Re: Sea shell fossils found on Everest proove the Genesis story of the flood.

[recycl...@gmail.com]

On Sunday, May 19, 2013 1:38:43 PM UTC-7, Brother Love wrote:
> On Sat, 18 May 2013 14:48:53 -0700 (PDT), "vivapa...@aol.com"
>
> <vivapa...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >On Friday, May 17, 2013 2:44:07 PM UTC-7, Brother Love wrote:
>
> >> Wikipedia tells us that so-called "Peking Man" was Homo erectus
>
> >>
>
> >> pekinensis, is an example of Homo erectus
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> It would be funny if it wasn't so sad. The truth is that evolutionists
>
> >>
>
> >> cannot produce any evidence of there so-called "Peking Man".
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> "Professing themselves to be wise they became fools"
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> Always remember: Jesus love's you and so do I!
>
> >>
>
> >> Yes! Each and every one of you!
>
> >
>
> >Brother Love, I found it interesting that sea shell fossils were found on Mount Everest, including at the peak. Sounds like a humongous flood had occurred! But don't tell any atheist about it. They'll just poo-poo that away.
>
>
>
> Very good observation, Brother Viva, and thank you for bringing it up.
>
> Yes, sea shell fossiles are found all over the world, including the
>
> highest peak Mount Everest, and that alone prooves the flood.
>
>
>
> Praise Jesus! :)
>
>
>
>
>
> Always remember: Jesus love's you and so do I!
>
> Yes! Each and every one of you!

Wow, but that means that the flood must have lasted a lot more than a year which would mean that the Bible is wrong.

[Ralph]

On 5/19/2013 4:38 PM, Brother Love wrote:
> On Sat, 18 May 2013 14:48:53 -0700 (PDT), "vivapa...@aol.com"
> <vivapa...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> On Friday, May 17, 2013 2:44:07 PM UTC-7, Brother Love wrote:
>>> Wikipedia tells us that so-called "Peking Man" was Homo erectus
>>>
>>> pekinensis, is an example of Homo erectus
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It would be funny if it wasn't so sad. The truth is that evolutionists
>>>
>>> cannot produce any evidence of there so-called "Peking Man".
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Professing themselves to be wise they became fools"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Always remember: Jesus love's you and so do I!
>>>
>>> Yes! Each and every one of you!
>> Brother Love, I found it interesting that sea shell fossils were found on Mount Everest, including at the peak. Sounds like a humongous flood had occurred! But don't tell any atheist about it. They'll just poo-poo that away.
> Very good observation, Brother Viva, and thank you for bringing it up.
> Yes, sea shell fossiles are found all over the world, including the
> highest peak Mount Everest, and that alone prooves the flood.
>
> Praise Jesus! :)
>
>
> Always remember: Jesus love's you and so do I!
> Yes! Each and every one of you!

I'm sure that if Jesus was actually the son of god, that he would hide
his head in shame at your ignorance.

[kni...@baawa.com]

On Sun, 19 May 2013 16:38:43 -0400, Brother Love
<BrotherLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:


>Very good observation, Brother Viva, and thank you for bringing it up.
>Yes, sea shell fossiles are found all over the world, including the
>highest peak Mount Everest, and that alone prooves the flood.

6. Implications of a Flood

A global flood would have produce evidence contrary to the evidence we
see.

How do you explain the relative ages of mountains? For example, why
weren't the Sierra Nevadas eroded as much as the Appalachians during
the Flood?

Why is there no evidence of a flood in ice core series? Ice cores from
Greenland have been dated back more than 40,000 years by counting
annual layers. [Johnsen et al, 1992,; Alley et al, 1993] A worldwide
flood would be expected to leave a layer of sediments, noticeable
changes in salinity and oxygen isotope ratios, fractures from buoyancy
and thermal stresses, a hiatus in trapped air bubbles, and probably
other evidence. Why doesn't such evidence show up?

How are the polar ice caps even possible? Such a mass of water as the
Flood would have provided sufficient buoyancy to float the polar caps
off their beds and break them up. They wouldn't regrow quickly. In
fact, the Greenland ice cap would not regrow under modern (last 10 ky)
climatic conditions.

Why did the Flood not leave traces on the sea floors? A year long
flood should be recognizable in sea bottom cores by (1) an
uncharacteristic amount of terrestrial detritus, (2) different grain
size distributions in the sediment, (3) a shift in oxygen isotope
ratios (rain has a different isotopic composition from seawater), (4)
a massive extinction, and (n) other characters. Why do none of these
show up?

Why is there no evidence of a flood in tree ring dating? Tree ring
records go back more than 10,000 years, with no evidence of a
catastrophe during that time. [Becker & Kromer, 1993; Becker et al,
1991; Stuiver et
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-noahs-ark.html

Or for a laugh or cry go here.

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/really-a-flood-and-ark

Warlord Steve
BAAWA

[Wombat]

On May 19, 10:38 pm, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> On Sat, 18 May 2013 14:48:53 -0700 (PDT), "vivapadre...@aol.com"

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <vivapadre...@aol.com> wrote:
> >On Friday, May 17, 2013 2:44:07 PM UTC-7, Brother Love wrote:
> >> Wikipedia tells us that so-called "Peking Man" was Homo erectus
>
> >> pekinensis, is an example of Homo erectus
>
> >> It would be funny if it wasn't so sad. The truth is that evolutionists
>
> >> cannot produce any evidence of there so-called "Peking Man".
>
> >> "Professing themselves to be wise they became fools"
>
> >> Always remember: Jesus love's you and so do I!
>
> >> Yes! Each and every one of you!
>
> >Brother Love, I found it interesting that sea shell fossils were found on Mount Everest, including at the peak.  Sounds like a humongous flood had occurred!  But don't tell any atheist about it.  They'll just poo-poo that away.
>

> Very good observation, Brother Viva, and thank you for bringing it up.
> Yes, sea shell fossiles are found all over the world, including the
> highest peak Mount Everest, and that alone prooves the flood.
>

snip fatuous comment

So fossils of extinct creatures laid down in the Tethys Sea hundreds
of millions of years ago before being raised by tectonic forces from
around 60 million years ago to form the Himalayas prove a flood from
4,300 years ago.
ROTFLHMKWD

Wombat

[MarkA]

On Sun, 19 May 2013 16:38:43 -0400, Brother Love wrote:

