RB
In my experience, they are usually unqualifed, and are rip-off artists
drumming up business for themselves or another service for which they
receive a fee, and are almost certainly going to exaggerate minor and
miniscule defects into major reconstruction jobs....
This can be written into a sales contract, i.e.," inspections shall be done
at the buyer's expense only by a licensed registered professional
engineer......"
It isn't perfect, but it's better than an out-of-work convenience store
clerk who works on commission...
Andy in Texas
******* *********************************************
"RB" <R...@spamfree.com> wrote in message
news:401B5872...@spamfree.com...
RB
Good luck to you. A friend just purchased a 25 year home. In the one month
since their closing, they've had to replace the furnace (Cracked heat
exchanger). God knows if the a/c works or not, since it's the middle of
winter here. She also said it appears as though the water softner hasn't
been powered up in years, with a sludge filled brine tank, and judging from
her descriptions, the water heater is on it's way out.
During the installation of her new furnace, the installers had to call in an
electrician to come in later and finish the wiring, for some reason I still
don't quite understand, but is possibly related to a hack job electrical
modification, and when the same installers were hooking up her humidifier,
they disocvered that the main water shutoffs won't hold water back.
All of this in the first month, and none of it caught by the inspector.
Dave
>
>
I recently had my home inspected for sale. The maroon who did the inspection
wrote up things like " the gates around the pool do not have self
closing/latching devices. Have a licensed contractor repair."
I use the word maroon because I have two dogs and no children. There are
quarter twenty bolts and nuts in the latches so that the dogs will not get
locked way from water or the house. I guess the maroon was to blind to see
that the latches are there just fixed for my situation. There were other
things like he could not find the switch for my pool light. Another get an
licensed contractor to repair. I painted the plastic 4 inch deep cover for
the switch the same color as the house. Even the new home buyer figured it
out.
I sent an Alice's restaurant complaint to the agency that certified this
maroon.. You know the one with the 8.5x11 color glossies with circles and
arrows and a description on the back.
Good luck finding one that has a brain and a set of eyes.... I have not
found one yet.
As said before most could not make it in construction. Call some realtors,
and check the references.
Good luck your going to need it.
Second, check the qualifications of the inspector. I called my
insurance company and asked for recommendations. In all honesty, it
will probably be very hard to find someone who has the training and
experience to look at everything from roofs to basements. I think there
are some associations of home inspectors, but I suspect it doesn't take
much to become a member.
--
SPAMBLOCK NOTICE! To reply to me, delete the h from apkh.net, if it is
there.
Regarding the home inspection...the major components they should be
inspecting are Heating, Electrical, Air conditioning (difficult in winter)
and Plumbing. I agree with the person who mentioned the roof should be
assessed from on the roof, not from below on the ground. In Virginia,
termite & moisture inspection is done separately from home inspection.
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
"Are you still wasting your time with spam?...
There is a solution!"
Protected by GIANT Company's Spam Inspector
The most powerful anti-spam software available.
http://mail.spaminspector.com
"DaveG" <DAVEJ...@myob.com> wrote in message
news:3aRSb.198281$na.330313@attbi_s04...
All home inspectors work for realtors. If they kill deals they don't get
called for work. They depend on realtors to give them business.
I'd like to see a home inspection service that advertises that it does not
ever take referrals from realtors, and provides some form of guarantee for
their work.
When I bought my first house the inspector found nothing of consequence.
When I sold it, the buyer's agent insisted on using her own inspector, and
he found $34,000 worth of alleged urgent life-threatening problems that
needed repairs. Funny though, he missed the leak under the bathroom sink
that I had already mentioned to the buyer and found one under another that
had just been repaired. He seemed to have gotten his sinks mixed up.
I had a contractor come in and estimate the actual costs of the repairs the
home inspector found, and it totalled about $3500 after he discounted most
of the findings as rubbish.
I gave the buyer $1500 at closing to cover what I was willing to cover, and
that was it. So far the house hasn't burned to the ground as the inspector
said it would because of all the "dangerous wiring" problems he found that
were the same as when I bought the house, and the same as every other
identical house in the development.
Otherwise, it's a big joke, and I'd rather use someone I know who isn't a
part of the real estate network, but who knows their stuff.
Probably most of the regulars here would do a more comprehensive job than
any licensed home inspector. I've seen them come around in nice clean white
shirts and ties to do the inspections. Let's face it, they aren't even
planning on getting dirty, what are they inspecting?
It's a big scam if you ask me, another parasitical industry that feeds off
the biggest one, the real estate industry. And my apologies to any honest
home inspectors out there, if there are any.
RB
Rick
Some good advice , some bad.
Do not use inspectors that the selling realtor recommends, because of the tie-in
issues. Do look for independent firms with industry accreditation.
Whomever you get, be sure to go with them on the inspection. You will get more
information that way. More information can be relayed verbally than will get
written down.
But people that expect inspectors to be omniscent super-men with x-ray vision,
are not being realistic. A couple hour home inspection will only identify
issues that can be found by visual inspection and minor probing. They will not
find hidden problems, or predict un-obvious future failures.
Dave.
This one did not. What's the point of hiring an inspector if they can
only recommend hiring another inspector?
> Did your friend's inspector do that and did your friend have the heat
> exchanger inspected?
