(Again Belated) 'Phobe of the Week
luke
Fred Cherry wrote:
>
> You homos are prejudiced against Jews. That's why you won't confer the
> honor of homophobe of the week on me.
>
> jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
No Fred, we are not prejudiced against Jews...that's PervWhite's and
Fred Phelp's job. We just don't like pathetic old trolls like you....
Robert
Fred Cherry
dkin...@aol.com (DKing1980) writes:
>Every few days, I read all the new articles in APH and save the
>scariest ones for the weekend 'Phobe Awards. This week was *really*
>scary. After compaction, my Personal Filing Cabinet took up about 2
>MB. I was considering *.*@southeast.net or "Mercutio", but when
>Ward's epigram of "Scratch a homophobe..." is proven true so
>graphically, it's a trump over all others. Without further ado, the
>winner for the week of April 5th through 11th is:
> "RevWhite" <there...@bestsites.net>
That's not fair. *I* deserve the title. Just because that homonazi NAMBLA
supporter Joseph Dunphy succeeded in illegally canceling my posts, is no
reason to deny me the honor. Look at all the messages in this newsgroup
villifying me. Doesn't that entitle me to any recognition?
You people are just sore because I don't fit Ward Stewart's idea of a
homophobe. Stewart says that all homophobes are anti-Semites. Well, I
can't be an anti-Semite, because I am Jewish. Furthermore, I certainly am
not a racist. I once posted in soc.culture.african.american.moderated. The
moerator or moderators of that group didn't object to my post.
> After a long Phobe of the Week absence, Whitey has shown us all his
>racism once again. (Aside: The "Negroid Research Institute" doesn't
>count, 'cuz it's been gone for a few months, anyway.) Of course,
>trashing Dr. Martin Luther King for his race wasn't good enough, so he
>had to smear him around with titles like "sexual pervert" and "commie
>agitator". My, oh my, where have we heard that before?
I'll tell you where you have heard those remarks about Dr. Martin Luther
King. They come from one of YOUR boys, namely J. Edgar Hoover, "America's
Number One Manhunter."
dsg5
> You homos are prejudiced against Jews. That's why you won't confer the
> honor of homophobe of the week on me.
> jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
Nah, not Jews. Just nutcases. Don't take it personally. Most of us can't
tell a Jew from a gentile, anyway.
--dsg
Fred Cherry
"dsg5" <ds...@flash.net> writes:
Well, you should learn how. A circumcision done by a moyel appears to
be different than a circumcision done on a non-Jew. And since you homos
are supposed to know all about cocks, you should LEARN that difference.
jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
Fred Cherry
cub...@cjnetworks.com (Mike Silverman) writes:
>In article <ErsKD...@world.std.com>, jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry) wrote:
>> You homos are prejudiced against Jews. That's why you won't confer the
>> honor of homophobe of the week on me.
>People like you make me embarassed to go to synagogue.
>(signed)
>a gay jew
Izatso? Well, what do you think about Congregation Beth Simchat Torah, a
homosexual congregation? They march every year in the anual New York City
"Gay Pride" parade. When the New Alliance Party marched in the same
parade, it didn't bother those homo Jews one bit. The New Alliance Party
proclaimed, in its official newspaper The National Alliance that: "WE
SUPPORT FARRAKHAN." One time when I viewed the homo parade, I got there
well before the start of the parade and showed those homo Jews a copy of
that article in that newspaper. They looked at me as if I were insane.
jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
John De Salvio
In article <Erw5...@world.std.com>, jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry) wrote:
> "dsg5" <ds...@flash.net> writes:
>
>
> >> You homos are prejudiced against Jews. That's why you won't confer the
> >> honor of homophobe of the week on me.
> >> jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
>
> >Nah, not Jews. Just nutcases. Don't take it personally. Most of us can't
> >tell a Jew from a gentile, anyway.
> >--dsg
> >
>
> Well, you should learn how. A circumcision done by a moyel appears to
> be different than a circumcision done on a non-Jew. And since you homos
> are supposed to know all about cocks, you should LEARN that difference.
Well GOLLL-LLLLEEEEE, Mr. Cherry!
YOU sure seem to know a lot about it!
