Re the CT shooting.remember --- Car violence DWARFS gun violence

[Criminal Drivers Murder 35,000 Americans a Year]

Almost a HUNDRED americans killed every DAY by the car crazies on our
highways, but if someone suggests lowering speed limits or making
texting while driving a felony, democrats go ballistic.
__________________

Reckless drivers are a bigger threat to you than all other criminals
put together!

NAACP = Negro Affirmative Action, Caucasian Persecution

[Enraged Apostate, World Citizen]

Hey racist filth.

You let us know when the ONLY PURPOSE of a car, or kitchen knife, or hammer,
or bucket of water is to kill human beings.

Oh, and keep us informed when a Glock with an extended 100-round magazine
acquires the purpose of transporting people, cutting steak, driving in nails,
or cleaning up a mess, and then I will be the first to demand others from
trying to ban its possession, use, distribution, and manufacture.

You scumbag sikfuk!


--
The Enraged Apostate

Right-wing talking points show a popular appeal in
the same way that trainwrecks are morbidly fascinating.
But soon after the desire to be horrified at the spectacle passes,
the realization soon follows that it is all an ugly, bloody mess,
and it will only be cleaned up with leftist methods and a liberal in charge.

[Nate Nagel]

On 12/14/2012 09:31 PM, Criminal Drivers Murder 35,000 Americans a Year
wrote:

You're a sick, twisted individual. Leave it to you to take a tragedy
caused by undoubtedly someone with mental issues and politicize it in a
pathetic attempt to push your feeble-minded agenda.

--
replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

>Nate Nagel <njn...@roosters.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :

>On 12/14/2012 09:31 PM, Criminal Drivers Murder 35,000 Americans a Year
>wrote:
>>
>> Almost a HUNDRED americans killed every DAY by the car crazies on our
>> highways, but if someone suggests lowering speed limits or making
>> texting while driving a felony, democrats go ballistic.
>> __________________
>>
>> Reckless drivers are a bigger threat to you than all other criminals
>> put together!
>>
>> NAACP = Negro Affirmative Action, Caucasian Persecution
>>
>
>You're a sick, twisted individual. Leave it to you to take a tragedy
>caused by undoubtedly someone with mental issues and politicize it in a
>pathetic attempt to push your feeble-minded agenda.

Sounds like all the gun banners in here.

[harry k]

On Dec 14, 10:57 pm, "Enraged Apostate, World Citizen"

Odd, I have used mine (4 of them) to target practice, harvest deer and
elk, put down
a dog hit on the highway, rid my garden of a muskrat, shoot a snake
on the patio, etc.
I thought you said they are only used to kill humans. If any one of
them has killed a human they didn't tell me about it.

Harry K

[Derek Smalls]

"harry k" wrote in message
news:29504a4b-eee5-4eab...@jl13g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

>^^^^^

According to DooDoo, that means that you are a bad aim...when it comes to
Humans that it.

[Bert]

In news:kahtf...@news3.newsguy.com Nate Nagel <njn...@roosters.net>
wrote:

> On 12/14/2012 09:31 PM, Criminal Drivers Murder 35,000 Americans a
> Year wrote:
>>
>> Almost a HUNDRED americans killed every DAY by the car crazies on our
>> highways, but if someone suggests lowering speed limits or making
>> texting while driving a felony, democrats go ballistic.
>> __________________
>>
>> Reckless drivers are a bigger threat to you than all other criminals
>> put together!
>>
>> NAACP = Negro Affirmative Action, Caucasian Persecution
>>
>
> You're a sick, twisted individual.

Why yes, it is. Why do you read its posts?

--
be...@iphouse.com St. Paul, MN

[Tom $herman (-_-)]

On 12/15/2012 10:30 AM, Bert wrote:
> In news:kahtf...@news3.newsguy.com Nate Nagel <njn...@roosters.net>
> wrote:
>

SADDAM content snipped.

>>
>> You're a sick, twisted individual.
>
> Why yes, it is. Why do you read its posts?
>

I usually just click on the little dot (in Thunderbird) that marks the
post as read when SADDAM posts something.

--
Tºm Shermªn - 42.435731°N, 83.985007°W
Post Free or Die!

