P2P Share files by email on Thu 04/25/2013

[Share.f...@email.con]

Do you think that Peer-to-Peer, FTP
IRC technologies etc...are too much complicated !?
There is a simpler technology to use, Autosend.
This software allows file-sharing by only using
your e-mail account. Autosend allows sharing files
on your computer through regular email.
It is an automatic file mailer

It completly Anonymous,secure,no spy,and nobody
can known what you do !!!!

People just make requests by sending a mail to the
server email address. The subject of the mail
is the name of the requested file or command
Autosend checks for new mails periodically in
its mailbox and replies automatically
with the requested file as attachment. Autosend
can also receive files sent by others (uploads),
answer to some commands or pick up
files for you on internet. Simple as this!

three command can be use : ?list or ?put or ?find
?list will send you a list of all files
?put will receive a files attach from you ( UPLOAD )
?find xxxx to find patern files

Send a EMAIL TO : >>>> request...@yahoo.ca
in the subject : >>>> ?list

OR search

Send a EMAIL TO : >>>> request...@yahoo.ca
in the subject : >>>> ?find XXXX

For XXXX replace by a keyword or search you want !

in the message body write nothing , leave Empty
And Send it , later in the day you will receive
a list of files available

click the file you want you email program will open ,
send the message change nothing in the message
just send it , later in the day you will receive the files


if you have a prob with you mail program just send a email
to : request...@yahoo.ca
subject : The files you want << must be Exactly like the file in the list
send it now ...

---
TO.receive.email.with.a.list.of.files.available,.replace.the.http://.with.the.line.BELOW..in.your.browser
mailto:request...@yahoo.ca?subject=!list&Body=Send.this.files.without.modification
To.message.me.,.replace.the.http://.with.the.line.BELOW..in.your.browser
mailto:request...@yahoo.ca?subject=!msg&Body=Send.this.files.with.your.message/email.below.this.line..

[Rod Pemberton]

<Share.f...@email.con> wrote in message
news:01ce41e8$Blat.v3.1.1$91761f3a$1ec0a3...@192.168.10.30...

> Do you think that Peer-to-Peer, FTP
> IRC technologies etc...are too much complicated !?

Um, no, not really...

Did you spam and go, or are you still around?

I hope you're still around. I'd like you to read my comments.

Modern, webpage (html) file dropbox services are very easy to use
and free. Webmail (web e-mail) probably is also easy to use.

> There is a simpler technology to use, Autosend.
> This software allows file-sharing by only using
> your e-mail account. Autosend allows sharing files
> on your computer through regular email.
> It is an automatic file mailer
>

Seriously, is this a joke ... ?

That's called an e-mail attachment. You can attach and send any
file you want to whomever you have an email address for, filesize
permitting. I.e., it's not a problem with major email providers
and ISPs, but you might hit a 32KB filesize limited email system
or a 7-bit system on exceptionally rare occasions...

> It completly Anonymous,secure,no spy,and nobody
> can known what you do !!!!

You said: "no spy" ... Are you serious?!?! Untrue, someone is
spying on it even if it's not you, e.g., governments, militaries,
...

You do know that a US government agency called the NSA archives
*ALL* emails that go through US ISPs and network trunks on US
soil since 9/11, yes? E.g., that includes some traffic from
Mexico and Canada and elsewhere. So, your idea of using email to
send and receive files actually *increases* spying...

Why do you think there have been so many terrorist arrests and so
few terrorist events since 9/11? It's call "Big Brother". The US
government is spying on you in every way they can. Of course,
they have far more data on and more authority over US citizens
than non-citizens...

Why would anyone trust that your service is secret or "[no one]
can [know] what you do"?

You have access to all the files or emails transmitted through the
service... You can look at anything you want as long as it's not
encrypted or secured via a password.

