Democrats Willing to Sacrifice Blacks
pres
The AUTHOR sez: On one hand, we have Sen. Clinton's supporters being
charged with intentionally trying to disenfranchise black voters in
North. But Sen. Obama is playing his own brand of risky politics. As
he works to maintain white support, he is forgetting his black base.
Click on: 'News Stories' at the top, scroll to Dems Push Blacks Away
geno4321
Your Doomed to Hell along with McCain.
"pres" <afamr...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0d031ff0-2ff8-47fc...@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
lora...@cs.com
Huh? That's whacky..
The black vote would be there for Obama.. even if the bloody glove did
fit.
The DNC actually faces a far greater threat - the loss of support from
women voters.
Day Brown
> Huh? That's whacky..
> The black vote would be there for Obama.. even if the bloody glove did
> fit.
> The DNC actually faces a far greater threat - the loss of support from
> women voters.
If the prices do not stabilize, they will look to Hillary, not Obama, to
do something.
spammer
>>
> Watch real estate prices. Lotsa middle class women have invested in it.
> If the prices do not stabilize, they will look to Hillary, not Obama, to
> do something.
Do what? Pay their mortgages for them?
David Morgan (MAMS)
"spammer" <sere...@yahoo.com> wrote in message...
> Do what? Pay their mortgages for them?
More than likely, request that the federal government block the
Fed and the World Bank from bailing out the criminal lenders
and let them take their just and deserved fall. Housing would
then be bought up by the highest bidder and real estate prices
would return to something within the grasp of mortal buyers.
After that, regulate the lending crooked industry under a nuclear
microscope.
While their asking, they might urge the re-regulating about 100% of
the shit that republicans have consistently been DE-regulating since
the Reagan days, which has subsequently led to the financial collapse
of the American middle class, and ultimately, the USA.
"No form of government, once in power, can be trusted to limit
its own ambition, to extend freedom and to wither away. This
means that it is up to the citizenry, those outside of power, to
engage in permanent combat with the state, short of violent,
escalatory revolution, but beyond the gentility of the ballot-box,
to insure justice, freedom and well being."
-- Howard Zinn
Patriot Games
wrote:
Freeze mortgaged interest rates. Hitlary already said she would.
Win Buckwheat gets the nomination will these women vote for him?
Probably not.
Will they vote for McCain?
Probably not.
McCain wins...
Day Brown
anything significant done, you need people killed. Hillary has been
working with the CIA ever since Mena. I dunno that either Obama or
McCain has the balls to do what needs to be done.
Bush and the GOP have gone a long ways twards creating an imperial
presidency, and with a Democratic sweep of Congress, Hitlery will have
who ever she wants taken out and shot in order to give the middle class
the sense that they still have an investment in this system worth
letting their boys sign up for the military.
Patriot Games
wrote:
>Patriot Games wrote:
>> On Tue, 13 May 2008 18:38:08 -0700 (PDT), spammer <sere...@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On May 13, 9:24 pm, Day Brown <daybr...@hughes.net> wrote:
>>>> Watch real estate prices. Lotsa middle class women have invested in it.
>>>> If the prices do not stabilize, they will look to Hillary, not Obama, to
>>>> do something.
>>> Do what? Pay their mortgages for them?
>> Freeze mortgaged interest rates. Hitlary already said she would.
>> Win Buckwheat gets the nomination will these women vote for him?
>> Probably not.
>> Will they vote for McCain?
>> Probably not.
>> McCain wins...
>In any case, DC is a tough town. Just ask Vince Foster. Sometimes, to get
>anything significant done, you need people killed. Hillary has been
>working with the CIA ever since Mena. I dunno that either Obama or
>McCain has the balls to do what needs to be done.
Buckwheat definately does NOT.
McCain definately DOES. The problem, of course, is what HE THINKS
"needs to be done."
>Bush and the GOP have gone a long ways twards creating an imperial
>presidency, and with a Democratic sweep of Congress, Hitlery will have
>who ever she wants taken out and shot in order to give the middle class
>the sense that they still have an investment in this system worth
>letting their boys sign up for the military.
This is what happens when the other team is several score ahead. The
"imperial" appearance of this Administration is a catch-up reaction to
a castrated (by Clinton) CIA and a crippled (by Clinton) Pentagon.
Why does Bush want to eavesdrop on anybody anytime? Because the Bad
Guys are right HERE right NOW.
Clinton dropped our guard. We got behind on the scoreboard.
If we didn't change to the Trick-Play Playbook we'd be in even worse
trouble.
Day Brown
> This is what happens when the other team is several score ahead. The
> "imperial" appearance of this Administration is a catch-up reaction to
> a castrated (by Clinton) CIA and a crippled (by Clinton) Pentagon.
of group think. Nobody was able to challenge the WMD in Iraq idea. You
need people who are not yes men. Bush didnt hire anyone with the balls
to disagree with him.
> Why does Bush want to eavesdrop on anybody anytime? Because the Bad
> Guys are right HERE right NOW.
and not progress, is the highest form of statecraft." Bush had no idea
what progress was, so had to focus on security. If he were really open
minded, he would have been told of the new lie detection technologies
and identified who was involved in 911 before it happened.
> Clinton dropped our guard. We got behind on the scoreboard.
Some of these technoogies were in place under his watch, but he never
looked into them either. In Both cases, it would have been possible to
use high speed high res video of Bush or Clinton during interviews to
determine who was lying when.
> If we didn't change to the Trick-Play Playbook we'd be in even worse
> trouble.
I dont think Obama has the balls or integrity to admit these new lie
detection technologies exist either, but somebody will sneak a high
speed high res camera into a press conference, and the slow motion
analysis of obscure facial muscles will be on Youtube to blow faith in
the corporate mass media out of the water.
Patriot Games
wrote:
>Patriot Games wrote:
>> This is what happens when the other team is several score ahead. The
>> "imperial" appearance of this Administration is a catch-up reaction to
>> a castrated (by Clinton) CIA and a crippled (by Clinton) Pentagon.
>The problem the CIA has had is not the lack of funds, but the abundance
>of group think.
That's true NOW, but it has only been since shortly AFTER 9/11 that
their funding was cranked back up to where it should have been.
>Nobody was able to challenge the WMD in Iraq idea. You
>need people who are not yes men. Bush didnt hire anyone with the balls
>to disagree with him.
The Plame Affair discounts your idea of "group think."
The "WMD in Iraq idea" was Solid Weak intel. Meaning the intel we had
was weak but what little we had was solid. This is a classic problem
in Intel.
>> Clinton dropped our guard. We got behind on the scoreboard.
>Some of these technoogies were in place under his watch, but he never
>looked into them either. In Both cases, it would have been possible to
>use high speed high res video of Bush or Clinton during interviews to
>determine who was lying when.
Then it should still be possible....
>> If we didn't change to the Trick-Play Playbook we'd be in even worse
>> trouble.
>I dont think Obama has the balls or integrity to admit these new lie
>detection technologies exist either, but somebody will sneak a high
>speed high res camera into a press conference, and the slow motion
>analysis of obscure facial muscles will be on Youtube to blow faith in
>the corporate mass media out of the water.
If the technology exists as you say then it SHOULD be deployed.