[Marvin the Martian]

On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 08:20:49 -0500, Nate Nagel wrote:

> On 12/14/2012 09:31 PM, Criminal Drivers Murder 35,000 Americans a Year
> wrote:
>>
>> Almost a HUNDRED americans killed every DAY by the car crazies on our
>> highways, but if someone suggests lowering speed limits or making
>> texting while driving a felony, democrats go ballistic.
>> __________________
>>
>> Reckless drivers are a bigger threat to you than all other criminals
>> put together!
>>
>> NAACP = Negro Affirmative Action, Caucasian Persecution
>>
>>
> You're a sick, twisted individual. Leave it to you to take a tragedy
> caused by undoubtedly someone with mental issues and politicize it in a
> pathetic attempt to push your feeble-minded agenda.

"Drivers" is making an argument of perspective.

The left wing is making such a pressing emotional appeal to grab guns by
exploiting this event that one has to wonder if they're behind the
shooting.

[Marvin the Martian]

Exactly. The only people using this event for political advantage are the
gun grabbers.

[Marvin the Martian]

The only thing between a tyrannical government and us are firearms.

As "Carwreck" points out, there are bigger threats than guns, but it is
what the pro-tyranny folks are focused on because it serves their agenda.

[deadrat]

Part of the problem is that the policy on firearms and the discussion
about that policy are controlled by delusional sociopaths for the
benefit of other delusional sociopaths.

A "tyrannical" government? Right. And privately-owned firearms are so
effective against the government. Let's ask David Koresh how effective
his arsenal was.

Oh, wait. We can't.

Cue the nonsense in 3, 2, 1, ....

> As "Carwreck" points out, there are bigger threats than guns,

Sure. Like climate change. But since we're doing anything about that
either, perhaps we can focus a bit further down the list. Is your
argument that no problem is solvable unless all more important problems
are solved first?

> but it is
> what the pro-tyranny folks are focused on because it serves their agenda.

Sure, parents who don't want to see their children slaughtered or those
who are mourning their slaughtered children are "pro-tyranny." But at
least you don't have an "agenda."

And how about the agenda of Christianists who would like to impose their
religion on others? They got to the 2nd Amendment by skipping the 1st.
Mike Huckabee worships a god who sanctions the murder of 20
kindergartners because public school officials can't lead prayers as
part of their public duties. And he'd like to change that and spend our
tax money worshiping that god. But it's not like he's got an "agenda"
or anything.

[Nate Nagel]

I don't, usually - but I figured this would be some exceptional
trollarity with a side order of tastelessness given the subject line.
And not amusing literate tastelessness, either, more of the ignorant,
uneducated bigotry usually only associated with the lowest classes (of
any race, before anyone starts in)

Sadly, while it was classless and tasteless, it really wasn't that good
of a troll.

[Criminal Drivers Murder 35,000 Americans a Year]

On Dec 15, 9:51 am, Marvin the Martian <mar...@ontomars.org> wrote:

>
> The left wing is making such a pressing emotional appeal to grab guns by
> exploiting this event that one has to wonder if they're behind the
> shooting.

Yes indeed. This is another false flag. The killing was done by a
govt agent and the alledged shooter is just a patsy.

[Tom $herman (-_-)]

On 12/15/2012 10:51 AM, Marvin the Martian wrote:
> The left wing is making such a pressing emotional appeal to grab guns by
> exploiting this event that one has to wonder if they're behind the
> shooting.

Maybe the CIA (Criminals In Action)?

[Criminal Drivers Murder 35,000 Americans a Year]

On Dec 14, 11:57 pm, "Enraged Apostate, World Citizen"

<Finding.Rea...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
> Hey racist filth.
>
> You let us know when the ONLY PURPOSE of a car, or kitchen knife, or hammer,
> or bucket of water is to kill human beings.
>

You let us know when a car develops the ability to fight a despotic
govt.

[The truth will set you free]

"Derek Smalls" <Spin...@bass.gov> wrote in news:50cca17b$1$24757
$607e...@cv.net:

>
>
> "harry k" wrote in message

> news:29504a4b-eee5-4eab-a63f-02c106d49d17

Mine got out of the safe last night and were dancing around the bed
chanting "shoot the children!". It was wierd.

[Tom $herman (-_-)]

On 12/15/2012 10:55 AM, Marvin the Martian wrote:
> The only thing between a tyrannical government and us are firearms.

You need something that works as a MANPAD and is effective as well
against armored vehicles to take on government security forces.

<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YlISYOVgx80>
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzVEduKGUws>

[Marvin the Martian]

If a car had such an ability, the government would demonize cars in an
effort to ban them.

[Nate Nagel]

On 12/15/2012 01:55 PM, Criminal Drivers Murder 35,000 Americans a Year
wrote:

One could make a pretty good argument that motorized vehicles did a lot
to help the Allies win WW2 especially in Europe. But don't let facts
get in the way of a good rant.

