rebellion in Rainbow groups grows? Manning issues another powerful complaint against Obama
wind meer
two topics. Obama is not legally President. And Whites are getting
plenty angry. Manning himself is Black, and so automatically he is a
member of the Black group in the Rainbow Coalition of groups. Here is
the video. It is not boring!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hFiab7fjak
I am also in rebellion. One of my characteristics is that I am gay,
and that automatically makes me a member of the gay group in the
Rainbow Coalition of groups. It seems the "rebellion" has similarities
between different groups, and differences, so potentially not in
unison. But what we all have in common is that we are all starting to
react against some part of political correctness, just different
parts.
(My latest post on these google/usenet news groups is at
http://www.abwtfal.com/post8.htm . The post is against the lack of
independence, political or intellectual, in the gay group. This is
because there is a gazillion Jewish people in central top power points
within the gay group. The post has a huge list of these people and
their positions. The Jewish group has lots of ideas that everyone is
required to accept and worship. This is modern Communist
Bolshevism!!!)
Pat Magroyne
> Manning's statement is well-presented, and powerful, concentrating on
> two topics. Obama is not legally President.
But he is.
/flush/
wind meer
You're saying he is, doesn't make it so. Of course, neither does
Manning saying Obama isn't legally president make it so. And the same
applies to what I say.
I guess what we try to do is look at what varous sources are saying
and we try to put it altogether in a picture in our head.
Now something like "Obama is not legally president" (or "Obama is
legally president") - - well, we can hear one source say one of these
things and we can assume that source is correct and go on from there.
Or we look around for varous sources and what they are saying and we
can see if we can piece together something from all of that.
Online, I have found http://www.wnd.com/ seems to be the "clearing
house" for material about Obama not being legally president. I know a
lot fo people think wnd is a little strange. I would say they are
unique. But as long as you read carefully what they write, what they
present as a fact is a fact. That is my evalulation of them from my
experience.
(Some of the stuff on wnd that is pro-Israel/pro-Jewish (by ? Kline)
you must read carefully word for word, implication for implication. It
is all valid, but the impression you get from a regular reading of it
is very different from a word for word, implication for implication -
reading.)
Anyway, on wnd.com there are a number of reports of Obama lawyers
going in and stopping any investigation into some path that might shed
light on the issue of whether he is legally president. Eg people are
going to schools Obama went to and trying to get copies of his
records, but Obama's lawyers step in and prevent the releast of
records.
Also, some very high level officials, like one in California, saying
Obama is legally president and the proof and evidence is at such a
website. But it turns out, the website refers to another website which
in turn just repeats the same old stuff that has been questioned from
the start.
If he is legally president, why doesn't he let people go to his
schools and get records, etc. For God's sake, if I apply for some
measly low job, I have to get my schools to send records.
Apart from the above evidence, there is a guy I sometimes talk to in
the library, and I don't think of him as conservative (except in terms
of money). But one day he talked at great length, and apparently with
strong feeling, about lines of evidence as to why Obama was not
legally president. I was surprised at how much he talked about it. I
was surprised he had such strong feelings about the matter. He had
tons of apparently facts which he had put together in several lines of
strong evidence. He is however the kind of person in which
conversation is in one direction.
I think for me, the two most damning things toward Obama being legally
president are these. His lawyers run in and block schools that he went
to for instance, from giving records to people who want to look at
them (me: this seems quite odd for a president in America to be
doing). Second, people have actually been hassled for trying to pursue
the issue - this is what I get from time to time looking at wnd.
wind meer
is a bit strange, but in my opinion it is unique. Also, in my opinion
in some of my experiences, some of the pro Israeli etc stuff has the
characteristic I mentioned.
On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 18:40:20 -0700, wind meer <an...@jupiterworld.net>
wrote:
f.barnes
> Manning's statement is well-presented, and powerful, concentrating on
> two topics. Obama is not legally President. And Whites are getting
> plenty angry. Manning himself is Black, and so automatically he is a
> member of the Black group in the Rainbow Coalition of groups. Here is
>
> I am also in rebellion. One of my characteristics is that I am gay,
> and that automatically makes me a member of the gay group in the
> Rainbow Coalition of groups. It seems the "rebellion" has similarities
> between different groups, and differences, so potentially not in
> unison. But what we all have in common is that we are all starting to
> react against some part of political correctness, just different
> parts.
>
> independence, political or intellectual, in the gay group. This is
> because there is a gazillion Jewish people in central top power points
> within the gay group. The post has a huge list of these people and
> their positions. The Jewish group has lots of ideas that everyone is
> required to accept and worship. This is modern Communist
> Bolshevism!!!)
His "Message to Hispanics" is also quite interesting, and I think
mostly true.
