Gore, Knock It the Fuck Off
Robert Lee
Newsgroups: News East:alt.horror
I wondered why I was getting a ton of Swen mail all of a sudden, when it
had died down of late. So I got an idea, and went looking on Google for
my
non-munged email address.
And guess what? There are a couple of new ones, since after Swen hit, and
after I posted all that advice here about not using your actual email
address on Usenet in the future.
And here they are:
and
I suppose you could try to make some excuse, Gore, about your posting
software, except you fucked up in the first post and removed the first
bracket around my email address, too, which a filter wouldn't have done.
Note that in the second, you're actually quoting Pig's response to me and
in his response, my "snippitydoodah" is intact.
I guess you felt like I deserved this because I'm a "racist" or
something, although one of the posts precedes that whole fracas, so I
dunno. Whatever rationalization for this your fevered little brain came
up with, this is petty beyond belief and a real pain in the ass for me.
Thanks a lot, shithead. I'm in the middle of a job, now, where I'm
communicating mainly via email and now I've got to deal with umpteen
fucking mails with attachments again every day. (No, I don't use the same
address for work, but I use the same mail app.)
I don't believe what a pathetic little bitch you are, Gore. I may not
like you, but I would have thought you above something this childish and
destructive.
Oh, and try and keep in mind when you respond that I have your real email
address here.
"You stupid fuckin’ cunt. You idiot. Who ever told you that you could
work with men? ...you fucking child."
--
--Robert
But she's not afraid to die, the people all call her Alaska
Bombsquad
Robert Lee wrote:
Huh?
Bombsquad
Robert Lee
@yahoo.com:
>
> Huh?
The Gore-Met intentionally knocked the "snippitydoodah" out of my Usenet
posting email address on a couple of posts last week, presumably so exactly
what did happen would happen: I started getting those "Swen" email worms
that mine people's Usenet folders in Outlook again.
bod
"Robert Lee" <cranch...@snippitydoodah.earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:Xns94159CCF3ECE3cr...@207.69.154.206...
> Bombsquad <Djangoth...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:3F8DC2CE.4A8E6C65
> @yahoo.com:
>
> >
> > Huh?
>
> The Gore-Met intentionally knocked the "snippitydoodah" out of my Usenet
> posting email address on a couple of posts last week, presumably so
exactly
> what did happen would happen: I started getting those "Swen" email worms
> that mine people's Usenet folders in Outlook again.
>
lol....thats funny!!
just ingnore it all...honestly robert, you wouldnt beleive the crap i get
sent...i just ignore it all!!
for a moment then i thought the gore was spamming you!!!
--
regards from BOD!
"dont worry yoko, its only a friggin water pist...."
JOHN LENNON 1980
see bod pissing in the wind at...
www.bodland.co.uk the home of bod!
Dr Walpurgis
Have I missed something somewhere, or are you just back to being a loony
again?
--
Dr Walpurgis, or AYOC?
Robert Lee
77616.news.uni-berlin.de:
> just ingnore it all...
In case you haven't noticed, I do "ignore it all" pretty much, anymore.
I'm not going to let somebody do something this asinine to me, though,
and not let everybody in the forum know about it, at least.
Jesus, *Trotsky's* never done anything this bad to me.
> for a moment then i thought the gore was spamming you!!!
He is, basically. There's no difference between what he did and going out
and signing somebody up for a bunch of porn web sites or whatever--save
that he knew that what was going to be coming at my computer was all
malicious code.
bod
i think gore is just spreading the love around BABY...
allright it may be a dirty trick, but he just doesnt want you to miss out of
anything the rest of us regs have to put up with!!
let face it...we all need a bigger penis to see to our horny 18 year old
webcam slut that lives next door!!
Robert Lee
news:bmkied$nltqo$1...@ID-77616.news.uni-berlin.de:
>
> i think gore is just spreading the love around BABY...
> allright it may be a dirty trick, but he just doesnt want you to miss
> out of anything the rest of us regs have to put up with!!
That's a really odd way of rationalizing this kind of behavior, bod. Hey,
you think it'd be cool if I posted Gore's email address for the same
reason, the one he doesn't use on Usenet?
I didn't think so. (Not like I'm going to do that, since I'm not a big
baby.)
> let face it...we all need a bigger penis to see to our horny 18 year
> old webcam slut that lives next door!!
Bod, I'd rather get porn spam than viruses any day.
Homer
<cranch...@snippitydoodah.earthlink.net> wrote:
>Bombsquad <Djangoth...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:3F8DC2CE.4A8E6C65
>@yahoo.com:
>
>>
>> Huh?
>
>The Gore-Met intentionally knocked the "snippitydoodah" out of my Usenet
>posting email address on a couple of posts last week, presumably so exactly
>what did happen would happen: I started getting those "Swen" email worms
>that mine people's Usenet folders in Outlook again.
I'm sorry, Robert, but that's an incredibly half-assed theory.
--
Homer
----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
Robert Lee
news:rvlrov4pslit81av1...@4ax.com:
>>The Gore-Met intentionally knocked the "snippitydoodah" out of my
>>Usenet posting email address on a couple of posts last week,
>>presumably so exactly what did happen would happen: I started getting
>>those "Swen" email worms that mine people's Usenet folders in Outlook
>>again.
>
> I'm sorry, Robert, but that's an incredibly half-assed theory.
No, it's not. Look at the posts. In the second, he had to dip down into
Pig's attribution to remove my spam and virus blocker--you can check
Pig's initial response to me a few entries back on Google--the blocker's
intact, there.
If you don't feel like bothering with that, shut up, if you don't mind.
Given that I posted extensively on how to thwart the Swen worm right
before this happened, I can't think of a better reason for him to have
taken this trouble. If you can suggest a better reason, please, let's
have it. I certainly haven't noticed that Gore makes a practice of
removing people's spam blockers when he responds, and as I took pains to
point out, the absurd possiblity that he's got some kind of filter that
removes them isn't even an absurd possibility, since he fucked it up the
first time.
Robert Lee
> I certainly haven't noticed that Gore makes a practice of
> removing people's spam blockers when he responds, and as I took pains
> to point out, the absurd possiblity that he's got some kind of filter
> that removes them isn't even an absurd possibility, since he fucked it
> up the first time.
Oh, and for anybody who doesn't bother looking at the posts, the chances
of this being an accident are nil. The blocker's right in the middle of
my email address, and in both posts only it's gone, so this can't have
been a cut and paste error.
So the plain fact here is that Gore posted my email address, and did so
intentionally.
My further supposition comes from two more facts, that he did so right
after the widely noted advent of the first Internet worm that mines
Usenet posts, and right after I'd posted several articles in response to
other members, advising how to thwart it and similar attacks in the
future.
Obviously, I'll retract that supposition if Gore can come up with a
reasonable explanation for the first, indisputable fact.
--
--Robert (I was wondering why I started getting spam again, too, since I
don't use this address anywhere on the Web)
Homer
<cranch...@snippitydoodah.earthlink.net> wrote:
>Homer <home...@nolightlyglazedspamhotmail.com> wrote in
>news:rvlrov4pslit81av1...@4ax.com:
>
>>>The Gore-Met intentionally knocked the "snippitydoodah" out of my
>>>Usenet posting email address on a couple of posts last week,
>>>presumably so exactly what did happen would happen: I started getting
>>>those "Swen" email worms that mine people's Usenet folders in Outlook
>>>again.
>>
>> I'm sorry, Robert, but that's an incredibly half-assed theory.
>
>No, it's not. Look at the posts. In the second, he had to dip down into
>Pig's attribution to remove my spam and virus blocker--you can check
>Pig's initial response to me a few entries back on Google--the blocker's
>intact, there.
