Google Page Rank 10 list
Ganesh J Acharya
http://www.seashellwebs.com/google-PR-10-list.asp
I am looking out to put more websites those are currently google page
rank 10.
-->If you know any please update with the same.
Also, I am trying to find the reasons those are responsible to get a
Google PR 10.
-->If you know any more than the below ones please state them...
1. High Incoming backlinks.
Also, I am trying to find what facilities does a website get after
getting a Google PR 10??
1. Content change in a website gets crawled in a short duration (Less
than 12 Hours, is what I speculate)
Thanks!
Ganesh J. Acharya
--->If you know them please specify.
The Gobbling Goblin
<ganeshj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I've just updated the Google Page Rank 10 list at my website..
what a waste of time that was. No use whatsoever.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
The Gobbling Goblin
>I am looking out to put more websites those are currently google page
>rank 10.
Why, your site is is SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO spammy, you'll never get
there.
You haven't quite grasped SEO yet have you.
Andrew Heenan
> I've just updated the Google Page Rank 10 list at my website..
> getting a Google PR 10??
> 1. Content change in a website gets crawled in a short duration (Less
> than 12 Hours, is what I speculate)
More frequent spidering is not proportional to page rank, it's a matter of
how frequently the site normally updates.
Once a quality site has gained a reputation for being updated a lot, it will
get spidered a lot - many news sites and blogs get that with a page rank of
3 or 4.
But try not to obsess over page rank; it is one of 200+ factors considered
by Google,and what you see and what you avidly copy, is already 3 months+
out of date.
What matters is being found for appropriate terms, and good old fashioned
ROI
--
Andrew
http://www.seo2seo.com/
http://www.sick-site-syndrome.com/
First things first - but not necessarily in that order.
The video that makes YouTube worthwhile:
Charlie The Unicorn - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5im0Ssyyus
canadafred
> Also, I am trying to find what facilities does a website get after
> getting a Google PR 10??
What does a website get after getting a PR10 ... hmmm ... probably has
to start back at PR0 I s'pose
Big Bill
wrote:
>"Ganesh J Acharya" wrote...
>> I've just updated the Google Page Rank 10 list at my website..
>> Also, I am trying to find what facilities does a website get after
>> getting a Google PR 10??
>> 1. Content change in a website gets crawled in a short duration (Less
>> than 12 Hours, is what I speculate)
>
>More frequent spidering is not proportional to page rank, it's a matter of
>how frequently the site normally updates.
I've heard different, actually. I wouldn't swear either way, but I've
heard different.
BB
--
http://www.kruse.co.uk/
http://www.fat-odin.com/
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/
Ganesh J Acharya
> there.
Well, do you think I will not correct it.. Any way how did you say it
was spammy???? You mean to say using repeated "Search Engine
Marketing" at all the anchor text is spam? Can you show me that is
spam written anywhere by anyone?
Is that text actually misguiding the viewer? No
Is that text actually make it tough for the visitor to find a place of
their choise. Yes
This was a problem with my developer. I have this site live for the
last 4 years. Since the time I started with SEO....
Well now tell me if I suddenly change all the anchor text. Will that
not effect the rankings?
Thanks!
Ganesh J. Acharya
http://www.seashellwebs.com
Ganesh J Acharya
> last 4 years. Since the time I started with SEO....
>
> Well now tell me if I suddenly change all the anchor text. Will that
> not effect the rankings?
I know it looks really foolish to have those real-long anchor texts
out there. But, I cannot immeadiately change that as I really do not
know how that will effect the rankings.
It loooks tedious thought it is not a spam, what ever is there on the
website is clearly seen to you all.. It would be a spam only if I
misguide you viewers :-)
Thanks!
Ganesh J. Acharya
Ganesh J Acharya
Plus .. it will need me to spend a day or two behind correcting that
code.. I did not code that entirely. I hired a starter to do that..
Now.. it is a long while I have been coding.. it's very painful and
there's very less time with me.. here.....
Ganesh J Acharya
I am not that bad.. either....
you can check with
http://www.yagnampulverizer.net if you really want to judge my updated
skills.
Ganesh
The Gobbling Goblin
<ganeshj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Why, your site is is SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO spammy, you'll never get
>> there.
>
>Well, do you think I will not correct it..
Do you think it should have gone live in that state ?
>Any way how did you say it was spammy???? You mean to say using repeated "Search Engine
>Marketing" at all the anchor text is spam?
Yes
>Can you show me that is spam written anywhere by anyone?
eh ?
