disparage in a
desperate and futile effort to save face, but which is nevertheless
entirely accurate in this case:
The pardon power of the President extends only to
offenses cognizable under U.S. Federal law. However,
the governors of most states have the power to grant
pardons or reprieves for offenses under state criminal
law. In other states, that power is committed to an
appointed agency or board, or to a board and the governor
in some hybrid arrangement.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_pardon#Pardons_and_clemency_in_
the_United_States
You're still wrong.
>
> Care to provide any legal citation whatsoever for your claim? Failing
> that, just one instance of a president pardoning a state convict at
> some point in the 200+ year history of the nation will do.
>
> Betcha can't.
In addition to Federal Offenses, the President's pardon power extends to
convictions obtained in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia and
Military Court-Martial proceedings.
In addition to Federal Offenses, the President's pardon power extends to
You apparently don't know better than to quit when you're behind.
> > Care to provide any legal citation whatsoever for your claim? Failing
> > that, just one instance of a president pardoning a state convict at
> > some point in the 200+ year history of the nation will do.
> >
> > Betcha can't.
>
> In addition to Federal Offenses, the President's pardon power extends to
> convictions obtained in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia and
> Military Court-Martial proceedings.
What does that have to do with state law? Nothing.
Your straw man, you dance with him.
Keep dancing.
Ah, so this is how you're going to try and avoid your latest abject
embarrassment.
(1) You flat out told the original poster that one of his options for a
violation of state law was a presidential pardon.
(2) When the inaccuracy of that statement was pointed out to you, you're
response was (and I quote), "Complete BULLSHIT!"
(3) When you failed to provide even one instance of *any* president in
U.S. history *ever* pardoning a state convict and when legal citations
were provided showing you the limitation on the presidential pardon
power to federal law, you then tried to confuse the issue by throwing
out military courts-martial and pardons in Washington, DC.
(4) And finally, when it was pointed out to you that both those things
are also matters of federal law, not state law, you suddenly just
declared the whole thing a "strawman".
One can only conclude that either you are woefully ignorant of the true
definition of the term "strawman" or you're so full of shit, your eyes
are brown.
I'm betting on the latter.
[I could take a page from your book here and start accusing you of
lying, since that's what you do whenever anyone else misstates the law.
Of course I'm sure you have some convenient rationalization as to why
your own standards don't apply to you.]
This is all you've got?
You lied when you said presidents can pardon state convicts.
You got caught.
Why do you keep lying?
>In article <63occfF...@mid.individual.net>,
> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <the...@jonez.net> wrote:
<snipped No one cares>
>
>One can only conclude that either you are woefully ignorant of the true
>definition of the term "strawman" or you're so full of shit, your eyes
>are brown.
>
>I'm betting on the latter.
>
You are attempting to communicate with a clueless blithering idiot.
It is impossible for him to understand anything you might post. He
simply does not have the intelligence required to respond to you in
any known rational manner.
Mike Smith
That does appear to be the case.
You're lying again. Keep dancing with your straw man, jackass.
You're lying again.
YOU: Your only other alternative is a Pardon, either Governor's or
Presidential.
QED
Exactly.
>
> QED
Ibid.
Exactly.
>
> QED
Ibid.
This is a new strategy for you: playing a complete retard who doesn't
understand what's going on. Or maybe it's just the real you coming out.
Who knows?
Either way, you and I both know that you got caught being dead wrong
about the law in the same thread where you called someone else a moron
for a similar mistake and this is just your lame attempt to save face.
So keep playing the drooling idiot if you think it'll help but you're
fooling no one.
Why do you lie?
>
> So keep playing the drooling idiot if you think it'll help but you're
> fooling no one.
If you say so.
YOU: Your only other alternative is a Pardon, either Governor's or
Presidential.
Correct.
You're lying again. Keep dancing with your straw man, jackass.
YOU: Your only other alternative is a Pardon, either Governor's or
Presidential.
YOU: Your only other alternative is a Pardon, either Governor's or
Presidential.
Correct.
Correct.
Wrong.
Correct.
No, it's not.
No, it isn't.
>
> YOU: Your only other alternative is a Pardon, either Governor's or
> Presidential.
Exactly.
> > YOU: Your only other alternative is a Pardon, either Governor's or
> > Presidential.
>
> Exactly.
And it's wrong.
> > And it's wrong.
> > YOU: Your only other alternative is a Pardon, either Governor's or
> > Presidential.
>
> Correct.
And it's wrong.
You're wrong yet again, asswipe.
You're wrong yet again, jackass.
Yep, you are. Glad we agree.
> > YOU: Your only other alternative is a Pardon, either Governor's or
Not a lie since you're wrong.
> > YOU: Your only other alternative is a Pardon, either Governor's or
> > Presidential.
>
You're wrong once again, moron.
>
>>> YOU: Your only other alternative is a Pardon, either Governor's or
>>> Presidential.
>>
>> Correct.
>
> YOU: Your only other alternative is a Pardon, either Governor's or
> Presidential.
Correct.
Why do you lie so much?
>
>>> YOU: Your only other alternative is a Pardon, either Governor's or
>>> Presidential.
>>
>> Correct.
>
> YOU: Your only other alternative is a Pardon, either Governor's or
> Presidential.
Correct.
You're lying again, moron.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The president has no authority to pardon people
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> convicted of state crimes.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Complete BULLSHIT!
>> >
>> > YOU: Your only other alternative is a Pardon, either Governor's or
>> > Presidential.
>>
>> Correct.
>
>And it's wrong.
>
>YOU: Your only other alternative is a Pardon, either Governor's or
>> Presidential.
Do you think he will ever understand the difference between a
Governor's pardon and the President's pardon? Do you think he will
ever read the Constitution to see what a President CAN pardon?
Not likely, the prof is pretty stupid.
Mike Smith
Yep. It's pretty much an idiot.
Why do you lie?