Turn OFF the stupid DMZ. That's not the correct way to do it. In
effect, it disables all the router security to that machine and opens
ALL the IP ports. Do not use the DMZ.
PCAnywhere 9 thru 12 use ports 5631 (TCP) and 5632 (UDP) for incoming
traffic. These can be changed, so please make sure your PCAnywhere is
using the default ports.
Specific instructions for the DI-524:
http://www.portforward.com/english/routers/port_forwarding/Dlink/DI-524/pcAnywhere.htm
Just copy the setup. Make sure that your client computer has either a
static IP address, or that you have setup a "reserved" DHCP address.
See the section called "static DHCP" in your router like:
http://support.dlink.com/emulators/di524/h_dhcp.html
--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831-336-2558 je...@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us
# http://802.11junk.com je...@cruzio.com
# http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS
In <1146238906.4...@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> on 28 Apr 2006
Be warned that the so-called and badly misnamed "DMZ" feature in cheap
consumer routers is (unlike *real* DMZ) a *huge* security hole. Like Jeff,
I strongly advise against using it.
--
Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR ALT.INTERNET.WIRELESS AT
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/FAQ_for_alt.internet.wireless>
I got PCanywhere to work without any DMZ. Thanks!
Now, I am trying to get Wake-up-on-LAN to work.
It works *with* DMZ, so the PC is properly configured.
I tried to set up a virtual server (like I did for PCanywhere), but
that does not help. I cannot route to port 192.168.0.255 (which would
be the broadcast-port, right?). If I route to the static port of my PC
(which is what I do for PCanywhere), nothing happens because the PC is
off.
What now? Any ideas? Thanks!
Ulrich
In <1146578050.3...@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> on 2 May 2006
Read up on Wake-on-LAN; e.g., <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wake-on-LAN>
>Now, I am trying to get Wake-up-on-LAN to work.
You might want to search alt.internet.wireless with Google Groups for
previous postings on WOL. See:
| http://groups.google.com/group/alt.internet.wireless/browse_frm/thread/bd1506b7d612d4b1/09220f22ed7fc996
| http://groups.google.com/group/alt.internet.wireless/browse_frm/thread/1b4d2d9a8e274f7b/23b334192093101a
Note that WOL is not directly supported by the router and that
trickery is required to make it work.
--
Jeff Liebermann je...@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
> Note that WOL is not directly supported by the router and that
> trickery is required to make it work.
well, that's where I am at now.
I have two WOL-programs that both work if I am "inside" of the router's
firewall (I brought my Laptop to work to try it out; it woke up the
office PC perfectely).
BUT: If I try sending the magic packet via the internet (which worked
fine with my previous router, a Netgear, where I could set the rule to
route magic packets on port 7 to subnet broadcast 192.168.0.255),
nothing happens. The new router does not allow me to set the broadcast
(no virtual servers for the *.*.*.255).
Do you have any ideas for the required trickery? :-)
Thanks, Ulrich
In <1147116300.8...@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> on 8 May 2006
Try:
* Configuring the PC with a fixed IP address
* Using a static route in the DI-524
>> Note that WOL is not directly supported by the router and that
>> trickery is required to make it work.
>well, that's where I am at now.
The trickery is not in the router. It's in the WOL originating
program.
>I have two WOL-programs that both work if I am "inside" of the router's
>firewall (I brought my Laptop to work to try it out; it woke up the
>office PC perfectely).
Which programs? Did you try this one I recommended?
http://www.depicus.com/wake-on-lan/wake-on-lan-gui.aspx
>BUT: If I try sending the magic packet via the internet (which worked
>fine with my previous router, a Netgear, where I could set the rule to
>route magic packets on port 7 to subnet broadcast 192.168.0.255),
>nothing happens. The new router does not allow me to set the broadcast
>(no virtual servers for the *.*.*.255).
>
>Do you have any ideas for the required trickery? :-)
It's called "magic" packet for a reason. Getting it to work requires
a bit of magic.
There's no guarantee that your router will port forward port 7 to
whatever you're using for a client computah. I suggest you pick
another random port, over 1024, and port forward it to the IP address
of your test client computah (not the entire IP block). You will need
to setup a "reserved DHCP address" or "static IP address" for this
computah as you don't want the IP to change later.
