UK TV Tonight!...
ReVulse
Apparently tonight at 10pm, Sky1 are broadcasting a live seance in which
conman and fraud Derek Acorah will try to contact Michael Jackson.
Surely it has to be a joke?
If it goes ahead, it should be funny as fuck.
--
#Andy#
http://www.last.fm/user/revulse_1968/
"all your glad-handing is going to be wasted effort
as soon as I drive ReVulse and the others permanently
off alt.horror." - Avoid Normal Situations (7th May 2009)
Simon (Dark Angel)
"ReVulse" <ReV...@psychaoticREMOVETHIS.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in message...
> Apparently tonight at 10pm, Sky1 are broadcasting a live seance in which
> conman and fraud Derek Acorah will try to contact Michael Jackson.
> Surely it has to be a joke?
> If it goes ahead, it should be funny as fuck.
Holy shit, you're not wrong either.
This has to be some sort of crazy stuny!
--
Best Wishes
Simon (aka Dark Angel)
Dark Angel's Realm of Horror - http://www.realmofhorror.co.uk
Dr Walpurgis
through my website> said:
>> Apparently tonight at 10pm, Sky1 are broadcasting a live seance in which
>> conman and fraud Derek Acorah will try to contact Michael Jackson.
>> Surely it has to be a joke?
>> If it goes ahead, it should be funny as fuck.
>
> Holy shit, you're not wrong either.
> This has to be some sort of crazy stuny!
Britain has GONE DOWN THE TOILET.
LORD REITH must be TURNING IN HIS GRAVE.
--
"I'm clearly mentally unsound" - Avoid normal situations, 22/8/09
ReVulse
> "ReVulse" <ReV...@psychaoticREMOVETHIS.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in message...
>> Apparently tonight at 10pm, Sky1 are broadcasting a live seance in
>> which conman and fraud Derek Acorah will try to contact Michael
>> Jackson. Surely it has to be a joke?
>> If it goes ahead, it should be funny as fuck.
>
> Holy shit, you're not wrong either.
>
> This has to be some sort of crazy stuny!
I wouldn't normally watch shite like this as it just encourages channels
to give the cunt airtime, but the potential for him to make a complete
tit of himself is huge.
Hopefully, he'll be "possessed" by Jackson which should be hilarious.
Cha'mone Motherfucker.
The dog from that film you saw
"ReVulse" <ReV...@psychaoticREMOVETHIS.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:7lip9vF...@mid.individual.net...
>
> Apparently tonight at 10pm, Sky1 are broadcasting a live seance in which
> conman and fraud Derek Acorah will try to contact Michael Jackson.
>
> Surely it has to be a joke?
>
> If it goes ahead, it should be funny as fuck.
that's what happens when you dont read the EPG correctly - i read it as him
contacting jack the ripper :(
--
Gareth.
that fly...... is your magic wand....
http://dsbdsb.mybrute.com
you fight better when you have a bear!
Killer Kane
"ReVulse" wrote:
> Apparently tonight at 10pm, Sky1 are broadcasting a live seance in which
> conman and fraud Derek Acorah will try to contact Michael Jackson.
>
> Surely it has to be a joke?
>
> If it goes ahead, it should be funny as fuck.
I saw 20 minutes of it and recorded the rest. I was watching the comedy
showcase thingy on 4. Fucking brilliant - I thank you.
Hexen666
> conman and fraud Derek Acorah
I quote "Mary loves Dick!"
Fake fucking scouse twat! Watch til the end.............
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uD0dPhr9cQ
Hex
The dog from that film you saw
"Killer Kane" <gor...@large.com> wrote in message
news:nVkJm.141887$k74....@newsfe17.ams2...
Turns out that what i recorded was derek acorah trying to get in touch with
guy fawkes - it was rubbish.
Avoid normal situations.
[..]
> >> Apparently tonight at 10pm, Sky1 are broadcasting a live seance in
> >> which conman and fraud Derek Acorah will try to contact Michael
> >> Jackson. Surely it has to be a joke?
> >> If it goes ahead, it should be funny as fuck.
> >
> > Holy shit, you're not wrong either.
> >
> > This has to be some sort of crazy stuny!
> I wouldn't normally watch shite like this
Yeah right.
> as it just encourages channels
> to give the cunt airtime, but the potential for him to make a complete
> tit of himself is huge.
You do know that TV programs are often deliberately designed to be
ridiculous, don't you? For one thing, it gets more people to watch them.
For another, it makes the viewer feel smug and superior, which therefore
makes him more likely to keep watching, and therefore more likely to be
receptive to the products hawked in the commercials (the real programming).
In other words, you're playing right into their hands, you miserable pile
of lark's vomit. I am not familiar with this Acorah person and I can't speak
of aforementioned potential, but I am highly familiar with YOUR potential
for making a tit of yourself. In fact, you just realized it.
--
alt.flame Special Forces
"I do not consider it an insult, but rather a compliment to be called an
agnostic. I do not pretend to know where many ignorant men are sure -- that
is all that agnosticism means." -- Clarence Darrow
Avoid normal situations.
Sucker.
ReVulse
> I am not familiar with this Acorah person and I can't
> speak of aforementioned potential, but I am highly familiar with YOUR
> potential for making a tit of yourself. In fact, you just realized it.
Your susceptibility to other people's words hasn't gone unnoticed:
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.horror/msg/a87aae1c564051c4
Avoid normal situations.
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:25:49 +0000, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
> > I am not familiar with this Acorah person and I can't
> > speak of aforementioned potential, but I am highly familiar with YOUR
> > potential for making a tit of yourself. In fact, you just realized it.
> Your susceptibility to other people's words hasn't gone unnoticed:
> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.horror/msg/a87aae1c564051c4
Nice non sequitur.
Besides, you never convincingly established that TWL was actually being
sarcastic.
ReVulse
> ReVulse <ReV...@psychaoticremovethis.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:25:49 +0000, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
>
>> > I am not familiar with this Acorah person and I can't speak of
>> > aforementioned potential, but I am highly familiar with YOUR
>> > potential for making a tit of yourself. In fact, you just realized
>> > it.
>
>> Your susceptibility to other people's words hasn't gone unnoticed:
>
>> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.horror/msg/a87aae1c564051c4
>
> Nice non sequitur.
>
> Besides, you never convincingly established that TWL was actually
> being
> sarcastic.
LOL! Are you actually familiar with anyone who posts here?
Avoid normal situations.
> On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 21:48:37 +0000, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
[..]
> >> > I am not familiar with this Acorah person and I can't speak of
> >> > aforementioned potential, but I am highly familiar with YOUR
> >> > potential for making a tit of yourself. In fact, you just realized
> >> > it.
> >
> >> Your susceptibility to other people's words hasn't gone unnoticed:
> >
> >> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.horror/msg/a87aae1c564051c4
> >
> > Nice non sequitur.
> >
> > Besides, you never convincingly established that TWL was actually
> > being
> > sarcastic.
> LOL!
< cue Richard Schultz >
> Are you actually familiar with anyone who posts here?
I guess I really do have to spell it out for you.
Do you actually read any articles on this group besides the ones your pals
tell you to read?
--
alt.flame Special Forces
"If you're a weird, outcast teenager, keep in mind that the people who are
making your life miserable -- these are the happiest days of their lives. When
you are just starting to come into your own, they'll be settling into their
default careers and default lives, wondering why they're not happy."
-- Poppy Z. Brite
ReVulse
> ReVulse <ReV...@psychaoticremovethis.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>> On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 21:48:37 +0000, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
>
> [..]
>
>> >> > I am not familiar with this Acorah person and I can't speak of
>> >> > aforementioned potential, but I am highly familiar with YOUR
>> >> > potential for making a tit of yourself. In fact, you just realized
>> >> > it.
>> >
>> >> Your susceptibility to other people's words hasn't gone unnoticed:
>> >
>> >> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.horror/msg/a87aae1c564051c4
>> >
>> > Nice non sequitur.
>> >
>> > Besides, you never convincingly established that TWL was actually
>> > being
>> > sarcastic.
>
>> LOL!
>
> < cue Richard Schultz >
>
>> Are you actually familiar with anyone who posts here?
>
> I guess I really do have to spell it out for you.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/yl3zn9y
You've completely lost it. That link proves my point rather than yours.
> Do you actually read any articles on this group besides the ones your
> pals
> tell you to read?
You mean like the one you linked to above? - The one where you responded
to something I said and I replied in the same thread? No, I obviously
didn't read that one at all, you fucking twat.
Dr Walpurgis
>>>>> I am not familiar with this Acorah person and I can't speak of
>>>>> aforementioned potential, but I am highly familiar with YOUR
>>>>> potential for making a tit of yourself. In fact, you just realized
>>>>> it.
>>>>
>>>> Your susceptibility to other people's words hasn't gone unnoticed:
>>>> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.horror/msg/a87aae1c564051c4
>>>
>>> Nice non sequitur.
>>> Besides, you never convincingly established that TWL was actually
>>> being sarcastic.
>>
>> LOL! Are you actually familiar with anyone who posts here?
>
> < cue Richard Schultz >
FAQ #12
http://www.richardschultz.com/about/faq/index.asp
--
"Yes, yes, I know, monotonous" - Avoid normal situations, 27/7/09
Avoid normal situations.
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:25:15 +0000, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
[..]
> >> >> > I am not familiar with this Acorah person and I can't speak of
> >> >> > aforementioned potential, but I am highly familiar with YOUR
> >> >> > potential for making a tit of yourself. In fact, you just realized
> >> >> > it.
> >> >
> >> >> Your susceptibility to other people's words hasn't gone unnoticed:
> >> >
> >> >> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.horror/msg/a87aae1c564051c4
> >> >
> >> > Nice non sequitur.
> >> >
> >> > Besides, you never convincingly established that TWL was actually
> >> > being
> >> > sarcastic.
> >
> >> LOL!
> >
> > < cue Richard Schultz >
> >
> >> Are you actually familiar with anyone who posts here?
> >
> > I guess I really do have to spell it out for you.
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/yl3zn9y
> You've completely lost it.
I don't think I'll miss it, either.
> That link proves my point rather than yours.
What point? "You're a nutter"? I already won that argument ages ago.
FAQ #5.
> > Do you actually read any articles on this group besides the ones your
> > pals
> > tell you to read?
> You mean like the one you linked to above? - The one where you responded
> to something I said and I replied in the same thread? No, I obviously
> didn't read that one at all, you fucking twat.
You sure as hell didn't remember the content.
Dr Walpurgis
>>>> Are you actually familiar with anyone who posts here?
