Kathy Griffin Seeks Care of CRSQA Certified Refractive Surgeon
Glenn - USAEyes.org
Refractive Surgeon Kerry Assil, MD after untreated epithelial ingrowth
(http://www.usaeyes.org/faq/subjects/ingrowth.htm) cause degradation
of her vision.
Griffin acknowledged in television interviews that she had not
responded to her primary doctors' repeated requests to return for care
until after damage had occurred.
Griffin is expected to make a full vision recovery with treatment and
specialized contact lenses.
Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
USAEyes.org
"Consider and Choose With Confidence"
Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
http://www.USAEyes.org
http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
I am not a doctor.
CatmanX
Good luck to Kerry, who will probably get sued or have a website in
their name started (as per Brent Hanson) for trying to help someone who
is possibly irreparable (although epi ingrowth is treatable, but Brent
will tell you she will go blind).
dr grant
Brent Hanson - LASIKFRAUD.com
recovery with treatment and specialized contact lenses."
1) Hagele has no way of determining if Kathy Griffin is expected to
make a full vision recovery unless Kathy in fact conveyed this
information to Hagele.
2) Dr. Assil does not fit specialized contact lenses -- he is a
refractive surgeon. So apparently Dr. Assil is NOT capable of
repairing damaged caused by Dr. Maloney.
Glenn - USAEyes.org
on his bovine fertilizer. He tries again and again to deflect the
facts and sets loose another red herring.
On 27 Dec 2005 04:49:28 -0800, "Brent Hanson - LASIKFRAUD.com"
<admini...@lasikcourt.com> wrote:
>Glenn Hagele states that "Griffin is expected to make a full vision
>recovery with treatment and specialized contact lenses."
>
>1) Hagele has no way of determining if Kathy Griffin is expected to
>make a full vision recovery unless Kathy in fact conveyed this
>information to Hagele.
Griffin had previously stated in an interview that recovery with
contacts was expected, HOWEVER her personal website now says that her
vision is poor. So things may have changed or her website is not up to
date.
>2) Dr. Assil does not fit specialized contact lenses -- he is a
>refractive surgeon. So apparently Dr. Assil is NOT capable of
>repairing damaged caused by Dr. Maloney.
Not only does Dr. Assil have the ability and talent to fit specialized
lenses, he is also able to refer Griffin to any other doctor for
outside care and bring specialists into his facility as needed.
Apparently Brent Hanson of LasikFraud has never heard of comanagement.
Nice try to deflect the fact that Kathy Griffin chose a CRSQA
Certified Refractive Surgeon for care after treatment for epithelial
ingrowth was delayed and she suffered subsequent corneal damage.
lasik...@yahoo.com
recovery with treatment and specialized contact lenses."
1) If Dr. Assil actually was capable if fixing problems caused by Dr.
Robert Maloney, a CRSQA "certified" surgeon, then Kathy would not need
contacts.
2) Glenn Hagele has no way of knowing Kathy Griffin's prognosis or
diagnosis without
a) Viewing her medical charts
b) Reviewing the public statements made Kathy Griffin at
http://www.kathygriffin.net/lasik.php
Glenn - USAEyes.org
CRSQA / USAEyes.org of HIPPA Violation.
Brent Hanson is the perfect example of "give him enough rope and he
will hang himself". Brent Hanson of LasikFraud.com seems to be able to
"hang himself" again and again and again.
As if a response is necessary: I have not violated any HIPPA
regulations in regard to Kathy Griffin, Robert Maloney, Kerry Assil,
or any other patient or provider.
It appears to me that Brent Hanson's inability to recognize fact from
fiction is surpassed only by his ability to create false accusations
with no justification.
Ragnar
month. It hasn't been updated in 5 months now.
She is just fading away into her self-inflicted obscurity.
Brent Hanson - LASIKFRAUD.com
to promote eye care and health, pimp patients with healthy eyes to
another group of doctors who sytematically compromise visual quality
and corneal integrity of healthy eyes for the motive of personal profit.
Brent Hanson - LASIKFRAUD.com
Someone should warn her off immediately and get her to a GOOD doctor!
Anybody have her e-mail address?