> On Sat, 18 May 2013 14:48:53 -0700 (PDT), "vivapa...@aol.com"
> <vivapa...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>>On Friday, May 17, 2013 2:44:07 PM UTC-7, Brother Love wrote:
>>> Wikipedia tells us that so-called "Peking Man" was Homo erectus
>>>
>>> pekinensis, is an example of Homo erectus
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It would be funny if it wasn't so sad. The truth is that evolutionists
>>>
>>> cannot produce any evidence of there so-called "Peking Man".
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Professing themselves to be wise they became fools"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Always remember: Jesus love's you and so do I!
>>>
>>> Yes! Each and every one of you!
>>
>>Brother Love, I found it interesting that sea shell fossils were found on
>>Mount Everest, including at the peak. Sounds like a humongous flood had
>>occurred! But don't tell any atheist about it. They'll just poo-poo
>>that away.
>
> Very good observation, Brother Viva, and thank you for bringing it up.
> Yes, sea shell fossiles are found all over the world, including the
> highest peak Mount Everest, and that alone prooves the flood.

When you find fossil shellfish on a mountain top, there are two
explanations: either the sea was higher, or the mountain was lower.

--
MarkA
Keeper of Things Put There Only Just The Night Before
About eight o'clock

[Devils Advocaat]

On 20 May, 13:48, MarkA <nob...@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
> On Sun, 19 May 2013 16:38:43 -0400, Brother Love wrote:

> > On Sat, 18 May 2013 14:48:53 -0700 (PDT), "vivapadre...@aol.com"
> > <vivapadre...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >>On Friday, May 17, 2013 2:44:07 PM UTC-7, Brother Love wrote:
> >>> Wikipedia tells us that so-called "Peking Man" was Homo erectus
>
> >>> pekinensis, is an example of Homo erectus
>
> >>> It would be funny if it wasn't so sad. The truth is that evolutionists
>
> >>> cannot produce any evidence of there so-called "Peking Man".
>
> >>> "Professing themselves to be wise they became fools"
>
> >>> Always remember: Jesus love's you and so do I!
>
> >>> Yes! Each and every one of you!
>
> >>Brother Love, I found it interesting that sea shell fossils were found on
> >>Mount Everest, including at the peak.  Sounds like a humongous flood had
> >>occurred!  But don't tell any atheist about it.  They'll just poo-poo
> >>that away.
>
> > Very good observation, Brother Viva, and thank you for bringing it up.
> > Yes, sea shell fossiles are found all over the world, including the
> > highest peak Mount Everest, and that alone prooves the flood.
>
> When you find fossil shellfish on a mountain top, there are two
> explanations: either the sea was higher, or the mountain was lower.

Simpler still "... there is no spoon..."

[Wombat]

On May 20, 2:07 pm, Brother Love <clovedoc...@mesotouri.edu> wrote:

> Indeed, Brother Wombat. Thats what I'm saying, but I'm afraid the
> athiests here still won't believe it despite the evidents.

Can you not read for context? The mountains contain fossils made many
millions of years ago. Your floode never happened.
Now join the dots.
BTW, you are not my brother. Your kind of sanctimonious twaddle and
lies disgust me. Your continuous mispelling I find suit your arrant
stupidity, almost rivalling Jason's.

Wombat

[Bob F]

Brother Love wrote:

Learn a little geology, and you can....

>
> Stop talking like a fool.

>
> Always remember:
> Jesus love's you and so do I!

> Every single one of you!

[Bob F]

Brother Love wrote:
> On Sun, 19 May 2013 22:04:06 -0700 (PDT), Wombat <tri...@multiweb.nl>
> wrote:
>

> Indeed, Brother Wombat. Thats what I'm saying, but I'm afraid the
> athiests here still won't believe it despite the evidents.
>

Can you REALLY be this stupid???

[Harry K]

On May 20, 5:03 am, Brother Love <clovedoc...@mesotouri.edu> wrote:

> Stop talking like a fool.
>

> Always remember:
> Jesus love's you and so do I!

> Every single one of you!

So you don't like real evidence, ignore it and shoot the messenger.
Nothing new there from the cretinist camp.

In addition to his comments you might try to explain why the
Egyptians, Chinese and, IIANM< the Msopotamians all had written
records running prior to, through and continueing right
after your mythical flood.

Care to explain how that could be?

Harry K

Harry K

[Harry K]

On May 20, 5:07 am, Brother Love <clovedoc...@mesotouri.edu> wrote:
> On Sun, 19 May 2013 22:04:06 -0700 (PDT), Wombat <tri...@multiweb.nl>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

> Indeed, Brother Wombat. Thats what I'm saying, but I'm afraid the
> athiests here still won't believe it despite the evidents.
>

> Always remember:
> Jesus love's you and so do I!

> Every single one of you!

You have no "evidence", only lies about the real evidence. For
starters those "fossils" are encased in ROCK, they are not laying
around loose. Care to explain how they could be fossilized in sucha a
short periods and then encased in rock?

Harry K

[TimR]

If a flood left fossils on a mountaintop, the mountain could be of any type rock, whether sedimentary, igneous, or metamorphic.

If the fossils are part of a sedimentary bed lifted up over millions of years into a mountain, the mountain could ONLY be sedimentary.

So this is an easy way to tell which story is correct.

As it turns out, marine fossils are found only on sedimentary mountains, so the flood is "busted."

[alen]

On May 20, 12:52 pm, kni...@baawa.com wrote:
> On Sun, 19 May 2013 16:38:43 -0400, Brother Love
>

> 1991; Stuiver ethttp://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-noahs-ark.html

>
>    Or for a laugh or cry go here.
>
> http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/really-a-flood-and-ark
>
> Warlord Steve
> BAAWA

The global flood is a mythical misinterpretation. Noah's
flood was confined to a giant central asian basin which,
at that time, was surrounded by mountains, which enabled
this giant basin to fill up with water to the tops of the
mountains (the himalayas formed one edge of this
basin). It destroyed all life within this basin. Some
separated peoples, outside this region, however, were
not destroyed by the flood - the chinese, the japanese,
black people, and the early egyptians.

It would have been impossible for there to have been
a global flood, since there would have been nowhere
for the water to flow away to, so the flood would never
have been able to subside.

Alen

[Uncle Vic]

Brother Love <clove...@mesotouri.edu> wrote in
news:284kp85jr6cm8rng6...@4ax.com:

> Stop talking like a fool.

