Odd Things For Writers - Website to Critique

Jeff

unread,

Dec 16, 2009, 4:27:49 PM12/16/09

to

I've put together a little website at www.odd-things.com which is primarily
of interest to writers. Please let me know your thoughts about that
website.

dorayme

unread,

Dec 16, 2009, 4:49:45 PM12/16/09

to

In article <Xns9CE388F5B722...@208.90.168.18>,
Jeff <clis...@aol.com> wrote:

It is simply dreadful.

--
dorayme

freemont

unread,

Dec 16, 2009, 5:42:48 PM12/16/09

to

On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:27:49 +0000, Jeff writ:

> I've put together a little website at wwww.anotherjeffnapiersite.comm

> which is
> primarily of interest to writers. Please let me know your thoughts about
> that website.

Another site from Jeff Napier, just trying to run up some Adsense
page impressions again. Don't bother.

If you're tempted anyway, here's a screenshot:

<http://i45.tinypic.com/2eknf2u.jpg>

All his sites look exactly like this, and none contain any content of any
interest to anyone (sane). They exist for the ads.
--
"Because all you of Earth are idiots!"
¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·-> freemont© <-·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯

Beauregard T. Shagnasty

unread,

Dec 16, 2009, 6:26:25 PM12/16/09

to

dorayme wrote:

> Jeff <clis...@aol.com> wrote:
>> I've put together a little website at www.SPAM-things.com which is

>> primarily of interest to writers. Please let me know your thoughts
>> about that website.
>
> It is simply dreadful.

It's also *spam*. This Jeff person "asks for a critique" for this same
old site every few months or so. Periodically, advice is given but the
next time, it's still the same-old, same-old...

--
-bts
-Friends don't let friends drive Windows

dorayme

unread,

Dec 17, 2009, 12:31:42 AM12/17/09

to

In article <hgbqb1$47k$1...@news.eternal-september.org>,

"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.non...@example.invalid> wrote:

> dorayme wrote:
>
> > Jeff <clis...@aol.com> wrote:
> >> I've put together a little website at www.SPAM-things.com which is
> >> primarily of interest to writers. Please let me know your thoughts
> >> about that website.
> >
> > It is simply dreadful.
>
> It's also *spam*. This Jeff person "asks for a critique" for this same
> old site every few months or so. Periodically, advice is given but the
> next time, it's still the same-old, same-old...

OK, I will watch out for this.

--
dorayme

freemont

unread,

Dec 17, 2009, 8:11:39 AM12/17/09

to

On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:26:25 -0500, Beauregard T. Shagnasty writ:

> dorayme wrote:
>
>> Jeff <clis...@aol.com> wrote:
>>> I've put together a little website at www.SPAM-things.com which is
>>> primarily of interest to writers. Please let me know your thoughts
>>> about that website.
>>
>> It is simply dreadful.
>
> It's also *spam*. This Jeff person "asks for a critique" for this same
> old site every few months or so. Periodically, advice is given but the
> next time, it's still the same-old, same-old...

Aren't they different sites sometimes, though? I seem to remember one
about bicycle riding, maybe another about site development, etc, etc. But
they always look the same (like shit). Always the same stupid non-
functional java applets and nonsensical ramblings sitting over butt-ugly
backgrounds. And always a column of ads, of course.

Beauregard T. Shagnasty

unread,

Dec 17, 2009, 8:46:54 AM12/17/09

to

freemont wrote:

> Beauregard T. Shagnasty writ:

>> It's also *spam*. This Jeff person "asks for a critique" for this
>> same old site every few months or so. Periodically, advice is given
>> but the next time, it's still the same-old, same-old...
>
> Aren't they different sites sometimes, though? I seem to remember one
> about bicycle riding, maybe another about site development, etc, etc.
> But they always look the same (like shit). Always the same stupid
> non- functional java applets and nonsensical ramblings sitting over
> butt-ugly backgrounds. And always a column of ads, of course.

You actually read the content? <lol>

Yes, you're right. They are different, but to a very small degree of
'different'...