Glenn - USAEyes.org
"pimps"? All the optometrists who work with ophthalmologists to
provide postoperative vision remediation for those who have poor
outcomes "compromise visual quality"?
Brent Hanson of LasikFraud.com has so many perceived "pimps" that he
can't see straight....pun intended.
Glenn - USAEyes.org
idiocy can extend beyond its normal range?
Hanson, you better get that time machine out of your basement and go
back to rearrange all your statements about Kathy Griffin to put them
in order so at least your idiocy keeps a coherent timeline.
Sandy
Ragnar wrote:
> Also note that Griffin's website used to routinely update every other
> month. It hasn't been updated in 5 months now.
> She is just fading away into her self-inflicted obscurity.
What's your schedule for the next few months, Christopher? Here's
Kathy's:
Two HBO specials weren't enough! She has more stories, more dish, more
of what she shouldn't say but you know you want to hear. Come with an
open mind and laugh until you puke . . . just a little.
UPCOMING SHOWS
The Alcazar Theatre, Geary St. in San Francisco, CA
Saturday, December 31st 2005 at 8:00 and 10:30 PM
Resorts Atlantic City in Atlantic City, NJ
Sunday, January 1st 2006 at 9:00 PM
Colony Theatre in Miami Beach, FL
Wednesday, January 18th 2006 at 7:00 PM & 9:30 PM
Berklee Performance Center in Boston, MA
Friday, January 20th 2006 at 8:00 PM
The Ridgefield Playhouse in Ridgefield, CT
Saturday, January 21st 2006 at 8:00 PM
Majestic Theatre in San Antonio, TX
Wednesday, January 25th 2006 at 8:00 PM
Paramount Theatre in Austin, TX
Thursday, January 26th 2006 at 8:00 PM
Mohegan Sun Cabaret Theatre in Uncasville, CT
February 1st-4th 2006 at 7:30 PM and 7:00 & 10:00 PM on Saturday
Hobby Center in Houston, TX
Tuesday, February 14th 2006 at 8:00 PM
Louisville Palace Theatre in Louisville, KY
Wednesday, February 15th 2006 at 8:00 PM
The Paramount Theater in Charlottesville, VA
Thursday, February 16th 2006 at 8:00 PM
Caesars Tahoe in Lake Tahoe, NV
Friday, March 3rd 2006 at 9:00 PM
The Suncoast Hotel & Casino in Las Vegas, NV
April 14th-16th 2006 at 7:30 PM
The Hillbert Circle Theatre in Indianapolis, IN
Friday, April 28th 2006 at 9:00 PM
Ohio Theatre in Cleveland, OH
Saturday, April 29th 2006 at 8:00 PM
Heard Theatre at RiverCenter in Columbus, GA
Friday, May 12th, 2006 at 7:30 PM
Van Wezel Performing Arts Hall in Sarasota, FL
Saturday, May 13th 2006 at 8:00 PM
The Florida Theater in Jacksonville, FL
Sunday, May 14th 2006 at 8:00 PM
State Theatre in New Brunswick, NJ
Friday, June 2nd 2006 at 8:00 PM
R Family Vacations Cruise
Wednesday, July 5th 2006
Humphrey's Concerts By The Bay in San Diego, CA
Friday, August 11th 2006 (Time TBA)
Mohegan Sun Cabaret Theatre in Uncasville, CT
October 18th-22nd 2006 at 7:30 PM, 8:00 PM on Sat. & 7:00 PM on Sun.
Sandy
occurring due to the epithelial ingrowth, Dr. Maloney's office
contacted her and tried to get her to return, but that she had already
lost faith in his ability to correct the problem and was determined to
never go back to him.
Glenn - USAEyes.org
Griffin said.
Sandy
actually trained Dr. Maloney, so I'm sure that he did a superb job of
cleaning up the epithelial ingrowth.
