On 21 Mar 2009, "rf" <r...@z.invalid> wrote:
> Neredbojias wrote:Right, and I saw your specific comment re. that which seem to go
>> On 20 Mar 2009, "rf" <r...@z.invalid> wrote:
>>> Clayburn wrote:
>>>> Okay, I think I got it. The problem is for some reason the
>>> No, the problem is not "for some reason the </form> creates an
>>> You could have removed these margins:
>> I'd have thought that would've been the first thing anybody
> Indeed. But, we had just got through the problem of whitespace
ignored. When I cleaned the whitespace with developer, it wasn't what
was between the object and embed tags that mattered...
> The layout should be dumped IMHO. The possibility of a monitoryAbsolutely. Thats a pretty poor bit of markup even for an amateur. I
> refund from the original perpetrators of this flawed design should be
looked at Adrienne B.'s latest page (...problems with Flash rendering)
and must say I was impressed. Simple - functional - attractive. Good
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.