Dank 110100100
> Manning's statement is well-presented, and powerful, concentrating on
> two topics. Obama is not legally President. And Whites are getting
> plenty angry. Manning himself is Black, and so automatically he is a
> member of the Black group in the Rainbow Coalition of groups. Here is
>
> I am also in rebellion. One of my characteristics is that I am gay,
> and that automatically makes me a member of the gay group in the
> Rainbow Coalition of groups.
How can being gay automatically make you a member of a gay group? I'm
gay, and I take pride in having never joined ANY organization, from
political parties to churches to gay rights groups.
> (My latest post [is] against the lack of
> independence, political or intellectual, in the gay group.
Duh, you think? AFAIK, I am the only gay American with a free mind,
the others are just brainwashed sheep who bleat whatever slogans are
fed to them by gay rights 'leaders.'
I was in San Francisco during the last election, and EVERY gay person
besides myself was a fanatical Obama worshiper. They were actually
kind of creepy, with that glassy brainwashed look in their eyes, all
bleating "O-BAAAA-MA! O-BAAAA-MA!" like retarded sheep on crack.
> This is
> because there is a gazillion Jewish people in central top power points
> within the gay group. The post has a huge list of these people and
> their positions. The Jewish group has lots of ideas that everyone is
> required to accept and worship. This is modern Communist
> Bolshevism!!!)
I'm not aware of any particular Jewish influence on the gay rights
movement. There is a definite Bolshevik influence, though, especially
when it comes to orthodoxy. Like all leftists, the gay rights
advocates want to FORCE people to think 'correctly.'
Tolerance is not enough, because even the most tolerant person can
still have his own opinions. Tolerance means 'live and let live,'
without necessarily APPROVING of what others are doing, and this is
intolerable to leftists. Intolerance WILL NOT be tolerated!!!!
- - - - - -
Some photos of the Obama Cult in San Francisco:
Obama is Watching You:
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1225/3165873930_63643758c8.jpg
Typical bumper stickers:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3239/3035996178_539ea18cc7.jpg
Obamastika:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3284/3022774232_9c1ed381bd.jpg
Castro Street on election night:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3292/3008677815_a1e687dbf4.jpg
Lining up for free Kool-Aid:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3235/3008677823_94274705e0.jpg
Obama campaign volunteers:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3023/3008677811_cc3e7809ef.jpg
Ho Ho Hope!:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3077/3151552129_c7f1a6ab7d.jpg
Yo momma:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3014/3038804817_23a29e225a.jpg
wind meer
I just watched video of Manning's statement to Hispanics. It is indeed
quite interesting. Manning is moving in new directions, both in his
address about Obama's illegality as President (what did you think of
that one statement he tucks in there, something about, I can help, if
[Whites] will have me.) and White anger, and also in new directions in
his address to Hispanics.
I claim that different groups, eg Blacks, Hispanics, Whites, need
something like their own areas, maybe their own laws and power
structure and leaders, and their own exploration according to their
own inner soul.
Getting back to Manning's statements to Hispanics, and how all the
govt help of the democrats will destroy the Hispanics people (schools,
community, etc). I can't help think of the destruction of the gay
group - I wont call it a community because in reality there is too
much variety in it. I grieve over today's destruction of the internal
environment of the gay group versus what could have been. There was so
much potential in and around the 60's. No, not the wild stuff, but
just before that. Like one evening, in a San Francisco apartment,
about 5 gay guys. And we invited a detective from the San Francisco
police department, and we were all talking, just in a plain regular
given and take.
Back then so much potential for a sane gay group, with intellectual
diversity and deepening of experience and soul.
Instead, today we have a kind of microcosm of the Jewish ethnic world.
Eternal intense victimhood. Demonization and removal of anyone who is
interested in truth and thus deviates from the party line - ie removal
of the best. Eternal suspicion and damnation of anyone that shows
anything but 200% loyalty to the party ideology, or for those outside
the gay group, eternal suspicion and damnation to anyone who does not
show 200% eternal apology and guilt before gays.
Thus, the absence of any other explorations, mentality or soul. What a
destruction. What a waste. What unhappiness.
Quite a video.
wind meer
(2) Monsters openly proclaim how good this is.
On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 23:00:14 -0400, Beavis Christ
<beavis...@budweiser.com> wrote:
>
>wind meer wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 13:18:50 -0700 (PDT), Pat Magroyne
>> <patma...@null.net> wrote:
>> >On Jul 4, 1:23 pm, wind meer <an...@jupiterworld.net> wrote:
>> >> Manning's statement is well-presented, and powerful, concentrating on
>> >> two topics. Obama is not legally President.
>> >
>> >But he is.
>>
>> You're saying he is, doesn't make it so.
>
>LMAO! We ain't the only ones sayin' it, bozo (and that's a *GROSS*
>understatement, to say the *LEAST*).
>
>Why ain't he the legal President? Cuz he got the majority of the popular
>vote? Care to try and take that to the Supreme Court?
>
>LOL! You're a fuckin' crackpot, man! But keep postin', though, cuz
>you'll be a lot of fun to fuck with. :-)