Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Did Obama's Black Skin Cause His Loss in NH?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  6 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
pres  
View profile  
 More options Jan 10 2008, 5:36 pm
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.journalism, alt.politics, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.democrats.d
From: pres <afamrep...@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:36:13 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Jan 10 2008 5:36 pm
Subject: Did Obama's Black Skin Cause His Loss in NH?
Some pundits say the "Bradley effect," may explain why the polls were
so wrong in the New Hampshire Democratic primary, where Hillary
Clinton won a stunning come-from-behind victory over Barack Obama.

Despite all the talk of how little race matters in this campaign, it
is clear that race is still a big deal in biracial campaigns," argued
David Kuo, a former policy adviser to U.S. President George W. Bush.
"And it has showed up for the first time in a measurable way in the
2008 presidential race."

Go to: http://www.afamreport.com/

Click on: 'News Stories' at the top, scroll to NH Voters and Race


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
PerfectlyAble  
View profile  
 More options Jan 10 2008, 6:08 pm
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.journalism, alt.politics, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.democrats.d
From: PerfectlyAble <j...@kol.co.nz>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:08:16 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Jan 10 2008 6:08 pm
Subject: Re: Did Obama's Black Skin Cause His Loss in NH?
On Jan 11, 11:36 am, pres <afamrep...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Some pundits say the "Bradley effect," may explain why the polls were
> so wrong in the New Hampshire Democratic primary, where Hillary
> Clinton won a stunning come-from-behind victory over Barack Obama.

> Despite all the talk of how little race matters in this campaign, it
> is clear that race is still a big deal in biracial campaigns," argued
> David Kuo, a former policy adviser to U.S. President George W. Bush.
> "And it has showed up for the first time in a measurable way in the
> 2008 presidential race."

> Go to:http://www.afamreport.com/

> Click on: 'News Stories' at the top, scroll to NH Voters and Race

I disagree, Obama isn't 'Black' enough for people
to discriminate. He grew up in Hawaii, he doesn't
represent pacific peoples or black America.
Clinton is however very representative of Women,
Motherhood and has experience. It won't be the
Bush oil man syndrome of a fighter pilot who
never saw action and never found oil.
Obama seems to be all hype and we know hat happened
the last time a wraith become President.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
David Morgan (MAMS)  
View profile  
 More options Jan 11 2008, 2:19 am
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.journalism, alt.politics, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.democrats.d
From: "David Morgan \(MAMS\)" <fin...@m-a-m-s.comC/Odm>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:19:55 GMT
Local: Fri, Jan 11 2008 2:19 am
Subject: Re: Did Obama's Black Skin Cause His Loss in NH?

"PerfectlyAble" <j...@kol.co.nz> wrote in message...
> and we know hat happened
> the last time a wraith become President.

Obama (as a person) is pretty irrelevant [just like the other candidates] given
the manner in which things are being reported by the mainstream media.

Tell me, have you heard *anthing* during the reporting of the recent caucuses
that pertained to the actual character, service, and voting history of **ANY** of
the candidates??  Not jack squat has been reported about their record, policies,
or their views / platforms.  The ONLY thing being reported is how much money
the candidate has, can raise, or are already spending of purchasing their sound
bites.  I know these people have spoken for HOURS over the past few weeks,
but for the past two days I've heard nothing but the same quotes over and over
and over and over.... none of it relative to politics.

That's how the wraith George W. Bush became president.... he BOUGHT it.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
David Morgan (MAMS)  
View profile  
 More options Jan 11 2008, 2:22 am
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.journalism, alt.politics, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.democrats.d
From: "David Morgan \(MAMS\)" <fin...@m-a-m-s.comC/Odm>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:22:02 GMT
Local: Fri, Jan 11 2008 2:22 am
Subject: Re: Did Obama's Black Skin Cause His Loss in NH?
And here's "the lighter side" of all that.....

;-)

Poll:  Bullshit Is Most Important Issue For 2008 Voters

http://www.theonion.com/content/video/poll_bullshit_is_most_important

For a majority of likely voters, meaningless bullshit will be the most
important factor in deciding who they will vote for in 2008.

                                 *


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Bert Hyman  
View profile  
 More options Jan 11 2008, 9:16 am
Newsgroups: alt.journalism, alt.politics, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.democrats.d
From: Bert Hyman <b...@iphouse.com>
Date: 11 Jan 2008 14:16:35 GMT
Local: Fri, Jan 11 2008 9:16 am
Subject: Re: Did Obama's Black Skin Cause His Loss in NH?
afamrep...@hotmail.com (pres) wrote in
news:29c711cc-f402-44d7-8499-eb8099d648c7@y5g2000hsf.googlegroups.com:

> Some pundits say the "Bradley effect," may explain why the polls
> were so wrong in the New Hampshire Democratic primary, where Hillary
> Clinton won a stunning come-from-behind victory over Barack Obama.

Maybe it's time to point out that Obama didn't really "lose" in New
Hampshire, and neither did Clinton "win".

New Hampshire primaries are not winner-take-all.

Obama and Clinton each claimed 9 delegates, so they actually tied.

--
Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN | b...@iphouse.com


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
pres  
View profile  
 More options Jan 11 2008, 9:36 am
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.journalism, alt.politics, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.democrats.d
From: pres <afamrep...@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 06:36:57 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri, Jan 11 2008 9:36 am
Subject: Re: Did Obama's Black Skin Cause His Loss in NH?
On Jan 11, 2:22 am, "David Morgan \(MAMS\)" <fin...@m-a-m-s.comC/Odm>
wrote:

> And here's "the lighter side" of all that.....

> ;-)

> Poll:  Bullshit Is Most Important Issue For 2008 Voters

> http://www.theonion.com/content/video/poll_bullshit_is_most_important

> For a majority of likely voters, meaningless bullshit will be the most
> important factor in deciding who they will vote for in 2008.

>                                  *

how true.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google