One World Government The Real Aim of Environmentalism
Escape_the_Cult_Now
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/16694
"The Reality Behind Green
Al Gore and his sycophants (includes nearly all Democrats, Pelosi, state
governors, big business, and Obama) huddle together to make mighty money at
our expense. Behind the whole charade, as always, is money and power."
..."Save the World? Marketing Drivel!
Everything we see happening is the result of overwhelming Marxist-Fascist
machinations to bring about world rule. �Saving the World� is just a cute
marketing ploy used to hide the reality of political violence against the
people. The tools of Marxism-Fascism include loss of freedoms � which is why
most western countries are now snowed-under by PC laws and demands; loss of
choice of energy supplies and types; genocide, especially of Third World
peoples � hence the refusal of greens to allow Africa to use coal and gas;
increasingly crippling taxation"
...
"Pseudo-Science, the Fall Guy
The front for all this is pseudo-science, the supposed science of
environmentalism. That is, tree-huggers are trying to make their insanity
into a living, breathing system!"
�The Global Green Agenda�, Barry Napier. Published, Petra Press, 2009.
Foreword by Dr Tim Ball.
ISBN 978-0-9559908-1-6 Available Amazon and book stores.
Follow link to longer article.
jos boersema
More accurately: the enemy has found a way to abuse the need to have
less environmental damage, thus is putting itself at the head. Many
environmentalists are probably far too pre-occupied with their goals
to notice that what seems it could be useful contributions to the
cause of a healthier environment, are in fact socially impossible
machinations of a one world state. Many environmentalists probably
simply don't have their minds tuned in to the social issues humanity
has with top level crime and threats to national democracy. They may
also be far too trustworthy and scientific, and maybe too socially
optimistic, to believe that agreements by top level governments to
combine in vast empires are not desirable, not even for the environment.
The criminal enemy is wishing for some kind of destruction of democracy.
Since that is difficult to achieve in one nation, it can still be
achieved by making the nation absurdly large, thereby also removing
all (sovereign) diversity from the Earth legally and socially. The
environment - why always the bother with "global warming ?! don't
ever increasing land fills and poisens count anymore ? - is in many
ways a global affair. It makes perfect sense for the enemy to try to
adopt this.
They probably said to themselves: we want a global tirany, and if that
has to have a pretence democratic protocol that's fine. As long as
it is merely a pretence, like the USA elections for president.
Then someone probably said: "to make that happen, it would be useful
if we can take genuinely global issues and try to foment a sovereign
state attached to those issues; or if we could change national issues
to become global issues and do the same; or if we could pretend that
national issues have become global issues."
After the council of evil had heard that strategic plan (say), they
might have proceeded to come up with various issues that fit that
'global' component. In their think-tanks as they call it. Someone
shouts "the environment," another shouts "a disease!" another shouts:
"commerce!" another shouts "scientific discovery!". The pens are
writing this down frantically, what a harvast ! Another cry: "finance!".
Another: "war."
After writing them all down, they proceed to generate a globalist view
in the various nations, attempt to foment a global sphere of culture,
trade, war, disease, finance, environment, etc etc.
Notice how nobody talks about land-fills ? They are a national issue.
Doesn't fit the agenda. Global warming ? All the time they talk about
that. It is a global thing, the wind, etc. Trade barriers had to be
destroyed, a global single market to be created. That then automatically
could lead to the problems that entail (standards for example), and
then they could come in with some sort of global regulatory body. Oh
hey, how handy there's the UN, let's attach it to that.
The enemy is quite a strategic thinker so it seems, they are apparently
having people smart enough to think that way, and they are apparently
doing it. Enough has come out to make that credible at least, imho.
Truth in all these issues ...
- It is absolutely imperative to limit sovereingty to kingdom size, or
there is no chance a people will be able to keep it democratic (or
republican if you want). Diversity same.
- Markets are far more stable, the whole world is far more stable if
each nation takes care of its own complete market, where they
manufacture just about everything they need. Every nation has the
entire range of industry, or at the very least the basics of what
people are used to. So that would mean a phone producing factory
in each nation, food production in each nation, clothing production
in each nation, etc etc etc. Notice how this can help the diversity
in the world. Now say that entire regions of the Earth experience
trouble, the rest is insulated. You achieve this through for example
trade barriers / tarrifs.
- International disease outbreaks are helped a lot if nations are more
into themselves. First of all all physical movement accross borders
can be stopped, stopping human-to-human transmitted diseases. Once
a disease breaks into a nation, that nation can react in a way that
suits it, and have learned from a variety of approaches having already
attempted in other nations (who are also sovereign, and will therefore
have the freedom to do what they want.)
- Nations will have to deal with their own garbage, can't simply
transport it to a far off area. Some nations proceed to develop
better technologies (recycling), others take it over, etc.
There is not that many really global issues with the environment at all.
Air pollution is one of them. In the national model, you can still do
a good job and thereby give yourselve a good name and good standing in
the world. You can also still talk to other nations of course, just not
unite either under a piece of paper or ruling agency. Once greener
technologies are developed that should probably take care of the
problem. Leading by example in this area would be a solution.
*
I don't really understand why some people say "global warming is a
hoax." You honestly don't know that, the data is not sufficient to
really know it all. It may very well be that now that the enemy is
looking to abuse the green movement they are going to do a lot of
lying, but that doesn't detract from the fact that there are an
awful lot of humans doing an unbelievable amount of pollution. The
story that nature also produces global climate changes proves nothing.
People who think that such a fact proves anything ... that's just
trash logic. Even if nature provides for violent temperature swings,
that doesn't mean human pollution can also cause that. Even if the
sun is suposedly warming the planet, that doesn't mean that human
pollution couldn't be causing an additional destabilizing influence.
It shouldn't be so much about global-warming as it should be about
pollution. If pollution caused no global warming or any effect on
temperature, there still would be a gigantic catastrophe in the
making from the pollution. What about all that plastic that is
floating in the oceans, for example, what about all the unhealthy
chemicals being pumped in the air, what about the ozone hole. A long
time ago people thought the Earth was infinite, and it isn't.
The enemy is always trying to put itself at th ehead of any moment,
that's where the power is. Then they try to curb it to their designs.
Notice how the IMF (or something like that), there was some talk about
its 'special drawing right' currency ? A fiat currency always needs
to be taxed back, that is at least the principle from which it gains
its value (people need to have it to pay taxes, causing demand for
that currency). Then they are talking about global carbon pollution
taxes ? Are they combining those things then, then they have a global
currency and that means a one world state, which can not practically
be a democracy (too large).