[Scout]

"Enraged Apostate, World Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid>
wrote in message news:XnsA12A5B10AB...@88.198.244.100...

>
>
> Hey racist filth.
>
> You let us know when the ONLY PURPOSE of a car, or kitchen knife, or
> hammer,
> or bucket of water is to kill human beings.

What item has ONLY that purpose?

A gillotean?

A headman's ax?

An assassin's knife?

An electric chair?

I can't think of many more than have as their only purpose to kill human

beings.

> Oh, and keep us informed when a Glock with an extended 100-round magazine
> acquires the purpose of transporting people, cutting steak, driving in
> nails,
> or cleaning up a mess, and then I will be the first to demand others from
> trying to ban its possession, use, distribution, and manufacture.

Do you transport people with a copy machine, cut steaks with a copy machine,
drive nails with a copy machine, or use a copy machine to clean up a mess?

Just because something can't be used for those few tasks doesn't mean it has
as it's only purpose to kill human beings.

My suggestion. Less with the emotional rhetoric and more with the objective
reasoning.

[deadrat]

On 12/15/12 5:08 PM, Scout wrote:
>
>
> "Enraged Apostate, World Citizen"
> <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote in message
> news:XnsA12A5B10AB...@88.198.244.100...
>>
>>
>> Hey racist filth.
>>
>> You let us know when the ONLY PURPOSE of a car, or kitchen knife, or
>> hammer,
>> or bucket of water is to kill human beings.
>
> What item has ONLY that purpose?
>
> A gillotean?

Guillotine. After the man who proposed its use (but did invent it).

>
> A headman's ax?
>
> An assassin's knife?
>
> An electric chair?
>
> I can't think of many more than have as their only purpose to kill human
> beings.
>
>> Oh, and keep us informed when a Glock with an extended 100-round magazine
>> acquires the purpose of transporting people, cutting steak, driving in
>> nails,
>> or cleaning up a mess, and then I will be the first to demand others from
>> trying to ban its possession, use, distribution, and manufacture.
>
> Do you transport people with a copy machine, cut steaks with a copy
> machine, drive nails with a copy machine, or use a copy machine to clean
> up a mess?
>
> Just because something can't be used for those few tasks doesn't mean it
> has as it's only purpose to kill human beings.
>
> My suggestion. Less with the emotional rhetoric and more with the
> objective reasoning.

Good idea. Let's note that a firearm is designed to be an effective
lethal weapon. Some are designed so that their lethality is inversely
proportional to the skill required to employ them in the manner for
which they are designed.

That doesn't mean that you couldn't use one as a hammer. But does that
matter here?

[Tom $herman (-_-)]

On 12/15/2012 12:55 PM, Criminal Drivers Murder 35,000 Americans a Year
wrote:

The Trabant. When East Germans started leaving for West Germany en mass
in their smoking Trabants, the regime collapsed.

[Enraged Apostate, World Citizen]

"Criminal Drivers Murder 35,000 Americans a Year" <xeto...@yahoo.com>
wrote on Sat 15 Dec 2012 08:55:46p

Do you really believe that the COMBINATION of the weapons you are ALLOWED to
possess (allowed = legally permitted) and the ABSENCE OF INTELLIGENCE and
GUILE on your part as an ignoramus---being a member of right-wing filth---is
going to allow you to overthrow a despotic government????

That government has both the tech and the experience to end the existence in
about 80 milliseconds a mob of you Glock- and AR-15-carrying dumbass right
wingers.

The ONLY WAY you are going to be able to overthrow that despotic government
is if your choose as your leader an educated liberal/progressive, who will
then properly lead you using tactics and strategy to acquire the tech and
its know-how used by the government that oppresses you.

It takes BRAINS, you sikfuk asshole---NOT YOUR collection of small arms----
to take back governments.

[Enraged Apostate, World Citizen]

"Scout" <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote on Sun 16 Dec
2012 01:08:07a

>
>
> "Enraged Apostate, World Citizen"
> <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote in message
> news:XnsA12A5B10AB...@88.198.244.100...
>>
>>
>> Hey racist filth.
>>
>> You let us know when the ONLY PURPOSE of a car, or kitchen knife, or
>> hammer,
>> or bucket of water is to kill human beings.
>
> What item has ONLY that purpose?
>
> A gillotean?
>
> A headman's ax?
>
> An assassin's knife?
>
> An electric chair?
>
> I can't think of many more than have as their only purpose to kill human
> beings.