Then try using:
http://www.depicus.com/wake-on-lan/woli.aspx
http://www.dslreports.com/wakeup?r=692
to test your WOL function from the internet. I have it working on
about 6 different cheapo routers without much difficulty. My favorite
mistake is using the wrong MAC address. I haven't tried this one:
http://www.moldaner.de/wakeonlan/wakeonlan.html
but it looks interesting.
It would be interesting to know which model Netgear worked for you in
the past where which allows you to port forward a port to an entire
Class C IP block. Every other router I've seen only allows port
forwarding to a single IP address (per entry). Also, harware
mutations and firmware version if available.
I have set up a "static DHCP client" with the right MAC address (been
there, done that, checked it twice this time).
I also have set up a port forwarding from a high port to my "static" IP
address.
So far, so good. I have to try the WOL-part of it tonight, though,
because I am sitting in front of my office PC (who should be woken)
right now.
What I don't get is: Even if I have a static IP address, so far it does
not work because the PC is off and so the router "forgets" about it,
right? So the static IP address will only see to the PC getting the
same IP address everytime it's on -- but there is no static route when
it's off, because there is no route at all. Or is there??
I have tried the Depicus-program. That's the one that worked before
with my Netgear router, so the program is great.
My Netgear router was a FWG114P, I had v1 and v2, always upgraded the
Firmware first, both worked fine regarding the WOL (because you can
port forward to broadcast). On the other hand, the DynDNS-service did
not work properly, it lost interest in updating the IP address after
about five days...
Now DynDNS works fine, but WOL doesn't (so far).
I'll keep you posted.
Thanks so far.
Ulrich
>What I don't get is: Even if I have a static IP address, so far it does
>not work because the PC is off and so the router "forgets" about it,
>right? So the static IP address will only see to the PC getting the
>same IP address everytime it's on -- but there is no static route when
>it's off, because there is no route at all. Or is there??
Do you have control over the office DI-524 router?
You have a good point. There's no ARP table entry in the router if
the PC is turned off. RARP (reverse ARP) will work if the router
supports it. I don't think it does. Let's try this a bit
differently.
1. Leave your PC set to DHCP assigned IP address, not static. Assign
a "static DHCP" IP address to your client computer in the DI-524:
http://support.dlink.com/emulators/di524/h_dhcp.html
At the bottom of the page. Note that the IP is defined by the PC's
MAC address. This will insure that the router ARP table is
permanently populated with your PC's MAC and IP address when it's
turned off.
2. Port forward some high numbered port to your PC's IP.
http://support.dlink.com/emulators/di524/adv_virtual.html
This port forwarding is permanent and does not change whether the PC
is on or off.
>I have tried the Depicus-program. That's the one that worked before
>with my Netgear router, so the program is great.
That's the one I use. I also use the web based versions when I don't
have the program handy.
>My Netgear router was a FWG114P, I had v1 and v2, always upgraded the
>Firmware first, both worked fine regarding the WOL (because you can
>port forward to broadcast).
Amazing. I'll have to try that.
>On the other hand, the DynDNS-service did
>not work properly, it lost interest in updating the IP address after
>about five days...
>Now DynDNS works fine, but WOL doesn't (so far).
I've had the same problem with a few routers with built in DDOS
clients. They just seem to go comatose after a few days. On the
"does not work" list are, DI-604 rev c1, WGR-614v5 and v6, and DI-514.
I ended up using the DynDNS Windoze client on the PC, which works well
enough. DynDNS is trying to get vendors to certify clients, but the
small number of certified routers is not impressive:
http://www.dyndns.com/support/clients/hardware/
Keep trying. It should work, eventually.
In <0h7162tlcqngd6a5k...@4ax.com> on Tue, 09 May 2006 07:10:07
-0700, Jeff Liebermann <je...@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us> wrote:
>"UH" <jeen...@web.de> hath wroth:
>
>>What I don't get is: Even if I have a static IP address, so far it does
>>not work because the PC is off and so the router "forgets" about it,
>>right? So the static IP address will only see to the PC getting the
>>same IP address everytime it's on -- but there is no static route when
>>it's off, because there is no route at all. Or is there??
>
>Do you have control over the office DI-524 router?
>
>You have a good point. There's no ARP table entry in the router if
>the PC is turned off. RARP (reverse ARP) will work if the router
>supports it. I don't think it does. Let's try this a bit
>differently.
>
>1. Leave your PC set to DHCP assigned IP address, not static. Assign
>a "static DHCP" IP address to your client computer in the DI-524:
> http://support.dlink.com/emulators/di524/h_dhcp.html
>At the bottom of the page. Note that the IP is defined by the PC's
>MAC address. This will insure that the router ARP table is
>permanently populated with your PC's MAC and IP address when it's
>turned off.