>>>
>>> I guess I really do have to spell it out for you.
>>>
>>> http://tinyurl.com/yl3zn9y
>>
>> You've completely lost it.
>
> I don't think I'll miss it, either.
>
>> That link proves my point rather than yours.
>
> What point? "You're a nutter"? I already won that argument ages ago.
> FAQ #5.
http://www.tinyurl.com/anusfaq5
--
"I'm going to drive you all out of here." - Avoid normal situations, 10/9/09
ReVulse
What the fuck are you babbling about? - Go on, humour me, I can't wait to
hear what you think that link shows other than a typical exchange with
TWL.
Although I'm guessing that you're probably a bit reluctant to explain
yourself, because it must be dawning on you that you've made yet another
fuck up.
Dr Walpurgis
<ReV...@psychaoticREMOVETHIS.fsnet.co.uk> said:
>>>> Do you actually read any articles on this group besides the ones
>>>> your pals tell you to read?
>>>
>>> You mean like the one you linked to above? - The one where you
>>> responded to something I said and I replied in the same thread? No, I
>>> obviously didn't read that one at all, you fucking twat.
>>
>> You sure as hell didn't remember the content.
>
> What the fuck are you babbling about? - Go on, humour me, I can't wait to
> hear what you think that link shows other than a typical exchange with
> TWL.
> Although I'm guessing that you're probably a bit reluctant to explain
> yourself, because it must be dawning on you that you've made yet another
> fuck up.
http://tinyurl.com/anuspaintedintoacorner
--
"I am as predictable as the sunrise" - Avoid normal situations, 12/7/09
bod
"Dr Walpurgis" <burke.d...@cunting.hun> wrote in message
news:he0gom$skh$1...@drwalpurgis.motzarella.org...
LOL!!
--
regards from BOD!
"dont worry yoko, its only a friggin water pist...."
JOHN LENNON 1980
http://www.myspace.com/bodland
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=bodland
Avoid normal situations.
It shows that I already stated years ago that I find White Lady, whatever
her current handle, dull as dust. I rarely read anything she posts.
> Although I'm guessing that you're probably a bit reluctant to explain
> yourself, because it must be dawning on you that you've made yet another
> fuck up.
Assumes facts not in evidence.
ReVulse
So now you claim to know what TWL is like and yet you still missed her
blatant (and trademark) sarcasm? Did you even read what she said to me in
the link you posted? Did that not give you a clue that her compliment
about my anagram may not have been entirely serious?
You're not really very smart, are you?
Avoid normal situations.
My memory of her is fading fast. Hopefully, it'll fade faster.
> Did you even read what she said to me in
> the link you posted?
No. Only what you quoted.
> Did that not give you a clue that her compliment
> about my anagram may not have been entirely serious?
OK, I'll come out and say it directly: I didn't read her original article.
> You're not really very smart, are you?
As has been demonstrated on many previous occasions, I have more brains and
talent in my elbows than you do in your entire body.
I am continuously reminded, in our merry little exchanges of late, of stuff
like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNIwct1I9CI
The Republicans here in the US are very, very bitter about having been shown
to be wrong so often and having gotten their asses kicked in recent elections
right up between their shoulder blades, so they focus on making mountains out
of molehills, and spinning them their own direction as much as possible.
Hearing Mr. Beck and Mr. Limbaugh spinning the rejection of Chicago by the
Olympics as some kind of global defeat for Obama is truly sad, but that's what
I've come to expect from those people.
Similarly, you and your pals are very, very bitter about getting your asses
kicked in major flamewars by yours truly, and you're no doubt even more bitter
about your failure to get the entire newsgroup to ignore me away; that was
proof positive that, no, you don't control the entire group after all. So you
spend enormous amounts of time spewing garbage with ridiculously weak, if any,
factual basis ("STALKER", "RAIN MAN", etc., etc., etc.) and making mountains
out of molehills ("Oh, look, he misused a word!", etc.) like this one.
This thread really doesn't make up for your continuing defeats... and it
sure as hell is no match for somebody having made a rock-solid case for why
you need to be permanently ejected from alt.horror... so much so that neither
you nor anyone so declared a future removal can gainsay even one word of it.
But you just can't let it go.
Whatever. I'm just going to keep pounding on you until you go away. I don't
know how much longer this campaign is going to go on, but I guarantee that
I'll enjoy it much more than you will.
Dr Walpurgis
> I'm just going to keep pounding on you until you go away. I don't
> know how much longer this campaign is going to go on, but I guarantee that
> I'll enjoy it much more than you will.
ANuS FAIL: MONTH 17
--
"This is even more lame than usual than you." - Avoid normal
situations, 15/5/09
ReVulse
Sounds like a hasty change of subject.
> Similarly, you and your pals are very, very bitter about getting your
> asses
> kicked in major flamewars by yours truly
Really? You're the one backpedalling.
> and you're no doubt even more
> bitter about your failure to get the entire newsgroup to ignore me away;
> that was proof positive that, no, you don't control the entire group
> after all.
You're the one who claims there is a controlling clique, remember?
> So you spend enormous amounts of time spewing garbage with
> ridiculously weak, if any, factual basis ("STALKER", "RAIN MAN", etc.,
> etc., etc.) and making mountains out of molehills ("Oh, look, he misused
> a word!", etc.) like this one.
And you never pick up on spelling or punctuation errors, do you?
> But you just can't let it go.
LOL! And what is your very next sentence?
> Whatever. I'm just going to keep pounding on you until you go away.
I think you need a break. All this humiliation can't be good for you.
Dr Walpurgis
<ReV...@psychaoticREMOVETHIS.fsnet.co.uk> said:
Far from driving anyone else off this group, he's clearly driving
himself to SUICIDE.
Normally I would be sympathetic - that's just the kind of guy I am -
but in his case it would be A MERCY.
Avoid normal situations.
> On 2009-11-20 01:37:16 +0000, ANuS said:
> > I'm just going to keep pounding on you until you go away. I don't
> > know how much longer this campaign is going to go on, but I guarantee that
> > I'll enjoy it much more than you will.
> ANuS FAIL: MONTH 17
A helpful rule of thumb in any military endeavor: KISS (Keep It Simple,
Stupid).
It doesn't get much simpler or more elegant than, "I'm just going to keep
pounding on you until you go away". You, however, keep on trying to complicate
the matter by introducing clocks. Not once did I ever say that I was going to
eject you by a certain time, or date.
QED. Keep flailing, you juvenile little worm.
Avoid normal situations.
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:37:16 +0000, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
[ one of the subjects that ReVulse is avoiding, deleted }
> >> >> >> > Do you actually read any articles on this group besides the
> >> >> >> > ones your pals
> >> >> >> > tell you to read?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> You mean like the one you linked to above? - The one where you
> >> >> >> responded to something I said and I replied in the same thread?
> >> >> >> No, I obviously didn't read that one at all, you fucking twat.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > You sure as hell didn't remember the content.
> >> >
> >> >> What the fuck are you babbling about? - Go on, humour me, I can't
> >> >> wait to hear what you think that link shows other than a typical
> >> >> exchange with TWL.
> >> >
> >> > It shows that I already stated years ago that I find White Lady,
> >> > whatever
> >> > her current handle, dull as dust. I rarely read anything she posts.
> >
> >> So now you claim to know what TWL is like and yet you still missed her
> >> blatant (and trademark) sarcasm?
> >
> > My memory of her is fading fast. Hopefully, it'll fade faster.
> >
> >> Did you even read what she said to me in the link you posted?
> >
> > No. Only what you quoted.
> "Do you actually read any articles on this group"
Snobbery is underrated. Snobs set the standards for excellence in
everything ((tm) Andy Rooney).
> >> Did that not give you a clue that her compliment about my anagram may
> >> not have been entirely serious?
> >
> > OK, I'll come out and say it directly: I didn't read her original
> > article.
> "Do you actually read any articles on this group"
Ibid.
> >> You're not really very smart, are you?
> >
> > As has been demonstrated on many previous occasions, I have more
> > brains and
> > talent in my elbows than you do in your entire body.
> >
> > I am continuously reminded, in our merry little exchanges of late, of
> > stuff
> > like this:
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNIwct1I9CI
> >
> > The Republicans here in the US are very, very bitter
> Sounds like a hasty change of subject.
But it isn't.
> > Similarly, you and your pals are very, very bitter about getting your
> > asses
> > kicked in major flamewars by yours truly
> Really? You're the one backpedalling.
What backpedal? It's your responsibility to post evidence that TWL was
being sarcastic, which you have failed to do.
> > and you're no doubt even more
> > bitter about your failure to get the entire newsgroup to ignore me away;
> > that was proof positive that, no, you don't control the entire group
> > after all.
> You're the one who claims there is a controlling clique, remember?
Straw man. I claim that there's a clique who *think* they control the
group.
> > So you spend enormous amounts of time spewing garbage with
> > ridiculously weak, if any, factual basis ("STALKER", "RAIN MAN", etc.,
> > etc., etc.) and making mountains out of molehills ("Oh, look, he misused
> > a word!", etc.) like this one.
> And you never pick up on spelling or punctuation errors, do you?
After all the "RAIN MAN" bullshit, pointing out how much better my command
of the language is than yours is just irresistible.
> > But you just can't let it go.
> LOL!
< cue Richard Schultz >
> And what is your very next sentence?
>
> > Whatever. I'm just going to keep pounding on you until you go away.
With great power comes great responsibility. :-) I should have started
flaming you morons out of here years ago.
> I think you need a break. All this humiliation can't be good for you.
...a falsehood that you keep implying and insinuating.
"I think you need a break." Heh. Yet another sign that, for people who are
always claiming to have won every flamewar, you seem awfully anxious for this
one to end.
It took me years, but I finally figured it out: you and your pals, like
most people, NEED the illusions. You NEED the lies.
I don't know what the real lives of people like you, Bod, Walpurgis, et al.,
are, but I do know one thing: if any of you had any real status in life, or
if your situations were even remotely desirable, you wouldn't need to play
these sorts of games on newsgroups... just like it never occurred to me that
grown men and women would pull this sort of shit until Robert Lee pointed it
out in 2003. I can just imagine the psychological RL consequences when it all
inevitably collapses on you... just like how Lee himself needs to believe that
his pot habit is harmless, that he's not really a writer even though he has
had stories published, that it isn't healthy to interact with people online
because all the bad people are exclusively on the Internet, etc., etc., etc.
... because, if he ever faces the bald truth about what he is, and to how
little his entire life has amounted, he's going to cover himself with tabasco
sauce, wander out into the Florida swamps, and feed himself to the gators.