>Is that text actually misguiding the viewer? No
But you are making it for search engines by the look of it and not the
viewer.
The viewer would soon leave.
And seeing that most have ZERO entries, wouldn't it be wise to remove
some/most of them ?
Really, how many Search Engine Marketing Northern Mariana Islands are
you expecting to get ? Or Search Engine Marketing Solomon Islands ??
Come on, get real.
>Is that text actually make it tough for the visitor to find a place of
>their choise. Yes
most certainly.
Will it drive away visitors. Most certainly.
>This was a problem with my developer. I have this site live for the
>last 4 years. Since the time I started with SEO....
And you have let this go on for 4 years ?
And after 4 years it is PR3 ?
>Well now tell me if I suddenly change all the anchor text. Will that
>not effect the rankings?
Oh, you really want to target Search Engine Marketing Solomon Islands
- BIG SERP that is.... NOT.
>Thanks!
>Ganesh J. Acharya
>http://www.seashellwebs.com
--
Beaded Necklace : http://www.houstoncrafts.com/beaded/necklaces-201.html
Gemstone Choker : http://www.houstoncrafts.com/gemstone/choker-302.html
Beaded Choker : http://www.houstoncrafts.com/beaded/chokers-302.html
The Gobbling Goblin
<ganeshj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I know it looks really foolish to have those real-long anchor texts
>out there.
Correct.
>But, I cannot immeadiately change that
How long will it take to alter 1 page ?
Sheesh, I have already re-written 40 pages today myself.
>as I really do not know how that will effect the rankings.
Rankings for what ?
Search Engine Marketing Solomon Islands ? LMAO
And another thing to think about. Half of those Countries will be in
their own language. So most people from Vietnam, will be searching for
it in Vietnamese and not in English. Same for French, Dutch, Germany
etc etc
You are looking at SERPS in the wrong way. And who actually targets
those poor SERPS ?
>It loooks tedious thought it is not a spam, what ever is there on the
>website is clearly seen to you all.. It would be a spam only if I
>misguide you viewers :-)
AND search Engines.
>Thanks!
>Ganesh J. Acharya
--
Beaded Necklace : http://www.houstoncrafts.com/beaded/necklaces-201.html
Gemstone Choker : http://www.houstoncrafts.com/gemstone/choker-302.html
Beaded Choker : http://www.houstoncrafts.com/beaded/chokers-302.html
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
The Gobbling Goblin
<ganeshj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I am not that bad.. either....
at what ?
It's not at spelling, that's for sure.
Home page has "ecnomically" twice.
It isn't at coding as it contains errors.
The site has been registered for 3 years and it is PR1, so it cannot
be SEO that you are good at either.
You have pointless code in there too
<meta name="robots" content="all,follow" />
<meta name="description" content="..." />
<meta name="keywords" content="..." />
And the best bit is that you give a rel="nofollow" link to your
seashellwebs site. LOL
Please excuse me, I have more important things to do as I have wasted
enough time on this.
plh
Paul
>you can check with
>
>http://www. yagnampulverizer.net if you really want to judge my updated
>skills.
--
Beaded Necklace : http://www.houstoncrafts.com/beaded/necklaces-201.html
Gemstone Choker : http://www.houstoncrafts.com/gemstone/choker-302.html
Beaded Choker : http://www.houstoncrafts.com/beaded/chokers-302.html
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
Ganesh J Acharya
> >last 4 years. Since the time I started with SEO....
>
> And you have let this go on for 4 years ?
> And after 4 years it is PR3 ?
Well, look buddy it's the client's site what I really head on. I
hardly have time for myself. I know this site's lot buggy. But, right
now I am not trying to sell myself a lot. Hope, I get that corrected.
That's there in my todo's for a real long time.
Thanks for your real great inputs.....
Ganesh
Ganesh J Acharya
> <meta name="robots" content="all,follow" />
> <meta name="description" content="..." />
> <meta name="keywords" content="..." />
>
ittttt SNEEKED OUT.. wELL WAIT... i CANNOT SHOW YOU A 100% GOOD
WEBSITE BECAUSE OF TOS with people.
you have a hauks eye for sure..
See I did maintain some good design aesthetics here. I did work on
many things. I've corrected that blunder. thanks for pointing that
out.
Ganesh
Ganesh J Acharya
I did this website on a part-time basis, I cannot say no to this
client as he's my friend, believe I've charged him peanuts for that
work.... I work else where.
Again, I am here to do some research. I tried that with SEW,
surprisingly they deleted my too detailed queries.