Not necessarily (usually not) -- what's also needed (as I wrote) is a
*static route* in the DI-524 to that IP address.
In <1147169033....@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> on 9 May 2006
03:03:53 -0700, "UH" <jeen...@web.de> wrote:
>Hi Jeff,
>hi John,
>
>I have set up a "static DHCP client" with the right MAC address (been
>there, done that, checked it twice this time).
>
>I also have set up a port forwarding from a high port to my "static" IP
>address.
>
>So far, so good. I have to try the WOL-part of it tonight, though,
>because I am sitting in front of my office PC (who should be woken)
>right now.
Not so good. You also need a *static route* in the DI-524 to that
static IP address.
>What I don't get is: Even if I have a static IP address, so far it does
>not work because the PC is off and so the router "forgets" about it,
>right?
Right.
>So the static IP address will only see to the PC getting the
>same IP address everytime it's on -- but there is no static route when
>it's off, because there is no route at all. Or is there??
There's only a static route if you add it to the router.
In <1147169033....@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> on 9 May 2006
03:03:53 -0700, "UH" <jeen...@web.de> wrote:
>[SNIP]
p.s. See "Wake On LAN - An Overview"
<http://www.camden411.com/tcpipfaq/wol.html>
I have tried Jeff's suggestion -- unfortunately, it didn't work.
D-Link support states (quickly, at least): No, WOL will not work.
I can remote control the router, but he will not route to anything
turned off... too bad.
Thank you both very much for your help. At least I learned a lot. :-)
I'll have to sell this router and buy I new one, I fear. :-(
Any suggestions (to get out of your hair) for a good one. The only
features I actually need are: print server (USB), remote manegemnt,
Wlan, Routing for PCanywhere, WOL (broadcast to *.*.*.255),
DynDNS-service. Shouldn't be too hard to build...
Thanks again, and have a wonderful sunday!
Ulrich
In <1147548824.6...@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> on 13 May 2006
12:33:44 -0700, "UH" <jeen...@web.de> wrote:
>I have tried Jeff's suggestion -- unfortunately, it didn't work.
>
>D-Link support states (quickly, at least): No, WOL will not work.
>
>I can remote control the router, but he will not route to anything
>turned off... too bad.
I think that's right -- I checked the DI-524 Manual, and there's no support
for static routes/directed broadcasts. That's not surprising, because
directed-broadcasts is a security risk (Smurf attacks) and isn't of much
interest to the home market in any event. Thus you'll normally find this only
in more sophisticated products
>Thank you both very much for your help. At least I learned a lot. :-)
>
>I'll have to sell this router and buy I new one, I fear. :-(
>
>Any suggestions (to get out of your hair) for a good one. The only
>features I actually need are: print server (USB), remote manegemnt,
>Wlan, Routing for PCanywhere, WOL (broadcast to *.*.*.255),
>DynDNS-service. Shouldn't be too hard to build...
Buffalo AirStation 125 High-Speed Mode Wireless Secure Remote Gateway
<http://www.buffalotech.com/products/product-detail.php?productid=88>
Explicit Wake-On-LAN feature
I bought the Buffalo AirStation. Thanks for the tip. The Wake-On-LAN
seems to work (though you have to log on the the AirStation to use it).
Strangely, though, I do not find any way to get PCanywhere to work.
Same scenario: I need to route the ports through to my PC... But
everything is called differently with the Airstation. Do you happen to
have it yourself? If not, I'll fiddle around with it until I stumble
upon the solution, but if you do... well, you could tell me, where to
look. ;-)
Thanks,
Ulrich
In <1148568293....@j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> on 25 May 2006
Don't have one myself. You might want to contact Tech Support.
>I bought the Buffalo AirStation.
Model number of AirStation?
>Strangely, though, I do not find any way to get PCanywhere to work.
http://www.portforward.com/english/routers/port_forwarding/Buffalo/WBR-G54/pcAnywhere.htm
I guessed at the model number. Start from the main page if I guessed
wrong. Be sure to either use a static IP address for your
workstation, *OR* use "static DHCP" or "preassigned DHCP" to create
the same unchangeable IP using the router configuration.
pcANYHWERE host on your LAN
IN TCP 5631
IN UDP 5632
i do not use pcanywhere i use VNC much more easy to use with my
di-624