I never dreamed that there were people as fucked up as you are... at least,
in the *way* that you are fucked up... until just a few short years ago, and
I was considered unusually cynical even as an adolescent. This is because I
am advanced far beyond your pathetic hivemind mentality. It's a little like
how I never knew that there were urine fetishists until college, and even
then when I first encountered alt.sex.fetish.watersports, at first I thought
it was yet another joke alt.* group.
Dr Walpurgis
>>> I'm just going to keep pounding on you until you go away. I don't
>>> know how much longer this campaign is going to go on, but I guarantee that
>>> I'll enjoy it much more than you will.
>>
>> ANuS FAIL: MONTH 17
>
> Not once did I ever say that I was going to eject you by a certain
> time, or date.
For the GLARINGLY OBVIOUS reason that you are QUITE INCAPABLE of it.
But the sight of the ANuS FAIL ODOMETER, ticking round inexorably, is a
SATISFYING one for alt.horror to observe. Every month your "designated
targets" ("*snigger*") are still CHEERFULLY PRESENT AND CORRECT, is
ANOTHER month in which WE WON and YOU LOST.
Face it, Jacky son. The whole business is a TEXT BOOK EXAMPLE of why
you're a RANK AMATEUR. You made ONE HELL of a STRATEGIC BLUNDER. And I
intend to continue to RUB YOUR SNOUT in it.
TICK, TICK, TICK, TICK, TICK . . .
ReVulse
> ReVulse <ReV...@psychaoticremovethis.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:37:16 +0000, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
>
> [ one of the subjects that ReVulse is avoiding, deleted }
What subject am I avoiding?
I note you used a square bracket at the beginning and a brace at the end.
I assume this was intentional?
>
>> >> >> >> > Do you actually read any articles on this group besides
>> >> >> >> > the ones your pals
>> >> >> >> > tell you to read?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> You mean like the one you linked to above? - The one where you
>> >> >> >> responded to something I said and I replied in the same
>> >> >> >> thread? No, I obviously didn't read that one at all, you
>> >> >> >> fucking twat.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > You sure as hell didn't remember the content.
>> >> >
>> >> >> What the fuck are you babbling about? - Go on, humour me, I can't
>> >> >> wait to hear what you think that link shows other than a typical
>> >> >> exchange with TWL.
>> >> >
>> >> > It shows that I already stated years ago that I find White Lady,
>> >> > whatever
>> >> > her current handle, dull as dust. I rarely read anything she
>> >> > posts.
>> >
>> >> So now you claim to know what TWL is like and yet you still missed
>> >> her blatant (and trademark) sarcasm?
>> >
>> > My memory of her is fading fast. Hopefully, it'll fade faster.
>> >
>> >> Did you even read what she said to me in the link you posted?
>> >
>> > No. Only what you quoted.
>
>> "Do you actually read any articles on this group"
>
> Snobbery is underrated. Snobs set the standards for excellence in
> everything ((tm) Andy Rooney).
An attempt to ignore the fact that you have once again been hoisted by
your own petard.
>
>> > Similarly, you and your pals are very, very bitter about getting
>> > your asses
>> > kicked in major flamewars by yours truly
>
>> Really? You're the one backpedalling.
>
> What backpedal? It's your responsibility to post evidence that TWL was
> being sarcastic, which you have failed to do.
Why do you always require proof of the bleeding obvious?
>> > and you're no doubt even more
>> > bitter about your failure to get the entire newsgroup to ignore me
>> > away; that was proof positive that, no, you don't control the entire
>> > group after all.
>
>> You're the one who claims there is a controlling clique, remember?
>
> Straw man. I claim that there's a clique who *think* they control the
> group.
Straw man. The clique is your invention regardless of its activity or
intentions.
>
>> > So you spend enormous amounts of time spewing garbage with
>> > ridiculously weak, if any, factual basis ("STALKER", "RAIN MAN",
>> > etc., etc., etc.) and making mountains out of molehills ("Oh, look,
>> > he misused a word!", etc.) like this one.
>
>> And you never pick up on spelling or punctuation errors, do you?
>
> After all the "RAIN MAN" bullshit, pointing out how much better my
> command
> of the language is than yours is just irresistible.
Hypocrite. You can't have one rule for you and another rule for everyone
else. If you pick up on people's errors, then it's only fair that your
errors should be highlighted also.
> It took me years, but I finally figured it out
That seems to be your usual timescale.
> I don't know what the real lives of people like you, Bod, Walpurgis,
> et al.,
> are, but I do know one thing: if any of you had any real status in life,
> or if your situations were even remotely desirable, you wouldn't need to
> play these sorts of games on newsgroups
LOL! Do you ever read what you write?
> ... just like it never occurred
> to me that grown men and women would pull this sort of shit until Robert
> Lee
Stalker!
<irrelevant drivel snipped>
Dr Walpurgis
<ReV...@psychaoticREMOVETHIS.fsnet.co.uk> said:
>> [ one of the subjects that ReVulse is avoiding, deleted }
>
> I note you used a square bracket at the beginning and a brace at the end.
What a SPACKER. Too busy FOAMING AT THE MOUTH to TYPE RIGHT. Perhaps
his HEAD STICK needs replacing?
Avoid normal situations.
> On 2009-11-20 19:10:03 +0000, ANuS said:
[..]
> >>> I'm just going to keep pounding on you until you go away. I don't
> >>> know how much longer this campaign is going to go on, but I guarantee that
> >>> I'll enjoy it much more than you will.
> >>
> >> ANuS FAIL: MONTH 17
> >
> > Not once did I ever say that I was going to eject you by a certain
> > time, or date.
> For the GLARINGLY OBVIOUS reason that you are QUITE INCAPABLE of it.
Another of your dishonest debating tactics: state something with no basis
in fact, then act like it's just sooooooooooooooooooo obvious. As if mere
conviction and lung power were enough. (Maybe for you and your pals, but not
for the folks who built Usenet, and for *whom* it was built. Not for folks who
actually have more than three neurons to rub together.)
You, of course, don't want to remember the evidence to the contrary I
already posted, but that's all the more reason to remind you:
Haushalter was a research scientist for NEC in New Jersey, and a years-long
veteran of alt.flame. He was a much smarter and much tougher man than you, yet
I broke *him*. Therefore, I will inevitably break you. That's just simple
deductive logic.
And just to put the icing on the cake, here's my elaboration on the idea...
which you couldn't rebut in any way, so you only followed up with "A BITTER
MAN", as if that actually proved or even said anything:
Haushalter knew that everyone would yell "spank" after he vanished. That
didn't matter. It just wasn't a voluntary action on his part.
I also already said that spanking is an inexact science, and that I couldn't
say, exactly, when you would, ah, depart totally of your own volition (that's
what you'll tell everybody, and maintain to your grave, anyway). Hell, Bill
Palmer and James Koput, also formerly of alt.flame, were even more pathetic
than you, yet they stuck around, despite getting bodyslammed by everyone, for
years. I think that was largely because they had nothing to which to be
spanked, IYKWIM,AITYD. (<--- Large hint here.)
So by all means keep wittering on and on about clocks, even though all that
is sensationally irrelevant. You know how you keep deleting very large
sections of my posts that you don't want to answer? Here, I'll just leave in
the rest of yours, in its full unedited glory, just so everyone can gawk at
your confused, garbled thought process, and your wit that couldn't cut hot
butter:
> But the sight of the ANuS FAIL ODOMETER, ticking round inexorably, is a
> SATISFYING one for alt.horror to observe. Every month your "designated
> targets" ("*snigger*") are still CHEERFULLY PRESENT AND CORRECT, is
> ANOTHER month in which WE WON and YOU LOST.
> Face it, Jacky son. The whole business is a TEXT BOOK EXAMPLE of why
> you're a RANK AMATEUR. You made ONE HELL of a STRATEGIC BLUNDER. And I
> intend to continue to RUB YOUR SNOUT in it.
> TICK, TICK, TICK, TICK, TICK . . .
> --
> "I am as predictable as the sunrise" - Avoid normal situations, 12/7/09
There. Wasn't that fun?
Now respond with, "A BITTER MAN," and only that. Go ahead, I dare you.
--
alt.flame "and not even one comment on a .sig of one of the former alt.horror
regulars that you and the other retards have bored away. Tsk, tsk, tsk"
Dr Walpurgis
> There. Wasn't that fun?
>
> Now respond with, "A BITTER MAN,"...
"RAIN MAN", LOL.
> ...and only that. Go ahead, I dare you.
TICK, TICK, TICK TICK, TICK...
ReVulse
> Dr Walpurgis <burke.d...@cunting.hun> wrote:
>> On 2009-11-20 19:10:03 +0000, ANuS said:
>
> [..]
>
>> >>> I'm just going to keep pounding on you until you go away. I don't
>> >>> know how much longer this campaign is going to go on, but I
>> >>> guarantee that I'll enjoy it much more than you will.
>> >>
>> >> ANuS FAIL: MONTH 17
>> >
>> > Not once did I ever say that I was going to eject you by a certain
>> > time, or date.
>
>> For the GLARINGLY OBVIOUS reason that you are QUITE INCAPABLE of it.
>
> Another of your dishonest debating tactics: state something with no
> basis
> in fact, then act like it's just sooooooooooooooooooo obvious. As if
> mere conviction and lung power were enough. (Maybe for you and your
> pals, but not for the folks who built Usenet, and for *whom* it was
> built. Not for folks who actually have more than three neurons to rub
> together.)
> You, of course, don't want to remember the evidence to the contrary I
> already posted, but that's all the more reason to remind you:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/qdbvv
LOL! LOL! - 1996! WHAT HAVE YOU DONE LATELY?
> Haushalter was a research scientist for NEC in New Jersey, and a
> years-long
> veteran of alt.flame. He was a much smarter and much tougher man than
> you, yet I broke *him*. Therefore, I will inevitably break you. That's
> just simple deductive logic.
> And just to put the icing on the cake, here's my elaboration on the
> idea...
> which you couldn't rebut in any way, so you only followed up with "A
> BITTER MAN", as if that actually proved or even said anything:
Says someone who responds with "FAQ" numbers.
Face it you twat, you're beaten at every turn.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/yhac4am
>
> Haushalter knew that everyone would yell "spank" after he vanished.
> That
> didn't matter. It just wasn't a voluntary action on his part.
>
> I also already said that spanking is an inexact science, and that I
> couldn't
> say, exactly, when you would, ah, depart totally of your own volition
> (that's what you'll tell everybody, and maintain to your grave, anyway).