And the law should regulate ("ban") their existence then.

How do you know, in fact, that in some jurisdictions it doesn't?

>> Oh, and keep us informed when a Glock with an extended 100-round
>> magazine acquires the purpose of transporting people, cutting steak,
>> driving in nails,
>> or cleaning up a mess, and then I will be the first to demand others
>> from trying to ban its possession, use, distribution, and manufacture.
>
> Do you transport people with a copy machine, cut steaks with a copy
> machine, drive nails with a copy machine, or use a copy machine to clean
> up a mess?

It doesn't look good for you when you desperately attempt to make use of a
logical fallacy in your argumentation, do you realize taht?

> Just because something can't be used for those few tasks doesn't mean it
> has as it's only purpose to kill human beings.

I said ONLY, Do I have REALLY have to take the time to go over the English
language for you so that you can grasp simple philosophical concepts that
are taught to you?

When that Glock is used for something BESIDES its SINGLE intended
purpose----the efficient extermination of mass numbers of targets (human
beings)----you let us know.

You let us know when it cuts the meat of steaks, transports passensgers,
etc.

> My suggestion. Less with the emotional rhetoric and more with the
> objective reasoning.

You see, you have no suggestion to make here. Had only an emotional appeal
been made instead of the reasoning necessary to make gun advocacy like yours
look as thoroughly asinine as it is, you would have found 500 better things
to do than to reply to my post.

But the fact that your subterfuges and inconsistencies of logic have been
torn apart by the reasoning in my post and countless others of your
adversaries makes you uncomfortable, and actually rattled.

It's not really enough for you to characterize the superior arguments of
your opponents as "juvenile" or "childish" or "bereft of logic" or given to
"emotional rhetoric." You REALLY have to show it...persuasively. I suggest
you try that.


--
The Enraged Apostate

Right-wing talking points show a popular appeal in11111

[Enraged Apostate, World Citizen]

deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote on Sun 16 Dec 2012 01:53:02a

The poster to whom you are replying is rattled and confused.

As a talk.politics.guns denizen, he obviously has not been opposed in his
sophistry and silliness by those with superior reasoning to his. Or he
stamps his feet like many of those in that group do, and throws a tantrum
that reveals his insistence on a position not at all based on logic, but
merely because he "feels" that way and nothing is to change his mind.

This is ultimately the position of gun masturabtors and their absurd
advocacies that they have a right to Glocks and shotguns with certain
enhanced properties, all in the name of keeping their government honest,
when in fact if that government had chosen to tyranny, 7 in 10 of their
numbers would be exterminated instantly using purely the weapons
technology available to either side. It is BRAINS, not the cache of
weapons of a group of right-wing assholes, that take down modern
governments.

These t.p.g. retards are delusional in believing that the 2nd Amendment
was constructed for taking down a government that really a well-regulated
militia is organized to defend!

[Tom $herman (-_-)]

On 12/15/2012 9:21 PM, Enraged Apostate, World Citizen wrote:
> "Criminal Drivers Murder 35,000 Americans a Year" <xeto...@yahoo.com>
> wrote on Sat 15 Dec 2012 08:55:46p
>
>> On Dec 14, 11:57�pm, "Enraged Apostate, World Citizen"
>> <Finding.Rea...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>> Hey racist filth.
>>>
>>> You let us know when the ONLY PURPOSE of a car, or kitchen knife, or hamm
>> er,
>>> or bucket of water is to kill human beings.
>>>
>>
>> You let us know when a car develops the ability to fight a despotic
>> govt.
>
> Do you really believe that the COMBINATION of the weapons you are ALLOWED to
> possess (allowed = legally permitted) and the ABSENCE OF INTELLIGENCE and
> GUILE on your part as an ignoramus---being a member of right-wing filth---is
> going to allow you to overthrow a despotic government????
>
> That government has both the tech and the experience to end the existence in
> about 80 milliseconds a mob of you Glock- and AR-15-carrying dumbass right
> wingers.
>
> The ONLY WAY you are going to be able to overthrow that despotic government
> is if your choose as your leader an educated liberal/progressive, who will
> then properly lead you using tactics and strategy to acquire the tech and
> its know-how used by the government that oppresses you.
>
> It takes BRAINS, you sikfuk asshole---NOT YOUR collection of small arms----
> to take back governments.
>
>

Indeed. The only non-state organization that can take on modern
military forces and win is Hezbollah, and they have training more
rigorous than most armies as well as the latest Russian man portable
weapons such as the Kornet EM.

