Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Retrograde orbits are now approved (what could possibly go wrong?)
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 101 - 125 of 223 - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals) < Older  Newer >
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
palsing  
View profile  
 More options Apr 10 2012, 8:33 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, sci.space.policy, sci.space.history, uk.sci.misc, alt.journalism
From: palsing <pnals...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:33:24 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Apr 10 2012 8:33 pm
Subject: Re: Retrograde orbits are now approved (what could possibly go wrong?)
On Apr 10, 10:14 am, Brad Guth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Carbonado is not from Earth, other than deposited upon Earth and/or
> created by horrific meteor/asteroid impacts.

Really?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbonado

"Carbonado, commonly known as the "Black Diamond", is a natural
polycrystalline diamond found in alluvial deposits in the Central
African Republic and Brazil. Its natural colour is black or dark grey,
and it is more porous than other diamonds."

"The origin of carbonado is controversial. Some proposed hypotheses
are as follows:

Direct conversion of organic carbon under high-pressure conditions in
the Earth's interior, the most common hypothesis for diamond formation
Shock metamorphism induced by meteoritic impact at the Earth's surface
Radiation-induced diamond formation by spontaneous fission of uranium
and thorium
Formation inside an earlier-generation giant star in our area, that
would have long ago exploded in a supernova.
An origin in interstellar space, due to the impact of an asteroid,
rather than being thrown from within an exploding star.

None of these hypotheses for carbonado formation had come into wide
acceptance in the scientific literature by 2008."


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Warhol  
View profile  
 More options Apr 10 2012, 9:49 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, sci.space.policy, sci.space.history, uk.sci.misc, alt.journalism
From: Warhol <mol...@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Apr 10 2012 9:49 pm
Subject: Re: Retrograde orbits are now approved (what could possibly go wrong?)
On Apr 11, 1:45 am, Dean <damark...@gmail.com> wrote:

no he doesn't... its because he is a sick Lunatic or shall I a say
Venustic, for our brad... but he remains someone possessed by
demons... the poor souls which only Jesus can save them from their
demoniac possession

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBKUAJv4lWI


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dean  
View profile  
 More options Apr 11 2012, 8:03 am
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, sci.space.policy, sci.space.history, uk.sci.misc, alt.journalism
From: Dean <damark...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 05:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Apr 11 2012 8:03 am
Subject: Re: Retrograde orbits are now approved (what could possibly go wrong?)
On Apr 10, 9:49 pm, Warhol <mol...@hotmail.com> wrote:

LOL, well there's the pot calling the kettle black.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dean  
View profile  
 More options Apr 11 2012, 8:04 am
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, sci.space.policy, sci.space.history, uk.sci.misc, alt.journalism
From: Dean <damark...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 05:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Apr 11 2012 8:04 am
Subject: Re: Retrograde orbits are now approved (what could possibly go wrong?)
On Apr 10, 8:33 pm, palsing <pnals...@gmail.com> wrote:

Yes but Brad claims he can easily synthesize this material into 64,000
km long fibers which exhibit tensile strengths far beyond anything
currently known to science.  Do you see the problem?

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dean  
View profile  
 More options Apr 11 2012, 8:02 am
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, sci.space.policy, sci.space.history, uk.sci.misc, alt.journalism
From: Dean <damark...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 05:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Apr 11 2012 8:02 am
Subject: Re: Retrograde orbits are now approved (what could possibly go wrong?)
On Apr 10, 8:18 pm, Brad Guth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:

I notice whenever people point out your lies/bullshit that you
immediately turn to a personal attack.  And you wonder why you are
nicknamed?

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
HVAC  
View profile  
 More options Apr 11 2012, 8:56 am
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, sci.space.policy, sci.space.history, uk.sci.misc, alt.journalism
From: HVAC <mr.h...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:56:21 -0400
Local: Wed, Apr 11 2012 8:56 am
Subject: Re: Retrograde orbits are now approved (what could possibly go wrong?)
On 4/11/2012 8:04 AM, Dean wrote:

> Yes but Brad claims he can easily synthesize this material into 64,000
> km long fibers which exhibit tensile strengths far beyond anything
> currently known to science.  Do you see the problem?

He's insane?

--
"OK you cunts, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Brad Guth  
View profile  
 More options Apr 11 2012, 11:43 am
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, sci.space.policy, sci.space.history, uk.sci.misc, alt.journalism
From: Brad Guth <bradg...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:43:11 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Apr 11 2012 11:43 am
Subject: Re: Retrograde orbits are now approved (what could possibly go wrong?)
On Apr 11, 5:02 am, Dean <damark...@gmail.com> wrote:

Because oligarchs and ZNR bully rednecks like yourself always say the
same stupid things, and expect the rest of us as your minions to
accept your words and interpretations of everything, or else.