> Hell, Bill Palmer and James Koput, also formerly of alt.flame, were even
> more pathetic than you, yet they stuck around, despite getting
> bodyslammed by everyone, for years. I think that was largely because
> they had nothing to which to be spanked, IYKWIM,AITYD. (<--- Large hint
> here.)
> So by all means keep wittering on and on about clocks, even though all
> that
> is sensationally irrelevant. You know how you keep deleting very large
> sections of my posts that you don't want to answer? Here, I'll just
> leave in the rest of yours, in its full unedited glory, just so everyone
> can gawk at your confused, garbled thought process, and your wit that
> couldn't cut hot butter:
You pointless cunt. You haven't forced a single one of us out of the
group (and never will).
So when are you going to start?
>
>> But the sight of the ANuS FAIL ODOMETER, ticking round inexorably, is a
>> SATISFYING one for alt.horror to observe. Every month your "designated
>> targets" ("*snigger*") are still CHEERFULLY PRESENT AND CORRECT, is
>> ANOTHER month in which WE WON and YOU LOST.
>
>> Face it, Jacky son. The whole business is a TEXT BOOK EXAMPLE of why
>> you're a RANK AMATEUR. You made ONE HELL of a STRATEGIC BLUNDER. And I
>> intend to continue to RUB YOUR SNOUT in it.
>
>> TICK, TICK, TICK, TICK, TICK . . .
>
>> --
>> "I am as predictable as the sunrise" - Avoid normal situations, 12/7/09
>
> There. Wasn't that fun?
>
> Now respond with, "A BITTER MAN," and only that. Go ahead, I dare you.
But you are A BITTER MAN. You've failed to remove the designated targets.
You've been made to look a total retard time and time again. Just give it
a rest. If you want to wave the white flag, we won't blame you.
Avoid normal situations.
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:40:16 +0000, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
[..]
> > [ one of the subjects that ReVulse is avoiding, deleted }
> What subject am I avoiding?
<MUSIC-TAG RECORDING_ARTIST=Frank Zappa;TITLE=I'm The Slime>
> I note you used a square bracket at the beginning and a brace at the end.
> I assume this was intentional?
Incorrect. (Oops.)
> >> >> Did you even read what she said to me in the link you posted?
> >> >
> >> > No. Only what you quoted.
> >
> >> "Do you actually read any articles on this group"
> >
> > Snobbery is underrated. Snobs set the standards for excellence in
> > everything ((tm) Andy Rooney).
> An attempt to ignore the fact that you have once again been hoisted by
> your own petard.
You say that like ignoring The White Lady is something of which to be
ashamed.
> >> > Similarly, you and your pals are very, very bitter about getting
> >> > your asses
> >> > kicked in major flamewars by yours truly
> >
> >> Really? You're the one backpedalling.
> >
> > What backpedal? It's your responsibility to post evidence that TWL was
> > being sarcastic, which you have failed to do.
> Why do you always require proof of the bleeding obvious?
I don't. I won't listen to this crap of yours without supporting evidence,
however.
> >> > and you're no doubt even more
> >> > bitter about your failure to get the entire newsgroup to ignore me
> >> > away; that was proof positive that, no, you don't control the entire
> >> > group after all.
> >
> >> You're the one who claims there is a controlling clique, remember?
> >
> > Straw man. I claim that there's a clique who *think* they control the
> > group.
> Straw man. The clique is your invention regardless of its activity or
> intentions.
You can deny it until your face turns blue, but, as documented in the FAQ,
you guys sure keep *acting* like you're a junior high school "in crowd". You
know what speaks louder than words.
> >> > So you spend enormous amounts of time spewing garbage with
> >> > ridiculously weak, if any, factual basis ("STALKER", "RAIN MAN",
> >> > etc., etc., etc.) and making mountains out of molehills ("Oh, look,
> >> > he misused a word!", etc.) like this one.
> >
> >> And you never pick up on spelling or punctuation errors, do you?
> >
> > After all the "RAIN MAN" bullshit, pointing out how much better my
> > command
> > of the language is than yours is just irresistible.
> Hypocrite. You can't have one rule for you and another rule for everyone
> else. If you pick up on people's errors, then it's only fair that your
> errors should be highlighted also.
There you go with the straw men again. I never said it was wrong to point
out my errors. They'll continue to be less numerous and much less severe than
the errors on your side of this conflict, however. Furthermore, your
continuous screaming, "THIS IS EVEN MORE LAME THAN USUAL THAN YOU, THIS IS
EVEN MORE LAME THAN USUAL THAN YOU, THIS IS EVEN MORE LAME THAN YOU" when I
have made such a solid case for your ejection from the newsgroup just shows
up how outgunned you are.
Hell, your entire Usenet posting history is an error.
> > It took me years, but I finally figured it out
> That seems to be your usual timescale.
Mike, Crow, and Tom Servo: Wah, wah, wah, wah, waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!
> > I don't know what the real lives of people like you, Bod, Walpurgis,
> > et al.,
> > are, but I do know one thing: if any of you had any real status in life,
> > or if your situations were even remotely desirable, you wouldn't need to
> > play these sorts of games on newsgroups
> LOL!
< cue Richard Schultz >
> Do you ever read what you write?
All the time. Your point?
> > ... just like it never occurred
> > to me that grown men and women would pull this sort of shit until Robert
> > Lee
> Stalker!
FAQ #4.
> <irrelevant drivel snipped>
Translation: "I ran out of ideas."
Avoid normal situations.
> On 2009-11-21 13:14:36 +0000, ReVulse
> <ReV...@psychaoticREMOVETHIS.fsnet.co.uk> said:
> >> [ one of the subjects that ReVulse is avoiding, deleted }
> >
> > I note you used a square bracket at the beginning and a brace at the end.
> What a SPACKER. Too busy FOAMING AT THE MOUTH to TYPE RIGHT. Perhaps
> his HEAD STICK needs replacing?
QED.
Does anybody sense some frantic desperation? ((tm) Jello Biafra, 1991)
Avoid normal situations.
Dr Walpurgis
<ReV...@psychaoticREMOVETHIS.fsnet.co.uk> said:
>>>>> ANuS FAIL: MONTH 17
>>>>
>>>> Not once did I ever say that I was going to eject you by a certain
>>>> time, or date.
>>>
>>> For the GLARINGLY OBVIOUS reason that you are QUITE INCAPABLE of it.
>>> But the sight of the ANuS FAIL ODOMETER, ticking round inexorably, is a
>>> SATISFYING one for alt.horror to observe. Every month your "designated
>>> targets" ("*snigger*") are still CHEERFULLY PRESENT AND CORRECT, is
>>> ANOTHER month in which WE WON and YOU LOST.
>>> Face it, Jacky son. The whole business is a TEXT BOOK EXAMPLE of why
>>> you're a RANK AMATEUR. You made ONE HELL of a STRATEGIC BLUNDER. And I
>>> intend to continue to RUB YOUR SNOUT in it.
>>> TICK, TICK, TICK, TICK, TICK . . .
>>
>> Now respond with, "A BITTER MAN," and only that. Go ahead, I dare you.
>
> But you are A BITTER MAN. You've failed to remove the designated targets.
> You've been made to look a total retard time and time again. Just give it
> a rest. If you want to wave the white flag, we won't blame you.
No, he's being DRIVEN to SUICIDE. It's the only way he'll be able deal
with TOTAL HUMILIATION on this scale. The alternative is a LIFE
BLIGHTED by the GNAWING KNOWLEGDE that we'll still be RICHARD
SCHULTZING at his hard won RESIDENT LOONY status YEARS from now, and he
BROUGHT IT ALL on his SAD LITTLE SELF. The fact is, he simply doesn't
have Lifshine's stamina. So he's bound to be FELLATING a CHEAP HANDGUN
sooner or later.
TICK, TICK, TICK, TICK, TICK . . .
--
"I have banished Bod from alt.horror." - Avoid normal situations, 22/7/09
Lesmond
> If you want to wave the white flag, we won't blame you.
Indeed, it's the only way for him to garner any last shred of respect.
--
If there's a nuclear winter, at least it'll snow.
Dr Walpurgis
>> If you want to wave the white flag, we won't blame you.
>
> Indeed, it's the only way for him to garner any last shred of respect.
And wave it HE WILL.
Of course, not once did we ever say that he was going to wave it BY A
CERTAIN TIME OR DATE ("*snigger*"). But that WHITE FLAG'll be
A-FLUTTERIN' over the CASA DEL RAIN MAN sooner or later. You can hear
him SPITTING ON HIS SPASTIC HANDS, ready to HOIST IT, in every post he
makes.
A BEATEN MAN.
Avoid normal situations.
> On 2009-11-21 22:45:47 +0000, ANuS said:
[..]
> > There. Wasn't that fun?
> >
> > Now respond with, "A BITTER MAN,"...
> "RAIN MAN", LOL.
FAQ #6.
> > ...and only that. Go ahead, I dare you.
> TICK, TICK, TICK TICK, TICK...
Well, not *quite* as impotent as predicted.
--
alt.flame Special Forces
Dr Walpurgis
>>> There. Wasn't that fun?
>>> Now respond with, "A BITTER MAN,"...
>>
>> "RAIN MAN", LOL.
>
> FAQ #6.
http://www.tinyurl.com/anusfaq6
> ...and only that. Go ahead, I dare you.
>
>> TICK, TICK, TICK TICK, TICK...
>
> Well, not *quite* as impotent as predicted.
Aye, that's another HAND SPIT.
HOIST THAT FLAG, Jacky son, HOIST IT HIGH.
bod
"Dr Walpurgis" <burke.d...@cunting.hun> wrote in message
> On 2009-11-21 13:14:36 +0000, ReVulse
> <ReV...@psychaoticREMOVETHIS.fsnet.co.uk> said:
>
>>> [ one of the subjects that ReVulse is avoiding, deleted }
>>
>> I note you used a square bracket at the beginning and a brace at the end.
>
> What a SPACKER. Too busy FOAMING AT THE MOUTH to TYPE RIGHT. Perhaps his
> HEAD STICK needs replacing?
>
> http://tinyurl.com/anustyping
oh look NO REPLY....hes run away for a fourtnight again to cry in a wardrobe
and treat his MOTHER LIKE SHIT in an attempt to VENT HIS FRUSTRATION.
Avoid normal situations.
> On 2009-11-22 18:17:17 +0000, ANuS said:
> >>> There. Wasn't that fun?
> >>> Now respond with, "A BITTER MAN,"...
> >>
> >> "RAIN MAN", LOL.
> >
> > FAQ #6.
> http://www.tinyurl.com/anusfaq6
Funny pictures...
> > ...and only that. Go ahead, I dare you.
