IF IT'S NOT LATIN IT'S NOT RITE
Rite scriptum, Amice, et rite intellectum.
Edus
When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the
dunces are in a confederacy against him. ~Swift
Hoc signo ingenium verum noveris; quod omnium stultorum confoederatio
contra eum fiet.
Edus
I had that debate with myself when I was writing it; and I settled for
"eum" with good reason. I've reconsidered based on your objection, but I
still go for "eum". OK, so I'll expound on my reasoning. It'll probably
stimulate some good debate.
You can say "Multitudo magna hominum adest" or "Multitudo magna hominum
adsunt"; it matches English - a crowd of people is/are present.
Secondly there's that famous sentence of Vergil's "Varium et semper
mutabile femina" (woman is a fickle thing).
And thirdly, the hoi polloi tend not to attack the intelligentsia in the
"ingenium"; no, they launch their attacks more against the man, trample
on his flower-beds or call him names.
Well, there are my reasons; grammatical ones and semantic ones. So I'm
sticking with "eum".
Another solution might be to have "homo summo ingenio" rather than
"ingenium".
Ed
P.S. Waquet's stark view is a bit depressing even to me. But I can
probably find peace with it more easily than yourself.
There's "dead" and then there's "dead". Shakespeare is dead, but not his
plays. Horace is dead, but not his poems. Homer is dead, but everybody's
heard of Helen of Troy.