--
John
NOTE: "From" address is deliberately wrong.
My correct e-mail address is:
desalvio["AT" SYMBOL]monitor.net
Richard Jones
On Fri, 24 Apr 1998 12:47:14 GMT, jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
wrote:
> They looked at me as if I were insane.
Funny that, eh ?
------------
0800-RICHARD - "I am not a man, I am a free number".
------------
"Go on, let's destroy comedy. It'll be hilarious",
Christine Stanger, 1998.
CrazyMax
>Well, you should learn how. A circumcision done by a moyel appears to
>be different than a circumcision done on a non-Jew. And since you homos
>are supposed to know all about cocks, you should LEARN that difference.
>
Oh, we know a cocksucker when we see one....
Max
If at first you don't succeed,
destroy all evidence that you tried.
Mike Hammond
Fred Cherry (jo...@world.std.com) wrote:
: "dsg5" <ds...@flash.net> writes:
: >Nah, not Jews. Just nutcases. Don't take it personally. Most of us can't
: >tell a Jew from a gentile, anyway.
:
: Well, you should learn how. A circumcision done by a moyel appears to
: be different than a circumcision done on a non-Jew. And since you homos
: are supposed to know all about cocks, you should LEARN that difference.
'Appears to be different'? Don't tell us you've been doing inspections?
--
Cardinal Fang +The Divine Fox+ ho...@access.digex.net
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"Weeding out malcontents...." -The Agrarian Espionage Force
sal...@ix.netcom.com
In article <Erx4...@world.std.com>,> jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
>
>
they're shrewd judges of character.
saltydogue
-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading
Fred Cherry
cub...@cjnetworks.com (Mike Silverman) writes:
>In article <ErsKD...@world.std.com>, jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry) wrote:
>> You homos are prejudiced against Jews. That's why you won't confer the
>> honor of homophobe of the week on me.
>People like you make me embarassed to go to synagogue.
>(signed)
>a gay jew
>--
>Mike Silverman -- cubsfan at turnleft.com -- Lawrence, KS
>http://www.turnleft.com/personal
Well, Jews like you mortify me. Jews like you will ally themselves with
anyone, as long as those you ally with are against "homophobia."
What do you think of Jackie Mason? Mason, the great moralist, who
pontificates against "homophobia"? Mason denies that he is the father of
his own daughter, even though the DNA test does not rule him out and even
though he admits to having sex with the mother of his daughter. He says
that he is not the father of his daughter because there are a couple of
thousand men in the Miami area who have the same DNA pattern as he has.
Nice fellow, eh?
And what kind of a Jew are you? Do you ever post or even read
soc.culture.israel or soc.culture.jewish? Well, go over to
soc.culture.israel and see how I demolished Lyndon LaRouche.
jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
JTEM
Fred Cherry (jo...@world.std.com) wrote:
[---nothing---]
Well, let's see...
At this point I'm forwarding all his crossposted bullshit, together with
my complaints to ab...@world.std.com, bil...@world.std.com,
neta...@world.std.com, postm...@world.std.com, ro...@world.std.com,
st...@world.std.com, sup...@world.std.com and webm...@world.std.com.
I figure, at the rate I'm going, I should reach a decent human being over
at S.T.D. in only about, oh, a few thousand years.
Won't stop me from trying though...
John
Fred Cherry
sal...@ix.netcom.com writes:
>In article <Erx4...@world.std.com>,
> jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry) wrote:
>They looked at me as if I were insane.
>>
>> jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
>>
>>
>they're shrewd judges of character.
>saltydogue
>-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
>http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading
Listen, faggot.
Why don't you give the whole context of this incident?
I was talking to a group of so-called Jews who were marching in one of New
York City's anual "Gay Pride." parades. I was asking them, before the
start of the parade, what they were doing marching in the same parade with
a group of homosexual neo-Nazis (The New Alliance Party, which supports
Farrakhan). I even showed them a copy of the New Alliance Party's
newspaper which specifically stated that the New Alliance Party supports
Farrakhan. I had brought a copy of that newspaper there for that
specific purpose. THAT'S when they looked at me as if I were insane.
