Sirhan Sirhan now claims he was hypnotized without his knowledge or consent into shooting at RFK but says he did not do the actual killing since he wasn't close enough to have fired at the back of Kennedy's head. Is it possible to hypnotize someone without their knowledge or consent into shooting someone?
"I can't believe Clark Kent didn't come to Superman's funeral" Lois Lane
"The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free, and good men die like dogs. There's also a negative side." Hunter S. Thompson -----------------------------------------------------------------
Janatrude wrote: > Sirhan Sirhan now claims he was hypnotized without his knowledge or consent > into shooting at RFK but says he did not do the actual killing since he wasn't > close enough to have fired at the back of Kennedy's head. > Is it possible to hypnotize someone without their knowledge or consent into > shooting someone?
I must disclose that I have only seen the original movie with the supporting role by Frank Sinatra, and have not read the book. ==================================================================
How to make a Manchurian Candidate.
{I am going to assume the candidate is male. It is quite possible for female. However, it's a hell of a lot easier to write with only one gender in mind.}
Here is how I would do it.
First off, we need the ideal subject, someone who wasn't planning on being in the military -- it was never his life-long dream -- but once there, the soldier turned out to be really excellent at it. The reason this is ideal is that we're going to build two diametrically opposite belief systems in this individual: One where the person maintains that he's opposed to unnecessary violence, and one where he's exceptionally excellent at delivering what is perceived by others as violence, but he does not perceive it as anything more than following orders.
The conditioning would be better if the subject were willing. However, as the movie goes, the conditioning comes to a person who was not willing.
There are four ways to get someone into a subconscious state (SODA: Shock, Overload, Deception, Anticipatory). To move this person into a subconscious state without his permission, we will begin with overload.
The candidate will have to be run by someone who is perceived as a superior officer. In this way, the person is already conditioned to follow orders, which is a requirement of the military.
Now, overload begins with tasks that require both physical and mental concentration. By compounding the tasks so that there are more and more demands placed on this same individual, what happens is that the person, at some point, will discover that he can't consciously concentrate on maintaining all the tasks all at once, so he slips into a subconscious state, which easily processes all the tasks, but then becomes more susceptable to control, especially if he's unaware that he's shifted from a conscious state to a subconscious state (the easiest way I know is that my perception of time shifts)
For example, give the candidate a crash course in shapes, textures and colors of paint, as well as a symbolic interpretation of each shape of sign and the underlying meaning of colors. This is to create a foundation of chaos. Next, put the candidate on a march that runs an inevitable lap, so that the starting point and ending point is the same. Put a set of headphones on the candidate so you can give additional orders to the person while he's marching, as well as two CCD video cameras, one to watch his face at all times and the other to watch where's going. We need this to watch for signs that the person is passing into a subconscious state, as well as knowing where in the field the person is
Around this track, you will need to place pictures, billboards, symbols and other visual distractions. There must be an odd number of signs, less than a hundred, and prime. In this way, there's no actual pattern the person can use to break the strides into exact steps between signs and the parameters of the overall march. This adds stress. I would recommend no less than 53 signs nor more than 83. Have these signs in all forms of shapes, colors, and messages. Have only eleven of the messages infer the mindset you want your killer to believe.
As the runner goes around the lap the first time, do not make any reference to the signs for over half of the lap, then demand that the candidate count all of the yellow signs with blue lettering that have the word "refrain" in them. Next, just as the person gets to the starting line, add the next command, and when he gets past just five signs, add the next, and the next, while commanding that the person will get tested at the end of the run. What we're going to do is to program him from a suggestion of individual words that he's picking out of these signs. Thus, anyone looking at the messages will see nothing out of the ordinary in the messages, but our candidate will be asked to find each of these words over the course of the run "Refrain, from, questioning, authority..." and whatever message you want delivered to most tweak the ultimate mindset of your killer.
At some point, the person will hit overload. At that point, the person's eyelids will flutter, and then this candidate will go into automatic pilot, for the majority of the candidate's mind will go into a hibernation state while the physical demands will remain in motion.
It is at this point where the actual programming can begin.
Does anyone have an interest in this thread? From here, there are many levels of conditioning that need to take place, mostly from the invocation of imagination as a vivid and vital tool of reprogramming, but it would take a bit of writing. If there's no interest, I don't want to waste my time.
Let me know.