>
>If you don't feel like bothering with that, shut up, if you don't mind.
I know Gore. That's the only point that needs to be addressed.
I'll make it easy for you, and just let you talk to the voices in your
head. The last time I killfiled you, I didn't feel bad about it. This
time I'm kind of bummed out, though, because it really looked like you
were getting better. I hope someday it takes.
^TooL^
>
> In case you haven't noticed, I do "ignore it all" pretty much, anymore.
Me fail english? That's unpossible!
^TooL^
^TooL^
> like you, but I would have thought you above something this childish and
> destructive.
Wow... Fight's on again.
Anyone wanna join me in the lounge to watch this on the big-screen tv?
^TooL^
Robert Lee
news:52orovcuqmu8c62sp...@4ax.com:
> I know Gore. That's the only point that needs to be addressed.
In other words, you can't explain it, so you'll just ignore it and pretend
I'm being crazy.
> I'll make it easy for you, and just let you talk to the voices in your
> head.
Oh, fuck off, you obsequious little toady. If it weren't for ass-kissing
and "me too" posts for members here you obviously feel do you a great favor
just by liking you, you'd have barely any posting record.
PLONK right back.
Robert Lee
$bo1.1...@news-server.bigpond.net.au:
> Wow... Fight's on again.
Nope. Still got him killfiled. If I'm going to see an explanation, it's
going to have to be because somebody responds.
I won't see it, though. If Gore bothers to respond, he'll completely avoid
the subject and hurl gratuitous insults at me instead. Bet you a dollar,
US.
^TooL^
>
> In other words, you can't explain it, so you'll just ignore it and pretend
> I'm being crazy.
>
> > I'll make it easy for you, and just let you talk to the voices in your
> > head.
>
> Oh, fuck off, you obsequious little toady. If it weren't for ass-kissing
> and "me too" posts for members here you obviously feel do you a great
favor
> just by liking you, you'd have barely any posting record.
>
> PLONK right back.
>
> --
> --Robert
Oooh! Oooh! Plonk me too! Plonk me too!
I gotta say Bobbly, you took your sweet time going back to your old self. I
was getting bored of 'nice robert'...
^TooL^
^TooL^
"Robert Lee" <cranch...@snippitydoodah.earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9415B80E314FEcr...@207.69.154.202...
> "^TooL^" <j_ca...@SPAMSPAMSPAMhotmail.com> wrote in news:uUljb.152442
> $bo1.1...@news-server.bigpond.net.au:
>
> > Wow... Fight's on again.
>
> Nope. Still got him killfiled. If I'm going to see an explanation, it's
> going to have to be because somebody responds.
>
> I won't see it, though. If Gore bothers to respond, he'll completely avoid
> the subject and hurl gratuitous insults at me instead. Bet you a dollar,
> US.
>
> --
> --Robert
A US dollar?!?!?! WOO HOO! I CAN BUY A HOUSE!!!!
*waiting eagerly by the mailbox*
^TooL^
Robert Lee
$bo1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au:
> A US dollar?!?!?! WOO HOO! I CAN BUY A HOUSE!!!!
I was figuring you'd buy your family a goat and some chickens or something,
little foreign boy.
Robert Lee
$bo1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au:
> Oooh! Oooh! Plonk me too! Plonk me too!
Why? You're too consistently amusing to get mad at. Send me some viruses
and I'll think about it.
^TooL^
>
> I was figuring you'd buy your family a goat and some chickens or
something,
> little foreign boy.
>
> --
> --Robert
No no no! Haven't you been listening to your leader? We Australians are your
friends!
I quote from today's paper: (comments in brackets added personally)
"The great thing about Australians is they're not afraid"(to blow up those
funny-looking brown people) Bush said on the eve of a trip to Australia. "We
don't see it as a deputy sheriff. We see it as a sheriff". (woo hoo! We get
to wear George's shiny gold badge!)
Also, in yesterdays paper Bush was quoted as saying something along the
lines of "I'm really excited about coming to Australia, people tell me it's
just like Texas!"... That makes my heart swell with pride, i tells ya...
Wait, what were we talking about? Oh yeah, you're going on one of those
funny 'crazy rants' that you do so well.. Carry on.
^TooL^
^TooL^
> > Oooh! Oooh! Plonk me too! Plonk me too!
>
> Why? You're too consistently amusing to get mad at. Send me some viruses
> and I'll think about it.
>
> --
> --Robert
I can't send you a virus, but i can send you a small plastic bag filled with
my man-juice.
^TooL^
Robert Lee
news:Tpmjb.152489$bo1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au:
> No no no! Haven't you been listening to your leader? We Australians
> are your friends!
I know. That's why I wanted to give you a dollar, so you could feed your
whole swarthy, filthy family for a month or two.
Robert Lee
news:armjb.152491$bo1.1...@news-server.bigpond.net.au:
> I can't send you a virus, but i can send you a small plastic bag
> filled with my man-juice.
I've already got a whole pile of those, and I'm reasonably sure they're
virus infested enough, thanks.
Really, it's an off day when you *don't* send me your man juice, Tool.
^TooL^
> > are your friends!
>
> I know. That's why I wanted to give you a dollar, so you could feed your
> whole swarthy, filthy family for a month or two.
>
> --
> --Robert
Awwww.... that's awfully sweet of you Robby-baby... Now bend over...
^TooL^
Robert Lee
$bo1.1...@news-server.bigpond.net.au:
> Awwww.... that's awfully sweet of you Robby-baby... Now bend over...
>
I've been waiting with the oils and perfumes and incense all night, baby.
Bombsquad
Robert Lee wrote:
PLONK!
Bombsquad
^TooL^
> Really, it's an off day when you *don't* send me your man juice, Tool.
>
> --
> --Robert
Yeah, but i usually like to 'deliver' it more personally, if ya catch my
drift...
^TooL^
^TooL^
> "^TooL^" <j_ca...@SPAMSPAMSPAMhotmail.com> wrote in news:Jvmjb.152495
> $bo1.1...@news-server.bigpond.net.au:
>
> > Awwww.... that's awfully sweet of you Robby-baby... Now bend over...
> >
>
> I've been waiting with the oils and perfumes and incense all night, baby.
>
> --
> --Robert
Sorry, not tonight. I'm seeing JURASSIC 5! WOO HOO!!!!!
Hopefully Charli2na will make me his bitch for the night.
^TooL^
Sefton
<j_ca...@SPAMSPAMSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
>Oooh! Oooh! Plonk me too! Plonk me too!
>I gotta say Bobbly, you took your sweet time going back to your old self. I
>was getting bored of 'nice robert'...
PLONK
*yawn* tired of ^FooL^'s "me too" posts.
Sefton
"What have you been doing to my balls?" - Helmut
Robert Lee
$bo1.1...@news-server.bigpond.net.au:
> Sorry, not tonight. I'm seeing JURASSIC 5!
Eh. The first one wasn't that great, and the next three stunk, especially
the last one, where Jeff Goldblum turned into a bellowing mastadon. (Oh
wait, that was all of them.)
^TooL^
> >I gotta say Bobbly, you took your sweet time going back to your old self.
I
> >was getting bored of 'nice robert'...
>
> PLONK
>
> *yawn* tired of ^FooL^'s "me too" posts.
>
> Sefton
Me too!
PLONK!
^TooL^
Robert Lee
$bo1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au:
> Me too!
> PLONK!
>
Oh, that's it. I'm plonking the whole group, including me.
Ulrich Schreitmueller
>Oh, that's it. I'm plonking the whole group, including me.
>
(in ridiculously deep voice:)
NNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOO....
(rushes towards Robert in slow motion as Robert's finger nears the big
red PLONK button)
(screen goes white)
(insert TCM tagline joke here)
Damn I'm tired,
Uli
Robert Lee
wrote in news:bml2qj$h1s$1...@newsserv.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de:
>
> (in ridiculously deep voice:)
> NNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOO....