> >
> >> TICK, TICK, TICK TICK, TICK...
> >
> > Well, not *quite* as impotent as predicted.
> Aye, that's another HAND SPIT.
> HOIST THAT FLAG, Jacky son, HOIST IT HIGH.
...and incoherence.
--
alt.flame Special Forces
"Of all the treasures a State can possess, the human lives of its citizens are
for us the most precious." -- Joseph Stalin
bod
"bod" <glass...@ble.com> wrote in message
news:7n0dt0F...@mid.individual.net...
>
> "Dr Walpurgis" <burke.d...@cunting.hun> wrote in message
> news:he9eap$mqb$1...@drwalpurgis.motzarella.org...
>> On 2009-11-21 13:14:36 +0000, ReVulse
>> <ReV...@psychaoticREMOVETHIS.fsnet.co.uk> said:
>>
>>>> [ one of the subjects that ReVulse is avoiding, deleted }
>>>
>>> I note you used a square bracket at the beginning and a brace at the
>>> end.
>>
>> What a SPACKER. Too busy FOAMING AT THE MOUTH to TYPE RIGHT. Perhaps his
>> HEAD STICK needs replacing?
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/anustyping
>
> oh look NO REPLY....hes run away for a fourtnight again to cry in a
> wardrobe and treat his MOTHER LIKE SHIT in an attempt to VENT HIS
> FRUSTRATION.
>
>
still nothing....id say that classes as a SPANK if i ever saw one....who
fancies laying CLAIM TO IT?
Avoid normal situations.
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:45:47 +0000, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
> > Dr Walpurgis <burke.d...@cunting.hun> wrote:
> >> On 2009-11-20 19:10:03 +0000, ANuS said:
[..]
> >> > time, or date.
> >
> >> For the GLARINGLY OBVIOUS reason that you are QUITE INCAPABLE of it.
> >
> > Another of your dishonest debating tactics: state something with no
> > basis
> > in fact, then act like it's just sooooooooooooooooooo obvious. As if
> > mere conviction and lung power were enough. (Maybe for you and your
> > pals, but not for the folks who built Usenet, and for *whom* it was
> > built. Not for folks who actually have more than three neurons to rub
> > together.)
> > You, of course, don't want to remember the evidence to the contrary I
> > already posted, but that's all the more reason to remind you:
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/qdbvv
> LOL! LOL!
< cue Richard Schultz > < cue Richard Schultz >
> - 1996! WHAT HAVE YOU DONE LATELY?
Kick your ass from one end of this newsgroup to the other. Next question?
> > Haushalter was a research scientist for NEC in New Jersey, and a
> > years-long
> > veteran of alt.flame. He was a much smarter and much tougher man than
> > you, yet I broke *him*. Therefore, I will inevitably break you. That's
> > just simple deductive logic.
> > And just to put the icing on the cake, here's my elaboration on the
> > idea...
> > which you couldn't rebut in any way, so you only followed up with "A
> > BITTER MAN", as if that actually proved or even said anything:
> Says someone who responds with "FAQ" numbers.
Of course. They're concise and to the point. You OTOH keep trying to
restart arguments that you already lost years ago.
> Face it you twat, you're beaten at every turn.
Next reply cycle, try saying something with some basis in fact.
> You pointless cunt. You haven't forced a single one of us out of the
> group
Yet. I've already spanked Lesmond twice, and Bod is hiding behind his
killfile even though he knows damn well he's expected to do his bit to force
out of this group anybody of whom his pals don't approve.
> (and never will).
> So when are you going to start?
Once more, slowly: flaming... is... an... inexact... science...
> >> But the sight of the ANuS FAIL ODOMETER, ticking round inexorably, is a
> >> SATISFYING one for alt.horror to observe. Every month your "designated
> >> targets" ("*snigger*") are still CHEERFULLY PRESENT AND CORRECT, is
> >> ANOTHER month in which WE WON and YOU LOST.
> >
> >> Face it, Jacky son. The whole business is a TEXT BOOK EXAMPLE of why
> >> you're a RANK AMATEUR. You made ONE HELL of a STRATEGIC BLUNDER. And I
> >> intend to continue to RUB YOUR SNOUT in it.
> >
> >> TICK, TICK, TICK, TICK, TICK . . .
> >
> >> --
> >> "I am as predictable as the sunrise" - Avoid normal situations, 12/7/09
> >
> > There. Wasn't that fun?
> >
> > Now respond with, "A BITTER MAN," and only that. Go ahead, I dare you.
> But you are A BITTER MAN.
Why?
> You've failed to remove the designated targets.
I've not failed. The process is ongoing. Only when it's over can "success"
or "failure" be judged.
This flamewar can only end one way: the permanent disappearance of you and
the other designated targets from this newsgroup. You won't enjoy this
process very much, but I will.
> You've been made to look a total retard time and time again.
Wrong. You have made mountains out of molehills so as to try to distract
the readership of this group from the real issues. No one is fooled except
the people who want to be so fooled, and their opinions don't matter anyway.
> Just give it
> a rest. If you want to wave the white flag, we won't blame you.
Time and again, you reveal that you and your pals are the ones who are
anxious for this conflict to be over. QED.
ReVulse
> ReVulse <ReV...@psychaoticremovethis.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>> - 1996! WHAT HAVE YOU DONE LATELY?
>
> Kick your ass from one end of this newsgroup to the other.
Please provide proof.
>> You pointless cunt. You haven't forced a single one of us out of the
>> group
>
> Yet. I've already spanked Lesmond twice
Please provide proof.
>> So when are you going to start?
>
> Once more, slowly: flaming... is... an... inexact... science...
So inexact that you can't actually tell when it starts or if it's even
underway?
Dr Walpurgis
<ReV...@psychaoticREMOVETHIS.fsnet.co.uk> said:
>>> - 1996! WHAT HAVE YOU DONE LATELY?
>>
>> Kick your ass from one end of this newsgroup to the other.
>
> Please provide proof.
>
>>> You pointless cunt. You haven't forced a single one of us out of the
>>> group
>>
>> Yet. I've already spanked Lesmond twice
>
> Please provide proof.
>
>>> So when are you going to start?
>>
>> Once more, slowly: flaming... is... an... inexact... science...
>
> So inexact that you can't actually tell when it starts or if it's even
> underway?
. . . and CHECKMATE.
--
"I don't know how much longer this campaign is going to go on." - Avoid
normal situations, 20/11/09
Dr Walpurgis
>>> Now respond with, "A BITTER MAN," and only that. Go ahead, I dare you.
>>
>> But you are A BITTER MAN.
>
> Why?
>
>> You've failed to remove the designated targets.
>
> I've not failed. The process is ongoing. Only when it's over can "success"
> or "failure" be judged.
>
> This flamewar can only end one way: the permanent disappearance of you and
> the other designated targets from this newsgroup. You won't enjoy this
> process very much, but I will.
>
>> You've been made to look a total retard time and time again.
>
> Wrong. You have made mountains out of molehills so as to try to distract
> the readership of this group from the real issues. No one is fooled except
> the people who want to be so fooled, and their opinions don't matter anyway.
>
>> Just give it
>> a rest. If you want to wave the white flag, we won't blame you.
>
> Time and again, you reveal that you and your pals are the ones who are
> anxious for this conflict to be over. QED.
<MUSIC-TAG RECORDING_ARTIST=Joe Dolce;TITLE=Shaddap Your Face>
# WHASSAMATTA YOU? (hey!)
Gotta no respect?
Whaddaya think you do?
WHY
YOU LOOKA SO SAD?
It's-a not so bad
It's-a nice-a place
Ah, SHADDAPPA
YOUR FACE #
--
"I'm clearly mentally unsound" - Avoid normal situations, 22/8/09
Avoid normal situations.
[..]
> No, he's being DRIVEN to SUICIDE. It's the only way he'll be able deal
> with TOTAL HUMILIATION on this scale. The alternative is a LIFE
> BLIGHTED by the GNAWING KNOWLEGDE that we'll still be RICHARD
> SCHULTZING at his hard won RESIDENT LOONY status YEARS from now, and he
> BROUGHT IT ALL on his SAD LITTLE SELF. The fact is, he simply doesn't
> have Lifshine's stamina. So he's bound to be FELLATING a CHEAP HANDGUN
> sooner or later.
You've been trying to drive me off this newsgroup for six years, ever since
I badly embarrassed you by telling everybody what you were doing to Robert
Lee. Despite your constant mantra-like declarations of "ANS CAN'T FLAME FOR
SHIT" and the like, and despite that you've made sure you have plenty of
backup on your side at all times -- in fact, you've always had me heavily
outnumbered, except for a certain period at the end of 2007 when certain
persons stupidly crossposted to alt.flame -- you have failed. In fact, you've
even been too chickenshit to come out and say that's what you've been doing,
while I have been completely forthright about my intentions from the start.
If anything, I post here a lot *more* often than I did in 2003.
As such, you and your crew are in no position to tease anyone about
(allegedly) failed eviction campaigns. Glass houses, and all that.
> TICK, TICK, TICK, TICK, TICK . . .
Indeed.
Dr Walpurgis
>> No, he's being DRIVEN to SUICIDE. It's the only way he'll be able deal
>> with TOTAL HUMILIATION on this scale. The alternative is a LIFE
>> BLIGHTED by the GNAWING KNOWLEGDE that we'll still be RICHARD
>> SCHULTZING at his hard won RESIDENT LOONY status YEARS from now, and he
>> BROUGHT IT ALL on his SAD LITTLE SELF. The fact is, he simply doesn't
>> have Lifshine's stamina. So he's bound to be FELLATING a CHEAP HANDGUN
>> sooner or later.
>
> You've been trying to drive me off this newsgroup for six years, ever since
> I badly embarrassed you by telling everybody what you were doing to Robert
> Lee. Despite your constant mantra-like declarations of "ANS CAN'T FLAME FOR
> SHIT" and the like, and despite that you've made sure you have plenty of
> backup on your side at all times -- in fact, you've always had me heavily
> outnumbered, except for a certain period at the end of 2007 when certain
> persons stupidly crossposted to alt.flame -- you have failed. In fact, you've
> even been too chickenshit to come out and say that's what you've been doing,
> while I have been completely forthright about my intentions from the start.
> If anything, I post here a lot *more* often than I did in 2003.
> As such, you and your crew are in no position to tease anyone about
> (allegedly) failed eviction campaigns. Glass houses, and all that.
Remember to STICK IT IN YOUR MOUTH and POINT UP, Jacky son. You don't
want to FAIL at that too.
Avoid normal situations.