Only a fool would continue to deny reality in the face of modern science.
It's obvious to anyone with a thinking mind that there was no flood.
Follow that through and you'll come to the understanding that the bible is
far from a reliable source of ancient history and science. Gee, Zachy,
what else could it be wrong about?

--
Uncle Vic
aa# 2011
BAAWA

AA Quotemeister

Visit my You Tube Channel!
http://www.youtube.com/user/Vicman6311?feature=mhee

[tra...@optonline.net]

Surrounded by mountains at that time that don't exist
today? Mountains don't come or go in a few thousand
years. Good grief, lean some basic science and real
history of the earth instead of making up more crap.

[Harry K]

That is nearly as impossible as the bible story!!

It destroyed all life within this basin. Some
> separated peoples, outside this region, however, were
> not destroyed by the flood - the chinese, the japanese,
> black people, and the early egyptians.
>

That at leasst explains where all the animals came from and where all
the people and different"races" were.

If you are serious about that basin you need to decrease the size of
the mountains to small hills at most.

> It would have been impossible for there to have been
> a global flood, since there would have been nowhere
> for the water to flow away to, so the flood would never
> have been able to subside.
>
> Alen

That is only one of the minor reasons why it could not have happened.

Harry K

[Harry K]

Mountains of sedimenatry rock from top to bottom??!

Harry K

[harry]

On May 20, 5:06 pm, Uncle Vic <so...@noway.com> wrote:
> Brother Love <clovedoc...@mesotouri.edu> wrote innews:284kp85jr6cm8rng6...@4ax.com:

>
> > Stop talking like a fool.
>
> Only a fool would continue to deny reality in the face of modern science.
> It's obvious to anyone with a thinking mind that there was no flood.
> Follow that through and you'll come to the understanding that the bible is
> far from a reliable source of ancient history and science.  Gee, Zachy,
> what else could it be wrong about?

But there WAS a flood.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Sea_deluge_hypothesis

[Attila Iskander]

<kni...@baawa.com> wrote in message
news:dp3jp89ihvkejg981...@4ax.com...

> On Sun, 19 May 2013 16:38:43 -0400, Brother Love
> <BrotherLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Very good observation, Brother Viva, and thank you for bringing it up.
>>Yes, sea shell fossiles are found all over the world, including the
>>highest peak Mount Everest, and that alone prooves the flood.
>
> 6. Implications of a Flood
>
> A global flood would have produce evidence contrary to the evidence we
> see.
>

<snip>

The basic mistake most people make is to forget that the current accepted
perception of the "world" is global
Go back a few millennia, and the world basically was what was between you
and the horizon. That way of thinking is still true in some areas of the
planet.

[Uncle Vic]

harry <harry...@btinternet.com> wrote in
news:9ee47811-a724-477e...@y5g2000vbg.googlegroups.com:

> On May 20, 5:06�pm, Uncle Vic <so...@noway.com> wrote:
>> Brother Love <clovedoc...@mesotouri.edu> wrote

>> innews:284kp85jr6cm8rng6sh
> la1fh59...@4ax.com:

>>
>> > Stop talking like a fool.
>>
>> Only a fool would continue to deny reality in the face of modern
>> science. It's obvious to anyone with a thinking mind that there was
>> no flood. Follow that through and you'll come to the understanding
>> that the bible i
> s
>> far from a reliable source of ancient history and science. �Gee,
>> Zachy, what else could it be wrong about?
>
> But there WAS a flood.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Sea_deluge_hypothesis
>

Do you know what a hypothesis is?

[tra...@optonline.net]

On May 20, 3:11 pm, "Attila Iskander" <Attila.Iskan...@live.com>
wrote:

Funny thing that too. Given that God was giving out
instructions about how the world should work and such.
I guess he forgot to mention that the world is global and
extends beyond the horizon.

[Harry K]

I'm sure you are aware that the discussion is about the Noahic Flood
which was worl wide.
There were a lot more floods worldwide and they are still going on but
none world wide.

Harry K

[Harry K]

On May 20, 12:11 pm, "Attila Iskander" <Attila.Iskan...@live.com>
wrote:

That is the basic mistake cretinists make when they insist the flood
was global.

Harry K

[Harry K]

On May 20, 12:49 pm, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

> <PLONK>

>
> Always remember: Jesus love's you and so do I!

> Yes! Each and every one of you!

Run away. BTW it is mandatory that when an idiot who lost and
argument want to run away they are required to declaire victory over
their shoulder as they disappear. You forgot that step.

Harry K

[HeyBub]

Brother Love wrote:
>>
>> Brother Love, I found it interesting that sea shell fossils were
>> found on Mount Everest, including at the peak. Sounds like a
>> humongous flood had occurred! But don't tell any atheist about it.
>> They'll just poo-poo that away.
>

> Very good observation, Brother Viva, and thank you for bringing it up.
> Yes, sea shell fossiles are found all over the world, including the
> highest peak Mount Everest, and that alone prooves the flood.

The conundrum of sea shells on mountain tops disproving evolution was
debunked immediately after it was proposed.

God, who could have produced a flood to reach that high, possibly placed the
sea shells in absurd locations merely to test the faith of his purported
followers.

>
> Always remember: Jesus love's you and so do I!
> Yes! Each and every one of you!

If so, He owns the problem, not me.

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <knda2h$i5d$1...@dont-email.me>, "Bob F" <bobn...@gmail.com>
wrote:

Why, yes, yes he can.

--

JD

"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden

[Dakota]

I heard theists say that the devil scattered fossils around to test us.

[linuxgal]

Dakota wrote:
>>
> I heard theists say that the devil scattered fossils around to test us.

Still making bar bets with Jehovah, I guess.

[linuxgal]

alen wrote:
> The global flood is a mythical misinterpretation. Noah's
> flood was confined to a giant central asian basin which,
> at that time, was surrounded by mountains, which enabled
> this giant basin to fill up with water to the tops of the
> mountains (the himalayas formed one edge of this
> basin).

No, what really happened was Nebuchadnezzar II got pissed off at his
vassal in Jerusalem, killed his sons, poked his eyes out, and deported
50,000 Jews to Babylon. There on the banks of the Euphrates the Jewish
priests and scribes got as bored as travelers on a trans-oceanic flight
and idly picked up a copy of the Mesopotamian version of UTNE Reader,
which had reprinted the 11th Tablet of the Epic of Gilgamesh in the
original cuniform. And they plagiarized that son of a bitch when they
put together the Torah.