Peace,
Dave Brager dibra...@NOSPAMverizon.net scrypnosis.com
"David Brager" <d.bra...@NOSPAMverizon.net> wrote in message
news:yxsRc.5330$114.3006@nwrddc02.gnilink.net... I must disclose that I have only seen the original movie with the supporting role by Frank Sinatra, and have not read the book. ==================================================================
How to make a Manchurian Candidate.
{I am going to assume the candidate is male. It is quite possible for female. However, it's a hell of a lot easier to write with only one gender in mind.}
Here is how I would do it.
First off, we need the ideal subject, someone who wasn't planning on being in the military -- it was never his life-long dream -- but once there, the soldier turned out to be really excellent at it. The reason this is ideal is that we're going to build two diametrically opposite belief systems in this individual: One where the person maintains that he's opposed to unnecessary violence, and one where he's exceptionally excellent at delivering what is perceived by others as violence, but he does not perceive it as anything more than following orders.
The conditioning would be better if the subject were willing. However, as the movie goes, the conditioning comes to a person who was not willing.
There are four ways to get someone into a subconscious state (SODA: Shock, Overload, Deception, Anticipatory). To move this person into a subconscious state without his permission, we will begin with overload.
The candidate will have to be run by someone who is perceived as a superior officer. In this way, the person is already conditioned to follow orders, which is a requirement of the military.
Now, overload begins with tasks that require both physical and mental concentration. By compounding the tasks so that there are more and more demands placed on this same individual, what happens is that the person, at some point, will discover that he can't consciously concentrate on maintaining all the tasks all at once, so he slips into a subconscious state, which easily processes all the tasks, but then becomes more susceptable to control, especially if he's unaware that he's shifted from a conscious state to a subconscious state (the easiest way I know is that my perception of time shifts)
For example, give the candidate a crash course in shapes, textures and colors of paint, as well as a symbolic interpretation of each shape of sign and the underlying meaning of colors. This is to create a foundation of chaos. Next, put the candidate on a march that runs an inevitable lap, so that the starting point and ending point is the same. Put a set of headphones on the candidate so you can give additional orders to the person while he's marching, as well as two CCD video cameras, one to watch his face at all times and the other to watch where's going. We need this to watch for signs that the person is passing into a subconscious state, as well as knowing where in the field the person is
Around this track, you will need to place pictures, billboards, symbols and other visual distractions. There must be an odd number of signs, less than a hundred, and prime. In this way, there's no actual pattern the person can use to break the strides into exact steps between signs and the parameters of the overall march. This adds stress. I would recommend no less than 53 signs nor more than 83. Have these signs in all forms of shapes, colors, and messages. Have only eleven of the messages infer the mindset you want your killer to believe.
As the runner goes around the lap the first time, do not make any reference to the signs for over half of the lap, then demand that the candidate count all of the yellow signs with blue lettering that have the word "refrain" in them. Next, just as the person gets to the starting line, add the next command, and when he gets past just five signs, add the next, and the next, while commanding that the person will get tested at the end of the run. What we're going to do is to program him from a suggestion of individual words that he's picking out of these signs. Thus, anyone looking at the messages will see nothing out of the ordinary in the messages, but our candidate will be asked to find each of these words over the course of the run "Refrain, from, questioning, authority..." and whatever message you want delivered to most tweak the ultimate mindset of your killer.
At some point, the person will hit overload. At that point, the person's eyelids will flutter, and then this candidate will go into automatic pilot, for the majority of the candidate's mind will go into a hibernation state while the physical demands will remain in motion.
It is at this point where the actual programming can begin.
Does anyone have an interest in this thread? From here, there are many levels of conditioning that need to take place, mostly from the invocation of imagination as a vivid and vital tool of reprogramming, but it would take a bit of writing. If there's no interest, I don't want to waste my time.
Let me know.
Peace,
Dave Brager dibra...@NOSPAMverizon.net scrypnosis.com
Willing assassins are a dime-a-dozen these days. I wonder if Brager's strategy could get people to STOP smoking and STOP over-eating? Like all the hypeno TAPES and CDs that are being HUSTLED...
I despise hypnosis applications for weight loss and smoking. That fits under what I call "The Shovel Syndrome." People assume that a shovel only has two applications: Digging holes and moving dog shit. However, give a shovel to an improvisation troupe and you get an eye patch for a stupid giant, a sled for a two year old, a baseball cup for an even stupider giant, a baseball cup for an elephant, a oar for a rowboat, the stupidest giant's Q-Tip®, and many other applications.