> On 22 Nov 2009 01:34:20 GMT, ReVulse wrote:
> > If you want to wave the white flag, we won't blame you.
> Indeed, it's the only way for him to garner any last shred of respect.
Oh my god. That's the first thing you've ever posted that actually made me
laugh out loud.
Once you see through them, you can't pretend you're a part of them ((tm) Jim
Goad).
--
alt.flame "leastways I'm not inclined" Special Forces
Avoid normal situations.
Dr Walpurgis <burke.d...@cunting.hun> wrote:
> On 2009-11-22 17:45:25 +0000, "Lesmond" <les...@verizon.net> said:
[ ReVulse's attrib line cut, for some mysterious reason ]
> >> If you want to wave the white flag, we won't blame you.
> >
> > Indeed, it's the only way for him to garner any last shred of respect.
> And wave it HE WILL.
> Of course, not once did we ever say that he was going to wave it BY A
> CERTAIN TIME OR DATE ("*snigger*"). But that WHITE FLAG'll be
> A-FLUTTERIN' over the CASA DEL RAIN MAN sooner or later. You can hear
> him SPITTING ON HIS SPASTIC HANDS, ready to HOIST IT, in every post he
> makes.
> A BEATEN MAN.
"Anyone who hides within the crowd is a coward. Anyone. It's the only
place where the weak can feel strong. Strength in numbers for those
weak as individuals. Safe within the crowd, a safe place for the faceless.
Can't see the forest for the trees. Just a cell in the body. Just a dim
little star in the galaxy. A locust amid the swarm. A goose in the gaggle.
"Replaceable.
"Little minds hide in big crowds. Little specks of toner on a giant
Xeroxed sheet. Drowning in their own irrelevance. Striving to be
unexceptional. Celebrating their blandness. Lusting after the ordinary.
The common. The run-of-the-mill. The middle-of-the-road. The mundane.
"Breeding for quantity, the lowest common denominator factored
exponentially, mere sequels of their parents, they really think they're so
special that they need to reproduce themselves, thinking one of them
isn't plenty, or too much already, existing for no other apparent purpose
than to squirt out more like them, spraying their intellectually
stunted, emotionally arrested genes like pollen, one smelly asshole
leading to another, breeding another and another, a big knot of
swelling flesh clogging nature's toilet.
"I'll bet each little individual fungal spore which clings to my bathtub
thinks it's special, too.
"I've taken shits which are more intelligent than these people. Ask
them why they exist, and they just stare at you confused."
-- Jim Goad
--
alt.flame Special Forces
Dr Walpurgis
>>> If you want to wave the white flag, we won't blame you.
>>
>> Indeed, it's the only way for him to garner any last shred of respect.
>
> Oh my god. That's the first thing you've ever posted that actually made me
> laugh out loud.
< cue Richard Schultz >
Dr Walpurgis
> <MUSIC-TAG RECORDING_ARTIST=Metallica;TITLE=Escape>
<MUSIC-TAG RECORDING_ARTIST=Neal Hefti;TITLE=Batman>
Commissioner Gordon: "Penguin, Joker, Riddler... and Catwoman, too. The
sum of the angles of that rectangle is too monstrous to contemplate."
Batman: "We've been given the plainest warning. They're working
together to take over..."
Chief O'Hara: "Take over *what*, Batman? Gotham City?"
Batman: "Any *two* of them would try that."
Commissioner Gordon: "The whole country?"
Batman: "If it were three of them, I would say yes, but *four*? Their
minimum objective must be... the *entire* world!"
http://www.tinyurl.com/anusfaq7
ReVulse
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:10:44 +0000, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
> "Anyone who hides within the crowd is a coward. Anyone. It's the only
> place where the weak can feel strong. Strength in numbers for those weak
> as individuals."<snip>
If this an attempt to claim that you're outnumbered, just remember it was
you who selected multiple "designated targets". If you can't handle it,
I'm sure we could come to some sort of agreement that only one
"designated target" will humiliate you at any one time.
Dr Walpurgis
<ReV...@psychaoticREMOVETHIS.fsnet.co.uk> said:
> <MUSIC-TAG RECORDING_ARTIST=The Queers;TITLE=I'm OK, You're Fucked>
>
>> "Anyone who hides within the crowd is a coward. Anyone. It's the only
>> place where the weak can feel strong. Strength in numbers for those weak
>> as individuals."<snip>
>
> If this an attempt to claim that you're outnumbered, just remember it was
> you who selected multiple "designated targets". If you can't handle it,
> I'm sure we could come to some sort of agreement that only one
> "designated target" will humiliate you at any one time.
He's not "outnumbered". He has dozens supporting him in email, ARF ARF.
Avoid normal situations.
If you're going to fail to address any point that I have made, at least
get your own material.
Dr Walpurgis
TICK, TICK, TICK, TICK, TICK . . .
--
Lesmond
Beautiful!
Avoid normal situations.
Indeed.
To be more precise... six years, one month, and counting.
--
alt.flame "that 'but you've offered no proof of intent' defense is so stupid
that not even you or any of your pals have dared to repeat it lately" Special
ReVulse
> Dr Walpurgis <burke.d...@cunting.hun> wrote:
>> TICK, TICK, TICK, TICK, TICK . . .
>
> Indeed.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/ddhzvy
>
> To be more precise... six years, one month, and counting.
What the fuck are you going on about now?
Avoid normal situations.
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:14:04 +0000, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
> > Dr Walpurgis <burke.d...@cunting.hun> wrote:
> >> TICK, TICK, TICK, TICK, TICK . . .
> >
> > Indeed.
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/ddhzvy
> >
> > To be more precise... six years, one month, and counting.
> What the fuck are you going on about now?
You jumped into the middle of a flamewar about which you had no clue...
because all your friends were doing it. Now, over two years later, you
STILL have no idea what it's really about.
--
alt.flame Special Forces
Lesmond
>ReVulse <ReV...@psychaoticremovethis.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:14:04 +0000, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
>
>> > Dr Walpurgis <burke.d...@cunting.hun> wrote:
>
>> >> TICK, TICK, TICK, TICK, TICK . . .
>> >
>> > Indeed.
>> >
>> > http://tinyurl.com/ddhzvy
>> >
>> > To be more precise... six years, one month, and counting.
>
>> What the fuck are you going on about now?
>
> You jumped into the middle of a flamewar about which you had no clue...
>because all your friends were doing it. Now, over two years later, you
>STILL have no idea what it's really about.
And neither do the rest of us. You're on a mission by yourself. No one else
takes this seriously. Well, I guess Andy does.
ReVulse
> ReVulse <ReV...@psychaoticremovethis.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:14:04 +0000, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
>
>> > Dr Walpurgis <burke.d...@cunting.hun> wrote:
>
>> >> TICK, TICK, TICK, TICK, TICK . . .
>> >
>> > Indeed.
>> >
>> > http://tinyurl.com/ddhzvy
>> >
>> > To be more precise... six years, one month, and counting.
>
>> What the fuck are you going on about now?
>
> You jumped into the middle of a flamewar about which you had no
> clue...
> because all your friends were doing it. Now, over two years later, you
> STILL have no idea what it's really about.
You're the one who STILL has no idea. I didn't get involved in a flamewar
with you for any reasons other than my own.
ReVulse
Not really, it's just entertainment to me. It's fun to kick idiots around
the group. I know not everyone finds it as entertaining; my long running
dispute with Varizo drove most people here up the wall and I'm sure these
exchanges with ANS are having the same effect.
Avoid normal situations.
> On 29 Nov 2009 04:06:46 GMT, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
> >ReVulse <ReV...@psychaoticremovethis.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
[..]
> > You jumped into the middle of a flamewar about which you had no clue...
> >because all your friends were doing it. Now, over two years later, you
> >STILL have no idea what it's really about.
> And neither do the rest of us.
Yes, you do.
> You're on a mission by yourself.
By design, as detailed in the FAQ.
> No one else
> takes this seriously. Well, I guess Andy does.
This is all DEADLY serious for you.
"The Gore-met" became pissed at Robert Lee for perceived racism. Gore set
Lee up to get Swen-spammed as much as humanly possible. Lee figured out what
was going on, and called him on it in public. This was a Pecking Order
Violation, so Lee proceeded to get ratpacked by an assortment of Gore's little
buddies even though it was obvious Gore was guilty, and he never even tried to
defend himself.
You were there at the time. You could have stuck up for Lee, but you're
lonely, and you're scared, so you didn't dare. You never stood up to the mob,
and you never will.
I OTOH *did* stick up for him, and also exposed what the in-crowders were
doing. This was a big laugh for one and all -- on the alt.flame side of the
fence, anyway.
That is why this thread is going on, and will continue until I remove you.
"Dr. Walpurgis" will hate me for the rest of his life for that, and I bet you
and ReVulse will as well. I showed backbone, which reminds you all of your
cowardice. I think for myself, and well, which reminds you all of what a bunch
of zombies you are. It really is that simple. That is why you all keep
screaming "STALKER" and (especially) "RAIN MAN" at me, and pray that it will
stick.
And if you think things are bad *now*, wait 'til your kid becomes a teenager
and starts treating you like an ATM.
--
alt.flame Special Forces
"All wars are popular for the first 30 days." -- Arthur Schlesinger Jr.
Lesmond
>Lesmond <les...@verizon.net> wrote:
>> On 29 Nov 2009 04:06:46 GMT, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
>> >ReVulse <ReV...@psychaoticremovethis.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>
> [..]
>
>> > You jumped into the middle of a flamewar about which you had no clue...
>> >because all your friends were doing it. Now, over two years later, you
>> >STILL have no idea what it's really about.
>
>> And neither do the rest of us.
>
> Yes, you do.
>
>> You're on a mission by yourself.
>
> By design, as detailed in the FAQ.
>
>> No one else
>> takes this seriously. Well, I guess Andy does.
>
> This is all DEADLY serious for you.
How so?
>
> "The Gore-met" became pissed at Robert Lee for perceived racism.
This all happened, what? A dozen years ago?
Gore set
>Lee up to get Swen-spammed as much as humanly possible.
Everyone blamed that on Ringo, remember? And who was the only one to stand
up for him? It wasn't you.
Lee figured out what
>was going on, and called him on it in public. This was a Pecking Order
>Violation, so Lee proceeded to get ratpacked by an assortment of Gore's little
>buddies even though it was obvious Gore was guilty, and he never even tried to
>defend himself.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4x--HkmQAA
> You were there at the time. You could have stuck up for Lee, but you're
>lonely, and you're scared, so you didn't dare. You never stood up to the mob,
>and you never will.