How is that not like Hitler, GW Bush or Dick Cheney running the show?

So, do tell us, if we shut off all of our spendy satellite tracking
radars and those necessary supercomputers, how long before satellites
start encountering one another?


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Brad Guth  
View profile  
 More options Apr 11 2012, 11:45 am
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, sci.space.policy, sci.space.history, uk.sci.misc, alt.journalism
From: Brad Guth <bradg...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:45:27 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Apr 11 2012 11:45 am
Subject: Re: Retrograde orbits are now approved (what could possibly go wrong?)
On Apr 11, 5:04 am, Dean <damark...@gmail.com> wrote:

I can, or at least existing technology can, not that continuous 64,000
km fibers are necessary.

In the vacuum of space and with unlimited energy, diamond can be
created.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
HVAC  
View profile  
 More options Apr 11 2012, 12:04 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, sci.space.policy, sci.space.history, uk.sci.misc, alt.journalism
From: HVAC <mr.h...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:04:58 -0400
Local: Wed, Apr 11 2012 12:04 pm
Subject: Re: Retrograde orbits are now approved (what could possibly go wrong?)
On 4/11/2012 11:46 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:

>> Because oligarchs and ZNR bully rednecks like yourself always say the
>> same stupid things, ...

> Speaking of always saying the same stupid things, I think the
> following sentence probably covers most Guthballisms:

> "The spendy metallicity of our dark lunar carbonado is perfect for
> retrograde orbits to Venus L1."

HAHAhahahahaha!

Hey Guth...If 99% of the world thinks you are crazy, doesn't
that de facto MAKE you crazy?

--
"OK you cunts, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
HVAC  
View profile  
 More options Apr 11 2012, 12:05 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, sci.space.policy, sci.space.history, uk.sci.misc, alt.journalism
From: HVAC <mr.h...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:05:56 -0400
Local: Wed, Apr 11 2012 12:05 pm
Subject: Re: Retrograde orbits are now approved (what could possibly go wrong?)
On 4/11/2012 11:45 AM, Brad Guth wrote:

>> Yes but Brad claims he can easily synthesize this material into 64,000
>> km long fibers which exhibit tensile strengths far beyond anything
>> currently known to science.  Do you see the problem?

> I can, or at least existing technology can, not that continuous 64,000
> km fibers are necessary.

> In the vacuum of space and with unlimited energy, diamond can be
> created.

See how easy?

--
"OK you cunts, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Brad Guth  
View profile  
 More options Apr 11 2012, 2:36 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, sci.space.policy, sci.space.history, uk.sci.misc, alt.journalism
From: Brad Guth <bradg...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Apr 11 2012 2:36 pm
Subject: Re: Retrograde orbits are now approved (what could possibly go wrong?)
On Apr 11, 5:02 am, Dean <damark...@gmail.com> wrote:

Because oligarchs and their ZNR bully rednecks like yourself always
act/react and say the same stupid things, expecting the rest of us as
your personal minions to accept your words and interpretations of
everything, or else.  No doubt your parents, grandparents and great
grandparents acted/reacted in exactly the same arrogant and deceitful
ways as yourself and other dysfunctionals that see nothing wrong with
the upper 0.1% caste as oligarchs and their brown-nosed beneficiaries
getting away with murder and essentially hate crimes against humanity
and the environment, as why else would we have had the US Mexican war,
attempted to overthrow Cuba (7 times) or having perpetrated that bogus/
phony cold-war plus having created North Korea?

How is any of that not exactly like Hitler, GW Bush or Dick Cheney
running the show like a faith-based mafia would?

So, do tell us, if we shut off all of our spendy satellite tracking
radars and those necessary supercomputers that have to be kept running
24/7, how long before satellites start encountering one another
(including ISS)?

 http://groups.google.com/groups/search
 http://translate.google.com/#
 Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
HVAC  
View profile  
 More options Apr 11 2012, 2:51 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, sci.space.policy, sci.space.history, uk.sci.misc, alt.journalism
From: HVAC <mr.h...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:51:40 -0400
Local: Wed, Apr 11 2012 2:51 pm
Subject: Re: Retrograde orbits are now approved (what could possibly go wrong?)
On 4/11/2012 2:36 PM, Brad Guth wrote:

> Because oligarchs and their ZNR bully rednecks like yourself always
> act/react and say the same stupid things, expecting the rest of us as
> your personal minions to accept your words and interpretations of
> everything, or else.  No doubt your parents, grandparents and great
> grandparents acted/reacted in exactly the same arrogant and deceitful
> ways as yourself and other dysfunctionals that see nothing wrong with
> the upper 0.1% caste as oligarchs and their brown-nosed beneficiaries
> getting away with murder and essentially hate crimes against humanity
> and the environment, as why else would we have had the US Mexican war,
> attempted to overthrow Cuba (7 times) or having perpetrated that bogus/
> phony cold-war plus having created North Korea?