> (rushes towards Robert in slow motion as Robert's finger nears the big
> red PLONK button)
>
> (screen goes white)
I...I...I KILLED THE INTERNET.
WideScreenPig
<cranch...@snippitydoodah.earthlink.net> writ thusly:
>Homer <home...@nolightlyglazedspamhotmail.com> wrote in
>news:52orovcuqmu8c62sp...@4ax.com:
>
>> I know Gore. That's the only point that needs to be addressed.
>
>In other words, you can't explain it, so you'll just ignore it and pretend
>I'm being crazy.
>
>> I'll make it easy for you, and just let you talk to the voices in your
>> head.
>
>Oh, fuck off, you obsequious little toady. If it weren't for ass-kissing
>and "me too" posts for members here you obviously feel do you a great favor
>just by liking you, you'd have barely any posting record.
>
>PLONK right back.
Bad enough that that was a gross overreaction, but you had to go and
get personal _and_ gratuitously nasty, didn't you? Worse, you did it
to Homer, somebody who, despite your comments, has long been a
valuable and well respected poster on this n.g. You, on the other
hand, seem to have once again worn out your welcome.
I tried to cut you some slack after you emailed me, both because it
was the right thing to do, and also because I'd genuinely hoped you'd
changed. But this is just too much.
With sincere regrets, I'm killfiling you. Again. Don't bother
emailing me with any more "olive branches" in the future. I'm
unlikely to make the same mistake again.
--
WideScreenPig
Robert Lee
news:g97sov05h3985prdl...@4ax.com:
> Bad enough that that was a gross overreaction
Okay, Bud Number Two from the cabal pretending nothing happened.
> You, on the other
> hand, seem to have once again worn out your welcome.
It's telling that you feel compelled to phrase things this way, Pig. You
and your pals really do think you own this space, don't you?
How pathetic.
Bombsquad
^TooL^ wrote:
Tool does everybody love you?
Bombsquad
Robert Lee
> Subject: Re: Gore, Knock It the Fuck Off
> From: WideScreenPig <spamt...@blowme.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.horror
> Reply-To: spamt...@blowme.com
>
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 01:03:55 GMT, Robert Lee
> <cranch...@snippitydoodah.earthlink.net> writ thusly:
>
>>Homer <home...@nolightlyglazedspamhotmail.com> wrote in
>>news:52orovcuqmu8c62sp...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> I know Gore. That's the only point that needs to be addressed.
>>
>>In other words, you can't explain it, so you'll just ignore it and
>>pretend I'm being crazy.
>>
>>> I'll make it easy for you, and just let you talk to the voices in
>>> your head.
>>
>>Oh, fuck off, you obsequious little toady. If it weren't for
>>ass-kissing and "me too" posts for members here you obviously feel do
>>you a great favor just by liking you, you'd have barely any posting
>>record.
>>
>>PLONK right back.
>
> Bad enough that that was a gross overreaction, but you had to go and
> get personal _and_ gratuitously nasty, didn't you?
Oh, BTW, Homer's the one who started the ad hominems, as anybody can see
right up there in the quotes above, so spare me the sanctimonious crap.
Sefton
<spamt...@blowme.com> wrote:
>Homer, somebody who, despite your comments, has long been a
>valuable and well respected poster on this n.g. You, on the other
>hand, seem to have once again worn out your welcome.
Wtf? O.o
PLONK!
Brian Christgau
news:oGmjb.152503$bo1.1...@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
Hey, I thought you lads killfiled each other.
Look, when I say I killfile somebody I do so to the motherfucker pronto.
When I say it's my last word in a thread (even if some coward continues to
post nasty business about me days after the fact) it's my last word in the
thread.
Now, I'm not saying you should follow my example, but...
Well, actually I sort of am. But not in a self-righteous, scolding kinda
way.
Oh, and anybody who disagrees with and my weltanschaung is a punk ass
bitch in dire need of anal fisting sans KY. Carry on. };)
Cheers,
B
Robert Lee
4ax.com:
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 03:43:50 GMT, WideScreenPig
> <j...@rogers.com> wrote:
>
>>Homer, somebody who, despite your comments, has long been a
>>valuable and well respected poster on this n.g. You, on the other
>>hand, seem to have once again worn out your welcome.
>
> Wtf? O.o
>
> PLONK!
When the dead walk the earth, we must stop the plonking or loose tha hwar.
Robert Lee
news:gPojb.8970$kx....@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net:
> Subject: Re: Gore, Knock It the Fuck Off
> From: "Brian Christgau" <ra...@NOFRIGINGSPAMpipeline.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.horror
> Reply-To: "Brian Christgau" <ra...@NOFRIGINGSPAMpipeline.com>
>
> "^TooL^" <j_ca...@SPAMSPAMSPAMhotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:oGmjb.152503$bo1.1...@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>>
>> > Really, it's an off day when you *don't* send me your man juice,
>> > Tool.
>> >
>> > --
>> > --Robert
>>
>> Yeah, but i usually like to 'deliver' it more personally, if ya catch
>> my drift...
>
> Hey, I thought you lads killfiled each other.
Not me. Maybe I threatened to once, but...you know. Lovers' spats.
Ulrich Schreitmueller
> Ulrich Schreitmueller wrote
>
> >
> > (in ridiculously deep voice:)
> > NNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOO....
> > (rushes towards Robert in slow motion as Robert's finger nears the big
> > red PLONK button)
> >
> > (screen goes white)
>
> I...I...I KILLED THE INTERNET.
Well, I hope you made a backup.
Robert Lee
news:Pine.LNX.4.30.031016...@linux10.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de:
>> > (in ridiculously deep voice:)
>> > NNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOO....
>> > (rushes towards Robert in slow motion as Robert's finger nears the big
>> > red PLONK button)
>> >
>> > (screen goes white)
>>
>> I...I...I KILLED THE INTERNET.
>
> Well, I hope you made a backup.
I did, but unfortunately, it's on a Mac, so I can't do fuck all as far as
system maintainence without a floppy disc.
Robert Lee
> I did, but unfortunately, it's on a Mac, so I can't do fuck all as far
> as system maintainence without a floppy disc.
Oh, and a paper clip. Can't forget that indispensible Apple tool.
Bombsquad
Sefton wrote:
And who is Sefton again?
PLONK!
Bombsquad
Robert Lee
@yahoo.com:
> And who is Sefton again?
>
Well, not part of the A-list, that's for certain. (What is it with these
"Who are you again?" comments, like this was some kind of nineteenth-
century gentlemen's club? It's the fucking waiter, you pansy. Tip him and
keep talking, for the five hundredth time, about your days on the dark
continent.)
Ray Pruit
TEAM PRUIT
RAY PRUIT - REIGNING WCW TV CHAMPION
"Hey Donna."--------- Ray Pruit
Sefton
<Djangoth...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>And who is Sefton again?
>
>PLONK!
Seems I am quickly living up to my name.
Sefton
<cranch...@snippitydoodah.earthlink.net> wrote:
>Well, not part of the A-list, that's for certain.
I don't want to be in an A-list. I know how newsgroups work and I pity
the fool who thinks he's something because he has a mutual apreciation
society going. Support like theirs can disappear overnight. No thanks.
> (What is it with these
>"Who are you again?" comments, like this was some kind of nineteenth-
>century gentlemen's club? It's the fucking waiter, you pansy. Tip him and
>keep talking, for the five hundredth time, about your days on the dark
>continent.)
That's pretty much what makes me wonder how often those 'gentlemen'
ended up unwittingly ingesting the waiters' bodily fluids.
lisa g
"Robert Lee" <cranch...@snippitydoodah.earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9415D963A7A88cr...@207.69.154.206...