I did stick up for him and he eventually came back to the group because I
asked him. We had a long and healthy email correspondence, too. You?
> I OTOH *did* stick up for him, and also exposed what the in-crowders were
>doing. This was a big laugh for one and all -- on the alt.flame side of the
>fence, anyway.
Your life is chess and alt.flame. No friends, no family. Oooh...my labia
are moistening as we speak.
Ringo...come home!
ReVulse
> This was a Pecking
> Order Violation
Not only do you invent a clique, but now it seems you have a complete
alt.horror organisational chart worked out.
Could you post a copy here, so we can all see where we stand?
I'm guessing you're at the bottom.
Dr Walpurgis
<ReV...@psychaoticREMOVETHIS.fsnet.co.uk> said:
>> This was a Pecking Order Violation
>
> Not only do you invent a clique, but now it seems you have a complete
> alt.horror organisational chart worked out.
> Could you post a copy here, so we can all see where we stand?
> I'm guessing you're at the bottom.
Of course. It's only the EMBITTERED PROLETARIAT that DREAM of REVOLUTION.
LET HIM EAT CAKE.
--
"I saw a clinical psychologist once." - Avoid normal situations, 18/2/09
Jared
wrote:
> ...my long running
> dispute with Varizo drove most people here up the wall and I'm sure these
At least Varizo was BEAUTIFUL.
Lesmond
>On Nov 30, 2:22ÿam, ReVulse <ReVu...@psychaoticREMOVETHIS.fsnet.co.uk>
Or so he said. I always coveted his hair from his descriptions.
bod
"Lesmond" <les...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:yrfzbaqirevmbaarg.ktvrhc0.pminews@blue...
> On 29 Nov 2009 15:22:02 GMT, ReVulse wrote:
> According to his rules, if you reply to him, he wins. If you don't reply,
> he
> wins. It's your call.
>
your forgetting the THRASHING i dispensed to him...he was beaten like a
ginger stepchild and humiliated to such a degree he isnt even worthy of
attention anymore....and i denied him of his so called spank......NOW thats
how you WASTE THE INVALID.
--
regards from BOD!
"dont worry yoko, its only a friggin water pist...."
JOHN LENNON 1980
http://www.myspace.com/bodland
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=bodland
Avoid normal situations.
> On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:18:06 -0500, Lesmond wrote:
[..]
> Not really, it's just entertainment to me. It's fun to kick idiots around
> the group.
Lying makes baby Jesus cry, Andy.
No idiot would ever be able to roast your ass well enough to get your goat
sufficiently to incite you to post an "I'm going to get you, Flintstone!"
physical threat to the group.
You wouldn't have subsequently tried to get everyone to ignore me off the
group, either... if this was "just entertainment".
ReVulse
> ReVulse <ReV...@psychaoticremovethis.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>> On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:18:06 -0500, Lesmond wrote:
>
> [..]
>
>> Not really, it's just entertainment to me. It's fun to kick idiots
>> around the group.
>
> Lying makes baby Jesus cry, Andy.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/8urnqe
>
> No idiot would ever be able to roast your ass well enough to get your
> goat
> sufficiently to incite you to post an "I'm going to get you,
> Flintstone!" physical threat to the group.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/7chfmn
>
> You wouldn't have subsequently tried to get everyone to ignore me off
> the
> group, either... if this was "just entertainment".
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEA5mBPb6OM
Avoid normal situations.
> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:56:23 +0000, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
> > ReVulse <ReV...@psychaoticremovethis.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:18:06 -0500, Lesmond wrote:
[..]
> >> Not really, it's just entertainment to me. It's fun to kick idiots
> >> around the group.
> >
> > Lying makes baby Jesus cry, Andy.
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/8urnqe
> >
> > No idiot would ever be able to roast your ass well enough to get your
> > goat
> > sufficiently to incite you to post an "I'm going to get you,
> > Flintstone!" physical threat to the group.
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/7chfmn
> >
> > You wouldn't have subsequently tried to get everyone to ignore me off
> > the
> > group, either... if this was "just entertainment".
> ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEA5mBPb6OM
Very cute. But can you manage an actual argument?
Avoid normal situations.
> On 29 Nov 2009 17:33:48 GMT, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
> >Lesmond <les...@verizon.net> wrote:
> >> On 29 Nov 2009 04:06:46 GMT, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
> >> >ReVulse <ReV...@psychaoticremovethis.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
[..]
> >> > You jumped into the middle of a flamewar about which you had no clue...
> >> >because all your friends were doing it. Now, over two years later, you
> >> >STILL have no idea what it's really about.
> >
> >> And neither do the rest of us.
> >
> > Yes, you do.
> >
> >> You're on a mission by yourself.
> >
> > By design, as detailed in the FAQ.
> >
> >> No one else
> >> takes this seriously. Well, I guess Andy does.
> >
> > This is all DEADLY serious for you.
> How so?
If it were really facetious, it would never have gone on this long, or in
this much earnest. You also wouldn't have been telling newbies, "There's no
need to respond to this guy," remember?
> > "The Gore-met" became pissed at Robert Lee for perceived racism.
> This all happened, what? A dozen years ago?
Six years ago and some change, to be precise. But you just couldn't let it
go.
> Gore set
> >Lee up to get Swen-spammed as much as humanly possible.
> Everyone blamed that on Ringo, remember?
Crap.
> And who was the only one to stand
> for him?
Actually, there were several people who thought Walpurgis's "We are the Dark
Lords of alt.horror, and We Are Not Amused" routine was seriously ridiculous,
and at least some of them said so in public.
> It wasn't you.
I *was* one of those who did.
You seriously need to do some research before posting silly, unsupported
statements like that to Usenet. Besides, that entire thread is just hilarious.
I especially like the part...
...where WideScreenPig called a bootlicking toady, Homer, "a valuable and
well respected poster on this n.g." That one's a gutbuster.
I was never a herd animal... not even when I was a tiny child... so I often
wonder how great the difference in perceptions really is. For instance: does,
say, a pastrami sandwich taste the same to me as it does to a creature like
you? Damned if I know how that could be found out with present technology, but
it would be so fascinating.
> Lee figured out what
> >was going on, and called him on it in public. This was a Pecking Order
> >Violation, so Lee proceeded to get ratpacked by an assortment of Gore's little
> >buddies even though it was obvious Gore was guilty, and he never even tried to
> >defend himself.
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4x--HkmQAA
Easy there, lady. You're catching the Walpurgis Disease (funny pictures in
lieu of an actual argument).
I know you're terrified of growing old alone, but that would at least have
*some* dignity. Before long, you'll be just as stupid and as delusional as
Bod, et al. are.
Oh, wait.
> > You were there at the time. You could have stuck up for Lee, but you're
> >lonely, and you're scared, so you didn't dare. You never stood up to the mob,
> >and you never will.
> I did stick up for him
Proof, please.
> and he eventually came back to the group because I
> asked him. We had a long and healthy email correspondence, too. You?
How good a connection was he?
> > I OTOH *did* stick up for him, and also exposed what the in-crowders were
> >doing. This was a big laugh for one and all -- on the alt.flame side of the
> >fence, anyway.
> Your life is chess and alt.flame.
It's considerably more than that. I just don't tell *you* about it.
> No friends, no family.
Uh, yeah. And I spontaneously came into being onto this earth.
> Oooh...my labia
> are moistening as we speak.
*smirk*
Just as I will not apologize for being brilliant or erudite, I will also not
apologize for being handsome.
Besides: as they say in the legal profession... consider the source.
> Ringo...come home!
I hope he does. No artist is indifferent to the reception of his audience,
and I want to kick your asses in front of as large an audience as possible.
Avoid normal situations.
> On 29 Nov 2009 17:33:48 GMT, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
[..]
> Your life is chess and alt.flame. No friends
...so you're finally admitting that I didn't call for backup in any
flamewar... since, if I have no friends, that means I have no one to call?
As I've been saying now for years, lady... it had nothing to do with me.
They all independently came to the conclusion that you and your pals are
lameshits.
Dr Walpurgis
>> Oooh...my labia are moistening as we speak.
>
> *smirk*
< cue Richard Schultz >
Dr Walpurgis
>> Your life is chess and alt.flame. No friends
>
> ...so you're finally admitting that I didn't call for backup in any
> flamewar... since, if I have no friends, that means I have no one to call?
"HELP ME! HELP ME!! PLEEEEEEEEEEEASE HELP ME!!!"
--
"Not once did I ever say that I was going to eject you by a certain
time, or date." - Avoid normal situations, 20/11/09
ReVulse
> Lesmond <les...@verizon.net> wrote:
>> On 29 Nov 2009 17:33:48 GMT, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
>
> [..]
>
>> Your life is chess and alt.flame. No friends
>
> ...so you're finally admitting that I didn't call for backup in any
> flamewar... since, if I have no friends, that means I have no one to
> call?
>
> As I've been saying now for years, lady... it had nothing to do with
> me.
> They all independently came to the conclusion that you and your pals are
> lameshits.
That sounds familiar:
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.horror/msg/ac4490531a1d4399?hl=en
ReVulse
> Just as I will not apologize for being brilliant or erudite, I will
> also not
> apologize for being handsome.
Proof, please.
Avoid normal situations.
> On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 02:37:03 +0000, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
> > Just as I will not apologize for being brilliant or erudite, I will
> > also not
> > apologize for being handsome.
> Proof, please.
Actually, it's not possible to prove that. Even if I showed you a picture
and it turned out that I look like a Greek god, you'd still all join hands
and declare that I am muy feo in unison and repeatedly.
--
alt.flame Special Forces
"It is good morning exercise for a research scientist to discard a pet
hypothesis every day before breakfast. It keeps him young."
-- Konrad Lorenz
Avoid normal situations.
> On 2009-12-02 07:37:16 +0000, ANuS said:
> >> Your life is chess and alt.flame. No friends
> >
> > ...so you're finally admitting that I didn't call for backup in any
> > flamewar... since, if I have no friends, that means I have no one to call?
> "HELP ME! HELP ME!! PLEEEEEEEEEEEASE HELP ME!!!"
FAQ #7.
Avoid normal situations.
> On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:37:16 +0000, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
> > Lesmond <les...@verizon.net> wrote:
> >> On 29 Nov 2009 17:33:48 GMT, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
[..]
> >> Your life is chess and alt.flame. No friends
> >
> > ...so you're finally admitting that I didn't call for backup in any
> > flamewar... since, if I have no friends, that means I have no one to
> > call?
> >
> > As I've been saying now for years, lady... it had nothing to do with
> > me.