I got a big list here (http://www.vaughns-1-pagers.com/internet/google-
ranking-factors.htm) that's a lot in details. Which I normally apply
with my projects.
Ganesh J Acharya
<customerservi...@houstoncrafts.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 03:18:41 -0800 (PST), Ganesh J Acharya
>
> >I know it looks really foolish to have those real-long anchor texts
> >out there.
>
> Correct.
>
> >But, I cannot immeadiately change that
>
> How long will it take to alter 1 page ?
> Sheesh, I have already re-written 40 pages today myself.
>
It's not a HTML text... buddy. I will need to change the entire
software, I will need to check all the resultant implications of the
same. I will need to change the parameters I've set years ago.
Let me check if I've a short work around to fix that.......
I am crossing my fingers, I currently have over 300 pages indexed...
I hope I do not loose all those..
But, I'll try, it's a real long time that website out there that way.
Thanks for your inputs.
Ganesh J. Acharya
Ganesh J Acharya
> "Ganesh J Acharya" wrote...
>
> > I've just updated the Google Page Rank 10 list at my website..
> > Also, I am trying to find what facilities does a website get after
> > getting a Google PR 10??
> > 1. Content change in a website gets crawled in a short duration (Less
> > than 12 Hours, is what I speculate)
>
> More frequent spidering is not proportional to page rank, it's a matter of
> how frequently the site normally updates.
>
> Once a quality site has gained a reputation for being updated a lot, it will
> get spidered a lot - many news sites and blogs get that with a page rank of
> 3 or 4.
>
Has any one researched with this in detail. Do you know any books out
there, any research white papers?
Ganesh J. Acharya
Ganesh J Acharya
> On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 13:51:12 GMT, "Andrew Heenan" <andr...@heenan.net>
> wrote:
>
> >"Ganesh J Acharya" wrote...
> >> I've just updated the Google Page Rank 10 list at my website..
> >> Also, I am trying to find what facilities does a website get after
> >> getting a Google PR 10??
> >> 1. Content change in a website gets crawled in a short duration (Less
> >> than 12 Hours, is what I speculate)
>
> >More frequent spidering is not proportional to page rank, it's a matter of
> >how frequently the site normally updates.
>
> I've heard different, actually. I wouldn't swear either way, but I've
> heard different.
??? If you can provide details, it will be a lot helpful...
Also I am trying to group up a team to do some useful analysis. The
data will be shared with everyone who participates. It's a real pain
doing things alone.
Let me know if anyone's interested.
Thanks!
Ganesh J. Acharya
Ganesh J Acharya
> wrote:
>
> >"Ganesh J Acharya" wrote...
> >> I've just updated the Google Page Rank 10 list at my website..
> >> Also, I am trying to find what facilities does a website get after
> >> getting a Google PR 10??
> >> 1. Content change in a website gets crawled in a short duration (Less
> >> than 12 Hours, is what I speculate)
>
> >More frequent spidering is not proportional to page rank, it's a matter of
> >how frequently the site normally updates.
>
> I've heard different, actually. I wouldn't swear either way, but I've
> heard different.
??? If you can provide details, it will be a lot helpful...
Ganesh J Acharya
> wrote:
>
> >"Ganesh J Acharya" wrote...
> >> I've just updated the Google Page Rank 10 list at my website..
> >> Also, I am trying to find what facilities does a website get after
> >> getting a Google PR 10??
> >> 1. Content change in a website gets crawled in a short duration (Less
> >> than 12 Hours, is what I speculate)
>
> >More frequent spidering is not proportional to page rank, it's a matter of
> >how frequently the site normally updates.
>
> I've heard different, actually. I wouldn't swear either way, but I've
> heard different.
??? If you can provide details, it will be a lot helpful...
Andrew Heenan
> Again, I am here to do some research. I tried that with SEW,
> surprisingly they deleted my too detailed queries.
If you'd read their TOS, it wouldn't have been a surprise ... but then, if
you'd read their TOS, you'd probably have done different.
Ganesh J Acharya
> "Ganesh J Acharya" wrote
>
> > Again, I am here to do some research. I tried that with SEW,
> > surprisingly they deleted my too detailed queries.
>
> If you'd read their TOS, it wouldn't have been a surprise ... but then, if
> you'd read their TOS, you'd probably have done different.
> --
>
> First things first - but not necessarily in that order.
>
> The video that makes YouTube worthwhile:
> Charlie The Unicorn -http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5im0Ssyyus
I tried 2 catch u over email.. could not reach you....