Re: On Revolutions and other fun activities was People's Republic of Amerika?

[Dan]

Anonymous wrote:
> In article <_ieEl.35964$LA7....@newsfe20.iad>
> Dan <dnad...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>> On Apr 5, 2:57 pm, hal wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 07:40:06 -0700 (PDT),
>>>>
>>>> hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>> On Apr 5, 10:10 am, hal wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 09:28:13 -0400, "Stormin Mormon"
>>>>>> <cayoung61**spambloc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Would you please define "Unamerican" for me? As I have
>>>>>>> listened to the three below, they support the Constitution
>>>>>>> of the United States, as written.
>>>>>> No they don't. They support their interpretation of The Constitution.
>>>>> Are there other, valid interpretations?
>>>> of course. That's what the Supreme Court is all about. They
>>>> interpret The Constitution for us. Not a bunch of hard right talk
>>>> show hosts.
>>> So SCOTUS thinks I don't read well enough? But I went to the public
>>> schools that they ordained.
>> Don't worry, the hallucinations won't last much longer...
>>
>> Dan
>
> Your sock is showing...

OK, maybe the hallucinations WILL last quite a bit longer...

Damn, I hate when I'm wrong.

Dan