[Harry K]

On May 20, 5:00 pm, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, 20 May 2013 13:20:57 -0700 (PDT), Harry K <turn...@q.com>

Whyi do you keep lying? You said you plonked me and then immediatly
responded to a msg I posted. Of course lying is normal practice for
you cretinists.

Harry K

[Wombat]

On May 20, 9:50 pm, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, 20 May 2013 06:54:50 -0700 (PDT), Wombat <tri...@multiweb.nl>

> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On May 20, 2:07 pm, Brother Love <clovedoc...@mesotouri.edu> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 19 May 2013 22:04:06 -0700 (PDT), Wombat <tri...@multiweb.nl>
> >> wrote:
>

> >> >On May 19, 10:38 pm, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>
> >> >wrote:

> >> >> On Sat, 18 May 2013 14:48:53 -0700 (PDT), "vivapadre...@aol.com"
>
> >> >> <vivapadre...@aol.com> wrote:
> >> >> >On Friday, May 17, 2013 2:44:07 PM UTC-7, Brother Love wrote:
> >> >> >> Wikipedia tells us that so-called "Peking Man" was Homo erectus
>
> >> >> >> pekinensis, is an example of Homo erectus
>
> >> >> >> It would be funny if it wasn't so sad. The truth is that evolutionists
>
> >> >> >> cannot produce any evidence of there so-called "Peking Man".
>
> >> >> >> "Professing themselves to be wise they became fools"
>

> >> >> >> Always remember: Jesus love's you and so do I!
>
> >> >> >> Yes! Each and every one of you!
>

> >> >> >Brother Love, I found it interesting that sea shell fossils were found on Mount Everest, including at the peak.  Sounds like a humongous flood had occurred!  But don't tell any atheist about it.  They'll just poo-poo that away.
>

> >> >> Very good observation, Brother Viva, and thank you for bringing it up.
> >> >> Yes, sea shell fossiles are found all over the world, including the
> >> >> highest peak Mount Everest, and that alone prooves the flood.
>

> >> >snip fatuous comment
>
> >> >So fossils of extinct creatures laid down in the Tethys Sea hundreds
> >> >of millions of years ago before being raised by tectonic forces from
> >> >around 60 million years ago to form the Himalayas prove a flood from
> >> >4,300 years ago.
> >> >ROTFLHMKWD
>
> >> >Wombat
>
> >> Indeed, Brother Wombat. Thats what I'm saying, but I'm afraid the
> >> athiests here still won't believe it despite the evidents.
>

> >Can you not read for context? The mountains contain fossils made many
> >millions of years ago.  Your floode never happened.
> >Now join the dots.
> >BTW, you are not my brother.  Your kind of sanctimonious twaddle and
> >lies disgust me.  Your continuous mispelling I find suit your arrant
> >stupidity, almost rivalling Jason's.
>
> >Wombat
>
> Your ad hominem attack invalidates your argument, fool.

snip sanctimonious twaddle

Scarcely. Your stupidity invalidates your entire argument. Please
answer the question posed. How does a floode around 4,300 years ago,
produce 300 million year old fossils IN a mountain? Why did those
inveterate and assiduous record keepers, the ancient Egyptians, not
notice they had 5 miles of water over their heads? They certainly
reported the chaos caused by a drought a few years later.

Wombat

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article
<97f031c0-974f-4155...@oy6g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,

Zachie's socks don't understand the concept of plonking.

[harry]

On May 20, 8:28 pm, Uncle Vic <so...@noway.com> wrote:

> harry <harry130...@btinternet.com> wrote innews:9ee47811-a724-477e...@y5g2000vbg.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 20, 5:06 pm, Uncle Vic <so...@noway.com> wrote:
> >> Brother Love <clovedoc...@mesotouri.edu> wrote
> >> innews:284kp85jr6cm8rng6sh

> > la1fh59h27cn...@4ax.com:

>
> >> > Stop talking like a fool.
>
> >> Only a fool would continue to deny reality in the face of modern
> >> science. It's obvious to anyone with a thinking mind that there was
> >> no flood. Follow that through and you'll come to the understanding
> >> that the bible i
> > s
> >> far from a reliable source of ancient history and science. Gee,
> >> Zachy, what else could it be wrong about?
>
> > But there WAS a flood.
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Sea_deluge_hypothesis
>
> Do you know what a hypothesis is?
>
> --

Yes.
There are flood sagas in every society. Most are based on reality. Of
course they are not global or sent by God.
Most of these sagas are reality based even if somewhat embroidered.

There are so many floods/sagas in the Middle East that the problem is
knowing which one might be Noahs.

The truth probably is that some shepherd put his sheep in a boat in a
local flood around four thousand year ago.

Here's another saga that has proved to be true in almost every detail.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iliad

So don't write these things off out of hand.

Here's a saga about the USA.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Americas#European_colonization

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Columbian_trans-oceanic_contact#Confirmed_Norse_trans-oceanic_contact

[Stormin Mormon]

Dear Brother Love:
You and your husband are not doing a very
good job of helping people feel the Spirit. And
except Christ out of thier lives.
.
Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
.
.
"Brother Love" <BrotherLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:rakmp814nho379dik...@4ax.com...

>> >Run away. BTW it is mandatory that when an idiot who lost and
>> >argument want to run away they are required to declaire victory over
>> >their shoulder as they disappear. You forgot that step.
>>
>> >Harry K
>>
>> <PLONK>
>>
>> Always remember: Jesus love's you and so do I!
>> Yes! Each and every one of you!
>
>Whyi do you keep lying? You said you plonked me and then immediatly
>responded to a msg I posted. Of course lying is normal practice for
>you cretinists.
>
>Harry K

When will you learn to keep your mouth shut?

[Stormin Mormon]

I guess you're sickened by the people who
you love's like Jesus love's?

To music:
"I sicken Jesus, this I know.....
cause the barf bag tells me so.
We are weak, but he is strong.
Yes, Jesus makes me barf,
yes I sicken him..... "

Everybody sing! You know the words!

.
Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
.
.

