Venus, the forbidden planet (3.0) / Brad Guth - alt.journalism

The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Message from discussion Venus, the forbidden planet (3.0) / Brad Guth
Path: h15ni133960bkw.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!f9g2000pbq.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Brad Guth <bradg...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,misc.education.science,uk.media.newspapers,alt.news-media,alt.journalism
Subject: Re: Venus, the forbidden planet (3.0) / Brad Guth
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 06:17:11 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 123
Message-ID: <b21c5516-a8c1-47e4-a82f-d04567a7c19f@f9g2000pbq.googlegroups.com>
References: <2b88ae8c-ff9d-49d8-9f27-c918c007cf57@oq7g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 174.125.117.128
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:17:11 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: f9g2000pbq.googlegroups.com; posting-host=174.125.117.128; posting-account=nf79RwoAAABXjvy5ztMzmPxgY1WGoktI
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Taking all sorts of new and old satellite imaging into account,
including those of Earth, our moon, other planets and a number of
their moons, by rights should give us some raw basis of
observationology for deductively interpreting such other places, such
as what the extremely nearby planet Venus has to offer.  Though how
can the natural formation and geology with its cooling, tectonics and
erosion of any other planet or moon become so entirely different from
that of our planet and moon?

Of course most K12s and higher educated have become incapable of
constructively interpreting anything outside of personal pleasures,
much less care about the greater good unless that leads to and/or
improves those pleasures that primarily benefit themselves.  Most (the
vast 99.9% majority) are simply incapable of even finding public
topics within Google Groups or via whatever Usenet/newsgroups, perhaps
because this public medium of mostly text is not loaded down with
excessive commercial media hype and eyecandy plus the sharing of HDTV
video-infomercials plus video-sexting that only function sufficiently
within the latest and most spendy of ISPs or intranet bandwidth that=92s
configured extensively for accommodating such interactive audio and
video pleasures, and otherwise of those media providers that are
otherwise not getting moderated to the point of excluding whatever
private contributions of topics and replies might have to offer, are
simply too few and far between.

So, in spite of all the usual mainstream obfuscation and their
expected denial of being in denial, what should the natural raw
terrain and its erosion formed geology of whatever 3D plan-view site
of any significant off-world logistics on behalf of depicting a large
scale mining operation look like from the air, or even better yet from
that perspective of a spendy spy satellite using SAR (Synthetic
Aperture Radar) imaging that=92s peering downward at 43 degrees, as for
compiling a derivative composite image from 36 confirming scans per
pixel, and subsequently should this image tend to look like anything
the least bit unusual?

For such a pressure-cooker environment, shouldn=92t there be any number
of large scale structures, possibly including a nearby airstrip or
some sort of relatively flat surface for shuttles or even for
accommodating extremely large industrial airships to utilize?

If there=92s any nearby deeply eroded or lava-flow created ravine or
otherwise naturally formed canyon, shouldn=92t that sort of vertically
offset terrain be logical as to our radar imaging capability detecting
some kind of bridge, if such existed?

For their local construction purposes, shouldn=92t there logically be a
nearby geometric reformed or modified area of a bedrock quarry site,
or two or three?

If having an atmospheric density worth 65+ kg/m3 buoyancy and only
90.5% gravity was the norm; what might a suitably commercial or
industrial class of large airship look like?

How and/or where upon such a toasty planet would that sort of large
airship be parked or safely stored until use? (in other words, what
sort of local infrastructure would be necessary for accommodating such
an industrial mining ore/cargo hauling airships?)

If the planet were geologically active and obviously science
quantified as having been venting new atmospheric elements like
crazy;  shouldn=92t there be a few natural and possibly artificial
reservoirs of local fluids that by rights of physics shouldn=92t boil
off?

If this were to be an actual ET or indigenous mining operation;
wouldn=92t the assortment and arrangement of such infrastructure have to
further suggest a rational community like layout or city/town like
configuration?

If this were all situated within a highly mountainous terrain;
wouldn=92t this community of large geometric structures and their
infrastructure need to look very much out of place from the otherwise
random geology happenstance of nature, or at the very least interpret
as way out of ordinary from anything mother or father nature could
have accomplished?

If the local terrain indicated by all sorts of science as having been
geologically active, and if there were multiple signs of substantial
ongoing heavy and/or dense gas/vapor venting of any sort of hot and
potential metallicity content;  as such shouldn=92t a pattern of that
vented outflow also be detected by the same SAR/SIR-C imaging methods?

I=92m certain if we start exploiting the full metallicity worth of our
moon, that when such efforts are viewed even from Earth, amateur
astronomers will be capable of imaging with sufficient resolution and
with colors/hues plus more than adequate dynamic range of contrast, as
to seeing our surface structures and identify their rational community
like infrastructure.  Of course, surface mining the naked moon would
be a very difficult and risky consideration (unless it were mostly
accomplished via TBMs operating entirely inside the mostly
paramagnetic basalt crust of the moon), than doing Venus that=92s most
likely considerably hotter inside than on the surface.

Perhaps yourself and others of any deductive image interpreting
expertise can add a little something from their very own
observationology talent to this growing list, of contributing to what
an actively thriving community of an intelligent mining operation
should look like, as imaged from the perspective of an advanced spy
satellite, keeping in mind that the scale of such items on any given
dimension has to be worth at least 75 meters/pixel or preferably
larger 225 m/pixel in order to count, so for the most part we=92re not
trying to interpret anything that=92s smaller than 225 meters per
geometric dimension.

Thumbnail images, including mgn_c115s095_1.gif (225 m/pixel)
 http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/thumbnail_pages/venus_thumbnails.html
 Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles, Venus from Magellan Cycle 1
 http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/html/object_page/mgn_c115s095_1.html
 http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/mgn_c115s095_1.gif
 =93Guth Venus=94 1:1, plus 10x resample/enlargement of the area in
question:
 https://picasaweb.google.com/bradguth/BradGuth#5630418595926178146
 https://picasaweb.google.com/bradguth/BradGuth#5629579402364691314
 Brad Guth / Blog and my Google document pages:
 http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet?hl=3Den
 http://bradguth.blogspot.com/
 http://docs.google.com/View?id=3Dddsdxhv_0hrm5bdfj
 http://groups.google.com/groups/search
 http://translate.google.com/#
 Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / =93Guth Usenet=94
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
Account Options
