Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

I PROPOSE THAT IF THE STARCHILD SKULL IS FOR REAL, THEN IT DOES ***NOT*** IMPLY A HYBRID

2 views
Skip to first unread message

LetItBe.TheRealFormerAtheist

unread,
Aug 5, 2011, 12:12:36 PM8/5/11
to
Rather, it confirms a morality, history and science.

I am demonstrably formerly atheist, in fact a little interested in
"coming out" despite having pushed back against judging, scapegoating,
(self-) pacifying, and arrogant people who happened to be religious
(those of that nature who happen to be religious don't have a lock on those
issues,) and we're all also still living with transference (initially
fears and pains annoyingly pushed on to you until you're afraid of
whoever looks like the preceding obnoxious person.)

Today events resonate with Biblical "tip-off's," IF ONE TAKES a broad view
of their generation from Greek, Hebraic and Christian sources together, plus
understand they are parallel to Egyptian mythology, which I propose was
conveyed, plus again that the codes and stories that are resonating occurred
cross-hemispherically, and, importantly, if we consider the Western religions and the Eastern religions are the exact same religion.

Then, the stupid stuff from the West is a source of a full planet, full human species, across all human history, scientific control.

Then the prospect exists the alien supposedly to whom the skull belonged
was not a hybrid but intended for us to understand that the meaning of
a Creator revealing itself through Jewish history (the Jewish Bible constitutes
much of the Christian Bible. If you want to know what's in the Jewish Bible,
you wouldn't go far wrong asking a Christian) is to
1: take heed of that history
2: understand a confirmed time and place for proving having learned
a lesson in science, morality and history by overcoming
the most intractable challenge in history, morality and science
3: FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS POSTING:
consider that the purpose of circumcision was to guard
mitochondrial DNA from viral contamination for the very purpose
of providing the proof suggested by this posting itself.

The mitochondria are essentially captive bacteria, only passed
through the mother's egg. Jewish is defined by Jewish mother.

I propose, apart from this and other sub-theories, a greater theory.
Namely, we are on the cusp of having a morality, history and leap in
science (and technology) confirmed.
That it's all ours if we pass a test that will replace scapegoating and
arrogance with peace, and if we proceed to save our oceans and planet.

The species to which the skull is thought to have come cannot possibly
be a hostile one. They obviously could have pushed us off the planet
a long, long time ago.

It's to this day also inconceivable to most astronomers that any species
could travel between solar systems. too long for light. way way way
too far for you.

unless: the bit about information lives is for real

then: the underlying stories resonate despite the mythological parallels

then: you get living sentiments after all

then: I will have delivered. Someone gets God and your children traveling to the stars.

I provide a head start on the physical concepts here (after the Starchild
link (not that one, the next one.))

http://www.starchildproject.com/dna2011march.htm

https://sites.google.com/site/holychanges/

0 new messages