Sandy
statements issued by Dr. Maloney. It should also serve as a rebuttal
to the accusation you are making, Glenn:
"Statement #4: "Kathy disregarded Dr. Maloney's advice to get this
injury treated"
Dr. Maloney performed the 3rd lasik procedure, WaveFront, on Kathy on
6/24/03. This procedure failed to improve Kathy's vision and for the
first time she developed Epithelial Cell Ingrowth. Dr. Maloney
performed surgery #4 on Kathy's right eye on 7/3/03 for the purpose
of removing the cell ingrowth. It wasn't until a checkup a few
months later that Dr. Maloney told Kathy the Epithelial Cells had
returned yet again. After four eye surgeries and countless visits to
Dr. Maloney's office, Kathy lost confidence in Dr. Maloney's
abilities and assurances. She began to seek opinions from other
doctors. She saw no reason to keep Dr. Maloney informed of her visits
to those other doctors. It became increasingly apparent that there are
many different views on how to treat this injury in the lasik
community."
Glenn - USAEyes.org
Keller, Ariel Berschadsky and others, people with a biased opinion
often publish only one side of a story on their website
It is all too convenient that Ms. Griffin has not released Dr. Maloney
from his confidentiality requirements so he can publicly present his
side of the issue. She has the ability to say just about anything she
wants, but Dr. Maloney can say almost nothing.
Griffin is correct that there are "many different views on how to
treat" epithelial ingrowth, but not returning to your doctor for
follow-up care when requested really is not one that I would
recommend.
Sandy
Glenn - USAEyes.org wrote:
> As has been evidenced at websites created by Brent Hanson, Sandy
> Keller, Ariel Berschadsky and others, people with a biased opinion
> often publish only one side of a story on their website
Kathy presented both sides--statements issued by Dr. Maloney or his
representative, along with her side of the story.
You want my doctors' sides of my story?
Dr. Weinman: It was Dr. Hawley's job to measure her pupils.
Dr. Hawley: It was Dr. Weinman's job to measure her pupils.
There you have the short version. They sure made my attorneys' jobs
easy. Maybe it's time to put their depositions on the internet so that
you cannot accuse me of being unfair and only publishing my biased side
of the story.
Glenn, did you know that Dr. Maloney testified on behalf of Dr. Hawley
last month in the state's case with regard to my surgery?
>
> It is all too convenient that Ms. Griffin has not released Dr. Maloney
> from his confidentiality requirements so he can publicly present his
> side of the issue. She has the ability to say just about anything she
> wants, but Dr. Maloney can say almost nothing.
>
> Griffin is correct that there are "many different views on how to
> treat" epithelial ingrowth, but not returning to your doctor for
> follow-up care when requested really is not one that I would
> recommend.
How many times would you allow a doctor to try unsuccessfully to repair
a complication Glenn? According to your reasoning, I should have
remained in the "care" of Dr. Weinman and allowed him to keep operating
on my eye until he got it right.
>
> Glenn Hagele
> Executive Director
> USAEyes.org
>
> "Consider and Choose With Confidence"
>
> Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
>
> http://www.USAEyes.org
> http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
>
> I am not a doctor.
Are you implying that Dr. Maloney is helpless to defend his reputation?
Her comments are in rebuttal to statements Dr. Maloney or his agent
made to the press.
Glenn - USAEyes.org
>
>Glenn - USAEyes.org wrote:
>> As has been evidenced at websites created by Brent Hanson, Sandy
>> Keller, Ariel Berschadsky and others, people with a biased opinion
>> often publish only one side of a story on their website
>
>Kathy presented both sides--statements issued by Dr. Maloney or his
>representative, along with her side of the story.
Dr. Maloney is severely restricted by professional standards as to
what he can and cannot say. All details of the care provided and
attempted to be provided to Griffin are NOT presented to the public.
>You want my doctors' sides of my story?
>
>Dr. Weinman: It was Dr. Hawley's job to measure her pupils.
>Dr. Hawley: It was Dr. Weinman's job to measure her pupils.
>
>There you have the short version. They sure made my attorneys' jobs
>easy. Maybe it's time to put their depositions on the internet so that
>you cannot accuse me of being unfair and only publishing my biased side
>of the story.
>
>Glenn, did you know that Dr. Maloney testified on behalf of Dr. Hawley
>last month in the state's case with regard to my surgery?
Keller, not every person's experience with refractive surgery is all
about you.