> Robert Lee <cranch...@snippitydoodah.earthlink.net> wrote in
> news:Xns9415D9489DBC7cr...@207.69.154.206:
>
> > I did, but unfortunately, it's on a Mac, so I can't do fuck all as far
> > as system maintainence without a floppy disc.
>
> Oh, and a paper clip. Can't forget that indispensible Apple tool.
>
> --
Excellent thread everybody! I was beginning to think of going for a nice
walk in these spare couple of hours but if things are hotting up again it
might be worth watching after all. Just a few weeks of reading alt.horror
and you start noticing you're all going around in circles.
bod
"lisa g" <me@home> wrote in message
news:3f8e7...@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> Excellent thread everybody! I was beginning to think of going for a nice
> walk in these spare couple of hours but if things are hotting up again it
> might be worth watching after all. Just a few weeks of reading alt.horror
> and you start noticing you're all going around in circles.
>
>
every comment posted here is original and inspired, thats why we love it
here....now get your fucking tits out!
--
regards from BOD!
"dont worry yoko, its only a friggin water pist...."
JOHN LENNON 1980
see bod pissing in the wind at...
www.bodland.co.uk the home of bod!
Dr Walpurgis
> Bad enough that that was a gross overreaction, but you had to go and
> get personal _and_ gratuitously nasty, didn't you? Worse, you did it
> to Homer, somebody who, despite your comments, has long been a
> valuable and well respected poster on this n.g. You, on the other
> hand, seem to have once again worn out your welcome.
>
> I tried to cut you some slack after you emailed me, both because it
> was the right thing to do, and also because I'd genuinely hoped you'd
> changed. But this is just too much.
>
> With sincere regrets, I'm killfiling you. Again. Don't bother
> emailing me with any more "olive branches" in the future. I'm
> unlikely to make the same mistake again.
I didn't tell you so, but if I had, now would be the time I'd be saying
"I told you so".
--
Dr Walpurgis, what a strange, strange, sentence.
Dr Walpurgis
> I won't see it, though. If Gore bothers to respond, he'll completely avoid
> the subject and hurl gratuitous insults at me instead. Bet you a dollar,
> US.
Does "a dollar, US", count as as anti-Canadian invective? See I'm
playing my card of "Robert Lee Goes Nutzoid Bingo" here, all I need
is some shit shot at Canada to call the house.
--
"Yes, well, I mean, you know, look..." - Tony Blair giving evidence to
the Hutton Inquiry, 28 Aug 03
Marifasus lupinus
> Given that I posted extensively on how to thwart the Swen worm right
> before this happened, I can't think of a better reason for him to have
> taken this trouble. If you can suggest a better reason, please, let's
> have it. I certainly haven't noticed that Gore makes a practice of
> removing people's spam blockers when he responds, and as I took pains to
> point out, the absurd possiblity that he's got some kind of filter that
> removes them isn't even an absurd possibility, since he fucked it up the
> first time.
Hm. Barring a refutation, what a shitty thing to do. Wouldn't be
surprising, though, sadly. As a die-hard rationalist, I think anyone
who's capable of willfully representing opposing viewpoints -- i.e.,
distorting logic -- as he did throughout the great race debate would
also be capable of permitting himself to act spasmatically in anger.
It all boils down to infantilism.
If he didn't nuthin', then I stand corrected.
-marlup
Marifasus lupinus
> Hm. Barring a refutation, what a shitty thing to do. Wouldn't be
> surprising, though, sadly. As a die-hard rationalist, I think anyone
> who's capable of willfully representing opposing viewpoints -- i.e.,
> distorting logic -- as he did throughout the great race debate would
> also be capable of permitting himself to act spasmatically in anger.
> It all boils down to infantilism.
>
> If he didn't nuthin', then I stand corrected.
>
> -marlup
I obviously have some residual annoyance over the earlier debate, as I
have no business getting involved in this current one. I don't know
any of you guys, and should have a nice cup of shut the fuck up.
Robert, good luck with the spam, Gore-met, sorry I opened my mouth.
You didn't attack my last post in the race thread, and I have no idea
if you're responsible for Robert's spamming.
Hope I learned somthing here...
-ml
Man
amazing how the gore-met refuses to respond.
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 21:23:26 GMT, Robert Lee
<cranch...@snippitydoodah.earthlink.net> wrote:
>Subject: Gore, Knock It the Fuck Off
>Newsgroups: News East:alt.horror
>
>I wondered why I was getting a ton of Swen mail all of a sudden, when it
>had died down of late. So I got an idea, and went looking on Google for
>my
>non-munged email address.
>
>And guess what? There are a couple of new ones, since after Swen hit, and
>after I posted all that advice here about not using your actual email
>address on Usenet in the future.
>
>And here they are:
>
>http://snurl.com/2opk
>
>and
>
>http://snurl.com/2opl
>
>I suppose you could try to make some excuse, Gore, about your posting
>software, except you fucked up in the first post and removed the first
>bracket around my email address, too, which a filter wouldn't have done.
>Note that in the second, you're actually quoting Pig's response to me and
>in his response, my "snippitydoodah" is intact.
>
>I guess you felt like I deserved this because I'm a "racist" or
>something, although one of the posts precedes that whole fracas, so I
>dunno. Whatever rationalization for this your fevered little brain came
>up with, this is petty beyond belief and a real pain in the ass for me.
>Thanks a lot, shithead. I'm in the middle of a job, now, where I'm
>communicating mainly via email and now I've got to deal with umpteen
>fucking mails with attachments again every day. (No, I don't use the same
>address for work, but I use the same mail app.)
>
>I don't believe what a pathetic little bitch you are, Gore. I may not
>like you, but I would have thought you above something this childish and
>destructive.
>
>Oh, and try and keep in mind when you respond that I have your real email
>address here.
>
>"You stupid fuckin’ cunt. You idiot. Who ever told you that you could
>work with men? ...you fucking child."
Robert Lee
4ax.com:
> Subject: Re: Gore, Knock It the Fuck Off
> From: Man <r...@rajah.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.horror
>
>
> amazing how the gore-met refuses to respond.
Prediction two: if anybody responds to this, they'll paint his lack of
response as amazing demonstration of his mature powers of restraint, as
opposed to my nutso "overreaction."
I'll leave it to regular readers of this group to make their own calls as
to Gore's demonstrated restraint and tact in the past.
Franklin Harris
> I'll leave it to regular readers of this group to make their own calls as
> to Gore's demonstrated restraint and tact in the past.
Um, was there a point to this thread?
--
Franklin Harris
Pulp Culture Online, www.pulpculture.net
"The truly psychotic don't need to cop an attitude." -- Poppy Z. Brite,
alt.horror, 2/21/03
Jordan Garren
to Gore's demonstrated restraint and tact in the past.
Still a newbie here but as far as I've seen, Gore doesn't really exercist
restraint. He certainly didn't when he was preaching about his superiority
over me and other people who have movie review sites as a hobby. Perhaps
he's on maternity leave?
- Jordan
--
The B-Movie Film Vault
http://www.geocities.com/jrgdawg/
Fighting the Good Fight For B-Movie Lovers Everywhere Since June 5th, 2000!
Also a Proud Member (and Founder) of The Rogue Reviewers:
http://www.roguereviewers.com
Dr Walpurgis
>>amazing how the gore-met refuses to respond.
Robert Lee replies:
> Prediction two: if anybody responds to this, they'll paint his lack of
> response as amazing demonstration of his mature powers of restraint, as
> opposed to my nutso "overreaction."
Nope, but Gore's last post to alt.horror, a week ago, sure sounded to me
like an "exit stage left":
I hope it wasn't. :-(
Ulrich Schreitmueller
>Man <r...@rajah.com> wrote in news:9r5uovs0aoeddtnpkivs0qcpjdcv9rk8jl@
>4ax.com:
>
>
>
>>Subject: Re: Gore, Knock It the Fuck Off
>>From: Man <r...@rajah.com>
>>Newsgroups: alt.horror
>>
>>
>>amazing how the gore-met refuses to respond.
>>
>>
>
>Prediction two: if anybody responds to this, they'll paint his lack of
>response as amazing demonstration of his mature powers of restraint, as
>opposed to my nutso "overreaction."
>
>
Actually, I read it as "Gore-Met has in recent times only popped in
every few weeks, so it'll be quite some time until he responds - if that
thread is still running by then".
bod
"Ulrich Schreitmueller" <ulrich.sch...@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
wrote in message news:bmncb9$e4o$1...@newsserv.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de...
> Robert Lee wrote:
>
> Actually, I read it as "Gore-Met has in recent times only popped in
> every few weeks, so it'll be quite some time until he responds - if that
> thread is still running by then".
>
yup...while i was banging together ahr2 gore was missing most of the time (2
months i think) even though i contacted him for a contribution...it turned
out he was having a root canal job done on a tooth...
it just shows that we do have real lives at the end of the day!
Andrew
> it just shows that we do have real lives at the end of the day!
Well, I want to trade mine in for a fake one. It is not
very exciting.
Andrew
Homer
<ulrich.sch...@student.uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
>Actually, I read it as "Gore-Met has in recent times only popped in
>every few weeks, so it'll be quite some time until he responds - if that
>thread is still running by then".
That would, of course, be the sensible view.
--
Homer
----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
Homer
<bodster@(nospam)ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
>"Ulrich Schreitmueller" <ulrich.sch...@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
>wrote in message news:bmncb9$e4o$1...@newsserv.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de...
>> Robert Lee wrote:
>>
>
>> Actually, I read it as "Gore-Met has in recent times only popped in
>> every few weeks, so it'll be quite some time until he responds - if that
>> thread is still running by then".
>>
>
>yup...while i was banging together ahr2 gore was missing most of the time (2
>months i think) even though i contacted him for a contribution...it turned
>out he was having a root canal job done on a tooth...
>it just shows that we do have real lives at the end of the day!
In my case, ONLY at the end of the day.
Bombsquad
Jordan Garren wrote:
Jordan, he is superior to you. As is Robert, as is Bod, as is Brian Franklin
Donaldson whatever. Hell, Trotsky is superior than you. That fucker is
determined.
I have no problem with Robert, I think he's a smart guy. I was just tired of
reading the same arguments over and over again. But you? You're pathetic and
backwards and a miserable fucking wretch. You are the ultimate symbol of fan
boy wanking at it's finest. A festering, malignant tumor on the canker sore of
life.
Jordan, you and your rogue reviewers are the cinematic equivalent of stage 3
cancer, and I have not seen a single post, a single utterance of ANYTHING
before your name that might lead me to believe otherwise. Inquisitions are
formed because of people like you, because you can only be rooted out by fire.
You suck. Tomorrow, you will suck. Next week, you will suck. Your family sucks
and your kids will inevitably SUCK. I guess what I'm trying to say is...find a
new hobby.
Like prison rape.
A moment.
Yes, upon further reflection, you still suck.
Bombsquad
^TooL^
> > > >I gotta say Bobbly, you took your sweet time going back to your old
self.
> > I
> > > >was getting bored of 'nice robert'...
> > >
> > > PLONK
> > >
> > > *yawn* tired of ^FooL^'s "me too" posts.
> > >
> > > Sefton
> >
> > Me too!
> > PLONK!
> >
> > ^TooL^
>
> Tool does everybody love you?
>
> Bombsquad
Just you and robert, m'dear.
^TooL^
Avoid normal situations.
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 23:48:43 GMT, Robert Lee
> <cranch...@snippitydoodah.earthlink.net> wrote:
>>Homer <home...@nolightlyglazedspamhotmail.com> wrote in
>>news:rvlrov4pslit81av1...@4ax.com:
[ Stuff from previous posts included just to illustrate the thread and
the point of the article in living color. ]
>>>>The Gore-Met intentionally knocked the "snippitydoodah" out of my
>>>>Usenet posting email address on a couple of posts last week,
>>>>presumably so exactly what did happen would happen: I started getting
>>>>those "Swen" email worms that mine people's Usenet folders in Outlook
>>>>again.
>>>
>>> I'm sorry, Robert, but that's an incredibly half-assed theory.
>>
>>No, it's not. Look at the posts. In the second, he had to dip down into
>>Pig's attribution to remove my spam and virus blocker--you can check
>>Pig's initial response to me a few entries back on Google--the blocker's
>>intact, there.
>>
>>If you don't feel like bothering with that, shut up, if you don't mind.
> I know Gore. That's the only point that needs to be addressed.
Uh... okay.
> I'll make it easy for you, and just let you talk to the voices in your
> head. The last time I killfiled you, I didn't feel bad about it. This
> time I'm kind of bummed out, though, because it really looked like you
> were getting better. I hope someday it takes.
Mr. Lee may indeed be crazy, but that doesn't make him wrong. He made a
sound argument that one of the alpha males of this forum acted in a most
unbecoming way, and supported it with evidence. This kind of "HOW DARE YOU!!"
post is really strange, and not in a good way.
ObHorror: Okay, how about _The Devil Bat_? The thing I remember most about
this picture is that Bela Lugosi plays a man named "Paul Carruthers", and no
attempt is made as to why he speaks with a Hungarian accent. It's an OK
horror flick, but one of many reminders that the old precept "They don't make
'em like that anymore" is not a bad thing in all cases.
--
alt.flame Special Forces
"I think John Carpenter is a saint, so he's not a leftist nor a member of the
right wing." -- Dario Argento
Avoid normal situations.
> Robert Lee wrote:
[ Never underestimate the power of denial. ]
>> Oh, fuck off, you obsequious little toady. If it weren't for ass-kissing
>> and "me too" posts for members here you obviously feel do you a great favor
>> just by liking you, you'd have barely any posting record.
>>
>> PLONK right back.
> PLONK!
So, are you starting a PLONK cascade, or are you merely one of The Faithful?
Hey, Robert, how's about another film discussion after everybody on a.h.
has plonked you for dissing a member of the in-crowd and me for ruining the
illusion they're attempting to conjure? I just saw _In Which We Serve_ and
_This Happy Breed_, so you can sneer at me while I froth about how David Lean
is The Man.
Avoid normal situations.
> Bombsquad <Djangoth...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:3F8E32CA.ECE23C41
> @yahoo.com:
>> And who is Sefton again?
> Well, not part of the A-list, that's for certain. (What is it with these
> "Who are you again?" comments, like this was some kind of nineteenth-
> century gentlemen's club? It's the fucking waiter, you pansy. Tip him and
> keep talking, for the five hundredth time, about your days on the dark
> continent.)
"Gentlemen's club" is high praise, actually. I'm reading this thread and
thinking "cult".
You should have seen what happened on alt.vampyres in the summer of 1998.
(In fact, thanks to Google, you can.) There's this one gal who posts there --
really nice lady -- who made one mildly prurient joke towards some guy, to
which he responded by ferociously and unequivocally threatening to kill her.
In the ensuing flamewar, most of the rank and file of a.v. took his side
rather than hers.
The hivemind mentalities that these Usenet groups get are fucking WEIRD.
alt.flame is starting to look pretty good by comparison.
Somebody should write a horror film about it. Then again, these guys would
probably take it as a compliment...
Bombsquad
"Avoid normal situations." wrote:
> Bombsquad <Djangoth...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Robert Lee wrote:
>
> [ Never underestimate the power of denial. ]
>
> >> Oh, fuck off, you obsequious little toady. If it weren't for ass-kissing
> >> and "me too" posts for members here you obviously feel do you a great favor
> >> just by liking you, you'd have barely any posting record.
> >>
> >> PLONK right back.
>
> > PLONK!
>
> So, are you starting a PLONK cascade, or are you merely one of The Faithful?
Me, or someone else?
>
> Hey, Robert, how's about another film discussion after everybody on a.h.
> has plonked you for dissing a member of the in-crowd and me for ruining the
> illusion they're attempting to conjure? I just saw _In Which We Serve_ and
> _This Happy Breed_, so you can sneer at me while I froth about how David Lean
> is The Man.
If you prefer to me to killfile you, please let me know. I don't see the point,
but I'm perfectly willing to oblige. Beyond that, pointing out hypocrisy on the
INTRAWEB is like winning at retard basketball. Yeah for you, but otherwise, what's
the point? You're not exactly rebellious and you don't score bonus points for
standing up to some so-called "Evil Empire".
Do you honestly think that Gore-met intentionally used Robert's real email address
in the chance that some random porn spammer would graft it and send him junk mail?
Oooh, wow, hey now, it's all fun and games until somebody loses an eye. Me? I get
50 a day and I honestly don't care enough about it to form an opinion one way or
another. Is that a knock on Robert? No. But, in the grand scheme of my day, it
ranks somewhere between "pissing in the shower" and "paying a homeless man $2 to
do a funny dance".
The only thing you've accomplished by your little triple threat diatribe about the
"Alt.horror cult" is get a whole bunch of people to killfile you, thereby
gratifying your ego and solidifying yourself as the cup holder for internet
martyrs everywhere. "It's a mutual admiration society, it's a circle jerk, now
watch as I stand up to them with my mighty wit and mirthful tongue".
It's a nice show, but in the end, very pointless and very repetitive.
Cheers,
Bombsquad
Sefton
<byend.removethis...@eskimo.com> wrote:
> The hivemind mentalities that these Usenet groups get are fucking WEIRD.
>alt.flame is starting to look pretty good by comparison.
>
> Somebody should write a horror film about it. Then again, these guys would
>probably take it as a compliment...
I have a title: "The Revenge of Ringo". Ringo finds out where each one
of the "cult" lives and kills them imaginatively, drawing inspiration
from old Criswell posts.
Sefton, who knows well what gets their goat.
Brandi Weed
byend.removethis...@eskimo.com says...
> ObHorror: Okay, how about _The Devil Bat_? The thing I remember most about
> this picture is that Bela Lugosi plays a man named "Paul Carruthers", and no
> attempt is made as to why he speaks with a Hungarian accent.
Not as inexplicable as his Hungarian-accented FU WONG in The Mysterious
Mr. Wong...
[Actually, given the remapping of his land from Austria-Hungary to
Romania, would that make his accent Romanian?]
--
brandiweed at lanset dot com
John Donaldson
"Sefton" wrote
> <snip>who knows well what gets their goat.
>
HORROR OF DRACULA
(John ducks the flying faggots covered in mushy peas)
Franklin Harris
"John Donaldson" <jwd...@rcn.com> wrote in message
news:bmoj42$hg5$1...@bob.news.rcn.net...
>
> "Sefton" wrote
> > <snip>who knows well what gets their goat.
> >
> HORROR OF DRACULA
Nope. I think I used that one so much that he is inoculated.
DEDHeather94
>> Bombsquad <Djangoth...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:3F8E32CA.ECE23C41
>> @yahoo.com:
>
>>> And who is Sefton again?
>
>> Well, not part of the A-list, that's for certain. (What is it with these
>> "Who are you again?" comments, like this was some kind of nineteenth-
>> century gentlemen's club? It's the fucking waiter, you pansy. Tip him and
>> keep talking, for the five hundredth time, about your days on the dark
>> continent.)
>
> "Gentlemen's club" is high praise, actually. I'm reading this thread and
>thinking "cult".
>
> You should have seen what happened on alt.vampyres in the summer of 1998.
>(In fact, thanks to Google, you can.) There's this one gal who posts there --
>
>really nice lady -- who made one mildly prurient joke towards some guy, to
>which he responded by ferociously and unequivocally threatening to kill her.
>In the ensuing flamewar, most of the rank and file of a.v. took his side
>rather than hers.
>
> The hivemind mentalities that these Usenet groups get are fucking WEIRD.
>alt.flame is starting to look pretty good by comparison.
I agree. Have you seen soc.men?
Andrew
> (John ducks the flying faggots covered in mushy peas)
http://www.mrbrainsfaggots.com/
Mmmm...faggots.
Andrew
Andrew
> Sefton, who knows well what gets their goat.
If you know so much about goats can you please travel to
Chicago and explain to the people that a goat cannot curse a
baseball team? ;)
Andrew
The dog from that film you saw
"Andrew" <manowa...@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:bmot83$ovmmr$2...@ID-82477.news.uni-berlin.de...
in your mouth.
--
Gareth
quote of the day
'nostradamus? -sounds like a rock group to me!'
see my ebay auctions at
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V68A23FF5
Andrew
>>http://www.mrbrainsfaggots.com/
>>
>>Mmmm...faggots.
The dog from that film you saw wrote:
> in your mouth.
Best place for a faggot!
Andrew
Avoid normal situations.
> "Avoid normal situations." wrote:
>> Bombsquad <Djangoth...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > Robert Lee wrote:
>>
>> [ Never underestimate the power of denial. ]
>>
>> >> Oh, fuck off, you obsequious little toady. If it weren't for ass-kissing
>> >> and "me too" posts for members here you obviously feel do you a great favor
>> >> just by liking you, you'd have barely any posting record.
>> >>
>> >> PLONK right back.
>>
>> > PLONK!
>>
>> So, are you starting a PLONK cascade, or are you merely one of The Faithful?
> Me, or someone else?
It's quite plain that it's you.
>> Hey, Robert, how's about another film discussion after everybody on a.h.
>> has plonked you for dissing a member of the in-crowd and me for ruining the
>> illusion they're attempting to conjure? I just saw _In Which We Serve_ and
>> _This Happy Breed_, so you can sneer at me while I froth about how David Lean
>> is The Man.
> If you prefer to me to killfile you, please let me know. I don't see the point,
> but I'm perfectly willing to oblige. Beyond that, pointing out hypocrisy on the
> INTRAWEB is like winning at retard basketball.
Toleration of this sort of silliness only encourages it.
> Yeah for you, but otherwise, what's
> the point? You're not exactly rebellious and you don't score bonus points for
> standing up to some so-called "Evil Empire".
"Evil Empire"? Hee! Oh, please, try harder to flatter them, why don't you!
> Do you honestly think that Gore-met intentionally used Robert's real email address
> in the chance that some random porn spammer would graft it and send him junk mail?
No, so that he'd get Swen mail... as Lee said in the article.
That sure as hell is the way it looks, based on the evidence at hand.
> Oooh, wow, hey now, it's all fun and games until somebody loses an eye. Me? I get
> 50 a day and I honestly don't care enough about it to form an opinion one way or
> another. Is that a knock on Robert? No. But, in the grand scheme of my day, it
> ranks somewhere between "pissing in the shower" and "paying a homeless man $2 to
> do a funny dance".
> The only thing you've accomplished by your little triple threat diatribe about the
> "Alt.horror cult" is get a whole bunch of people to killfile you, thereby
> gratifying your ego and solidifying yourself as the cup holder for internet
> martyrs everywhere. "It's a mutual admiration society, it's a circle jerk, now
> watch as I stand up to them with my mighty wit and mirthful tongue".