You said the same thing at 11:43 this morning.

Did you have another 'spell'?

--
"OK you cunts, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dean  
View profile  
 More options Apr 11 2012, 4:25 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, sci.space.policy, sci.space.history, uk.sci.misc, alt.journalism
From: Dean <damark...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Apr 11 2012 4:25 pm
Subject: Re: Retrograde orbits are now approved (what could possibly go wrong?)
On Apr 11, 11:46 am, Fred J. McCall <fjmcc...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Brad Guth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >Because oligarchs and ZNR bully rednecks like yourself always say the
> >same stupid things, ...

> Speaking of always saying the same stupid things, I think the
> following sentence probably covers most Guthballisms:

> "The spendy metallicity of our dark lunar carbonado is perfect for
> retrograde orbits to Venus L1."

> --
> "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
>  territory."
>                                       --G. Behn

LMAO!  Oh Fred, now he'll be using that!

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dean  
View profile  
 More options Apr 11 2012, 4:27 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, sci.space.policy, sci.space.history, uk.sci.misc, alt.journalism
From: Dean <damark...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Apr 11 2012 4:27 pm
Subject: Re: Retrograde orbits are now approved (what could possibly go wrong?)
On Apr 11, 11:45 am, Brad Guth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:

No you cannot.  I repeat.  You cannot.  And you are the one who said
64,000 km.  Now describe in one short paragraph how you make diamond
in the vacuum of space with unlimited energy?

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dean  
View profile  
 More options Apr 11 2012, 4:28 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, sci.space.policy, sci.space.history, uk.sci.misc, alt.journalism
From: Dean <damark...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:28:56 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Apr 11 2012 4:28 pm
Subject: Re: Retrograde orbits are now approved (what could possibly go wrong?)
On Apr 11, 2:36 pm, Brad Guth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:

Your personal attack is noted as a deflection.  Now tell us how you
make a 64,0000 km carbonado fiber in the vacuum of space using
unlimited energy?

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Brad Guth  
View profile  
 More options Apr 11 2012, 5:04 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, sci.space.policy, sci.space.history, uk.sci.misc, alt.journalism
From: Brad Guth <bradg...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Apr 11 2012 5:04 pm
Subject: Re: Retrograde orbits are now approved (what could possibly go wrong?)
On Apr 11, 1:27 pm, Dean <damark...@gmail.com> wrote:

 http://www.prlog.org/10537242-scientists-create-super-diamonds.html
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamond-like_carbon
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_vapor_deposition_of_diamond

 Are you suggesting that 1.4 kw/m2 isn't available for the taking, or
that it isn't sufficiently renewable?

Are you suggesting our physically dark moon has no carbon?

Are you suggesting there's no wandering/rogue or nomad carbon
buckyballs in space?

A m3 worth of pure carbonado/diamond could make a nifty square nano-
meter fiber 1e12 km long.

A square micro-meter fiber would only be 1e9 km. (the moon is a
distance of 3.844e5 km)

Creating those 64,000 km fibers is not going to be insurmountable.
Extruded as round fiber per m3 of diamond is going to yield more than
the square fiber I used for your basic education.

Ever heard of automation and robotics?

Are you going to suggest that extruding a diamond fiber isn't
possible?

 http://groups.google.com/groups/search
 http://translate.google.com/#
 Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
HVAC  
View profile  
 More options Apr 11 2012, 5:30 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, sci.space.policy, sci.space.history, uk.sci.misc, alt.journalism
From: HVAC <mr.h...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 17:30:40 -0400
Local: Wed, Apr 11 2012 5:30 pm
Subject: Re: Retrograde orbits are now approved (what could possibly go wrong?)
On 4/11/2012 5:04 PM, Brad Guth wrote:

>>> In the vacuum of space and with unlimited energy, diamond can be
>>> created.

>> No you cannot.  I repeat.  You cannot.  And you are the one who said
>> 64,000 km.  Now describe in one short paragraph how you make diamond
>> in the vacuum of space with unlimited energy?

Oh man...Now you've gone and sent Guth off a "Are you suggesting", rant.

--
"OK you cunts, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dean  
View profile  
 More options Apr 11 2012, 8:37 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, sci.space.policy, sci.space.history, uk.sci.misc, alt.journalism
From: Dean <damark...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 17:37:47 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Apr 11 2012 8:37 pm
Subject: Re: Retrograde orbits are now approved (what could possibly go wrong?)
On Apr 11, 5:04 pm, Brad Guth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:

Yes.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dean  
View profile  
 More options Apr 11 2012, 8:38 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, sci.space.policy, sci.space.history, uk.sci.misc, alt.journalism
From: Dean <damark...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 17:38:40 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Apr 11 2012 8:38 pm
Subject: Re: Retrograde orbits are now approved (what could possibly go wrong?)
On Apr 11, 5:30 pm, HVAC <mr.h...@gmail.com> wrote:

Yep.  Notice how he can never directly answer a question?