My website has hypnosis modules for multiple orgasms, grief and anxiety relief, better golf, better grades, better memory use, eyes-open and eyes- closed adventure role playing game applications, and many valid and non- typical applications.
I obtained a gastric bypass because I needed a permanent fix for weight loss. I have never believed hypnosis to be effective for long-term weight loss because people's lives change, their situation flux, and in the briefest moment of decision, people can change all their decision-based logic about how they relate to food while under stress. Surgery doesn't change.
> "David Brager" <d.bra...@NOSPAMverizon.net> wrote in message > news:yxsRc.5330$114.3006@nwrddc02.gnilink.net... > I must disclose that I have only seen the original movie with the > supporting role by Frank Sinatra, and have not read the book. > ==================================================================
> How to make a Manchurian Candidate.
> {I am going to assume the candidate is male. It is quite possible for > female. However, it's a hell of a lot easier to write with only one gender > in mind.}
> Here is how I would do it.
> First off, we need the ideal subject, someone who wasn't planning on being > in the military -- it was never his life-long dream -- but once there, the > soldier turned out to be really excellent at it. The reason this is ideal > is that we're going to build two diametrically opposite belief systems in > this individual: One where the person maintains that he's opposed to > unnecessary violence, and one where he's exceptionally excellent at > delivering what is perceived by others as violence, but he does not > perceive it as anything more than following orders.
> The conditioning would be better if the subject were willing. However, as > the movie goes, the conditioning comes to a person who was not willing.
> There are four ways to get someone into a subconscious state (SODA: Shock, > Overload, Deception, Anticipatory). To move this person into a > subconscious state without his permission, we will begin with overload.
> The candidate will have to be run by someone who is perceived as a superior > officer. In this way, the person is already conditioned to follow orders, > which is a requirement of the military.
> Now, overload begins with tasks that require both physical and mental > concentration. By compounding the tasks so that there are more and more > demands placed on this same individual, what happens is that the person, at > some point, will discover that he can't consciously concentrate on > maintaining all the tasks all at once, so he slips into a subconscious > state, which easily processes all the tasks, but then becomes more > susceptable to control, especially if he's unaware that he's shifted from a > conscious state to a subconscious state (the easiest way I know is that my > perception of time shifts)
> For example, give the candidate a crash course in shapes, textures and > colors of paint, as well as a symbolic interpretation of each shape of sign > and the underlying meaning of colors. This is to create a foundation of > chaos. Next, put the candidate on a march that runs an inevitable lap, so > that the starting point and ending point is the same. Put a set of > headphones on the candidate so you can give additional orders to the person > while he's marching, as well as two CCD video cameras, one to watch his > face at all times and the other to watch where's going. We need this to > watch for signs that the person is passing into a subconscious state, as > well as knowing where in the field the person is
> Around this track, you will need to place pictures, billboards, symbols and > other visual distractions. There must be an odd number of signs, less than > a hundred, and prime. In this way, there's no actual pattern the person > can use to break the strides into exact steps between signs and the > parameters of the overall march. This adds stress. I would recommend no > less than 53 signs nor more than 83. Have these signs in all forms of > shapes, colors, and messages. Have only eleven of the messages infer the > mindset you want your killer to believe.
> As the runner goes around the lap the first time, do not make any reference > to the signs for over half of the lap, then demand that the candidate count > all of the yellow signs with blue lettering that have the word "refrain" in > them. Next, just as the person gets to the starting line, add the next > command, and when he gets past just five signs, add the next, and the next, > while commanding that the person will get tested at the end of the run. > What we're going to do is to program him from a suggestion of individual > words that he's picking out of these signs. Thus, anyone looking at the > messages will see nothing out of the ordinary in the messages, but our > candidate will be asked to find each of these words over the course of the > run "Refrain, from, questioning, authority..." and whatever message you > want delivered to most tweak the ultimate mindset of your killer.
> At some point, the person will hit overload. At that point, the person's > eyelids will flutter, and then this candidate will go into automatic pilot, > for the majority of the candidate's mind will go into a hibernation state > while the physical demands will remain in motion.
> It is at this point where the actual programming can begin.
> Does anyone have an interest in this thread? From here, there are many > levels of conditioning that need to take place, mostly from the invocation > of imagination as a vivid and vital tool of reprogramming, but it would > take a bit of writing. If there's no interest, I don't want to waste my > time.
> Let me know.
