Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

DEFINITELY watch Dunwich Horror

0 views
Skip to first unread message

TJ

unread,
Oct 17, 2009, 8:52:28 PM10/17/09
to
It was quite good, imo. I can see why it didn't make HBO and etc,
tho. It's a very enjoyable movie, some of y'all might get a giggle
out of some of it, like how the scene in gas station might be Dunwich
Chainsaw Massacre :)

A LOT is thrown at the viewer. You'll all understand all of it, old
hat to you. But the general audience might have a hard time keeping
up with just what the hey is going on and or why. The 1969 version
was a lot easier to keep up with, considering I loved it and I never
heard of HPL at the time I saw this in a very large classical styled
old fashioned theater, where the sound effects were awesome.

I definitely recommend it, tho.

Oh, and Poor Dean.

7 PM, Syfy on SUNDAY October 18

ftr...@si.rr.com

unread,
Oct 19, 2009, 10:11:28 AM10/19/09
to
I watched Dunwich Horror last night and enjoyed it for what it
was: a low-budget tv movie loosely-based on the famous HPL story. It
was cool to see Dean Stockwell back (he was in the original film
version) and even Jeffrey Combs was in it. The acting left alot to be
desired (especially the female professor during the initial scene
where she and Professor Armitage are introduced). I guess my biggest
complaint is not with the movie itself (per se) but the fact that my
digital cable kept freezing up at the most inopertune moments (as if
there is ever a good time for a movie to freeze up on the viewer) and
I missed a couple of key scenes throughout the movie.
I recommend it too, as I am a big Lovecraft fan. Be prepared for
the "force lightning" wielded by Professor Armitage. :)
I suppose there could be a sequel (it looks like there is alot of
room to continue) but the screenwriter definitely crammed in as much
lore and names as he could in the story.
Looking forward to see what everyone else thought of the movie. A
shame they didn't really promote it better (perhaps it will go to DVD
soon or repeat viewings on Sci-Fi).

rancartwright

unread,
Oct 19, 2009, 1:28:08 PM10/19/09
to
On Oct 17, 8:52 pm, TJ <t...@post.com> wrote:
> It was quite good, imo.

Dunwich in Louisiana? Naw...maybe Bellefontaine, but not Dunwich.

LookingGlass

unread,
Oct 19, 2009, 4:47:10 PM10/19/09
to
On Oct 17, 5:52 pm, TJ <t...@post.com> wrote:
>
> It was quite good, imo. I definitely recommend it, tho.


CHEESEY!

...though I enjoyed watching Jeffrey Combs in his role...he brought
*something* to the character he played. The rest are forgettable,
except the *crazy lady* who birthed the twins...she was maniacally off-
kilter. I just can't buy any character that Dean Stockwell plays...I
don't find him *believable* in anything.

What was with all the dancing girls out in the middle of the swamp???
After the big guy levitated into the room, who was paying any
attention to what he said?!? Every time they did a close up of him,
all you saw was the gently swaying pelvis behind his head...even in
the more serious moments. Jeesh! Maybe the director wanted to distract
us from the hilarity of the scene.

I did like the camera *tick* that was used to give a sinister flow and
flavor to the viewing (editing out a few frames which causes a split-
second *jerkiness* in the scene), though they used it too much. I have
seen that *tick* used in many films many times before. It added a
*spookiness* to the scenes.

Yes, they brought a little of everything into the mix. The house was
ingenious...a modest two-story house that morphed into three stories,
with hallways that went on for miles (?). But the "house is the book"
concept was not so good...didn't care for that.

Cthulhu with a rather human face?!? (except for the row of sharp
teeth) No way.

CHEESEY, I say!


www.Shemakhan.com

TJ

unread,
Oct 19, 2009, 9:41:40 PM10/19/09
to

That wasn't Cthulhu. That was Wilbur's brother :) OH, the house?
Rose Red I think it was called. Yes, the book doesn't exist - except
in dreams (HPL's....) - so in order to access a page from it, you must
DREAM it.

I liked it - and Colms - I wonder how many scenes had to be redone due
to actors busting out laughing. That face Colms held all thru the
movie :) Lavinia was indeed quite mad - and I think the actress
pulled it off well. I liked it. I liked making Dr. Morgan into a
female too - since Morgan (the elderly guy) is one of the main
characters in my novel (Other Nations) - that was a hoot.

I liked it :) I liked especially that there were NO scenes that had
to be bleeped out due to language. I've seen some movies on sci fi
that had so much cursing that almost every sentence was not
understandable. I hate that. Do they HAVE to talk that way, knowing
it's gonna be bleeped out? Sheesh.

The swaying pelvises didn't phase me at all. Heh. Perhaps because I
have one myself and well, way bigger on top :-D.

>
> CHEESEY, I say!

>
> www.Shemakhan.com

LookingGlass

unread,
Oct 20, 2009, 3:30:43 AM10/20/09
to
On Oct 19, 6:41 pm, TJ <t...@post.com> wrote:
>
> That wasn't Cthulhu.


OK. They all look the same to me. Everyone had tentacles. :o)

www.Shemakhan.com

0 new messages