It's a disgrace when homosexual Jews are willing to co-operate with
homosexual neo-Nazis just because the two groups share the fact that they
are both made up of homosexuals.
jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
sal...@ix.netcom.com
In article <Es9sx...@world.std.com>#1/1,
jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry) wrote:
>
> sal...@ix.netcom.com writes:
>
> >In article <Erx4...@world.std.com>,
> > jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry) wrote:
> >They looked at me as if I were insane.
> >>
> >> jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
> >>
> >>
>
> >they're shrewd judges of character.
>
> >saltydogue
>
> >-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
> >http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading
>
> Listen, faggot.
prostitutes regularly)
> Why don't you give the whole context of this incident?
because i wasn't there. and the thought of someone calling *you* nuts, given
your ranting and raving(not to mention crossposting) on the net is humourous
to me.
and i'm not really a faggot. but i suppose if we were on a black newsgroup you
would have said "hey, nigger"?
> I was talking to a group of so-called Jews who were marching in one of New
> York City's anual (snip for snip's sake)
(jew-fag snip)
> jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
>
>
(waiting for a form letter from JTEM)
salty
L. Michael Roberts
Fred Cherry wrote:
>
> sal...@ix.netcom.com writes:
>
> >In article <Erx4...@world.std.com>,
> > jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry) wrote:
> >They looked at me as if I were insane.
> >>
> >> jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
> >>
> >>
>
> >they're shrewd judges of character.
>
> >saltydogue
>
> >-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
> >http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading
>
> Listen, faggot.
Fred, FYI SaltyDogue is heterosexual - do try to keep up!
+====================== L. Michael Roberts ======================+
This represents my personal opinion and NOT Company policy
Burlington, Ont, Canada - to reply, remove 'SpamSux' from my address
+====================================================================+
John De Salvio
> sal...@ix.netcom.com writes:
>
> >In article <Erx4...@world.std.com>,
> > jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry) wrote:
> >They looked at me as if I were insane.
> >>
> >> jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
> >>
> >>
>
> >they're shrewd judges of character.
>
>
> >saltydogue
>
> >-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
> >http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading
>
> Listen, faggot.
>
> Why don't you give the whole context of this incident?
>
> I was talking to a group of so-called Jews who were marching in one of New
> York City's anual "Gay Pride." parades. I was asking them, before the
> start of the parade, what they were doing marching in the same parade with
> a group of homosexual neo-Nazis (The New Alliance Party, which supports
> Farrakhan). I even showed them a copy of the New Alliance Party's
> newspaper which specifically stated that the New Alliance Party supports
> Farrakhan. I had brought a copy of that newspaper there for that
> specific purpose. THAT'S when they looked at me as if I were insane.
>
> It's a disgrace when homosexual Jews are willing to co-operate with
> homosexual neo-Nazis just because the two groups share the fact that they
> are both made up of homosexuals.
>
And saltydogue gave the correct response.
I concur with him
Was the Neo-Nazi group sponsoring the parade?
Did the parade limit who could be in it (bearing in mind they
were probably a public demonstration on public property
using in part public funding)?
The parade also had Protestant groups in it.
Did the Jewish group therefore endorse and stand for
the Protestant groups?
There were also women in it.
Does that mean the men were also women?
Considering that there were probably upwards of 100,000 marchers
in the parade, does that mean they all endorsed a group of what?
10? 20 people?
sal...@ix.netcom.com
In article <3549F9...@SpamSux.laserfx.com>#1/1,
News...@SpamSux.laserfx.com wrote:
>
> Fred Cherry wrote:
> >
> > sal...@ix.netcom.com writes:
> >
> > >In article <Erx4...@world.std.com>,
> > > jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry) wrote:
> > >They looked at me as if I were insane.
> > >>
> > >> jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> > >they're shrewd judges of character.
> >
> > >saltydogue
> >
> > >-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
> > >http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading
> >
> > Listen, faggot.
>
i have yet to be recruited.
but i've started interior decorating classes just in case.