> Peace,
> Dave Brager > dibra...@NOSPAMverizon.net > scrypnosis.com
I'm VERY INTERESTED in what you have to say. This post of yours contains a lot of very valuable information, not only for myself, but for usenet archives. It would be greatly appreciated if you would continue.
Is the level of deep hypnotic suggestion as used in movies like THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE and TELEPHON really possible??? Could someone really be turned into a killer, complete with hypnotic trigger?
I, too, have been watching the original 1962 version of the movie. I have so many questions for this group regarding hypnosis and brainwashing. You've answered many of them. Please continue.
I've researched a lot about hypnosis in my time, but I've never heard of that phenomenon. Tell me, why does it happen?
"David Brager" <dibra...@NOSPAMscrypnosis.com> wrote in message
news:8sRRc.9263$BO.1970@nwrddc03.gnilink.net... For those that don't know hypnosis, the first and most common proof that a person is entering a subconscious state is a fluttering of the eyelids.
Well, maybe you could compensate for that by adding something to the session that helps the person resist bad changes to this decision-based logic of theirs you talked about. I'm really not sure if that's feasible, but it's just a theory.
"David Brager" <dibra...@NOSPAMscrypnosis.com> wrote in message
news:9kRRc.9253$BO.3593@nwrddc03.gnilink.net... I despise hypnosis applications for weight loss and smoking. That fits under what I call "The Shovel Syndrome." People assume that a shovel only has two applications: Digging holes and moving dog shit. However, give a shovel to an improvisation troupe and you get an eye patch for a stupid giant, a sled for a two year old, a baseball cup for an even stupider giant, a baseball cup for an elephant, a oar for a rowboat, the stupidest giant's Q-Tip®, and many other applications.
My website has hypnosis modules for multiple orgasms, grief and anxiety relief, better golf, better grades, better memory use, eyes-open and eyes- closed adventure role playing game applications, and many valid and non- typical applications.
I obtained a gastric bypass because I needed a permanent fix for weight loss. I have never believed hypnosis to be effective for long-term weight loss because people's lives change, their situation flux, and in the briefest moment of decision, people can change all their decision-based logic about how they relate to food while under stress. Surgery doesn't change.
How to Make a Manchurian Candidate...continued (by David I. Brager/Scrypnosis.com)
There is a stage that needs to take place BEFORE the stage that I've already posted.
To make the game work, we're going to need to condition our candidate to have a vivid imagination. If the candidate does not have sufficient imagination, none of this will work to the maximal employ of the system.
We want our candidate to build an imaginary character. This will, in time, be used to educate our candidate's alter ego so as to become real in an imagined set.
To make this work to the best of the process, I'd recommend the programmer make a composite list of book and movie characters cut and pasted together by their strengths and/or their ideologies. You want to make very sure that he's witnessed these characters and had discussions about qualities of these characters which would be ideal for a specific special forces application, and for this person to let their imaginary character's ego have these abilities and beliefs. Give the candidate's imaginary character a name, and then refer to it whenever you need it.
Throughout this conditioning phase, you'll need to use an approach to role playing similar to Dungeons and Dragons. You want to approach it from creating belief systems that substantiate the existence of the imagined identity and subsequently develop the intrinsic logic that supports the cold killer instinct that our candidate does not have. We also want to have the candidate conditioned to allow only the most mundane memories of what is happening to the imagined character be remembered by their own "real" personality. Thus, we need to add that there be "extra attention paid to the scenery and travel so that the main ego is always entertained and knows where he's going because he knows where he's been even though he doesn't necessarily understand why the imagined personality does what it does, and never remembers it doing anything that is outside of the main personality's value system." (my suggestions as worded)
One thing that most people don't realize about D&D is the importance of the Dungeon Master. This person is one whom you cannot kill. The reason you cannot kill him or her is that this person is God. This person controls heaven and earth around the existence and belief structure of the gaming environment. Subsequently, it must be maintained that in imagining these facets of character, the imagined character will do nothing, ever, to hurt or kill the game master, programmer, or whatever you want to call this modern-day puppetmaster.
At some point in the game, the programmer must begin using a telephone as the dispatch point of transmitting orders for the imaginary character. This will be used later in the process (as used in the movie).
=============================================================== As stated in my last post, there are four ways to get someone into a subconscious state (SODA: Shock, Overload, Deception, Anticipatory). Now that we have this person approaching overload, it would be vital to start shooting at him with live ammunition while he's wearing Kevlar. You'll need a marksman and one very precise shot. You want something that will create intense pain but not kill the victim. The purpose of the one shot is to establish a trigger. I'd say aim for the left nipple, and you might mil down the powder on the ammunition so that this one shot has less punch, but does the damage that is needed.