A service like yours _could_ be used for all sorts of malicious or
nefarious stuff, either by you, or by your users: malware, adware,
phishing for IPs or personal or credit data, copyright
infringement, etc. Personally, I'd be leary of using such a
service...

> People just make requests by sending a mail to the
> server email address. The subject of the mail
> is the name of the requested file or command
> Autosend checks for new mails periodically in
> its mailbox and replies automatically
> with the requested file as attachment. Autosend
> can also receive files sent by others (uploads),
> answer to some commands or pick up
> files for you on internet. Simple as this!
>

This sounds like an email dropbox or anonymous ftp which uses ftp
or listserver style commands ...

Personally, I don't see the point. There are all sorts of ways to
send data: ftp, telnet, webpages, web forums, email, Tor, Usenet
servers, IRC, games, UDP or DNS tunnels, P2P fileshare, etc.

How is this any easier than ftp or listserve or html based dropbox
or an email service or Usenet or any of the other services you
dislike?

The html file dropbox sites, you just select the file you want to
upload in your browser. It's uploaded. You get a unique link.
Whomever you send the link to, can download the file using the
link in their web browser. Simple. Easy. If you want minimal
security, encrypt the file or use a password with your archiver.

> [listserve which reminds me of 1994 ...]
>

Do you know what a listserve is?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_mailing_list

Have you ever used one?

Well, you're operating one, now. They really haven't been used
much since html based webpages and webforums became popular.


You'd probably be better off promoting your Usenet server (in
Canada). Although, more than a few people now use the free and
excellent AIOE.org now.


Rod Pemberton

[Nathan]

[dropped AOD because ALA is *the* place for armchair conjecturing]

On Apr 26, 7:34 pm, "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_h...@notemailnotq.cpm>
wrote:

>
> You do know that a US government agency called the NSA archives
> *ALL*  emails that go through US ISPs and network trunks on US
> soil since 9/11, yes?  E.g., that includes some traffic from
> Mexico and Canada and elsewhere.  So, your idea of using email to
> send and receive files actually *increases* spying...
>

Okay. But how does any agency filter through that mountain of data to
locate a real threat? Also, how many people are actually "important"
enough that an agency would have them on a "watch list" in the first
place? Surely, a lot of things would have to line-up in a perfect
'doubt-free' pattern (bank transactions, welfare fraud, organizational
membership, cellphone based social-networking traffic, geographic
travel trends, etc) to cause a red-flag at a high level Pentagon or
Cyber Command meeting.

Besides, you are making an assumption that the OP wants to "hide" from
"Big Brother." Perhaps the intent is to have a bit of privacy from a
nosy spouse, teenager, or some script-kiddy hackers who happen to
surround the OP's digital environment. In that case, I'd suggest some
sort of "sneaker net" solution: in-person trades of DVDs,
thumbdrives, or SD cards. If geographic distance is a problem, some
sort of VPN would be ideal.

Just my "two cents" worth...

Nathan.

[Rod Pemberton]

"Nathan" <nathan...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:0a246a7d-2a25-4a55...@b2g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...

> On Apr 26, 7:34 pm, "Rod Pemberton"
<do_not_h...@notemailnotq.cpm>
> wrote:

[dropped AOD because ALA is *the* place for armchair conjecturing]

Just how do you know I'm on ALA and not AOD only ... ? ;-)

> > You do know that a US government agency called the NSA
> > archives *ALL* emails that go through US ISPs and network
> > trunks on US soil since 9/11, yes? E.g., that includes some
> > traffic from Mexico and Canada and elsewhere. So, your
> > idea of using email to send and receive files actually
> > *increases* spying...
> >
>
> Okay. But how does any agency filter through that mountain of
> data to locate a real threat?

Conjecture:
custom mainframes,
statistics and probability,
databases with search engines,
etc...

> Also, how many people are actually "important" enough
> that an agency would have them on a "watch list" in the
> first place?