>***smooch***!!<
salty
> +====================== L. Michael Roberts ======================+
> This represents my personal opinion and NOT Company policy
> Burlington, Ont, Canada - to reply, remove 'SpamSux' from my address
> +====================================================================+
>
Fred Cherry
In Message-ID: <354bc6d9...@news.pacbell.net>
Newsgroups: soc.motss,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.homosexual,soc.bi,
soc.culture.israel,soc.culture.jewish,alt.telaviv,alt.support.crossposting
Subject: Re: character, cherry
Date: Fri, 01 May 1998 12:58:03 GMT
tit...@jps.net (Eric Seright-Payne) wrote:
> On Fri, 1 May 1998 08:58:44 GMT, jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
> wrote, to no less tha eight newsgroups:
To how many newsgroups has the homosexual neo-Nazi nambla supporter Dunphy
posted his message: "Take the Cherry Challenge!"? I didn't see you
complaining about Dunphy's extensive posting of HIS message. That's yet one
more example of faggot double standards.
> >It's a disgrace when homosexual Jews are willing to co-operate with
> >homosexual neo-Nazis just because the two groups share the fact that
> >they are both made up of homosexuals.
>
> And just why is that a disgrace?
>
> Did the "homosexual neo-Nazis" start beating up the homosexual Jews?
>
> Hmmm??
>
> And if they HADN'T been in the same parade, together, then - based on
> your past postings - you would now be posting that ALL gay men are,
> obviously, neo-Nazi homosexuals, since there were no homosexual Jews
> in the Parade, but there were homosexual Nazis. Why do I say that?
> You've made consistent claims that ALL gay men are members of NAMBLA,
> or support that odious organization's tenets, because NAMBLA has been
> involved in a Pride parade or two... yet consistently ignore the
> voluminous postings from gay men who deride NAMBLA and believe them to
> be sick.
>
> You, Mr. Cherry, are a prime example of one of the biggest sources of
> bigotry and hatred in America, and not just directed toward gays
> (though we do seem to be your primary target). You see ONLY what you
> want to see.
>
> Eric Seright-Payne
> Livermore, CA
Listen, faggot!
You are one titanic liar!
You are just one more faggot liar in a long string of faggot liars. I have
never made ANY claims that ALL gay men are members of NAMBLA. In fact, I
have done just the opposite. Here is the evidence.
-----------------------------snip------------------------------------
Newsgroups: soc.singles,soc.motss,soc.culture.latin-america,
soc.culture.cuba,alt.support.crossposting,alt.politics.homosexuality,
alt.politics.clinton,alt.homosexual
From: jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
Subject: Re: NAMBLA: CIA AGENT-PROVOCATEURS
Messag -ID: <Ep7oM...@world.std.com>
Organization: The World, Public Access Internet, Brookline, MA
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 21:49:33 GMT
Lines: 261
Status: RO
X-Status:
[much material omitted]
There is one other person who posted in this thread who also posted in the
thread: "Subject: Re: March on Washington, 2000 -- NAMBLA's marching too."
I am referring to Mike Silverman. He posted a superb attack against NAMBLA.
There can be no question about the way Mr. Silverman feels about NAMBLA.
Unfortunately, homosexuals like Mike Silverman are in the minority.
Finally, you say you are going to sue BOTH myself AND my ISP. This is
certainly improper. Since when does any ISP review messages before they are
posted? Suing my ISP would be like suing the telephone company because
someone made a series of telephone calls that were libelous.
You think that by suing my ISP that my ISP will immediately terminate me
with extreme prejudice because my ISP doesn't want to be bothered defending
himself against a lawsuit. Well, it's not going to work. If you sue my ISP,
I will immediately reimburse him for his expenses in defending himself
against your lawsuit.
*************************************************************************
Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. - Lincoln
jo...@prostitution.org (Fred Cherry)
--------------------------------snip---------------------------------
Mike Silverman is no friend of mine. In fact, if you notice the two of us
have been going at each other hammer and tongs recently. But at least
Silverman is honest, unlike the overwhelming majority of homos who are out-
and-out liars.
*************************************************************************
Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. - Lincoln
jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
L. Michael Roberts
sal...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>
> In article <3549F9...@SpamSux.laserfx.com>#1/1,
> News...@SpamSux.laserfx.com wrote:
> >
> > Fred Cherry wrote:
> > >
> > > sal...@ix.netcom.com writes:
> > >
> > > >In article <Erx4...@world.std.com>,
> > > > jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry) wrote:
> > > >They looked at me as if I were insane.
> > > >>
> > > >> jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > > >they're shrewd judges of character.
> > >
> > > >saltydogue
> > >
> > > >-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
> > > >http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading
> > >
> > > Listen, faggot.
> >
> > Fred, FYI SaltyDogue is heterosexual - do try to keep up!
>
> i have yet to be recruited.
> but i've started interior decorating classes just in case.
>
> >***smooch***!!<
> salty
LOL!
Fred Cherry
desa...@monitor.net (John De Salvio) writes:
>In article <Es9sx...@world.std.com>, jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry) wrote:
>> sal...@ix.netcom.com writes:
>>
>> >In article <Erx4...@world.std.com>,
>> > jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry) wrote:
>> >They looked at me as if I were insane.
>> >>
>> >> jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>> >they're shrewd judges of character.
>>
>>
>> >saltydogue
>>
>> >-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
>> >http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading
>>
>> Listen, faggot.
>>
>> Why don't you give the whole context of this incident?
>>
>> I was talking to a group of so-called Jews who were marching in one of New
>> York City's anual "Gay Pride." parades. I was asking them, before the
>> start of the parade, what they were doing marching in the same parade with
>> a group of homosexual neo-Nazis (The New Alliance Party, which supports
>> Farrakhan). I even showed them a copy of the New Alliance Party's
>> newspaper which specifically stated that the New Alliance Party supports
>> Farrakhan. I had brought a copy of that newspaper there for that
>> specific purpose. THAT'S when they looked at me as if I were insane.
>>
>> It's a disgrace when homosexual Jews are willing to co-operate with
>> homosexual neo-Nazis just because the two groups share the fact that they
>> are both made up of homosexuals.
>>
>And saltydogue gave the correct response.
>I concur with him
That figures, faggot.
>Was the Neo-Nazi group sponsoring the parade?
No, faggot.
>Did the parade limit who could be in it (bearing in mind they
>were probably a public demonstration on public property
>using in part public funding)?
Of course the parade could have limited who could be in it. Just as the
St. Patricks Day parade can keep faggots, marching under their own banner,
out, so could the "Gay Pride" parade keep neo-Nazis from marching.
>The parade also had Protestant groups in it.
True.
>Did the Jewish group therefore endorse and stand for
>the Protestant groups?
They were showing solidarity with the Protestant groups.
>There were also women in it.
True.
>Does that mean the men were also women?
No.
>Considering that there were probably upwards of 100,000 marchers
>in the parade, does that mean they all endorsed a group of what?
>10? 20 people?
They were all showing solidarity with one another. There was also the
group "Men Against Sexism." This is the group led by John Stoltenberg,
Andrea Dworkin's stooge. "Men Against Sexism" wants to outlaw such
magazines as PLAYBOY and PENTHOUSE.
If the Jewish group had had any decency, they would have boycotted the
parade and demonstrated against the neo-Nazis in the parade.
>--
>John
>NOTE: "From" address is deliberately wrong.
>My correct e-mail address is:
Almost everything you write is deliberately wrong.
jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
sal...@ix.netcom.com
In article <354AA4...@SpamSux.laserfx.com>#1/1,
News...@SpamSux.laserfx.com wrote:
>
> sal...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> >
> > In article <3549F9...@SpamSux.laserfx.com>#1/1,
> > News...@SpamSux.laserfx.com wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > sal...@ix.netcom.com writes:
> > > >
> > > > >In article <Erx4...@world.std.com>,
> > > > > jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry) wrote:
> > > > >They looked at me as if I were insane.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > > >they're shrewd judges of character.
> > > >
> > > > >saltydogue
> > > >
> > > > >-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
> > > > >http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading
> > > >
> > > > Listen, faggot.
> > >
> >
> > i have yet to be recruited.
> > but i've started interior decorating classes just in case.
> >
> > >***smooch***!!<
> > salty
>
> LOL!
stop yer laughing! you tried to recruit me to play goal on the aph hockey team
last week.
i saw through the ruse and realized you were trying to make me gay!
i refuse to sign the contract!
salty
> +====================== L. Michael Roberts ======================+
> This represents my personal opinion and NOT Company policy
> Burlington, Ont, Canada - to reply, remove 'SpamSux' from my address
> +====================================================================+
>
sal...@ix.netcom.com
In article <EsC2z...@world.std.com>#1/1,
jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry) wrote:
>
> >> >they're shrewd judges of character.
> >>
> >>
> >> >saltydogue
> >>
> >> >-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
> >> >http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading
> >>
> >> Listen, faggot.
(snip) THAT'S when they looked at me as if I were insane.
> >>
> >> It's a disgrace when homosexual Jews are willing to co-operate with
> >> homosexual neo-Nazis just because the two groups share the fact that they
> >> are both made up of homosexuals.
> >>
>
> >And saltydogue gave the correct response.
>
> >I concur with him
>
> That figures, faggot.
does a nother patient in the hospital write your messages for you?
> They were all showing solidarity with one another. There was also the
> group "Men Against Sexism." This is the group led by John Stoltenberg,
> Andrea Dworkin's stooge. "Men Against Sexism" wants to outlaw such
> magazines as PLAYBOY and PENTHOUSE.
we can't have that. i have a subscription.
> If the Jewish group had had any decency, they would have boycotted the
> parade and demonstrated against the neo-Nazis in the parade.
but they guessed you were nuts, just by looking at you( as you have
confessed). shrewd judges of inbalance.
> >John
>
> >NOTE: "From" address is deliberately wrong.
> >My correct e-mail address is:
>
> >desa...@monitor.net
>
> Almost everything you write is deliberately wrong.
everything you write is deliberately hateful.
salty
> jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
Shawn
Fred Cherry wrote in message ...
>tit...@jps.net (Eric Seright-Payne) wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 1 May 1998 08:58:44 GMT, jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
>> wrote, to no less tha eight newsgroups:
>> >It's a disgrace when homosexual Jews are willing to co-operate with
>> >homosexual neo-Nazis just because the two groups share the fact that
>> >they are both made up of homosexuals.
>>
>> And just why is that a disgrace?
>>
>> Did the "homosexual neo-Nazis" start beating up the homosexual Jews?
>>
>> Hmmm??
>>
>> And if they HADN'T been in the same parade, together, then - based on
>> your past postings - you would now be posting that ALL gay men are,
>> obviously, neo-Nazi homosexuals, since there were no homosexual Jews
>> in the Parade, but there were homosexual Nazis. Why do I say that?
>> You've made consistent claims that ALL gay men are members of NAMBLA,
>> or support that odious organization's tenets, because NAMBLA has been
>> involved in a Pride parade or two... yet consistently ignore the
>> voluminous postings from gay men who deride NAMBLA and believe them to
>> be sick.
>Listen, faggot!
>
>You are one titanic liar!
>
>You are just one more faggot liar in a long string of faggot liars. I have
>never made ANY claims that ALL gay men are members of NAMBLA. In fact, I
>have done just the opposite. Here is the evidence.
>
>-----------------------------snip------------------------------------
[...]
>There is one other person who posted in this thread who also posted in the
>thread: "Subject: Re: March on Washington, 2000 -- NAMBLA's marching too."
>I am referring to Mike Silverman. He posted a superb attack against NAMBLA.
>There can be no question about the way Mr. Silverman feels about NAMBLA.
>Unfortunately, homosexuals like Mike Silverman are in the minority.
[...]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
He goes from "all" to "most" and that is somehow supposed to make
it all OK. It never occurred to him that "few" and "minority" are more
likely true--why is that?
He can't understand how homosexual Jews and homosexual neo-nazis
might march together because he assumes many incorrect things, not
the least of which is that homosexual neo-nazis pose a greater threat
to homosexual Jews than the biggoted heterosexuals do.
I can assure you that as a whole, homosexual Jews don't have to worry
one whit about homosexual neo-nazis as long as folks like you are around.
Both these groups are trying to survive a world filled with the sort of
evil venom you spew here on the net.
balistik
Jeffrey Owens
Fred Cherry wrote:
>
> Listen, faggot!
>
> You are one titanic liar!
>
> You are just one more faggot liar in a long string of faggot liars. I have
> never made ANY claims that ALL gay men are members of NAMBLA. In fact, I
> have done just the opposite. Here is the evidence.
> There is one other person who posted in this thread who also posted in the
> thread: "Subject: Re: March on Washington, 2000 -- NAMBLA's marching too."
> I am referring to Mike Silverman. He posted a superb attack against NAMBLA.
> There can be no question about the way Mr. Silverman feels about NAMBLA.
> Unfortunately, homosexuals like Mike Silverman are in the minority.
WEll I feel so much better now! All homosexuals don't support NAMBLA but
MOST OF US DO! And exactly how did you come to that conclusion? It must
have taken you years of painstaking work to interview every GLB in the world,
at least North America to reach that conclusion. Oh but you were not so
thorough were you? You see my repulsive little maggot YOU DIDN'T ASK ME HOW
I FELT.
>
> Finally, you say you are going to sue BOTH myself AND my ISP. This is
> certainly improper. Since when does any ISP review messages before they are
> posted? Suing my ISP would be like suing the telephone company because
> someone made a series of telephone calls that were libelous.
>
> You think that by suing my ISP that my ISP will immediately terminate me
> with extreme prejudice because my ISP doesn't want to be bothered defending
> himself against a lawsuit. Well, it's not going to work. If you sue my ISP,
> I will immediately reimburse him for his expenses in defending himself
> against your lawsuit.
>
> *************************************************************************
I don't imagine it would do much good to sue you. I think that is giving you
way too much credit for the puny amount of influence you have. In order to
prove libel the plaintiff must prove that his or her reputation has been
permanently harmed and that as a result their ability to earn a living has
been irrevocably altered. I don't imagine it would cost either you or your
ISP much to defend a lawsuit of such a nature just because you make igornant
homophobic remarks to people who know what an idiot you are just by reading
your posts.
> --------------------------------snip---------------------------------
>
> Mike Silverman is no friend of mine. In fact, if you notice the two of us
> have been going at each other hammer and tongs recently. But at least
> Silverman is honest, unlike the overwhelming majority of homos who are out-
> and-out liars.
>
> *************************************************************************
There go those survey results again. I have got to read this thing.
Fred Cherry
IN Message-ID: <354bc6d9...@news.pacbell.net>
Newsgroups: soc.motss,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.homosexual,soc.bi,
soc.culture.israel,soc.culture.jewish,alt.telaviv,alt.support.crossposting
Subject: Re: character, cherry
Date: Fri, 01 May 1998 12:58:03 GMT
tit...@jps.net (Eric Seright-Payne) wrote:
> You've made consistent claims that ALL gay men are members of NAMBLA,
> or support that odious organization's tenets, because NAMBLA has been
> involved in a Pride parade or two... yet consistently ignore the
> voluminous postings from gay men who deride NAMBLA and believe them to
> be sick.
First of all, NAMBLA marched in the anual New York City "Gay Pride" parade
for at least ten consecutive years. I remember reading that fact in the
official guide to that parade, which is published each year by the
"Heritage of Pride", the organization which runs the parade. The official
guide congratulated NAMBLA for its record of being in the parade for ten
consecutive years. And that's just for the New York City parade.
NAMBLA is a far more powerful and influential organization than people like
you are willing to admit. Go to any library that has The New York Times on
microfilm. Look at page 5 for the date 1/1/83. You will find a large
article about NAMBLA headlined: "GROUP PROMOTING MAN/BOY LOVE IS FOCUS OF
POLICE INQUIRY." Now, right there you can see where The New York Times
feels about NAMBLA. NAMBLA is not promoting man/boy love, as The Times
says. NAMBLA is promoting man/boy SEX. There is a difference. I call that
article an editorial masquerading as a news story. The article, quoting a
NAMBLA spokesman, says that the state of Hawaii allows homosexual child-
molesters to have sex with twelve-year-old boys. This is a typical NAMBLA
lie. The author of the article does not contradict that statement. The
result is that people reading the article will get the idea that the State
of Hawaii permits adult men to have sex with twelve-year-old boys, and that
this is not a bad idea.
That New York Times article was slanted so much in favor of NAMBLA that for
years NAMBLA was incorporating the article into its recruiting literature
which NAMBLA was handing out to people viewing the anual New York City "Gay
Pride" parade.
I most certainly have NOT made consistent claims that ALL gay men are
members of NAMBLA, or support that odious organization's tenets. If you
have been reading my material instead of relying on what other people have
been saying about me, you would have seen that I have stated that Mike
Silverman is an all-out enemy of NAMBLA.
Six days ago I read a message by a gentleman of the homosexual persuasion
that is the best criticism of NAMBLA that I have ever seen from any
homosexual. This material is almost as good as my anti-NAMBLA material.
Here it is:
----------------------------snip------------------------------------
On Tue, 05 May 1998 22:53:49 -0600, falc...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>cub...@cjnetworks.com (Mike Silverman) wrote:
>>
>> They [NAMBLA] are universally dispised, not only for pedophilia, which
>> is bad enough, but for trying to attach themselves, parasite-like, onto
>> the gay rights movement when they are not wanted.
>
>Mike,
>
>I don't want you, but even self-rightious farts such as yourself can be
>gay. Go find another scapegoat to toss the straights. It's the short-
>sighted who fall for the right's "divide and conquer" strategy.
>
>Don't take the bait. -=- Tebster
Of course you don't want him. He's an adult.
You only want someone you can push and shove around; someone on whom
you can foist yourself, and no much how you attempt to pretty it up,
you are nothing but a bunch sickos who turn to each other for mutual
support.
Now, that mutual support is not - in and of itself - a bad thing... as
group therapy does tend to have beneficial results.
But you... people... to use the term as loosely as possible, walk out
of your little meetings with the resolute determination that, because
you are not given carte blanche to go out and continually rape
children, you are not being permitted to help children.
What a load of demented claptrap.
So, idiot, let me ask you something?
If your organization has such high ideals (I don't even wish to
dignify your organization by typing its name), why was it meeting
under an assumed name in the Children's Library Conference Room in the
old San Francisco Public Library? Huh? Why the assumed name?
And why, after your org was discovered, and the library wished to move
your meeting place to another floor - away from the Children's section
- did you instead choose to cease meeting there altogether? Hmmm?
They library was being accomodating, and didn't deny you the privelege
of meeting... they simply wanted you away from the Children's section.
But you guys cancelled... and I'm sure it was just an amazing
coincidence that, on the floor, the set up was Children's
Library/Boy's rest room/Conference room in which you all met... wasn't
it?
--------------------------------------snip--------------------------
That, of course was posted by you. You are the gentleman of the homosexual
persuasion I am referring to.
What I like about your article is that you state FACTS. You don't just say:
"As a Gay person, I don't like you." That's not enough. You have to give
REASONS for not liking NAMBLA, as you have done and done magnificently.
I would like to ask you two questions. First, where did you get this
information from? If you got it from any publication available in any San
Francisco public library, I would like to know the name of the publication
and the date. I have a friend in San Francisco and I can ask that friend to
go to that library and make me a copy of that publication.
The next question is, what do you have against crossposting? In my arrogant
opinion you should have crossposted your article to more than two
newsgroups. At the very least you could have crossposted it to the
newsgroup alt.support.crossposting. As the creator of that newsgroup, I can
assure you that your article would have been welcome there.
> You, Mr. Cherry, are a prime example of one of the biggest sources of
> bigotry and hatred in America, and not just directed toward gays
> (though we do seem to be your primary target). You see ONLY what you
> want to see.
First of all, I agree with you 1,000%. I am indeed one of the biggest
sources of bigotry and hatred in America directed toward homosexuals.
But you are absolutely wrong when you accuse my hatred and bigotry to be
directed against other targets.
You don't like the idea that someone can have hatred for homosexuals and
not have hatred for other groups. It doesn't fit the image of a homophobe
which the homosexual community has been fostering. According to your image
of a homophobe, I MUST also hate other groups, in the manner of
fundamentalist Christians.
Furthermore, my hatred for homosexuals is justified. I am an advocate of
decriminalization of prostitution carried out in private among consenting
adults. The overwhelming majority of homosexuals I have encountered both on
Usenet and otherwise have been all-out enemies of my civil liberties.