"Brother Love" <BrotherLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:pdkmp8hqt5j4bftit...@4ax.com...
On Mon, 20 May 2013 22:59:03 -0700 (PDT), Wombat <tri...@multiweb.nl>
wrote:

>Scarcely. Your stupidity invalidates your entire argument. Please
>answer the question posed. How does a floode around 4,300 years ago,
>produce 300 million year old fossils IN a mountain? Why did those
>inveterate and assiduous record keepers, the ancient Egyptians, not
>notice they had 5 miles of water over their heads? They certainly
>reported the chaos caused by a drought a few years later.
>
>Wombat

People like you make me sick.

[Wombat]

On May 21, 12:51 pm, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, 20 May 2013 22:59:03 -0700 (PDT), Wombat <tri...@multiweb.nl>

> People like you make me sick.

snip sanctimonious twaddle

"Your ad hominem attack invalidates your argument, fool." YOU wrote
that.
Pot, kettle - black.

Are you going to answer the questions rather than indulge in
hypocrisy?
Two centuries ago, some very devout Christian men, some of them
Anglican vicars, went out into the British countryside looking for
something they were sure they would find - proof of Noah's Flood. To
their shock and surprise they could not find any! They also
discovered that the Earth is vastly older than anyone at the time
knew. Being men of integrity (you should try it) they realised that
God's word cannot trump His creation and therefore Genesis is not
history but morality tale plus a made up history to "prove" to the
ancient Israelites that they were not just another Canaanite tribe.
Since then nothing has changed.

Wombat

[Frank Galikanokus]

Stormin Mormon wrote:
>
> Dear Brother Love:
> You and your husband are not doing a very
> good job of helping people feel the Spirit. And
> except Christ out of thier lives.
> .
> Christopher A. Young
> Learn more about Jesus
> www.lds.org
> .

Just when you think things cannot get any more ridiculous...

The lds show their ignorance.

JAM

[alen]

On May 21, 3:05 am, "trad...@optonline.net" <trad...@optonline.net>
wrote:
> On May 20, 11:34 am, alen <al...@westserv.net.au> wrote:

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 20, 12:52 pm, kni...@baawa.com wrote:
>
> > > On Sun, 19 May 2013 16:38:43 -0400, Brother Love
>
> > > <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > >Very good observation, Brother Viva, and thank you for bringing it up.
> > > >Yes, sea shell fossiles are found all over the world, including the
> > > >highest peak Mount Everest, and that alone prooves the flood.
>

> > > 1991; Stuiver ethttp://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-noahs-ark.html

>
> > >    Or for a laugh or cry go here.
>
> > >http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/really-a-flood-and-ark
>
> > > Warlord Steve
> > > BAAWA
>

> > The global flood is a mythical misinterpretation. Noah's
> > flood was confined to a giant central asian basin which,
> > at that time, was surrounded by mountains, which enabled
> > this giant basin to fill up with water to the tops of the
> > mountains (the himalayas formed one edge of this

> > basin). It destroyed all life within this basin. Some
> > separated peoples, outside this region, however, were
> > not destroyed by the flood - the chinese, the japanese,
> > black people, and the early egyptians.
>
> Surrounded by mountains at that time that don't exist
> today?   Mountains don't come or go in a few thousand
> years.  Good grief, lean some basic science and real
> history of the earth instead of making up more crap.

The flood created flows of water so massive that
they changed the whole landscape and washed away
all but those mountains that had the greatest internal
hardness and resistance.

Alen

[Harry K]

On May 20, 11:07 pm, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> In article
> <97f031c0-974f-4155-8610-f1e21dcaa...@oy6g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,

Do they understand _anything_?

Harry K

[Harry K]

On May 21, 3:50 am, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, 20 May 2013 21:41:53 -0700 (PDT), Harry K <turn...@q.com>

> When will you learn to keep your mouth shut?
>

> Always remember: Jesus love's you and so do I!
> Yes! Each and every one of you!

Mouth - money - try it.

Harry K

[Harry K]

On May 21, 4:23 am, "Stormin Mormon" <cayoung61**NOJUN...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear Brother Love:
>     You and your husband are not doing a very
> good job of helping people feel the Spirit. And
> except Christ out of thier lives.
> .
> Christopher A. Young
> Learn more about Jesus
>    www.lds.org

He (and you) do an excellent job of teachin people to "except"
religion. Of course I did that way back in the 50s

Now if you mean "accept" that would be a different deal.

Harry K

[Uncle Vic]

Harry K <tur...@q.com> wrote in
news:97f031c0-974f-4155...@oy6g2000pbb.googlegroups.com:

Zacky wrote:

>>
>> >> <PLONK>
>>
>> >> Always remember: Jesus love's you and so do I!
>> >> Yes! Each and every one of you!
>>
>> >Run away.  BTW it is mandatory that when an idiot who lost and
>> >argument want to run away they are required to declaire victory over
>> >their shoulder as they disappear.  You forgot that step.
>>
>> >Harry K
>>
>> <PLONK>
>>
>> Always remember: Jesus love's you and so do I!
>> Yes! Each and every one of you!
>
> Whyi do you keep lying? You said you plonked me and then immediatly
> responded to a msg I posted. Of course lying is normal practice for
> you cretinists.
>
> Harry K
>

To Zacky, "plonk" is easier to spell than "fuck you". He did this to me
a few years ago. Hilarious!

--
Uncle Vic
aa# 2011
BAAWA

AA Quotemeister

Visit my You Tube Channel!
http://www.youtube.com/user/Vicman6311?feature=mhee

[Harry K]

On May 21, 3:51 am, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, 20 May 2013 22:59:03 -0700 (PDT), Wombat <tri...@multiweb.nl>

> People like you make me sick.
>

> Always remember: Jesus love's you and so do I!
> Yes! Each and every one of you!

Yes, facts that slap you in the face showing you are wrong tend to do
that.

Harry K

[tra...@optonline.net]

> Alen- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Of course sound geological science says this is total nonsense.
You can't just make up stories, with no grounding in geology,
no proof whatever that it happened. Science doesn't work that way.
Imagine you came into court with the above claim. Before you
could even make that claim, you would have to establish to the
satisfaction of the court, that you are qualified in the particular
field to testify. Otherwise what you think isnt' worth spit and
the court would not allow you to testify. After that, you'd have to
present your EVIDENCE to support your claim. We'd be happy
to look at any credible proof you have for this bizarre theory.......

