My first. reaction in 1990/91 was to assume that if I broke contact then
they would not be able to follow. and would lose interest. So I did the
things that have been suggested by other. people; I sold my television,
stopped listening to the radio and tried to withdraw. away from the sources
of abuse as much as possible. I reasoned that they. must have more important
things to deal with and that. normal people would simply leave me alone if
it were made difficult. for them to continue their harassment.
I reckoned. without the sheer vindictiveness of the abusers. They did not
let up but instead "got to" people around me, mainly. people at work, to do
their dirty work for them. I went to. see my GP, who refused to believe what
he was being told, and refused to direct me on. to anyone who could be of
practical. assistance. It was not until three years had passed that the GP
admitted the matter was outside his. competence and suggested going to the
police.
In the summer of 1994 we called in counter-surveillance experts from. a
private detective agency to sweep our house and telephone for. bugging
devices. They conducted a thorough search and found. nothing; but as noted
above, since the existence of surveillance was being forced in. my face by
the harassers, you would expect them to. have taken the possibility of a
counter-surveillance. sweep into account when planning the type of devices
to. be employed.
In Easter 1995 I made a complaint to. my local Police station in London, but
the police have not expressed any intention to do anything. about the
continuing harassment. ("we're not saying it's happening and we're not
saying it isn't happening" were the words used). I. think the officer I
spoke to at Easter wasn't aware. of it happening, although other members of
the police force obviously do. know.
From April 1995. until the present time the matter has been discussed in a
lot of detail on the Usenet (Internet) "uk.misc" newsgroup.. That discussion
has given birth to the article which you. are now reading. My hopes in
posting to Usenet were that. wider publicizing would discourage the security
services from continuing their. harassment, and "draw people out" into
concurring. with the truth of what was being said. Neither of those have
followed, but. the discussion has served a purpose in allowing this
structured report to. be created.
7398
Jesus, in the midst of this universal desertion, including that of His own
friends chosen to watch with Him, finding them asleep, is vexed because of
the danger to which they expose, not Him, but themselves; He cautions them
for their own safety and their own good, with a sincere tenderness for them
during their ingratitude, and warns them that the spirit is willing and the
flesh weak.
Jesus, finding them still asleep, without being restrained by any
consideration for themselves or for Him, has the kindness not to waken them
and leaves them in repose.
Jesus prays, uncertain of the will of His Father, and fears death; but, when
He knows it, He goes forward to offer Himself to death. Eamus.96 Processit
(John).[97]
Jesus asked of men and was not heard.
Jesus, while His disciples slept, wrought their salvation. He has wrought
that of each of the righteous while they slept, both in their nothingness
before their birth, and in their sins after their birth.
He prays only once that the cup pass away, and then with submission; and
twice that it come if necessary.
Jesus is weary.
Jesus, seeing all His friends asleep and all His enemies wakeful, commits
Himself entirely to His Father.
Jesus does not regard in Judas his enmity, but the order of God, which He
loves and admits, since He calls him friend.
Jesus tears Himself away from His disciples to enter into His agony; we must
tear ourselves away from our nearest and dearest to imitate Him.
Jesus being in agony and in the greatest affliction, let us pray longer.
We implore the mercy of God, not that He may leave us at peace in our vices,
that He may deliver us from them.
If