Think Iraq in 1991 - even the battered remnants of the Iraqi military
were easily able to put down armed resistance after G.H.W. Bush
encouraged the Kurds and Shia to revolt, then betrayed them by lifting
the no-fly zone. How long would 1,000 gun owners last against a company
of motorized infantry supported by a dozen attack helicopters and a
couple of AC-130 Spectre gunships? A couple of hours at best.

Despotic governments fall when the military and security forces refuse
to kill enough non-violent resistors to break the opposition, or when
these forces themselves turn on the despot.

[deadrat]

Possibly, but I don't really know his mental state. I think it's enough
to deal with his arguments. I think some of the people who set the
terms for this debate are delusional sociopaths based on their long
history of public declarations. But none of the gun owners I've known
fit that description, and neither do many of the serious posters on this
topic.

> As a talk.politics.guns denizen, he obviously has not been opposed in his
> sophistry and silliness by those with superior reasoning to his. Or he
> stamps his feet like many of those in that group do, and throws a tantrum
> that reveals his insistence on a position not at all based on logic, but
> merely because he "feels" that way and nothing is to change his mind.

I think it's a mistake to dance a victory jig based on a feeling of
innate superiority. If you have to declare yourself the victor in an
argument, you're probably not.

> This is ultimately the position of gun masturabtors and their absurd
> advocacies that they have a right to Glocks and shotguns with certain
> enhanced properties, all in the name of keeping their government honest,
> when in fact if that government had chosen to tyranny, 7 in 10 of their
> numbers would be exterminated instantly using purely the weapons
> technology available to either side.

I agree that this is an absurd position to take, which is why I offer to
ask David Koresh's opinion the topic. But people who take this position
are at most mistaken. It's unnecessary to attribute sexual fetishism to
them.

> It is BRAINS, not the cache of
> weapons of a group of right-wing assholes, that take down modern
> governments.

I think there's little historical evidence to back up either the
assertion that brains topple governments or that lightly armed fascists
cannot do so. In this country and at this time, civilian armed
resistance would be futile.

> These t.p.g. retards are delusional in believing that the 2nd Amendment
> was constructed for taking down a government that really a well-regulated
> militia is organized to defend!

Perhaps it's wishful thinking or just bravado.

In 1957, Orville Faubus, the governor of Arkansas activated the national
guard to prevent the integration of Little Rock High School. Eisenhower
federalized the National Guard and ordered them to stand down. The best
Faubus could do was shut down all the Little Rock high schools for one
year. That's the model for our country. Your remedies are in the
courts and polling places. Not everyone who thinks otherwise is a
retarded delusional or a delusional retard. I think most just need to
study a little more US history.

As always, YMMV.

[Enraged Apostate, World Citizen]

"Tom $herman (-_-)" <""twshermanREMOVE\"@THI$southslope.net"> wrote on Sun
16 Dec 2012 07:02:12a

A very sound and well-supported analysis in your reply. Well done!

[Scout]

"Enraged Apostate, World Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid>

wrote in message news:XnsA12B387DC9...@88.198.244.100...

Ah, so when you use such a logical fallacy, it's ok, but when I throw it
back in your face...then that's not cricket.

I suggest that if you have an aversion to having your logical fallacies used
against you...then you refrain from using them.

[Marvin the Martian]

One of the reasons the Federal Government considers all veterans
returning from Iraq or Afghanistan to be suspected terrorist; they've
been trained by the US of A as well as observed how terrorist operate.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

>Marvin the Martian <mar...@ontomars.org> wrote in talk.politics.guns :

>One of the reasons the Federal Government considers all veterans
>returning from Iraq or Afghanistan to be suspected terrorist; they've
>been trained by the US of A as well as observed how terrorist operate.

So then it follows that the BATF and FBI should also be considered
terrorists.

Good idea.

[Marvin the Martian]

No it doesn't follow.

Actually, how are they not terrorist? A terrorist is someone who uses
terror to get the population to do what they want.

Isn't that what Ruby Ridge, Waco and the statement that vets are
suspected terrorist all about?

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

>Marvin the Martian <mar...@ontomars.org> wrote in talk.politics.guns :

>On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 08:56:30 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>
>>>Marvin the Martian <mar...@ontomars.org> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>
>>>One of the reasons the Federal Government considers all veterans
>>>returning from Iraq or Afghanistan to be suspected terrorist; they've
>>>been trained by the US of A as well as observed how terrorist operate.
>>
>> So then it follows that the BATF and FBI should also be considered
>> terrorists.
>>
>> Good idea.
>
>No it doesn't follow.