>> It is all too convenient that Ms. Griffin has not released Dr. Maloney
>> from his confidentiality requirements so he can publicly present his
>> side of the issue. She has the ability to say just about anything she
>> wants, but Dr. Maloney can say almost nothing.
>>
>> Griffin is correct that there are "many different views on how to
>> treat" epithelial ingrowth, but not returning to your doctor for
>> follow-up care when requested really is not one that I would
>> recommend.
>
>How many times would you allow a doctor to try unsuccessfully to repair
>a complication Glenn? According to your reasoning, I should have
>remained in the "care" of Dr. Weinman and allowed him to keep operating
>on my eye until he got it right.
Get a clue, Keller. We are not talking about you.
Anyone who is knowledgeable understands that epithelial ingrowth is
normally a rather benign complication that can be resolved with
removal of the epithelial cells. Sometimes they can be stubborn and
re-occur, but removal is the resolution. See
http://www.usaeyes.org/faq/subjects/ingrowth.htm
About the only way damage will occur from epithelial ingrowth is if
the patient does not receive appropriate treatment in a timely
fashion. That is exactly what happened to Griffin and a contributing
fact is that she did not respond to her doctor's repeated attempts to
get her back into the office for treatment.
>Are you implying that Dr. Maloney is helpless to defend his reputation?
> Her comments are in rebuttal to statements Dr. Maloney or his agent
>made to the press.
He is most certainly restricted, but I would never describe Dr.
Maloney as "helpless".
Sandy
discussed Kathy's website without mentioning my name. Get a clue.
Glenn - USAEyes.org
Berschadsky, Brent Hanson, and others publish one-sided heavily biased
websites full of misinformation that do not present the full truth.
You did not need to come here to prove your unreasoned bias and
inability to present the full truth. That has already been well
established.
Sandy
I haven't found it necessary to lie about what happened to me. The
truth was bad enough.
Glenn - USAEyes.org
you anyway.
Ragnar
is going to have a hard time doing that and going through her DIVORCE
at the same time. And who is going to manage her? Nobody would put
up with her the way her husband did.
The HBO special was SEVEN YEARS ago. Her semi-recent Bravo show was a
bomb. She is done.
Sandy
"Monday, November 28, 2005
Kathy Griffin
Kathy Griffin is reportedly back together with Matt
Here comes yet another story about a reality TV couple's relationship
(what's going on?), but this is good news: After filing for divorce
back in Sept., Kathy Griffin is reportedly back together with her
husband, Matt Moline."
Sandy
> Her comments are in rebuttal to statements Dr. Maloney or his agent
>made to the press.
<He is most certainly restricted, but I would never describe Dr.
<Maloney as "helpless".
<Glenn Hagele
<Executive Director
<USAEyes.org
<"Consider and Choose With Confidence"
<Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
<I am not a doctor.
No, Dr. Maloney is not helpless. He allows you access to confidential
patient information, and you post it on the internet, circumventing
HIPAA regulations.
Glenn - USAEyes.org
Glenn - USAEyes.org
accusation is unfounded.
Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
USAEyes.org
"Consider and Choose With Confidence"
Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org
http://www.USAEyes.org
http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org
Sandy
meant that you found a convenient way around the rules. Dr. Maloney
and his office (a covered entity) gives you/CRSQA (with whom he has a
business relationship) access to confidential patient information.
You/CRSQA, (a non-covered entity) turn around and publish it on the
internet for the entire world to see.
I know that I've seen "Glenn Hagele" and the word "slick" used in the
same sentence previously.
I wonder if intentional circumvention of HIPAA regulations is
actionable.....
Glenn - USAEyes.org
organization we are covered under HIPAA and nothing was
"circumvented".
You are simply sore that the truth is out and you don't have a
legitimate reason to blame Dr. Maloney for something.
Sandy
truth!
I'm not sore about anything, Hagele. I don't need to blame Dr. Maloney
for anything. I know that epithelial ingrowth is fairly common after
flap relifts, because the edge of the flap is torn and doesn't seal
back down as smoothly as when freshly cut. I had it myself, remember?
I know of another Maloney patient who had it as well after a relift,
but that's irrelevant.
You are posting someone's medical history without their permission.