Most people don't realize, when it happens, the moment they've dropped into a subconscious state. They also don't realize when they have intense pain or intense fear, the mind escapes reality through enabling disbelief (which is also a form of subconsciousness). Disbelief is what happens when you find yourself saying, "I can't believe this is happening." The instant you feel it, your mind will then augment your sense of reality so that everything feels surreal. That sensation is the instant of subconsciousness, and for the untrained mind, it's very unnerving.
So, what do we have so far? A person who has been conditioned to play role-playing games with a precisely enlightened imaginary character, an then intellectually challenged to the extremes of an exercise, and finally, when he least expects it, he's shot in the nipple, but not pierced due to protective clothing, but then shot at with multiple near misses. Here, our contender is prime for programming, for as we've shot our own person, we've now opened the meanest approach to subconsciousness: Deception.
Trust is the primary basis of doing effective and good hypnosis. Those of us who help teach hypnosis are striving to let people achieve specific goals through anticipatory approaches that we know will achieve the subconscious states we need to get the ball rolling.
When you shoot at someone, you destroy all trust. However, in this field, you need someone to help this candidate, who was just shot, shelter him, take him in, and condition him. The candidate is now primed for programming, and it will be the programmer's job to take it from here.
Anyone familiar with Neuro-Linguistic Programming understands that you can trigger one type of behavior in relation to a motion or contact. What we're shooting for here is to set a word to be a trigger, and every time the word is used as a trigger, the pained nipple needs to be touched, brushed, or pushed. In this way, the trigger is bound to the physical memory of pain, and at this moment, you want to provide "proof" that the pain was from a government, etc. that has deceived the candidate, or more specific than that, if you know the target or stratification of persons that you want the candidate to kill, you want to make that association here.
From my research, I found that each human uses a personality vessel system to manage the memory of each individual identity they meet, whether real or imagined. Consider the facet of cartoon characters. They're not real, right? However, from asking subconscious people to set their own personalities aside and to allow these alternative personalities to take over their bodies for a period of time, I discovered that their mind's adaptation and learning were so complete and the absorption of minuscule idiosyncrasies were so precise that the transformations were better than most actors could do with a week's preparations. It was instantaneous and extreme. I've had people become Fred Flintstone or Mr. Spock, and many other characters from entertainment mediums, and these people were not actors, but their minds adapted and saw all transformations of values to their correct limits within an instant of asking for such changes.
So, while we have our person in a decepted, shocked, and overloaded subconscious state, and in clear craving of needing to escape from reality, we suggest that this person let their own personality take a break and, for an undisclosed but specific period of time, let the imagined character take over their body and become real. Then suggest that anytime they hear the word which had been set as the trigger/nipple/pain trigger, the person will instantly feel the need to escape reality and drop into this alter personality as a protection mechanism.
Now, once the person is actually being the imagined character, the programmer can teach this alter ego anything he likes. All you need to do is remind the character that what he is learning is not to be learned by the candidate's real identity. This is where the split in personality becomes more apparent.
People don't realize that you can educate personalities without educating the whole being. Mind you, with enough hypnosis, you can draw knowledge from one personality and feed it to another within the same being, but let us say that these personality vessels are quite separate and quite individual to their own programming.
So, if you train the alter ego to kill with stealth, you may also want to add suggestions that the true ego "will not understand how to use these tools, nor remember them being in his possession, but remember only that he was ordered to keep them in near proximity at all times." (this is the suggestion I would use, as worded)
The process of using food as a trigger works well because hungry people more often act out of instinct rather than conditioning. Thus, we might also pack triggers and orders into candy bars, so that the target's name is printed on the coating of the candy bar, and once eaten, the evidence is ingested, and then, at the end of an assignment, the person is to take out a specific candy bar, which, by the way, has his name imprinted on it, and he's to eat the entire top layer, which has his name on it, and when he does his last swallow, the alter ego will have gone and the main ego will have returned.
There is the matter of time perception that should be addressed. People don't like to feel like the world has changed without their knowledge, and having personalities turn on and off can also bring the sensation that the ego which is in the NOW has only just arrived. This can be problematic, for we don't want our candidate to realize that anything is out of the ordinary. So, we then need to establish an access to event knowledge that is sufficient in delivering a storyline that's plausible without destroying believability on the part of the primary ego. Thus, we need to remind the person of that point in their conditioning where the candidate was asked to give "extra attention paid to the scenery and travel..." (just as written above, but I won't bore you...much)
The rest of the process should be fairly simple and left to the programmers, and tested. The phone trigger should get some exercises, with emphasis on the candidate experiencing disbelief and shock of having received a call, for the clear
...