At last reported count, there were over 500,000 individuals in the
NCTC TIDE database. Thats approximately 1 out of every 10000
people on the planet, or roughly the entire State of Wyoming, the
least populous US State as of 2012. A few years earlier, it
could've been Vermont or the entire District of Columbia
(ironic?). That database is used to produce the FBI terrorist
watchlists, etc. There are numerous other databases with huge
lists too, such as Dept. of Treasury OFAC SDN, Dept. of Treasury
FinCEN, FBI IAFIS, FBI NICS, FBI CODIS, etc etc etc ... (You can
find most or all of these listed on Wikipedia.)

You don't have to be "important" to be in one of these databases.
You don't have to be a "criminal" or "terrorist" for many of them
either. The FBI has the legal right to profile *ANY* US citizen
it deems to be "of interest", i.e., explains the Marilyn Monroe or
other celebrity FBI files. The NCTC can create "dossiers" on all
US citizens and maintain them for five years WITHOUT any legal
cause. The NCTC has legal access to *ALL* Federal databases,
i.e., social security, child support (HHS/OCSE NDNH database), FBI
IAFIS, FBI CODIS, TD FinCEN, etc. The FBI IAFIS fingerprint
database records fingerprints of criminals. However, it also
records fingerprints for numerous law abiding citizens. US
workers are routinely fingerprinted for job employment in
industries such as a law enforcement, fire departments, hospitals,
government institutions, public school employees, airports,
careers involving minors or elderly, brokerage, real estate, loan
officer, casinos, pharmacies, transportation of hazardous waste,
chemicals, explosives, and other jobs requiring security
clearances. The child support database (HHS/OCSE NDNH database)
is required by law to record *ALL* employed individuals in the US
whether they have children or not. The social security database
includes anyone with a social security number or tax payer
identification number. FinCEN gets reports on over 15 million US
financial transactions per year, most of which are legal. The
Library of Congress records *ALL* twitter posts. The NSA archives
*ALL* emails passing through US "soil" since 9/11.

These are just the "tip of the iceberg" so to speak. There are
many others at the Federal level. There are also State and
commercial databases.

> Surely, a lot of things would have to line-up in a perfect
> 'doubt-free' pattern (bank transactions, welfare fraud,
> organizational membership, cellphone based social-networking
> traffic, geographic travel trends, etc) to cause a red-flag at a
> high level Pentagon or Cyber Command meeting.

I doubt information needs "line-up in a perfect 'doubt-free'
pattern" to be useful to someone in a position of authority who is
willing to use or abuse that authority. There are many agencies
using this data for different reasons. The Pentagon would only
need a small percentage of it. Much of it is used by other law
enforcement agencies or law enforcement actions.

The problem is two-fold. 1) The recent proliferation of large
Federal databases for various legal and rational reasons, that
contain vast amounts of information on US citizens. 2) The NCTC
now has the legal right to access all Federal databases. The two,
inconjuction, have effectively become "Big Brother".

> Besides, you are making an assumption that the OP wants
> to "hide" from "Big Brother."

I don't think it's an assumption. I think he stated it:

"It completly[sic] Anonymous,secure,no spy,and
nobody can known[sic] what you do !!!!"

The other likely option is he's phishing for certain, various
types of content, e.g., credit card info, or illicit pr0n, or
pirated software, movies, or music, etc. Clearly, he hasn't heard
of Tor, BitTorrent, or other software... Personally, I'm guessing
he's a young "script kiddy" who didn't realize he just recreated
the late 1980's and early 1990's...

> Perhaps the intent is to have a bit of privacy from a
> nosy spouse, teenager, or some script-kiddy hackers who happen
> to surround the OP's digital environment. In that case, I'd
> suggest some sort of "sneaker net" solution: in-person trades
> of DVDs, thumbdrives, or SD cards. If geographic distance
> is a problem, some sort of VPN would be ideal.

If so, why did he announce it on A.L.A. and A.O.D. ?


Rod Pemberton