[Not X]

On 05/20/2013 06:13 PM, Dakota wrote:
[snip]

> I heard theists say that the devil scattered fossils around to test us.
>

The theists also claim their G*d has ALL the power. They never say why
he gave a lot of it up. Being all-knowing he KNEW what Satan would do
with it. He must have wanted things that way.

It's not possible to believe is something that incoherent.

--
"Whether the Bible is true or false, is of no consequence in comparison
with the mental freedom of the race." [Robert G. Ingersoll, "The Gods",
1872]

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <pdkmp8hqt5j4bftit...@4ax.com>,
Brother Love <BrotherLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 20 May 2013 22:59:03 -0700 (PDT), Wombat <tri...@multiweb.nl>

> People like you make me sick.

People giving you facts makes you sick??? Really????

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <n88op81g2d6qhgnnr...@4ax.com>,
Brother Love <BrotherLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> There lies, Jeanne.

What lies?

[harry]

On May 22, 3:10 am, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> In article <n88op81g2d6qhgnnrud17epm2gm6f70...@4ax.com>,

>  Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Tue, 21 May 2013 17:37:06 -0700, Jeanne Douglas

> > <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >In article <pdkmp8hqt5j4bftit27ovre30i8n8b9...@4ax.com>,

He's mad. You can't reason with a madman.

[Harry K]

No, he isn't mad. He's just a trolling sock puppet

Harry K

[Harry K]

On May 20, 4:13 pm, Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/20/2013 4:24 PM, HeyBub wrote:

>
>
>
> > Brother Love wrote:
>
> >>> Brother Love, I found it interesting that sea shell fossils were
> >>> found on Mount Everest, including at the peak.  Sounds like a
> >>> humongous flood had occurred!  But don't tell any atheist about it.
> >>> They'll just poo-poo that away.
>
> >> Very good observation, Brother Viva, and thank you for bringing it up.
> >> Yes, sea shell fossiles are found all over the world, including the
> >> highest peak Mount Everest, and that alone prooves the flood.
>

> > The conundrum of sea shells on mountain tops disproving evolution was
> > debunked immediately after it was proposed.
>
> > God, who could have produced a flood to reach that high, possibly placed the
> > sea shells in absurd locations merely to test the faith of his purported
> > followers.

>
> >> Always remember: Jesus love's you and so do I!
> >> Yes! Each and every one of you!
>

> > If so, He owns the problem, not me.

>
> I heard theists say that the devil scattered fossils around to test us.

I was told as a child that god was the one who did that.

Harry K

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article
<22baa524-4be9-467d...@l3g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>,

But he's fun to play with.

[Devils Advocaat]

On 19 May, 21:38, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 18 May 2013 14:48:53 -0700 (PDT), "vivapadre...@aol.com"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <vivapadre...@aol.com> wrote:
> >On Friday, May 17, 2013 2:44:07 PM UTC-7, Brother Love wrote:
> >> Wikipedia tells us that so-called "Peking Man" was Homo erectus
>
> >> pekinensis, is an example of Homo erectus
>
> >> It would be funny if it wasn't so sad. The truth is that evolutionists
>
> >> cannot produce any evidence of there so-called "Peking Man".
>
> >> "Professing themselves to be wise they became fools"
>
> >> Always remember: Jesus love's you and so do I!
>
> >> Yes! Each and every one of you!
>
> >Brother Love, I found it interesting that sea shell fossils were found on Mount Everest, including at the peak.  Sounds like a humongous flood had occurred!  But don't tell any atheist about it.  They'll just poo-poo that away.
>
> Very good observation, Brother Viva, and thank you for bringing it up.
> Yes, sea shell fossiles are found all over the world, including the
> highest peak Mount Everest, and that alone prooves the flood.
>

> Praise Jesus! :)

>
> Always remember: Jesus love's you and so do I!
> Yes! Each and every one of you!

By that reasoning digging up ancient artefacts proves that human
beings used to live underground.

[Wombat]

On May 22, 3:35 am, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> On Tue, 21 May 2013 05:18:37 -0700 (PDT), Wombat <tri...@multiweb.nl>

> I already answered your questions. Now shut up and go away.

> >> >> >> Indeed, Brother Wombat. Thats what I'm saying, but I'm afraid the
> >> >> >> athiests here still won't believe it despite the evidents.

> >> >> Your ad hominem attack invalidates your argument, fool.

> >> People like you make me sick.

So those three contentless phases constitute an answer to my points?
Thank you for showing your hypocrisy yet again.
Nothing to say about the early history of geology either?

Wombat

snip sanctimonious twaddle

[Yap]

On May 20, 5:43 am, Ralph <mmman...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On 5/19/2013 4:38 PM, Brother Love wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sat, 18 May 2013 14:48:53 -0700 (PDT), "vivapadre...@aol.com"
> > <vivapadre...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >> On Friday, May 17, 2013 2:44:07 PM UTC-7, Brother Love wrote:
> >>> Wikipedia tells us that so-called "Peking Man" was Homo erectus
>
> >>> pekinensis, is an example of Homo erectus
>
> >>> It would be funny if it wasn't so sad. The truth is that evolutionists
>
> >>> cannot produce any evidence of there so-called "Peking Man".
>
> >>> "Professing themselves to be wise they became fools"
>
> >>> Always remember: Jesus love's you and so do I!
>
> >>> Yes! Each and every one of you!
> >> Brother Love, I found it interesting that sea shell fossils were found on Mount Everest, including at the peak.  Sounds like a humongous flood had occurred!  But don't tell any atheist about it.  They'll just poo-poo that away.
> > Very good observation, Brother Viva, and thank you for bringing it up.
> > Yes, sea shell fossiles are found all over the world, including the
> > highest peak Mount Everest, and that alone prooves the flood.
>

> > Praise Jesus! :)

>
> > Always remember: Jesus love's you and so do I!
> > Yes! Each and every one of you!
>

> I'm sure that if Jesus was actually the son of god, that he would hide
> his head in shame at your ignorance.

This idiot has actually indicated that if you find a homeless in the
street of New York, US is a homeless country.

[Wombat]

On May 22, 7:19 am, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> In article

> <22baa524-4be9-467d-aa9e-89d5d2aa9...@l3g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>,

It's about the only reason I returned after brief absence - especially
since I can still run the previous version of Gurgle Groups.

Wombat

[Yap]

On May 20, 8:03 pm, Brother Love <clovedoc...@mesotouri.edu> wrote:

> On Sun, 19 May 2013 19:52:41 -0700, kni...@baawa.com wrote:
> >On Sun, 19 May 2013 16:38:43 -0400, Brother Love
> ><BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>

> >>Very good observation, Brother Viva, and thank you for bringing it up.
> >>Yes, sea shell fossiles are found all over the world, including the
> >>highest peak Mount Everest, and that alone prooves the flood.
>

> Stop talking like a fool.

So, not caring for the facts mentioned by Warlord means you are an
idiot.

>
> Always remember:
> Jesus love's you and so do I!

[Wombat]

On May 22, 3:37 am, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, 21 May 2013 17:37:06 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> >In article <pdkmp8hqt5j4bftit27ovre30i8n8b9...@4ax.com>,

> There lies, Jeanne. All lies. You need to except Christ into your
> heart and sole and then you would understand.

Where do we then donate our brains? Do we get a course on how to be a
hick who cannot spell properly? Do they hold these courses in Europe
as well?

snip sanctimonious twaddle

[Yap]

Reply from cretin:" Any body can forget something.............. My god
forgot to change the fossil date to 4300 years ago. Sorry."
That is the best answer.
>
> Wombat

[Yap]

On May 21, 6:51 pm, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, 20 May 2013 22:59:03 -0700 (PDT), Wombat <tri...@multiweb.nl>

> >Wombat
>
> People like you make me sick.

The facts sickened you.

[Yap]

On May 22, 9:37 am, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, 21 May 2013 17:37:06 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> >In article <pdkmp8hqt5j4bftit27ovre30i8n8b9...@4ax.com>,

> There lies, Jeanne. All lies. You need to except Christ into your
> heart and sole and then you would understand.

Zachy, not only you spoke nonsense, but your English is poor.....it is
"accept, not except"

[casey]

On 22 May, 00:56, Yap <hhyaps...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 22, 9:37 am, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:

> [...]

>
> > You need to except Christ into your
> > heart and sole and then you would understand.
>
> Zachy, not only you spoke nonsense, but your English is poor.....it is
> "accept, not except"

Also I think it is soul not sole.

A sole is the under surface of a person's
foot or a marine flatfish.

[Wombat]

On May 22, 1:32 pm, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, 22 May 2013 00:30:41 -0700 (PDT), Wombat <tri...@multiweb.nl>

> What do you know of geology? I'm a scientest.

Since you can't even spell scientist I'll conclude you are lying about
your qualifications.
Still haven't seen any answers, just deflection and lies.

Wombat

snip sanctimonious twaddle

[Stormin Mormon]

However, he and his husband appear to be
doing a job of getting people to except (exclude,
or keep away) Christ.
.
Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
.
.
"Wombat" <tri...@multiweb.nl> wrote in message news:00b3cb8b-b8d2-4c33...@bz1g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...

On May 22, 1:32 pm, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>
>

[Ken]

On May 22, 6:20 am, Wombat <tri...@multiweb.nl> wrote:
> On May 22, 1:32 pm, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>

> wrote this hilarious comment

> > What do you know of geology? I'm a scientest.
>
> Since you can't even spell scientist I'll conclude you are lying about
> your qualifications.

> Wombat


As Nelson Muntz saz:
http://sp2.fotolog.com/photo/50/51/73/gooo_away/1256599099919_f.jpg

[alen]

On May 22, 2:16 am, "trad...@optonline.net" <trad...@optonline.net>

It isn't a theory of mine. It is a revelation given to
a seer/prophet of relatively recent times by the
Eternal Father, Who knows what happened. I shall
not, therefore, be engaging in ignorant, human
geological debates about it. But you are free to assess
its credibility according to your own way of understanding
what is true

Alen

[Attila Iskander]

"Jeanne Douglas" <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
news:hlwdjsd2-16A7A9...@news.giganews.com...

>> >answer the question posed. So How does a floode around 4,300 years ago,

>> >produce 300 million year old fossils IN a mountain? Why did those
>> >inveterate and assiduous record keepers, the ancient Egyptians, not
>> >notice they had 5 miles of water over their heads? They certainly
>> >reported the chaos caused by a drought a few years later.
>> >
>> >Wombat
>>
>> People like you make me sick.
>
> People giving you facts makes you sick??? Really????
>

Don't confuse facts with factoids that are effectively strawman arguments
So let's answer some of those strawman questions
1) Q: "So How does a floode(sic) around 4,300 years ago,

produce 300 million year old fossils IN a mountain?

A: It doesn't
2) Q: "Why did those inveterate and assiduous record keepers, the ancient

Egyptians, not notice they had 5 miles of water over their
heads?"

A: Because clearly there wasn't 5 miles of water over their heads

See how simple that was...
Notice that both those questions were based on the premise that the
great flood occurred about 4300 years ago
Considering that the OT is actually an oral history written down, it's
always funny to have literalists (on either side) try to claim that there is
a CLEARLY DEFINED date associated with it.
But that's just one of those lies that are trotted out with great
regularity.

[Alex W.]

On Wed, 22 May 2013 07:32:11 -0400, Brother Love wrote:

> On Wed, 22 May 2013 00:30:41 -0700 (PDT), Wombat <tri...@multiweb.nl>

> What do you know of geology? I'm a scientest.

To misquote Pratchett, "geology is just physics slowed down,
with a couple of trees stuck in it."

>
> Always remember: Jesus love's you and so do I!
> Yes! Each and every one of you!

"SCIENCE: a way of finding things out and then making them
work. Science explains what is happening around us the whole
time. So does RELIGION, but science is better because it
comes up with more understandable excuses when it's wrong."
-- PTrerry Pratchett

[Ken]

On May 21, 6:37 pm, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com> wrote
thjis shit:

> On Tue, 21 May 2013 17:37:06 -0700, Jeanne Douglas

> >People giving you facts makes you sick??? Really????
>

> There lies, Jeanne.

It's spelled "they're lies", DUMBASS!

You wouldn't know intelligence even if it was lit afire and shoved up
your butt

[harry]

On May 22, 6:19 am, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> In article

> <22baa524-4be9-467d-aa9e-89d5d2aa9...@l3g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>,

It's like teasing a dog on a chain.
Cruel. He clearly has mental problems. Some kinda retard.
A bit like George W Bush.

[harry]

I thought it was?

