Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

FREE Movie for Dittoheads

0 views
Skip to first unread message

America the Stupid

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 10:07:33 PM11/24/09
to
National Geographic - Six Degrees That Could Change The World

This is to raise awareness of Climate Change that will trouble us in the
future.

http://www.veoh.com/browse/videos/category/educational_and_howto/watch/v18541279GA4yQYwh#

If you don't watch this, shut the fuck up repeating Limbaugh lies because he
covets Al Gore.


America the Stupid

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 8:56:43 AM11/25/09
to

"Straightarrow" <hoofhe...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:47442402-d190-4fb9...@r24g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 25, 1:11 am, "America the Stupid" <stu...@tamerica.net> wrote:
> "bvallely" <bvall...@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> news:390f0964-cfe2-465e...@u18g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
> .> Translation: I'm stupid and I'm staying stupid.>
>
> .http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274870488840457454773092498...
>
> Wall Street Journal: Global Warming With the Lid Off
> The emails that reveal an effort to hide the truth about climate
> science.
>
> 'The two MMs have been after the CRU station data for years. If they
> ever hear there is a Freedom of Information Act now in the U.K., I
> think I'll delete the file rather than send to anyone. . . . We also
> have a data protection act, which I will hide behind."
>
> So apparently wrote Phil Jones, director of the University of East
> Anglia's Climate Research Unit (CRU) and one of the world's leading
> climate scientists, in a 2005 email to "Mike." Judging by the email
> thread, this refers to Michael Mann, director of the Pennsylvania
> State University's Earth System Science Center. We found this nugget
> among the more than 3,000 emails and documents released last week
> after CRU's servers were hacked and messages among some of the world's
> most influential climatologists were published on the Internet.
>
> The "two MMs" are almost certainly Stephen McIntyre and Ross
> McKitrick, two Canadians who have devoted years to seeking the raw
> data and codes used in climate graphs and models, then fact-checking
> the published conclusions�a painstaking task that strikes us as a
> public and scientific service. Mr. Jones did not return requests for
> comment and the university said it could not confirm that all the
> emails were authentic, though it acknowledged its servers were hacked.
>
> Yet even a partial review of the emails is highly illuminating. In
> them, scientists appear to urge each other to present a "unified" view
> on the theory of man-made climate change while discussing the
> importance of the "common cause"; to advise each other on how to
> smooth over data so as not to compromise the favored hypothesis; to
> discuss ways to keep opposing views out of leading journals; and to
> give tips on how to "hide the decline" of temperature in certain
> inconvenient data.
>
> Some of those mentioned in the emails have responded to our requests
> for comment by saying they must first chat with their lawyers. Others
> have offered legal threats and personal invective. Still others have
> said nothing at all. Those who have responded have insisted that the
> emails reveal nothing more than trivial data discrepancies and
> procedural debates.
>
> Yet all of these nonresponses manage to underscore what may be the
> most revealing truth: That these scientists feel the public doesn't
> have a right to know the basis for their climate-change predictions,
> even as their governments prepare staggeringly expensive legislation
> in response to them.
>
> Consider the following note that appears to have been sent by Mr.
> Jones to Mr. Mann in May 2008: "Mike, Can you delete any emails you
> may have had with Keith re AR4? Keith will do likewise. . . . Can you
> also email Gene and get him to do the same?" AR4 is shorthand for the
> U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change's (IPCC) Fourth
> Assessment Report, presented in 2007 as the consensus view on how bad
> man-made climate change has supposedly become.
> Read a Selection of the Emails
>
> Climate Science and Candor
>
> In another email that seems to have been sent in September 2007 to
> Eugene Wahl of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's
> Paleoclimatology Program and to Caspar Ammann of the National Center
> for Atmospheric Research's Climate and Global Dynamics Division, Mr.Jones
> writes: "[T]ry and change the Received date! Don't give those
>
> skeptics something to amuse themselves with."
>
> When deleting, doctoring or withholding information didn't work, Mr.
> Jones suggested an alternative in an August 2008 email to Gavin
> Schmidt of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, copied to Mr.
> Mann. "The FOI [Freedom of Information] line we're all using is this,"
> he wrote. "IPCC is exempt from any countries FOI�the skeptics have
> been told this. Even though we . . . possibly hold relevant info the
> IPCC is not part of our remit (mission statement, aims etc) therefore
> we don't have an obligation to pass it on."
>
> It also seems Mr. Mann and his friends weren't averse to blacklisting
> scientists who disputed some of their contentions, or journals that
> published their work. "I think we have to stop considering 'Climate
> Research' as a legitimate peer-reviewed journal," goes one email,
> apparently written by Mr. Mann to several recipients in March 2003.
> "Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research
> community to no longer submit to, or cite papers in, this journal."
>
> Mr. Mann's main beef was that the journal had published several
> articles challenging aspects of the anthropogenic theory of global
> warming.
>
> For the record, when we've asked Mr. Mann in the past about the charge
> that he and his colleagues suppress opposing views, he has said he
> "won't dignify that question with a response." Regarding our most
> recent queries about the hacked emails, he says he "did not manipulate
> any data in any conceivable way," but he otherwise refuses to answer
> specific questions. For the record, too, our purpose isn't to gainsay
> the probity of Mr. Mann's work, much less his right to remain silent.
>
> However, we do now have hundreds of emails that give every appearance
> of testifying to concerted and coordinated efforts by leading
> climatologists to fit the data to their conclusions while attempting
> to silence and discredit their critics. In the department of
> inconvenient truths, this one surely deserves a closer look by the
> media, the U.S. Congress and other investigative bodies.
> =========================
>
> Doesn't mean squat. These scientists are under fire by religious nuts.
> The movie I posted has nothing to do with these groups.

Why would "religious nuts" care about global warming?? HUH??
================

DUH! Global warming disputes some of their literal interpretations in their
Bible, certainly the age of the Earth and the Universe for one.
People were tortured and murdered in the middle ages by Catholics for
professing the Earth to be non-flat.
Galileo was arrested and nearly killed. He recanted and stated, "Yes, the
Earth is flat and is the center of the Universe... extra pepperoni on that,
to go, Luigi".


America the Stupid

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 8:59:18 AM11/25/09
to

"Straightarrow" <hoofhe...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bbf3384a-739d-44f7...@e23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 24, 10:23 pm, Freestyle <brist...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 24, 11:12 pm, "f. barnes" <fre...@centurytel.net> wrote:

>
> > On Nov 24, 9:07 pm, "America the Stupid" <stu...@tamerica.net> wrote:
>
> > > National Geographic - Six Degrees That Could Change The World
>
> > > This is to raise awareness of Climate Change that will trouble us in
> > > the
> > > future.
>
> > >http://www.veoh.com/browse/videos/category/educational_and_howto/watc...

>
> > > If you don't watch this, shut the fuck up repeating Limbaugh lies
> > > because he
> > > covets Al Gore.
>
> > Let's all help the Algore get richer.
>
> You dumbfucks just keep spewing your shit.
>
> Al Gore gave away every dime he made from the books and movie.
>
I suppose that's how Dr.Gore left office in 2000 a mere millionaire
and while Bush was President Dr.Gore made over $100 million. Who paid
for that huge mansion he lives in?? The Arabs? Chinese? George Soros??


> Watch Al tear Dumbitch Republicon Rep Blackburn a new poopshute when
> she implies he's for profit:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5A6h6r7qaY

no thanks.
============

Dr. Gore also owns a very popular satellite channel called 'Currents'. I
get it on DirecTV dish.


0 new messages