Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Nuclear attack on D.C.

0 views
Skip to first unread message

mra...@willamette.edu

unread,
Apr 17, 2008, 11:57:42 AM4/17/08
to
Interesting Article here:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080416/METRO/556828862/1001

Anyone disagree with any of its conclusions?

--
Mike Ralls

James Nicoll

unread,
Apr 17, 2008, 12:20:34 PM4/17/08
to
In article <da4598d2-8202-470a...@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,

So? There's nothing there that couldn't have been written in
1958.

I note that Iran doesn't actually have the Bomb and at last
report had stopped trying to get them in 2003. Also, there is some
doubt as to whether the North Koreans actually had a successful
detonation of a nuclear explosive in 2006.

This is just scare-mongering intended to justify some more
American security theatre, one of the more successful American art
forms.
--
http://www.livejournal.com/users/james_nicoll
http://www.cafepress.com/jdnicoll (For all your "The problem with
defending the English language [...]" T-shirt, cup and tote-bag needs)

William Black

unread,
Apr 17, 2008, 2:17:00 PM4/17/08
to

<mra...@willamette.edu> wrote in message
news:da4598d2-8202-470a...@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...

> Interesting Article here:
>
> http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080416/METRO/556828862/1001
>
> Anyone disagree with any of its conclusions?
>

North Korea and Iran don't have the bomb.

Despite the vapourings of certain US politicians there is no evidence that
Russia has lost any or given any away.

No credible threat.

--
William Black


I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.
Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland
I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate
All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach
Time for tea.

0 new messages