[harry]

No American can spell English properly.
Too many Zs and not enough Us.

[k...@attt.bizz]

On Tue, 21 May 2013 19:10:26 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
<hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:

>In article <n88op81g2d6qhgnnr...@4ax.com>,

> Brother Love <BrotherLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 21 May 2013 17:37:06 -0700, Jeanne Douglas

>> <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <pdkmp8hqt5j4bftit...@4ax.com>,

>What lies?

The correct response is "where lies?".

[k...@attt.bizz]

On Tue, 21 May 2013 22:04:46 -0700 (PDT), Harry K <tur...@q.com>
wrote:

>On May 21, 10:02�pm, harry <harry130...@btinternet.com> wrote:
>> On May 22, 3:10�am, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > In article <n88op81g2d6qhgnnrud17epm2gm6f70...@4ax.com>,

>> > �Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > On Tue, 21 May 2013 17:37:06 -0700, Jeanne Douglas

>> > > <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > >In article <pdkmp8hqt5j4bftit27ovre30i8n8b9...@4ax.com>,

>> He's mad. You can't reason with a madman.
>

>No, he isn't mad. He's just a trolling sock puppet

harry or BL?

[harry]

On May 22, 12:32 pm, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, 22 May 2013 00:30:41 -0700 (PDT), Wombat <tri...@multiweb.nl>

> What do you know of geology? I'm a scientest.

Don't you mean scientologist?

[harry]

On May 22, 1:26 pm, k...@attt.bizz wrote:
> On Tue, 21 May 2013 19:10:26 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> >In article <n88op81g2d6qhgnnrud17epm2gm6f70...@4ax.com>,

> > Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> On Tue, 21 May 2013 17:37:06 -0700, Jeanne Douglas

> >> <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >In article <pdkmp8hqt5j4bftit27ovre30i8n8b9...@4ax.com>,

"Which lies?" you mean.

[k...@attt.bizz]

We all know that English isn't your first language, harry.

[Harry K]

Translation "I will believe an impossible thing religion want so don't
confuse me with facts"

FACT: What you posted wouild have stripped every gram of topsoil
from the face of the earth and buried it in the bottom of the ocean.
Nothing would have grown for several millenium afterwards.

Do you cretinists ever actually _think_ about the garbage you believe?

Harry K

[Harry K]

On May 22, 4:32 am, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, 22 May 2013 00:30:41 -0700 (PDT), Wombat <tri...@multiweb.nl>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On May 22, 3:35 am, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>
> >wrote:
> >> On Tue, 21 May 2013 05:18:37 -0700 (PDT), Wombat <tri...@multiweb.nl>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On May 21, 12:51 pm, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>

> >> >wrote:
> >> >> On Mon, 20 May 2013 22:59:03 -0700 (PDT), Wombat <tri...@multiweb.nl>
> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >On May 20, 9:50 pm, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>
> >> >> >wrote:
> >> >> >> On Mon, 20 May 2013 06:54:50 -0700 (PDT), Wombat <tri...@multiweb.nl>
> >> >> >> wrote:
>

> >> >> >> >On May 20, 2:07 pm, Brother Love <clovedoc...@mesotouri.edu> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> On Sun, 19 May 2013 22:04:06 -0700 (PDT), Wombat <tri...@multiweb.nl>
> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >On May 19, 10:38 pm, Brother Love <BrotherLove4TheL...@yahoo.com>
> >> >> >> >> >wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, 18 May 2013 14:48:53 -0700 (PDT), "vivapadre...@aol.com"
>
> >> >> >> >> >> <vivapadre...@aol.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >On Friday, May 17, 2013 2:44:07 PM UTC-7, Brother Love wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Wikipedia tells us that so-called "Peking Man" was Homo erectus
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> pekinensis, is an example of Homo erectus
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> It would be funny if it wasn't so sad. The truth is that evolutionists
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> cannot produce any evidence of there so-called "Peking Man".
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Professing themselves to be wise they became fools"
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Always remember: Jesus love's you and so do I!
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Yes! Each and every one of you!
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >Brother Love, I found it interesting that sea shell fossils were found on Mount Everest, including at the peak.  Sounds like a humongous flood had occurred!  But don't tell any atheist about it.  They'll just poo-poo that away.
>

> >> >> >> >> >> Very good observation, Brother Viva, and thank you for bringing it up.
> >> >> >> >> >> Yes, sea shell fossiles are found all over the world, including the
> >> >> >> >> >> highest peak Mount Everest, and that alone prooves the flood.
>

> >> >snip sanctimonious twaddle
>
> >> >"Your ad hominem attack invalidates your argument, fool."  YOU wrote
> >> >that.
> >> >Pot, kettle - black.
>
> >> >Are you going to answer the questions rather than indulge in
> >> >hypocrisy?
>
> >> I already answered your questions. Now shut up and go away.
>

> >> >> >> >> Indeed, Brother Wombat. Thats what I'm saying, but I'm afraid the
> >> >> >> >> athiests here still won't believe it despite the evidents.
>

> >> >> >> Your ad hominem attack invalidates your argument, fool.
>

> >> >> People like you make me sick.
>

> >So those three contentless phases constitute an answer to my points?
> >Thank you for showing your hypocrisy yet again.
> >Nothing to say about the early history of geology either?
>
> >Wombat
>
> >snip sanctimonious twaddle
>
> What do you know of geology? I'm a scientest.
>

> Always remember: Jesus love's you and so do I!
> Yes! Each and every one of you!

And you can't even spell the word

ROFLMAO!!!

Harry K

[Harry K]

I doubt it. That is even harder to spell.

Harry K

[Harry K]

On May 22, 8:30 am, "Attila Iskander" <Attila.Iskan...@live.com>
wrote:
> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:hlwdjsd2-16A7A9...@news.giganews.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article <pdkmp8hqt5j4bftit27ovre30i8n8b9...@4ax.com>,

So explain the Egyptian records. In order to avoid that, you have to
do away with almost teh entire OldTestament to get a date what would
be prior to the beginning of the record.

Nice try but just the usual cretinist major fail.

Harry K

[k...@attt.bizz]

On Wed, 22 May 2013 17:15:59 -0400, Brother Love
<BrotherLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 22 May 2013 06:20:59 -0700 (PDT), Wombat <tri...@multiweb.nl>

>I answered all your questions, lier. And I have a Doctorate's degree
>in science.

Library science?