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Brad Guth  
View profile  
 More options Apr 11 2012, 8:57 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, sci.space.policy, sci.space.history, uk.sci.misc, alt.journalism
From: Brad Guth <bradg...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 17:57:28 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Apr 11 2012 8:57 pm
Subject: Re: Retrograde orbits are now approved (what could possibly go wrong?)
On Apr 11, 5:37 pm, Dean <damark...@gmail.com> wrote:

Obfuscation and denial of being in denial certainly has its perks,
doesn't it.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Odysseus  
View profile  
 More options Apr 11 2012, 11:06 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, sci.space.policy, sci.space.history, uk.sci.misc, alt.journalism
From: Odysseus <odysseus1479...@yahoo-dot.ca>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 21:06:24 -0600
Local: Wed, Apr 11 2012 11:06 pm
Subject: Re: Retrograde orbits are now approved (what could possibly go wrong?)
In article <nl9bo753lfsvil3m5cf0j5egc6isesq...@4ax.com>,
 Fred J. McCall <fjmcc...@gmail.com> wrote:

<snip>

> Speaking of always saying the same stupid things, I think the
> following sentence probably covers most Guthballisms:

> "The spendy metallicity of our dark lunar carbonado is perfect for
> retrograde orbits to Venus L1."

Quite a few, but to be anywhere near comprehensive you'll have to work
in at least "brown-nosed", "lithobraking", and "Zionist Nazi FUDmasters".

--
Odysseus


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Brad Guth  
View profile  
 More options Apr 11 2012, 11:50 pm
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, sci.space.policy, sci.space.history, uk.sci.misc, alt.journalism
From: Brad Guth <bradg...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Apr 11 2012 11:50 pm
Subject: Re: Retrograde orbits are now approved (what could possibly go wrong?)
On Apr 11, 8:06 pm, Odysseus <odysseus1479...@yahoo-dot.ca> wrote:

Who the hell said: "The spendy metallicity of our dark lunar carbonado
is perfect for retrograde orbits to Venus L1."

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
HVAC  
View profile  
 More options Apr 12 2012, 6:26 am
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, sci.space.policy, sci.space.history, uk.sci.misc, alt.journalism
From: HVAC <mr.h...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 06:26:36 -0400
Local: Thurs, Apr 12 2012 6:26 am
Subject: Re: Retrograde orbits are now approved (what could possibly go wrong?)
On 4/11/2012 11:06 PM, Odysseus wrote:

> In article<nl9bo753lfsvil3m5cf0j5egc6isesq...@4ax.com>,
>   Fred J. McCall<fjmcc...@gmail.com>  wrote:

> <snip>

>> Speaking of always saying the same stupid things, I think the
>> following sentence probably covers most Guthballisms:

>> "The spendy metallicity of our dark lunar carbonado is perfect for
>> retrograde orbits to Venus L1."

> Quite a few, but to be anywhere near comprehensive you'll have to work
> in at least "brown-nosed", "lithobraking", and "Zionist Nazi FUDmasters".

And while you're there, be sure to do some 'observationology'.

You might spot some of Guth's moon men running around on Venus.

--
"OK you cunts, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
HVAC  
View profile  
 More options Apr 12 2012, 6:30 am
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, sci.space.policy, sci.space.history, uk.sci.misc, alt.journalism
From: HVAC <mr.h...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 06:30:22 -0400
Local: Thurs, Apr 12 2012 6:30 am
Subject: Re: Retrograde orbits are now approved (what could possibly go wrong?)
On 4/11/2012 8:38 PM, Dean wrote:

> Yep.  Notice how he can never directly answer a question?

When called on his bullshit, Guth goes to ground and calls
the offending party a jew, a fud master, an oligarch, a ZNR,
or a combination of the above.

That's when he's in a lucid moment.

--
"OK you cunts, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Brad Guth  
View profile  
 More options Apr 12 2012, 9:46 am
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy, sci.space.policy, sci.space.history, uk.sci.misc, alt.journalism
From: Brad Guth <bradg...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 06:46:31 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Apr 12 2012 9:46 am
Subject: Re: Retrograde orbits are now approved (what could possibly go wrong?)
On Apr 11, 11:36 am, Brad Guth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:

If the radars and computers were turned off, it would only be a matter
of a few weeks or months before all sorts of seriously bad encounters
start happening, and once the first field of satellite debris gets to
expanding in all directions, the next satellite encountering a lethal
blow will not be so far off.  It'll cascade from that point on, and
the more retrograde the worse this will happen because of those
smaller bits doing a great deal more damage as they pass through other
satellites.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Messages 101 - 125 of 223 < Older  Newer >
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »