'The Daring Dufas[_8_ Wrote:
> ;3081248']
> I would guess that Roman era graves are found in the South all the time.
>
I'd guess it's worse than that. When armies fought on the battle fields
back then, they'd basically run at each other with spears and swords and
hack each other to death. I really don't know if they would have gone
to all the trouble of burying every casualty of the battle. I expect,
in most cases, they just would have dumped the bodies in shallow graves,
thrown them in the bush to rot, burned them after they'd dried out, or
even let the wolves and wild dogs eat them. I expect there's lots of
farmland throughout Europe that was the site of one battle or another
over the last 3000 years where there are hundreds or even thousands of
skeletons just a foot or two below the depth to which the ploughs cut.
Even recently, a farmer in England found a Roman treasure buried on his
farmland. It was apparantly owned by a Roman governor who was killed
before he could retrieve it or tell anyone where it was buried.
--
nestork