Stand up to what? I've been posting here longer than any of them have, and
I'll probably be posting here long after they've all been spanked off the net.
> It's a nice show, but in the end, very pointless and very repetitive.
Now will you address the point, please, you bad-ass flamer, you?
ObHorror: I'll use this opportunity to point out that I saw _Bride of
Frankenstein_ at Comic Con International a few years ago, and since
Forrest J. Ackerman was there to introduce it he let me shake his
hand. Groovy! :-)
^TooL^
about the
> > "Alt.horror cult" is get a whole bunch of people to killfile you,
thereby
> > gratifying your ego and solidifying yourself as the cup holder for
internet
> > martyrs everywhere. "It's a mutual admiration society, it's a circle
jerk, now
> > watch as I stand up to them with my mighty wit and mirthful tongue".
>
> Stand up to what? I've been posting here longer than any of them have,
and
> I'll probably be posting here long after they've all been spanked off the
net.
Do you realise that this paragraph makes you look like more of an 'evil
elitist snob' than any of the 'Alt.horror cult'?
Wow, you've been here a long time. You must be cool, can i be your friend?
^TooL^
Robert Lee
<byend.removethis...@eskimo.com> wrote in
news:bmo9m8$oec1v$2...@ID-191121.news.uni-berlin.de:
> I just saw _In Which We Serve_ and
> _This Happy Breed_, so you can sneer at me while I froth about how
> David Lean is The Man.
>
What? Did I sneer at you about that, once? I can't imagine why, as I like
Lean lots.
--
--Robert
But she's not afraid to die, the people all call her Alaska
Robert Lee
> The hivemind mentalities that these Usenet groups get are fucking
> WEIRD.
> alt.flame is starting to look pretty good by comparison.
A friend I met up with at the O'Reilly open source conference this summer
turned me on to this article, which is one of the best things I've ever
read about Usenet and Internet groups in general.
http://www.shirky.com/writings/group_enemy.html
Robert Lee
news:20031017084708...@mb-m26.aol.com:
>> The hivemind mentalities that these Usenet groups get are fucking
>> WEIRD.
>>alt.flame is starting to look pretty good by comparison.
>
> I agree. Have you seen soc.men?
Ugh. I read alt.true-crime, and the soc.men assholes are always
crossposting about rape. Imagine how much fun it is right now, with the
Kobe thing.
Robert Lee
> Mr. Lee may indeed be crazy, but that doesn't make him wrong. He
> made a
> sound argument that one of the alpha males of this forum acted in a
> most unbecoming way, and supported it with evidence. This kind of "HOW
> DARE YOU!!" post is really strange, and not in a good way.
Thanks, man.
Avoid normal situations.
> "Avoid normal situations."
> <byend.removethis...@eskimo.com> wrote in
> news:bmo9m8$oec1v$2...@ID-191121.news.uni-berlin.de:
>> I just saw _In Which We Serve_ and
>> _This Happy Breed_, so you can sneer at me while I froth about how
>> David Lean is The Man.
> What? Did I sneer at you about that, once? I can't imagine why, as I like
> Lean lots.
Actually, I was being facetious. You and I don't always agree, so it
wouldn't have surprised me to find that you either hadn't seen or didn't
like Mr. Lean's work. I keep noticing that folks who dig obscure films
like to sneer at stuff that seems a little too white bread.
Besides, I'm still pretty buzzed about _In Which We Serve_, so I was
happy to have any excuse to bring it up. That's just about the best goddamn
WW2 propaganda film I've ever seen... even better than John Ford's _They
Were Expendable_.
ObHorror: Say, given the "actors who've done no horror" thread, we could
use a good "directors who've done no horror" thread, of which Mr. Lean is
a good example.
Weirdly enough, John Ford actually doesn't qualify. He's credited with co-
directing a 1919 film called _The Craving_. Heaven knows I'd be glad to see
it, but I suspect he directed it before he was John Ford, not unlike how John
Woo did _Princess Chang Ping_ before he was John Woo.
JBerg007
>
>If you know so much about goats can you please travel to
>Chicago and explain to the people that a goat cannot curse a
>baseball team? ;)
>
>Andrew
>
LOL!!!!! Amen! It's Resurrection Mary that curses the Cubs!!!!
j/k
Jo
Avoid normal situations.
> "Avoid normal situations."
> <byend.removethis...@eskimo.com> wrote in
> news:bmo95l$oec1v$1...@ID-191121.news.uni-berlin.de:
>> Mr. Lee may indeed be crazy, but that doesn't make him wrong. He
>> made a
>> sound argument that one of the alpha males of this forum acted in a
>> most unbecoming way, and supported it with evidence. This kind of "HOW
>> DARE YOU!!" post is really strange, and not in a good way.
> Thanks, man.
You're quite welcome, but there's a measure of self-interest involved here
as well. This whole "BURN THE INFIDEL" stuff is not what I want happpening on
any newsgroup in which I participate.
ObHorror: After all, the more energy we expend on fighting these silly
little flamewars, the less we have to talk about such mind-altering films
like _Les yeux sans visage_. (No remarks about my calling it by the French
title, okay? It just sounds so much better than either of the English ones,
and there's no Billy Idol association that way.) One of my favorite examples
of "horror movies the way they're supposed to be done", and one frequently
mentioned to people in casual conversation so they won't think that just
because I'm a horror fan I'm into Freddy and Jason or similar rubbish.
cailinsdad
Bombsquad
"Avoid normal situations." wrote:
> Bombsquad <Djangoth...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > "Avoid normal situations." wrote:
> >> Bombsquad <Djangoth...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> > Robert Lee wrote:
> >>
> >> [ Never underestimate the power of denial. ]
> >>
> >> >> Oh, fuck off, you obsequious little toady. If it weren't for ass-kissing
> >> >> and "me too" posts for members here you obviously feel do you a great favor
> >> >> just by liking you, you'd have barely any posting record.
> >> >>
> >> >> PLONK right back.
> >>
> >> > PLONK!
> >>
> >> So, are you starting a PLONK cascade, or are you merely one of The Faithful?
>
> > Me, or someone else?
>
> It's quite plain that it's you.
>
> >> Hey, Robert, how's about another film discussion after everybody on a.h.
> >> has plonked you for dissing a member of the in-crowd and me for ruining the
> >> illusion they're attempting to conjure? I just saw _In Which We Serve_ and
> >> _This Happy Breed_, so you can sneer at me while I froth about how David Lean
> >> is The Man.
>
> > If you prefer to me to killfile you, please let me know. I don't see the point,
> > but I'm perfectly willing to oblige. Beyond that, pointing out hypocrisy on the
> > INTRAWEB is like winning at retard basketball.
>
> Toleration of this sort of silliness only encourages it.
Because morality and good behavior is what the internet thrives on. Because most people
choose to be on their best behavior when writing to hundreds of anonymous strangers.
Sarcasm aside, there is a difference between freedom of speech and freedom of listening.
I honestly don't take care if somebody killfiles me or not. It means somebody doesn't
want to hear me anymore, and that's their loss. I don't take it personally, nor should
anyone else.
>
> > Yeah for you, but otherwise, what's
> > the point? You're not exactly rebellious and you don't score bonus points for
> > standing up to some so-called "Evil Empire".
>
> "Evil Empire"? Hee! Oh, please, try harder to flatter them, why don't you!
Simply paraphrasing what 9 million trolls have declared here. Your complaints are like a
script, like an old episode of MATLOCK.You're not saying anything new. I've heard it a
thousand times in the past, and I'll hear it a thousand times in the future.
>
> > Do you honestly think that Gore-met intentionally used Robert's real email address
> > in the chance that some random porn spammer would graft it and send him junk mail?
