"Gordon Shumway" <Rho...@Planet.Melmac> wrote in message
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 02:20:54 -0500, "Robert Green"
<stuff snipped>
> >> funny, most HS grads these days can't count back change.
> >
> >Most? You must travel in different circles than I do. I can't see how
> >businesses survive if "most" of their counter employees are giving the
wrong
> >change back. Implying that Americans are that fu&ing stupid is something
> >I'd expect from Harry or HomeGuy. It's sad to see HeyBub (and you?) join
> >the ranks of the America bashers here.
> >
> I think you need to get your head out of your ass and see what's going
> on around you.
I just *love* it when someone has to resort to a trash mouth. It indicates
that there's very little truth to their position, only bluster. And it
makes liars out of your fellow Republicans who, from time to time, try to
convince us with data even more specious than yours that it's the Democrats
who use rude language. God I love it Gordon, keep it up! (-: Obama can't
win unless you keep helping. And helping. And helping.
> First, the counter employees are probably giving the
> correct change back because the cash register tells them the correct
> amount... if they enter it correctly.
Your grasp of the obvious is stunning. Why do you think change-counting
cash registers are popular? They allow owners to hire very unskilled labor
at cheap rates. (In my area those workers are mostly foreign born, although
I cannot vouch for their immigration status.)
You're looking for mental math giants working minimum wage jobs in the fast
food industry in the era of calculators built into phones, cash registers
and rulers. That makes your overall premise is pretty humorous. You don't
see a massive disconnect in that quest? Poorly educated people take those
jobs because they can't do any better for themselves. I worked fast food my
freshman year in college. As soon as I was "better educated" I became a
stringer for a national newspaper at 10 times the hourly rate of Red Barn.
If your job entails counting out customer change, there's aren't many jobs
lower on the national totem pole except for fruit and vegetable pickers.
You remember them. They are the people you incredibly expect to pay taxes
on incomes incredibly far below the taxable threshold. Based on your
serious calculation error with that issue it doesn't seem like math or logic
education was any better way back when you got yours. Anecdotally speaking.
You see as "proof" that America's rotting from within (hyperbole alert)
because people who take the 2nd worst jobs in the economy *may* not have
good math skills - that, according to your observation of perhaps .0000001
of all workers and no other facts. Sheesh. Your own education's not
looking too good right about now. Where did you learn about statistics and
extrapolation, Gordon? Fast food workers rarely have good *anything* skills
(but they DO have a strong work ethic) because they are often not native
English speakers or they are high school dropouts or kids working after
school.
> Second, even if they gave the wrong amount back how many people would
know? A small percentage I'm
> sure.
"I'm sure." You're *sure* of a lot of things where you have absolutely no
scientific or statistical proof. Are you a Birther, too? I count my change
every time unless it's so little back I might lose a dime or a quarter at
most by not checking. Check back when you can cite a study showing only a
small percentage of people ever count their change. When you ask us to
believe your contention is true just because you said it that's asking too
much. That's because you say a lot of things that turn out not to be
supported by facts. We would be foolish to accept any further assertions
from you without some external validation.
>Next time you buy something, as an example, for less than $20
> have your $20 bill laying on the counter. After the cashier has your
> total and the amount of change calculated hand the cashier the change
> necessary for you to get only whole dollars back. At that point you
> will probably get a response like "we can't do that" or "I already
> have it entered and I have to complete the sale that way.
I do that all the time and I get the correct change back in whole dollars
and most clerks know exactly why I am giving them bills AND change. I am
sure that I am not alone because my wife and friends do it to. If a cashier
refuses to do it, it may be because that's how they were trained to avoid
criminals like "till tappers" who try to beat cashiers out of money. But
you're once again *sure* it's proof of idiocy even though you have not gone
through their training or know the rules they operate under. Where are the
facts to back your certainty?
Ironically, now you're not as absolutely sure of your percentages and you're
hedging by saying "will probably." Little by little your fact-free bravado
evaporates in less and less certain statements. See how easy you are to
debunk? This is great fun for me Gordon, although I suspect it's not as
amusing to you. I can tell when you have to resort to trash-talking that
you're flabbergasted and angry at being caught so flat-footed.
> Many of today's kids don't know how to solve problems.
Now we're down to *many.* Funny how you started out with "most HS grads . .
. can't count back change." Still not one whit of proof, but a continuously
declining level of assertion of opinions disguised as facts. Priceless.
FWIW, Gordon, many of *yesterday's* kids didn't know how to solve problems.
Based on your torturous, self-referential attempts at logic, I would say
that kids of yesteryear (that's *you* in case you didn't "get it") don't
even know how to *analyze* problems, let alone solve them. You're spitting
on today's world while yearning for a mythical yesterday that never was.
Yet more anecdotal evidence. From one dumb teacher you postulate an entire
country of idiots. That's some powerful extrapolation. Are you REALLY an
engineer or do you just play one on the Internet? You seem to be awfully
weak on actual statistics to back up your assertions, preferring to rely on
anecdotal hearsay evidence we have no way of challenging or verifying. How
do we know you're not engaging in "hyperbole" like HeyBub?
What you're saying about education is as ludicrous as asserting all bolts on
a bridge are bad because you found one bad bolt. Teachers are teachers and
there's very little problem-solving required in that field. Engineers,
computer scientists, lawyers, doctors, police detectives and even car
mechanics have to be good problem solvers and they all have to undergo some
pretty serious professional training to excel at it. Sadly, yours didn't
seem to take. You'd run all the farm laborers out of the country and
collapse the agricultural economy "just because."
Good problem solving doesn't entail cutting off your nose to spite your
face. But that's so Republican too. Doesn't matter to them if the US gets
downgraded by financial rating agencies if they can somehow harass the
Democrats and falsely blame them for spending the country bankrupt. They
can easily and conveniently forget the two wars, the TSA, Homeland Security,
the Medicare Drug Plan and an incredible amount of spending that occurred
under a Republican regime and that continues to this day.
> > It's just more pointless America bashing AFAICT and
> >this time from an American, not some damn furriner. That's sad to see.
> >Especially in a newsgroup that has nothing at all to do with 5th grade
math
> >education.
>
> How many times have you seen home repair questions posted here asking
> how to troubleshoot a problem? The poster lacks basic troubleshooting
> skills because they weren't taught in school.
Geez, you really don't understand the difference between anecdotal
"evidence" (in quotes because it hardly qualifies) and actual statistical
research. As far as I can tell, people have NEVER been taught problem
solving in 5th grade. (We *were* talking about 5th graders, you know. Try
to stay on point, Gordon.) Learning how to solve complex problems comes
later when their intellectual capacity matures.
Like HeyBub's mysterious excursion to the Chicago high schools when pinned
down on specifics, you've moved from the maligned American fifth grade to
posters here in AHR to try to salvage your position. That's called "trying
to change to a new agenda when you've completely run out of gas on the
original one."
I learned problem solving skills from my engineer dad as soon as I could
hold a flashlight steady on the engine of our Studebaker. I honed those
skills later in pre-engineering at Brooklyn Tech and in various other
college courses in law, programming, logic and even journalism. You
probably learned(?) them in engineering school as well. To learn how
troubleshoot *well* takes intellectual capacity AND training AND experience.
You can't teach calculus to kids who don't understand the predicate concepts
or who don't have the brain development to comprehend it. Kids don't need
to do addition and subtraction in their heads anymore when a calculator's
built into their phones. Or their cash registers. They have developed new
skills appropriate to the new environment.
Sorry, Gordon, but nothing you've written appears to refute my contention
that HeyBub was dead wrong. His claim that fifth graders can't seem to
distinguish between 2 +2 and a color is not just hyperbole, it's pure
American-bashing bullshit of the Harry variety.
Let me turn your own comment around on you, Gordon from the illegal alien
thread: If you're so unhappy with America that you think American kids are
hopelessly stupid and the country is run by an idiot, why don't you leave?
Bitching about how little you think of immigrants, Democrats, Obama, the
American education system, etc. isn't getting anything constructive done.
What's your solution to the problems of education in America? Anyone can
bitch. It takes serious intellectual horsepower to solve near-intractable
problems.
--
Bobby G.