> > They all independently came to the conclusion that you and your pals are
> > lameshits.
> That sounds familiar:
> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.horror/msg/ac4490531a1d4399?hl=en
"You say you're smart and yet you can't get your head around the notion that
several people can reach the same conclusion, independently of each other."
Congratulations. You just demonstrated that I've proven you wrong yet again.
You aren't really very smart, are you?
ReVulse
> ReVulse <ReV...@psychaoticremovethis.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>> On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 02:37:03 +0000, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
>
>> > Just as I will not apologize for being brilliant or erudite, I will
>> > also not
>> > apologize for being handsome.
>
>> Proof, please.
>
> Actually, it's not possible to prove that.
If you can't prove your assertions, don't make them.
> Even if I showed you a
> picture
> and it turned out that I look like a Greek god, you'd still all join
> hands and declare that I am muy feo in unison and repeatedly.
That is a weak excuse. Handsome guys are usually only too willing to show
off their looks. Also, you are single and have been for a very long time,
which is another indicator that you're telling porkies.
Avoid normal situations.
> On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 17:33:48 +0000, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
> > This was a Pecking
> > Order Violation
> Not only do you invent a clique, but now it seems you have a complete
> alt.horror organisational chart worked out.
> Could you post a copy here, so we can all see where we stand?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
> I'm guessing you're at the bottom.
I *love* violating pecking orders. Particularly ones that don't really
exist.
ReVulse
> ReVulse <ReV...@psychaoticremovethis.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>> On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:37:16 +0000, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
>> > Lesmond <les...@verizon.net> wrote:
>> >> On 29 Nov 2009 17:33:48 GMT, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
>
> [..]
>
>> >> Your life is chess and alt.flame. No friends
>> >
>> > ...so you're finally admitting that I didn't call for backup in any
>> > flamewar... since, if I have no friends, that means I have no one to
>> > call?
>> >
>> > As I've been saying now for years, lady... it had nothing to do
>> > with me.
>> > They all independently came to the conclusion that you and your pals
>> > are lameshits.
>
>> That sounds familiar:
>
>> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.horror/msg/ac4490531a1d4399?hl=en
>
> "You say you're smart and yet you can't get your head around the
> notion that
> several people can reach the same conclusion, independently of each
> other."
>
> Congratulations. You just demonstrated that I've proven you wrong yet
> again.
AYOC? You are making less sense than Lifshine. Pull yourself together.
> You aren't really very smart, are you?
You're the one whose logic seems to have taken a leave of absence.
Avoid normal situations.
> On 2009-11-29 18:30:23 +0000, ReVulse
> <ReV...@psychaoticREMOVETHIS.fsnet.co.uk> said:
> >> This was a Pecking Order Violation
> >
> > Not only do you invent a clique, but now it seems you have a complete
> > alt.horror organisational chart worked out.
> > Could you post a copy here, so we can all see where we stand?
> > I'm guessing you're at the bottom.
> Of course. It's only the EMBITTERED PROLETARIAT that DREAM of REVOLUTION.
Thomas Jefferson was born to one of the wealthiest families in the colonies.
George Washington was a real aristocrat, too, as were many of the
revolutionaries who later became the founding fathers of the United States;
he didn't even believe in shaking hands, always opting to bow, instead, upon
greeting someone.
You're really not very smart, are you? What was that super-duper-3L33T
university you're supposed to have attended, again?
--
alt.flame "aside to audience: they just keep walking into these uppercuts"
Avoid normal situations.
> On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 04:06:46 +0000, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
> > ReVulse <ReV...@psychaoticremovethis.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
[..]
> > You jumped into the middle of a flamewar about which you had no
> > clue...
> > because all your friends were doing it. Now, over two years later, you
> > STILL have no idea what it's really about.
> I didn't get involved in a flamewar
> with you for any reasons other than my own.
That doesn't actually contradict anything I just said. Try harder, you
silly little man.
--
alt.flame Special Forces
Avoid normal situations.
> On 2009-11-26 06:10:44 +0000, ANuS said:
> > <MUSIC-TAG RECORDING_ARTIST=Metallica;TITLE=Escape>
> <MUSIC-TAG RECORDING_ARTIST=Neal Hefti;TITLE=Batman>
<MUSIC-TAG RECORDING_ARTIST=Ministry;TITLE=Nature Of Love (Cruelty Mix)>
[ snipped, 'cause this is yet another thimblewit who doesn't know how to
edit for space, although he's been on Usenet for years ]
> Commissioner Gordon: "Penguin, Joker, Riddler... and Catwoman, too. The
> sum of the angles of that rectangle is too monstrous to contemplate."
> Batman: "We've been given the plainest warning. They're working
> together to take over..."
> Chief O'Hara: "Take over *what*, Batman? Gotham City?"
> Batman: "Any *two* of them would try that."
> Commissioner Gordon: "The whole country?"
> Batman: "If it were three of them, I would say yes, but *four*? Their
> minimum objective must be... the *entire* world!"
> http://www.tinyurl.com/anusfaq7
Your point, sir?
Avoid normal situations.
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:19:13 +0000, Dr Walpurgis wrote:
[..]
> >Commissioner Gordon: "Penguin, Joker, Riddler... and Catwoman, too. The
> >sum of the angles of that rectangle is too monstrous to contemplate."
> >Batman: "We've been given the plainest warning. They're working
> >together to take over..."
> >Chief O'Hara: "Take over *what*, Batman? Gotham City?"
> >Batman: "Any *two* of them would try that."
> >Commissioner Gordon: "The whole country?"
> >Batman: "If it were three of them, I would say yes, but *four*? Their
> >minimum objective must be... the *entire* world!"
> Beautiful!
Slurp!
Dr Walpurgis
<byend.removethis...@eskimo.com> said:
>>> Just as I will not apologize for being brilliant or erudite, I will
>>> also not apologize for being handsome.
>>
>> Proof, please.
>
> Actually, it's not possible to prove that. Even if I showed you a picture
> and it turned out that I look like a Greek god, you'd still all join hands
> and declare that I am muy feo in unison and repeatedly.
Only ONE WAY to FIND OUT, son. PUT UP or SHUT UP. In the meantime, the
phrase SPINELESS POLTROON stays FIRMLY on the ANuS RESUM�.
Dr Walpurgis
>>>> Your life is chess and alt.flame. No friends
>>>
>>> ...so you're finally admitting that I didn't call for backup in any
>>> flamewar... since, if I have no friends, that means I have no one to call?
>>
>> "HELP ME! HELP ME!! PLEEEEEEEEEEEASE HELP ME!!!"
>
> FAQ #7.
http://www.tinyurl.com/anusfaq7
Avoid normal situations.
> On 29 Nov 2009 15:22:02 GMT, ReVulse wrote:
[..]
> Nah, not so much. I always thought you were a bit too mean to Varizo since
> the lad had so many obvious problems, multiple personality disorder being the
> least of it. And it seems he's probably dead now. Bad Andy.
> But, hey. If you wanna beat your head against the wall and fulfill ANuS's
> fantasies that there's a flame war going on, knock yourself out.
> According to his rules, if you reply to him, he wins. If you don't reply, he
> wins. It's your call.
Like it up there in that tree-house with the boys, do you sweetie?
ReVulse
> Lesmond <les...@verizon.net> wrote:
>> On 29 Nov 2009 15:22:02 GMT, ReVulse wrote:
>
> [..]
>
>> Nah, not so much. I always thought you were a bit too mean to Varizo
>> since the lad had so many obvious problems, multiple personality
>> disorder being the least of it. And it seems he's probably dead now.
>> Bad Andy.
>
>> But, hey. If you wanna beat your head against the wall and fulfill
>> ANuS's fantasies that there's a flame war going on, knock yourself out.
>
>> According to his rules, if you reply to him, he wins. If you don't
>> reply, he wins. It's your call.
>
> Like it up there in that tree-house with the boys, do you sweetie?
SPANK
Avoid normal situations.
> On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 23:54:41 +0000, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
> > ReVulse <ReV...@psychaoticremovethis.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 02:37:03 +0000, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
> >
> >> > Just as I will not apologize for being brilliant or erudite, I will
> >> > also not
> >> > apologize for being handsome.
> >
> >> Proof, please.
> >
> > Actually, it's not possible to prove that.
> If you can't prove your assertions, don't make them.
So I shouldn't declare that it's a sunny day?
> > Even if I showed you a
> > picture
> > and it turned out that I look like a Greek god, you'd still all join
> > hands and declare that I am muy feo in unison and repeatedly.
> That is a weak excuse. Handsome guys are usually only too willing to show
> off their looks.
In this case, however, the costs/benefits ratio isn't good.
> Also, you are single and have been for a very long time,
> which is another indicator that you're telling porkies.
I never said that.
Avoid normal situations.
> On 2009-12-09 23:54:41 +0000, ANuS
> <byend.removethis...@eskimo.com> said:
> >>> Just as I will not apologize for being brilliant or erudite, I will
> >>> also not apologize for being handsome.
> >>
> >> Proof, please.
> >
> > Actually, it's not possible to prove that. Even if I showed you a picture
> > and it turned out that I look like a Greek god, you'd still all join hands
> > and declare that I am muy feo in unison and repeatedly.
> Only ONE WAY to FIND OUT, son. PUT UP or SHUT UP.
In that case, I'll shut up.
Avoid normal situations.
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:00:22 +0000, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
> > ReVulse <ReV...@psychaoticremovethis.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:37:16 +0000, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
> >> > Lesmond <les...@verizon.net> wrote:
> >> >> On 29 Nov 2009 17:33:48 GMT, Avoid normal situations. wrote:
[..]
> >> >> Your life is chess and alt.flame. No friends
> >> >
> >> > ...so you're finally admitting that I didn't call for backup in any
> >> > flamewar... since, if I have no friends, that means I have no one to
> >> > call?
> >> >
> >> > As I've been saying now for years, lady... it had nothing to do
> >> > with me.
> >> > They all independently came to the conclusion that you and your pals
> >> > are lameshits.
> >
> >> That sounds familiar:
> >
> >> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.horror/msg/ac4490531a1d4399?hl=en
> >
> > "You say you're smart and yet you can't get your head around the
> > notion that
> > several people can reach the same conclusion, independently of each
> > other."
> >
> > Congratulations. You just demonstrated that I've proven you wrong yet
> > again.
> AYOC? You are making less sense than Lifshine. Pull yourself together.
So you don't want to concede the point?
> > You aren't really very smart, are you?
> You're the one whose logic seems to have taken a leave of absence.
Well, that's not *quite* an IKYABWAI...
--
alt.flame "QED" Special Forces