>
> No, so that he'd get Swen mail... as Lee said in the article.
>
> That sure as hell is the way it looks, based on the evidence at hand.
As I'm sure Gore literally knows the programmer and instructed said programmer to
construct the virus and personally infect Robert Lee's computer. Otherwise, it sounds
paranoid to me. Beyond that, I honestly don't care enough about it to bothered fuck all
to deal with it. The trials and tribulations of Robert's computer...and the love hate
relationship between a Robert and Gore is as important to me as the littlest Romanian
orphan who could do somersaults. I thought about it - Made a sandwich, didn't have any
provolone cheese and then went to bed.
>
> > Oooh, wow, hey now, it's all fun and games until somebody loses an eye. Me? I get
> > 50 a day and I honestly don't care enough about it to form an opinion one way or
> > another. Is that a knock on Robert? No. But, in the grand scheme of my day, it
> > ranks somewhere between "pissing in the shower" and "paying a homeless man $2 to
> > do a funny dance".
>
> > The only thing you've accomplished by your little triple threat diatribe about the
> > "Alt.horror cult" is get a whole bunch of people to killfile you, thereby
> > gratifying your ego and solidifying yourself as the cup holder for internet
> > martyrs everywhere. "It's a mutual admiration society, it's a circle jerk, now
> > watch as I stand up to them with my mighty wit and mirthful tongue".
>
> Stand up to what? I've been posting here longer than any of them have, and
> I'll probably be posting here long after they've all been spanked off the net.
>
> > It's a nice show, but in the end, very pointless and very repetitive.
>
> Now will you address the point, please, you bad-ass flamer, you?
What point? Alt.horror is mean? People are mean to each other? People ignore each other?
The internet isn't fair? Yeah, it's all pretty true, so get over it.
Bombsquad
Jordan Garren
Franklin Donaldson whatever. Hell, Trotsky is superior than you. That
fucker is determined.
So you all DO have a Napoleanic complex.... interesting.
> I have no problem with Robert, I think he's a smart guy. I was just tired
of reading the same arguments over and over again.
But you? You're pathetic and backwards and a miserable fucking wretch. You
are the ultimate symbol of fan boy wanking at it's finest. A festering,
malignant tumor on the canker sore of life.
::sniffle:: That's the nicest thing anyone here has ever said to me! Thanks!
Anyway, I feel sorry for you. Seeing as you have complete disdain for me
(for no reason whatsoever), you've wasted about 5 minutes of your life,
typing up this e-mail, giggling all the way, hoping that I'd either cry or
try and come up with something to top you (which I couldn't since you're
superior to me and all...). Ultimately, you've wasted 5 minutes of your
life.... completely... and utterly. So I have the last laugh!
MWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA! FOOL!
> Jordan, you and your rogue reviewers are the cinematic equivalent of stage
3 cancer, and I have not seen a single post, a single utterance of ANYTHING
before your name that might lead me to believe otherwise. Inquisitions are
formed because of people like you, because you can only be rooted out by
fire.
Stage 2 cancer, and there's no reason to show ill will towards my fellow
reviewers. "The Inquisition.... what a show! The Inquisition, here we go!
Wish you were wishin'... that we'd go awaaayyyy! The Inquisition is here and
it's here to stay!"
> You suck. Tomorrow, you will suck. Next week, you will suck. Your family
sucks and your kids will inevitably SUCK. I guess what I'm trying to say
is...find a new hobby.
I enjoy my hobby just fine and will continue on with it wether you like it
or not. And you've never met me or my family or my kids (from the future) so
I'd prefer it if you'd refrain from saying that they SUCK. I'm a rather
agreeable fellow and easy to get along with. There's no need for these
unpleasantries at all.
> Like prison rape.
Well if I ever do enjoy a visit to a state penitentiary, I'll probably
unwillingly start up this hobby. As I am a law abiding citizen, don't think
I'll ever have a chance to do so. OH DARN!
> A moment. Yes, upon further reflection, you still suck.
Glad your pondering almost brought you to the correct conclusion.
"You are dead ... to me....."
- Jordan
--
The B-Movie Film Vault
http://www.geocities.com/jrgdawg/
Fighting the Good Fight For B-Movie Lovers Everywhere Since June 5th, 2000!
Also a Proud Member (and Founder) of The Rogue Reviewers:
http://www.roguereviewers.com
Scabigail
> Subject: Gore, Knock It the Fuck Off
> Newsgroups: News East:alt.horror
>
> I wondered why I was getting a ton of Swen mail all of a sudden, when it
> had died down of late. So I got an idea, and went looking on Google for
> my
> non-munged email address.
>
> And guess what? There are a couple of new ones, since after Swen hit, and
> after I posted all that advice here about not using your actual email
> address on Usenet in the future.
>
> And here they are:
>
> http://snurl.com/2opk
>
> and
>
> http://snurl.com/2opl
>
> I suppose you could try to make some excuse, Gore, about your posting
> software, except you fucked up in the first post and removed the first
> bracket around my email address, too, which a filter wouldn't have done.
> Note that in the second, you're actually quoting Pig's response to me and
> in his response, my "snippitydoodah" is intact.
>
> I guess you felt like I deserved this because I'm a "racist" or
> something, although one of the posts precedes that whole fracas, so I
> dunno. Whatever rationalization for this your fevered little brain came
> up with, this is petty beyond belief and a real pain in the ass for me.
> Thanks a lot, shithead. I'm in the middle of a job, now, where I'm
> communicating mainly via email and now I've got to deal with umpteen
> fucking mails with attachments again every day. (No, I don't use the same
> address for work, but I use the same mail app.)
>
> I don't believe what a pathetic little bitch you are, Gore. I may not
> like you, but I would have thought you above something this childish and
> destructive.
>
> Oh, and try and keep in mind when you respond that I have your real email
> address here.
>
> "You stupid fuckin’ cunt. You idiot. Who ever told you that you could
> work with men? ...you fucking child."
Silly me. I expected that this would be an interesting discussion on the
pervasive use of special effects in the modern horror film. Instead, it
is just more petty squabbling.
Jordan Garren
Hey Robert, very interesting stuff. Thanks for the link... I'm finding this
to be quite fascinating!
Varizo
hes suposed to hav done.
But i spose he could be on holiday or somthing tho.
V.
Avoid normal situations.
> "Avoid normal situations." wrote:
[ Bomberino dances around the issues. ]
Oh, forget it.
Avoid normal situations.
> "Avoid normal situations."
> <byend.removethis...@eskimo.com> wrote in
> news:bmoaf6$oec1v$3...@ID-191121.news.uni-berlin.de:
>> The hivemind mentalities that these Usenet groups get are fucking
>> WEIRD.
>> alt.flame is starting to look pretty good by comparison.
> A friend I met up with at the O'Reilly open source conference this summer
> turned me on to this article, which is one of the best things I've ever
> read about Usenet and Internet groups in general.
> http://www.shirky.com/writings/group_enemy.html
Usenet is dead? That's news to me (so to speak).
Quite an interesting article, though. Too bad it didn't get into the degree
of mass hysteria I mentioned previously.
Avoid normal situations.
> byend.removethis...@eskimo.com says...
>> ObHorror: Okay, how about _The Devil Bat_? The thing I remember most about
>> this picture is that Bela Lugosi plays a man named "Paul Carruthers", and no
>> attempt is made as to why he speaks with a Hungarian accent.
> Not as inexplicable as his Hungarian-accented FU WONG in The Mysterious
> Mr. Wong...
Now *that's* weird.
Do you suppose he was viewed by audiences as an American who talks funny,
the way Michael Caine is today? Or was it a case of significantly lower
standards wrt racial impersonations (cf. Alec Guinness as a Japanese in
_A Majority of One_)?