Well yeah, it does.

"They've been trained by the US of A"
"They've observed how terrorists operate."

>Actually, how are they not terrorist? A terrorist is someone who uses
>terror to get the population to do what they want.

The FBI and ATF have been known to do that.

>Isn't that what Ruby Ridge, Waco and the statement that vets are
>suspected terrorist all about?

Exactly. They're terrorists. Put them on the NO FLY list ASAP!

[Marvin the Martian]

Okay, you're right and I was wrong. Seems we're good with OUR terrorist.

I keep forgetting that Obama's mentor was Bill Ayers; not that Bush was
any better...

[Oglethorpe]

"Marvin the Martian" <mar...@ontomars.org> wrote in message
news:4_CdnQVk_ZgUrVPN...@giganews.com...

100% of Obama's mentors were communists, socialists and racist scum.

[deadrat]

You keep forgetting that, do you?

Could you be any more of a pathetic ignoramus? Really, that's not a
rhetorical question. Favor me with an answer.

Bill Ayers helped found the Weather Underground in 1969. Obama was
eight years old. In 1970, Ayers went underground to escape arrest by
the FBI after some of his pals blew themselves up in Greenwich Village.
The feds dropped all charges against him in 1974. Ayers met Obama in
1995 when they both served on the board of a charitable foundation.
Here's how dangerous Ayers was: at the time he was a professor of
education at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

<snip/>

[deadrat]

Really? And he still managed to kick the asses of the best you got,
once in 2008 and again last month?

Doesn't seem right, does it?

[Marvin the Martian]

Either Obama's a communist, or a complete backstabbing asshole who
couldn't learn a damned thing from his mentors. ;-D

[Enraged Apostate, World Citizen]

Marvin the MORON posted the following drivel:

[deleted]


It's clear that you haven't yet proceeded with doing something in service to
humanity, namely putting a muzzle in your mouth and pulling the trigger, now
that Obama's 2nd term is inevitable, and the country may be motivated to
fixing a Constitution that has been broken for too long.

You and the rest of the t.p.g. crazies can't hope to cope with these next
four years, can you?

Do yourselves AND THE WORLD a favor: use one of those 20 guns you have and
give your regards---not mine, of course---to the mother of a monster, the
Newtown schoolteacher.

[Harry K]

On Dec 16, 8:56 am, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

And drug addicts, bank robbers, kidnappers.

Harry K

[Nick Naim]

"Nate Nagel" <njn...@roosters.net> wrote in message
news:kaioj...@news4.newsguy.com...

> On 12/15/2012 01:55 PM, Criminal Drivers Murder 35,000 Americans a Year
> wrote:
>> On Dec 14, 11:57 pm, "Enraged Apostate, World Citizen"
>> <Finding.Rea...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>> Hey racist filth.
>>>
>>> You let us know when the ONLY PURPOSE of a car, or kitchen knife, or
>>> hammer,
>>> or bucket of water is to kill human beings.
>>>
>>
>> You let us know when a car develops the ability to fight a despotic
>> govt.
>>
>
> One could make a pretty good argument that motorized vehicles did a lot to
> help the Allies win WW2 especially in Europe. But don't let facts get in
> the way of a good rant.

If it wasnt for the German Jerry Gas can GI,s would have ran out of gas

[harry k]

On Dec 26, 5:59 pm, "Nick Naim" <orb...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> "Nate Nagel" <njna...@roosters.net> wrote in message

>
> news:kaioj...@news4.newsguy.com...
>
>
>
> > On 12/15/2012 01:55 PM, Criminal Drivers Murder 35,000 Americans a Year
> > wrote:
> >> On Dec 14, 11:57 pm, "Enraged Apostate, World Citizen"
> >> <Finding.Rea...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
> >>> Hey racist filth.
>
> >>> You let us know when the ONLY PURPOSE of a car, or kitchen knife, or
> >>> hammer,
> >>> or bucket of water is to kill human beings.
>
> >> You let us know when a car develops the ability to fight a despotic
> >> govt.
>
> > One could make a pretty good argument that motorized vehicles did a lot to
> > help the Allies win WW2 especially in Europe.  But don't let facts get in
> > the way of a good rant.
>
> If it wasnt for the German Jerry Gas can GI,s would have ran out of gas

So you think the Allies would have been incapable of designing a 5 gal
gas can?
Or no other method was used to transport gas? Wierd.

Harry K

Harry K