You have blamed this person for her problems after suffering a
complication and what you don't get is that you have posted what you
claim is Dr. Maloney's record of what happened, and you are able to go
back to him and ask him about certain things. Kathy Griffin has not
posted a timetable, nor many of the other details surrounding what
happened. You are not talking to her. You have discounted what she
has stated and taken Dr. Maloney's side without giving Kathy the
opportunity for rebuttal.
Glenn - USAEyes.org
have no merit. You just can't handle the truth.
Marshall Cosme
This is a must read on eye health and maintainance. You may or may not be
affected , but you might be shocked!
Please excuse the interruption , but I thought you may be interested to know
what may be causing all kinds of health problems for yourself or for your
loved ones. I can't seem to get it through to my wife's brain about this
vital health issue, Now she is always saying she is having trouble with her
vision. Gee, I wonder why? I am so pissed off right now, I really want to
slap some sense into her. She has been feeding this poison to my four
children for years after I asked her not too, so you can see why I said what
I said previously, but I would never hit my wife. Why are people ignore what
science brings to are attention about health issues. I am really upset, but
I hope this helps you....since I can't get through to my wife of 16
years.....!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
<lasik...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1135707632.9...@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Glenn Hagele stated that "Griffin is expected to make a full vision
> recovery with treatment and specialized contact lenses."
>
> 1) If Dr. Assil actually was capable if fixing problems caused by Dr.
> Robert Maloney, a CRSQA "certified" surgeon, then Kathy would not need
> contacts.
>
> 2) Glenn Hagele has no way of knowing Kathy Griffin's prognosis or
> diagnosis without
> a) Viewing her medical charts
> b) Reviewing the public statements made Kathy Griffin at
> http://www.kathygriffin.net/lasik.php
>
Marshall Cosme
This is a must read on eye health and maintainance. You may or may not be
affected , but you might be shocked!
Please excuse the interruption , but I thought you may be interested to know
what may be causing all kinds of health problems for yourself or for your
loved ones. I can't seem to get it through to my wife's brain about this
vital health issue, Now she is always saying she is having trouble with her
vision. Gee, I wonder why? I am so pissed off right now, I really want to
slap some sense into her. She has been feeding this poison to my four
children for years after I asked her not too, so you can see why I said what
I said previously, but I would never hit my wife. Why are people ignore what
science brings to are attention about health issues. I am really upset, but
I hope this helps you....since I can't get through to my wife of 16
years.....!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
news:ok73r1t51hftpenc1...@4ax.com...
> Also note that Griffin's website used to routinely update every other
> month. It hasn't been updated in 5 months now.
> She is just fading away into her self-inflicted obscurity.
>
>
> <glenn.hage...@USAEyes.org> wrote:
>
>>LOL. Brent Hanson of LasikFraud doesn't just can't handle being called
>>on his bovine fertilizer. He tries again and again to deflect the
>>facts and sets loose another red herring.
>>
>>On 27 Dec 2005 04:49:28 -0800, "Brent Hanson - LASIKFRAUD.com"
>><admini...@lasikcourt.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Glenn Hagele states that "Griffin is expected to make a full vision
>>>recovery with treatment and specialized contact lenses."
>>>
>>>make a full vision recovery unless Kathy in fact conveyed this
>>>information to Hagele.
>>
>>Griffin had previously stated in an interview that recovery with
>>contacts was expected, HOWEVER her personal website now says that her
>>vision is poor. So things may have changed or her website is not up to
>>date.
>>
>>>2) Dr. Assil does not fit specialized contact lenses -- he is a
>>>refractive surgeon. So apparently Dr. Assil is NOT capable of
>>>repairing damaged caused by Dr. Maloney.
>>
>>Not only does Dr. Assil have the ability and talent to fit specialized
>>lenses, he is also able to refer Griffin to any other doctor for
>>outside care and bring specialists into his facility as needed.
>>Apparently Brent Hanson of LasikFraud has never heard of comanagement.
>>
>>Nice try to deflect the fact that Kathy Griffin chose a CRSQA
>>Certified Refractive Surgeon for care after treatment for epithelial
>>ingrowth was delayed and she suffered subsequent corneal damage.