No- She probably assumed the inspector would inspect this. It was their
first home purchase.
Did the inspector include the water softener in
> his inspection? (Most specialty equipment like that is excluded.)
Since I was not there, probably not. But how damn hard is it to pull the
cover off the brine tank?
But then again, the inspector would probably just have recommended that she
hire a plumber to inspect this.
And
> did you friend not look at the water softener herself?
Probably not. She probably assumed that the $300+ bucks she had to pay the
inspector he would have actually inspected something.
I am also
> curious as to what the inspector said about the water heater. Water
> heaters generally last somewhere between 8 and 12 or 15 years so if it
> is close to or over 8 years old it should not be any huge surprise if
> it is "on it's way out". A home inspector cannot guarantee that all
> the appliances will last for any amount of time; he inspects and
> reports on its condition as of the day of the inspection.
Apparently these inspectors have it pretty cushy. They get $300+ bucks for
basically not doing anything and having no accountability to the homeowner.
In my friends case, they would have been better off saving the money they
paid this guy and applying it to the cost of the repairs that the
"inspector" missed.
>But people that expect inspectors to be omniscent super-men with x-ray vision,
>are not being realistic. A couple hour home inspection will only identify
>issues that can be found by visual inspection and minor probing. They will not
>find hidden problems, or predict un-obvious future failures.
First off a good home inspection should take far longer than a couple
of hours.
In my experience the hidden and not-so-obvious problems are the ones
that need to be found because they are the ones that will cost the
most to fix and are usually the most hazardous. I've walked through
houses that have been "inspected" and it seems that most of the
inspection time was spent poking a moron meter into every plug in the
house to check for polarity. Paying someone $300.00 to stick a $25.00
meter into every plug in the house seems a bit much to me.
If the home inspector isn't qualified to comment on the state of the
complete electrical system, the hvac system, the plumbing system, the
foundation, the roof, the structural system, then what good is that
inspector? If all the inspector does is walk through a house, tell the
buyer some plugs may be wired incorrectly, point out a drippy faucet
or two, and say the dwelling needs a smoke alarm, then that
"inspector" is an unqualified idiot who needs to go to work as a door
greeter at Wal-Mart.
--
John Willis
(Remove the Primes before e-mailing me)
On a side note, I saw a consumer show on TV that hired 3 competent
professional inspectors and had them go through the same house separately.
All 3 reports were significantly different, problems were picked-up by some,
but not others, some known but hidden problems were not detected. Then they
had the 3 inspectors meet to try to reach an agreement. It was fun to watch
the discussions, there were some very different opinions about what was
major/minor depending on the specific experience of each inspector. Each had
some good useful advice.
In conclusion, I think that any inspection will have some hit and misses,
and that in the end it's up to the buyer to be confident enough to take the
risk or pass on the property.
"Dave Mitton" <dmi...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:dpir10h768383tonn...@4ax.com...
> "J. Cameron Davis" <camd...@mchsi.com> wrote:
>
> >I'm in the process of purchasing a home, and I need to have it inspected.
> >What should I be sure the inspector checks so that the in inspection is
very
> >thorough? Thanks.
> >
>
> snip
" This one did not. What's the point of hiring an inspector if they
can
only recommend hiring another inspector?"
Home inspectors are generalists. We cannot be an expert on everything
in a house. We do not do destructive testing (e.g., cutting holes in
walls, disassembling furnaces, etc.). We inspect what we can see but
have to defer to an expert when something is beyond the scope of our
inspection. I confess that I am not an expert on furnaces and heat
exchangers but I inspect what I can see. Since I can usually see only
15% or less of the heat exchanger I typically recommend that the
client bring in a furnace technician to adequately inspect the heat
exchanger. I could do this if it would make you happy - I could bring
in the furnace technician (and all the other experts that may be
needed) and increase my fee accordingly.
"No- She probably assumed the inspector would inspect this. It was
their
first home purchase."
You know what they say about "assume". Did your friend not read the
contract she signed? My contract clearly spells out what is included
and what is not included in the inspection.
"Since I was not there, probably not. But how damn hard is it to pull
the
cover off the brine tank?
But then again, the inspector would probably just have recommended
that she
hire a plumber to inspect this."
Again, I suspect that the contract stated that specialty items like
this would not be inspected so she should have known. Forgive me but
did she attend the inspection and if so why did she not ask about the
water softener when the inspector did not inspect it? And if she did
not attend the inspection why not?
"Probably not. She probably assumed that the $300+ bucks she had to
pay the
inspector he would have actually inspected something."
So the inspector inspected NOTHING? Give me a break.
"Apparently these inspectors have it pretty cushy. They get $300+
bucks for
basically not doing anything and having no accountability to the
homeowner.
In my friends case, they would have been better off saving the money
they
paid this guy and applying it to the cost of the repairs that the
"inspector" missed."
So we don't do anything? Yeah, right. And $300+ bucks got her nothing?
I am curious, what percentage of the total price of the house was
that? 0.1%? 0.06%? How does the inspector's fee compare to the
commission paid to the Realtors? I bet that was closer to 6% or 7%, 60
to 100 times the amount paid to the inspector. But don't get me
started.
--
rlk
"DaveG" <DAVEJ...@myob.com> wrote in message
news:J3rTb.211093$na.344382@attbi_s04...