David, I hate to break the news to you, but the MKULTRA model, which you are using a good part of in this proposition, does NOT work. That's why the government scrapped the project.
Also, such conditioning tends to depotentiate quite rapidly when the constant reinforcement is removed, especially in the face of definite opposition from the victim. Ask any vet who went through the Hanoi Hilton, the Korean and Chinese "Re-education Camps" and the like. Same basic model, with the addition of repeated negative reinforcement, still failed, uniformly against those who were opposed to the system and who left the area where constant reinforcement (or the threat of immediate recapture and a repeat of the whole process) was present.
But it makes for interesting fantasy/science fiction.
For once, Ed and I agree, this is poppycock. But, honestly, Ed said it better.
INQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW - Most people's minds are MUSH and easily MALLEABLE. Do you ever wonder why we call crazy peale in-sane and not out-sane? Do people have to go crazy (break patterns) in order to go sane (in-sane)? Can you really name ONE person that you think is two-feet-on-the-ground sane (like the Gold Standard for sanity)? The good news is, you don't have to be Chinese to be a Manchurian candidate, but it may help. Anyone for a fortune cookie? :-)
Eternity Bridge - "The bridge to eternity is built through the hearts and minds of those who love us. And love is the river that flows forever beneath it." -Ed McClelland HypnoTheraPlay(c) www.HypnoTheraPlay.comwww.DeepTrance.com DeepTra...@WebTV.Net
"In" is a prefix for "not," like "un," "im," and "an" are. "Out" is not. That's your reason.
"Ed McClelland" <DeepTra...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:22705-411A22EA-19@storefull-3253.bay.webtv.net... INQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW - Most people's minds are MUSH and easily MALLEABLE. Do you ever wonder why we call crazy peale in-sane and not out-sane? Do people have to go crazy (break patterns) in order to go sane (in-sane)? Can you really name ONE person that you think is two-feet-on-the-ground sane (like the Gold Standard for sanity)? The good news is, you don't have to be Chinese to be a Manchurian candidate, but it may help. Anyone for a fortune cookie? :-)
Eternity Bridge - "The bridge to eternity is built through the hearts and minds of those who love us. And love is the river that flows forever beneath it." -Ed McClelland HypnoTheraPlay(c) www.HypnoTheraPlay.comwww.DeepTrance.com DeepTra...@WebTV.Net
Eternity Bridge - "The bridge to eternity is built through the hearts and minds of those who love us. And love is the river that flows forever beneath it." -Ed McClelland HypnoTheraPlay(c) www.HypnoTheraPlay.comwww.DeepTrance.com DeepTra...@WebTV.Net
DeepTra...@webtv.net (Ed McClelland) wrote in message <news:26692-4121F597-330@storefull-3256.bay.webtv.net>... > BIRD BRAIN WARNING: The little Sparrow is always trying to make a dent > in someone because he has a CHINK in his ARMOR...
Thanks for proving my point, Ed. Your racist comments only show that your "bridge of love" sig line in some of your other posts is total nonsense as far as your actual actions are concerned.
A racist is someone with a mind that is closed by someone else's genetic heritage and racial origin. The racist does not look beyond the color of someone's skin, the angle of their eyes, the religious history from which they come they or the accent with which they speak.
Your use of the word "chink" and "gook" prove that you are a racist, Ed. No spin possible.
Hence, the Sparrow isn't so bird brained at all, but has hit your argument more like the Sparrow missile with which you claim to be so familiar. Your flame has been shot down IN flames.
LITTLE SPARROW TAKES A BIRD BATH The word WATER never made anyone WET. And the word RACIST never made anyone a RACIST. If anything, I'm a HUMAN RACIST that equally LOVES spicks, kikes, polocks, niggers, wops, micks (see Potato Heads), krauts, frogs, lime muchers, ragheads, chinks, gooks (see Sen. John McCain jokes), slopes, blubber eaters, dotheads, greasers, beaners, slant-eyes, round-eyes, square-eyes, scalpers, and politicians. QUESTION-FOR-THE-DAY: Where do unemployed stage hypnotists find work? ANSWER: As alt.hypnosis PC POLICE...